DOCSLIB.ORG

SHELAA 2019 20 V11 Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SHELAA 2019 20 V11 Final Tameside Council | Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment 2020 – 2037 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Prepared by Planning Policy Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council PO Box 304 Ashton-under-Lyne Tameside OL6 0GA ............................................................................. Main contributors Simon Pateman Laura Smith Patrick Rushton ………………………………………………………. Issued By Jeff Upton – Interim Assistant Director - Planning and Transportation Approved By Cllr Gerald Cooney – Executive Member - Housing, Planning and Employment Jayne Traverse – Director of Growth Status Amended Publication Version ………………………………………………………… Copyright Ordnance Survey mapping produced under licence; Crown copyright and database rights 2020 Ordnance Survey 100022697 ………………………………………………………… Document Management No. Details Date 1.0 Final Draft 25 November 2020 2.0 Final Publication Version 06 January 2021 3.0 Amended Publication Version 01 September 2021 …………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… i Tameside Council | Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment 2020 – 2037 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Executive Summary The 2020 Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (SHELAA) provides an up to date picture of the supply of land for housing and economic development for the period 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2037. The assessment has been prepared in accordance with national planning policy and guidance and will be used to inform the preparation of both the Tameside Local Plan and the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework. This SHELAA provides a review of the sites identified in the 2017/18 SHELAA and takes account of completions on all sites with a planning permission at 31 March 2020. In addition, it includes new sites with planning permission and reviews the small site windfall allowance in order to complete the overall residential land supply picture for the next 17 years. Of the 1,145 residential sites assessed 305 were deemed to have the potential to deliver 6,440 gross additional dwellings. Taking into account projected losses and the annual small sites windfall allowance then the potential supply is 6,923 net additional dwelling for the 17 year period. For the office, industry and warehousing land supply, 25 sites have been identified with the potential to yield a net 95,962 square metres of floorspace. This is derived from a combination of extant planning permissions and vacant employment land identified through the Council’s annual monitoring. Similarly, the supply of retail floorspace is also included and this yields a potential gross 5,815 square metres and is accounted for by a single site. …………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ii Tameside Council | Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment 2020 – 2037 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Contents 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scope of the Assessment ................................................................................. 2 3.0 Methodology ..................................................................................................... 2 Stage 1: Site and Broad Location Identification ...................................................... 4 Stage 2: Site/Broad Location Assessment – Estimating the Development Potential ................................................................................................................................ 8 Stage 3: Windfall Assessment .............................................................................. 17 Stage 4: Assessment Review ............................................................................... 18 4.0 Assessment Findings ..................................................................................... 18 5.0 Relationship to the Draft 2020 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework......... 31 6.0 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 33 Appendix 1: Residential Densities 1 April 2015 - 31 March 2020 ............................. 35 Major Development Sites of 10+ Houses .............................................................. 35 Major Development Sites of 10+ Apartments ........................................................ 41 Major Development Sites of 10+ Mixed (Housing and Apartments) Dwellings ..... 46 Appendix 2 - Accessibility Mapping .......................................................................... 50 Appendix 3 - Information held for each site .............................................................. 51 Appendix 4 - SHELAA Call for Sites Form ............................................................... 58 Appendix 5 – List of SHELAA Housing Sites ............................................................ 63 2020 – 2025 Residential Supply List ..................................................................... 64 2025 – 2030 Residential Supply List ..................................................................... 97 2030 – 2037 Residential Supply List ................................................................... 107 Appendix 6 – List of SHELAA Employment Sites ................................................... 112 Office Sites List 2020 – 2037 .............................................................................. 113 Industry and Warehousing Sites List 2020 – 2037 .............................................. 114 Appendix 7 – List of SHELAA Retail Sites .............................................................. 115 Retail Sites List 2020 – 2037 .............................................................................. 116 Appendix 8 – Discounted Residential Sites ............................................................ 117 Appendix 9 – SHELAA Glossary of Terms ............................................................. 