DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Impact Analysis TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY of WEST SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation Impact Analysis TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY of WEST SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Appendix D Transportation Impact Analysis TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE APRIL 2016 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Street and Road System ................................................................................................................ 5 Physical Constraints on the Street and Road System ........................................................................... 5 Functional Classification of Roadways .................................................................................................. 6 Major Roadways ................................................................................................................................... 8 Arterials and Collectors ....................................................................................................................... 10 Level of Service ................................................................................................................................... 11 Traffic Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 15 Traffic Operating Conditions ............................................................................................................... 15 City Traffic Programs ........................................................................................................................... 28 2.2. Bicycle Transportation ................................................................................................................ 28 Bicycle System ..................................................................................................................................... 29 Bicycle Travel ...................................................................................................................................... 31 2.3. Pedestrian Circulation ................................................................................................................. 31 Pedestrian Facilities ............................................................................................................................ 32 Pedestrian Travel ................................................................................................................................ 32 2.4. Public Transit Service .................................................................................................................. 33 Bus Service .......................................................................................................................................... 33 Amtrak ................................................................................................................................................ 36 Streetcar.............................................................................................................................................. 36 Light Rail .............................................................................................................................................. 36 2.5. Air Transportation ....................................................................................................................... 36 Future Projects .................................................................................................................................... 37 2.6. Goods Movement ....................................................................................................................... 37 Rail ...................................................................................................................................................... 38 Truck ................................................................................................................................................... 38 Port ..................................................................................................................................................... 38 Air Cargo ............................................................................................................................................. 42 2.7. Transportation Demand Management ....................................................................................... 43 Transportation Management Plan ...................................................................................................... 43 Ride Sharing ........................................................................................................................................ 44 Park and Ride ...................................................................................................................................... 44 2.8. Parking ........................................................................................................................................ 44 Residential Parking.............................................................................................................................. 44 Non-Residential Parking ...................................................................................................................... 45 3. REGULATORY SETTING .......................................................................................................................... 47 3.1. Streets and Roadways ................................................................................................................. 47 3.2. Bicycle Transportation ................................................................................................................ 47 3.3. Pedestrian Circulation ................................................................................................................. 48 3.4. Public Transit ............................................................................................................................... 48 3.5. Air Transportation ....................................................................................................................... 48 3.6. Goods Movement ....................................................................................................................... 48 3.7. Transportation Demand Management ....................................................................................... 48 4. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 49 4.1. Standards of Significance ............................................................................................................ 49 1 Signalized Intersections: ..................................................................................................................... 49 Unsignalized Intersections: ................................................................................................................. 49 Freeway Ramps: .................................................................................................................................. 