DOCSLIB.ORG

A New Perspective on Vowel Variation Across the 19Th and 20Th Centuries in Columbus, OH Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A New Perspective on Vowel Variation Across the 19Th and 20Th Centuries in Columbus, OH Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfil A New Perspective on Vowel Variation across the 19th and 20th Centuries in Columbus, OH Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By David Durian, M.A., B.A. Graduate Program in Linguistics The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Donald Winford, Advisor Cynthia G. Clopper Brian D. Joseph Copyright by David Durian 2012 Abstract The research in this dissertation focuses on the documentation and analysis of vowel variation and sound change in Columbus, OH. Columbus is a Midland speech community located in the Midwestern United States. Specifically, this work documents and analyzes vowel variation among 62 native-English speaking European American informants, who are divided into 4 generation cohort groups (speakers born 1896-1913; 1924-1938, 1945-1968, and 1976-1991), 2 social class groups (middle and working), and 2 sex groups (male and female), so that patterns of vowel variation and sound change can be measured quantitatively across a number of speakers' vowel systems which are representative of the Columbus vowel system throughout the course of the 20th Century. Some vowel system data, obtained from 19th Century Central Ohioans, is also analyzed for use in establishing an "initial state" for the Columbus vowel system, from which patterns of vowel variation and sound change observed in the data diverge over time. Although vowel variation and sound change across the entire vowel system is documented and analyzed, several specific patterns of vowel variation are given extensive focus for analysis, description, and discussion. These patterns include the parallel fronting of the back diphthongs /uw/ and /ow/; the conditioned tensing and raising of /ae/, also known as split short-a system raising; and the Third Dialect Shift, a pattern of covariant vowel movement in which the low vowels /a/ and /ae/ are involved in ii a backing chain shift, and the front vowels /E/ and /I/ are involved in a backing parallel shift. Each of these patterns of vowel variation are quantitatively analyzed using linear mixed effects regression (lmer) analyses. The data analyzed are vowel formant data normalized using Lobanov's (1971) z-score technique. The influence of the social factors sex, social class, and age on the social conditioning of vowel variation is analyzed using the lmers, as are the linguistic factors of following and preceding consonant. Additional factors, such as speakers' social evaluations of vowel variations, speakers' language attitudes towards social and regional dialects spoken in Ohio and in the US more generally, and speakers' attitudes towards Columbus as a community, are also investigated. In addition, the possible influence of demographic changes, economic changes, and urban growth patterns in Columbus during the 20th Century on the patterns of vowel variation exhibited by speakers is explored. Our study is notable in being the first to document the occurrence of the split short-a system in Columbus vowel systems. It is also notable as being the first statistical analysis of vowel variation trends in a US Midland community across 4 generations of middle and working class European American speakers. In addition, it is the first to feature a systematic overall pattern analysis of the full vowel systems of 19th Century- born Central Ohioans impressionistically transcribed for the Linguistic Atlas of the North Central States [LANCS] in 1933 (and collected as McDavid & Payne, 1976-1978). iii Dedication This work is dedicated to two scholars who were significant influences on me while I conducted my research for, and completed my writing of, this dissertation: Dr. Henry Hunker (1924-2009), Professor of Geography at The Ohio State University; and Dr. Robert Stockwell (1925-2012), Professor of Linguistics at the University of California, Los Angeles. iv Acknowledgements There are many people I wish to acknowledge as I complete the writing of this dissertation. As many readers may know, during the course of the time that I did the fieldwork and writing of this dissertation, I went through quite a life journey. As a result, the period of writing and analysis was longer than it often is, which has contributed to the list of