135 …………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… iii Tameside Council | Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment 2020 – 2037 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. …………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… iv Tameside Council | Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment 2020 – 2037 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Paragraph 59 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2019 (NPPF) states that in order to support the Government’s objective of significantly boosting the supply of homes, it is important that a sufficient amount and variety of land come forward where it is needed, that the needs of groups with specific housing requirements are addressed and that land with permission is developed without unnecessary delay. 1.2 In order for strategic plan making authorities to have a clear understanding of the land available in their area, paragraph 67 of the NPPF advises they prepare a strategic housing land availability assessment (SHLAA) to identify a sufficient supply and mix of sites, taking into account their availability, suitability and likely economic viability. Paragraph 67 also states that planning policies should identify a supply of: a) Specific, deliverable sites for years one to five of the plan period, and b) Specific, developable sites or broad locations for growth, for years 6-10 and, where possible, for years 11-15 of the plan. 1.3 Paragraph 80 of the NPPF states that significant weight should be placed on the need to support economic growth and productivity, taking into account both local business needs and wider opportunities for development. Paragraph 81 of the NPPF states that planning policies should set out a clear economic vision and strategy to encourage sustainable economic growth, set criteria, or identify strategic sites to meet anticipated needs over the plan period and seek to address potential barriers to investment. In addition paragraph 82 advises that planning policies and decisions should recognise and address specific locational requirements of different sectors. 1.4 The NPPF no longer suggests that reviews of land for economic development should be undertaken at the same time, or combined with, SHLAAs. However, in order to provide a comprehensive picture of the land supply in Tameside the Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (SHELAA) combines residential, industry, warehousing, office and retail land availability. 1.5 Having regard to the above, Tameside Council has produced this combined SHELAA that identifies the potential future supply of land for housing and economic development for the 17 year period 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2037 in line with the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) plan period. 1.6 The purpose of the SHELAA is to: Identify sites and broad locations with potential for housing and economic development; Assess their development potential; Assess their suitability for development and the likelihood of development coming forward (i.e. their ‘availability’ and ‘achievability’); and Inform the preparation of Tameside Council’s emerging Local Plan and the GMSF. …………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Tameside Council | Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment 2020 – 2037 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1.7 The assessment will form a key part of the evidence base used to inform policies in these development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peak Sub Region
    Peak Sub Region Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment Final Report to Derbyshire Dales District Council, High Peak Borough Council and the Peak District National Park Authority June 2009 ekosgen Lawrence Buildings 2 Mount Street Manchester M2 5WQ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 5 STUDY INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 5 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY AREA ............................................................................................... 5 ROLE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................ 8 REPORT STRUCTURE.............................................................................................................. 10 2 SHLAA GUIDANCE AND STUDY METHODOLOGY..................................................... 12 SHLAA GUIDANCE................................................................................................................. 12 STUDY METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................... 13 3 POLICY CONTEXT.......................................................................................................... 18 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 18 NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Contemporary Archaeologies of Social Housing: Changing Experiences of the Modern and New, 1870 to Present
    Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Emma Dwyer School of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester 2014 Thesis abstract: Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Emma Dwyer This thesis has used building recording techniques, documentary research and oral history testimonies to explore how concepts of the modern and new between the 1870s and 1930s shaped the urban built environment, through the study of a particular kind of infrastructure that was developed to meet the needs of expanding cities at this time – social (or municipal) housing – and how social housing was perceived and experienced as a new kind of built environment, by planners, architects, local government and residents. This thesis also addressed how the concepts and priorities of the Victorian and Edwardian periods, and the decisions made by those in authority regarding the form of social housing, continue to shape the urban built environment and impact on the lived experience of social housing today. In order to address this, two research questions were devised: How can changing attitudes and responses to the nature of modern life between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries be seen in the built environment, specifically in the form and use of social housing? Can contradictions between these earlier notions of the modern and new, and our own be seen in the responses of official authority and residents to the built environment? The research questions were applied to three case study areas, three housing estates constructed between 1910 and 1932 in Birmingham, London and Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hattersley and Mottram Housing Estate: an Evaluation of Its Regeneration
