Transportation Impact Analysis TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY of WEST SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE

Home , Interstate 5, Jefferson Boulevard, Midtown Sacramento, Port of Sacramento, Sacramento RiverTrain, Sierra Northern Railway

Appendix D Transportation Impact Analysis TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE

APRIL 2016 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...... 5 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...... 5 2.1. Street and Road System ...... 5 Physical Constraints on the Street and Road System ...... 5 Functional Classification of Roadways ...... 6 Major Roadways ...... 8 Arterials and Collectors ...... 10 Level of Service ...... 11 Traffic Conditions ...... 15 Traffic Operating Conditions ...... 15 City Traffic Programs ...... 28 2.2. Bicycle Transportation ...... 28 Bicycle System ...... 29 Bicycle Travel ...... 31 2.3. Pedestrian Circulation ...... 31 Pedestrian Facilities ...... 32 Pedestrian Travel ...... 32 2.4. Public Transit Service ...... 33 Bus Service ...... 33 Amtrak ...... 36 Streetcar...... 36 Light Rail ...... 36 2.5. Air Transportation ...... 36 Future Projects ...... 37 2.6. Goods Movement ...... 37 Rail ...... 38 Truck ...... 38 Port ...... 38 Air Cargo ...... 42 2.7. Transportation Demand Management ...... 43 Transportation Management Plan ...... 43 Ride Sharing ...... 44 Park and Ride ...... 44 2.8. Parking ...... 44 Residential Parking...... 44 Non-Residential Parking ...... 45 3. REGULATORY SETTING ...... 47 3.1. Streets and Roadways ...... 47 3.2. Bicycle Transportation ...... 47 3.3. Pedestrian Circulation ...... 48 3.4. Public Transit ...... 48 3.5. Air Transportation ...... 48 3.6. Goods Movement ...... 48 3.7. Transportation Demand Management ...... 48 4. Methodology ...... 49 4.1. Standards of Significance ...... 49

Signalized Intersections: ...... 49 Unsignalized Intersections: ...... 49 Freeway Ramps: ...... 49 Freeway Segments: ...... 49 Arterial and Collector Roadways ...... 49 Residential Streets: ...... 49 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities: ...... 50 Transit ...... 50 4.2. Level of Service ...... 50 4.3. Travel Demand Forecasting ...... 52 5. Future Year Analysis ...... 53 5.1. Land Use Forecasts ...... 53 5.2. Growth in Travel Demand ...... 59 5.3. Future Transit Services ...... 62 5.4. Roadway Improvements ...... 62 5.5. Impacts ...... 66 Intersections ...... 66 Freeways ...... 75 Roadway Segments ...... 80 Residential Streets ...... 81 Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation ...... 90 Public Transportation...... 90 5.6. Mitigations ...... 90

Appendix A: Lane Diagrams and Turning Movement Volumes

Tables Table 1: Arterial and Collector Roadways ...... 11 Table 2: Maximum Desirable Daily Volume – Roadway Segments...... 14 Table 3: Level of Service Criteria – Intersections ...... 14 Table 4: Level of Service Criteria – Freeway Facilities ...... 15 Table 5: Existing Freeway Mainline Levels of Service – A.M. Peak Hour ...... 16 Table 6: Existing Freeway Mainline Levels of Service – P.M. Peak Hour ...... 17 Table 7: Existing Freeway Ramp Levels of Service – A.M. Peak Hour ...... 20 Table 8: Existing Freeway Ramp Levels of Service – P.M. Peak Hour ...... 21 Table 9: Existing Roadway Segment Daily Volumes...... 23 Table 10: Existing Intersection Levels of Service ...... 27 Table 11: Yolobus Fixed-Route Bus Service ...... 34 Table 12: Sacramento International Airport Passenger Growth Trends ...... 37 Table 13: Sacramento County Airport System – Air Freight (in pounds) ...... 43 Table 14: Off-Street Parking Requirements for Residential Uses ...... 45 Table 15: Off-Street Parking Requirements for Non-Residential Uses ...... 46 Table 16: Citywide Land Use Forecasts ...... 54 Table 17: Estimated Growth in Citywide Person Trips over Next 5 Years ...... 59 Table 18: Percent of Citywide Trips by Travel Mode over Next 5 Years ...... 59 Table 19: Estimated Growth in Citywide Daily Vehicle Trips by 2020 ...... 60 Table 20: Estimated Growth in Total Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) by 2020 ...... 60 Table 21: Estimated Growth in Citywide Person Trips by 2035 ...... 60 Table 22: Percent of Citywide Trips by Travel Mode in 2035 ...... 61 Table 23: Estimated Growth in Citywide Daily Vehicle Trips by 2035 ...... 61 Table 24: Estimated Growth in Total Vehicle Miles Travelled by 2035 ...... 61 Table 25: Intersection Level of Service – 2020 Conditions ...... 67 Table 26: Intersections Exceeding Level of Service Policy – 2020 Conditions ...... 69 Table 27: Intersection Level of Service - 2035 Conditions ...... 71 Table 28: Intersections Exceeding Level of Service Policy 2035 Conditions ...... 73 Table 29: Freeway Mainline Level of Service – 2035 A.M. Peak Hour ...... 76 Table 30: Freeway Mainline Level of Service – 2035 P.M. Peak Hour ...... 77 Table 31: Freeway Ramp Level of Service – 2035 A.M. Peak Hour ...... 78 Table 32: Freeway Ramp Level of Service – 2035 P.M. Peak Hour ...... 79 Table 33: Roadway Segment Volumes - 2020 Conditions ...... 82 Table 34: Roadway Segment Volumes, 2035 Conditions ...... 86 Table 35: Level of Mitigation Required at Intersections with LOS Impacts in 2020 ...... 91 Table 36: Level of Mitigation Required at Intersections with LOS Impacts in 2035 ...... 91