acknowledgements becoming even longer than it would have been otherwise. First and foremost, I would like to thank my informants. Without them, this dissertation would not have been possible, because I would have nothing to study. Thanks to all of you who opened you homes to me, or took the time to meet with me at Oxley Hall, to talk about talk in Columbus. Next, I would like to thank my committee. I would like to thank my advisor, Don Winford, for all of his help and guidance during the 9 and 1/2 years I was a graduate student at Ohio State. The advice you gave me throughout my time here as a researcher and as an academic has proved invaluable to me. I would also like to thank Brian Joseph for being both a committee member and a friend throughout my time in graduate student, as well. The advice and input you gave on the historical and phonological aspects of my work are very much appreciated. In addition, I would like to thank Cynthia Clopper for serving on my committee, as well. The advice you provided on vowel analysis, normalization, and linear multiple effects regression proved to be invaluable. Finally, I v would also like to thank my undergraduate mentors Don Hardy and Lisa Ann Cairns, whose guidance and friendship led me to going to grad school, and thus, ultimately influenced the work presented here by getting me starting down this path in the first place. Beyond my committee, I would also like to thank a variety of linguists who provided me with additional advice and insights, not just during the dissertation writing process, but also more generally throughout my graduate school career. First and foremost, I wish to thank Erik Thomas for the help and advice he gave me regarding vowel analysis during the earlier years of my graduate career. I likely would not have been as excited to study the Columbus vowel system had it not been for Erik and his earlier work on Columbus vowels. In addition, I would like to thank William Labov, Dennis Preston, Charles Boberg, and Matt Gordon for comments after conference presentations on material that I ultimately wrote about here in Chapters 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. I would also like to thank Walt Wolfram, Peter Trudgill, Betty Birner, Scott Schwenter, John Lawler, Bartek Plichta, Malcah Yaeger-Dror, Ben Munson, Rob Hagiwara, Joe Salmons, Craige Roberts, Chris Brew, Julie McGory, Rich Janda, Aaron Dinkin, Daniel Erza Johnson, Josef Fruehwald, Michael Friesner, Kara Becker, Hilary Prichard, Tyler Kendall, David Bowie, Benjamin Tobert, Christine Mallinson, Doug Bigham, Kate Shaw Points, Jessica White Susaita, Jennifer Nycz, Meredith Tamminga, Laurel MacKenzie, Sonya Fix, Cara Shousterman, Brian Jose, Molly Babel, Anita Szakay, and Maeve vi Eberhardt, for their interest, support, and good conversations over the years that I worked on this. Another group of colleagues I wish to thank is my student interns--the folks who helped me complete large chunks of the analytical work. Without their help, vowel coding and formant analysis of the instrumental data would never have gotten done in any kind of timely fashion. Specifically, I thank Erica Crawford, Jenn Schumacher, Missy Reynard, Josh Roush, Val Lindak, Andrew Smith, and Emily Dorrian. Beyond these folks, I would also like to thank a number of my Ohio State colleagues for friendship, intellectual camaraderie, and general excellent times, throughout my time in graduate school. In particular, I wish to thank Grant McGuire, Na’im Tyson, Angelo Costanzo, Mike Armstrong, Stacey Bailey, Adriane Boyd, Bridget Smith, Kathleen Hall, Julia Papke, Salena Sampson, Christin Wilson, Mike Phelan, Katie Carmichael, Abby Walker, Rachel Burdin, Vedrana Mihalicek, Chris Worth, Marivic Lesho, Andy Plummer, Brice Russ, Meghan Armstrong, Robin Dodsworth, Ila Nagar, and Anouschka Bergman. In addition, I would like to thank my parents, as well as my two brothers, for their support while I dissertated. Finally, one last set of folks I would like to thank is the organizations and individuals who contributed data to me for use in this dissertation. First, I wish to thank the Ohio Historical Society for allowing me to use recordings of 7 informants, born 1898- 1913, who were tape recorded for various projects conducted by the OHS in the 1970s vii and 1980s. Second, I would like to thank Joan Hall, on behalf of The Dictionary of American Regional English [DARE] for allowing me to use the tape-recorded interview for DAREOH098, made in 