DOCSLIB.ORG

Four Mile Creek

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Stream Name Site Name Site/Map Capacity Capacity Ave. Annual Number (kW) Factor Energy (GWh) Region 1 – Lake Erie 1 Conestoga River Conestoga Dam 2GA74 1370 69% 8.221 2 Trout Creek Wildwood Dam 2GD14 220 68% 1.316 3 Eramosa Creek Everton (C.A. Dam) 2GA62 113 53% 0.525 4 Thames River Springbank Dam 2GE1 1077 57% 5.406 5 Grand River Brantford (Lorne St. City Dam) 2GB20 1265 53% 5.883 6 Grand River Caledonia (C.A. Dam) 2GB3 1395 65% 7.943 7 Grand River Penman’s Dam 2GA40 934 65% 5.285 8 Conestoga River St. Jacobs Dam 2GA26 428 69% 2.568 9 Grand River Parkhill Dam 2GA35 864 65% 4.889 10 Grand River Fergus (Wilson Mill Dam) 2GA13 385 53% 1.791 11 Grand River Fergus (General Steel Wares) 2GA1 125 53% 0.581 12 Grand River Bissel Dam 2GA58 258 67% 1.505 13 Grand River Wilkes Dam 2GB9 2079 65% 11.874 14 Nith River New Hamburg 2GA22 174 56% .854 15 Speed River Wellington (C.A. Dam) 2GA77 100 66% .578 16 Grand River Dunnville (C.A. Dam) 2GB5 432 53% 2.009 17 Irving Creek Salem 2GA27 100 45% .393 18 Big Otter Creek Tillsonburg 2GC16 231 53% 1.075 19 Grand River 3.2 km below Brantford 2GB10 3,373 53% 15.689 20 Ninth River Paris 2GA42 440 45% 1.734 21 Lynn River 8 km east of Simcoe 2GC33 101 53% .470 22 Ninth River .8 km above Ayr 2GA7 320 45% 1.260 23 Big Creek 5.6 km southwest of Delhi 2GC2 152 53% .708 24 Conestoga River 3.2 km below St. Jacobs 2GA12 311 53% 1.449 25 Conestoga River Hawkesville 2GA17 241 53% 1.122 26 Speed River Hespeler 2GA23 204 53% .947 27 Ninth River Wolverton 2GA36 268 45% 1.055 28 Lynn River Port Dover (Misner) 2GC18 161 53% .748 29 Sydenham River Florence 2GG1 213 45% .840 30 Thames River Byron 2GE2 359 53% 1.672 31 North Thames River St. Marys 2GD7 161 53% .748 32 Ninth River Canning 2GA14 204 45% .804 33 Speed River Preston 2GA8 147 53% .685 34 Speed River Hespeler (Silknit Ltd.) 2GA30 137 53% .637 35 Big Otter Creek Vienna 2GC13 156 53% .724 36 Speed River 1.6 km above Preston 2GA32 120 53% .557 37 Crowe River Cordova Lake Dam 2HK21 1,405 65% 8.000 38 Trent River Dam 1 960 99% 8.360 39 Kennisis River Big Hawk Lake Dam 2HF33 932 47% 3.837 40 Credit River Cataract Junction 2HB1 310 74% 2.006 41 Gooderham Creek Gooderham Lake Dam 2HF21 102 47% .421 42 Kennisis River Halls Lake Dam 2HF34 470 80% 3.294 43 Loughborough Lake Battersea Dam 2MA23 249 47% 1.025 44 Kennisis River Nunikani Lake Dam 2HF32 535 47% 2.201 45 Napanee River Springside Dam 440 70% 2.700 Stream Name Site Name Site/Map Capacity Capacity Ave. Annual Number (kW) Factor Energy (GWh) Region 2 – Lake Ontario 46 Kushog River Buck Slides Dam and Falls 2HF37 334 47% 1.375 47 Redstone River West Redstone Lake Dam 2HF47 438 47% 1.804 48 Devil Lake Bedford Mills Dam 2MA15 151 47% .622 49 Gull River Horseshoe Lake Dam 2HF26 2,462 63% 13.589 50 Credit River Huttonville 2HB60 300 61% 1.616 51 Gull River Norland 2HF1 778 54% 3.679 52 St. Lawrence/Cornwall Old Powerhouse 2NC2A 235 81% 1.667 53 Trent Canal System Trenton Lock 1, Dam 1 2HK17 6,047 63% 33.372 54 North River Round Lake Dam 2HK32 149 47% 0.612 55 Moira River Latta Dam 2HL14 568 54% 2.685 56 Twelve Mile Creek 2HA13 7,000 88% 53.962 57 Burnt River Kinmount Dam 2HF5 