DOCSLIB.ORG

7 Burial Descriptions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
7 Burial Descriptions King You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. A Dan Josselyn Memorial Publication You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. King The Social Archaeology of a Late Mississippian Town in Northwestern Georgia DAVID J. HALLY THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA PRESS Tuscaloosa You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. Copyright © 2008 The University of Alabama Press Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0380 All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Typeface: Minion ∞ The paper on which this book is printed meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences- Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Hally, David J. King : the social archaeology of a late Mississippian town in northwestern Georgia / David J. Hally. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8173-1604-4 (cloth : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-0-8173-5460-2 (paper : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-0-8173-8121-9 (electronic) 1. King Site (Ga.) 2. Indians of North America— Georgia— Antiquities. 3. Social archaeology— Georgia. 4. Excavations (Arch aeology)—Georgia. 5. Mississippian culture—Georgia. 6. Indians of North America— Georgia— Social conditions—16th century. 7. Social status—Georgia— History—16th century. 8. Households— Georgia— History—16th century. 9. Community life— Georgia— History—16th century. 10. Spaniards— Georgia—History—16th century. I. Title. E78.G3H353 2008 975.8′35—dc22 2007050784 You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. For Carolyn You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. Contents List of Illustrations ix Preface xix Acknowledgments xxiii 1. Introduction 1 2. The Nature of Mississippian Society 8 3. The Natural, Cultural, and Historical Context of the King Site 22 4. Site Excavations 40 5. Domestic Architecture 50 6. Public Architecture 121 7. Burial Descriptions 184 8. Household and Community 271 9. Analysis of Burial Attribute Associations 331 10. Artifact Co- occurrences 372 11. Artifact Co- occurrences among Adult Males 412 12. Community and Polity in Northwestern Georgia 497 References Cited 545 Index 575 You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. viii / Contents CONTENTS OF ACCOMPANYING COMPACT DISC Appendix A. Description of Primary Domestic Structures Appendix B. Description of Rectangular Structures Appendix C. Burial Data Appendix D. Stratigraphic Characteristics of Disturbed, Intrusive, and Multiple Burials Appendix E. Age and Sex Identifi cation of Burials Appendix F. Burial Assignment of Grave Goods in Multiple and Intrusive Burials Appendix G. Location of Burials Appendix H. Location of Postholes and Features You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. Illustrations Figures 1.1. Major architectural features and human burials recorded at the King site 2 3.1. Location of the King site 23 3.2. Mississippian sites recorded in Foster Bend 24 3.3. Contour map of Foster Bend showing the ridge- and- swale topography 25 3.4. View looking east across the Foster Bend fl oodplain 26 3.5. Physiographic features of the Valley and Ridge Province in northwestern Georgia 28 3.6. Selected Mississippian sites in the Southern Appalachian region 31 3.7. Location of towns making up the Rome polity 36 3.8. Mid- sixteenth- century polities in the Valley and Ridge Province of northeastern Alabama, northwestern Georgia, and southeastern Tennessee 38 4.1. Map of King site excavations showing postholes, features, burials, and contours of the sub–plow zone ground surface 42 You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. x / Illustrations 5.1. Location of primary domestic structures 51 5.2. Plan view of Structure 7 52 5.3. Artist’s reconstruction of typical primary domestic structure 52 5.4. Structure 4 viewed from the west 53 5.5. Size distribution of primary domestic structures 82 5.6. Estimated number of exterior wall posts in individual primary domestic structures 85 5.7. Plan view of Structure 4, showing partition wall remnants and the distribution of piece- plotted lithic artifacts on the fl oor of Structure 4 90 5.8. Distribution of piece- plotted pottery on the fl oor of Structure 4 102 5.9. Distribution of piece- plotted animal bone and shell on the fl oor of Structure 4 103 5.10. Architectural confi guration of RS 1 107 5.11. Location of rectangular structures 109 6.1. Site plan showing plaza structures and features and defensive perimeter 122 6.2. Density of postholes in the plaza and habitation zone 124 6.3. Posthole patterns for Structures 16 and 17 126 6.4. Reconstructed architectural characteristics of Structures 16 and 17 127 6.5. Postholes in the plaza north of Structures 16 and 17 149 6.6. Architectural confi guration of possible pavilion 150 6.7. Feature 45 plan views and profi les 153 6.8. Feature 11 plan view and profi le 160 6.9. Feature 64 plan view and profi les 162 6.10. Southeastern segment of palisade and ditch 168 6.11. Northeastern segment of palisade and ditch 168 6.12. East- central segment of palisade and ditch 169 6.13. Southern segment of palisade and ditch 173 6.14. Defensive ditch profi les 176 You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. Illustrations / xi 7.1. Burial 80 (extended) intrusive into Burials 110 (fl exed) and 111 (partially fl exed with tightly fl exed knees) 194 7.2. Flexed Burial 92 intrusive through Burial 93 195 7.3. Intrusive fl exed Burials 135 and 136 196 7.4. Bundle Burial 131 with fl exed Burials 143 and 144 206 7.5. Bundle Burial 260 with partially