Figures Figure 1: Constraints ...... 7 Figure 2: Functional Roadway Classifications ...... 9 Figure 3: Existing Roadway Segment Travel Lanes ...... 12 Figure 4: Existing Traffic Levels of Service ...... 22 Figure 5: Existing Bicycle Facilities ...... 30 Figure 6: Existing Bus Service ...... 35 Figure 7: Railroad Map ...... 39 Figure 8: Truck Routes ...... 40 Figure 9: Comparison of Old and New Level of Service Policies ...... 51 Figure 11: Residential Growth by Neighborhood (2020) ...... 55 Figure 12: Employment Growth by Neighborhood (2020) ...... 56 Figure 13: Residential Growth by Neighborhood (2035) ...... 57 Figure 14: Employment Growth by Neighborhood (2035) ...... 58 Figure 15: Assumed 2035 Roadway and Intersection Improvements ...... 65 Figure 16: 2020 Scenario Intersection LOS and Impacts ...... 70 Figure 17: 2035 Intersection LOS and Impacts ...... 74

1. INTRODUCTION

West Sacramento is uniquely situated with a highly comprehensive transportation network that makes the City an attractive place to live, recreate, conduct business, and transport goods. Its central geographic location and extensive north-south and east-west highway access make it a highly-valued distribution center. The hierarchal network of local streets and roads moves residents and goods through and within the City. Major transcontinental rail lines provide rail service to all parts of the nation. The Port of West Sacramento offers domestic and international shipping services.

While West Sacramento is an ideal location for many kinds of distribution-based businesses, its highways, port facilities, and rail lines tend to bisect the City and can pose a challenge to navigate by foot or bike. The City has embraced this challenge with a forward-thinking update to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan (2013). The City’s vision is to develop walkable neighborhoods, building connections with trails and paths, complete necessary level of service improvements, and improve pedestrian and bicycle access throughout the City, particularly along commuter pedestrian and cycling routes across the Sacramento River to downtown Sacramento. The City is also expanding its efforts to provide transit opportunities throughout the City. West Sacramento’s increased focused on developing bicycle, pedestrian, and trail facilities will ensure that residents and visitors will have the necessary infrastructure to lead active lifestyles and accommodate all modes of transportation for years to come. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1. Street and Road System This section describes the street and roadway network in West Sacramento and presents the existing level of service (LOS) at critical roadways and intersections. The following are key terms used in this section: • Average Daily Traffic (ADT): A 24-hour vehicle count along a roadway. • Level of Service (LOS): A way to describe how well an intersection is operating. Based on average intersection delay, a letter designation is assigned that represents the traffic flow conditions. The letter designations (A through F) represent declining conditions, with “A” being the best and “F” being the worst. • Roadway Segment: A point on a road, which may include one or two travel directions as opposed to an intersection. Physical Constraints on the Street and Road System Physical constraints on the City’s circulation system include natural and man-made barriers that limit existing and future roadway connections and alignments, thereby constraining the community’s access and circulation capacity.

The most important physical constraints on the City’s circulation include the following: • The Sacramento River which bounds West Sacramento to the north and east; • The Deep Water Ship Channel and the Yolo Bypass flood-waterway which constrain the City to the west; • The barge canal which traverses the City in an east-west direction, bisecting the City north-south; • The Southport Main Drain which splits the western half of Southport from north to south.

• The Interstate 80 and U.S. 50/Business 80 freeways which restrict local circulation patterns due to the limited number of underpasses and overpasses; The Interstate 80 and U.S. 50/Business 80 freeways are at capacity and further constrained by mainline operations • The Union Pacific Railroad and Sierra Northern Railway lines, which affects local circulation by limiting the number of street crossings. There are a limited number of East-West connectors in the northern half of the City. • Block lengths exceed the normal 0.10 mile in many neighborhoods in the north area of the City. • Many older neighborhoods lack sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities. • There are limited local bicycle circulation options in the north area of the City. • There are a number of collector and residential streets that have travel lanes exceeding 11 feet. Figure 1 shows the physical features and constraints of West Sacramento’s circulation system.

Functional Classification of Roadways The City’s streets and highways are organized and can be described in terms of a hierarchy of roadways according to their functional classifications:

Local Roadways are intended to serve adjacent properties only. They carry very little, if any, through- traffic, and generally carry very low traffic volumes. While normally discontinuous in alignment, many of West Sacramento’s local service roadways are laid out in a grid system, making through-travel possible but not desirable. Speed limits on local roadways normally do not exceed 25 miles per hour (mph). Collector Roadways are intended to “collect” traffic from local roads and carry it to roadways higher in the street classification hierarchy (e.g., arterials). Collector roads also serve adjacent properties. They generally carry light to moderate traffic volumes and speed limits are typically maintained in the 25 to 35 miles per hour range. Currently, few roads in West Sacramento can be definitely classified as collector roadways, since many local streets, in their grid layout, feed directly to arterial roads. Examples of collector roads in West Sacramento include “F” Street, Evergreen Avenue, Bryte Avenue, and Merkley Avenue. Minor Arterial Roadways are fed by local service and collector roads, provide intra-city circulation and connection to regional roadways, and often carry heavy traffic volumes. Although their primary purpose is to move heavy volumes of traffic, arterial roadways often serve adjacent properties, especially in commercial areas. Speed limits on arterial roadways often range from 35 to 45 mph. Examples of roadways falling into this class include the western end of West Capitol Avenue and the southern end of Jefferson Boulevard. Major Arterial Roadways are fed by local, collector, and minor arterial roadways, provide for major cross-town and regional travel, and carry larger volumes of traffic. They are divided roadways of four or six lanes and with a large median area which is used for auxiliary lane purposes at intersections. There should be no direct access to adjacent properties unless no reasonable alternatives exist. Such direct access should be limited to right turn-in and right turn-out movement only. Speed limits on major arterial roadways are typically at least 40 miles per hour. Examples of major arterial roadways include Harbor Boulevard, Sacramento Avenue, and Jefferson Boulevard in West Sacramento.

Figure 1: Constraints

Freeways/Expressways are intended to serve both intra-city and inter-city travel. They provide no service to adjacent properties, but rather are fed traffic from collector or arterial roadways through the use of access ramps and, therefore, do not have at-grade intersections. Freeways provide connections to other regional highways and are capable of carrying heavy traffic volumes. Speed limits on freeways are usually the highest allowed by law. Business 80/U.S. 50 and Interstate 80 (I-80) serve this function within West Sacramento.

