DOCSLIB.ORG

California State Water Project Annual Report 1974 Department of Water Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California State Water Project Annual Report 1974 Department of Water Resources Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Agencies California Documents 1974 California State Water Project Annual Report 1974 Department of Water Resources Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies Part of the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation Department of Water Resources, "California State Water Project Annual Report 1974" (1974). California Agencies. Paper 215. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies/215 This Cal State Document is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Agencies by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Co ifornio State Water Project Annuo Report 1974 STATE OF CALIFORNIA The Resources Agency Department of Water Resources The Department of Water Resources is responsible for protectin::J and conserving California's water resources, for planning to meet California's water needs from all available sources 1 and for pro­ viding for public safety in relation to water resources. One of the Department's major responsibilities is the planning, construc­ tion, and operation of the State Water Project, a multipurpose project to develop certain of the State's water resources for water supply, hydroelectric power production, flood control, and recreation purposes. EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor, State of California CLAIRE T. DEDRICK, Secretary for Resources, The Resources Agency RONALD B. ROBIE, Director, Department of Water Resources I Contents History: '1951 to 1974 ........................... 5 ights of 1974 ..................................... 6 ............................................ 7 Deliveries ...................................... 8 Reservoirs ....................................... 10 Pumping Plants.... .... 12 Operations ....................................... 14 Plants. .15 ............................................ 16 ......................................... 18 . .......................... 19 ............................................. 20 ..................................... 22 December 31 1 1974 ....................... 24 <i 3 Co ifornio State Water Project Water, Flood Control, Hydroelectric Power and Recreation for Californians The State Water Project is a "multiple-purpose" project-one which provides for not only water supply but for a myriad of other uses, such as flood control; hydroelectric power; irrigation, mu­ nicipal and industrial uses; recreation; water quality improvement; and fish and wildlife protection. The Project originates in the northeastern part of California with the Upper Feather River lakes, which offer water recreation and fishery enhancement and provide water for municipal and irrigation purposes. Oroville Dam, the key water conservation facility of the Project, ~Antelope Lake controls Feather River flood waters, conserves water for release I 1964 Lake Dav1s' \.Frenchman lake downstream, supplies energy for power generation and provides a multitude of recreation opportunities at Lake Oroville. lak~g::.,ue - 1961 From Oroville, the water travels through natural channels until 1967 it reaches the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Through the North Bay Aqueduct, water is delivered to Napa County. The South Bay Aqueduct, one of the first operational units of the Project, conveys water for municipal and industrial uses in the southern San Francisco Bay Area. Lake Del Valle stores water for flood control, recreation OSACRAMENTO North Bay Aqueduct J and regulation of Aqueduct flow. 1968r ""-"-···· The California Aqueduct is one of the most spectacular features of the Project. Its main line extends 444 miles from the Delta to Riverside County in Southern California. In its initial stretch, the California Aqueduct carries water south along the western edge of the San Joaquin Valley where much of it is used to irrigate farmlands. By the time the remaining water reaches the southern end of the Valley, it has traveled approximately 300 miles and been elevated nearly 1200 feet. The water then is raised almost 2000 additional feet in a single lift to the first tunnel of the Tehachapi Crossing to bring water to Southern California. On the south side of the Tehachapi Mountains, the Aqueduct splits into two branches. The East Branch serves the Antelope Valley and parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange and San Diego counties. The West Branch serves the Los Angeles Basin and the southern coastal areas. In addition to facilities which provide water for municipal and industrial use and for power generation, the West Branch has two lakes, Castaic and Pyramid. The East Branch facilities provide power generation and water for municipal and industrial uses. This branch also has two lakes, Silverwood and Perris. The Project is not subsidized by the taxpayers. All costs are paid-with interest-by Project beneficiaries. LakePerns 1973 95 Bucket wheel excavator Earth mover 1962 water deliveries were made from facilities in the San Francisco Area work started on Dam since Father Junipero Serra came to what now Cali- on the Feather River work started on San Luis Joint-Use and founded Mission San de Alcala, have in the San realized that water would have to be conserved areas of water 1963 Work started on the California and moved to areas of water need. Court decisions validated prototype water mid-1930s it was clear that local water alone contract and reaffirmed the State's authority to issue take care of local needs and that a statewide water enue bonds to finance the was needed. 