49 Freeway Segments: ............................................................................................................................. 49 Arterial and Collector Roadways ........................................................................................................ 49 Residential Streets: ............................................................................................................................. 49 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities: ........................................................................................................ 50 Transit ................................................................................................................................................. 50 4.2. Level of Service ........................................................................................................................... 50 4.3. Travel Demand Forecasting ........................................................................................................ 52 5. Future Year Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 53 5.1. Land Use Forecasts ..................................................................................................................... 53 5.2. Growth in Travel Demand ........................................................................................................... 59 5.3. Future Transit Services ................................................................................................................ 62 5.4. Roadway Improvements ............................................................................................................. 62 5.5. Impacts ........................................................................................................................................ 66 Intersections ....................................................................................................................................... 66 Freeways ............................................................................................................................................. 75 Roadway Segments
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: November 18, 2020 ITEM #12
    CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: November 18, 2020 ITEM #12 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A STREETCAR SERVICE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY: [ ] Commission [ X ] Staff Jason McCoy, Supervising Transportation Planner Capital Projects and Transportation Department [ ] Other ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action OBJECTIVE This report provides the City Council with a thorough background and update on the status of the revised Downtown Riverfront Streetcar (Streetcar Project) and provides an opportunity for Staff to receive direction from the City Council pertaining to the Streetcar Service Memorandum of Understanding. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff respectfully requests that the City Council: 1) Approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) as a framework for developing an Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement for the Streetcar Project, and delegate authority to the City Manager to execute the MOU; and 2) Recommend that the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) Board of Directors execute the MOU at their December 14, 2020 meeting as a framework for developing an Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement for the Streetcar Project. BACKGROUND The Streetcar Project received approval from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to enter Project Development as a Small Starts Project in 2014. This FTA discretionary grant program funds transit capital investments such as light rail and bus rapid transit and requires completion of the Project Development phase in advance of receipt of a construction grant agreement. The original scope of the Streetcar Project was an approximately four-mile looped system extending between the West Sacramento Civic Center and Riverfront Street, across Tower Bridge over the Sacramento River and into Downtown and Midtown Sacramento.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1951 South River Road West Sacramento, Yolo County, California Assessor's Parcel Numbers
    Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1951 South River Road West Sacramento, Yolo County, California Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 067-180-004, 067-180-001, 058-260- 019, 058-260-017, 058-260-018, and 058-260-016 Presented to: City of West Sacramento Mr. Jon Robinson Housing and Community Investment Manager 1110 West Capitol Avenue, 2nd Floor West Sacramento, California 95691 (916) 371-0845 Presented by: SCS ENGINEERS 852 Northport Drive, Suite 5 West Sacramento, CA 95691 October 21, 2014 Project Number: 01214093.00, Task 03 Offices Nationwide www.scsengineers.com 1951South River Road (APNs: 067-180-004, 067-180-001, 067-180-019, 058-260-017, 058-260-018, & 058-260-016) Table of Contents Section Page 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Standards Background ......................................................................................................................... 2 Detailed Scope of Study ....................................................................................................................... 3 3 Objective ................................................................................................................................................. 4 4 Scope of Services .................................................................................................................................. 4 Site Reconnaissance ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Usc Driving and Parking Information
    USC DRIVING AND PARKING INFORMATION Located next to one of the city’s major cultural centers, Exposition Park, USC’s 226-acre University Park campus (UPC) is just minutes from downtown Los Angeles and is easily accessible by major freeways, and by the new Metro Expo Line. The Jefferson/USC Station is the closest stop to the Davidson Conference Center. The Metro Expo Line connects the Westside by rail to Downtown LA, Hollywood, the South Bay, Long Beach, Pasadena and dozens of points in between. It runs until 2AM on Fridays and Saturdays. For your best route or more info, check the Metro Trip Planner or call (323) Go Metro (323.446.3876). Campus Map An interactive Campus can be located here. Public Parking On Campus Parking Attendees wishing to park on campus should be directed toward Parking Structure X. Parking Structure X can be accessed through Gate #3. Attendees will tell the Gate #3 parking attendant that they are here to visit the Davidson Conference Center. The Parking fee is $10.00. Directions to Davidson Conference Center from Parking Structure Exit Parking Structure X and walk towards the Gate #3 entrance. From the gate, the attendee will make a left and walk north a short distance on Figueroa and the Davidson Conference Center will be on the left-hand side (corner of Figueroa and Jefferson.) Freeway Directions to USC’s Gate #3/Structure X From 10 Fwy (east-bound) 1. Exit the freeway at Hoover Street 2. At the bottom of the off-ramp, turn right on Hoover Street 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 6 GRADE SEPARATION PROGRAM TITLE 21