This hierarchy of streets and highways is only a general guide to the classification of roadways which make up the circulation system. Often a street serves a dual function, and thus it is difficult to provide a definitive classification. In addition, the width of a roadway does not always correspond directly to its function in the overall circulation system, though the wider roadways tend to have more regional functions within the circulation system.

Figure 2 shows the City’s existing street and highway system according to the functional classifications as described above. The listing is based on the functional character of the streets within the overall street system, though these may differ from official designations. Major Roadways Freeways Interstate 80 (I-80), Business 80, Interstate 5 (I-5), State Route (SR) 99, and U.S. 50 are the major commuter routes to downtown Sacramento and are the links for intercity travel to and through West Sacramento. I-5 and SR 99 are major north-south routes, while I-80, Business 80, and U.S. 50 are major east-west routes. I-80 bypasses the central Sacramento area, while Business 80 links I-80 to central Sacramento.

Two freeways pass through West Sacramento. I-80 extends west across the Yolo Causeway to Davis and beyond to San Francisco. I-80 also extends northeast over the Sacramento River to the northern metropolitan Sacramento area, Reno, and beyond. There are two interchanges along I-80 in West Sacramento at Enterprise Boulevard/West Capitol Avenue and Reed Avenue (near Sacramento Avenue).

The Business 80 freeway, also known as U.S. 50 through West Sacramento, connects I-80 and West Sacramento with downtown Sacramento, I-5, SR 99, U.S. 50, and the eastern and southern parts of the Sacramento metropolitan area. Access to Business 80 is provided in West Sacramento at Harbor Boulevard (EB/WB), Jefferson Boulevard (EB/WB), and South River Road (EB only).

Although I-5 is not located in West Sacramento, it provides a critical north/south link. Key access points are via the I Street Bridge and Jibboom Street, across the Tower Bridge to P Street, and via Business 80/U.S. 50.

Figure 2: Functional Roadway Classifications

Arterials and Collectors The major arterial streets serving West Sacramento are described briefly below: • West Capitol Avenue is an east-west arterial which runs from 5th Street to I-80 near the western city limit. The roadway currently varies in width between two- and six-lanes wide. • Tower Bridge Gateway is an east-west arterial formally known as SR 275. The relinquishment of SR 275 to the City downgraded the classification from freeway to city arterial street. The city street runs from east of the Jefferson Boulevard interchange to the Tower Bridge. • Reed Avenue/Sacramento Avenue/C Street is an east-west arterial which runs from Riverside Parkway on the west to the “I” Street Bridge at the Sacramento River. It varies between two and four lanes over its length. • Industrial Boulevard/Lake Washington Boulevard is a four-lane arterial which serves the West Sacramento area south of U.S. 50/Business 80. The roadway provides a continuous route from Village Parkway on the east to Enterprise Boulevard on the west, crossing over the Palamidessi Bridge. • Linden Road is an east-west arterial that serves the Southport area of West Sacramento. Linden Road extends from South River Road on the east, crosses Jefferson Boulevard, and intersects Jefferson Boulevard again, approximately one mile south of the northern crossing. It varies between two and four lanes wide. • Jefferson Boulevard enters the City in the south and runs north to Sacramento Avenue. Jefferson Boulevard varies between two to four lanes in width and provides full access to both Tower Bridge Gateway and U.S. 50/Business 80. In addition, Jefferson Boulevard crosses the barge canal over a two bridges and is grade separated from the mainline Union Pacific Railroad line. Jefferson Boulevard is the only continuous north-south route through West Sacramento. • Harbor Boulevard varies in width between two and four lanes wide and is located in the western portion of the City. South of Reed Avenue, Harbor Boulevard is four lanes wide and crosses under the Union Pacific Railroad lines. South of West Capitol Avenue, Harbor Boulevard is four-lanes wide with full access to U.S. 50/Business 80. • Enterprise Boulevard is an arterial street which serves the western industrial area south of I-80 between West Capitol Avenue and Chanel Drive. This roadway varies between two and four lanes wide and connects to the regional freeway system via an interchange at I-80. • Southport Parkway is a curvilinear road that operates between Lake Washington Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard. The arterial street is divided by a raised median and varies between two and six travel lanes. It primarily serves the Southport neighborhood. • Tower Bridge Gateway connects the Tower Bridge with U.S. 50/Business 80. It has two travel lanes near the Tower Bridge and widened to four lanes to the east of Garden Streets. • Village Parkway is an arterial that currently extends from Stonegate Drive to Lake Washington Boulevard and is planned to be extended north to South River Road and south to Jefferson Boulevard at Southport Parkway. Table 1 lists the arterial and collector roadways in West Sacramento. Figure 3 shows a map of the existing number of travel lanes on select arterial and collector roadways.

Table 1: Arterial and Collector Roadways

Direction Major Arterials Minor Arterials Collectors Sacramento Avenue/Reed Avenue Industrial Boulevard Anna Street West Capitol Avenue “C” Street Cummins Way Tower Bridge Gateway Linden Road Evergreen Avenue Southport Parkway Village Parkway Park Boulevard Lake Washington Boulevard Fifteenth Street Michigan Boulevard Merkley Avenue East-West Higgins Road Del Monte Street Lighthouse Drive Marshall Road Stone Boulevard “F” Street Carrie Street Harbor Boulevard Enterprise Boulevard 5th Street Jefferson Boulevard North Harbor Boulevard Westacre Road South River Road North-South 3rd Street Kegle Drive Bryte Avenue

Level of Service Level of service (LOS) describes the operating conditions experienced by motorists. LOS is a qualitative measure of the effect of a number of factors, including speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, driving comfort, and convenience. LOS designations are “A” through “F” from best to worst, which cover a range of traffic operations that might occur.

The 2000 General Plan’s traffic LOS policy is as follows: To maintain LOS “C” on all streets within the city except at intersections and on roadway segments within one-quarter mile of a freeway interchange or bridge crossing of the Deep Water Ship Channel, barge canal, or Sacramento River, where LOS “D” shall be deemed acceptable. As discussed in Section 4.2, the City is proposing to modify its LOS policy for the General Plan Update.

There are different types of analyses used for calculating LOS for roadway segments, signalized intersections, unsignalized intersections, and freeway ramp intersections. The methodologies for the City of West Sacramento are described in the following paragraphs.