1964 First flood operation when com- for the con- Oroville Dam saved Yuba City and other downstream areas. servation and use of water could be and so 1965 Work on the Crossinq. with start of for the State Water Project were drawn to include Porter recreation as a major purpose, with flood control and hydro- Contract electric for payment to the State of 50,000 With long-term contracts program completed with 31 costs allocated to water conservation water deliveries in Feather River area, H the north San Francisco area, San 1969 Oroville-Thermalito Power began full opera- Lake Oroville and San Luis Reservoir filled for the first 1957 Pacific Rail- time . all features of the San Luis facilities in operation all features of South Bay in operation first access site along California Aqueduct. 1970 started on Perris the southern terminus of the California pleted Pearblossom and A. D. Edmondston operation . Silverwood and Castaic Lakes Dam construction started. and San Bernardino tunnels Act which powerplants stdfted generating electric enhancement of and wildlife power ... first repayment of principal on Revenue Bonds. Frenchman Dam and Lake­ 1973 Santa Ana Valley Pipeline completed to Lake Perris . with the provisions of the Davis- Perris Dam Dedication, signaling delivery of Project water to its most southerly point ... first repayment of principal on Project 5 obligation bonds. Highights of 1974 Alessdndro lsldnd Boating at Pyramid Lake Ldke Perris The California State Water Project moved another step closer to guaranteed by the utilities and banked an additional completion in 1974 with the filling of Lake Perris and Pyramid Lake. worth of energy. Both of these Project reservoirs were also opened for recreational The second of six 200,000 kilowatt use during the year. Of all the major Project lakes only Castaic the Castaic Powerplant, bringing the Lake has not been filled. 450,000 kW. During 1974, the Project transported a total of 2,446,607 acre­ At Lake Perris, a boat-in facility on Alessandro Island was com­ feet of water. (An acre-foot of water is 325,900 gallons.) Deliv­ pleted in February, as was the Dam, while a beach drainage modi­ eries to water contracting agencies totaled 1,324,860 fication was completed in April. Pyramid Dam was completed in an increase of 30 percent over '1973 deliveries. The Project also March. moved 1,121,747 acre-feet of federal Central Valley Project water A draft environmental impact report (EIR) on the Project's Delta through the joint facilities in the San Joaquin Valley. facilities, the proposed Peripheral Canal, was published in August, Water contractor deliveries and the percent of the total deliv­ and a series of public hearings were held to receive public com­ eries included: the San Joaquin Valley 895,375 acre-feet (68 ments. percent); San Francisco Bay area 97,122 acre-feet The Department participated in a feasibility study of a proposed Feather River area 17,258 acre-feet (1 percent); San Joaquin Nuclear Project in Kern County. The project is being California 315,105 acre-feet (24 percent). managed by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Of the total deliveries to State Water Project includes other California utilities. If such a plant is built, the 865,000 acre-feet were delivered for agricultural use. ment of Water Resources would own 10 percent of the increase of 180,000 acre-feet over 1973 deliveries. plant and 10 percent of the power generated. This would provide this agricultural use was in the South San Joaquin Valley. a portion of the power required for future operation of the State irrigated with Project water totaled 290,000, an increase of Water Project. A Department decision on project participation acres. The gross value of the crops raised, principally cotton, ex­ will not be made before mid-1976. ceeded $100 million. During 1974, the Department prepared plans and specifications A near-record
Load more

Recommended publications
  • System Reoperation Study
    System Reoperation Study Phase III Report: Assessment of Reoperation Strategies California Department of Water Resources August 2017 System Reoperation Study Phase III Report This page is intentionally left blank. August 2017 | 2 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................1 -1 1.1 Study Authorization ....................................................................................................................................................................................1 -1 1.2 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................................................................................1 -2 1.3 Planning Principles .....................................................................................................................................................................................1 -4 1.4 Related Studies and Programs...................................................................................................................................................................1 -4 1.5 Uncertainties in Future Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.5.1 Climate Change ..........................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into the Oroville Dam 2017 Spillway Incident