    Heseltine Institute for Public Policy, Practice and Place The Hattersley and Mottram housing estate: An evaluation of its regeneration Report summary Produced for Onward Homes by Dr Paul Hepburn and Dr Matthew Thompson, University of Liverpool May 2018 REPORT HEADLINES | 3 REPORT HEADLINES In October 2017, the Heseltine Institute was commissioned by Onward Homes to evaluate the impact of interventions made by Peak Valley Housing Association (PVHA) in the regeneration of Hattersley and Mottram, a large former council housing estate in Greater Manchester. This evaluation is a snapshot of an ongoing process of regeneration, which has a further 10 years to run, that aims to provide lessons for Onward, the wider housing sector, policy makers in local and central government. Our evaluation found that the regeneration interventions have been There are many lessons for future regeneration projects such as this. largely successful and significant progress has been made in meeting Referred to frequently by interviewees as a singular ‘act of genius’, the original objectives of the ‘Collaboration Agreement’, the founding the Collaboration Agreement has been the cornerstone of the legal document for the regeneration partnership. The quality of regeneration programme, leveraging in private sector investment to housing stock has been considerably improved – both the upgrading pay for transformations to the estate’s housing, retail, community and of existing stock and the construction of new housing. There is now a transport infrastructures while retaining public control of the land and greater mix of tenures with an unprecedented increase in new-build regeneration process. Much too can be learnt from the ‘relational’ owner occupation, and all housing stock now meets the Decent Homes as opposed to ‘transactional’ approach of PVHA which has been Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hattersley and Mottram Housing Estate: an Evaluation of Its Regeneration
    Heseltine Institute for Public Policy, Practice and Place The Hattersley and Mottram housing estate: An evaluation of its regeneration Produced for Onward Homes by Dr Paul Hepburn and Dr Matthew Thompson, University of Liverpool May 2018 2 | THE HATTERSLEY AND MOTTRAM HOUSING ESTATE: AN EVALUATION OF ITS REGENERATION CONTENTS | 3 Contents List of figures Report headlines ........................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Figure 1 Aerial view over the Hattersley estate, looking west towards Manchester city centre ..................................................................................... 15 Report summary .........................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Figure 2 Map showing Hattersley’s location ....................................................................................................................................................................................17 The Collaboration Agreement .................................................................................................................................................................................8 Figure 3 The original outline plan for the Hattersley overspill estate .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DAS Volume 1
    Alton Estate Regeneration Alton Estate Regeneration Hybrid Application Hybrid Application STATEMENT DESIGN, OF COMMUNITY LANDSCAPE & INVOLVEMENT ACCESS STATEMENT Communications Potential Hawkins\Brown, Barton Willmore May 2019 (Design), Tate Hindle & Gillespies May 2019 Contents VOLUME ONE - INTRODUCTION & EXISTING CONTEXT VOLUME TWO - THE MASTERPLAN 01 Introduction 05 The Masterplan 1.1 Client and Consultant Team 5.1 Estate-Wide Vision 1.2 Introduction 5.2 Landscape Masterplanning Principles 1.3 Vision and Aspiration 5.3 Intervention Area Masterplan Vision 1.4 Key Figures 5.4 Intervention Area Masterplan Details 1.5 Application Area 06 Landscape Character Areas 02 Site and Context Appraisal 6.1 Introduction 2.1 Site Location 6.2 Public Realm - Urban Quarter 2.2 Historic Patterns of Development 6.3 Public Realm - Parkland Quarter 2.3 The Existing Estate 6.4 Streetscape 2.4 Building Heights and Topography 6.5 Courtyards 2.5 Character Areas 6.6 Playhubs 2.6 Heritage and Conservation 2.7 Understanding the Surrounding Context 07 Hard Materials Strategy 2.8 Physical and Urban Context 7.1 Introduction 2.9 Existing Green Space 7.2 Public Realm - Urban Quarter 2.10 Transport Connections and Movement 7.3 Public Realm - Parkland Quarter 2.11 Site Opportunities 7.4 Streetscape 2.12 Site Constraints 7.5 Courtyards 7.6 Playhubs 03 Planning Context 3.1 Planning Policy Context 3.2 Understanding the Previous Masterplan 3.3 Understanding the Roehampton SPD 04 Consultation 4.1 Consultation Timeline 4.2 Design Review Panel Hawkins\Brown © | May 2019 | 9028
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies in Interwar Housing at Welwyn Garden City, Becontree and St
    Complete Communities or Dormitory Towns? Case Studies in Interwar Housing at Welwyn Garden City, Becontree and St. Helier Matthew David Benjamin Submitted to the University of Hertfordshire in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts by Research January 2016 Revised August 2016 Supervisors: Dr. Katrina Navickas, School of Humanities Dr. Susan Parham, School of Humanities 1 Abstract Housing has always been a paramount issue; in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century attempts were made to revolutionise the problem of poor quality houses and the accompanying poor quality of life. This was set against the backdrop of the industrial expansion of the urban metropolis; with possible solutions moving towards decentralisation of the most overpopulated areas. Arguably the most significant steps to remedy the housing issue were made in the interwar period with the development of the second Garden City at Welwyn and the London County Council out of county estates. This thesis focuses on the development of community at the three developments chosen as case studies: Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire and the Becontree Estate in Essex and the St. Helier Estate in Surrey. Key points of analysis were identified and investigated using a range of sources in order to come to a just conclusion. It was found that community values developed substantially over the early stages of growth, not without some examples of friction between existing and new residents. The development of public facilities such as churches, schools, public houses, community centres aided the progression of core community values through all three case studies. The development of these community hubs supported the progression of civic cohesion and pride, thus making the residents feel comfortable in their new surroundings and part of something bigger than themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Erdington High Street – Future High Streets Fund WORKING DRAFT