The standards for Caltrans’ facilities in the vicinity of West Sacramento are detailed in the US 50 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP)1 and the Interstate 80 and Capital City Freeway Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP)2. Typical Concept LOS standards in Caltrans District 3 are LOS “D” in rural areas and LOS “E” in urban areas. The 20-Year Concept LOS for U.S. 50 and Interstate 80 in the study area is LOS F, because improvements necessary to improve the LOS to E are not feasible due to environmental, right-of-way, financial, and other constraints.

1 Highway 50 Corridor System Management Plan, May 2009. 2 Interstate 80 and Capital City Freeway Corridor System Management Plan, May 2009. 11

Figure 3: Existing Roadway Segment Travel Lanes

Roadway Segments The LOS methodology used by the City to analyze roadway segments is described in the City’s Traffic Impact Guidelines (December 2006). This methodology compares the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume on a roadway segment to a “planning –level” estimate of the daily traffic volume capacity of that roadway facility. The capacity of the City’s arterial and collector roadways is primarily dictated by the capacity of its major signalized intersections. The roadway segment “capacities” represent an approximate volume when intersections along that roadway segment might start to operate at LOS F conditions during the highest hour for traffic volumes on that roadway. Roadway segment capacities are based on the number of lanes on the roadway segment and vary by its “access control level” (low, medium and high). However, these daily volume capacities do not reflect the number of turn lanes at major intersections and the volume on major cross streets, which affect the proportion of green signal time available for each roadway at signalized intersections. For this reason, the daily volume “capacity” of an arterial is a range depending on these factors.

While a roadway segment LOS analysis provides a general indication of traffic operations, a more precise LOS analysis is provided by a peak hour intersection analysis. In fact, a roadway segment analysis based on daily volumes may result in a significantly different LOS than the peak hour analysis of intersections along that roadway segment.

For the above reasons, the City intends to modify its Traffic Impact Guidelines to evaluate LOS only at its major intersections and not evaluate LOS using a roadway segment analysis.

While the City will no longer use a roadway segment analysis to estimate LOS, such an analysis is a valuable tool to identify roadway segments that may need widening. The City has established guidelines for the maximum desirable volume on a roadway segment based on the number of travel lanes and its type and its location (see Table 2). For a roadway segment that exceeds the “maximum desirable daily volume”, a detailed analysis is required to determine if that segment should be widened to accommodate additional travel lanes, including intersection LOS analysis and determining the logical segment that should be widened.

As part of this General Plan Update, the City is modifying its LOS policy, including allowing LOS E conditions in its urbanizing areas (Washington, Bridge District, Pioneer Bluff, West Capitol Avenue east of Harbor Blvd., etc.). For this reason, a higher roadway segment volume is required in these areas than other areas of the City to identify segments where studies are required to determine if additional travel lanes are needed. The City is also proposing a policy to allow exceptions to the LOS policy when other transportation goals are met and/or if non-vehicular modes are compromised. The City also intends to comply with SB 743 when preparing CEQA analyses.

Intersections For signalized and unsignalized intersections, operational analyses were conducted using a methodology outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 (HCM 2000) and Highway Capacity Manual, 2010 (HCM 2010). The HCM 2010 methodology was used in all locations except where signalized intersection characteristics deemed the methodology inappropriate. These locations include intersections with non-NEMA compliant signal phasing and certain shared lane geometries not compatible with HCM 2010 procedures. In these selected locations, the HCM 2000 methodology was employed.

The methodology utilized is known as an “operational analysis”. This procedure calculates an average control delay per vehicle for each movement at an intersection, and assigns a level of service designation based upon the average delay per vehicle.

Table 3 presents the level of service criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections based on the HCM methodology. Table 2: Maximum Desirable Daily Volume – Roadway Segments

1 Number of Maximum Desirable Daily Volume Facility Type Lanes Urbanizing Areas2 Other2

Local residential 2 4,500 2,000 Residential collector with access 2 8,000 4,800 Residential collector without access 2 10,000 8,000 Arterial, low access control 2 15,000 12,000 (4+ stops/mile, many driveways, 25-35 4 30,000 24,000 mph) 6 45,000 36,000 Arterial, moderate access control 2 18,000 14,400 (2-4 stops/mile, few driveways, 35-45 mph) 4 36,000 28,800 6 54,000 43,200 Arterial, high access control 2 20,000 16,000 (1-2 stops/mile, no driveways, 45-55 mph) 4 40,000 32,000 6 60,000 48,000 Rural, 2-lane highway 2 22,900 7,900 Rural, 2-lane road, 24-36’ paved, shoulder 2 20,000 7,100 Rural, 2-lane road 24-36’ paved, no shoulder 2 17,000 5,900 1 For roadway segments that exceed the “maximum desirable daily volume”, detailed analysis is required to determine if segment should be widened to accommodate additional travel lanes, including intersection LOS and determining the logical segment that should be widened. 2A higher volume is required in the urbanizing areas than other areas of the City to identify segments where studies are required to determine if additional travel lanes are needed Source: DKS Associates based on City of West Sacramento Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, 2006.

Table 3: Level of Service Criteria – Intersections

Level of Service Total Delay Per Vehicle (seconds) (LOS) Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections A < 10 < 10 B > 10 and < 20 > 10 and < 15 C > 20 and < 35 > 15 and < 25 D > 35 and < 55 > 25 and < 35 E > 55 and < 80 > 35 and < 50 F > 80 > 50 Source: HCM 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.

Freeway Facilities Freeway mainline segments, ramp junctions, and weaving segments were analyzed utilizing methodologies outlined in the HCM 2010. Table 4 presents the level of service criteria for the freeway mainline, freeway ramp junctions, and freeway weaving segments. Table 4: Level of Service Criteria – Freeway Facilities

Level of Maximum Density (Passenger Cars Per Mile Per Lane) Service (LOS) Mainline Ramp Junctions Weaving Segments A < 11 < 10 < 10 B > 11 and < 18 > 10 and < 20 > 10 and < 20 C > 18 and < 26 > 20 and < 28 > 20 and < 28 D > 26 and < 35 > 28 and < 35 > 28 and < 35 E > 35 and < 45 > 35 > 35 F > 45 Demand Exceeds Capacity Demand Exceeds Capacity Source: HCM 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.

