5 Orbit and Ground Track of a Satellite

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

5 Orbit and Ground Track of a Satellite 5 Orbit and Ground Track of a Satellite 5.1 Position of the Satellite on its Orbit Let (O; x, y, z) be the Galilean reference frame already defined. The satellite S is in an elliptical orbit around the centre of attraction O. The orbital plane P makes a constant angle i with the equatorial plane E. However, although this plane P is considered as fixed relative to in the Keplerian motion, in a real (perturbed) motion, it will in fact rotate about the polar axis. This is precessional motion,1 occurring with angular speed Ω˙ , as calculated in the last two chapters. A schematic representation of this motion is given in Fig. 5.1. We shall describe the position of S in using the Euler angles. 5.1.1 Position of the Satellite The three Euler angles ψ, θ and χ were introduced in Sect. 2.3.2 to specify the orbit and its perigee in space. In the present case, we wish to specify S. We obtain the correspondence between the Euler angles and the orbital elements using Fig. 2.1: ψ = Ω, (5.1) θ = i, (5.2) χ = ω + v. (5.3) Although they are fixed for the Keplerian orbit, the angles Ω, ω and M − nt vary in time for a real orbit. The inclination i remains constant, however. The distance from S to the centre of attraction O is given by (1.41), expressed in terms of the true anomaly v : a(1 − e2) r = . (5.4) 1+e cos v 1 The word ‘precession’, meaning ‘the action of preceding’, was coined by Coper- nicus around 1530 (præcessio in Latin) to speak about the precession of the equinoxes, i.e., the retrograde motion of the equinoctial points. This term was then taken up in mechanics to describe the corresponding Euler angle. In the motion of the satellite orbital plane, the word ‘precession’ clearly refers to a motion that may actually be prograde, as well as retrograde. 176 5 Orbit and Ground Track of a Satellite Figure 5.1. Precessional motion of the orbit in the frame . The orbital plane ro- tates about the polar axis, maintaining a fixed inclination relative to the equatorial plane (xOy). Its projection onto the equatorial plane can be used to measure Ω, the longitude of the ascending node, whose variation is given by Ω˙ . If the satellite has a prograde orbit (as here, where the ascending node has been indicated by a small black circle, the descending node by a small white circle and the latest ground trackbyadash-dotted curve), the precessional motion is retrograde, i.e., Ω<˙ 0 Since this distance is specified, the position of S is determined by composing the following three rotations, shown schematically in Fig. 5.2 and described below: • Precessional motion in E, taking the straight line Ox onto the straight line ON (= Ox1): =⇒ [P1] : Rotation through angle (Ox, Ox1)=ψ about Oz . • Rotation of E onto P about the line of nodes: =⇒ [P2] : Rotation through angle (Oz1, Oz2)=θ about Ox1 . • Motion in P which takes the straight line ON (= Ox1 = Ox2)ontothe straight line OS (or OX): =⇒ [P3] : Rotation through angle (Ox2, OX)=χ about Oz2 = OZ . It can be shown that any rotation of a solid can be decomposed into three elementary rotations about suitably chosen axes. In the case of the Euler angles, this decomposition is one-to-one with the following domains: 5.1 Position of the Satellite on its Orbit 177 Figure 5.2. The three rotations taking a given point on a sphere to another ar- bitrary point, using the three Euler angles. Black circles indicate the three axes of rotation: Oz = Oz1 for [P1], Ox1 = Ox2 for [P2], and Oz2 = OZ for [P3] ψ ∈ [0, 2π) ,θ∈ [0,π) χ ∈ [0, 2π) . The axes and angles of rotation are summarised here: P1 (Ox, Oy, Oz) −→ (Ox1, Oy1, Oz1 = Oz) , P2 (Ox1, Oy1, Oz1) −→ (Ox2 = Ox1, Oy2, Oz2) , P3 (Ox2, Oy2, Oz2) −→ (OX, OY , OZ = Oz2) . We then have the three rotation matrices: ⎛ ⎞ cos ψ − sin ψ 0 ⎝ ⎠ P1 = sin ψ cos ψ 0 , (5.5) 001 ⎛ ⎞ 10 0 ⎝ ⎠ P2 = 0cosθ − sin θ , (5.6) 0sinθ cos θ ⎛ ⎞ cos χ − sin χ 0 ⎝ ⎠ P3 = sin χ cos χ 0 . (5.7) 001 178 5 Orbit and Ground Track of a Satellite The matrix product of these three matrices gives the matrix P calculated below. We consider without loss of generality that N is on the axis Ox at the time origin. Its coordinates are thus (r, 0, 0). The coordinates of S(X, Y, Z) are obtained from those of N(x, y, z) via application of P : ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ X x r ⎝ Y ⎠ = P ⎝ y ⎠ = P ⎝ 0 ⎠ . Z z 