1970. Third, I wish to thank Erik Thomas, of North Carolina State University, for allowing me to use his tape recorded interview with ColumbusMK, the Columbusite who also appears plotted in Thomas (2001), for analysis in my work, as well. This recording was made in 1984. Fourth, I wish to thank Bill Kretzchmar, on behalf of the Linguistic Atlas of the North Central States [LANCS], for letting me use Raven McDavid's recorded interview with LANCSOH28C, made in 1957. At the time we first analyzed this audio for formant data to use in this dissertation (2008), only a roughly 34-minute fragment of usable audio from the interview could be found. So this is all we used. As of 2011, however, a much larger portion is now available. We hope to use this larger portion in an updated version of our analysis at a later date. Fifth, and finally, I wish to thank the Department of Psychology at the Ohio State University for allowing me to use several informants, all born circa 1938-1980, who were recorded for the Buckeye Speech Corpus project, in 2000-2001.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phonetic and Phonological Systems Analysis (PPSA) User Notes For
    Phonetic and Phonological Systems Analysis (PPSA) User Notes for English Systems Sally Bates* and Jocelynne Watson** *University of St Mark and St John **Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh “A fully comprehensive analysis is not required for every child. A systematic, principled analysis is, however, necessary in all cases since it forms an integral part of the clinical decision-making process.” Bates & Watson (2012, p 105) Sally Bates & Jocelynne Watson (Authors) QMU & UCP Marjon © Phonetic and Phonological Systems Analysis (PPSA) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Table of Contents Phonetic and Phonological Systems Analysis (PPSA) Introduction 3 PPSA Child 1 Completed PPSA 5 Using the PPSA (Page 1) Singleton Consonants and Word Structure 8 PI (Phonetic Inventory) 8 Target 8 Correct Realisation 10 Errored Realisation and Deletion 12 Other Errors 15 Using the PPSA (Page 2) Consonant Clusters 16 WI Clusters 17 WM Clusters 18 WF Clusters 19 Using the PPSA (Page 3) Vowels 20 Using the PPSA (Page 2) Error Pattern Summary 24 Child 1 Interpretation 25 Child 5 Data Sample 27 Child 5 Completed PPSA 29 Child 5 Interpretation 32 Advantages of the PPSA – why we like this approach 34 What the PPSA doesn’t do 35 References 37 Key points of the Creative Commons License operating with this PPSA Resource 37 N.B. We recommend that the reader has a blank copy of the 3 page PPSA to follow as they go through this guide. This is also available as a free download (PPSA Charting and Summary Form) under the same creative commons license conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological Processes
    Phonological Processes Phonological processes are patterns of articulation that are developmentally appropriate in children learning to speak up until the ages listed below. PHONOLOGICAL PROCESS DESCRIPTION AGE ACQUIRED Initial Consonant Deletion Omitting first consonant (hat → at) Consonant Cluster Deletion Omitting both consonants of a consonant cluster (stop → op) 2 yrs. Reduplication Repeating syllables (water → wawa) Final Consonant Deletion Omitting a singleton consonant at the end of a word (nose → no) Unstressed Syllable Deletion Omitting a weak syllable (banana → nana) 3 yrs. Affrication Substituting an affricate for a nonaffricate (sheep → cheep) Stopping /f/ Substituting a stop for /f/ (fish → tish) Assimilation Changing a phoneme so it takes on a characteristic of another sound (bed → beb, yellow → lellow) 3 - 4 yrs. Velar Fronting Substituting a front sound for a back sound (cat → tat, gum → dum) Backing Substituting a back sound for a front sound (tap → cap) 4 - 5 yrs. Deaffrication Substituting an affricate with a continuant or stop (chip → sip) 4 yrs. Consonant Cluster Reduction (without /s/) Omitting one or more consonants in a sequence of consonants (grape → gape) Depalatalization of Final Singles Substituting a nonpalatal for a palatal sound at the end of a word (dish → dit) 4 - 6 yrs. Stopping of /s/ Substituting a stop sound for /s/ (sap → tap) 3 ½ - 5 yrs. Depalatalization of Initial Singles Substituting a nonpalatal for a palatal sound at the beginning of a word (shy → ty) Consonant Cluster Reduction (with /s/) Omitting one or more consonants in a sequence of consonants (step → tep) Alveolarization Substituting an alveolar for a nonalveolar sound (chew → too) 5 yrs.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Oral Articulation of Vowel Nasality in the Light of the Independent Effects of Nasalization on Vowel Quality