Traffic Conditions Traffic Volumes Daily roadway segment counts (24-hour) were accomplished by using machine counters placed along roadways throughout the City. The majority of these were collected in May 2013 as part of the City’s speed survey update. In September 2014, 8 additional locations were collected. Turning movement volumes at major intersections were counted in the field at 48 locations in September 2014. The weekday A.M. peak hour generally falls between the hours of 7 A.M. to 9 A.M. while the P.M. peak hour generally falls between the hours of 4 P.M. to 6 P.M. Daily traffic volumes for the freeway mainlines and ramp junctions were collected from Caltrans data sources, including the 2013 Traffic Volumes report and 2013 PeMS data. The traffic counts used in the existing conditions analysis were collected before the opening of the McGowan Bridge and the extension of Village Parkway.

Traffic Operating Conditions To quantify the traffic conditions which existed in the city circa Year 2013, levels of service were calculated for each of the freeway mainline segment, freeway ramp junctions and weaving segments, major roadway segments, and intersections.

Freeway Mainline Segments The LOS for freeway mainline segments was calculated based on the densities provided earlier in Table 4. Table 5 and Table 6 present the calculated LOS for the freeway mainline segments. The following mainline segments operate at an unacceptable level of service:

• I-80 Westbound – between the US 50 Junction and West Capitol Avenue, A.M. Peak hour (LOS F); and

• US 50 Eastbound – between the I-80 Junction and Harbor Boulevard, P.M. Peak hour (LOS F).

Table 5: Existing Freeway Mainline Levels of Service – A.M. Peak Hour

Lowest Direction US 50 Segment Number Peak Hour Heavy 15-minute Density of Lanes Volume Factor Vehicles Average Speed (pcplph) LOS Interstate 80 Mace Blvd to Enterprise Blvd 3 5,028 0.95 7% 55 30.97 D Enterprise Blvd to US 50 6 5,306 0.96 7% 57 15.52 B Eastbound US 50 to Reed Ave 3 2,576 0.95 10% 50 17.09 B Reed Ave to West El Camino Ave 3 2,257 0.95 10% 55 13.60 B West El Camino Ave to Reed Ave 3 4,315 0.92 10% 54 27.37 D Reed Avenue to US 50 Junction 3 2,576 0.95 10% 51 17.03 B Westbound US 50 to West Capitol Ave 5 4,445 0.97 7% 44 20.12 F West Capitol Ave to Mace Blvd 3 5,594 0.98 7% 56 32.75 D US 50 I 80 Junction 4 4,467 0.95 6% 55 20.72 C I 80 to Harbor Boulevard 5 5,594 0.98 7% 50 21.91 C Eastbound Harbor Blvd to Jefferson Blvd Off 5 4,945 0.95 6% 57 17.55 B Between Jefferson Blvd Ramps 3 5,270 0.95 6% 57 31.41 D South River Rd to I 5 4 7,032 0.97 4% 57 31.30 D I 5 to South River Rd 4 4,326 0.98 4% 55 19.67 C South River Rd to Jefferson Blvd 3 3,285 0.98 6% 55 19.72 C Westbound Jefferson Blvd to Harbor Blvd 4 3,555 0.98 6% 55 16.02 B Harbor Blvd to I 80 4 3,706 0.96 6% 56 16.61 B I 80 Junction 5 3,706 0.96 6% 56 13.28 B Source: DKS Associates, 2014.

Bold text denotes unacceptable level of service.

Table 6: Existing Freeway Mainline Levels of Service – P.M. Peak Hour

Lowest Direction US 50 Segment Number Peak Hour Heavy 15-minute Density of Lanes Volume Factor Vehicles Average Speed (pcplph) LOS Interstate 80 Mace Blvd to Enterprise Blvd 3 5,533 0.96 7% 61 30.55 D Enterprise Blvd to US 50 6 6,333 0.97 7% 51 20.70 C Eastbound US 50 to Reed Ave 3 3,817 0.95 10% 54 23.52 C Reed Ave to West El Camino Ave 3 4,081 0.94 10% 55 24.88 C West El Camino Ave to Reed Ave 3 2,725 0.97 10% 54 16.40 B Reed Avenue to US 50 Junction 3 3,817 0.95 10% 55 23.22 C Westbound US 50 to West Capitol Ave 5 5,987 0.91 7% 56 22.58 C West Capitol Ave to Mace Blvd 3 5,180 0.98 7% 58 29.43 D US 50 I 80 Junction 4 5,423 0.98 6% 51 26.23 D I 80 to Harbor Boulevard 5 5,180 0.98 7% 47 21.94 F Eastbound Harbor Blvd to Jefferson Blvd Off 5 5,559 0.90 6% 55 21.70 C Between Jefferson Blvd Ramps 3 5,848 0.90 6% 55 38.24 E South River Rd to I 5 4 6,815 0.92 4% 55 33.13 D I 5 to South River Rd 4 4,599 0.95 4% 55 21.50 C South River Rd to Jefferson Blvd 3 3,300 0.93 6% 55 20.94 C Westbound Jefferson Blvd to Harbor Blvd 4 3,300 0.93 6% 55 15.64 B Harbor Blvd to I 80 4 3,930 0.91 6% 54 19.25 C I 80 Junction 5 3,930 0.91 6% 56 14.79 B Source: DKS Associates, 2014.

Bold text denotes unacceptable level of service.

17 Freeway Ramp Junctions and Weaving Segments The LOS for freeway ramp junctions and weaving segments was calculated based on the densities provided earlier in Table 4. Table 7 and Table 8 present the calculated LOS for the freeway ramp junctions and weaving segments during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The following ramp junctions and weaving segments operate at an unacceptable level of service:

• US 50 Eastbound – Weave between the South River Road Entrance and I-5 Ramps, A.M. Peak hour (LOS F) and P.M. Peak hour (LOS F); • US 50 Westbound – Weave between the I-5 Ramps and the South River Road/ Jefferson Boulevard Exit, A.M. Peak hour (LOS F) and P.M. Peak hour (LOS F); and • I-80 Eastbound – Weave between the Enterprise Boulevard Entrance and US 50 Ramps, P.M. Peak hour (LOS F).

