Dover House Estate Conservation Area Appraisal CONTENTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dover House Estate Conservation Area Appraisal CONTENTS 14 Dover House Estate Conservation Area Appraisal CONTENTS Introduction 3 Character Statement 5 1.0 Character analysis 5 2.0 Location and Context 6 3.0 History and Archaeology 6 4.0 Topography 13 5.0 Layout and Landscape 13 6.0 Green Elements and Public Realm 15 7.0 Building Design and materials 17 7.2 Roof types 18 7.4 Roofing materials 18 7.5 Wa l l s 22 7.7 Wi n d o w s 22 7.8 Doors and Porches 24 7.10 The shops on the Upper Richmond Road 26 7.11 Putney Park House 27 7.12 North Lodge 27 8.0 Negative Elements 28 Management Strategy 29 9.0 Introduction 29 10.0 Enhancement 29 10.1 What you can do 30 10.2 Repair original features 30 10.4 Extensions 30 10.5 Parking in front gardens 30 10.6 Replacement windows 30 10.7 Changing roof tiles 31 10.8 Removing paint, stone cladding from brickwork 31 10.9 Grow and maintain a front garden hedge 31 10.10 Join the Dover House Estate Resident’s Association (DHERA) 31 10.11 What the council can do 31 11.0 Supplementary planning guidance - further reading 32 12.0 Planning Permission and Article 4 Direction 32 12.1 What is an Article 4 Direction? 32 12.2 What requires planning permission as a result of the Article 4 Direction? 33 12.3 Other planning controls as a result of Conservation Area Status? 33 13.0 Planning Applications - Council Policy 34 13.1 Application forms 34 13.2 Planning Applications - Council policy 34 13.3 How long does a planning application take? 35 13.4 Building Control 35 15.0 Contact list 36 Appendix 1 - How to grow a hedge 37 INTRODUCTION This document identifies and appraises the special architectural and historic characteristics of the Dover House Estate Conservation Area and it also gives practical guidance on the implications of Conservation Area status. It is in two parts: a Character Statement and a Management Strategy. The Character Statement provides factual information regarding the Conservation Area, describing the features which give it its special character including the history, architecture and layout of the Estate. The Management Strategy gives specific planning guidance and enhancement proposals. Conservation areas were introduced by the Civic Amenities Act 1967 to safeguard areas of “special architectural or historic interest.” Dover House Estate Conservation Area was designated in 1978. In 1991 the Council sought to further protect the area’s appearance and special character through an Article 4 Direction. This Direction removes certain permitted development rights and means that many alterations relating to publicly visible elevations now require planning permission, (please see 13.2). This Appraisal has been produced in accordance with government guidelines set out in Planning Policy Guidance Note 15 (PPG15), and the English Heritage Guidance Notes of August 2005. These state that local planning authorities need to define and record the special interest, character and appearance of all conservation areas in their care. The intention of this Appraisal is to provide a clear analysis of the character and appearance of the Dover House Estate Conservation Area, which can assist in development control decisions, and which can help to support the Council’s decisions in the event of appeals. In addition, the Management Strategy addresses issues which have been identified in the character appraisal for the enhancement and preservation of the Conservation Area. The Appraisal has been through public consultation, amended accordingly and approved by the Corporate Resources Overview and Scrutiny Committee on 20th March 2007. It is important to note however that no appraisal can be completely comprehensive and the omission of a particular building, feature or open space should not be taken to imply that it is of no interest. 