445 69% 2.690 58 Crowe River Marmora 2HK1 355 59% 1.835 59 Trent Canal System Fenelon Falls, Locks 33 & 3__ 2HH16 2,186 73% 13.979 60 Trent Canal System Burleigh Falls Dam, Lock 2__ 2HH2 1,800 63% 9.934 61 East Redstone River East Redstone Lake Dam 2HF29 206 47% .850 62 Trent Canal System Lock 24 2HJ7 440 90% 3.469 63 Welland Canal Lake Gibson 5,000 85% 37.200 64 Welland Canal Thorold 2HA11 4,350 53% 20.234 65 Kennisis River Kennisis Lake Dam 2HF30 106 47% 0.437 66 Gull River Gull Lake Dam 2HF27 521 54% 2.463 67 Moira River Lost Channel 2HL12 318 43% 1.198 68 Old Welland Canal Lake Gibson 5,000 45% 19.608 69 Trent Canal System Hastings Lock 18 2HK3 105 90% 0.828 70 Moira River Chisolm Dam 2HL13 366 54% 1.732 71 St. Lawrence/Cornwall Lock 18 2NC02C 135 85% 1.005 72 Trent Canal System Lock 4, Dam 4, below Frankford 2HK5 1,950 83% 14.178 73 Napanee River 1.6 km above Yarker 2HM8 126 54% 0.596 74 Gull River Coboconk 2HF3 447 54% 2.113 75 Moira River Belleville (Lott Dam) 2HL6 332 63% 1.831 76 Trent Canal System Glen Ross Lock 7, Dam 7 2HK2 3,395 63% 18.735 77 Credit River Georgetown Paper Mill 2HB5 174 53% 0.810 78 Credit River Georgetown Dam 2HB27 157 53% 0.732 79 Gull River Eagle Lake Dam 2HF24 188 54% 0.890 80 Gull River Twelve Mile Lake Dam 2HF25 294 54% 1.390 81 Credit River Erindale 2HB10 987 53% 4.593 82 Moira River Corbyville Dam 2HL16 229 63% 1.266 83 Trent Canal Kirkfield Lift Lock 36 2A214 116 54% 0.549 84 Rouge River Lot 8, Con. IV, Twp. Scaborough 2HC12 99 53% 0.462 85 Crowe River Town Line 2HK22 1,438 54% 6.801 86 Skootamatta River Above Actinolite 2HL2 716 47% 2.948 87 Gananoque River Marble Rock Dam 2MA9 145 47% 0.597 88 Skootamatta River High Falls 2HL1 515 47% 2.121 89 Crowe River Belmont Lake Dam 2HK43 160 54% 0.755 90 Irondale River Devils Gap 2HF16 664 47% 2.733 Stream Name Site Name Site/Map Capacity Capacity Ave. Annual Number (kW) Factor Energy (GWh) 91 Partridge Creek North Brook 2HL22 446 47% 1.835 92 Napanee River Napanee 2HM24 633 54% 2.995 93 Sixteen Mile Creek Oakville 2HB26 111 45% 0.438 94 Skootamatta River Near Actinolite 2HL3 544 47% 2.241 95 Crowe River 1st Falls above Cordova Lake 2HK21A 535 45% 2.098 96 Spencer Creek Dundas 2HB40 227 45% 0.894 97 Lyn Creek Lyn 2MB1 183 53% 0.852 98 North River 24 km above Marmora 2HK44 118 47% 0.485 99 West Duffin Cr. Pickering 2HC4 252 53% 1.170 100 Burnt River Three Brothers Falls 2HF18 2,140 54% 10.122 101 Crowe River 2nd Falls above Cordova Lake 2HK21B 500 45% 1.961 102 Salmon Lake Sharps Corners 2HM34 336 54% 1.589 103 Otonabee River Old Powerhouse 800 80% 5.600 104 Credit River .8 km below Georgetown 2HB6 332 53% 1.544 105 Napanee River 1.6 km below Colebrook 2HM3 309 54% 1.462 106 Skootamatta River Flinton 2HL9 243 47% 1.001 107 Credit River 1.6 km below Streetsville 2HB9 368 53% 1.711 108 Trent Canal System Young’s Point, Lock 27 2HJ6 1,360 63% 7.508 109 Spencer Creek 3.2 km above Dundas 2HB38 159 45% 0.626 110 Napanee River .8 km below Camden East 2HM5 270 54% 1.279 111 Moira River Cannifton 2HL17 514 63% 2.839 112 Crowe River Rylstone Lot 25, Con. XII, Twp. 2HK35 561 54% 2.654 113 Moira River Plainfield 2HL15 497 54% 2.352 114 Beaver Creek 6.4 km above Marmora 2HK13 224 47% 0.922 115 Rideau