DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyright by Sarah Ellen Vartabedian 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copyright by Sarah Ellen Vartabedian 2012 Copyright by Sarah Ellen Vartabedian 2012 THE DISSERTATION COMMITTEE FOR SARAH ELLEN VARTABEDIAN CERTIFIES THAT THIS IS THE APPROVED VERSION OF THE FOLLOWING DISSERTATION: WORKING THROUGH A MONUMENTAL BREAK UP: IDEOLOGICAL TRANSITIONS, IRONIC MONUMENTAL DISRUPTIONS, AND PUBLIC DELIBERATION Committee: Dana Cloud, Supervisor Carole Blair Paul Bolin Barry Brummett Sharon Jarvis Working through a Monumental Break Up: Ideological Transitions, Ironic Monumental Disruptions and Public Deliberation by SARAH ELLEN VARTABEDIAN, B.A.; M.A. DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN DECEMBER, 2012 Acknowledgements So many people contributed to this dissertation in significant ways. I will not do them justice in the next few pages, but please know that I will forever be grateful to you all. First, I want to thank my advisor Dana Cloud. Her feedback and encouragement throughout this process made me a better writer and scholar and I will always be in awe of her editing skills. Thank you for always finding the kindest way to say “your passive voice is slowly killing me.” Thank you for being such a wonderful role model and showing me what it means to be committed to a cause. Next, I want to thank Carole Blair for her mentorship over the last seven years. Carole and her partner Bill Balthrop are the reason I pursued a Ph.D. Thank you both for holding my hand every step of the way. Thank you for attending all of my conference panels, sending me notes of encouragement, and always being there when I needed a pep talk. I will be a better teacher and mentor because of you. A special thanks to Carole for agreeing to be on my committee and for contributing so much to my growth as a scholar and a person. Next, I would like to thank Barry Brummett for forcing me to embrace the methodology section. I know it needs to be there. I do not know why I fought it for so long. Also, thank you to Paul Bolin for being such a supportive teacher and committee member throughout the process. I am so grateful I took your class as soon as I got to Texas. Finally, thank you Sharon Jarvis. You are a saint. You make such insightful contributions and always found caring ways to convey your concerns. Thank you for your time, comments, and commitment to your students. Susan Corbin, thank you for helping me out with schedules, paperwork, and everything else imaginable. I am indebted to you all. Thank you. Thank you. I also want to thank everyone at UT who made the experience so memorable and (relatively) painless. When living in the Hopper got depressing, I could always count on my iv wonderful friends and colleagues to boost my spirits. First, Kristin Stimpson, where do I begin? You really are my scholar soul mate. I cannot imagine what graduate school would have been like without you. Thank you for the encouragement, the love, and the occasional tough love. Your outlook on life inspires me. Next, Kayla Rhidenour, you are the most patient and kind roommate a girl could ask for. Thank you for never judging me when I sat in the same spot typing for days at a time. I look forward to all of our future travels. Matt Morris, thank you for being my constant friend for the past four years. I loved our lunch breaks and dance breaks. You are a true friend. MaryAnne Taylor, thank you for the real talk and the love of NCAA basketball. I could always count on you for a reality check. Lastly, Maegan Stephens, you are the id I wish I could be. Thank you for making all of our lives livelier. I also want to thank Andrew Ishak for the pick-up games and Gamze Yilmaz for putting up with me as a roommate. If nothing else, we can always open up a Middle Eastern restaurant in Austin. Last, but certainly not least, I want to thank my wonderful family. Rob, Audrey, and Bobby, thank you for all of the Skype sessions, cards, and support. You have always been there for me. I love you. To all of my grandparents, thank you for supporting me and loving me. Granny, thank you for telling me to get my Ph.D. Grandma, thank you for always being interested in my progress. Thank you to the Hesters and Vickers for all of their support. I am so lucky to have you. I also want to thank the Dawes-Klinger family for encouragement, interest, and Grand Canyon hikes. Lastly, I want to thank my Mom and Dad. Even though I frequently felt that my Dad had misinformed me when insisting that writing a dissertation was a ‘labor of love,’ I could not have asked for more loving, understanding, and supportive parents. Any success I have is because of you. I hope you know how much I love and appreciate everything about you. Mom, thank you for writing all of those stupid page numbers. You are amazing. v One final thanks needs to go to my cats, Mother Jones and Houdini. Kidding, only kidding. To my partner, Conrad Hester, your love carried me through the last few years of this process. Your encouragement always came at the right time and your proofreading is the only reason I passed. You supported me intellectually, emotionally, and with an endless supply of Hot Tamales. Thank you. I am so glad you asked me to define “trauma” the first time we met. I can now tell you it means marrying someone while they are writing a dissertation. You are my great love. Thank you. vi ABSTRACT Working through a Monumental Break Up: Ideological Transitions, Ironic Monumental Disruptions, and Public Deliberation Publication No.