DOCSLIB.ORG

Port of Humboldt Bay Harbor Revitalization Plan, 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Port of Humboldt Bay Harbor Revitalization Plan, 2003 Port of Humboldt Bay Harbor Revitalization Plan Final Report February 2003 Prepared for: Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District Prepared by: PB Ports & Marine, Inc. A Parsons Brinckerhoff Company In Association with: Winzler & Kelly BST Associates Port of Humboldt Bay Harbor Revitalization Plan Table of Contents Harbor Revitalization Technical Advisory Committee ...................................................... 1 Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District ................................... 1 City of Eureka............................................................................................................. 1 County of Humboldt ................................................................................................... 1 Humboldt County Association of Governments......................................................... 1 Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 3 Key Sites ......................................................................................................................... 3 West Coast & Humboldt Trade Trends .......................................................................... 4 Market Opportunity Analysis ......................................................................................... 6 Core Advantages......................................................................................................... 7 Key Limitations .......................................................................................................... 8 Market Priorities ......................................................................................................... 8 Strategic Focus Areas ............................................................................................... 10 Harbor Revitalization Alternatives ............................................................................... 11 Alternative Scenarios................................................................................................ 11 Site Utilization Alternatives...................................................................................... 12 Recommended Harbor Revitalization Plan................................................................... 12 Recommended Strategy ............................................................................................ 12 Recommended Site Utilization ................................................................................. 13 Humboldt Bay Vision ............................................................................................... 15 Implementation Plan ..................................................................................................... 15 1. Background & Introduction ...................................................................................... 17 2. Previous Studies........................................................................................................ 18 3. Existing Port Properties ............................................................................................ 19 3.1 Key Sites ........................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1 Key Sites – With Active Cargo Terminals ............................................... 19 3.1.2 Key Sites – With Inactive Cargo Terminals ............................................. 20 3.1.3 Key Sites – Industrial, Commercial & Other............................................ 21 3.2 Other Sites of Interest ....................................................................................... 22 3.2.1 Marinas ..................................................................................................... 22 3.2.2 Boat/Ship Repair....................................................................................... 23 3.2.3 Small-Parcel Marine Development Sites.................................................. 23 3.2.3 Dredge Disposal Sites............................................................................... 23 3.2.4 Samoa Town Mixed-Use Development Site............................................. 23 4. Market Assessment – Marine Cargo......................................................................... 49 4.1 International Macroeconomic Trends............................................................... 49 4.1.1 Exchange Rates......................................................................................... 49 4.1.2 Gross Domestic Product & Trade Growth................................................ 50 4.2 Humboldt Bay Historical Cargo Movements ................................................... 56 4.2.1 All Cargoes By Direction.......................................................................... 56 4.2.2 Exports ...................................................................................................... 57 4.2.3 Imports ...................................................................................................... 58 4.2.4 Coastwise Shipments ................................................................................ 58 PB Ports & Marine, Inc. February 2003 Page i Port of Humboldt Bay Harbor Revitalization Plan 4.2.5 Coastwise Receipts ................................................................................... 59 4.3 West Coast & Humboldt Cargo Trends............................................................ 59 4.3.1 Cargo Trends – U.S. West Coast .............................................................. 59 4.3.2 Cargo Trends – Humboldt Bay................................................................. 60 4.4 Market Opportunity Analysis ........................................................................... 62 4.4.1 Humboldt Bay’s Transportation Competiveness...................................... 63 4.4.2 Dry Bulk Cargo......................................................................................... 