Canal System Chaffeys Locks 2MA7 106 54% 0.501 116 Credit River Inglewood 2HB2 111 53% 0.517 117 Credit River Streetsville 2HB17 224 53% 1.043 118 Moira River Belleville (Seasonal Weir) 2HL7 378 63% 2.088 119 Trent Canal System Bobcaygeon Lock 32 2HH17 635 63% 3.504 120 Napanee River Newburgh 2HM14 213 54% 1.009 121 Trent Canal System Lock 22 2HJ3 2,676 63% 14.766 122 Credit River Streetsville 2HB21 205 53% 0.955 123 Credit River 0.4 km below Streetsville 2HB18 205 53% 0.955 124 Moira River .8 km above Belleville 2HL4 250 69% 1.501 125 Salmon Lake Croydon 2HM6 111 54% 0.524 126 Trent Canal System Lock 23 2HJ14 2,292 63% 12.649 127 Credit River Boston Mills 2HB52 135 53% 0.629 128 Trent Canal System Deer Bay 2HH20 630 63% 3.475 129 Napanee River Camden East 2HM4 121 54% 0.572 130 Credit River Meadowville 2HB12 173 53% 0.804 131 Ganaraska River Port Hope 2HD15 125 53% 0.581 132 Salmon Lake Roblin 2HM31 102 54% 0.485 133 Napanee River Strathcona 2HM15 126 54% 0.596 134 Rideau Canal System Davis Locks 2MA4 151 54% 0.715 135 Salmon Lake Forest Mills 2HM30 107 54% 0.508 136 Ganaraska River Port Hope 2HD14 120 53% 0.557 Stream Name Site Name Site/Map Capacity Capacity Ave. Annual Number (kW) Factor Energy (GWh) 137 Moira River Belleville (Ice Control) 2HL5 284 63% 1.566 138 Scugog River Lindsay 2HG5 220 47% 0.906 139 Salmon Lake 0.4 km below Tamworth 2HM16 123 54% 0.580 140 Salmon Lake Tamworth 2HM13 123 54% 0.580 141 Salmon Lake Milltown 2HM36 165 54% 0.779 142 Trent Canal System Buckhorn Lock 31 2HH1 1,671 63% 9.224 143 Salmon Lake 6.4 km above Tamworth 2HM12 114 54% 0.540 144 Trent Canal System Lock 25 2HJ1 1,888 63% 10.418 145 Credit River Glen Williams 2HB20 130 53% 0.605 146 Credit River .8 km from Cheltenham 2HB3 122 53% 0.565 147 Credit River Cheltenham 2HB4 122 53% 0.565 148 Irondale River Furnace Falls 2HF46 160 47% 0.659 149 Credit River Churchville 2HB30 132 53% 0.613 150 Salmon Lake Lonsdale 2HM17 129 54% 0.612 151 Salmon River Shannonville 2HM35 144 54% 0.683 152 Trent Canal System Rosedale Lock 35 2HF7 245 63% 1.353 153 Trent Canal System Lock 19 2HJ21 1,579 63% 8.717 Region 3 – Southern Lake Huron 154 Loon River Gooseneck Lake Dam 2EA34 116 47% 0.477 155 Pine River 4.8 km below Horning Mills 2ED23 214 45% 0.843 156 Trent-Severn Waterway Couchiching Lock 42 2EC42 1,392 76% 9.267 157 Six Mile Lake Whites Portage Dam 2A219 1,048 47% 4.299 158 Muskoka Musquash Go Home Lake Dam 2EB12 8,108 63% 44.748 159 Magnetawan River Ahmic Lake Dam 2EA26 970 65% 5.536 160 Magnetawan/Shadow Riv Feighens Dam 2EA26A 750 70% 4.599 161 Saugeen River Denny’s Dam 2FC28 1,160 61% 6.199 162 Magnetawan River Magnetawan Dam 2EA30 770 65% 4.384 163 South Magnetawan American Trail Dam 2EA35 170 47% 0.699 164 Anson Creek Trout Lake Dam 2EC20 110 47% 0.453 165 Sydenham River Waterworks Dam 2FB29 102 45% 0.403 166 South Maitland Londesborough Dam 2FE15 116 45% 0.456 167 Talbot River Talbot Dam – Lock 39 2A217 133 45% 0.521 168 Severn River Washago Dams 2EC21 580 63% 3.203 169 Maitland River Wroxeter Dam 2FE8 110 53% 0.509 170 South Muskoka River Baysville Dam 2EB31 550 65% 3.119 171 Muskoka Musquash Bala Dam G.S.
Recommended publications
  • Engelmann's Quillwort (Isoetes Engelmannii) in Ontario