___________________ Sarah Ellen Vartabedian, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2012 Supervisor: Dana Cloud At present the literature of counter-monument studies does not account for the complex interactions of irony and nostalgia in memorial spaces. The three case studies examined in this project show that nostalgia can produce critically engaging spaces of deliberation depending on how ironic commemoration intervenes in comic or tragic frames. In order to show that more rhetorical focus is possible, I have challenged the conceptualization of counter-monument studies through what I have termed the “ironic monumental disruption.” Monument studies must address how the idea of the counter-monument, in which the "counter" supposedly resides in the artifact itself, valorizes monolithic critiques and fails to recognize that contexts, interactions, and artifacts all shape the symbolism of the commemorative site. Alternatively, ironic monumental disruptions offer critical and deliberative opportunities in their interactions with visitors and provide more conceptual insight into transitional commemorative practices. The monuments reviewed in this project initially appeared to provide additional reinforcement for escapist, capitalist narratives, but my examination of them has revealed that allowing for (ironic) vii commemorative contradictions provides discursive openings for publics unknowingly silenced by a lack of public deliberation. Commemorative irony produces valuable insights into the current historical moment and the representational issues created by ideological transitions. The citizens of Bosnia, Bulgaria, and Hungary express varying levels of nostalgia about their communist past, which is why the commemorative sites within these countries create a valuable spectrum of ironic and nostalgic entanglements. Commemorative irony produces valuable insights into the current historical moment and the representational issues created by ideological transitions. viii Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... xii Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 Irony and Nostalgia in an Ambivalent Age: Arguing for the Concept of Ironic Monumental Disruption ...........................................................................................3 The Cast of Characters, Commemorative Questions, and Definitional Clarifications ........5 Post-Communist Commemoration and Kung-Fu: Situating the Case Studies ..................10 Bulgaria ..................................................................................................................12 Yugoslavia .............................................................................................................13 Hungary..................................................................................................................16 An Overview of the Chapters ............................................................................................20 The Political Promise of Ironic Monumental Disruptions .................................................24 Chapter One: Public Monuments to Political Transitions: Rhetorical Foundations ......................27 The Emergence of “Public Memory ..................................................................................29 The Materialization of Public Memory and Identity: Memory Places, Nostalgia, and Comic and Tragic Framing ....................................................................................31 Monuments as Ideological Microcosms ............................................................................36 Confrontations with Monuments and Memory Places.......................................................40 Finding Space for Irony, Nostalgia, and Confrontation in the Monumentality Literature ................................................................................................................43
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unifications