3 4 f D 1 7 8 8 Y TCB E R Roehampton CR 1 N 5 ' S 1 t o 2 e 4 L w Wick 0 3 6 A 8 8 8 C N 4 3 o 0 E t t a 1 t o g 8 1 e 4 1 8 7 8 TCB 8 6 8 2 1 8 3 9 9 TCB 3 9 7 9.2m 1 2 3 9 3 1 6 7 7 8 8 3 1 7 1 9.4m 6 2 5 8 3 0 D 2 1 A Y 7 7 3 9.5m 1 L North 0 9 5 E 3 7 5 3 0 1 S 2 6 4 1 LB 0 o 0 F t B 9 0 o 1 ro 3 Lodge C 1 O o 1 ns 0 t, 0 0 G 5 3 6 L R 2 3 A 1 s 0 ly 9 1 6 C 9 D 3 o 9 1 4 5 n 3 s t 7 & 9 2 7 L 9 8 5 B 3 9 B 3 A d 9 10.1m y 9 9 V M D S F E U A 9 W N N 4 3 2 N R O E U 1 G R P 3 D 4 E 7 I A R C R A K V G 7 C A E L 2 N 2 L O 1 A A S 1 V D E 1 E R 3 3 I 4 N 3 1 A U 3 E a UP F E P l 9 ER S 4 1 RIC 11.1m 3 Orchard u H 7 M b ON 1 D R S 1 House OAD t 1 9.1m a 4 3 0 1 U 1 El n d 8 70 66 7 1 1 Sub Sta PH 72 P Park 7 3 68 3 U The Cottage 4 T N 4 6 o 0 4 t 7 4 Studios 1 8 E 2 6 0 1 06 Y 4 1 76 6 P 8 c A 90 2 R K 8 3 7 A 82 TCB V The Briars E LB N 8 U 8 E 1 1 92 1 3 1 3 80 4 BALFOUR 1 8 to 24 4 1 2 1 Rosental 2 1 PLACE 2 7 5 2 2 5 8 1 1 1 1 4 2 8 1 to 9.2m 2 1 2 5 4 33 45 S eym 35 our 1 C 47 a ou 9 rt 2 Cheval Court 5 6 0 4 1 49 6 2 1 2 55 50 4 1 11.3m 3 3 o t 5 2 43 5 12.1m 38to48 2 B 1 1 M 1 2 9 o41 31t 1 1 . 16 9 0 a 18 m 36 2 24 2 3 BM 13.40m 9 4 0 9 3 5 4 3 2 6 o 2 8 t 3 3 1 2 5 o 1 t 13.3m 2 1 3 4 3 3 1 LB AVENUE 3 LANGSIDE e Newnes g d 0 o 8 4 1 L 3 3 t 13.4m e 3 s 3 4 4 r 5 4 7 2 e 2 M 13.95m Glenthorpe Path m B o o t S 9 1 3 J 3 1 o h 3 4 3 8 t o 5 n 7 Sussex Grove 1 9 G 4 3 2 t o 2 3 4 5 l 9 y n 3 6 t o 3 6 9 e s 8 C 5 D o 3 O u 8 o r t V M 3 t 1 a 1 E o 2 1 R t 0 2 5 0 5 5 3 1 4 6 H 5 4 7 1 5 2 t o O 5 1 5 8 U 4 0 4 1 S 1 t 3 E o 6 6 R 6 7 8 t LA o O El NT 4 6 5 E 0 A 6 1 R 3 N D Sub Sta CL 2 O 1 SE o t 7 7 1 1 1 R 1 O t o 0 1 E H 6 8 K 7 L A 1 A 6 2 M t o 5 65 W 14.2m 4 P 3 5 R 6 t o T 5 9 IA 6 O 2 7 R N o B t 1 L 1 A 18 N E 23 2 Church House The 4 Cottage 5 W 5 0 1 O 1 O ub Sta D 3 l S E B 1 12 O 1 a .7m 1 20 R 6 O E 6 U G L 50 5 2 L 5 E H 8 N 52 B R O O R D OA A O 28 IELD R U NGF D 6 TI 8 G HUN W 6 H 1 a r 8 d 36 1 C 5 B R d y P 6 4 9 PL U 1 3 A BM 15.55m T C 60 44 N E E 58 Y El 15.1m P 0 BM A 1 5 1 Sub R 2 K 15.94m 7 Sta L 5 A 0 6 7 1 D N 1 0 GFIELD ROA 2 UNTIN E H 8 1 15.9m 1 8 6 5 8 1 9 4 9 3 9 1 2 9 5 3 5 1 D 3 7 A 6 3 O 4 9 6 R 2 1 E 5 7 a T 1 0 O 1 C M A 6 R Post 1 B 5 El BM Sub 2 Sta 16.62m 1 N CLOSE ROEHAMPTO 8 d 4 n o LB P El Sub Sta 22 The Lodge Allotment Gardens 1 6 7 1 7 1 0 8 7 3 2 Posts 1 to 6 4 2 1 2 1 1 7 9 4 Post 14.3m to 4 1 4 1 24 4 8 6 B 1 17.1m M 6 1 1 2 17.3m 4 3 8 7 .9 8 2 6 2 t 1 8 o m 1 N 2 o r t h 0 3 3 L 17.3m R 4 o O o Posts d t 2 g E 1 8 3 e H 3 8 A D 8 A 3 O M 3 E R ORP P 4 TH 3 D T OO 1 W O 13.0m 5 N D 1 A C O L R O S E E N R 0 2 U B N I 1 4 W E 4 C t S o 1 N A 1 6 S 9 5 1 9 A 1 2 E L 13.7m o t 2 P 7 8 3 1 o t 8 E 6 2 16 9 3 H F T BM 9 1 a 3 7 i LB r 13.58m a c 9 LK 3 2 IBBON WA r 7 G 18.5m e 2 0 s t o 0 2 2 7 5 1 9.22m BM 1 1 1 7 3 6 o t 4 6 2 3 1 8 3 2 9 o t 6 NCE 2 SA THE PLEA ELIOT GARDENS 9 18.6m 9 2 9 1 5 7 1 8 9 0 6 1 1 5 4 2 3 2 2 1 D 8 2 6 O 14.5m V E R 48 H 9 O 5 U 58 S 1 E 18.8m AU El Sub Sta BYN R 44 1 O 4 S Q A 7 16.9m o 4 D 4 t 5 U 2 A 1 4 R 3 E 57 E ROAD WINBURN ll House S 2 43 45 46 Cromwe 4 to 20 1 2 3 55 56 BM 20.27m 48 to 5 8 72 Play Area 2 8 1 1 2 3 7 1 0 0 1 2 St Margaret's 1 6 1 1 1 1 4 6 1 0 1 20.2m 6 n lysta LK 8 E NS WA o t Court LYSO 5 4 St Margaret's Court 3 2 1 1 1 o 8 2 t 0 6 9 8 D 5 B 1 5 9 2 M N 4 o B i w o c E 2 t o N n 3 A h L 0 E n C S 3 N ' 2 A 1 o i D AS 2 E 3 .
Recommended publications
  • DOM Magazine No
    2020 DOM magazine 04 December The Art of Books and Buildings The Cities of Tomorrow Streets were suddenly empty, and people began to flee to the countryside. The corona virus pandemic has forced us to re- think urban design, which is at the heart of this issue. From the hotly debated subject of density to London’s innovative social housing through to Berlin’s creative spaces: what will the cities of the future look like? See pages 14 to 27 PORTRAIT The setting was as elegant as one would expect from a dig- Jean-Philippe Hugron, nified French institution. In late September, the Académie Architecture Critic d’Architecture – founded in 1841, though its roots go back to pre- revolutionary France – presented its awards for this year. The Frenchman has loved buildings since The ceremony took place in the institution’s rooms next to the childhood – the taller, the better. Which Place des Vosges, the oldest of the five ‘royal squares’ of Paris, is why he lives in Paris’s skyscraper dis- situated in the heart of the French capital. The award winners trict and is intrigued by Monaco. Now he included DOM publishers-author Jean-Philippe Hugron, who has received an award from the Académie was honoured for his publications. The 38-year-old critic writes d’Architecture for his writing. for prestigious French magazines such as Architecture d’au jourd’hui and Exé as well as the German Baumeister. Text: Björn Rosen Hugron lives ten kilometres west of the Place des Vosges – and architecturally in a completely different world.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak Sub Region