    Engelmann's Quillwort (Isoetes Engelmannii) in Ontario

    Engelmann’s Quillwort (Isoetes Engelmannii) in Ontario Ontario Recovery Strategy Series Recovery strategy prepared under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 February 2010 Ministry of Natural Resources About the Ontario Recovery Strategy Series This series presents the collection of recovery strategies that are prepared or adopted as advice to the Province of Ontario on the recommended approach to recover species at risk. The Province ensures the preparation of recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA, 2007) and the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada. What is recovery? What’s next? Recovery of species at risk is the process by which the Nine months after the completion of a recovery strategy decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated a government response statement will be published species is arrested or reversed, and threats are which summarizes the actions that the Government of removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of a Ontario intends to take in response to the strategy. The species’ persistence in the wild. implementation of recovery strategies depends on the continued cooperation and actions of government agencies, individuals, communities, land users, and What is a recovery strategy? conservationists. Under the ESA, 2007, a recovery strategy provides the best available scientific knowledge onwhat is required For more information to achieve recovery of a species. A recovery strategy outlines the habitat needs and the threats to the To learn more about species at risk recovery in Ontario, survival and recovery of the species. It also makes please visit the Ministry of Natural Resources Species at recommendations on the objectives for protection and Risk webpage at: www.ontario.ca/speciesatrisk recovery, the approaches to achieve those objectives, and the area that should be considered in the development of a habitat regulation.
  • Characterizing the Flow Regime in Brook Trout (Salvelinus Fontinalis) Incubation Habitats and the Implications for Management in a Hydro-Regulated River

    Characterizing the Flow Regime in Brook Trout (Salvelinus Fontinalis) Incubation Habitats and the Implications for Management in a Hydro-Regulated River