67 4.4.3 Liquid Bulk Cargo .................................................................................... 72 4.4.4 Marine-Dependent Industrial Projects ...................................................... 73 4.4.5 Breakbulk Cargoes.................................................................................... 75 4.4.6 Automobiles.............................................................................................. 82 4.4.7 Containers ................................................................................................. 85 4.4.8 Coastal Barge Service Opportunities........................................................ 90 5. Market Assessment – Waterfront Commercial & Recreational ............................... 97 5.1 Commercial Fishing.......................................................................................... 97 5.2 Aquaculture....................................................................................................... 98 5.3 Marine Labs & Science Centers ..................................................................... 100 5.4 Public Aquarium ............................................................................................. 102 5.5 Marinas, Boating & Yachting......................................................................... 103 5.6 Cruise Ships & Tour Boats ............................................................................. 104 5.7 Boat Building & Vessel Repair....................................................................... 105 5.8 Vessel Homeporting........................................................................................ 106 5.9 Naval Vessel Museum .................................................................................... 106 6. Case Studies............................................................................................................ 111 6.1 Port of Port Angeles, WA ............................................................................... 111 6.2 Port of Grays Harbor, WA.............................................................................. 114 6.3 Port of Olympia, WA...................................................................................... 116 6.4 Port of Newport, OR....................................................................................... 117 6.5 Port of Umpqua (Reedsport), OR ................................................................... 119 6.6 Port of Richmond, CA .................................................................................... 121 6.7 Port Hueneme, CA.......................................................................................... 122 6.8 Case Study Implications for Humboldt Bay ................................................... 124 7. Prioritization of Markets......................................................................................... 125 7.1 Marine Cargo Markets .................................................................................... 126 7.1.1 Attractiveness & Competitiveness.......................................................... 126 7.1.2 Marine Cargo Market Priorities.............................................................. 128 7.2 Waterfront Commercial & Recreational Markets........................................... 129 7.2.1 Attractiveness & Competitiveness.......................................................... 129 7.2.2 Waterfront Commercial/Recreational Market Priorities......................... 130 7.3 Core Advantages &
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Port Marketing and the Challenge of the Third Generation Port
    Distr. C1ENERJ\L TD/B/C.4/J\C.7/14 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Original: ENGLISH --TRADE J\ND DEVELOPMENT. .. -·--------------------------------------------------- BOARD Committee on Shipping Ad hoc Intergovernmental Group or· Port Experts PORT MARKE'HN(; AND THE CIIALLEN(;t.~ OF Tim TJIIRI> GI·~NERATION POIU. Report 1~1' the UNC1>1 f) sl'aelluiat CONT/:'NFS Paragraphs Introduction.......................................................................................................... (i)- (iv) Surn.rnary and conclusions ....................................................................................... l - 10 Clwpter I. Recent evolution in intcrnntionnl trade nnd transport ......................................... 11 - 34 II. New role of seaports in intcnwtionnl trnnsport. foreign trade and national econornics ............................................................................................ 35 - R3 III. Port con1pctition .................................................................................................... R4- 125 IV. Port rnarkcting ................................. ........... ......................................................... 126 - 1R6 V. Port community and a port competitivcnc:'s model .......................................... 187 - 205 GE. 92 - 50020 TQfO(C.4/AC.7 /14 page li . ,·,,· Abbreviations CPS Container Freight Stntinn ED! Electronic Dntn Interchange FCL Full Container Load F1Z Free Trade Zone lAP II The International i\ssodntion or Ports and llarhors ICC International
    [Show full text]
  • Veterans Day Aboard the SS Red Oak Victory