    BRIDGING THE DIVIDES-‘UNIFICATIONS’ OF MOSTAR By Jelena Mitrovic Submitted to Central European University Nationalism Studies Program In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of CEU eTD Collection Master of Arts Advisor: Florian Bieber Budapest, Hungary 2008 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1. -DEALING WITH DIVERSITY – MULTICULTURAL (MULTIETHNIC) OR COSMOPOLITAN BOSNIA? ............................................................................................................9 1.1. Solution for the conflict in Bosnia – debates on organizing the new state ................................11 1.2. Entrenching the Divide – Bosnia after Dayton ........................................................................15 1.2.1. Constituent peoples and minorities in Bosnia ...................................................................16 CHAPTER 2.- A DIVIDED CITY – (MULTI) ETHNIC MOSTAR: FROM 1994-2004 ...................24 2.1. History of Mostar...................................................................................................................25 2.2. A Tale of the Divided City –Interim Statute and the Role of International Community 1994- 2004 .............................................................................................................................................27 CHAPTER 3. - BRIDGING THE DIVIDES – ADMINISTRATIVE AND SYMBOLIC ‘UNIFICATIONS’ OF MOSTAR.....................................................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Myths and Realities of Coexistence in the Divided and United Town of Mostar Vanni D’Alessio
    Mediterranean Research Meeting 2010 WORKSHOP NUMBER 6 Who is Who in the Balkans Today: Mythmaking and Identity Mutations 1989-2009 directed by: Vjekoslav Perica, University of Rijeka/Fiume, Croatia Darko Gavrilovic, Singidunum University, Serbia Myths and Realities of Coexistence in the Divided and United town of Mostar Vanni D’Alessio Myths and Realities of Coexistence in the Divided and United town of Mostar This paper analyses the transformation of the urban public space, and the trends towards social, political and cultural integration and separation of Mostar in the 1990s and 2000s. The focus of the research is on the postwar processes of division and unification of the city and their traces and evidences in the public space and in the urban socialization mechanisms1. Introduction The division of Mostar into two separate towns started in 1993, during the early 1990s war in Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH). The first part of the war had ended in 1993 with the withdrawal of the Yugoslavian army and the Serb military forces from the town, followed by the disappearance of the Serb component of Mostar. Very few Serbs remained in town. Most of them reached the nearby areas controlled by Serb military forces, other parts of the country or Serbia, or moved to foreign countries, sharing the destiny of other Bosnian refugees, of Croatian, Bosniak (Bosnian Muslim) and Yugoslav affiliations. Some of the refugees who fled from Mostar have returned after the war, but almost all of them have remained in Republika Srpska or abroad. According to the 1991 census the Serbs were around the 18-19% of the overall municipality (op_ina) population (126.628 people) and of the population of the inner Mostar town (grad, 75.865 people), while the declared Yugoslavs numbered a little more than 10% in the municipality and over 15% in town2.
    [Show full text]
  • VELIOGLU-DISSERTATION.Pdf
    Copyright by Halide Velioglu 2011 The Dissertation Committee for Halide Velioglu certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: BOSNIAK SENTIMENTS: The Poetic and Mundane Life of Impossible Longings Committee: ____________________________________ Kathleen C. Stewart, Supervisor ____________________________________ Pauline T. Strong, Co-Supervisor ____________________________________ Elizabeth L. Keating ____________________________________ Kamran A. Ali ____________________________________ Mary Neuburger ____________________________________ John Downing BOSNIAK SENTIMENTS: The Poetic and Mundane Life of Impossible Longings by Halide Velioglu, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2011 Dedication For My Mother and My Aunt Acknowledgements “Bosniak Sentiments” is the culmination of my strong attachments to the motherland. I am thankful to all my beloveds on and around these pages who shared coffee and conversations (and cigarettes) throughout this work with me. My special and hearty gratitude goes to the Sprzo family that made this work possible by all means. Thank you also to the Melic and Kurtovic families, and Stanic sisters for sharing their mundane lives generously with me. I will always be indebted to Teta Seka’s friendship and care as well as Lejla and Zora (in memoriam) for being the best konas I could ever imagine. Thanks to the Department of Anthropology, the Graduate School, Rhonda Andrews (in memoriam), Elizabeth (in memoriam) and Robert Fernea, and Sharmila Rudrappa for the financial support in the form of teaching and research assistantships and fellowships. Nukhet Sirman was the initial motive for me to pursue a graduate degree in Anthropology like many other Social Science students from Bogazici University, Istanbul.