    geosciences Communication Insights into the Oroville Dam 2017 Spillway Incident Aristotelis Koskinas 1, Aristoteles Tegos 1,2,*, Penelope Tsira 1, Panayiotis Dimitriadis 1 , Theano Iliopoulou 1, Panos Papanicolaou 1, Demetris Koutsoyiannis 1 and Tracey Williamson 3 1 Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Heroon Polytechniou 9, Zografou, GR-15780 Zographou Athens, Greece; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (P.T.); [email protected] (P.D.); [email protected] (T.I.); [email protected] (P.P.); [email protected] (D.K.) 2 Arup Group Limited, 50 Ringsend Rd, Grand Canal Dock, D04 T6X0 Dublin 4, Ireland 3 Arup, 4 Pierhead Street, Cardiff CF10 4QP, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 December 2018; Accepted: 7 January 2019; Published: 11 January 2019 Abstract: In February 2017, a failure occurring in Oroville Dam’s main spillway risked causing severe damages downstream. A unique aspect of this incident was the fact that it happened during a flood scenario well within its design and operational procedures, prompting research into its causes and determining methods to prevent similar events from reoccurring. In this study, a hydroclimatic analysis of Oroville Dam’s catchment is conducted, along with a review of related design and operational manuals. The data available allows for the comparison of older flood-frequency analyses to new alternative methods proposed in this paper and relevant literature. Based on summary characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • (Entosphenus Tridentatus), California – Sacramento Regional Management Unit
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Arcata Fisheries Technical Report TR 2018-34 Regional Implementation Plan for Measures to Conserve Pacific Lamprey (Entosphenus tridentatus), California – Sacramento Regional Management Unit Damon H. Goodman and Stewart B. Reid U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office 1655 Heindon Road Arcata, CA 95521 (707) 822-7201 May 2018 Funding for this study was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Pacific Southwest Region Fish and Aquatic Conservation Program Office, with additional support provided by the Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office. This plan was developed as part of the Pacific Lamprey Conservation Initiative using information collected through: (1) regional stakeholder meetings hosted throughout the Sacramento Regional Management Unit in 2015-2017, (2) subsequent discussions with various stakeholders, and (3) the authors' experience. New information, as it becomes available, will be incorporated into subsequent revisions of this plan and posted on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office website. Disclaimers: The mention of trade names or commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the Federal Government. The Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office Fisheries Program reports its study findings through two publication series. The Arcata Fisheries Data Series was established to provide timely dissemination of data to local managers and for inclusion in agency databases. The Arcata Fisheries Technical Reports publishes scientific findings from single and multi-year studies that have undergone more extensive peer review and statistical testing. Additionally, some study results are published in a variety of professional fisheries and aquatic science journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Did You Know That the Water in Lake Del Valle Travels Through the South
    36x24TheWaterYouSwim.qxd:SB_aque signs 1/31/08 4:38 PM Page 1 Did you know The Water You Swim in Today... that the water in May be Your Drinking Water Next Week. Lake Del Valle It’s easy to help keep your water supply pure. travels through the Here are a few simple things you can do to protect your drinking water here at its source. South Bay Aqueduct and may eventually Keep diapers Do not feed wild animals. flow from the taps (and children Encouraging wildlife wearing them) to gather near the in your home? out of the lake. lake can contribute Dirty diapers and to bacteria in the drinking water water supply. If you live in the don’t mix! Livermore-Amador Valley, southern Alameda County, or Keep boats well-maintained. Santa Clara County, When swimming, Leaking fuel can take restroom breaks. contaminate That means getting the water you swim the water. out of the water and in today may be walking to the restroom. Need we say more? your drinking water next week! Dispose of trash properly. Litter can introduce a variety of pollutants to the water. This sign was produced through a Proposition 13 Non-point Source Pollution Control Grant from the State Water Resources Control Board by the South Bay Aqueduct Watershed Workgroup. If you live in the Your Tap Water Starts Here! Livermore-Amador Valley, southern Follow these simple guidelines and you'll be doing your part Alameda County, or to ensure a pure water supply for you and your neighbors. Santa Clara County, Lake Del Valle may When hiking, prevent erosion by respecting Replace lead fishing be the source of park signage in weights with non- environmentally lead alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Cvf-06-23-21-Issue