    DOI: 10.17469/O2104AISV000002 CHRISTOPHER CARIGNAN An examination of oral articulation of vowel nasality in the light of the independent effects of nasalization on vowel quality In this paper, a summary is given of an experimental technique to address a known issue in research on the independent effects of nasalization on vowel acoustics: given that the separate transfer functions associated with the oral and nasal cavities are merged in the acoustic signal, the task of teasing apart the respective effects of the two cavities seems to be an intractable problem. The results obtained from the method reveal that the independent effects of nasal- ization on the acoustic vowel space are: F1-raising for high vowels, F1-lowering for non-high vowels, and F2-lowering for non-front vowels. The results from previous articulatory research performed by the author on the production of vowel nasality in French, Hindi, and English are discussed in the light of these independent effects of nasalization on vowel quality. Keywords: vowel nasality, vowel quality, articulation, acoustics, sound change. 1. Introduction A traditional characterization of vowel nasality adopts a seemingly binary classification of vowel sounds based on the relative height of the velum: nasal vowels are produced with a low velum position (and, thus, air radiation from both the oral and nasal cavities), where- as oral vowels are produced with a high velum position (and, thus, air radiation from the oral cavity alone). While it is unquestionably true that nasal vowels are produced with a lowered velum, this traditional characterization carries an implicit assumption about the state of the oral cavity for the production of a nasal vowel, i.e., that the nasal vowel maintains the same articulatory characteristics as its non-nasal counterpart in all aspects except for the height of the velum.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonetic Enhancement and Three Patterns of English A-Tensing
    University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 23 Issue 1 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Penn Article 21 Linguistics Conference 2017 Phonetic Enhancement and Three Patterns of English a-Tensing Yining Nie New York University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl Recommended Citation Nie, Yining (2017) "Phonetic Enhancement and Three Patterns of English a-Tensing," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 23 : Iss. 1 , Article 21. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol23/iss1/21 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol23/iss1/21 For more information, please contact repository@pobox.upenn.edu. Phonetic Enhancement and Three Patterns of English a-Tensing Abstract English a-tensing has received numerous treatments in the phonological and sociolinguistic literature, but the question of why it occurs (i) at all and (ii) in seemingly unnatural disjunctive phonological environments has not been settled. This paper presents a novel phonetic enhancement account of a-tensing in Philadelphia, New York City and Belfast English. I propose that a-tensing is best understood as an allophonic process which facilitates the perceptual identity and articulatory ease of nasality, voicing and/or segment duration in the following consonant. This approach unifies the apparently unnatural phonological environments in which the two a variants surface and predicts the attested dialectal patterns. A synchronic account of a-tensing also provides
    [Show full text]
  • The Reversal of a Sound Change in Cincinnati Stephanie M
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarlyCommons@Penn University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 3 Issue 1 (N)WAVES and MEANS: A selection of Article 19 papers from NWAVE 24 1-1-1996 The Reversal of a Sound Change in Cincinnati Stephanie M. Strassel Charles Boberg This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol3/iss1/19 For more information, please contact libraryrepository@pobox.upenn.edu. The Reversal of a Sound Change in Cincinnati This working paper is available in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol3/ iss1/19 The Reversal of a Sound Change in Cincinnati Stephanie M. Strassel and Charles Boberg University of Pennsylvania 1 Introduction One of the most important variables for characterizing and distinguishing American English dialects is the phoneme /'iJ:./, or "short-a", the sound of mat, mass and man. Many dialects have two main allophones of l'i1:-/: a tense ['iJ:.h], characterized by phonetic raising along the outer perimeter of the vowel space and the development of a central in-glide; and a lax, monophthongal ['iJ:.] more or less in the position of cardinal ['iJ:.]