Citation and Similar Papers at Core.Ac.Ukw

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Citation and Similar Papers at Core.Ac.Ukw 4 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19670007176 2020-03-16T18:43:02+00:00Z View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.ukw .. -. brought to you by CORE I provided by NASA Technical Reports Server 1 . National Aeronautics and STace Administration Goddard Space Flight Center C ont r ac t No NAS -5 -f 7 60 THE OUTERMOST BELT OF CFLARGED PARTICLES _- .- - by K. I, Grin,yaue t: M, 2. I~alOkhlOV cussa 3 GPO PRICE $ CFSTI PRICE(S) $ 17 NOVEbI3ER 1965 Hard copy (HC) .J d-0 Microfiche (M F) ,J3’ ff 853 July 85 Issl. kosniicheskogo prostrznstva by K. N. Gringaua Trudy Vsesoyuzrloy koneferentsii & M. z. Khokhlov po kosaiches?%inlucham, 467 - 482 Noscon, June 1965. This report deals with the result of the study of a eone of char- ged pxticles with comparatively low ener-ies (from -100 ev to 10 - 4Okev), situated beyond the outer rzdiation belt (including the new data obtained on Ilectron-2 and Zond-2). 'The cutkors review, first of all, an2 in chronolo~icalorder, the space probes on which data on soft electrons 'and protons were obtained beyond the rsdistion belts. A brief review is given of soae examples of regis- tration of soft electrons at high geominetic latitudes by Mars-1 and Elec- tron-2. It is shown that here, BS in other space probes, the zones of soft electron flwcys are gartly overlap7inr with the zones of trapped radiation. The spatial distributio;: of fluxcs of soft electrons is sixdied in liqht of data oStziined fro.1 various sFnce probes, such as Lunik-1, Explorer-12, Explorer-18, for the daytime rerion along the map-etosphere boundary &om the sumy side. The night re-ion of fluxes is exmined fron data provided by Lunik-2, 7xpiorer-12, Z~nd-2~~ni the results of various latest works with reKarr! to the relationshi- of that distribution with the structure of tire marnetic field are exCmined and cornpcved. The essentially new revelation of the magneto-neutral layer on the niRht side is discussed. The temporal vcriations accordin.; to data from Electron-2 are discussed. Finally the p.uthors I.n;ke brief remarks as to the ozigir? af snft electrons 2nd in conclusion they emphasize the imnortance of the outermost zone of charged particles from the geophysical standpoint. A further study is reconnended, pnrticulLvly of the pLvt of the outermost zone where the daytime and nip-httime parts op-arently join near the neutral points on the daytime side and in the mpgneto-neutrzl layer of the nisht part of the zone. * SAP'lYY VTESBNIY POYtS ZA2PAZHE"YKH CH/tSTITS 2. The results of the study of the zone of charged particles beyond the outer radiation belt and whose energies are comparatively low (from - 100 ev to 10-40 kev), are considered in the present work. The study includes more prticularly the new data contributed by observation aboard the satellite Electron-2 and the space rocket Zond-2. As is well known, the Earth's radiation belts were discovered in 1958 during experiments for the study of cosmic rays. In these exneriments the apparatus used was naturally appropriate for the registration of par- ticles with comparatively low enerTies, beginning from tens of kev, and that is why the impression was conveyed at the outset that conditions, cha- racteristic of interplanetary space9 must take place beyond the boundary of the zones of trapred radiation. Xxperiments with charged pnrticle traps on Soviet lunar rockets [l] have revealed that a zone of electron accumulation exists beyond the outer radiation belt near the geomsgnetic equator. In this zone, the concentra- tions and the fluxes exceed considerably those knovm to exist in the outer radiation belt. Accorc'iing to the data of Luna-2, the extension of this zone is of the order of 40000km. The apyearace of intense low-energy