    Peak Sub Region Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment Final Report to Derbyshire Dales District Council, High Peak Borough Council and the Peak District National Park Authority June 2009 ekosgen Lawrence Buildings 2 Mount Street Manchester M2 5WQ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 5 STUDY INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 5 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY AREA ............................................................................................... 5 ROLE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................ 8 REPORT STRUCTURE.............................................................................................................. 10 2 SHLAA GUIDANCE AND STUDY METHODOLOGY..................................................... 12 SHLAA GUIDANCE................................................................................................................. 12 STUDY METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................... 13 3 POLICY CONTEXT.......................................................................................................... 18 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 18 NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND
    [Show full text]
  • The London List
    The London List YEARBOOK 2010 FOREWORD 4 GAZETTEER 5 Commemorative Structures 6 Commercial Buildings 12 Cultural and Entertainment 18 Domestic 22 Education 32 Garden and Park 36 Health and Welfare 38 Industrial 44 Law and Government 46 Maritime and Naval 48 Military 50 Places of Worship 54 Street Furniture 62 Transport Buildings 65 Utilities and Communications 66 INDEX 68 TheListed London in London: List: yearbookyearbook 20102010 22 Contents Foreword ....................................................................................4 Gazetteer ...................................................................................5 Commemorative Structures .......................................................6 Commercial Buildings ..................................................................12 Cultural and Entertainment .....................................................18 Domestic ............................................................................................22 Education ............................................................................................32 Garden and Park ............................................................................36 Health and Welfare ......................................................................38 Industrial ..............................................................................................44 Law and Government .................................................................46 Maritime and Naval ......................................................................48
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Contemporary Archaeologies of Social Housing: Changing Experiences of the Modern and New, 1870 to Present
    Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Emma Dwyer School of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester 2014 Thesis abstract: Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Emma Dwyer This thesis has used building recording techniques, documentary research and oral history testimonies to explore how concepts of the modern and new between the 1870s and 1930s shaped the urban built environment, through the study of a particular kind of infrastructure that was developed to meet the needs of expanding cities at this time – social (or municipal) housing – and how social housing was perceived and experienced as a new kind of built environment, by planners, architects, local government and residents. This thesis also addressed how the concepts and priorities of the Victorian and Edwardian periods, and the decisions made by those in authority regarding the form of social housing, continue to shape the urban built environment and impact on the lived experience of social housing today. In order to address this, two research questions were devised: How can changing attitudes and responses to the nature of modern life