fl exed Burial 117 207 7.6. Bundle Burial 166 208 7.7. Extended Burials 23 and 24 209 7.8. Burial 54 (fl exed on back) 210 7.9. Burial 67 (fl exed on side) 210 7.10. Burial 60 (partially fl exed on back) 211 7.11. Burial 59 (tightly fl exed on back) 212 7.12. Iron tools from burials 223 7.13. Copper arrow symbol badges from Burial 92 224 7.14. Large bifacial blades from burials 226 7.15. Asymmetrical blade from Burial 49 229 7.16. Points from burials representing different microstyles 232 7.17. Points from Burial 65 representing three microstyles 233 7.18. Stone celts from burials 234 7.19. Spatulate celt and possible spatulate celt from burials 236 7.20. Stone discoidals from burials 237 7.21. Flintknapping tools from burials 239 7.22. Gravy boat bowl from Burial 92 249 7.23. Clay and stone pipes from burials 250 7.24. Bone tools from burials 253 7.25. Rattlesnake gorgets from burials 263 7.26. Knobbed shell pins from burials 264 8.1. Rectangular open spaces adjacent to primary domestic structures 274 You are reading copyrighted material published by the University of Alabama Press. Any posting, copying, or distributing of this work beyond fair use as defined under U.S. Copyright law is illegal and injures the author and publisher. For permission to reuse this work, contact the University of Alabama Press. xii / Illustrations 8.2. Entrance passages and possible locations of entrance passages for primary domestic structures 275 8.3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • SEAC Bulletin 58.Pdf
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 18-21, 2015 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE BULLETIN 58 SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE BULLETIN 58 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 18-21, 2015 DOUBLETREE BY HILTON DOWNTOWN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE Organized by: Kevin E. Smith, Aaron Deter-Wolf, Phillip Hodge, Shannon Hodge, Sarah Levithol, Michael C. Moore, and Tanya M. Peres Hosted by: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Middle Tennessee State University Division of Archaeology, Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Office of Social and Cultural Resources, Tennessee Department of Transportation iii Cover: Sellars Mississippian Ancestral Pair. Left: McClung Museum of Natural History and Culture; Right: John C. Waggoner, Jr. Photographs by David H. Dye Printing of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 58 – 2015 Funded by Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Authorization No. 327420, 750 copies. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $4.08 per copy. October 2015. Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s Policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in its programs, services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, EEO/AA Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 2nd floor, William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-888-867-7455. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the ADA Coordinator, Human Resources Division, 312 Rosa L.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2013 Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina Gabrielle Casio Purcell [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Purcell, Gabrielle Casio, "Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2447 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Gabrielle Casio Purcell entitled "Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Kandace D. Hollenbach, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald Schroedl, Michael Logan Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) i Plant Remains from the Smokemont Site in the Appalachian Mountains of North Carolina A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Gabrielle Casio Purcell August 2013 ii Copyright © 2013 by Gabrielle Casio Purcell All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Mouths of Mississippian: Determining Biological Affinity Between the Oliver Site (22-Co-503) and the Hollywood Site (22-Tu-500)
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2014 From The Mouths Of Mississippian: Determining Biological Affinity Between The Oliver Site (22-Co-503) And The Hollywood Site (22-Tu-500) Hanna Stewart University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Stewart, Hanna, "From The Mouths Of Mississippian: Determining Biological Affinity Between The Oliver Site (22-Co-503) And The Hollywood Site (22-Tu-500)" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 357. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/357 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM THE MOUTHS OF MISSISSIPPIAN: DETERMINING BIOLOGICAL AFFINITY BETWEEN THE OLIVER SITE (22-Co-503) AND THE HOLLYWOOD SITE (22-Tu-500) A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology The University of Mississippi Hanna Stewart B.A. University of Arizona May 2014 Copyright Hanna Stewart 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT The Mississippian period in the American Southeast was a period of immense interaction between polities as a result of vast trade networks, regional mating networks which included spousal exchange, chiefdom collapse, and endemic warfare. This constant interaction is reflected not only in the cultural materials but also in the genetic composition of the inhabitants of this area. Despite constant interaction, cultural restrictions prevented polities from intermixing and coalescent groups under the same polity formed subgroups grounded in their own identity as a result unique histories (Harle 2010; Milner 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • 800.438.1601