Roadway Segments Table 9 presents the City’s major roadways with the existing facility type and existing daily traffic volumes by roadway segment. These volumes were collected before the opening of the McGowen Bridge and the extension of Village Parkway. The daily volumes were compared to the maximum desirable daily volumes in Table 2. For this analysis, non-residential collector roadways were considered to be arterials with low access control. The maximum desirable daily volume is currently exceeded on the following arterial and non-residential collector roadway segments:

• Jefferson Boulevard from Linden Road (South) to Davis Road; • Harbor Boulevard from US 50 Eastbound Ramps to Industrial Boulevard.

Residential Streets Unlike arterial and non-residential collector roadways, the maximum desirable daily volume on a residential street (see Table 2) is defined based on livability, not acceptable traffic operations. Table 9 includes the City’s residential collector streets. Only the following residential street segment currently exceeds thresholds for residential streets: • Kegle Drive from Anna Street to Sacramento Avenue

Intersections Levels of service for intersections are based on the intersection turning movements for both the A.M. and peak hours, the approach lane geometries at each intersection, and signal timing. Figure 4 provides a map showing the LOS for each intersection and roadway segment. Table 10 shows the levels of service for the major intersections in the city in tabular format. Most of the intersections in the City operate at an acceptable LOS (under the current LOS policy) during both peak hours. The following intersections operate at an unacceptable level of service: • Jefferson Boulevard & Sacramento Avenue, P.M. Peak hour (LOS D); • Jefferson Boulevard & Park Boulevard/US 50 Westbound Ramps, A.M. Peak hour (LOS E); • Jefferson Boulevard & Devon Ave/Gateway Drive, P.M. Peak hour (LOS E); • Jefferson Boulevard & Lake Washington Boulevard, A.M. Peak hour (LOS E) and P.M. Peak hour (LOS E);

18 • Jefferson Boulevard & Linden Road (North), A.M. Peak hour (LOS D) and P.M. Peak hour (LOS D); • Jefferson Boulevard & Marshall Road, A.M. Peak hour (LOS F); • Harbor Boulevard & Industrial Boulevard, A.M. Peak hour (LOS E) and P.M. Peak hour (LOS D); • Tower Bridge Gateway and 5th Street, P.M. Peak hour (LOS D).

19 Table 7: Existing Freeway Ramp Levels of Service – A.M. Peak Hour

Ramp Level of Direction Ramp Junction Type Volume Service Interstate 80 Enterprise Boulevard Exit One-Lane Diverge 215 D Enterprise Boulevard Entrance 406 B Weave Eastbound I 80 to Eastbound US 50 1,586 B Eastbound Westbound US 50 Entrance Major Merge 1,143 B Reed Avenue Exit One-Lane Diverge 660 C Reed Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 368 B Reed Avenue Exit One-Lane Diverge 872 D Reed Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 281 B Eastbound US 50 Exit One-Lane Diverge 694 C Westbound Entrance from Westbound I 80 1,882 B Weave West Capitol Avenue Exit 560 B Eastbound West Capitol Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 195 B Westbound West Capitol Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 102 B US 50 Westbound I 80 Entrance 694 B Weave Harbor Boulevard Exit 734 B Harbor Boulevard Entrance 518 B Eastbound Weave Jefferson Boulevard & Tower Bridge Gateway Exit 193 B Jefferson Boulevard Entrance One-Lane Merge 1,572 D South River Road Entrance Weave 708 F South River Road & Jefferson Boulevard Exit Weave 1,041 F Tower Bridge Gateway & Jefferson Boulevard Entrance Major Merge 270 B Harbor Boulevard Exit Two-Lane Diverge 993 A Westbound Northbound Harbor Boulevard Entrance One-Lane Merge 574 B Southbound Harbor Boulevard Entrance 192 B Weave Eastbound I 80 Exit 1,143 B Source: DKS Associates, 2014.

Bold text denotes unacceptable level of service.

20 Table 8: Existing Freeway Ramp Levels of Service – P.M. Peak Hour

Ramp Level of Direction Ramp Junction Type Volume Service Interstate 80 Enterprise Boulevard Exit One-Lane Diverge 284 A Enterprise Boulevard Entrance 861 F Weave Eastbound I 80 to Eastbound US 50 2,668 F Eastbound Westbound US 50 Entrance Major Merge 1,036 C Reed Avenue Exit One-Lane Diverge 520 C Reed Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 789 C Reed Avenue Exit One-Lane Diverge 549 C Reed Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 772 B Eastbound US 50 Exit One-Lane Diverge 724 D Westbound Entrance from Westbound I 80 3,093 C Weave West Capitol Avenue Exit 299 C Eastbound West Capitol Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 166 C Westbound West Capitol Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 164 C US 50 Westbound I 80 Entrance 724 C Weave Harbor Boulevard Exit 651 C Harbor Boulevard Entrance 632 C Eastbound Weave Jefferson Boulevard & Tower Bridge Gateway Exit 343 C Jefferson Boulevard Entrance One-Lane Merge 973 E South River Road Entrance Weave 626 F South River Road & Jefferson Boulevard Exit Weave 1,732 F Tower Bridge Gateway & Jefferson Boulevard Entrance Major Merge 432 B Harbor Boulevard Exit Two-Lane Diverge 859 E Westbound Northbound Harbor Boulevard Entrance One-Lane Merge 380 B Southbound Harbor Boulevard Entrance 220 B Weave Eastbound I 80 Exit 1,036 B Source: DKS Associates, 2014.

Bold text denotes unacceptable level of service.

