Rails to Trails Index 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

City YR Number Rail to Trail Name Anacortes, WA YR0512 Tommy Thompson Trail Bellingham, WA YR1268 Railroad Trail Bellingham, WA YR2593 Hertz Trail Bellingham, WA YR0365 South Bay Trail Bellingham, WA YR0509 Interurban Trail Bellingham, WA YR1119 Hertz Trail (Lake Whatcom Trail) Bellingham, WA YR1142 Bay to Baker Trail Bellingham, WA YR2617 Interurban Trail Bothell, WA YR 1687 Burke Gilman Trail and Sammamish River Tral Buckley, WA YR0963 Foothills Trail Chehalis, WA YR0356 (Walk)Willapa Trail Chehalis, WA YR2210 (Bike) Willapa Trail Colfax, WA YR2307 Coeur d'Alene, ID YR0310 Walk- Trail of the Coeur d'Alene Coeur d'Alene, ID YR2075 Bike- Trail of the Coeur d-Alene Dupont, WA YR0193 Dupont Dynamite Trail Enumclaw, WA YR1076 Foothills Trail Issaquah WA YR0985 Rainier Trail Kent, WA YR0972 Interurban Trail Kent, WA YR2598 Interurban Trail Kirkland, WA YR0134 Eastside Rail Corridor Lacey, WA YR0586 (Walk) Chehalis Western Trail Lacey, WA YR1931 (Bike) Chehalis Western Trail Lake Forest Park,WA YR1144 Burke Gilman Trail Lyle, WA YR0139 Klickitat Trail Maple Valley, WA YR1328 Green-to-Cedar River Trail Moses Lake, WA YR1062 Columbia Basin RR Trail Newcastle, WA YR2052 Loop 2 - Coal Creek Trail North Bend, WA YR1008 Snoqualmie Valley Trail North Bend, WA YR1024 Iron Horse Trail (now Palouse to Cascade) Olympia, WA YR1009 Woodard Bay Trail Orting, WA YR0920 Foothills Trail (Includes bike also) Port Angeles, WA YR1428 Olympic Discovery Trail Port Angeles, WA YR1719 Olympic Discovery Trail Port Angeles, WA YR0361 Olympic Discovery Trail Port Townsend, WA YR1938 Olympic Discovery Trail Port Townsend, WA YR1673 Olympic Discovery Trail/Larry Scott Trail Redmond, WA YR1067 East Lake Sammamish Trail and Sammamish River Trail Renton, WA YR0895 Loop 1 -Cedar River Trail Loop 2 Eastside Rail Corridor Republic, WA SYR2591 Golden Tiger Trail Roslyn, WA SYR1565 Coal Mines Trail Seattle, WA YR1865 Burke Gilman Trail Seattle, WA YR0408 Burke Gilman Trail Seattle, WA YR1402 Burke Gilman Trail Seattle, WA YR0351 Burke Gilman Trail Seattle, WA YR0596 Alki Point 5K and 10K Seattle, WA YR0011 Seattle Waterways Trail - 10K Sequim, WA YR1054 Olympic Discovery Trail Sequim, WA YR1427 Olympic Discovery Trail Sequim, WA YR1939 Olympic Discovery Trail Shelton, WA YR2625 Shoreline, WA YR1390 Interurban Trail Shoreline, WA YR0354 Interurban Trail Snohomish, WA YR1855 Centennial Trail Snoqualamie, WA YR2245 Snoqualmie Valley Trail South Prairie, WA YR2589 Foothills Trail Spokane, WA YR2074 Bike- Centennial Trail Spokane, WA YR0024 Walk-Centennial Trail Tenino, WA YR0678 Yelm-Tenino Trail Tukwila, WA YR0120 Interurban Trail Tukwila, WA YR1293 Interurban Trail Yelm, WA YR1657 Yelm-Tenino Trail.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

R Egion Al T Rails S Ystem Trailfinder
Burke-Gilman Trail Elliott Bay Trail Snoqualmie Valley Trail Interurban Trail (North) Cedar River Trail he Regional Trails System in King County contains over 40 unique trails offering some 300 miles of distinc- tive greenways and off-street routes that allow travel from the Puget Sound to the Surface and Grade Soft-surface with a gentle grade that Surface and Grade Paved with a flat grade, follows follows the route of the historic Milwaukee Road railroad with Surface and Grade Paved with a gentle grade, follows Surface and Grade Paved for its first 12 miles until Cascade Mountains. Defined primarily by the route of the historic Seattle, Lake Shore and Eastern a 2.5-mile on-street detour around the Snoqualmie Mill site. the route of the historic Seattle-Everett Interurban Railway intersecting the Green-to-Cedar Rivers Trail and continues wide, paved trails or hard gravel paths Railway along Lake Union and Lake Washington. Surface and Grade Paved and flat, with a separate Length 31 miles, travels through the Snoqualmie Valley that operated in the early part of the 20th Century. as a soft-surface trail for its last 5 miles to Landsburg Park. Length 20 miles, stretches from Seattle to Bothell and pedestrian walking path that follows the trail through from Duvall to North Bend and on to Rattlesnake Lake Length 5 miles, links Seattle and Shoreline north to Length 17 miles, follows the gentle grade of the historic with gentle grades, they are perfect op- links with the Sammamish River Trail forming part of the Myrtle Edwards Park.