    Cherokee Welcome Center VisitCherokeeNC.com 800.438.1601 Oconaluftee Indian Village, “ Unto These Hills” Outdoor Drama VisitCherokeeNC.com 866.554.4557 Fisheries & Wildlife Management FishCherokee.com 828.554.6110 Museum of the Cherokee Indian CherokeeMuseum.org 828.497.3481 Sequoyah National Golf Club SequoyahNational.com 828.497.3000 Qualla Arts and Crafts Mutual, Inc. QuallaArtsAndCrafts.com 828.497.3103 VisitCherokeeNC.com | 800.438.1601 This is what Chapter II: Strangers I was told In 1540, Spanish explorer and conquistador Hernando de perception of the region. Peace made Soto came through here looking for gold, demanding food, alliances irrelevant and mounting when I was young. fighting, enslaving—despite what you may have heard, he pressure from land speculators made wasn’t a great guy. Worse were the diseases that came with the Cherokees an inconvenience. Cherokees begin a story the way their people have him. Lacking the immunity to combat these afflictions, In 1830 Andrew Jackson signed the for generations. It’s only fitting to start the story of indigenous peoples were nearly eradicated, victim to Indian Removal Act offering the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians the same way. plagues such as smallpox, measles, and influenza. territory out west in exchange for Chapter I: A Long Time Ago Nevertheless, the Cherokees continued their homeland. Five years later came the to work through diplomacy with the Treaty of New Echota, which ceded to the The Cherokees were hunters and gatherers, foraging newcomers for the next 200 years. federal government most of the Cherokee lands the Great Smoky Mountains and the lowlands east of the Mississippi, resulting in what is now By the late eighteenth century, seventy-five percent of the Southern Appalachians for food while referred to as the “Trail of Tears.” of Cherokee land had been lost through treaties with hunting, fishing, and trapping game.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Sense of Communityamong the Capital City Cherokees
    CREATING A SENSE OF COMMUNITYAMONG THE CAPITAL CITY CHEROKEES by Pamela Parks Tinker A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Interdisciplinary Studies Committee: ____________________________________ Director ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Program Director ____________________________________ Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date:________________________________ Spring 2016 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Creating a Sense Of Community Among Capital City Cherokees A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Interdisciplinary Studies at George Mason University By Pamela Parks Tinker Bachelor of Science Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University 1975 Director: Meredith H. Lair, Professor Department of History Spring Semester 2016 George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Copyright 2016 Pamela Parks Tinker All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements Thanks to the Capital City Cherokee Community for allowing me to study the formation of the community and for making time for personal interviews. I am grateful for the guidance offered by my Thesis Committee of three professors. Thesis Committee Chair, Professor Maria Dakake, also served as my advisor over a period of years in planning a course of study that truly has been interdisciplinary. It has been a joyful situation to be admitted to a variety of history, religion and spirituality, folklore, ethnographic writing, and research courses under the umbrella of one Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies program. Much of the inspiration for this thesis occurred at George Mason University in Professor Debra Lattanzi Shutika’s Folklore class on “Sense of Place” in which the world of Ethnography opened up for me.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • White-Tailed Deer a Sacred Animal
    Cherokee A Wi Cherokee Importance The Deer Clan is one of the 7 Cherokee Clans making the White-tailed Deer a sacred animal. Cherokees from this clan were the keepers , hunters, and trackers of the deer, as well as keepers of the deer medicine. Deer Clan members were swift runners and therefore, messengers. White-tailed Deer have been a staple food source for the Cherokees probably as long as the Cherokees have existed. In addition to being a major food source, deer were used as a resource to manufacture clothing and utility items, as well as being a major source of early trade and commerce. Deer antlers were also used to knap flint into arrowheads, spearheads, knives, etc. before the introduction of steel and other metals. Some of the heavier bones, such as the femur (upper leg bone), could have also been used as tools and weapons. The Cherokee story of the Spirit of Little Deer goes as follows: Little Deer was the protector of the deer. Cherokee hunters were knowledgeable in the ways of hunting the deer and prayed to the Deer Spirit out of reverence when deer were killed for food. If a hunter killed a deer needlessly and without asking the Deer Spirit’s pardon, Little Deer would track down the hunter and give him rheumatism so that he could hunt no more. Today, White-tailed Deer are still the most sought-after big game animal in the United States. Description White-tailed deer are among the smallest members of the deer family in the United States, with the largest being the moose, then elk.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites and Skeletal Indicators of Anemia in the Eastern United States