0 We see that only the first column of the matrix P will be required for this calculation. We shall therefore calculate the matrix product P = P1P2P3 and write it in the form ⎛ ⎞ cos ψ cos χ − sin ψ sin χ cos θP12 P13 ⎝ ⎠ P = sin ψ cos χ +cosψ sin χ cos θP22 P23 , (5.8) sin χ sin θP32 P33 which gives ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ X cos ψ cos χ − sin ψ sin χ cos θ ⎝ Y ⎠ = r ⎝ sin ψ cos χ +cosψ sin χ cos θ ⎠ . (5.9) Z sin χ sin θ Using the orbital parameters given by (5.1)–(5.4), we obtain ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ X cos Ω cos(ω + v) − sin Ω sin(ω + v)cosi a(1 − e2) ⎝ Y ⎠ = ⎝ sin Ω cos(ω + v)+cosΩ sin(ω + v)cosi ⎠ . (5.10) 1+e cos v Z sin(ω + v)sini Consider a spherical coordinate system in the Galilean frame . The plane of reference is the equatorial plane xOy of the Earth, Oz is the polar axis and the position of Ox is fixed in space. The point S can be specified in by its spherical coordinates, the lon- gitude λ and the latitude φ, measured with the usual convention following from the right-handed trigonometric system. The longitude of Ox (position of N at the time origin) is denoted by λ0. Hence, ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ X cos φ cos(λ − λ0) ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ Y = r cos φ sin(λ − λ0) . (5.11) Z sin φ We thus obtain the position of S(λ, φ) as a function of time and the other orbital parameters via X, Y, Z : Z X φ =arcsin ,λ= λ + arccos , (5.12) r 0 r cos φ λ − λ0 from the sign of Y, λ− λ0 ∈ (−π, +π] . (5.13) If |φ| = π/2, λ is not determined (and its determination would be pointless). 5.2 Ground Track of Satellite in Circular Orbit 179 5.1.2 Equation for the Ground Track In many circumstances, one needs to know the position of the satellite relative to the Earth. One must therefore represent S in the frame T,whoseaxes in the equatorial frame rotate with the Earth. The transformation from this frame to the Galilean frame is obtained by a simple rotation about the polar axis Oz with angular speed (−Ω˙ T), since T rotates in with angular speed Ω˙ T. Bear in mind that these calculations are carried out in the Galilean frame , whilst the results may be expressed in the frame of our choice. Recalling the above definition of λ0, the equations of motion of S are the same in T as in , provided that we replace the value of ψ in (5.1) by ψ = λ0 +(Ω˙ − Ω˙ T)(t − tAN) , (5.14) where the time origin, the crossing time at the ascending node N, is written t = tAN. The satellite ground track is defined as the intersection of the straight line segment OS with the Earth’s surface. Its equation is thus obtained by replacing r by R in the above equations. (For this application, we may treat the Earth as a sphere of radius R.) 5.2 Ground Track of Satellite in Circular Orbit Near-circular orbits, which may be considered as circular in a first approxi- mation, constitute a very important and frequently encountered case. Let us now study some notions developed specifically for these orbits, such as the equatorial shift or the apparent inclination. The velocity of the satellite will be calculated in Sect. 5.5. 5.2.1 Equation for Satellite Ground Track When the orbit is circular, the motion is uniform with angular frequency n, the mean motion. Using the notation introduced above, the value of χ in (5.3) can be replaced by χ = n(t − tAN) . (5.15) We thus obtain the equation for the ground track, with (5.14), (5.2) and (5.15) substituted into (5.9) and (5.11), where r has been changed to R. In this case, the ground track of the satellite is determined by two quan- tities relating to the ascending node taken as origin, namely, its longitude λ0 and the crossing time tAN, which constitute the initial conditions of the uniform motion. 180 5 Orbit and Ground Track of a Satellite Sun-Synchronous Satellites For Sun-synchronous satellites, the angle ψ takes a specific value since Ω˙ = Ω˙ S. We have seen that the two angular frequencies characterising the Earth’s (annual and daily) motion are related by (4.24). Hence, according to (5.14), 2π ψ˙ = Ω˙ S − Ω˙ T = − . (5.16) JM Using the daily orbital frequency as given by (4.25), we obtain, for Sun- synchronous satellites, the very simple relation n ψ˙ = − . (5.17) ν We shall see the very important consequences of this relation in the following chapters, in particular, when studying the crossing time of the satellite and the question of recurrent orbits.