    Characterizing the flow regime in Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) incubation habitats and the implications for management in a hydro-regulated river by Stephen Slongo A Master’s thesis presented in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Forestry Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University Thunder Bay, Ontario January 2018 1 Abstract Hydropower accounts for more than one third of Ontario Power Generation’s electrical production. Hydroelectric development often occurs on rivers that also support recreational fisheries. The construction and operation of dams, diversions and generating facilities unavoidably influence the ecological function of rivers. The Aguasabon River is a northern Canadian Shield river with major developments for water diversion, storage, and power generation. This river offers opportunity to examine the importance of vertical flows through the substrate at a Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) spawning area. The vertical and horizontal hydraulic gradients and subsequent water temperature changes are the subject of this study. Piezometers were used to monitor the river and subsurface water levels near Brook Trout redds during the spawning and incubation period under normal and increasing discharge conditions. The Brook Trout spawning area in the Aguasabon River experienced upwelling conditions for the entire monitoring period (Oct 28th, 2016 – Jan 13th, 2017) before water release at the Long Lake Control Dam (LLCD). Hyporheic temperatures declined gradually, remaining >3.7 °C. The river temperature in the winter before water release was 1.5 °C. Rapid increase in water level after discharge from above the LLCD resulted in the reversal of flow in the hyporheic zone.
  • C-Band Public Benefit Keewaytinook Okimakanak: a Case Study

    C-Band Public Benefit Keewaytinook Okimakanak: a Case Study

    C-Band Public Benefit Keewaytinook Okimakanak: A Case Study Summative Overview Assisting Remote Communities Across Canada to Access & Use C-Band Public Benefit By Keewaytinook Okimakanak Research Institute Draft Report - March 28, 2005 Page 1 C-Band Public Benefit Keewaytinook Okimakanak Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 Pre-Deployment Activities 3 Inputs 3.1 Bandwidth Allocated 3.2 Marketing the Benefit and Developing Stakeholders 3.2.1 An Open Invitation to Collaborate 3.2.2 Continued Marketing and Stakeholder Development 3.2.3 Coordination with Telesat Canada and Industry Canada 3.2.4 Residential Internet and Public Benefit Discussions 3.3 MHz Allocated per Recipient 3.4 Financial Investments by Stakeholders 3.5 Organizational Development: Training and Staffing 3.5.1 Service Providers 3.5.2 User Organizations, Northern Ontario 3.5.3 Service Providers 4 Activities 4.1 Current Services/Applications Enhanced 4.2 New Services 5 Outputs 5.1 Traffic Reports 5.2 Application Statistics 6 Outcomes 6.1 Passionate Adoption of ICT applications 6.2 Outcomes Identified by Users in Satellite-Served Communities 6.3 Outcomes: Stakeholder Organizations 6.4 Economic Outcomes / Cost Avoidance / Savings 6.5 Social Enterprise 6.6 Employment Opportunities Created 6.7 Outcomes Recognized by Five Communities in Ontario’s far north 6.7.1 Fort Severn: Supporting Local Economic and Social Development On- line 6.7.2 Slate Falls: The power of partnerships: “We’re not remote anymore” 6.7.3 Weagamow: Making education opportunities available in
  • Analysis and Interpretation of Regional Geophysical Data in the Kapuskasing Structural Zone of the Superior Province, Canada

    Analysis and Interpretation of Regional Geophysical Data in the Kapuskasing Structural Zone of the Superior Province, Canada

    Facultad de Ciencias Departamento de Geociencias Thesis for the degree of Bachelor in geosciences Analysis and Interpretation of Regional Geophysical Data in the Kapuskasing Structural Zone of the Superior Province, Canada Author: SHARON VANESSA CUERVO ARCINIEGAS Research mentor and advisor: PH.D. BOGDAN NITESCU Bogotá, Colombia December 2020 Acknowledgements At first, I want to thank Bogdan Nitescu, my research mentor and advisor, for suggesting me the topic of this thesis and for its great knowledge on the subject. Also, I am grateful for his support and for helping me with all my doubts and concerns during the process of this project. To the Geoscience Department and its excellent teachers, thanks to which I have knowledge and love for geosciences, I would like to thank for supplying me with the necessary Software and materials for the data processing and analysis. My most loving and sincere thanks to my parents, Luz Janneth and Fernando, for loving me and who always supported me and guided me to be the person I am today. To my brother Santiago and my cousin Diany thanks for encouraging me and listen to me when I needed the most. Also, I want to Thank Theo for making me smile and cheer me up. To my uncle Jaime and my beautiful grandma, who believed in me during all my academical process, thank you very much. Finally, I want to thank my friends and colleagues for their support and help in my personal and professional life. Agradecimientos En primer lugar, quiero agradecer a Bogdan Nitescu, mi mentor y asesor de investigación, por sugerirme el tema de esta tesis y por su gran conocimiento.
  • Flood Plain Mapping Study Burnt River