    Veterans Day Aboard the SS Red Oak Victory Hundreds packed the partly restored World War II cargo ship in Richmond Friday to honor and celebrate veterans. By Soren Hemmila Veterans Day aboard the SS Red Oak Victory ship Supervisor John Gioia, with Mariam Sauer, an original Rosie the Riveter, help re-christen SS Red Oak Victory ship in Richmond, Veterans Day, Nov. 11, 2011. A large-than-expected crowd attended a Veterans Day event aboard the SS Red Oak Victory in Richmond Friday. The Chevron-sponsored gathering honored those who served abroad in America’s armed services as well as those who supported the war effort at home. With the threat of rain, the ceremony was moved inside the Red Oak. Hundreds packed into the hull of the cargo vessel to listen to stories of Richmond during the war years. An original "Rosie the Riveter" was on hand to help re-christen the Kaiser-built vessel. Richmond native Mariam Sauer, along with Contra Costa County Supervisor John Gioia and Richmond Vice Mayor Tom Butt, smashed a champagne bottle to reenact the 1944 launch of the munitions carrier. The ship recently underwent extensive repairs in dry dock and received a fresh coat of paint. According to the Richmond Museum of History, the Red Oak is the Victory ship from the Richmond shipyard that is being restored. Russ Yarrow of Chevron detailed the role the Richmond refinery played during World War II. The refinery won numerous production and development awards during the war. It developed special submarine lubricants and produced 100 octane aviation fuel necessary for America’s war effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1951 South River Road West Sacramento, Yolo County, California Assessor's Parcel Numbers
    Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1951 South River Road West Sacramento, Yolo County, California Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 067-180-004, 067-180-001, 058-260- 019, 058-260-017, 058-260-018, and 058-260-016 Presented to: City of West Sacramento Mr. Jon Robinson Housing and Community Investment Manager 1110 West Capitol Avenue, 2nd Floor West Sacramento, California 95691 (916) 371-0845 Presented by: SCS ENGINEERS 852 Northport Drive, Suite 5 West Sacramento, CA 95691 October 21, 2014 Project Number: 01214093.00, Task 03 Offices Nationwide www.scsengineers.com 1951South River Road (APNs: 067-180-004, 067-180-001, 067-180-019, 058-260-017, 058-260-018, & 058-260-016) Table of Contents Section Page 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Standards Background ......................................................................................................................... 2 Detailed Scope of Study ....................................................................................................................... 3 3 Objective ................................................................................................................................................. 4 4 Scope of Services .................................................................................................................................. 4 Site Reconnaissance ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Background the Whirley Crane and Shipyard Number 3
    Background The Whirley Crane and Shipyard Number 3 The “Whirley Crane,” so-called because its turret is capable of rotating 360 degrees, was built by Clyde Iron Works of Duluth, Minnesota in 1935. It was first used to build Grand Coulee Dam in Washington state, the second phase of which was done by a consortium of companies led by industrialist Henry J. Kaiser. In 1941, the crane was shipped by barge down the Columbia River and down the coast to Todd California Shipbuilding in Richmond, which later became Shipyard No 1 of Kaiser’s Richmond shipbuilding enterprise. In this location, it and dozens of others like it dominated the skyline of Richmond’s southern waterfront. Crane Facts: Weight: 229,000 pounds Boom length: 110 feet Diameter of turntable assembly: 28 feet Lifting capacity: 166,000 Original cost: $32,000 The use of Whirley Cranes was a major innovation in the mass production of ships. The cranes made it possible to turn huge ship structural pieces around and over during the pre-assembly process so that novice welders could complete relatively simple welding seams parallel to the ground. The cranes were also used in groups – as many as four cranes working together -- to move large pre-assembled parts of a ship into place in the basins so the ship could be fitted together, generally by welding. The result was a previously unimagined rate of production. A total of 747 ships were produced in the Kaiser shipyards in Richmond from 1942-1945. After the war, this crane was acquired by Parr-Richmond Terminal, which later became Levin-Richmond Terminal Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • East Brother Fog Horn
    EEaasstt BBrrototheherr FFogog HHorornn The official Newsletter of East Brother Light Station www.ebls.org The official Newsletter of East Bro ther Light Station www.ebls.org Volume 4, Issue 1 January-February 2007 Volume 4, Issue 2 March - April 2007 Global Warming! Preparations at East Brother for Predicted Rise in Ocean and San Francisco Bay Levels On what is believed to be an initiative by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, heavy equipment has shown up at East Brother Light Station to begin an effort to raise the elevation above sea level from the existing 13 feet to 26 feet. This initiative will eventually apply to every light house on the west coast with a completion date of 2078. All structures on East Brother Island will be jacked up and fill material placed under them. It is estimated that it will take approximately 6 million cubic yards of heavy rock to raise the level of the island. O nce the rock is in place, new foundations will be constructed and the buildings will be lowered on to them. The grounds will then be returned to their former condition. The work is expected to take six months and cost $46 Million Dollars. Scientists are hopeful that the rise in sea PPrreeddiicctteedd SSeeaa LLeevveellss level will be less than anticipated however they warn that if efforts to limit the DDuuee ttoo GGlloobbaall WWaarrmmiinngg greenhouse gases are too little or too late, the consequences will be enormous. East Brother hopes a benefactor will come forward to help us install solar panels in a sufficient amount to zero out the use of electricity on the Island so that no 2035 dependence on polluting sources will be necessary and thereby reduce our 2 0 1 8 contribution to the carbon dioxide gases produced through commercial generation 2 0 0 7 of electricity The American Crane Company has one crane on-site and two more expected within the next few weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Customs and Border Protection CBP Decision 19 CFR PART 101 USCBP–2006–0057 [CBP Dec