    I.05-07-016 CPSD/RWC/DAR/RXM APPENDIX 1 - California Administrative Code, Title 21, Division 2, Chapter 13, Grade Separation Projects Page 1 of 6 GRADE SEPARATION PROGRAM TITLE 21. Public Works Division 2. Department of Transportation Chapter 13. Grade Separation Projects -- Applications for Allocation or Supplemental Allocations (Register 82, No. 34, filed 8-21-82) Article 1. Applications §1552. Last Date to File. April 1 of each fiscal year is the last day on which applications for allocation of grade separation funds in that fiscal year can be filed; provided, however, if April 1 is a Saturday, Sunday or a State of California holiday, then the last date of filing shall be the next business day following April 1. Filing is accomplished by filing the application with the Department of Transportation in the manner hereafter stated. §1553. Place to File. The complete application in triplicate must be received in the Office of the District Director of Transportation, State of California, in the transportation district in which the applicant is located, no later than 4:00 p.m. on the last day for filing. §1554. Contents of Application. The complete application must include a written request for an allocation in a specified monetary amount along with copies of each of the following attached to it: (a) All necessary orders of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. Necessary orders of the Public Utilities Commission include: (1) An order authorizing construction of the project; I.05-07-016 CPSD/RWC/DAR/RXM APPENDIX 1 - California Administrative Code, Title 21, Division 2, Chapter 13, Grade Separation Projects Page 2 of 6 (2) A statement of the applicant's position on the annual priority list established by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Streets & Highways Code Section 2452.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix L: Design Guidelines: I-5 NCC Project
    Appendix L: Design Guidelines: I-5 NCC Project Appendix L: Design Guidelines: I-5 NCC Project I-5 North Coast Corridor Project Final EIR/EIS page L-1 Appendix L: Design Guidelines: I-5 NCC Project I-5 North Coast Corridor Project Final EIR/EIS page L-2 Design Guidelines Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project September 2013 Prepared by: Caltrans District 11 | T.Y. Lin International | Safdie Rabines Architects | Estrada Land Planning Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project – Design Guidelines Design Guidelines Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project Prepared by: Caltrans District 11 4050 Taylor Street San Diego, CA 92110 T.Y. Lin International 404 Camino del Rio South, Suite 700 San Diego, CA 92108 | 619.692.1920 Safdie Rabines Architects 925 Ft. Stockton Drive San Diego, CA 92123 | 619.297.6153 Estrada Land Planning 755 Broadway Circle, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92101 | 619.236.0143 Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project – Design Guidelines Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project – Design Guidelines Table of Contents Design Guidelines Interstate 5 North Coast Corridor Project Table of Contents I. Project Background D. Design Themes....................17 vi. Typical Freeway Undercrossing. 36 vii. Typical Bridge Details. 37 A. Introduction....................1 i. Corridor Theme Elements. 17 ii. Corridor Theme Priorities. 19 - Southern Bluff Theme....................38 B. Purpose.......................1 - Coastal Mesa Theme.....................39 iii. Corridor Theme Units. 20 C. Components & Products. 1 - Northern Urban Theme. 40 - Southern Bluff Theme....................21 D. The Proposed Project. 2 - Coastal Mesa Theme.....................22 B. Walls.............................41 E. Previous Relevant Documents. 3 - Northern Urban Theme. 23 i. Theme Unit Specific Wall Concepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Route Map 5 Ä H339 Æ
    ASTORIA Oregon Department of Transportation Warrenton H104 Svensen Approved routes for Mayger 30 Westport ¤£ Clatskanie Æ 101 Olney Ä Rainier ¤£ H105 Triples Combinations. Æ Gearhart C L A T S O PÄ 47 Prescott SEASIDE Goble H332 202 Mist 73300 Movement is authorized 395 Umapine Necanicum Cold ¤£2 Jewell ¤£ Springs Jct. C O L U M B I A Æ Ä MP 9.76 Umatilla Jct. Milton-Freewater Flora Ä Æ Æ Cannon Beach Route Map 5 Ä H339 Æ H103 Pittsburg Irrigon Ä only under authority of an Columbia City Æ Over-Dimension Permit Unit Ä Elsie 47 730 Holdman 53 ST. HELENS ¤£ Helix 11 Vernonia Boardman 0 207 26 7 30 82 Athena Æ ¤£ Ä Over-Dimension Permit. ¤£ Revised March 2020 HERMISTON 3 ¨¦§ H Heppner Jct. Æ Ä H334 Weston Scappoose Stanfield 3 Nehalem 3 Adams 204 Manzanita HOOD Permission not granted to 5 RIVER cross RR crossing at MP 102.40 30 37 Æ 84 30 Echo Ä Wheeler Buxton £ in Hood River 84 ¤£ Arlington H W A L L O W A ¤ 3 Cascade ¨¦§ Biggs § MP 13.22 ¨¦ 26 Locks Jct. Rufus 3 Æ Rockaway Celilo Blalock Ä H320 1 Æ T I L L A M O O K ¤£ Mosier Ä 82 Beach Banks North H281 PENDLETON Plains PORTLAND Æ Ä Minam Imnaha Odell Wallowa Æ Ä 74 Garibaldi Wasco 207 W A S H I N G T O N The Elgin . Bay City Troutdale Multnomah Æ CorneliusÄ Fairview Dalles t Forest HILLSBORO H O O D H282 206 i 6 Grove Falls G I L L I A M Wood 84 Oceanside Beaverton R I V E R U M A T I L L A Summerville m H131 Village Ione r 8 ¨¦§ Lostine Æ Parkdale 197 Ä Gresham Moro 0 e Tillamook M U L T N O M A H MP 83.00 ¤£ 30 Imbler 5 Netarts ENTERPRISE Æ Ä Pilot 3 Æ Ä £ Æ Ä ¤ p Æ Ä Rock H Gaston Tigard
    [Show full text]
  • Last Link of I-90 Ends 30-Year Saga by Peggy Reynolds, Seattle Times, 9 Sept 1993
    Last Link Of I-90 Ends 30-Year Saga By Peggy Reynolds, Seattle Times, 9 Sept 1993 Erica Clibborn's red convertible will be one of the first cars Sunday across the new Lacey V. Murrow Floating Bridge, last link in a project that started before Erica was born. The University of Washington junior, who will be going home to Mercer Island for Sunday dinner, was born in 1973, the year a federal court sent the Seattle-area stretch of Interstate 90 back to square one. By then, I-90 already reached most of the 3,063 miles from Boston to south Bellevue, and the final major segment had been in the works for 10 years. It would be another 20 years before that last 7 miles would be finished. That completion will be marked this weekend with an array of public events, and Clibborn and other drivers should be able to go across the eastbound span by 5 p.m. Sunday. That opening means that I-90 survived the anti-government sentiment of the late 1960s, the mass-transit worship of the '70s and the budget cutbacks of the '80s - even while other urban interstate projects were biting the dust in New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Washington, San Francisco and Portland. Nevertheless, whether or not I-90 was really needed was subject to debate at all levels. It attracted a formidable enemies list, and was rescued regularly by a cast of hundreds. Without any one of its friends in local governments, on the state Transportation Commission, in the Legislature and in Congress, I-90 could have ended in south Bellevue instead of making it to its junction with Interstate 5 in Seattle.