    Erdington High Street – Future High Streets Fund WORKING DRAFT - FULL BUSINESS CASE (FBC) Version Working Draft V2 Version Date 17th March 2020 Lead Author Birmingham City Council Place Erdington High Street Senior Responsible Officer within Local Authority Wayne Pell-Walpole (SRO) SRO Sign-off Name: Date: Page 1 of 56 MHCLG Full Business Case PROJECT SUMMARY In no more than 500 words, please provide an overall summary of your proposed project. Local Authority: Birmingham City Council High Street: Erdington High Street Brief summary of proposal: The Future High Street Fund (FHSF) will be used to facilitate a transformation of Erdington High Street into a thriving centre, providing new start up business incubation space, housing, cultural, leisure and social activities for all ages as well as improved urban realm and physical and social connectivity within the area. The fund will support a small number of transformative initiatives which will contribute to the longer term and wider vision for the high street. The shortlisted schemes include: • the redevelopment of a former swimming baths into a Community and Enterprise Hub which will house spaces for community activities and events, incubation office space and specialist advisors to support business start-ups. • the redevelopment Central Square Shopping Centre into mixed use residential (private rental), with ground floor food and beverage and a new public square/space linked directly to the High Street; • urban realm and accessibility/connectivity enhancements within the High Street, including improved pedestrianisation and enhanced footways in the middle section of the High Street and public space/village green to the north along with measures to slow vehicular traffic and improve public realm; and • upgrading the public footpath through St Barnabas Churchyard, adding disabled access and lighting to make it accessible and safe at night, and improving the churchyard into a public greenspace.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of Council Housing
    Homes Fit for Heroes: Council Housing in Britain 1919-2019 Professor Steve Schifferes Gresham Lecture 3 February 2020 The Puzzle of Council Housing • Britain’s story of public housing is unique • No major developed country built more council housing as proportion of its total housing stock in the 50 years to 1971 • But no country dismantled its system of public housing so quickly and drastically as Britain from the 1980s Path Dependence • Decisions and structures in the 1920s set the pattern for decades to come • Major debate on council housing in 1970s • New paradigm emerged in 1980s that has endured until the present • Are we now at another turning point? Conventional wisdom.. Building council housing Selling council housing • wartime shortage of housing • desire of most people to be • slum conditions and insecurity owner occupiers for most working class tenants • burden on taxpayer of subsidies • growing sense of social for council house builidng responsibility by govt • poorly designed and unpopular council estates …or myths? • Building council housing • Selling council housing • Social responsibility? Needs clear • Design flaws? many years before effective action • Most council houses were not high- • Wartime shortages? rise tower blocks • Consensus on building continued for • Owner-occupation? 50 years • Already growing fast due to easier • Poor housing conditions? mortgages • Change came only after struggle by • Cheaper for govt? tenants • Housing benefit cost more than building new homes Broader approach needed • Bring in political
    [Show full text]
  • Housing the Workers Early London County Council Housing 1889-1914
    Housing the Workers Early London County Council Housing 1889-1914 Martin Stilwell August 2015 Part 4 – Conclusions _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Early LCC Housing – Part 4 Page 1 of 10 © Martin Stilwell 2015 The Legacy The LCC continued with major building programmes after WW1 and the unfinished pre-WW1 garden estates were completed. The blocks built between the wars were similar to those built in the 1900s with the only obvious visual difference being that those with external walkways usually had the balcony walls in brick rather than the iron railings of the earlier blocks. All blocks were designed to have a fairly plain but solid neo-Georgian look with regularly-placed symmetrical windows, but few of the Art and Crafts-influenced design features to the roofs or windows that were present in the earlier blocks. Fig. 1: All the LCC housing developments to 1937i As can be seen from the red dots in Fig. 1 above, a considerable number of blocks were built. The first major post-WW1 block development was to continue with the Tabard Street improvement in Southwark which resulted in the Tabard Garden Estate (all blocks, despite the name). Blocks were also built in Hughes Field Deptford to accompany those built before WW1. Some schemes were very large for blocks-only developments. As examples, Clapham Park Estate (1930-36) was on 16 acres and provided for 4,900 people, and Honor Oak, Brockley (1932-24) was on 30 acres and provided for 6,800 people. Although these estates are physically large, their density per acre was much lower that for Boundary Street (368/acres on 15 acres) and Millbank (443/acre on 10 acres).