[Show full text]
AGENDA Finance Committee Meeting
AGENDA Finance Committee Meeting 3:30 PM - Monday, August 13, 2018 Council Conference Room, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way 1. Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up Renewal a) AB - 2184 Administrative Services Department requests authorization to execute the En Point Technology purchase order in the amount of $157,730.17 for the renewal of Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up. 2. Consortium Fiber Optic Project 73 Eastside Rail Corridor Feasibility Study a) AB - 2187 Administrative Services Department requests approval to execute Consortium Project Agreement 73, an interlocal agreement with the members of the Community Connectivity Consortium, regarding the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) fiber optic feasibility study. City of Renton share of the cost is $10,000. 3. Vouchers a) Accounts Payable b) Benefits' Deductions c) Payroll (located in Dropbox) 4. Emerging Issues in Finance AGENDA ITEM #1. a) AB - 2184 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up Renewal RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services Department STAFF CONTACT: Mehdi Sadri, Information Technology Director EXT.: 6886 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: As part of the 2017/2018 Budget, Council approved funds for the yearly renewal of IT's Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up renewal in the amount of $143,391.06 plus tax for a total of $157,730.17. SUMMARY OF ACTION: As part of the 2017/2018 IT Budget, Council approved funds for IT's yearly renewal of the Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-Up. Yearly cost is $143,391 plus 10% sales tax for a total of $157,730.17. IT requests authorization to renew.
[Show full text]
Eastside Rail Corridor Regional Trail Draft Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR REGIONAL TRAIL DRAFT MASTER PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT KING COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION FEBRUARY 2016 Dear Friends: In our rapidly developing region, we are fortunate to be able to preserve the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) in public ownership from Renton to Snohomish. The regional vision for the ERC is to develop a multi-use corridor that enhances mobility and connectivity, supports utility infrastructure needs, and provides recreational opportunities. Within this broader vision, the ERC offers a unique opportunity to create a nonmotorized (regional trail) connection between many vibrant, growing, and dynamic areas, providing a safe and enjoyable recreational experience for people of all ages and abilities and promoting healthy, livable communities. One day, it’s possible this corridor may connect from Vancouver WA to Vancouver BC. The intent is to develop a regional trail in the 15.6 miles of ERC under its ownership and the 1.1 miles of ERC owned by Sound Transit in which the County holds a trail easement that does not preclude future transit or utility use of the ERC, while meeting the following objectives: Connect Eastside communities by linking to: o Existing and planned regional and local trails o Transit centers, park and rides, and East Link light rail stations o Residential, commercial, and business centers Provide nonmotorized active transportation options and expand recreational opportunities to: o Benefit public health o Improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions o Expand access for underserved areas of King County Incorporate Eastside heritage and culture Support opportunities for economic development This Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is an important first step towards planning, environmental review, design, and construction of a regional trail in the corridor.