particle 8 fluxes ( -10 cm-'.sec'') beyond the outer radiation belt was interpreted as being the result of solar plasma flwtes'interaction with the peripheral regions of the Earth's magnetic ffeld C23. The mechanism indicated in C3] was considered as one of the possible theraalization processes of solar plasma. Scbsequentlg, ether various acceleration mechanisms of solar plasma electrons were also considered [4, 53; however, the basic idea of emergence of the outermost radiation belt, visualizedasaresult of certain boundmy effects of solar plasma fluxes' interaction with the Earth's magnetic field figlly kept its si,gnificance. Although more than five years have elapsed since the detection of this zone by Soviet lunar rockets, a significant part of the works devoted to it appeared only after 1962, so that the terminology, referring to it, is still unsettled. At the outset is was called the !'third radiation belt" C6, 71. TbLen, in 1961 it was proposed C81, in order to underline the distinc- tion of the physical properties of this zone from the radiation belts, to call this intermediate zone of ei:istence of low-energy charged particles, situated between the zone of trapped radiation and the unperturbed SO&= 3. wizld, the outermost belt of charged particles (see.also [9, 103, or, later on, the outermost sone of charged par- t i c 1 e s CUI. Other denomin-tions, and in particular the one proposed in I [12] for fluxes of soft charged particles beyond the boundary of trapped ra- diation c12], namely n auroral radiation", appear to us less fortunate. Table 1 shows in chronological order (according to launching data) the space probes on which were obtained data on soft electron and proton fluxes beyond the radiation belts, alongside with the method of their obser- vations and the values of the angle x3c (see further the Fig, 71, correspond- inc to the moments of observations. The orbits of most of the space probes enumerated in the table, passe2 near the ecliptic plane. To the number of devices on which fluxes of electrons with energies Ee>lOO ev were observed beyond the boundary of trapTed radiation at high latitudes (and more remote from Earth), so far refer only to Mars-1 and Electron-2. 2. - OBSE2V;;TIONS- AT L0I.J UTITUDES Because of the lack of space we shall limit ourselves here to a brief review of soxe characteristic exxnples of registration of soft electron f luxe3. -".Ine rck;istr:Ltions nf the collector currents of the integral type of charmed particle traps, installed aboard the space rocket Luna-2, launched at the night side, are plotted in Fig.1 . Plotted in the same figure are the data of counter indications of hi3her-energy particles, installed on the reeke+ c207, As may be seen from the diagram, the zone of intensive fluxes of soft electrons are in the consicered case, entiraly beyond the zone of registration of enereetic pzrticles. During experiments aboard Luna-1, fired on the dayliyht side, these zones noticeably overlapped. It should be noted thst the trajectory of Luna-2 passed near the YcomFgnetic equator and crossed it near -8.5 RE. 4. TABLE 1 Space Probe Launching Method of measurements Date Ref erencc %* I LUNA- 1 1 Jan.1959 285 Integral Trap (Electrons with energy E, 7200 ev LUNA- 2 12 Sep.1959 135 Same EXPLOREZ-12 16 Sep.1961 285-36 Integral Detector CdS & 225 (Ec > 200 - 500 ev) MARS- 1 1 Nov.1962 CUI 200 Integral Trap (Ee>lOO ev) EXPLORER- 18 27 Nov.1963 C161 Sane I [17] 270-360Modulation trap (ionsEiNkev, electrons 65- 210 ev) EIECTRON- 2 30 Jan.1964 Ci81 IElectrostatic analyzer ~ (Ions E;- kev) - 290 & Integral trap (electrons 210 with E, > 100 ev) ~ C19 3 Electrostatic analyzer (ions and electrons with E Y 100 ev - 10kev) ZOND- 2 30 Nov.1964 c113 230 Integral Trap (electrons with E, 770ev) L Axis the angle between the directions Earth-Sun and Earth-AES ** ** the original denotation 'Y4 being maintained throughout. I Fig.1. - Collector currents of integral charged particle traps Cl] and counting rate of hard radiationC201 1- upper limit of collector currents in traps with damping grid '0 s - 10, - 5 and 0 v; 2 - lower limit of the same currents; 3- uplyer limit of currents in the trap with '4 = 15~;4 - counting rate in relative units. 