between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries be seen in the built environment, specifically in the form and use of social housing? Can contradictions between these earlier notions of the modern and new, and our own be seen in the responses of official authority and residents to the built environment? The research questions were applied to three case study areas, three housing estates constructed between 1910 and 1932 in Birmingham, London and Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Official WANDSWORTH BOROUGH COUNCIL BUILDINGS OF SPECIAL ARCHITECTURAL OR HISTORIC INTEREST INTRODUCTION The Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport is required to compile lists of buildings of special architectural or historic interest for the guidance of local planning authorities. Conservation policies are often based on the lists, which are being revised within nationally applied surveys of specific building types. How Buildings are Chosen The principles of selection for these lists were originally drawn up by an expert committee of architects, antiquarians and historians, and are still followed, although now adapted to thematic surveys and Post-War buildings. Buildings that qualify for listing are:- (a) All buildings before 1700 which survive in anything like their original condition. (b) Most buildings between 1700-1840, though some selection is necessary. (c) Between 1840 and 1914 only buildings of definite quality and character, the selection being designed to include the best examples of particular building types. (d) Selected buildings from the period after 1914 are selected on the same basis. (e) Buildings under 30 years old (but more than ten) are normally listed only if they are of outstanding quality and under threat. In choosing buildings, particular attention is paid to:- � Special value within certain types, either for architectural or planning reasons or as illustrating social and economic history (for instance, industrial buildings, railway stations, schools, hospitals, prisons, theatres). � Technological innovation or virtuosity (for instance cast iron, prefabrication, or the early use of concrete). � Group value, especially as examples of town planning (for instance, squares, terraces or model estates). � Association with well-known characters or events.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hattersley and Mottram Housing Estate: an Evaluation of Its Regeneration
    Heseltine Institute for Public Policy, Practice and Place The Hattersley and Mottram housing estate: An evaluation of its regeneration Report summary Produced for Onward Homes by Dr Paul Hepburn and Dr Matthew Thompson, University of Liverpool May 2018 REPORT HEADLINES | 3 REPORT HEADLINES In October 2017, the Heseltine Institute was commissioned by Onward Homes to evaluate the impact of interventions made by Peak Valley Housing Association (PVHA) in the regeneration of Hattersley and Mottram, a large former council housing estate in Greater Manchester. This evaluation is a snapshot of an ongoing process of regeneration, which has a further 10 years to run, that aims to provide lessons for Onward, the wider housing sector, policy makers in local and central government. Our evaluation found that the regeneration interventions have been There are many lessons for future regeneration projects such as this. largely successful and significant progress has been made in meeting Referred to frequently by interviewees as a singular ‘act of genius’, the original objectives of the ‘Collaboration Agreement’, the founding the Collaboration Agreement has been the cornerstone of the legal document for the regeneration partnership. The quality of regeneration programme, leveraging in private sector investment to housing stock has been considerably improved – both the upgrading pay for transformations to the estate’s housing, retail, community and of existing stock and the construction of new housing. There is now a transport infrastructures while retaining public control of the land and greater mix of tenures with an unprecedented increase in new-build regeneration process. Much too can be learnt from the ‘relational’ owner occupation, and all housing stock now meets the Decent Homes as opposed to ‘transactional’ approach of PVHA which has been Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Council Housing For?