Recommended publications
  • The Early Explorers by Andrew J
    The Early Explorers by Andrew J. LePage August 8, 1999 Among these programs were the next generation of Introduction Explorer satellites the ABMA was planning. In the chaos that swept the United States after the launching of the first Soviet Sputniks, a variety of The First New Explorers satellite programs was sponsored by the Department The first of the new series of larger Explorer satellites of Defense (DoD) to supplement (and in some cases was the 39.7 kilogram (87.5 pound) satellite NASA supplant) the country's flagging "official" satellite designated as S-1. Built by JPL, the spin stabilized program, Vanguard. One of the stronger programs S-1 consisted of a pair of fiberglass cones joined at was sponsored by the ABMA (Army Ballistic Missile their bases with a diameter and height of 76 Agency) with its engineering team lead by the centimeters each. The scientific payload consisted of German rocket expert, Wernher von Braun. Using instruments to study cosmic rays, solar X-ray and the Juno I launch vehicle, the ABMA team launched ultraviolet emissions, micrometeorites, as well as the America's first satellite, Explorer 1, which was built globe's heat balance. This was all powered by a bank by Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) (see of 15 nickel-cadmium batteries recharged by 3,000 Explorer: America's First Satellite in the February solar cells mounted on the satellite's exterior. This 1998 issue of SpaceViews). advanced payload was equipped with a timer to turn itself off after a year in orbit. While these first satellites returned a wealth of new data, they were limited by the tiny 11 kilogram (25 Explorer S-1 was launched from Cape Canaveral on pound) payload capability of the Juno I.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Iowa Instruments in Space
    University of Iowa Instruments in Space A-D13-089-5 Wind Van Allen Probes Cluster Mercury Earth Venus Mars Express HaloSat MMS Geotail Mars Voyager 2 Neptune Uranus Juno Pluto Jupiter Saturn Voyager 1 Spaceflight instruments designed and built at the University of Iowa in the Department of Physics & Astronomy (1958-2019) Explorer 1 1958 Feb. 1 OGO 4 1967 July 28 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Launch Date Launch Date Launch Date Spacecraft Spacecraft Spacecraft Explorer 3 (U1T9)58 Mar. 26 Injun 5 1(U9T68) Aug. 8 (UT) ExpEloxrpelro r1e r 4 1915985 8F eJbu.l y1 26 OEGxOpl o4rer 41 (IMP-5) 19697 Juunlye 2 281 Juno * 2011 Aug. 5 Explorer 2 (launch failure) 1958 Mar. 5 OGO 5 1968 Mar. 4 Van Allen Probe A * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 3er 1 1915985 8M Oarc. t2. 611 InEjuxnp lo5rer 45 (SSS) 197618 NAouvg.. 186 Van Allen Probe B * 2012 Aug. 30 ExpPloiorenre 4er 2 1915985 8Ju Nlyo 2v.6 8 EUxpKlo 4r e(rA 4ri1el -(4IM) P-5) 197619 DJuenc.e 1 211 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 1 * 2015 Mar. 12 ExpPloiorenre 5e r 3 (launch failure) 1915985 8A uDge.c 2. 46 EPxpiolonreeerr 4130 (IMP- 6) 19721 Maarr.. 313 HMEaRgCnIe CtousbpeShaetr i(cF oMxu-1ltDis scaatelell itMe)i ssion / 2 * 2021081 J5a nM. a1r2. 12 PionPeioenr e1er 4 1915985 9O cMt.a 1r.1 3 EExpxlpolorerer r4 457 ( S(IMSSP)-7) 19721 SNeopvt.. 1263 HMaalogSnaett oCsupbhee Sriact eMlluitlet i*scale Mission / 3 * 2021081 M5a My a2r1. 12 Pioneer 2 1958 Nov. 8 UK 4 (Ariel-4) 1971 Dec. 11 Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission / 4 * 2015 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Summaries