5. The intensity course of electron fluxes registered at the daytime side with the aid of integral trap inetalled abowd Explorer-18 is shown in Fig. 2 C16J. As in the case of Luna-2 the electron fluxes were observed on both I sides of the boundary of trapped radia- tion (on the daylight side near the geo- mxgnetic equator the latter coincides with the boundary of the magnetosphere). Owing to the fact that the orbit apogee of Explorer-18 lay at great qistances from Earth, the outer boundary of the zone of thernnlized solar plasma vas also regis- Fig. 2. - E?.ectrm fluxes with this boundary is identified tered on it; E, 7 100 ev according to data witk the shock wave front. of the integral trap installed aboard Eicplorer- 18 [16] I Proton fluxes were registered in the entire transitional reFion beyond the magnetosphere boundary with the aid of a modulation trap [17] (they were also measured with the help of the I electrostatic analyzer with energies to -5 kev toyether with the omnidirectio-- nal fluxes of electrons in the 65- 210 ev range [17]). In the transitional re-ion, the intensity of fluxes of protons, originating from the side of the Sun exceeded by ?bout a factor of 2 the intensity of the fluxes from opposite direction. 2stl obtained on Explorer-12 at intersection by the probe of the maanetasphere boundary from the subsolar side on 13 3ovembe-r -nfiL~UL aL--- --im++Par*wv--- in the Fig.
Recommended publications
  • University of Iowa Instruments in Space
    University of Iowa Instruments in Space A-D13-089-5 Wind Van Allen Probes Cluster Mercury Earth Venus Mars Express HaloSat MMS Geotail Mars Voyager 2 Neptune Uranus Juno Pluto Jupiter Saturn Voyager 1 Spaceflight instruments designed and built at the University of Iowa in the Department of Physics & Astronomy (1958-2019) Explorer 1 1958 Feb. 1 OGO 4 1967 July 28 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Launch Date Launch Date Launch Date Spacecraft Spacecraft Spacecraft Explorer 3 (U1T9)58 Mar. 26 Injun 5 1(U9T68) Aug. 8 (UT) ExpEloxrpelro r1e r 4 1915985 8F eJbu.l y1 26 OEGxOpl o4rer 41 (IMP-5) 19697 Juunlye 2 281 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Explorer 2 (launch failure) 1958 Mar. 5 OGO 5 1968 Mar. 4 Van Allen Probe A * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 3er 1 1915985 8M Oarc. t2. 611 InEjuxnp lo5rer 45 (SSS) 197618 NAouvg.. 186 Van Allen Probe B * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 4er 2 1915985 8Ju Nlyo 2v.6 8 EUxpKlo 4r e(rA 4ri1el -(4IM) P-5) 197619 DJuenc.e 1 211 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 1 * 2015 Mar. 12 ExpPloiorenre 5e r 3 (launch failure) 1915985 8A uDge.c 2. 46 EPxpiolonreeerr 4130 (IMP- 6) 19721 Maarr.. 313 HMEaRgCnIe CtousbpeShaetr i(cF oMxu-1ltDis scaatelell itMe)i ssion / 2 * 2021081 J5a nM. a1r2. 12 PionPeioenr e1er 4 1915985 9O cMt.a 1r.1 3 EExpxlpolorerer r4 457 ( S(IMSSP)-7) 19721 SNeopvt.. 1263 HMaalogSnaett oCsupbhee Sriact eMlluitlet i*scale Mission / 3 * 2021081 M5a My a2r1. 12 Pioneer 2 1958 Nov. 8 UK 4 (Ariel-4) 1971 Dec. 11 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 4 * 2015 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Summaries