    Bureau of Customs and Border Protection CBP Decision 19 CFR PART 101 USCBP–2006–0057 [CBP Dec. 06–23] ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW PORT OF ENTRY AT SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA; REALIGNMENT OF THE PORT LIMITS OF THE PORT OF ENTRY AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection; Department of Home- land Security. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regulations pertaining to the field organization of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) by establishing a new port of entry at Sacramento, California, and terminating the user fee status of Sacramento International Airport. In order to ac- commodate this new port of entry, this document realigns the port boundaries of the port of entry at San Francisco, California (San Francisco-Oakland), since these boundaries currently encompass area that is included within the new port of Sacramento. This change is part of CBP’s continuing program to more efficiently uti- lize its personnel, facilities, and resources to provide better service to carriers, importers, and the general public. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 5, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Dore, Of- fice of Field Operations, 202-344-2776. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BACKGROUND In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register (70 FR 52336) on September 2, 2005, CBP pro- posed to amend 19 CFR 101.3(b)(1) by establishing a new port of en- try at Sacramento, California. In the notice, CBP proposed to include 1 2 CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 40, NO. 39, SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 in the port of Sacramento the Sacramento International Airport, cur- rently a user fee airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Water Resource Plan for Yolo County
    Water Resources Association of Yolo County Storm Water Resource Plan for Yolo County January 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction and SWRP Objectives ............................................................ 1-1 1.1 Plan Development ....................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Relation to Other Planning Efforts ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 SWRP Objectives .......................................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.2.1 Westside IRWM Plan Objectives .......................................................................................... 1-6 1.2.2 SWRP Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.4 Plan Organization...................................................................................................................................... 1-13 Section 2: Watershed Identification ............................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Surface Water Resources ......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Hydrologic Boundary ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2
    [Show full text]
  • The Last of 519 Liberty Ships
    www.PointRichmondHistory.org Vol. XXXII No. 2 September/October, 2013 $3.00 THE LAST OF 519 LIBERTY SHIPS FROM THE PERMANENTE METALS CORPORATION JOINS THE FLEET Keel laid June 13, 1944 and launched July 1, 1944 PRHA photo #0869 shows a 1940’s aerial view of Shipyard #3, the SS Benjamin Warner was built at Shipyard #2 across the channel while our SS Red Oak Victory was built at Shipyard #1 Point Richmond History Association From the Contents of this Issue President From the President 1 By Mid Dornan Members 2 Is it climate change that makes Summers Editor’s Notes 3 seem shorter? Remember when August was ‘vacation’ month? Remember when school A-Mid Trivia 4 began after Labor Day? Or Admission Day? Church News 6 Not August. When you were five years old Womens Westside Improvement you began kindergarten to begin your 10 learning. Today kindergarten students are At the Masquers Playhouse 13 expected to know much more before entering New Historic Photos 14 school, including: their alphabet as well as large or small letters; identify punctuations; George Coles Brooks Island 18 count to 100; add together two basic Frank Spenger, Sr. 22 numbers; know rhymes; take oral directions; 90’s Club 24 know over/under etc. Washington School is also an immersion Birthdays 25 school which means students learn Spanish Items of Interest, 1902 26 along with English. Now, eleven states no Deaths 27 longer teach cursive. It is more than climate change in our world. Welcome to Fall. Calendar 28 Richmond Harbor PRHA archive #0870 from Laverne Rentfro was taken from a 1940’s aerial photo produced by the Richmond Chamber of Commerce Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Richmond General Plan 2030 Community Vision Richmond, California in 2030
    14 Historic Resources Richmond General Plan 2030 Community Vision Richmond, California in 2030 Richmond showcases its abundant, well-preserved historic and cultural resources. The City’s history and social development is evident through its many interpretive features, historically-themed public art and surviving structures and landscapes. These character- defining resources contribute to the overall beauty and economic vitality of the City. Downtown, Point Richmond and the National Historical Park are a source of creativity and cultural reference. These areas, as well as other culturally significant activity hubs, have catalyzed further development and increased business activity and cultural tourism in Richmond. Rehabilitation and adaptive reuse projects enhance historic character while still meeting the contemporary needs of the community. New development responds to the character of historic surroundings with compatible site design, massing and complementary design details. Public outreach among residents and visitors has heightened awareness of Richmond’s pivotal role in involving women in the home front workforce, major contributions to the war effort and other important local history. Residents and visitors of all ages enjoy fes- tivals, community events and performances that trace the fascinating people who have helped shape Richmond today. 14 Historical Resources Richmond’s historic resources are woven throughout • Reviews the existing regulatory framework that the fabric of the City and offer a window into the guides historic resource planning efforts. community’s rich and colorful past. They provide tangible reminders of a past that includes the origi- Purpose of the Element nal indigenous inhabitants, early Spanish explorers Richmond’s historic resources provide an important and settlers and the American pioneers and city connection to the past, shaping the community’s builders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Establishment of the Head Port of Gloucester, 1565-1584 (Mphil