    SHARE LGBTQ HISTORY 3 6 P.M. THIS SATURDAY, AT THE CHABOT THEATER Pride Celebration CASTROCASTROA COMMUNITY VALLEYVALLEY NEWSPAPER SERVING CASTRO VALLEY SINCE FORUMFORUM 1989 YEAR 33 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 23, 2021 NO. 25 INSIDE YOUR FORUM Prolonged NEWS Effects of Drought Reading Game By Michael Singer County Library invites CASTRO VALLEY FORUM you to the 2021 Summer Reading Adventure California’s drought will do more than Page 2 prevent you from watering your lawn every day. It could also make your groceries more LIVING expensive and energy bills rise. Alameda County is currently in its second driest year since 1977 when water conserva- tion was at an all-time high. This is also the 10th driest year to date in 127 years, accord- ing to the California Department of Water PHOTO COURTESY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS Resources (DWR). AND THEY’RE OFF!: Four more weekends of live horse racing are on tap at the Alameda Statewide, 75 percent of California is con- County Fairgrounds in Pleasanton. Post time is 2:45 p.m. sidered in the most extreme levels of drought, Ah, Artichokes! also known as “exceptional drought.” These tasty artichoke The severe drought conditions mean water recipes are guaranteed to steal your heart shortages are widespread; surface water is depleted, and federal irrigation water deliveries Page 6 Live Horse Racing Returns are lower than in previous years, according to DWR. HEALTH Live horse racing is back at the Trackside Terrace is an open-air excitement of horse racing at the The dry conditions also mean food supplies Pleasanton Fairgrounds every Fri- outdoor dining experience with Stella Artois Grandstand.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2
    Simulation of Flows and Water Quality in the California Aqueduct Using DSM2 Siqing Liu, Bob Suits DWR, Bay Delta Office, Modeling Support Branch 2011 CWEMF Annual Meeting, February 28 –March 2 1 Topics • Project objectives • Aqueduct System modeled • Assumptions / issues with modeling • Model results –Flows / Storage, EC, Bromide 2 Objectives Simulate Aqueduct hydraulics and water quality • 1990 – 2010 period • DSM2 Aqueduct version calibrated by CH2Mhill Achieve 1st step in enabling forecasting Physical System Canals simulated • South Bay Aqueduct (42 miles) • California Aqueduct (444 miles) • East Branch to Silverwood Lake • West Branch to Pyramid Lake (40 miles) • Delta‐Mendota Canal (117 miles) 4 Physical System, cont Pumping Plants Banks Pumping Plant Buena Vista (Check 30) Jones Pumping Plant Teerink (Check 35) South Bay Chrisman (Check 36) O’Neill Pumping-Generating Edmonston (Check 40) Gianelli Pumping-Generating Alamo (Check 42) Dos Amigos (Check 13) Oso (West Branch) Las Perillas (Costal branch) Pearblossom (Check 58) 5 Physical System, cont Check structures and gates • Pools separated by check structures throughout the aqueduct system (SWP: 66, DMC: 21 ) • Gates at check structures regulate flow rates and water surface elevation 6 Physical System, cont Turnout and diversion structures • Water delivered to agricultural and municipal contractors through diversion structures • Over 270 diversion structures on SWP • Over 200 turnouts on DMC 7 Physical System, cont Reservoirs / Lakes Represented as complete mixing of water body •
    [Show full text]
  • CA-Waterways-Map.Pdf
    O R E G O N S rk m o it F h e dl R Mid . Goose Lake S o ut k h r o F C K l O O a m a N t h r Sa e c v r er i a Riv R m d e u A A aterways n o l t o o C c R W M E V A D i v e R i r r t v i e Some of the water you use every day has probably traveled T P r S S r i n i Trinity Lake ty M a d T T R iv er great distances and over high mountain ranges before reaching E UREKA R i v e r Shasta Lake Va n your faucet. This is because water is not always where we need R EDDING Du Clear zen Whiskeytown River Creek Lake Tunnel it. In California, most of the rain and snowfall is in the north. But Lake Antelope E Almanor Lake e l most of the people live in the south. The solution is to distribute S a R c i v r e a r m Corning R k Lake Frenchman e r n o Canal F Davis Lake the water to where it is needed through delivery systems such t o h t r o A R N rk Black i Fo v e e Butte r dl id as the State Water Project (SWP). Lake M Lake k N or F Oroville h t u So G Thermalito New Bullards The SWP delivers water from Lake Oroville in the north to the T Forebay and Bar Reservoir e h Lake Oroville Afterbay F e a a Visitors Center Indian m t h r a a e Valley e iv E R R r a San Francisco Bay area, the San Joaquin Valley, and Southern b u u Y Reservoir - s s i Clear Lake R a C i n o v e l u r S R sa i California.
    [Show full text]
  • Talk Next Week in Livermore on Geologic Beauty and Seismic Risk
    Thursday, January 19, 2017 VOLUME LIV, NUMBER 3 Your Local News Source Since 1963 SERVING DUBLIN, LIVERMORE, PLEASANTON, SUNOL Talk Next Week in Livermore on Geologic Beauty and Seismic Risk A prominent Stanford geologist ence to public audiences as well In an interview prior to his “I don’t want to frighten people, See Inside Section A will speak in Livermore next week as for his contributions to geology talk, he said that the presence of but I also don’t want to soothe Section A is filled with on the role that seismic dynamics over a career that has spanned more the San Andreas Fault system them,” he said of his upcoming information about arts, people, have played in bringing physical than four decades. has made Northern California a presentation. entertainment and special events. beauty and a diverse landscape to His talk, part of the Rae Dor- place of great natural beauty, with “My perspective is that just There are education stories, a Northern California, but also the ough Speaker Series, is scheduled bays, coastline, redwood trees and about everything we love about variety of features, and the arts risk of serious earthquake damage. to start at 7:30 p.m. next Thursday, mountains. It has also made the the Bay Area has been created by and entertainment and The geologist is Ross Stein, January 26, in Livermore’s Bank- region, including the Tri-Valley, a bulletin board. known for his ability to bring sci- head Theater. place of considerable risk. (See QUAKES, page 7) Flooding Closes Del Valle, Sycamore Grove The recent heavy rains have but it has a few times in the past flooded Lake Del Valle Park and years, said Castile.