    TIROS 8 12/21/63 Delta-22 TIROS-H (A-53) 17B S National Aeronautics and TIROS 9 1/22/65 Delta-28 TIROS-I (A-54) 17A S Space Administration TIROS Operational 2TIROS 10 7/1/65 Delta-32 OT-1 17B S John F. Kennedy Space Center 2ESSA 1 2/3/66 Delta-36 OT-3 (TOS) 17A S Information Summaries 2 2 ESSA 2 2/28/66 Delta-37 OT-2 (TOS) 17B S 2ESSA 3 10/2/66 2Delta-41 TOS-A 1SLC-2E S PMS 031 (KSC) OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories) Lunar and Planetary 2ESSA 4 1/26/67 2Delta-45 TOS-B 1SLC-2E S June 1999 OSO 1 3/7/62 Delta-8 OSO-A (S-16) 17A S 2ESSA 5 4/20/67 2Delta-48 TOS-C 1SLC-2E S OSO 2 2/3/65 Delta-29 OSO-B2 (S-17) 17B S Mission Launch Launch Payload Launch 2ESSA 6 11/10/67 2Delta-54 TOS-D 1SLC-2E S OSO 8/25/65 Delta-33 OSO-C 17B U Name Date Vehicle Code Pad Results 2ESSA 7 8/16/68 2Delta-58 TOS-E 1SLC-2E S OSO 3 3/8/67 Delta-46 OSO-E1 17A S 2ESSA 8 12/15/68 2Delta-62 TOS-F 1SLC-2E S OSO 4 10/18/67 Delta-53 OSO-D 17B S PIONEER (Lunar) 2ESSA 9 2/26/69 2Delta-67 TOS-G 17B S OSO 5 1/22/69 Delta-64 OSO-F 17B S Pioneer 1 10/11/58 Thor-Able-1 –– 17A U Major NASA 2 1 OSO 6/PAC 8/9/69 Delta-72 OSO-G/PAC 17A S Pioneer 2 11/8/58 Thor-Able-2 –– 17A U IMPROVED TIROS OPERATIONAL 2 1 OSO 7/TETR 3 9/29/71 Delta-85 OSO-H/TETR-D 17A S Pioneer 3 12/6/58 Juno II AM-11 –– 5 U 3ITOS 1/OSCAR 5 1/23/70 2Delta-76 1TIROS-M/OSCAR 1SLC-2W S 2 OSO 8 6/21/75 Delta-112 OSO-1 17B S Pioneer 4 3/3/59 Juno II AM-14 –– 5 S 3NOAA 1 12/11/70 2Delta-81 ITOS-A 1SLC-2W S Launches Pioneer 11/26/59 Atlas-Able-1 –– 14 U 3ITOS 10/21/71 2Delta-86 ITOS-B 1SLC-2E U OGO (Orbiting Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • Ionospheric Cusp Flows Pulsed by Solar Wind Alfvén Waves
    c Annales Geophysicae (2002) 20: 161–174 European Geophysical Society 2002 Annales Geophysicae Ionospheric cusp flows pulsed by solar wind Alfven´ waves P. Prikryl1, G. Provan2, K. A. McWilliams2, and T. K. Yeoman2 1Communications Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario K2H 8S2, Canada 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, UK Received: 7 February 2001 – Revised: 24 August 2001 – Accepted: 10 September 2001 Abstract. Pulsed ionospheric flows (PIFs) in the cusp foot- bow shock were the source of magnetopause surface waves print have been observed by the SuperDARN radars with inducing reconnection. periods between a few minutes and several tens of minutes. Key words. Interplanetary physics (MHD waves and PIFs are believed to be a consequence of the interplanetary turbulence) – Magnetospheric physics (magnetosphere- magnetic field (IMF) reconnection with the magnetospheric ionosphere interactions; solar wind-magnetosphere interac- magnetic field on the dayside magnetopause, ionospheric tions) signatures of flux transfer events (FTEs). The quasiperiodic PIFs are correlated with Alfvenic´ fluctuations observed in the upstream solar wind. It is concluded that on these occasions, the FTEs were driven by Alfven´ waves coupling to the day- 1 Introduction side magnetosphere. Case studies are presented in which the dawn-dusk component of the Alfven´ wave electric field mod- Ionospheric dynamics near the cusp footprint attest to pro- ulates the reconnection rate as evidenced by the radar obser- cesses at the dayside magnetopause and in particular, to vations of the ionospheric cusp flows. The arrival of the IMF pulsed magnetic reconnection (Cowley et al., 1991; Lock- southward turning at the magnetopause is determined from wood et al., 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive
    CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY HAER FL-8-B BUILDING AE HAER FL-8-B (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Hanger AE) Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING AE (Hangar AE) HAER NO. FL-8-B Location: Hangar Road, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Industrial Area, Brevard County, Florida. USGS Cape Canaveral, Florida, Quadrangle. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: E 540610 N 3151547, Zone 17, NAD 1983. Date of Construction: 1959 Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Present Use: Home to NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) and the Launch Vehicle Data Center (LVDC). The LVDC allows engineers to monitor telemetry data during unmanned rocket launches. Significance: Missile Assembly Building AE, commonly called Hangar AE, is nationally significant as the telemetry station for NASA KSC’s unmanned Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) program. Since 1961, the building has been the principal facility for monitoring telemetry communications data during ELV launches and until 1995 it processed scientifically significant ELV satellite payloads. Still in operation, Hangar AE is essential to the continuing mission and success of NASA’s unmanned rocket launch program at KSC. It is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A in the area of Space Exploration as Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) original Mission Control Center for its program of unmanned launch missions and under Criterion C as a contributing resource in the CCAFS Industrial Area Historic District.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Ionospheric Conductivity on Magnetospheric Dynamics
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Fall 2018 THE EFFECT OF IONOSPHERIC CONDUCTIVITY ON MAGNETOSPHERIC DYNAMICS Benjamin Joseph Jensen University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Jensen, Benjamin Joseph, "THE EFFECT OF IONOSPHERIC CONDUCTIVITY ON MAGNETOSPHERIC DYNAMICS" (2018). Doctoral Dissertations. 2414. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2414 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECT OF IONOSPHERIC CONDUCTIVITY ON MAGNETOSPHERIC DYNAMICS BY JOSEPH B. JENSEN BS, Physics, Utah State University, Logan UT, 2013 DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics September 2018 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ©2018 Joseph B. Jensen This dissertation has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics by: Dissertation Advisor, Joachim Raeder, Professor, Department of Physics University of New Hampshire Lynn Kistler, Professor,Department of Physics University of New Hampshire Kai Germaschewski, Associate Professor, Department of Physics University of New Hampshire Marc Lessard, Associate Professor, Department of Physics University of New Hampshire Simon G. Shepherd, Associate Professor of Engineering Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College on 6 July 2018. Original approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Wave Turbulence at the Magnetopause&Colon
    VOL. 84, NO. A12 JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH DECEMBER 1, 1979 Plasma Wave Turbulence at the Magnetopause: Observations From ISEE 1 and 2 D. A. GURNETT,l R. R. ANDERSON,l B. T. TSURUTANI,2 E. J. SMITH,2 G. PASCHMANN,3 G. HAERENDEL,3 $. J. BAME,4 AND C. T. RUSSELLs In this paper we investigateplasma wave electric and magnetic fields in the vicinity of the magneto- pauseby usingrecent measurements from the ISEE 1 and 2 spacecraft.Strong electric and magneticfield turbulenceis often observedat the magnetopause.The electricfield spectrumof this turbulencetypically extendsover an extremelylarge frequencyrange, from lessthan a few hertz to above 100 kHz, and the magneticfield turbulencetypically extends from a few hertz to about 1 kHz. The maximum intensities usually occur in the magnetopausecurrent layer and plasmaboundary layer. Somewhatsimilar turbu- lence spectraare also sometimesobserved in associationwith flux transfer events and possible'in- clusions'of boundarylayer plasma in the magnetosphere.In addition to the broad-bandelectric and magneticfield turbulence,narrow-band electrostatic emissions are occasionallyobserved near the elec- tron plasmafrequency in the vicinity of the magnetopause.Two possibleplasma instabilities, the elec- trostaticion-cyclotron instability and the lower-hybrid-driftinstability, are consideredthe primary can- didatesfor explaining the broad-bandelectric field turbulence.The narrow-bandelectrostatic emissions near the local electron plasma frequency are believed to be either plasma oscillationsor electrostatic wavesnear the upper-hybrid-resonancefrequency. 