    [Show full text]
  • Ekrany 56 Ang Cc21.Indd
    Socialist Entertainment Publisher Stowarzyszenie Przyjaciół Czasopisma o Tematyce Audiowizualnej „Ekrany” Wydział Zarządzania i Komunikacji Społecznej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego w Krakowie Publisher ’s Address ul. Prof. St. Łojasiewicza 4, pok. 3.222 30 ‍‑348 Kraków e ‍‑mail: [email protected] www.ekrany.org.pl Editorial Team Miłosz Stelmach (Editor‑in‑Chief) Maciej Peplinski (Guest Editor) Barbara Szczekała (Deputy Editor‑in‑Chief) Michał Lesiak (Editorial Secretary) Marta Stańczyk Kamil Kalbarczyk Academic Board prof. dr hab. Alicja Helman, prof. dr hab. Tadeusz Lubelski, prof. dr hab. Grażyna Stachówna, prof. dr hab. Tadeusz Szczepański, prof. dr hab. Eugeniusz Wilk, prof. dr hab. Andrzej Gwóźdź, prof. dr hab. Andrzej Pitrus, prof. dr hab. Krzysztof Loska, prof. dr hab. Małgorzata Radkiewicz, dr hab. Jacek Ostaszewski, prof. UJ, dr hab. Rafał Syska, prof. UJ, dr hab. Łucja Demby, prof. UJ, dr hab. Joanna Wojnicka, prof. UJ, dr hab. Anna Nacher, prof. UJ Graphic design Katarzyna Konior www.bluemango.pl Typesetting Piotr Kołodziej Proofreading Biuro Tłumaczeń PWN Gedruckt mit Unterstützung des Leibniz‑Instituts für Geschichte und Kultur des östlichen Europa e. V. in Leipzig. Diese Maßnahme wird mitfinanziert durch Steuermittel auf der Grundlage des vom Sächsischen Landtag beschlossenen Haushaltes. Front page image: Pat & Mat, courtesy of Tomáš Eiselt at Patmat Ltd. 4/2020 Table of Contents Reframing Socialist 4 The Cinema We No Longer Feel Ashamed of Cinema | Ewa Mazierska 11 Paradoxes of Popularity | Balázs Varga 18 Socialist
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 POSTWAR IMAGES and IDENTITIES of MOSTAR
    Chapter 5 POSTWAR IMAGES AND IDENTITIES OF MOSTAR Before the 1992-1995 war in Bosnia-Hercegovina, Mostar was recognized and appreciated both locally and internationally as one of the most important historic urban ensembles in the region. It was also known as a quintessential Bosnian city with a culturally mixed population and urban form that reflected its position as a point of cultural intersection. Most argue that this multicultural image of the city was lost during the recent war, but there has been little consensus as to what new urban identity has replaced it. In fact, the intersection of various local cultures and the international community in postwar Mostar has led to numerous, competing visions of Mostar. How Mostar has been seen and understood and the nature of its urban identity in the past decade has been influenced by the destruction, demographic change, and mobilization of competing nationalisms that took place during the war. In addition, events of the postwar period, especially reconstruction and new building programs, have also greatly influenced Mostar’s image. As perceptions of the city and of sites within it have both been continuously revised, these discussions have become inseparable and mutually influential. Each new architectural, urban, or reconstruction project in the city can only be understood within the context of Mostar’s overall meaning and symbolism, but this urban identity is at the same time also affected by each individual project. 338 The competing visions of postwar Mostar are also interrelated with the greater national identity debates taking place in Bosnia-Hercegovina today. In addition, like each of the individual construction and reconstruction projects in the city, discussions about Mostar’s postwar identity have also been linked to tensions between reuniting or further dividing the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reference
    Book La ville-martyre: guerre, tourisme et mémoire en ex-Yougoslavie NAEF, Patrick James Abstract Cet ouvrage se place à la croisée de l'anthropologie et de la géographie sociale, analysant le patrimoine culturel et le secteur touristique dans un contexte postconflit. Le cadre d'étude se limite à deux villes, célèbres pour le siège qu'elles ont vécu durant les guerres qui ont meurtri l'ex-Yougoslavie dans les années 1990 : Vukovar, une ville secondaire de Slavonie, en Croatie orientale, et Sarajevo, la capitale de la Bosnie-Herzégovine. Vingt ans après la fin des conflits, des sites sont toujours en ruines, et certains lieux de mémoire sont devenus des symboles incontournables de la guerre, au niveau local comme au niveau international. Si les immeubles détruits, les mines antipersonnel et les impacts de mortiers disparaissent progressivement du paysage, certaines traces sont encore présentes, conservées volontairement ou laissées à l'abandon. En outre, des pratiques – muséales, touristiques, artistiques – participent également à la patrimonialisation de ces conflits, à travers la mobilisation d'objets contemporains de ces événements (la muséification d'un site guerrier) ou par la [...] Reference NAEF, Patrick James. La ville-martyre: guerre, tourisme et mémoire en ex-Yougoslavie . Genève : Slatkine, 2016, 368 p. Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:85084 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 tus_27_couv_broche_tus_13_couv 03.05.16 08:04 Page1 Patrick Naef Patrick Naef LA VILLE MARTYRE Cet ouvrage se place à la croisée de l’anthropologie et de la géographie sociale, analysant le patrimoine culturel et le secteur touristique dans un contexte postconflit.