    [Show full text]
  • Downstream of O'neill Forebay
    DSM2DSM2 CaliforniaCalifornia AqueductAqueduct ExtensionExtension Presented to California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum March 1, 2005 Introduction and Project Goals • CH2M HILL is constructing a DSM2 model of the California Aqueduct on behalf of DWR’s Municipal Water Quality Investigation (MWQI) program and the State Water Project Contractors • Goals: – Detailed evaluation of Aqueduct Hydrodynamics, Water Quality, and Operations – Forecasting short-term and long-term water quality – Potential for Real-time analysis of Water Quality throughout system Model Coverage and Geometry • The model includes – California Aqueduct, South Bay Aqueduct – East Branch to Silverwood Lake, West Branch to Pyramid Lake, – San Luis Reservoir and O’Neill Forebay, and – DMC from Tracy Pumping Plant to the Mendota Pool – 580 miles in total • EXCEL tool built to generate ASCII cross section files • Pipes and Tunnels treated as channels Model Area Model Schematic Boundary Conditions • Flow at Tracy and Banks • San Luis Reservoir Operations • DMC and O’Neill Forebay Operations • Diversions to South Bay Aqueduct and West Branch (pumping plant data) • Contractor Diversions Database • Mass Balance Closure Terms Application-specific issues • Treatment of Check Structures – gates and weirs to control elevation • Use of Object to Object programming – DSM2 tool that allows for instantaneous transfer of water from location to another • Flow into South Bay Aqueduct • O’Neill Pumping and Generating Flows • Gianelli Pumping and Generating Flows • Flow into South Bay
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Model Studies of the Flood Control Outlet and Spillway for Oroville Dam California Department of Water Resources State of California
    HYO 5 ·10 HYDRAULICS BRANCH tr1 OFFICIAL FIL E COP Y C '---­ .c-.1.v-=-ru-=-.cr-r--v:n-----r.1.~.1= JSE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES >- :c STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUREAU OF RF.CV,HTTON' HYDRAULIC L.ABORATORY, UNITED ST ATES ~ir-f1~r DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR lH ~i.JL BUREAU OF RECLAMATION WREN BOBB nww. p RETII:eU PROMPTLY, HYDRAULIC MODEL STUDIES OF THE FLOOD CONTROL OUTLET AND SPILLWAY FOR OROVILLE DAM CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES STATE OF CALIFORNIA Report No. Hyd-510 liydraulics Branch DIVISION OF RESEARCH OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER DENVER, COLORADO ·· - i September 30, 1965 r The information contained in this report may not be used in any publication, advertising, or other promotion in such a manner as to constitute an endorsement by the United States Government or the Bureau of Reclamation, either explicit or implicit, of any material, product, device, or process that may be referred to in the report. } '\ ,_.,_,·,· .·-.: \ ~' ... , ,- .. ""·· '\ . ··~. __,,...:.>-. l / .·,( . I ' . "'. 4 z PREFACE Hydraulic model studies of features of Oroville Dam were conducted in the Hydraulic Laboratory in Denver, Colorado. The studies were made under Contract No. 14-06-D-3399 between the California Depart­ ment of Water Resources and the Bureau of Reclamation. The basic designs were conceived and prepared by the Department of Water Resources engineers. Final designs were established through model studies that verified the adequacy of the basic designs, or led to modifications needed to obtain more satisfactory performance. During the course of the studies, Messrs. R. A. Hill, Chairman of the board of consultants; and A.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet
    Board of Directors Board Meeting Packet June 2, 2020 SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 2020 at 1:00 PM Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, effective March 31, 2020 and May 4, 2020, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing. Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at: https://youtu.be/CXk-sT1N2kg Public comments may be submitted one of three ways: 1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Monday, June 1, at 3:00pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Monday, June 1 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: https://zoom.us/j/92248099243.
    [Show full text]