. In some dialects these allophones have split into two phonem~. Labov (1991:12), in putting forth a tertiary typology of English dialects, calls this split one of two "pivot points" in American English. Some of the oldest American dialects, those on the Atlantic Coast and in the South, have tense /'iJ:./ in a restricted set of environments, most commonly before front nasals, voiceless fricatives and varying subsets of the voiced consonants.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Anatomy of a Chain Shift1 DANIEL A
    J. Linguistics, Page 1 of 25. f Cambridge University Press 2010 doi:10.1017/S0022226710000368 On the anatomy of a chain shift1 DANIEL A. DINNSEN, CHRISTOPHER R. GREEN, JUDITH A. GIERUT & MICHELE L. MORRISETTE Indiana University (Received 4 September 2009; revised 28 April 2010) Phonological chain shifts have been the focus of many theoretical, developmental, and clinical concerns. This paper considers an overlooked property of the problem by focusing on the typological properties of the widely attested ‘s>h>f’ chain shift involving the processes of Labialization and Dentalization in early phonological development. Findings are reported from a cross-sectional study of 234 children (ages 3 years; 0 months–7;9) with functional (nonorganic) phonological delays. The results reveal some unexpected gaps in the predicted interactions of these processes and are brought to bear on the evaluation of recent optimality theoretic proposals for the characterization of phonological interactions. A developmental modification to the theory is proposed that has the desired effect of precluding certain early-stage grammars. The proposal is further evaluated against the facts of another widely cited developmental chain shift known as the ‘puzzle>puddle>pickle’ problem (Smith 1973). 1. I NTRODUCTION A common phenomenon in both first- and second-language acquisition and in fully-developed languages is for phonological processes to participate in a chain shift (e.g. Moreton & Smolensky 2002, Jesney 2005, Dinnsen 2008b). Chain shifts typically involve two phonological processes that interact in such a way that they result in an opaque generalization (i.e. one that is not surface-true). This phenomenon has generated much discussion and contro- versy in the theoretical, developmental, and clinical literature over the years and has raised questions about the very nature of chain shifts.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of I-Umlaut in Old English
    An Analysis of I-Umlaut in Old English Meizi Piao (Seoul National University) Meizi Piao. 2012. An Analysis of I-Umlaut in Old English. SNU Working Papers in English Linguistics and Language X, XX-XX Lass (1994) calls the period from Proto-Germanic to historical Old English ‘The Age of Harmony’. Among the harmony processes in this period, i-umlaut has been considered as ‘one of the most far-reaching and important sound changes’ (Hogg 1992, Lass 1994) or as ‘one of the least controversial sound changes’ (Colman 2005). This paper tries to analyze i-umlaut in Old English within the framework of the Autosegmental theory and the Optimality theory, and explain how suffix i or j in the unstressed syllable cause the stem vowels in the stressed syllable to be fronted or raised. (Seoul National University) Keywords: I-umlaut, Old English, Autosegmental theory, vowel harmony Optimality theory 1. Introduction Old English is an early form of the English language that was spoken and written by the Anglo-Saxons and their descendants in the area now known as England between at least the mid-5th century to the mid-12th century. It is a West Germanic language closely related to Old Frisian. During the period of Old English, one of the most important phonological processes is umlaut, which especially affects vowels, and become the reason for the superficially irregular and unrelated Modern English phenomenon. I-Umlaut is the conditioned sound change that the vowel either moves directly forward in the mouth [u>y, o>e, A>&] or forward and up [A>&>e].