    TIROS 8 12/21/63 Delta-22 TIROS-H (A-53) 17B S National Aeronautics and TIROS 9 1/22/65 Delta-28 TIROS-I (A-54) 17A S Space Administration TIROS Operational 2TIROS 10 7/1/65 Delta-32 OT-1 17B S John F. Kennedy Space Center 2ESSA 1 2/3/66 Delta-36 OT-3 (TOS) 17A S Information Summaries 2 2 ESSA 2 2/28/66 Delta-37 OT-2 (TOS) 17B S 2ESSA 3 10/2/66 2Delta-41 TOS-A 1SLC-2E S PMS 031 (KSC) OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories) Lunar and Planetary 2ESSA 4 1/26/67 2Delta-45 TOS-B 1SLC-2E S June 1999 OSO 1 3/7/62 Delta-8 OSO-A (S-16) 17A S 2ESSA 5 4/20/67 2Delta-48 TOS-C 1SLC-2E S OSO 2 2/3/65 Delta-29 OSO-B2 (S-17) 17B S Mission Launch Launch Payload Launch 2ESSA 6 11/10/67 2Delta-54 TOS-D 1SLC-2E S OSO 8/25/65 Delta-33 OSO-C 17B U Name Date Vehicle Code Pad Results 2ESSA 7 8/16/68 2Delta-58 TOS-E 1SLC-2E S OSO 3 3/8/67 Delta-46 OSO-E1 17A S 2ESSA 8 12/15/68 2Delta-62 TOS-F 1SLC-2E S OSO 4 10/18/67 Delta-53 OSO-D 17B S PIONEER (Lunar) 2ESSA 9 2/26/69 2Delta-67 TOS-G 17B S OSO 5 1/22/69 Delta-64 OSO-F 17B S Pioneer 1 10/11/58 Thor-Able-1 –– 17A U Major NASA 2 1 OSO 6/PAC 8/9/69 Delta-72 OSO-G/PAC 17A S Pioneer 2 11/8/58 Thor-Able-2 –– 17A U IMPROVED TIROS OPERATIONAL 2 1 OSO 7/TETR 3 9/29/71 Delta-85 OSO-H/TETR-D 17A S Pioneer 3 12/6/58 Juno II AM-11 –– 5 U 3ITOS 1/OSCAR 5 1/23/70 2Delta-76 1TIROS-M/OSCAR 1SLC-2W S 2 OSO 8 6/21/75 Delta-112 OSO-1 17B S Pioneer 4 3/3/59 Juno II AM-14 –– 5 S 3NOAA 1 12/11/70 2Delta-81 ITOS-A 1SLC-2W S Launches Pioneer 11/26/59 Atlas-Able-1 –– 14 U 3ITOS 10/21/71 2Delta-86 ITOS-B 1SLC-2E U OGO (Orbiting Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • Health of the U.S. Space Industrial Base and the Impact of Export Controls
    PRE -DECISIONAL - NOT FOR RELEASE Briefing of the Working Group on the Health of the U.S. Space Industrial Base and the Impact of Export Controls February 2008 1 PRE -DECISIONAL - NOT FOR RELEASE Preamble • “In order to increase knowledge, discovery, economic prosperity, and to enhance the national security, the United States must have robust, effective, and efficient space capabilities. ” - U.S. National Space Policy (August 31, 2006). 2 PRE -DECISIONAL - NOT FOR RELEASE Statement of Task • Empanel an expert study group to [1] review previous and ongoing studies on export controls and the U.S. space industrial base and [2] assess the health of the U.S. space industrial base and determine if there is any adverse impact from export controls, particularly on the lower -tier contractors. • The expert study group will review the results of the economic survey of the U.S. space industrial base conducted by the Department of Commerce and analyzed by the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL). • Integrate the findings of the study group with the result of the AFRL / Department of Commerce survey to arrive at overall conclusions and recommendations regarding the impact of export controls on the U.S. space industrial base. • Prepare a report and briefing of these findings 3 PRE -DECISIONAL - NOT FOR RELEASE Working Group 4 PRE -DECISIONAL - NOT FOR RELEASE Methodology • Leveraged broad set of interviews and data from: – US government • Department of State, Department of Defense (OSD/Policy, OSD/AT&L, DTSA, STRATCOM, General Council), NRO, Department
    [Show full text]
  • 23 Mar 2018 2018 Asiasat Reports 2017 Annual Results
    MEDIA RELEASE AsiaSat Reports 2017 Annual Results Hong Kong, 23 March 2018 - Asia Satellite Telecommunications Holdings Limited (‘AsiaSat’ – SEHK: 1135), Asia’s leading satellite operator, today announced financial results for the full- year ended 31 December 2017. Financial Highlights: 2017 revenue returned to an upward trend with an increase of 6% to HK$1,354 million from HK$1,272 million in 2016, supported by the lease of the full Ku-band payload of AsiaSat 8 during the year, on-going migration from Standard Definition to High Definition broadcasting and increased demand for data services 2017 profit attributable to owners was HK$397 million (2016: HK$430 million). On a like-for- like basis, after excluding a reversal of tax provision of HK$55 million in 2016, 2017 profit recorded an increase of 6%, HK$22 million compared to 2016 Proposed final dividend of HK$0.20 per share (2016: HK$0.20 per share). Together with the interim dividend of HK$0.18 per share (2016: Nil), the total dividend for the year 2017 is HK$0.38 per share (2016: HK$0.20 per share ) Operational Highlights: AsiaSat enters its 30th year in 2018 with an expanded and upgraded satellite fleet, including the new AsiaSat 9 which became fully operational in November 2017, bringing improved performance to customers and additional capacity to grow company business A lease for the full payload of AsiaSat 4 was secured following successful migration of customers from AsiaSat 4 to AsiaSat 9, the full revenue impact of which will be seen in 2018 Overall payload utilisation