21 Figure 4: Existing Traffic Levels of Service

22 Table 9: Existing Roadway Segment Daily Volumes

Segment Travel Daily Roadway Facility Type From To Lanes Volume Anna Street Bryte Avenue Kegle Drive Res Collector F 2 1,613 Bryte Avenue Riverbank Road Sacramento Avenue Res Collector F 2 4,057 C Street 5th Street 3rd Street Arterial M 2 10,793 Carlin Drive Oates Drive Ramco Street Res Collector NF 2 1,597 Carrie Street Bryte Avenue Kegle Drive Res Collector F 2 1,312 Cummins Way Kegle Drive 6th Street Res Collector F 2 1,483 Davis Road Jefferson Boulevard Antioch Avenue Res Collector F 2 213 Davis Road Antioch Avenue South River Road Res Collector F 2 315 Del Monte Street Harbor Boulevard Cebrian Street Arterial L 2 4,707 Enterprise Boulevard Industrial Boulevard Seaport Boulevard Arterial L 4 12,404 Enterprise Boulevard Seaport Boulevard Channel Drive Arterial M 2 5,483 Evergreen Avenue Pine Street Harbor Boulevard Arterial L 2 3,108 Evergreen Avenue Harbor Boulevard Coke Street Arterial L 2 5,335 F Street Jefferson Boulevard 8th Street Res Collector F 2 3,951 F Street 8th Street 2nd Street Res Collector F 2 1,612 Golden Gate Drive Oakland Bay Drive Promenade Street Res Collector NF 2 528 Golden Gate Drive Promenade Street Marshall Road Res Collector NF 2 1,757 Gregory Avenue Jefferson Boulevard Bevan Road Rural S 2 1,164 Gregory Avenue Bevan Road South River Road Rural S 2 1,046 Harbor Boulevard Rice Avenue West Capitol Avenue Arterial L 4 17,236 Harbor Boulevard Reed Avenue Rice Avenue Arterial H 4 19,913 Harbor Boulevard West Capitol Avenue Evergreen Avenue Arterial M 4 20,437 Higgins Road Linden Road Hart Avenue Res Collector F 2 1,542 Higgins Road Hart Avenue Jefferson Boulevard Res Collector F 2 2,646 Industrial Boulevard Enterprise Boulevard Parkway Boulevard Arterial M 4 8,174 Industrial Boulevard Parkway Boulevard Harbor Boulevard Arterial M 4 8,156 Industrial Boulevard Harbor Boulevard Stone Boulevard Arterial M 4 22,728 Jefferson Boulevard Sacramento Avenue West Capitol Avenue Arterial M 4 19,413

23 Segment Travel Daily Roadway Facility Type From To Lanes Volume Jefferson Boulevard US 50 EB Ramp 15th Street Arterial M 4 30,460 Jefferson Boulevard 15th Street Stone Boulevard Arterial M 4 34,960 Jefferson Boulevard Stone Boulevard Washington Boulevard Arterial H 4 35,053 Jefferson Boulevard Lake Washington Boulevard Linden Road (South) Arterial M 4 20,068 Jefferson Boulevard Linden Road (South) Davis Road Arterial L 2 15,040 Jefferson Boulevard Davis Road Southport Parkway Arterial M 2 4,014 Jefferson Boulevard Southport Parkway City Limits (South) Rural Hwy 2 1,695 Kegle Drive Carrie Street Anna Street Res Collector NF 2 2,578 Kegle Drive Anna Street Sacramento Avenue Res Collector F 2 8,696 Lake Washington Boulevard Stone Boulevard Southport Parkway Arterial H 4 21,450 Lake Washington Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard Stonegate Drive Arterial M 4 8,652 Lake Washington Boulevard Stonegate Drive Village Parkway Arterial M 2 2,192 Lighthouse Drive Fountain Drive A Street Arterial H 4 2,974 Lighthouse Drive Kegle Drive Fountain Drive Res Collector F 2 1,790 Linden Road (North) Summerfield Drive Jefferson Boulevard Arterial M 4 6,745 Linden Road (South) Sumerfield Drive Jefferson Boulevard Arterial M 4 2,273 Linden Road (East) Jefferson Boulevard Stonegate Drive Arterial M 2 5,551 Linden Road (East) Stonegate Drive Alder Way Arterial M 2 1,743 Linden Road (East) Alder Way South River Road Arterial M 2 667 Marshall Road Golden Gate Drive Jefferson Boulevard Res Collector NF 2 7,255 Marshall Road Marshall Road (westend) Golden Gate Drive Res Collector NF 2 4,279 Merkley Avenue Sycamore Street Westacre Road Res Collector F 2 1,799 Merkley Avenue Westacre Road Jefferson Boulevard Res Collector F 2 4,500 Michigan Boulevard Pecan Street Portsmouth Avenue Res Collector F 2 2,409 Michigan Boulevard Portsmouth Avenue Jefferson Boulevard Res Collector F 2 1,724 North Harbor Boulevard Riverbank Road Reed Avenue Arterial L 2 3,784 North Harbor Boulevard City Limits Riverbank Road Arterial H 2 3,472 Oakland Bay Drive Southport Parkway Golden Gate Drive (East) Res Collector NF 2 1,329 Park Boulevard Jefferson Boulevard 15th Street Res Collector F 2 4,025 Park Boulevard 15th Street Stone Boulevard Res Collector F 2 4,030

24 Segment Travel Daily Roadway Facility Type From To Lanes Volume Promenade Way Ramos Drive Golden Gate Drive Res Collector F 2 4,588 Riverbank Road North Harbor Road Bryte Avenue Res Collector F 2 957 Sacramento Avenue Sunset Avenue Kegle Drive Arterial M 4 15,553 Sacramento Avenue Kegle Drive 6th Street Arterial M 2 8,124 South River Road Tower Bridge Gateway Bridge Street Arterial L 4 1,497 South River Road US 50 EB Ramp 15th Street Res Collector NF 2 8,418 South River Road 15th Street END (South) Res Collector F 2 2,103 South River Road Jefferson Boulevard Linden Road Res Collector NF 2 172 South River Road Linden Road Davis Road Res Collector NF 2 234 South River Road Gregory Avenue City Limits Res Collector NF 2 889 Southport Parkway Ramco Street Lake Washington Boulevard Arterial H 4 16,306 Southport Parkway Promenade Street Ramco Street Arterial H 4 11,342 Southport Parkway Marshall Road Promenade Street Arterial H 4 4,908 Southport Parkway Jefferson Boulevard Marshall Road Arterial M 2 2,497 Stone Boulevard Industrial Boulevard Jefferson Parkway Res Collector F 2 2,459 Stonegate Drive Lake Washington Boulevard Village Parkway Res Collector NF 2 2,805 Sunset Avenue North Harbor Boulevard Sacramento Avenue Res Collector F 2 1,847 Sycamore Street West Capitol Avenue Evergreen Avenue Res Collector F 2 2,048 Terminal Street Del Monte Street Industrial Boulevard Res Collector F 2 2,340 Todhunter Avenue Anna Street Sacramento Avenue Res Collector F 2 2,604 West Capitol Avenue I 80 WB Ramps Northport Drive Arterial L 3 5,403 West Capitol Avenue Northport Drive Harbor Boulevard Arterial L 2 8,194 West Capitol Avenue Harbor Boulevard Sycamore Street Arterial L 4 12,581 West Capitol Avenue Sycamore Street Jefferson Boulevard Arterial M 6 11,185 West Capitol Avenue Jefferson Boulevard Garden Street Arterial M 4 4,992 West Capitol Avenue Garden Street 3rd Street Arterial M 2 2,411 Westacre Road Michigan Boulevard West Capitol Avenue Res Collector F 2 2,622 3rd Street B Street Tower Bridge Gateway Res Collector F 2 2,463 5th Street A Street West Capitol Avenue Arterial L 4 7,181 6th Street Cummins Way C Street Res Collector F 2 1,751