[Show full text]
WWRP Funding Scenerios
Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program 2015-2017 Critical Habitat Projects Grants Awarded at Different Legislative Funding Levels Number Grant Applicant Rank and Type Project Name Grant Applicant Request Match Total $40 Million $50 Million $60 Million $70 Million $80 Million $90 Million $95 Million $97 Million 1 14-1085A Mountain View Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 2 14-1096A Simcoe Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 3 14-1087A Mid Columbia-Grand Coulee Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $1,730,000 $2,166,500 $3,476,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 4 14-1090A Heart of the Cascades Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $785,500 $2,095,000 $3,404,500 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 5 14-1091A Cowiche Watershed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $2,200,000 $2,200,000 $59,250 $321,150 6 14-1089A Tunk Valley Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $2,000,000 $2,000,000 7 14-1099A Kettle River Corridor Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $1,000,000 $1,000,000 8 14-1609C Sage Grouse Habitat Acquisition in Deep Creek Foster Creek Conservation District $302,000 $303,152 $605,152 $20,502,000 $303,152 $20,805,152 $8,730,000 $9,166,500 $10,476,000 $11,785,500 $13,095,000 $14,404,500 $15,059,250 $15,321,150 Type Abbreviations:
[Show full text]
WASHINGTON STATE PARKS and RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Rd S.W
Don Hoch Director STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Rd S.W. • P.O. Box 42650 • Olympia, WA 98504-2650 • (360) 902-8500 TDD (Telecommunications Device for the Deaf): (360) 664-3133 www.parks.wa.gov STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Date of Issuance: January 14, 2019 Project Name: Klickitat Trail Development Proponent: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Lead Agency: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Description of proposal: This Klickitat Trail Development project continues previous trail planning and improvement work completed by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and Washington State Parks. This is the first phase of a phased environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) that expands on the previous 2003 Environmental Assessment prepared by the USFS, and adopted by Washington State Parks in 2005 as the document used for the original Determination of Non-significance (DNS) to satisfy SEPA requirements. This phased review specifically addresses updated site information identified since the original review, and new information for project modifications or new projects not previously reviewed. Phase 1 of this project proposes to construct a trailhead at Pitt and resurface approximately 12 miles of trail through Swale Canyon. Work also includes minor structural repairs, new decking and railings on seven existing trestles, replacement of one trestle with a free span bridge, and removal of one existing damaged trestle in Swale Canyon. Additionally, a preliminary concept for a potential trailhead at Warwick will be completed. Location of Proposal: Project activities will occur along portions of the Klickitat State Park Trail right-of-way corridor in Klickitat County.
[Show full text]
Scoping Summary Report
Regional Transit Long-Range Plan Update Scoping Summary Report February 2014 Scoping Summary Report Contents 1 Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 Purpose of Report ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 3 Long-Range Plan Update Process ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4 Scoping Process Description ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 4.1 Public notices --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 4.2 Public scoping meetings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 4.3 Agency scoping ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 4.4 Other outreach ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 4.5 Comment opportunities --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5 Summary of Comments ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5.1 Overview of comments --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 5.2 Comments from agencies, tribes, and jurisdictions ---------------------------------------------- 10 5.2.1 Washington State Department of Ecology ----------------------------------------------- 10 5.2.2
[Show full text]
Washington State's Scenic Byways & Road Trips
waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS inSide: Road Maps & Scenic drives planning tips points of interest 2 taBLe of contentS waShington State’S Scenic BywayS & Road tRipS introduction 3 Washington State’s Scenic Byways & Road Trips guide has been made possible State Map overview of Scenic Byways 4 through funding from the Federal Highway Administration’s National Scenic Byways Program, Washington State Department of Transportation and aLL aMeRican RoadS Washington State Tourism. waShington State depaRtMent of coMMeRce Chinook Pass Scenic Byway 9 director, Rogers Weed International Selkirk Loop 15 waShington State touRiSM executive director, Marsha Massey nationaL Scenic BywayS Marketing Manager, Betsy Gabel product development Manager, Michelle Campbell Coulee Corridor 21 waShington State depaRtMent of tRanSpoRtation Mountains to Sound Greenway 25 Secretary of transportation, Paula Hammond director, highways and Local programs, Kathleen Davis Stevens Pass Greenway 29 Scenic Byways coordinator, Ed Spilker Strait of Juan de Fuca - Highway 112 33 Byway leaders and an interagency advisory group with representatives from the White Pass Scenic Byway 37 Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife, Washington State Tourism, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and State Scenic BywayS Audubon Washington were also instrumental in the creation of this guide. Cape Flattery Tribal Scenic Byway 40 puBLiShing SeRviceS pRovided By deStination
[Show full text]
Chainwheel Chatter the Monthly Newsletter of B.I.K.E.S
www.bikesclub.org B.I.K.E.S. Club of Snohomish County Chainwheel Chatter The Monthly newsletter of B.I.K.E.S. Club of Snohomish County Your Snohomish County Cycling Club A PRIL 2 0 1 8 VOL . 4 6 3 Next B.I.K.E.S. Club meeting on April 12th @ 7:00 pm Prez Sez RIDE GUIDE PACE Get Squeaky about “Improvements” Easy under 10 mph Social 10–12 mph It was 8 years ago that Dan Scott was hit by a truck as he entered Marysville Steady 12-14 mph on his bike from northbound SR 529. His injuries were severe and recovery lengthy Moderate 14-16 mph (but he has certainly returned to form!). No one should have to risk such a crash due Brisk 16-18 mph to driver inattention, car speeds, or poor road design. Strenuous > 18 mph Many bicyclists hate riding on SR 529 between Everett and Marysville. There TERRAIN are old bridges with narrow walkways, heavy traffic, and high speeds. Now a new pro- “A” Mostly flat: Flat or ject threatens to make riding there even worse. gentle grades only (trails, Last week Dan and I met with a team from the Washington State Department Norman Rd) of Transportation that is designing a new interchange to bring cars off I-5 northbound “B” Rolling: Most climbs and onto SR 529 entering Marysville. The “Improvement” project does other things are short and easy (for car drivers), but that is the relevant part for people who bike and walk in the (Granite Falls, Kitsap) area.
[Show full text]
Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study 2017
TOWN OF DEDHAM HERITAGE RAIL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY 2017 PLANNING DEPARTMENT + ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully recognize the Town of Dedham’s dedicated Planning and Environmental Department’s staff, including Richard McCarthy, Town Planner and Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator, each of whom helped to guide this feasibility study effort. Their commitment to the town and its open space system will yield positive benefits to all as they seek to evaluate projects like this potential rail trail. Special thanks to the many representatives of the Town of Dedham for their commitment to evaluate the feasibility of the Heritage Rail Trail. We also thank the many community members who came out for the public and private forums to express their concerns in person. The recommendations contained in the Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study represent our best professional judgment and expertise tempered by the unique perspectives of each of the participants to the process. Cheri Ruane, RLA Vice President Weston & Sampson June 2017 Special thanks to: Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator Richard McCarthy, Town Planner Residents of Dedham Friends of the Dedham Heritage Rail Trail Dedham Taxpayers for Responsible Spending Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Community Outreach and Public Process 3. Base Mapping and Existing Conditions 4. Rail Corridor Segments 5. Key Considerations 6. Preliminary Trail Alignment 7. Opinion of Probable Cost 8. Phasing and Implementation 9. Conclusion Page | 2 Introduction and Background Weston & Sampson was selected through a proposal process by the Town of Dedham to complete a Feasibility Study for a proposed Heritage Rail Trail in Dedham, Massachusetts.