    [Show full text]
  • French Influence in Canadian English from the 18Th Century: from Words to Sounds? Julie Rouaud
    French Influence in Canadian English from the 18th century: from words to sounds? Julie Rouaud To cite this version: Julie Rouaud. French Influence in Canadian English from the 18th century: from words to sounds?. 12e colloque international PAC, Sep 2016, Aix-en-Provence, France. hal-01936077 HAL Id: hal-01936077 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01936077 Submitted on 27 Nov 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. French Influence in Canadian English from the 18th century: from words to sounds? Julie Rouaud julie.rouaud@univ-tlse2.fr Introduction: What is Canadian English? Canadian English is often described as: • Relatively homogeneous variety of English (Josselin-Leray, Durand, Lopez, 2015). • 2 sets of linguistic norms: similar to General American (e.g. rhotic variety), while retaining some British English features (e.g. suffix –ile [ail] unlike General American [Əl] in words like fragile). However Canadian English also has its specificity: • The linguistic situation in Canada has been complex from the 18th century (see map): • Built on colonization and immigration in addition to indigenous people. • Unique contacts between French and English facilitating linguistic interactions and mutual influence until now.
    [Show full text]
  • Chain Shifts in First Language Acquisition
    CHAIN SHIFTS IN FIRST LANGUAGE ACQUISITION MASTER’S THESIS BY FRANSIEN WALTON MASTER’S PROGRAMME TAAL, MENS EN MAATSCHAPPIJ TAALWETENSCHAP UNIVERSITY OF UTRECHT STUDENT NUMBER 0419273 SUPERVISOR PROF. DR. RENÉ KAGER SECOND READER PROF. DR. WIM ZONNEVELD 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE 5 1. INTRODUCTION 7 2. PREVIOUS RESEARCH 14 2.1 EARLY GENERATIVE GRAMMAR 15 2.1.1 SMITH (1973) 17 2.1.2 MACKEN (1980) 19 2.2 OPTIMALITY THEORY 21 2.2.1 INTRODUCTION TO OPTIMALITY THEORY 21 2.2.2 CHAIN SHIFTS IN OPTIMALITY THEORY 26 2.2.3 LOCAL CONSTRAINT CONJUNCTION 28 2.2.4 FAITHFULNESS TO INPUT PROMINENCE 39 2.2.5 OPTIMALITY THEORY WITH CANDIDATE CHAINS 52 2.2.6 UNDERSPECIFIED UNDERLYING REPRESENTATIONS 58 2.3 CONCLUSION 62 3. A NEW PROPOSAL 65 3.1 INDEPENDENT PROCESSES 68 3.2 ARTICULATORY DIFFICULTIES 70 3.3 UNDERLYING REPRESENTATIONS 74 3.4 MISPERCEPTION 79 3.5 PREDICTIONS REVISITED 83 3.6 CONCLUSION 86 4. DISCUSSION 88 5. CONCLUSION 103 REFERENCES 105 3 4 PREFACE The idea for this thesis originated in the course Phonological Acquisition taught by René Kager. I read the article On the characterization of a chain shift in normal and delayed phonological acquisition by Daniel Dinnsen and Jessica Barlow (1998) and was intrigued by the phenomenon. After I started reading more on the subject, I became increasingly unhappy with the proposed analyses in the literature and decided to dive deeper into the matter. The result is this thesis. I would like to thank René for his useful comments, critical questions and positive feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Unified Theory of Chain Shifting
    OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 04/29/12, NEWGEN !"#$%&' () TOWARD A UNIFIED THEORY OF CHAIN SHIFTING *#'+, -. ./,0/, !. I"#$%&'(#)%" Chain shifts play a major role in understanding the phonological history of English—from the prehistoric chain shift of Grimm’s Law that separates the Germanic languages from the rest of Indo-European, to the Great Vowel Shift that is often taken to define the boundary between Middle English and Early Modern English, to the ongoing chain shifts in Present-Day English that are used to estab- lish the geographical boundaries between dialect regions. A chain shift may be defined as a set of phonetic changes affecting a group of phonemes so that as one phoneme moves in phonetic space, another phoneme moves toward the phonetic position the first is abandoning; a third may move toward the original position of the second, and (perhaps) so on. Martinet (12(3) introduced the argument that chain shifts are caused by a need for phonemes to maintain margins of security between each other—so if a phoneme has more phonetic space on one side of it than on others, random phonetic variation will cause it to move toward the free space but not back toward the margins of security of phonemes on the other side. Labov (3414: chapter 5) gives a lucid exposition of the cognitive and phonetic argu- ments underlying this account of chain shifting. Despite their value as a descriptive device for the history of English, however, the ontological status of chain shifts themselves is a matter of some doubt. Is a 559_Nevalainen_Ch58.indd9_Nevalainen_Ch58.indd