    Flood Plain Mapping Study Burnt River

    Flood Plain Mapping Study Burnt River Final Report May 2019 Executive Summary The primary goals of this study are to create hydrologic and hydraulic models of the watershed and produce flood plain mapping for Burnt River from the outlet to Cameron Lake to the hamlet of Burnt River. The mapping will allow the City of Kawartha Lakes and Kawartha Conservation staff to make informed decisions about future land use and identify flood hazard reduction opportunities. The Burnt River Flood Plain Mapping Study was subject to a comprehensive peer review for core components: data collection, data processing, hydrologic modeling, hydraulic modeling, and map generation. The process was supported throughout by a Technical Committee consisting of technical/managerial staff from Ganaraska Conservation, the City of Kawartha Lakes, and Kawartha Conservation. Topics discussed in this study include: • Previous studies in the area • Collection of LiDAR, bathymetry and orthophoto data • Proposed land use • Delineation of hydrology subcatchments • Creation of a Visual OTTHYMO hydrology model for Regional (Timmins) Storm • Calculation of subcatchment hydrology model parameters • Derivation of flow peaks at key nodes along the watercourse • Flood Frequency Analysis for the 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year events • Creation of a HEC-RAS hydraulic model • Creation of flood plain maps Key elements of this study include: • The Timmins storm is the Regulatory Event for the watercourse • Flood plain maps are to be created based on the highest flood elevation of the calculated water surface elevations Key recommendations of this study: • The maps created from the results of the HEC-RAS model for Burnt River Creek should be endorsed by the Kawartha Conservation Board.
  • Population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior

    Population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264864682 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior Article in Journal of Applied Ichthyology · August 2014 DOI: 10.1111/jai.12566 CITATIONS READS 0 33 5 authors, including: Thomas C. Pratt Jennie Pearce Fisheries and Oceans Canada Pearce & Associates Ecological Research 49 PUBLICATIONS 489 CITATIONS 42 PUBLICATIONS 3,610 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Thomas C. Pratt on 08 April 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Journal of Applied Ichthyology J. Appl. Ichthyol. (2014), 1–7 Received: December 6, 2013 © 2014 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Accepted: February 24, 2014 Journal of Applied Ichthyology © 2014 Blackwell Verlag GmbH doi: 10.1111/jai.12566 ISSN 0175–8659 Identification of a robust Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) population in Goulais Bay, Lake Superior By T. C. Pratt1, W. M. Gardner1, J. Pearce2, S. Greenwood3 and S. C. Chong3 1Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 2Pearce & Associates Ecological Research, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada; 3Upper Great Lakes Management Unit, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada Summary anthropogenic activities due to specific life history character- Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens Rafinesque, 1917) in istics, including slow growth and late maturation, intermit- Lake Superior are greatly depressed from their historic abun- tent spawning intervals, and habitat requirements such as dance, and few populations meet the rehabilitation goals specific temperature, flow velocities and substrate require- identified by management agencies.
  • An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario

    An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario

    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ONTARIO AREAS DRAINING INTO HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND UPPER OTTAWA RIVER BY S. N. SINGER AND C. K. CHENG ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2002 KK PREFACE This report provides a regional assessment of the groundwater resources of areas draining into Hudson Bay, James Bay, and the Upper Ottawa River in northern Ontario in terms of the geologic conditions under which the groundwater flow systems operate. A hydrologic budget approach was used to assess precipitation, streamflow, baseflow, and potential and actual evapotranspiration in seven major basins in the study area on a monthly, annual and long-term basis. The report is intended to provide basic information that can be used for the wise management of the groundwater resources in the study area. Toronto, July 2002. DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. KKK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 7 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES 7 2.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 8 2.4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 8 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 9 2.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 3.
  • Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Springpole Gold Project, Ontario, Canada

    Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Springpole Gold Project, Ontario, Canada

    Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Springpole Gold Project, Ontario, Canada Report Prepared for Report Prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. 2CG026.000 Effective Date: March 25, 2013 Amended: October 7, 2016 2CG026.000 – Gold Canyon Resources Inc. Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Springpole Gold Project, Canada Page i Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Springpole Gold Project, Ontario, Canada Prepared for: Prepared by: Gold Canyon Resources Inc. SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. Suite 810–609 Granville Street 2200–1066 West Hastings Street P.O. Box 10356, Pacific Centre Vancouver, BC V6E 3X2 Vancouver, BC V7Y 1G5 Canada Canada Tel: +1 604 682 3234 Tel: +1 604 681 4196 Tel 2: +1 888 242 3234 Web: www.srk.com Fax: +1 604 682 0537 Web: www.goldcanyon.ca Email: [email protected] SRK Project Number: 2CG026.000 Effective date: March 25, 2013 Signature date: October 7, 2016 Authored by: Dr. Gilles Arseneau, PGeo Bruce Murphy, FSAIMM Associate Consultant (Geology) Principal Consultant (Geotechnical) Dr. Adrian Dance, PEng Michael Royle, PGeo Principal Consultant (Metallurgy) Principal Consultant (Hydrogeology) John Duncan, PEng Dr. Maritz Rykaart, PEng Principal Consultant (Water Resources Principal Consultant (Geotechnical Engineering) Engineering) Chris Elliott, FAusIMM Dino Pilotto, PEng Principal Consultant (Mining) Principal Consultant (Mining) Mark Liskowich, PGeo Principal Consultant (Environmental) Peer Reviewed by: Neil Winkelmann, FAusIMM Principal Consultant (Mining) Acknowledgement: SRK would like to acknowledge the support and collaboration provided by Gold Canyon personnel. Their collaboration was greatly appreciated and instrumental to the success of this report. Cover: Springpole camp March 2013 (source: The Northern Sun News) AD/NW 2CG026 000_Springpole_PEA_TechnicalReport_20161014_FNL October 7, 2016 2CG026.000 – Gold Canyon Resources Inc.
  • Salerno Lake Sentinel 2017 Spring / Summer Edition June 2017

    Salerno Lake Sentinel 2017 Spring / Summer Edition June 2017

    SALERNO LAKE SENTINEL 2017 SPRING / SUMMER EDITION JUNE 2017 It’s about family, friends, community, relaxation, fun! Greetings After the winter of our discontent, of divisive politics, of deep ice encrusted snow and bitter cold, followed by a spring of endless rains and almost biblical plagues of mosquitoes and black-flies, we are now brightening our outlook. Summer is coming! The cottage roads are open again. Life is good. Welcome back to Salerno Lake (if you ever left….) Take a look at our SDLCA Events Calendar for this summer and mark the dates. There’s much to look forward to and it is our hope that you will participate. We have a terrific community here on Salerno Lake and you are an important part of it. The annual Canada Day Fireworks will be held this year on - gasp - Saturday July 1st, the actual Canada Day. That hap- pens only once every seven years… On July the 8th we have our very first Dock Sale AND our 7th Concert On The Lake at 6:30 PM featuring Kiyomi Valentine (McCloskey) a talented young woman who has a deep family connection to Salerno Lake. (Her sister Chloe was married here just last summer!) It’s also the summer of our 50th Annual Canoe Race, an incredible milestone in a long, storied tradition. And we will be holding the 2nd edition of the Youth Race for those 6-12 years of age. These events will be held on Sunday August 6th. The route of the Canoe Race is still to be determined due to the large log jam on the Irondale River.
  • Geology of Foleyet and Ivanhoe Townships; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5851, 42P