    The Establishment of the Head Port of Gloucester, 1565-1584 Alexander Higgins A thesis submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements of the degree of Master of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts, Department of Historical Studies, November 2012. 24,884 words. Abstract After a fifteen-year campaign, Gloucester became an independent head port in 1580. This effectively ended Bristol’s long-standing jurisdiction over the Gloucestershire reaches of the River Severn and resulted in the loss of the greater part of Bristol’s historic port. This dissertation explores Bristol’s objections to this change and examines the prosecution of their complaints through the equity side of the Exchequer court. Primarily, this study focuses upon two commissions created by the Crown to review the case. The interrogatories and depositions produced by these commissions are used to explore the nature of this dispute, the motivation behind Bristol’s objections and why Gloucester ultimately retained its head port status. The first chapter focuses upon the practical implementation of the commissions. Rather than relying upon the legal records alone, this study uses letters, accounts and reports produced by the two parties to explore the workings of a commission. This approach reveals the extent of Bristol and Gloucester’s attempts to manipulate proceedings to their own advantage. These findings have significant implications on the impartiality of Tudor legal process and the reliability of the Exchequer records. The second chapter examines the findings of the two commissions to assess the nature and strength of Bristol’s arguments. It is shown that many of these arguments were unsubstantiated.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Marina Bay Trail
    ↓ 2.1 mi to Point Richmond ▾ 580 Y ▾ A Must see, must do … Harbor Gate W ▶ Walk the timeline through the Rosie the Riveter Memorial to the water’s edge. RICHA centuryMO ago MarinaN BayD was Ma land ARIthat dissolvedNA into tidal marshBAY at the edge TRAIL SOUTH Shopping Center K H T R ▶ Visit all 8 historical interpretive markers and of the great estuary we call San Francisco Bay. One could find shell mounds left U R learn about the World War II Home Front. E A O G by the Huchiun tribe of native Ohlone and watch sailing vessels ply the bay with S A P T ▶ Fish at high tide with the locals (and remember Y T passengers and cargo. The arrival of Standard Oil and the Santa Fe Railroad at A your fishing license). A H A L L A V E . W B Y the beginning of the 20th century sparked a transformation of this landscape that continues ▶ Visit the S. S. Red Oak Victory ship in Shipyard #3 .26 mi M A R I N A W A Y Harbor Master A R L and see a ship’s restoration first hand. Call U today. The Marina Bay segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail offers us new opportunities B V O 510-237-2933 or visit www.ssredoakvictory.org. Future site of D to explore the history, wildlife, and scenery of Richmond’s dynamic southeastern shore. B 5 R Rosie the Riveter/ ESPLANADE DR. ▶ Be a bird watcher; bring binoculars. A .3 mi A WWII Home Front .37 mi H National Historical Park Visitor Center Marina Bay Park N Map Legend Sheridan Point I R ▶ MARINA BAY PARK was once at the heart Bay Trail suitable for walking, biking, 4 8 of Kaiser Richmond Shipyard #2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sac-Yolo Port District Public Review Draft MSR May 1, 2019
    2019 F MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY FOR THE Sacramento-Yolo Port District YOLO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT May 1, 2019 YOLO LAFCO MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW/SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY Project Name: MSR/SOI for Sacramento-Yolo Port District LAFCo Project No. 052 Yolo Local Agency Formation Commission Conducted By: 625 Court Street, Suite 203 Woodland, CA 95695 Date: May 1, 2019 (draft) Subject Agency: Sacramento-Yolo Port District Agency Address: 1110 West Capitol Avenue West Sacramento, CA 95691 Agency Contact Person: Rick Toft, Port Chief Operations Officer Date of Previous Adopted MSR/SOI: June 22, 2009 Yolo LAFCo MSR/SOI for Sacramento-Yolo Port District Public Review Draft May 1, 2019 i YOLO LAFCO MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW/SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY Contents MSR/SOI BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 3 ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY OF LAFCO ........................................................................................................ 3 PURPOSE OF A MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW ............................................................................................ 3 PURPOSE OF A SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ....................................................................................................... 4 DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES ............................................................................ 5 ORGANIZATION OF MSR/SOI STUDY ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]