    [Show full text]
  • I-90 Tolling Update
    I-90 Tolling Update John White Director of Tolled Corridors Development Paula Hammond Steve Reinmuth Secretary of Transportation Chief of Staff Seattle City Council January 28, 2012 I-90 is part of the Cross-Lake Washington Corridor • Represents two major east-west “Cross- Lake” travel corridors: I-90 and SR 520. • WSDOT is tolling SR 520 as part of a multi- faceted financing strategy to help generate enough revenue to fund replacement of the structurally-vulnerable bridge. • A new 520 bridge will give Cross-Lake WA travelers a safer, more reliable trip. 2 Funding for the SR 520 Program Construction Unfunded Program cost estimate (Oct. 2012): $4.13 billion What’s funded: $2.72 billion (includes sales tax deferral) • Pontoon construction in Grays Harbor. • The floating bridge and landings. • Eastside transit and HOV improvements. • The north half of the west approach bridge. Updated November 2012 Costs and Funding for Replacing SR 520 Bridge SR 520 program cost estimate $4.128 B Funding received to date $2.724 B State and local funding (Nickel and TPA) $0.55 B Federal funding $0.12 B SR 520 Account (tolling and future federal funds) $1.91 B Toll proceeds • TIFIA $300M • Triple pledge bonds $550M • First tier toll $159M • PAYGO $74M Federal proceeds • GARVEE $825M Deferred sales tax $0.14 B Unfunded need $1.404 B Program cost estimate based on 2012 CEVP - updated 10/25/12 4 Early Indicators of 520 Toll Success • Meeting or beating traffic forecasts. • Meeting revenue forecasts. • Most people are paying with Good To Go! accounts. – More than 384,000 active Good To Go! accounts.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS California Adaptation Planning Guide
    C A L I F O R N I A ADAPTATION PLANNING GUIDE UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS CALIFORNIA ADAPTATION PLANNING GUIDE Prepared by: California Emergency Management Agency 3650 Schriever Avenue Mather, CA 95655 www.calema.ca.gov California Natural Resources Agency 1416 Ninth Street, Suite 1311 Sacramento, CA 95814 resources.ca.gov WITH FUNDING Support From: Federal Emergency Management Agency 1111 Broadway, Suite 1200 Oakland, CA 94607-4052 California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-29 Sacramento, CA 95814-5512 WITH Technical Support From: California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 July 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Adaptation Planning Guide (APG) has benefited from the ideas, assessment, feedback, and support from members of the APG Advisory Committee, local governments, regional entities, members of the public, state and local non-governmental organizations, and participants in the APG pilot program. CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY MARK GHILARDUCCI SECRETARY MIKE DAYTON UNDERSECRETARY CHRISTINA CURRY ASSISTANT SECRETARY PREPAREDNESS KATHY MCKEEVER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION JOANNE BRANDANI CHIEF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION DIVISION, HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING DIVISION KEN WORMAN CHIEF HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING DIVISION JULIE NORRIS SENIOR EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING DIVISION KAREN MCCREADY ASSOCIATE GOVERNMENT PROGRAM ANALYST HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING DIVISION CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCE AGENCY JOHN LAIRD SECRETARY JANELLE BELAND UNDERSECRETARY
    [Show full text]
  • FY2021/22 Proposed Budget
    DARRELL STEINBERG CITY OF SACRAMENTO FACTS CITY OF SACRAMENTO Mayor The City of Sacramento was founded in 1849 and 2022 ANGELIQUE ASHBY CITY BUDGET | FISCAL SACRAMENTO OF YEAR | PROPOSED 2021-2022 Mayor Pro Tempore, District 1 is the oldest incorporated city in California. Proposed SEAN LOLOEE In 1920, city voters adopted a Charter (municipal Councilmember, District 2 constitution) and a City Council/City Manager form 2021 Budget of government. JEFF HARRIS Councilmember, District 3 The City is divided into eight districts. KATIE VALENZUELA Councilmember, District 4 Elected members of the City Council serve a four- year term. JAY SCHENIRER Vice Mayor, District 5 The Mayor is elected by all voters in the City. In ERIC GUERRA 2002, voters approved a measure for the Mayor Councilmember, District 6 to serve full-time. All other