    ‘We thought it was Buckingham Palace’ ‘Homes for Heroes’ Cottage Estates Dover House Estate, Putney, LCC (1919) Cottage Estates Alfred and Ada Salter Wilson Grove Estate, Bermondsey Metropolitan Borough Council (1924) Tenements White City Estate, LCC (1938) Mixed Development Somerford Grove, Hackney Metropolitan Borough Council (1949) Neighbourhood Units The Lansbury Estate, Poplar, LCC (1951) Post-War Flats Spa Green Estate, Finsbury Metropolitan Borough Council (1949) Berthold Lubetkin Post-War Flats Churchill Gardens Estate, City of Westminster (1951) Architectural Wars Alton East, Roehampton, LCC (1951) Alton West, Roehampton, LCC (1953) Multi-Storey Housing Dawson’s Heights, Southwark Borough Council (1972) Kate Macintosh The Small Estate Chinbrook Estate, Lewisham, LCC (1965) Low-Rise, High Density Lambeth Borough Council Central Hill (1974) Cressingham Gardens (1978) Camden Borough Council Low-Rise, High Density Branch Hill Estate (1978) Alexandra Road Estate (1979) Whittington Estate (1981) Goldsmith Street, Norwich City Council (2018) Passivhaus Mixed Communities ‘The key to successful communities is a good mix of people: tenants, leaseholders and freeholders. The Pepys Estate was a monolithic concentration of public housing and it makes sense to break that up a bit and bring in a different mix of incomes and people with spending power.’ Pat Hayes, LB Lewisham, Director of Regeneration You have castrated communities. You have colonies of low income people, living in houses provided by the local authorities, and you have the higher income groups living in their own colonies. This segregation of the different income groups is a wholly evil thing, from a civilised point of view… We should try to introduce what was always the lovely feature of English and Welsh villages, where the doctor, the grocer, the butcher and the farm labourer all lived in the same street – the living tapestry of a mixed community.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks Open Spaces Timeline
    Wandsworth Council Parks time line There are many large green open places in south west London. The commons of Barnes, Battersea, Clapham, Putney, Streatham, Tooting, Wandsworth and Wimbledon date from ‘time immemorial’. Though largely comprising the wastes or heathland of a parish, the commons were integral to mediaeval land settlements and were owned by lords of the manors. As London developed during the nineteenth century the land was increasingly developed for housing. Several legal battles took place to defend the commons as open land. Garratt Green had long been ‘defended’ by the infamous Mayors of Garratt elections. Listed below are the green places in the Borough of Wandsworth that are managed by Wandsworth Parks Service. Further historic information can be found in the individual site management plans. 1858 A Royal Commission into housing recommended creating Battersea Park, Kennington Park, and Victoria Park in Hackney with formal and informal gardens as a way offering moral improvement to an area. Health was a matter of fresh air, exercise and diet, rather than one of medical resources. 1885 Battersea Vestry created Christchurch Gardens as ‘an outdoor drawing room’. The shelter and memorial were added after 1945. 1886 Waterman’s Green was created by the Metropolitan Board of Works as part of the approach to the new Putney Bridge when it was rebuilt in stone. It was not publicly accessible. 1888 Battersea Vestry owned the parish wharf and created Vicarage Gardens as a promenade, complete with ornamental urns on plinths along the river wall. During 1990s it was included in flood defence schemes. 1903 Leader’s Gardens and Coronation Gardens were created as public parks by private donation from two wealthy local individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2016 • Issue 35
    May 2016 • Issue 35 A newsletter by residents for residents Have your say Use your vote to award £100,000! Festival Odyssey 70s legends to headline Phoenix Festival community news Focus on… Rent and service charges Welcome… Looking for our contact details? Turn to the back page! Welcome to Community News This May edition of Community News is jam-packed with updates and competitions for you. Summer is almost here and we’re getting ready for the Phoenix Festival on Saturday 14 May at Forster Park. Lots of popular activities will be returning as well as some new and exciting events. These include a Community Parade which will pass through Downham before kicking off the festival! Why not bring your dog to take part in our new dog show too? At the festival you will also be able to meet the larger projects which have been shortlisted for Community Chest funding. Smaller projects have already been selected by our panel – turn to pages 10 and 11 to find out who was successful. The projects will benefit our whole community and everyone can get involved. Downham is celebrating its 90th birthday this year and there’s more information on Page 10 and 11 about how you can get involved in the celebrations. We also hear from Eileen Hale, a resident who has lived in the same home for 88 years. Her WIN! ‘Spot yourself!’ memories of the area really showed us how much has changed If this is you, pictured at our over the years. Read her story on Page 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hattersley and Mottram Housing Estate: an Evaluation of Its Regeneration