    [Show full text]
  • Geocart 3 User's Manual
    User’s Manual Credits Application design & programming ........ Daniel “daan” Strebe & Paul J. Messmer. Manual design & authorship ................... Daniel “daan” Strebe, with Paul J. Messmer (Chapter 1, Appendices G&H.) Thanks to Tiffany M. Lillie, Sirus A Strebe, & Matthew Strebe for proofreading and many helpful comments. Dedicated to the memory of John Parr Snyder extraordinary researcher of and historian of map projections. He encouraged me. — daan Manual composed and edited using: • Adobe InDesign™ CS4 • Geocart™ • Adobe Photoshop™ • Adobe Illustrator™ This manual is typeset primarily in Adobe Garamond Pro with headings in Myriad Pro. Notices This manual describes Geocart 3.1. The maps you make with Geocart may be used however you see fit without license and without having to credit Geocart (though we would appreciate if you would when it is reasonable to do so). However, if you use geographic databases not supplied with Geocart, then you are responsible for properly licensing them. Some map projections included in Geocart were patented. Mapthematics LLC believes patents on all included projections have expired but accepts no responsibility for alleged infringement. Some corporations use logos similar in form to some map projections available in Geocart. The user of the Geocart software accepts sole responsibility for their use. The name Geocart is trademarked by Daniel R. Strebe in the United States of America. The Geocart software is copyrighted material belonging to Mapthematics LLC and Special Case Software LLC. You may not make copies of Geocart for other than backup purposes, and you may not lend or sell Geocart to another person or corporation unless you destroy all of your own copies before doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • 5–21 5.5 Miscellaneous Projections GMT Supports 6 Common
    GMT TECHNICAL REFERENCE & COOKBOOK 5–21 5.5 Miscellaneous Projections GMT supports 6 common projections for global presentation of data or models. These are the Hammer, Mollweide, Winkel Tripel, Robinson, Eckert VI, and Sinusoidal projections. Due to the small scale used for global maps these projections all use the spherical approximation rather than more elaborate elliptical formulae. 5.5.1 Hammer Projection (–Jh or –JH) The equal-area Hammer projection, first presented by Ernst von Hammer in 1892, is also known as Hammer-Aitoff (the Aitoff projection looks similar, but is not equal-area). The border is an ellipse, equator and central meridian are straight lines, while other parallels and meridians are complex curves. The projection is defined by selecting • The central meridian • Scale along equator in inch/degree or 1:xxxxx (–Jh), or map width (–JH) A view of the Pacific ocean using the Dateline as central meridian is accomplished by running the command pscoast -R0/360/-90/90 -JH180/5 -Bg30/g15 -Dc -A10000 -G0 -P -X0.1 -Y0.1 > hammer.ps 5.5.2 Mollweide Projection (–Jw or –JW) This pseudo-cylindrical, equal-area projection was developed by Mollweide in 1805. Parallels are unequally spaced straight lines with the meridians being equally spaced elliptical arcs. The scale is only true along latitudes 40˚ 44' north and south. The projection is used mainly for global maps showing data distributions. It is occasionally referenced under the name homalographic projection. Like the Hammer projection, outlined above, we need to specify only
    [Show full text]
  • Space Almanac 2007