    [Show full text]
  • Vanni D'alessio Divided and Contested Cities in Modern European History. the Example of Mostar, Bosnia-Herzegovina
    Vanni D’Alessio Divided and Contested Cities in Modern European History. The Example of Mostar, Bosnia-Herzegovina November 9, 1989 was marked by the fall of the Berlin wall: the most famous divided city of 1920 th century Europe was finally on its way to reunification. 1 Four years later, on the same day, the Old Bridge of Mostar was destroyed. For the old inhabitants this event marked the death of their pluralist city; for specta- tors around the world, horrified that war once again raged in the heart of the European continent, Mostar staked a claim of its own to the title of Europe’s most renowned divided city. It contended for this dubious distinction with Nic- osia and Belfast, though no European city could compete with Jerusalem in this regard. The story of divided Berlin has very little in common with the stories of Mostar, Belfast, Nicosia and Jerusalem. The German city was divided in the aftermath of a world war and during the Cold War confrontation. Berlin was not divided as a result of civil war or internal strife for hegemony or domination within the city or in its wider area. Nor were outside powers present to contain a local conflict or to divide and quit , the way Britain did as it left its former colo- nial possessions. There had been no ethnonational rivalry over Berlin. Instead, these are all elements of the division of the other mentioned cities and their deep-rooted political and cultural contentions. While it is quite easy to see Ber- lin as a German city, it is not as easy to classify the other cities nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Elke Erb (Germany), Željko Ivanković (Bih), Kayoko Yamasaki (Japan
    THE OFFICIAL PROGRAMME OF 48th ANNUAL SARAJEVO POETRY DAYS Wednesday 6 May 2009 Opening ceremony Participants: Šaban Abak (Turkey), Anne Bøe (Norway), Munib Delali (BiH, Norway), Elke Erb (Germany), Željko Ivankovi (BiH), Kayoko Yamasaki (Japan), Ivan Kordi (BiH), Kemal Mahmutefendi (BiH), Radomir Mitri (BiH), Petar Opa i (Croatia), Marija Šimokovi (Serbia), Tanja Stupar Trifunovi (BiH). Introduction : Mile Stoji Host: Aida Krehi Musical program: Edin Bahti ’s quintet Youth House Skenderija , 13:00 Hommage to Ahmet Hromadži Exhibition The Life and Work of Ahmet Hromadži Participants: : Irfan Horozovi , Ibrahim Kajan Museum of Literature and Theatre Art BH Mak Gallery, 18:30h Sime Milutinovi a 7 Living classics Participants: Bisera Alikadi , Veselko Koroman, Dara Sekuli Speakers: prof. dr. Enver Kazaz, Željko Ivankovi , Stevan Tonti Kamerni teatar 55 , 21:00h Titova st. 55 Thursday 7 May 2009 My poetics – Autopoetic confessions Participants: Elke Erb (Germany), Kayoko Jamasaki (Japan), Eldrid Lunden (Norway), Duško Novakovi (Serbia), Faruk Šehi (BiH) Editor and moderator : Stevan Tonti Kamerni teatar 55 – Gabrijel gallery , 11:00h Titova st. 55 Exhibition of Tatjana Milakovi Speakers: Senadin Musabegovi Gallery of New Temple 14,00h Contemporary Norway poetry Participants: Finn Øgl nd, Øyvind Berg, Eldrid Lunden, Anne Bøe, Arnt Birkedal, Moderator: Munib Delali Recitation: Alena Džebo Bosniac Institute, 19:00h Mula Mustafe Bašeskije 21 My Poetics, poetry evening Participants: Elke Erb (Germany), Kayoko Jamasaki (Japan), Eldrid Lunden (Norway), Duško Novakovi (Serbia), Faruk Šehi (BiH) Host: Dragan Jovi i Musical program: Edin Bahti ’s quintet Coloseum Club, 21:00h Skenderija – Terezije bb Friday 8 Maj 2009 Literary afternoon with pupils Participants: Wilhelm Bartch (Germany), Ismet Bekri (BiH), Predrag Bjeloševi (BiH), Kemal Coco (BiH), Šefik Daupovi (BiH), Husein Derviševi (BiH), Dejan onovi (Montenegro), Finn Øgl nd (Norway), Bajruzin Hajro Planjac (BiH), Vjekoslav Vukadin (BiH), Blaga Žuri (Montenegro).