    Heseltine Institute for Public Policy, Practice and Place The Hattersley and Mottram housing estate: An evaluation of its regeneration Produced for Onward Homes by Dr Paul Hepburn and Dr Matthew Thompson, University of Liverpool May 2018 2 | THE HATTERSLEY AND MOTTRAM HOUSING ESTATE: AN EVALUATION OF ITS REGENERATION CONTENTS | 3 Contents List of figures Report headlines ........................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Figure 1 Aerial view over the Hattersley estate, looking west towards Manchester city centre ..................................................................................... 15 Report summary .........................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Figure 2 Map showing Hattersley’s location ....................................................................................................................................................................................17 The Collaboration Agreement .................................................................................................................................................................................8 Figure 3 The original outline plan for the Hattersley overspill estate .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Council Budget 2019/20
    COUNCIL BUDGETS 2019-2020 WANDSWORTH BOROUGH COUNCIL – BUDGET BOOK 2019/20 CONTENTS PAGES Council Tax Report and technical appendices 3-31 Revenue Budget by Service 32-71 Capital Programme 72-99 Treasury Management 100-121 Housing Budgets 122-163 Pension Fund 164-167 SECTION 1 COUNCIL’S REVENUE BUDGET AND COUNCIL TAX This section sets out how the 2019/20 revenue budget, council tax, and budget framework were developed from the previous year’s budget. It is based on reports considered by the Finance and Corporate Resources Overview and Scrutiny Committee on the 16th January 2019 and 13th February 2019, and by the Council on the 25th February 2019.The section contains appendices summarising the budgetary effect of developments and of repricing from November 2017 to 2018, levies from other public bodies, special reserves, and the council tax base. - 1 - - 2 - PAPER NO: 19-82 WANDSWORTH BOROUGH COUNCIL FINANCE AND CORPORATE RESOURCES OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE – 13TH FEBRUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE – 25TH FEBRUARY 2019 Report by the Director of Resources on the Council Tax Requirement and Council Tax for 2019/20 SUMMARY The Cabinet Member’s recommendation indicates a Council Tax Requirement and total tax amounts for 2019/20 as shown in bold below. The recommended budget framework (Appendix F) then implies the average Band D tax amounts increasing as shown in italics below. These sums are before any further reductions in expenditure or use of balances and reserves. 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 £m £m £m £m Council Tax Requirement 55.987 59.921
    [Show full text]
  • 6 5 2 1 3 7 9 8Q Y T U R E W I O G J H K F D S
    i s 8 7q a 3 CITY 5 e TOWER HAMLETS k p 4 1 u rf 6w y 2 9 g j t do h RADICAL HOUSING LOCATIONS Virtual Radical Housing Tour for Open House Hope you enjoyed the virtual tour. Here’s a list of the sites we visited on the tour with some hopefully useful info. Please see the map on the website https://www.londonsights.org.uk/ and https://www.morehousing.co.uk/ ENJOY… No Site Year Address Borough Built VICTORIAN PHILANTHROPISTS Prince Albert’s Model Cottage 1851 Prince Consort Lodge, Lambeth Built for the Great Exhibition 1851 and moved here. Prince Albert = President of Society for Kennington Park, Improving the Condition of the Labouring Classes. Prototype for social housing schemes. Kennington Park Place, 4 self-contained flats with inside WCs. Now HQ for Trees for Cities charity. London SE11 4AS Lambeth’s former workhouse – now the Cinema Museum 1880s The Cinema Museum Lambeth Charlie Chaplin sent here 1896 with mother and brother. Masters Lodge. 2 Dugard Way, Prince's, See website for opening times http://www.cinemamuseum.org.uk/ London SE11 4TH Parnell House 1850 Streatham Street Camden Earliest example of social housing in London. Same architect (Henry Roberts) as Model Cottage in Fitzrovia, London stop 1. Now owned by Peabody housing association (HA). Grade 2 listed. WC1A 1JB George Peabody statue Royal Exchange Avenue, City of London George Peabody - an American financier & philanthropist. Founded Peabody Trust HA with a Cornhill, charitable donation of £500k. London EC3V 3NL First flats built by Peabody HA 1863 Commercial Street Tower Now in private ownership London E1 Hamlets Peabody’s Blackfriars Road estate 1871 Blackfriars Road Southwark More typical ‘Peabody’ design.
    [Show full text]