Councilmembers are elected by district and serve part-time. RICK JENNINGS, II Councilmember, District 7 The Mayor and other Councilmembers have an MAI VANG equal vote in all matters. Councilmember, District 8 The City of Sacramento currently encompasses approximately 100 square miles. The current estimated population is 510,931. CityofSacramento.org PROPOSED CITY OF SACRAMENTO FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 BUDGET DARRELL STEINBERG Mayor ANGELIQUE ASHBY JAY SCHENIRER Mayor Pro Tempore, District 1 Vice Mayor, District 5 SEAN LOLOEE ERIC GUERRA Councilmember, District 2 Councilmember, District 6 JEFF HARRIS RICK JENNINGS, II Councilmember, District 3 Councilmember, District 7 KATIE VALENZUELA MAI VANG Councilmember, District 4 Councilmember,
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Customs and Border Protection CBP Decision 19 CFR PART 101 USCBP–2006–0057 [CBP Dec
    Bureau of Customs and Border Protection CBP Decision 19 CFR PART 101 USCBP–2006–0057 [CBP Dec. 06–23] ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW PORT OF ENTRY AT SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA; REALIGNMENT OF THE PORT LIMITS OF THE PORT OF ENTRY AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection; Department of Home- land Security. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regulations pertaining to the field organization of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) by establishing a new port of entry at Sacramento, California, and terminating the user fee status of Sacramento International Airport. In order to ac- commodate this new port of entry, this document realigns the port boundaries of the port of entry at San Francisco, California (San Francisco-Oakland), since these boundaries currently encompass area that is included within the new port of Sacramento. This change is part of CBP’s continuing program to more efficiently uti- lize its personnel, facilities, and resources to provide better service to carriers, importers, and the general public. EFFECTIVE DATE: October 5, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Dore, Of- fice of Field Operations, 202-344-2776. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BACKGROUND In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register (70 FR 52336) on September 2, 2005, CBP pro- posed to amend 19 CFR 101.3(b)(1) by establishing a new port of en- try at Sacramento, California. In the notice, CBP proposed to include 1 2 CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 40, NO. 39, SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 in the port of Sacramento the Sacramento International Airport, cur- rently a user fee airport.
    [Show full text]
  • SMUD Corpyard RFQ.Indd
    September 20, 2019 Request for Qualifications (No. 190180.DJM) Redevelopment of the former SMUD Corporation Yard 59th Street, Folsom Blvd. & U.S. Hwy. 50, Sacramento, CA Responses due by 5 p.m., November 26, 2019 Powering forward. Together. 1146-19 Site Context EAST SACRAMENTO NEIGHBORHOOD St. Francis American River Kit Carson High School Parkway School CSUS Campus Camellia Shopping Center Phoebe Hearst School SITE 59th Street Light Rail Station SMUD Campus UCD Medical Center TAHOE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD Freeway Access SMUD Corporation Yard Redevelopment RFQ Table of Contents Introduction and Summary Land Area and Ownership ..............................................................................................................1 Development Objectives .................................................................................................................2 Land Use Concepts .............................................................................................................................3 Purchase and Sale/Development Agreement .....................................................................3 Supplemental Information Package .........................................................................................5 Summary of Submittal Requirements ......................................................................................5 Informational Meeting and Site Tour ......................................................................................6 Environmental Site Conditions Meeting and Site Tour ................................................6
    [Show full text]