    2007 Space Almanac The US military space operation in facts and figures. Compiled by Tamar A. Mehuron, Associate Editor, and the staff of Air Force Magazine 74 AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2007 Space 0.05g 60,000 miles Geosynchronous Earth Orbit 22,300 miles Hard vacuum 1,000 miles Medium Earth Orbit begins 300 miles 0.95g 100 miles Low Earth Orbit begins 60 miles Astronaut wings awarded 50 miles Limit for ramjet engines 28 miles Limit for turbojet engines 20 miles Stratosphere begins 10 miles Illustration not to scale Artist’s conception by Erik Simonsen AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2007 75 US Military Missions in Space Space Support Space Force Enhancement Space Control Space Force Application Launch of satellites and other Provide satellite communica- Ensure freedom of action in space Provide capabilities for the ap- high-value payloads into space tions, navigation, weather infor- for the US and its allies and, plication of combat operations and operation of those satellites mation, missile warning, com- when directed, deny an adversary in, through, and from space to through a worldwide network of mand and control, and intel- freedom of action in space. influence the course and outcome ground stations. ligence to the warfighter. of conflict. US Space Funding Millions of constant Fiscal 2007 dollars 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Fiscal Year 59 62 65 68 71 74 77 80 83 86 89 92 95 98 01 04 Fiscal Year NASA DOD Other Total Fiscal Year NASA DOD Other Total 1959 1,841 3,457 240 5,538 1983 13,051 18,601 675 32,327 1960 3,205 3,892
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Dictionary of Air Intelligence
    Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Jon Woronoff, Series Editor 1. British Intelligence, by Nigel West, 2005. 2. United States Intelligence, by Michael A. Turner, 2006. 3. Israeli Intelligence, by Ephraim Kahana, 2006. 4. International Intelligence, by Nigel West, 2006. 5. Russian and Soviet Intelligence, by Robert W. Pringle, 2006. 6. Cold War Counterintelligence, by Nigel West, 2007. 7. World War II Intelligence, by Nigel West, 2008. 8. Sexspionage, by Nigel West, 2009. 9. Air Intelligence, by Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey, 2009. Historical Dictionary of Air Intelligence Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, No. 9 The Scarecrow Press, Inc. Lanham, Maryland • Toronto • Plymouth, UK 2009 SCARECROW PRESS, INC. Published in the United States of America by Scarecrow Press, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 www.scarecrowpress.com Estover Road Plymouth PL6 7PY United Kingdom Copyright © 2009 by Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Trenear-Harvey, Glenmore S., 1940– Historical dictionary of air intelligence / Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey. p. cm. — (Historical dictionaries of intelligence and counterintelligence ; no. 9) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978-0-8108-5982-1 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8108-5982-3 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-8108-6294-4 (eBook) ISBN-10: 0-8108-6294-8 (eBook) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Launch Report
    Commercial Space Transportation QUARTERLY LAUNCH REPORT Featuring the launch results from the previous quarter and forecasts for the next two quarters. 1st Quarter 1997 U n i t e d S t a t e s D e p a r t me n t o f T r a n sp o r t a t i o n • F e d e r a l A v i a t io n A d m in i st r a t i o n A s so c i a t e A d mi n is t r a t o r f o r C o mm e r c ia l S p a c e T r a n s p o r t a t io n QUARTERLY LAUNCH R EPORT 1 1ST QUARTER 1997 R EPORT Objectives This report summarizes recent and scheduled worldwide commercial, civil, and military orbital space launch events. Scheduled launches listed in this report are vehicle/payload combinations that have been identified in open sources, including industry references, company manifests, periodicals, and government documents. Note that such dates are subject to change. This report highlights commercial launch activities, classifying commercial launches as one or more of the following: • Internationally competed launch events (i.e., launch opportunities considered available in principle to competitors in the international launch services market), • Any launches licensed by the Office of the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation of the Federal Aviation Administration under U.S. Code Title 49, Section 701, Subsection 9 (previously known as the Commercial Space Launch Act), and • Certain European launches of post, telegraph and telecommunications payloads on Ariane vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Asia-Pacific