    Parasites and skeletal indicators of anemia in the eastern United States Item Type Thesis Authors Dinneen, Erin Download date 06/10/2021 02:28:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4801 ii PARASITES AND SKELETAL INDICATORS OF ANEMIA IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Erin E. Dinneen, B.S. Fairbanks, Alaska Title Page December 2014 iii Abstract The goal of this research is to examine the influence of parasitic infection and diet in the etiology of anemia in prehistoric human populations of the eastern United States. Prehistorically, anemia is often attributed to a nutrient-deficient diet, while parasite infection is discussed as a secondary cause if at all. However, parasite infection is a leading cause of anemia in the developing world today. Modern epidemiological studies have demonstrated that parasites thrive or perish under particular environmental conditions, and risk for parasite infection can be predicted based on environment using GIS. Here I apply this method to see whether environmental conditions, acting as a proxy for parasite infection risk, can predict prehistoric skeletal lesion rates for porotic hyperostosis and cribra orbitalia, lesions thought to reflect acquired anemia. Rates of porotic hyperostosis and cribra orbitalia in the skeletal remains of children and adults were collected from published data for 22 sites in the eastern United States. GIS was used to gather comparable environmental data. Soil drainage, elevation, precipitation, temperature and the surface area of bodies of water were recorded within a 15 km radius of each site.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial and Elemental Analyses of the Ceramic Assemblage at Mialoquo (40Mr3), an Overhill Cherokee Town in Monroe County, Tennessee
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2019 COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE Christian Allen University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Allen, Christian, "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2019. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5572 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Christian Allen entitled "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Kandace Hollenbach, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald Schroedl, Julie Reed Accepted for the Council: Dixie L.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Plants Used for Medicinal Purposes by the Creek and Seminoles Tribes
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 3-24-2010 A Comparative Study of the Plants Used for Medicinal Purposes by the Creek and Seminoles Tribes Kimberly Hutton University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hutton, Kimberly, "A Comparative Study of the Plants Used for Medicinal Purposes by the Creek and Seminoles Tribes" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1665 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Comparative Study of the Plants Used for Medicinal Purposes by the Creek and Seminoles Tribes by Kimberly Hutton A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Cell Biology, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology College of Arts and Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Richard P.Wunderlin, Ph.D. Frederick Essig, Ph.D Brent Weisman, Ph.D Date of Approval: March 24, 2010 Keywords: ethnobotany, native, treatments, illness, Florida © Copyright 2010, Kimberly Hutton ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my major professor and advisor, Dr. Richard Wunderlin, for his support, guidance, knowledge and patience throughout this project. I would also like to thank Sarah Sanford for her editorial guidance. Thanks go to my friend and cheerleader, Laurie Walker, who kept me going with her encouragement and unwaivering support.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRAVELING TOTEM POLE GRDS 724: GRAPHIC DESIGN STUDIO: MEDIA PRACTICE Devin O’Bryan / Spring 2013 TABLE of CONTENTS “We Do Not Inherit the Land from 1
    HISTORY PRESERVATION: THE TRAVELING TOTEM POLE GRDS 724: GRAPHIC DESIGN STUDIO: MEDIA PRACTICE Devin O’Bryan / Spring 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS “We do not inherit the land from 1. Cover our ancestors, we borrow it from 2. Table of Contents our children.” 3. Introduction 4. The Seven Cherokee Clans 5. Cherokee Cultural Heritage Preservation - Old Cherokee Proverb 6. Mood Experience 10. Target Audience & Geographic Scope 11. Bibliography & Resources 12. Communication Strategy 13. Ideation 14. 3D Model Comps 15. 3D Model Blocking 17. Cherokee Totem Pieces 24. Totem Pole 28. Final Renders 33. Brochure Card 34. Brochure Card in Context INTRODUCTION The Cherokee are a Native American people that historically settled in the Southeastern United States (principally Georgia, North Carolina, and East Tennessee). Their language is an Iroquoian language. In the 19th century, white settlers in the United States called the Cherokee one of the “Five Civilized Tribes”, because they had assimilated numerous cultural and technological practices of European American settlers. The Cherokee were one of the first, if not the first, major non-European ethnic group to become U.S. citizens. According to the 2010 U.S. Census, the Cherokee Nation has more than 314,000 members –the Cherokee language is classified as ‘vulnerable’ according to Google’s Endangered Languages Project due to that there are only an estimated 16,000 speakers – the largest of the 566 federally recognized Native American tribes in the United States of America Of the three federally recognized Cherokee tribes, the Cherokee Nation and the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians (UKB) have headquarters in Tahlequah, Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]