1. INTRODUCTION waves. Although the magnetopauseis known to be very tur- bulent in the low-frequency MHD portion of the spectrum, Becauseof the many important questionswhich have been relatively little is known about the plasma wave intensitiesat raised recently concerning the physical processeswhich occur higher frequenciesin the region of primary importance for at the earth's magnetopauseboundary [Heikkila, 1975; Hae- microscopicplasma processes.Neugebauer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA
    1 SATELITES ARTIFICIALES. Capítulo 5º Subcap. 10 <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA TIERRA. Esta es una relación cronológica de todos los lanzamientos de satélites artificiales de nuestro planeta, con independencia de su éxito o fracaso, tanto en el disparo como en órbita. Significa pues que muchos de ellos no han alcanzado el espacio y fueron destruidos. Se señala en primer lugar (a la izquierda) su nombre, seguido de la fecha del lanzamiento, el país al que pertenece el satélite (que puede ser otro distinto al que lo lanza) y el tipo de satélite; este último aspecto podría no corresponderse en exactitud dado que algunos son de finalidad múltiple. En los lanzamientos múltiples, cada satélite figura separado (salvo en los casos de fracaso, en que no llegan a separarse) pero naturalmente en la misma fecha y juntos. NO ESTÁN incluidos los llevados en vuelos tripulados, si bien se citan en el programa de satélites correspondiente y en el capítulo de “Cronología general de lanzamientos”. .SATÉLITE Fecha País Tipo SPUTNIK F1 15.05.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK F2 21.08.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 01 04.10.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 02 03.11.1957 URSS Científico VANGUARD-1A 06.12.1957 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 01 31.01.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1B 05.02.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 02 05.03.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1 17.03.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 03 26.03.1958 USA Científico SPUTNIK D1 27.04.1958 URSS Geodésico VANGUARD-2A
    [Show full text]
  • Two-Stage Oscillatory Response of the Magnetopause to a Tangential Discontinuity/Vortex Sheet Followed by Northward IMF: Cluster Observations C
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113, A03208, doi:10.1029/2007JA012800, 2008 Click Here for Full Article Two-stage oscillatory response of the magnetopause to a tangential discontinuity/vortex sheet followed by northward IMF: Cluster observations C. J. Farrugia,1,2 F. T. Gratton,3,4 E. J. Lund,1 P. E. Sandholt,5 S. W. H. Cowley,6 R. B. Torbert,1,2 G. Gnavi,3 I. R. Mann,7 L. Bilbao,3 C. Mouikis,1 L. Kistler,1,2 C. W. Smith,1 H. J. Singer,8 and J. F. Watermann9 Received 6 September 2007; revised 23 November 2007; accepted 10 December 2007; published 19 March 2008. [1] We discuss the motion and structure of the magnetopause/boundary layer observed by Cluster in response to a joint tangential discontinuity/vortex sheet (TD/VS) observed by the Advanced Composition Explorer spacecraft on 7 December 2000. The observations are then supplemented by theory. Sharp polarity reversals in the east-west components of the field and flow By and Vy occurred at the discontinuity. These rotations were followed by a period of strongly northward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). These two factors elicited a two-stage response at the magnetopause, as observed by Cluster situated in the boundary layer at the duskside terminator. First, the magnetopause suffered a large deformation from its equilibrium position, with large-amplitude oscillations of 3-min period being set up. These are argued to be mainly the result of tangential stresses associated with DVy the contribution of dynamic pressure changes being small in comparison. This strengthens recent evidence of the importance to magnetospheric dynamics of changes in azimuthal solar wind flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Astronomia Nova