    [Show full text]
  • English Grammar in American Schools Before 1850
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF EDUCATION BULLETIN, 1921, No. 12 ENGLISH GRAMMAR IN AMERICAN SCHOOLS BEFORE 1850 By ROLLO LAVERNE LYMAN THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO .e WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1922 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION NAT BE pm-let:Ran FROM THE SCPERINTICNDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 20 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Page. Introduction 5 Chapter I.Early instruction In the vernacular precedingEnglish gram- mar 11 1. Character of vernacular instruction In English. 1596-1422 12 2. Reasons for early emphasis on vernacular in America 15 3. Character of vernacular instruction in America. 1620-1720 17 Chapter IT. -Early apitearanes of English grammar inAmerica... 21 1. SChools and schoolmasters teaching Englishgrammar before 1775 ... 0 21 , 2. English grammars in America before 1781. 33 3. Early instruction in English grammar in Americancolleges 36 Chapter 11.1. - =Influences adding grammars to the curriculum 43 1. Franklin's English school 43 2. The influence of the Philadelphia English school 49 3. Educational theories supporting grammar in Americapp to 1775 .55 Chapter !V.The rapid rise of grammar after 1775 70 1. The legislative recognition of grammar 70 2. The flood of textbooks after 1784 77 3. The .extent of, lustruction in grammar th repre,entative.States. 1800 -1850 82 4. The status of grammhr. 1850 to 1870 02 Chapter S.Traditional rriethodh of teaching Lan grammar transferred to English grammar 103 1. Grammar as an art.. 105 2. Methods used in stadying Lily, and Latingrammar in general seventeenth century 107 3. Latin methods carried directly to Englishgrammar memorization 111 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Constraints in Phonological Acquisition
    1 Introduction: constraints in phonological acquisition René Kager, Joe Paten and Wim Zonneveld This volume presents ten studies in phonological first languageacquisition, an area of research that has become one of fast-growing importance in recent years. The reason for this is not just the fruitfulness and linguistic interest of this type of study per se: it is also thecase that the more we come to know about phonological development, by the analysis of growingnumbers of data collections and increasingly sophisticated experiments, themore the field has complied with the notion that acquisition research liesat the heart of the modern study of language. One of the aims of this introductionis to illustrate and discuss these developments. In line with them, thepast decade in phonology in particular has witnessed an upswell of productiveinteraction between empirical acquisition research and theory development. With thearrival and rise of constraint-based models, in particular Prince and Smolensky's(1993) Optimality Theory, phonological theory now providesa framework that meets the desiderata expressed more than two decadesago by Lise Menn (1980: 35-36), who is also a contributor to this volume: () ... The child'slonguetiedness',that overwhelming reality which Stampe and Jakobson both tried to capture with their respective formal structures, could be handled more felicitously if one represented the heavy articulatory limitations of the child by the formal device of output constraints I...1The child's gradual mastery of articulation then is formalized as a relaxation of those constraints. The rapid emergence of acquisition studies within OptimalityTheory reflects the general suitability of constraints for the formalisation ofdevelopmental limitations, as well as the usefulness of constraint ranking for expressingthe relaxation of these limitations.
    [Show full text]