    [Show full text]
  • Roehampton Community Capacity Report 2018
    1 Contents Overview .............................................................................. 2 1. Background...................................................................... 6 2. People living in the area ................................................ 10 3. Community groups and local organisations ................. 16 4. Levels of community capacity ...................................... 20 5. Community involvement ................................................ 25 6. Conclusion ..................................................................... 28 Appendix 1 ......................................................................... 30 Appendix 2 ......................................................................... 31 Appendix 3 ......................................................................... 42 Appendix 4 ......................................................................... 46 Appendix 5 ......................................................................... 48 Published 2018 2 Overview The aim of the Alton, Putney Vale and Lennox community capacity report is to provide an overview of some of the communities that exist within these localities as well as local organisations and groups to assess current levels of community capacity and cohesion. There have been significant changes in the three areas over recent decades some that have been positive and others that have been negative in nature. How the communities develop and work together to maximise a sustainable, strong and cohesive locality will be a
    [Show full text]
  • Dover House Estate Conservation Area Appraisal CONTENTS
    14 Dover House Estate Conservation Area Appraisal CONTENTS Introduction 3 Character Statement 5 1.0 Character analysis 5 2.0 Location and Context 6 3.0 History and Archaeology 6 4.0 Topography 13 5.0 Layout and Landscape 13 6.0 Green Elements and Public Realm 15 7.0 Building Design and materials 17 7.2 Roof types 18 7.4 Roofing materials 18 7.5 Wa l l s 22 7.7 Wi n d o w s 22 7.8 Doors and Porches 24 7.10 The shops on the Upper Richmond Road 26 7.11 Putney Park House 27 7.12 North Lodge 27 8.0 Negative Elements 28 Management Strategy 29 9.0 Introduction 29 10.0 Enhancement 29 10.1 What you can do 30 10.2 Repair original features 30 10.4 Extensions 30 10.5 Parking in front gardens 30 10.6 Replacement windows 30 10.7 Changing roof tiles 31 10.8 Removing paint, stone cladding from brickwork 31 10.9 Grow and maintain a front garden hedge 31 10.10 Join the Dover House Estate Resident’s Association (DHERA) 31 10.11 What the council can do 31 11.0 Supplementary planning guidance - further reading 32 12.0 Planning Permission and Article 4 Direction 32 12.1 What is an Article 4 Direction? 32 12.2 What requires planning permission as a result of the Article 4 Direction? 33 12.3 Other planning controls as a result of Conservation Area Status? 33 13.0 Planning Applications - Council Policy 34 13.1 Application forms 34 13.2 Planning Applications - Council policy 34 13.3 How long does a planning application take? 35 13.4 Building Control 35 15.0 Contact list 36 Appendix 1 - How to grow a hedge 37 INTRODUCTION This document identifies and appraises the special architectural and historic characteristics of the Dover House Estate Conservation Area and it also gives practical guidance on the implications of Conservation Area status.
    [Show full text]
  • Knock It Down Or Do It Up? the Challenge of Estate Regeneration
    Housing Committee Knock it Down or Do it Up? The challenge of estate regeneration February 2015 Housing Committee Members Darren Johnson (Chair) Green Tom Copley (Deputy Chair) Labour Andrew Boff Conservative Nicky Gavron Labour Stephen Knight Liberal Democrat Steve O’Connell Conservative Murad Qureshi Labour Contact: Lorraine Ford Email: [email protected] Tel: 020 7983 4000 Media Contact: Ash Singleton Email: [email protected] Tel: 020 7983 5769 Cover photo: Green Man Lane Estate, Ealing Photo credit: Lorraine Ford ©Greater London Authority February 2015 2 Contents Foreword 4 Introduction 6 Principles and Recommendations 7 One: The Decision-Making Process 10 Two: Funding Dilemmas 24 Three: Active and Ongoing Communications 29 Appendix 1 Decision-Making Criteria and Models Used by Housing Providers 35 Appendix 2 Good Practice 39 Appendix 3 George Clarke’s Empty Homes Review Recommendations 44 Appendix 4 Circle Housing and Merton’s Pledge Commitments 46 Appendix 5 Conduct of the Investigation 48 Orders and Translations 49 3 Foreword In the past decade, few areas of housing policy have been as controversial as estate regeneration. Fifty estates with over 30,000 homes have undergone regeneration schemes in the past decade. While the total number of homes on those estates has now almost doubled, there has been a net loss of some 8,000 social rented homes. The costs and benefits of each individual scheme have been contested. One of the most divisive questions is whether to demolish or refurbish the existing homes. The trade-offs associated with demolishing council homes to build a greater quantity of more expensive homes are seen by some as realism, and others as social cleansing.
    [Show full text]