    Index of Astronomia Nova Index of Astronomia Nova. M. Capderou, Handbook of Satellite Orbits: From Kepler to GPS, 883 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03416-4, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Bibliography Books are classified in sections according to the main themes covered in this work, and arranged chronologically within each section. General Mechanics and Geodesy 1. H. Goldstein. Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass., 1956 2. L. Landau & E. Lifchitz. Mechanics (Course of Theoretical Physics),Vol.1, Mir, Moscow, 1966, Butterworth–Heinemann 3rd edn., 1976 3. W.M. Kaula. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ., Waltham, Mass., 1966 4. J.-J. Levallois. G´eod´esie g´en´erale, Vols. 1, 2, 3, Eyrolles, Paris, 1969, 1970 5. J.-J. Levallois & J. Kovalevsky. G´eod´esie g´en´erale,Vol.4:G´eod´esie spatiale, Eyrolles, Paris, 1970 6. G. Bomford. Geodesy, 4th edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980 7. J.-C. Husson, A. Cazenave, J.-F. Minster (Eds.). Internal Geophysics and Space, CNES/Cepadues-Editions, Toulouse, 1985 8. V.I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (60), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989 9. W. Torge. Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991 10. G. Seeber. Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993 11. E.W. Grafarend, F.W. Krumm, V.S. Schwarze (Eds.). Geodesy: The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium, Springer, Berlin, 2003 12. H. Stephani. Relativity: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity,Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004 13. G. Schubert (Ed.). Treatise on Geodephysics,Vol.3:Geodesy, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007 14. D.D. McCarthy, P.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Variations in the Dayside Magnetosheath and Their
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics RESEARCH ARTICLE Temperature variations in the dayside magnetosheath 10.1002/2016JA023729 and their dependence on ion-scale magnetic structures: Key Points: THEMIS statistics and measurements by MMS • A positive correlation exists between the amplitude of magnetic fluctuations and temperature A. P. Dimmock1 , A. Osmane1 , T. I. Pulkkinen1 , K. Nykyri2 , and E. Kilpua3 variation • Temperature fluctuations are strongly 1 associated with larger local in Department of Electronics and Nanoengineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland, 2 ion-scale magnetic structures than Centre for Space and Atmospheric Research, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA, the fluid input at the shock 3Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland • The amplitude of ion gyroscale fluctuations and in situ temperature variations are favored by the Abstract The magnetosheath contains an array of waves, instabilities, and nonlinear magnetic dawn flank structures which modify global plasma properties by means of various wave-particle interactions. The present work demonstrates that ion-scale magnetic field structures (∼0.2–0.5 Hz) observed in the dayside Correspondence to: A. P. Dimmock, magnetosheath are statistically correlated to ion temperature changes on orders 10–20% of the andrew.dimmock@aalto.fi background value. In addition, our statistical analysis implies that larger temperature changes are in equipartition to larger amplitude magnetic structures. This effect was more pronounced behind the Citation: quasi-parallel bow shock and during faster solar wind speeds. The study of two separate intervals suggests Dimmock, A. P., A. Osmane, that this effect can result from both local and external drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Space Program Firsts