    Worldwide Satellite Magazine June 2008 SatMagazine Spotlight On Asia-Pacific * The Asia-Pacific Satellite Market Segment * Expert analysis: Tara Giunta, Chris Forrester, Futron, Euroconsult, NSR and more... * Satellite Imagery — The Second Look * Diving Into the Beijing Olympics * Executive Spotlight, Andrew Jordan * The Pros Speak — Mark Dankburg, Bob Potter, Adrian Ballintine... * Checking Out CommunicAsia + O&GC3 * Thuraya-3 In Focus SATMAGAZINE JUNE 2008 CONTENTS COVER FEATURE EXE C UTIVE SPOTLIGHT The Asia-Pacific Satellite Market Andrew Jordan by Hartley & Pattie Lesser President & CEO The opportunities, and challenges, SAT-GE facing the Asia-Pacific satellite market 12 are enormous 42 FEATURES INSIGHT Let The Games Begin... High Stakes Patent Litigation by Silvano Payne, Hartley & Pattie by Tara Giunta, Robert M. Masters, Lesser, and Kevin and Michael Fleck and Erin Sears The Beijing Olympic Games are ex- Like it or not, high stakes patent pected to find some 800,000 visitors wars are waging in the global satel- 47 arriving in town for the 17-day event. 04 lite sector, and it is safe to assume that they are here to stay. Transforming Satel- TBS: Looking At Further Diversification lite Broadband by Chris Forrester by Mark Dankberg Internationally, Turner Broadcasting The first time the “radical” concept has always walked hand-in-hand with 54 of a 100 Gbps satellite was intro- the growth of satellite and cable – duced was four years ago, 07 and now IPTV. Here’s Looking At Everything — Part II by Hartley & Pattie Lesser The Key To DTH Success In Asia by Jose del Rosario The Geostationary Operational Envi- Some are eyeing Asia as a haven for ronmental Satellites (GOES) continu- economic safety or even economic ously track evolution of weather over growth amidst the current global almost a hemisphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Asiasat and Globecast Distribute DW's New HD Channel on Asiasat 7
    AsiaSat and Globecast distribute DW's New HD Channel on AsiaSat 7 Asia's leading satellite operator Asia Satellite Telecommunications Company Limited (AsiaSat) has reached an agreement with Globecast to deliver Deutsche Welle’s English-language program in HD to the Asia-Pacific region. DW in HD is an additional offering next to the existing TV channel in SD and radio services on AsiaSat 7. DW’s German-language program will continue its service across Asia via AsiaSat 5. For the past 20 years, AsiaSat and DW have partnered to bring German information and culture to Asia. The enhanced service offering demonstrates their commitment to providing more high-quality and relevant content to Asia. The AsiaSat fleet’s comprehensive access to Asian TV viewers has enabled DW to upgrade viewing experience as well as harness audience with different language interests. Sabrina Cubbon, AsiaSat's VP Marketing & Global Accounts: "I’m very pleased to extend our offerings of DW's programs through the Globecast partnership. Both are long-term clients of AsiaSat. Moving to HD will definitely improve viewer satisfaction and is a key tool to strengthen our success in a competitive market!" "For DW, 2017 will be a year of not only expansion but solidification as well," said DW's Director of Distribution and Sales Petra Schneider. "Content, brand and technological improvement will be more dynamic than ever before – the ability to constantly engage your audience in a consistent way and adapting to their technological watching habits remain our most important goals. The move towards HD is a step in the right direction." Biliana Pumpalovic, managing director at Globecast: "We are working in multiple markets to help broadcasters launch HD services and we're very pleased that DW has turned to us and AsiaSat.
    [Show full text]