    [Show full text]
  • Dodik in Bratunac Was “The Most Dangerous Statement Given by an Official in Bih Since the Dayton Peace Agreement Was Signed”
    WB WESTERN BALKANS Daily e-newspaper • N° 4088 • Sarajevo, July 18, 2017 e-MEDIA GROUP BAKIR IZETBEGOVIC RS Leader Openly Violated Dayton Agreement Leader of the main Bosniak party and a member in the BiH Presidency urged the state prosecution and the international overseer of the peace agreement implementation in Bosnia to sanction Bosnian Serb leader for hate speech against Bosniak returnees akir Izetbegovic said a July 7 state - ment of the Republika Srpska pres - Bident Milorad Dodik in Bratunac was “the most dangerous statement given by an official in BiH since the Dayton Peace Agreement was signed”. At a commemoration for Serb victims of the Bosnian war in eastern Bosnia, Dodik accused unnamed Islamic organiza - tions of financing the return of expelled Bosniaks to the region bordering Serbia, in a bid to “occupy the Drina river (region) again”. "Milorad Dodik made an open anti- constitutional and anti-Dayton state - ment, committing a criminal offence (defined by) the Criminal Code of BiH. Since there was no expected reaction from the Prosecutor's Office of BiH and the OHR, I addressed those Bosnian Bakir Izetbegovic and international institutions, as well as Bosniaks were occupiers in the Drina return, under the Dayton Peace members of the PIC Steering Board, river region until 1992, which is why (the Agreement and the Constitution of asking them to react and sanction this Serbs) forced them to leave their homes Bosnia and Herzegovina, is a repeated kind of behavior of the RS president," (...) by committing war crimes, crimes occupation of that part of Bosnia and said Izetbegovic.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Alternative Geographies, Politics and Identities in Bosnia and Herzegovina Through Contemporary Art Practices
    Exploring alternative geographies, politics and identities in Bosnia and Herzegovina through contemporary art practices Charlotte Whelan Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) UCL, Geography ! Statement of Originality I, Charlotte Whelan, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. I confirm that it is the result of my own original research and not the result of a collaborative project. I confirm that the thesis has not previously been submitted in part or full for a degree award at UCL or any other University. Signature: Date: ! Abstract An extensive literature in political geography has examined the breakup of Yugoslavia and the contested politics of its successor states. Bosnia and Herzegovina has been a focus of particular attention due to the scale of violence that took place there and its complexity as the most multicultural state in Yugoslavia. However, existing studies have tended to maintain a focus on wartime events and the post-war fragmentation of the country, overlooking the ways in which these are being reworked creatively outside of orthodox political channels. In light of growing geographical interest in art, the thesis examines how Bosnia is being reworked through artistic practices and the implications of this for understandings of the region. Conceptually, the thesis draws on feminist and subaltern approaches to geopolitics as well as debates in art theory and practice. Methodologically, it is based on ethnographic fieldwork and participation in ongoing art projects, as well as research on Yugoslav and post-Yugoslav art history.
    [Show full text]