[Show full text]
Logan Avenue Trail Transitions to On- Street Bike Lanes
PROJECT REVIEW Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Project Review • Update to the 2009 Plan • Update to new development and current planning efforts • Collaborate with King County on regional trail connections • Incorporate new facility types and preferred routes • Maintain eligibility for grant funding 2 PROJECT REVIEW Goals Goal A: Improving safety Improve safety for non‐motorized use and facilities. Goal B: Creating an accessible and connected system. Develop an inter‐connected trail network. Goal C: Promoting physical and environmental health. Improve the health of the community through sustainable design and increase the rates of walking, running and bicycling. Goal D: Achieving equity Ensure that all members of the community have equal access to walking and bicycling facilities. Goal E: Enhancing the economy and community Enhance the economy and vibrancy of the community by increasing walking and bicycling. 3 PROJECT REVIEW Schedule 2017 2018 May June July August September October November December January February Meetings and Public C S P S P C S P C C Events Project TAC Meeting Open House TAC Meeting Open House Project TAC Meeting Open House Draft Plan Plan Introduction #1 Meeting #1 #2 Meeting #2 Update #3 Meeting #3 Presentation Adoption Interactive Map and Survey Draft Master Plan Final Master Plan 4 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Open House #1 Eastside Rail Corridor Alignment “Preferred alignment along Houser Way” “Houser Way is a good potential trail route from Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park to the Cedar River Trail. Houser Way
[Show full text]
WWRP Grants 2019-2021
Grants Awarded Critical Habitat Category Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program 2019-2021 Project Number and Applicant Rank Score Type1 Project Name Grant Applicant Grant Request Match Total Grant Awarded 1 44.29 18-1334A Cowiche Watershed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 2 41.14 18-1452A Spiva Butte Preserve Chelan-Douglas Land Trust $341,900 $344,900 $686,800 $341,900 3 38.86 18-1277A Mount Adams Klickitat Canyon Phase 3 Columbia Land Trust $3,000,000 $4,232,900 $7,232,900 $3,000,000 4 38.14 18-1358A Oregon Spotted Frog Conservation Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 5 37.86 18-1371C Cashmere Canyon Preserve Chelan-Douglas Land Trust $977,426 $2,061,331 $3,038,757 $977,426 6 36.57 18-1333A South Sound Prairies Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 7 32.71 18-1791A Twisp Uplands Conservation Easements Methow Conservancy $2,056,622 $2,056,622 $4,113,244 $427,319 2 8 32.29 18-1336A Simcoe Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,235,000 $4,235,000 Alternate 9 29.14 18-1340A Goat Mountain Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $155,000 $155,000 Alternate 10 28.43 18-1357A Hoffstadt Hills Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Alternate $21,865,948 $8,695,753 $30,561,701 $12,846,645 1Project Types: A=Acquisition C=Combination 2Partial funding Recreation and Conservation Funding Board Resolution 2019-24 Preliminary Ranking Critical Habitat Projects Washington Wildlife and Recreation
[Show full text]
Central Puget Sound Regional Open Space Strategy
A Regional Open Space Strategy for the Central Puget Sound Region DECEMBER 2016 Regional Open Space Strategy (ROSS) UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON UW Green Futures Research & Design Lab A Regional Open Space Strategy for the Central Puget Sound Region December 2016 Prepared by: Regional Open Space Strategy (ROSS) Project Staff University of Washington Green Futures Research and Design Lab 242 Gould Hall Seattle, WA 98195 206-685-0521 www.openspacepugetsound.org Co-Directors: Nancy Rottle, RLA, FASLA, Green Futures Research and Design Lab John Owen, AIA, MAKERS Architecture and Urban Design Digital versions of this report and its full appendices can be downloaded from the project website: openspacepugetsound.org This report was prepared with the generous support of: The Bullitt Foundation http://www.bullitt.org The Russell Family Foundation http://www.trff.org/ This report and its appendices have been developed by the UW Green Futures Lab Regional Open Space Strategy staff, its project partners, and volunteer contributors over the course of six years, 2010- 2016. This report should not be considered an agreement by its funders, members of the Executive Committee, or project contributors. It is hoped that the research, proposed strategies, and planning tools contained herein will support creation of a conserved and enhanced open space system for our region. Professional staff and partners during the project’s life have been: ROSS PROFESSIONAL TEAM PARTNERS Resource Media UW GREEN FUTURES LAB STAFF Brendan McLaughlin Nancy Rottle, ROSS Co-Director Gregory Heller John Owen, ROSS Co-Director Marcela Gara Ikuno Masterson, Sr. Planner Jeffrey W. Raker, Sr. Planner Earth Economics Jonathan Childers, Sr.
[Show full text]