    Geology of Foleyet and Ivanhoe Townships; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5851, 42P

    ISBN 0-7778-1337-8 THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
  • FRESHWATER FISH in ONTARIO's BOREAL: STATUS, CONSERVATION and POTENTIAL IMPACTS of Development David R

    FRESHWATER FISH in ONTARIO's BOREAL: STATUS, CONSERVATION and POTENTIAL IMPACTS of Development David R

    WCS CANADA CONSERVATION REPORT NO. 2 | AUGUST 2007 FRESHWATER FISH IN ONTARIO'S BOREAL: STATUS, CONSERVATION AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF dEVELOPMENT David R. Browne WCS CANADA CONSERVATION REPORT #2 AUGUST 2007 FRESHWATER FISH IN ONTARIO'S BOREAL: STATUS, CONSERVATION AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT David R. Browne WCS Canada Conservation Reports: ISSN 1719-8941 Conservation Report (Print) ISSN 1719-8968 Conservation Report (Online) ISBN 978-0-9784461-1-6 Conservation Report (Print) ISBN 978-0-9784461-2-3 Conservation Report (Online) Copies of WCSC Conservation Reports are available at: www.wcscanada.org/publications Suggested citation: Browne, D.R. 2007. Freshwater fish in Ontario's bore- al: Status, conservation and potential impacts of development. Wildlife Conservation Society Canada Conservation Report No. 2. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Cover photographs: Fish from top: northern pike – Engbretson Underwater Photography; stur- geon – Rob Criswell; brook trout – Mary Edwards; lake whitefish – © Shedd Aquarium, photo by Edward G. Lines; walleye – Engbretson Underwater Photography. Front cover landscape: Justina Ray; back cover: Carrie Sadowski, OMNR Copyright: The contents of this paper are the sole property of the authors and cannot be reproduced without permission of the authors. About Wildlife Conservation Society Canada (WCS Canada) WCS Canada's mission is to save wildlife and wildlands by improving our understanding of — and seeking solutions to — critical issues that threaten key species and large wild ecosystems throughout Canada. It both implements and supports comprehensive field studies that gather information on wildlife needs and seeks to resolve key conservation problems by working with a broad array of stakeholders, including local community members, conservation groups, reg- ulatory agencies, and commercial interests.
  • Geology of the Upper Magpie R Area

    Geology of the Upper Magpie R Area

    42CI0NE887S DOUCETT0010A1 DOUCETT 010 GEOLOGY OF THE UPPER MAGPIE RIVER AREA ALGOMA DISTRICT, OSTARIO T. W. Page, P .Eng. Port Arthur, Ontario December l, 1958. : -© O - r\. # ;©-V SUMMARY The Upper Magpie River Acea includes the south easterly section of a belt of northeasterly trending volcanic and sedimentary rooks of early Precambrian age. This belt in general occupies the drainage basin of the Kabinakagami River* The area lies some 30 miles northeasterly from White River, Ontario. Volcanic agglomerates are enclosed by inter- banded flows and tuffs which are in turn flanked by sedimentary quartz-biotile gneisses. Oranite gneiss bounds these rooks *.o the southeast and southwest. Within the central and southeasterly portion of the map area all members have been folded into a steeply plunging syncline with axial plane trend ing southeasterly such that it protrudes from the main belt. Two complementary fault planes striking northeast and northwest intersect near the centre of the area. Both show horizontal displacement. A fsw minor occurrences of metallic mineralization were found bat none w.*s indicative of economic possibilities. t*i*©..:--VJi©5&-© 1.. **©.-©-." fclfr-©v GEOLOGY OF THE UPPER MAGPIE RIVER AREA ALGOMA DISTRICT, ONTARIO LOCATION AM) ACCESS The Upper Magpie River Area lies some 30 miles northeast of White River station on the Canadian Pacific Railway from where it is most readily reached by air transportation. An alternative route is by canoe from Swanson siding on the Canadian Pacific Railway eight miles west of Franz Station. This route, also of some 30 miles, follows up through Esnagi Lake thence west into Mosambik Lake and into the Magpie River.