    KSC Historical Report 18 KHR-18 Rev. December 2003 UNITED STATES SPACE PROGRAM FIRSTS Robotic & Human Mission Firsts Kennedy Space Center Library Archives Kennedy Space Center, Florida Foreword This summary of the United States space program firsts was compiled from various reference publications available in the Kennedy Space Center Library Archives. The list is divided into four sections. Robotic mission firsts, Human mission firsts, Space Shuttle mission firsts and Space Station mission firsts. Researched and prepared by: Barbara E. Green Kennedy Space Center Library Archives Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899 phone: [321] 867-2407 i Contents Robotic Mission Firsts ……………………..........................……………...........……………1-4 Satellites, missiles and rockets 1950 - 1986 Early Human Spaceflight Firsts …………………………............................……........…..……5-8 Projects Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Skylab and Apollo Soyuz Test Project 1961 - 1975 Space Shuttle Firsts …………………………….........................…………........……………..9-12 Space Transportation System 1977 - 2003 Space Station Firsts …………………………….........................…………........………………..13 International Space Station 1998-2___ Bibliography …………………………………..............................…………........…………….....…14 ii KHR-18 Rev. December 2003 DATE ROBOTIC EVENTS MISSION 07/24/1950 First missile launched at Cape Canaveral. Bumper V-2 08/20/1953 First Redstone missile was fired. Redstone 1 12/17/1957 First long range weapon launched. Atlas ICBM 01/31/1958 First satellite launched by U.S. Explorer 1 10/11/1958 First observations of Earth’s and interplanetary magnetic field. Pioneer 1 12/13/1958 First capsule containing living cargo, squirrel monkey, Gordo. Although not Bioflight 1 a NASA mission, data was utilized in Project Mercury planning. 12/18/1958 First communications satellite placed in space. Once in place, Brigadier Project Score General Goodpaster passed a message to President Eisenhower 02/17/1959 First fully instrumented Vanguard payload.
    [Show full text]
  • Past, Present and Future Missions C.T
    ESS 265 Instrumentation, Data Processing and Data Analysis in Space Physics Lecture 3: Past, Present and Future Missions C.T. Russell April 6, 2008 1 Early Space Physics Missions • Explorer 10 1961 Battery operated; first measurements across magnetopause (in near tail) • Explorer 12 1961 Measured magnetopause from noon to dawn in eccentric orbit • IMP 1 1963 Mapped location of magnetopause, bow shock and studied near Earth tail • 1963-38C 1963 Discovered field-aligned currents • OGO-1 1964 First high resolution measurements at magnetopause and bow shock • OGO-3 1966 Discovered ELF hiss and chorus in magnetopause • OGO-5 1968 Discovered erosion of the magnetopause. Led to near-Earth neutral line model for substorms 2 Important Recent Space Physics Missions • IMP 7 and 8 1972, 1973 – 2001 • GEOS 1,2 1977, 1978 • ISEE 1,2 1977 – 1987 • ISEE 3 1978 – 1985 • DE 1,2 1982 – 1989 • AMPTE (UKS, IRM, CCE) 1984 – 1986 • SAMPEX (SMEX) 1992 – ? • Geotail (ISTP) 1992 – present • FAST (SMEX) 1994 – present • Wind (GGS, ISTP) 1995 – present • Polar (GGS, ISTP) 1996 – 2008 • Cluster (4 S/C) 1996 – present • IMAGE (MidEx) 2000 – 2006 • TIMED (MidEx) 2001 – 2007 • THEMIS (MidEx) 2007 – present 3 Important Recent Heliospheric and Solar Missions • Voyager 1, 2 1977 – present • Ulysses 1990 – 2008 • SOHO (ISTP) 1995 – present • ACE 1997 – present • TRACE (SMEX) 1998 – present • RHESSI (SMEX) 2002 – present • Hinode 2007 - present 4 Missions in Development and Planning • Twins • Solar Dynamics Observatory • Magnetosphere Multiscale • Radiation Belt Storm Probes
    [Show full text]