25 Segment Travel Daily Roadway Facility Type From To Lanes Volume 15th Street Jefferson Boulevard South River Road Arterial L 2 7,496 Tower Bridge Gateway Flyover Garden Street. EB Arterial H 4 8,443 Tower Bridge Gateway Flyover Garden Street. WB Arterial H 4 8,443 South River Road Bridge Street US 50 EB Ramp Arterial L 2 7,907 Jefferson Boulevard West Capitol Avenue US 50 WB Ramp Arterial M 4 20,322 Harbor Boulevard US 50 EB Ramps Industrial Boulevard Arterial M 4 41,544 Enterprise Boulevard I 80 EB Ramps Industrial Boulevard Arterial M 4 20,490 Reed Avenue West End I 80 WB Ramps Arterial M 2 6,392 Lake Washington Boulevard Southport Parkway Jefferson Boulevard Arterial M 4 17,829 Westacre Road West Capitol Avenue Park Boulevard Res Collector F 2 5,887 Reed Avenue I 80 EB Ramps Sunset Avenue Arterial M 4 25,459 Source: DKS Associates, 2014.

Volumes shaded in gray denotes roadway segment that exceeds maximum desirable daily volume (see Table 2)

Traffic counts collected in 2013 and 2014 were conducted prior to the opening of the McGowen Bridge

The following facility types are used to determine maximum desirable daily volume Arterial L - Arterial, Low Access Control Arterial M - Arterial, Moderate Access Control Arterial H - Arterial, High Access Control Rural Hwy - Rural 2-lane Highway Rural S - Rural 2-lane Road, 24'-36' of pavement, Paved Shoulders Rural NS - Rural 2-lane Road, 24'-36' of pavement, No Shoulders Res Collector F - Residential Collector with Frontage Res Collector NF - Residential Collector with No Frontage

26 Table 10: Existing Intersection Levels of Service

A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Cross-Street LOS Delay LOS Delay Jefferson Boulevard Sacramento Avenue C 32.8 D 39.0 Jefferson Boulevard F Street/ Triangle Court A 6.6 B 19.0 Jefferson Boulevard Michigan Boulevard C 21.5 B 15.7 Jefferson Boulevard West Capitol Avenue C 34.1 D 35.2 Jefferson Boulevard Merkley Avenue D 49.1 D 47.0 Jefferson Boulevard US 50 EB Off-ramp A 8.5 B 11.8 Jefferson Boulevard Park Blvd/ US 50 WB Ramps E 56.5 D 36.9 Jefferson Boulevard 15th Street C 20.5 C 34.1 Jefferson Boulevard Stone Boulevard A 9.2 A 9.2 Jefferson Boulevard South River Road B 11.1 A 5.8 Jefferson Boulevard Valley Oak Lane A 8.0 A 6.7 Jefferson Boulevard Devon Ave/ Gateway Drive C 20.3 A 9.5 Jefferson Boulevard Lake Washington Boulevard E 72.2 F 113.9 Jefferson Boulevard Linden Road (north) F 168.8 F 133.0 Jefferson Boulevard Higgins Road C 35.0 B 20.2 Jefferson Boulevard Linden Road (south) B 12.7 B 12.2 Jefferson Boulevard Marshall Road F 86.4 B 18.5 Harbor Boulevard Reed Avenue B 18.8 C 20.8 Harbor Boulevard Riverpoint Court A 8.7 B 11.1 Harbor Boulevard Rice Avenue A 9.4 B 10.5 Harbor Boulevard Duluth Street A 5.5 A 5.4 Harbor Boulevard West Capitol Avenue B 16.8 C 20.8 Harbor Boulevard Evergreen Avenue C 20.3 C 22.9 Harbor Boulevard US 50 WB Off-ramp A 7.3 A 7.1 Harbor Boulevard US 50 EB Ramps A 6.6 C 25.1 Harbor Boulevard Beacon Boulevard B 11.6 C 21.1 Harbor Boulevard Del Monte Street C 21.3 B 15.5 Harbor Boulevard Industrial Boulevard E 79.8 D 40.2 Industrial Boulevard Terminal Street B 10.3 A 9.4 Lake Washington Boulevard Southport Parkway C 29.1 C 28.0 Enterprise Boulevard Industrial Boulevard B 15.1 C 23.3 Enterprise Boulevard I-80 EB Ramps A 4.7 A 5.6 West Capitol Avenue I-80 WB Ramps B 17.0 A 9.0 West Capitol Avenue Poplar Avenue A 6.5 A 5.8 West Capitol Avenue Westacre Road B 14.4 B 13.5 West Capitol Avenue Merkley Avenue A 8.4 A 8.5 West Capitol Avenue Garden Street B 10.2 B 12.1 Tower Bridge Gateway 5th Street C 31.3 D 35.8 Tower Bridge Gateway 3rd Street/ Riverfront Street B 15.8 C 20.3 Tower Bridge Gateway Garden Street/ Riske Lane B 13.9 B 13.5 3rd Street C Street B 11.5 B 14.6 5th Street US 50 WB Ramps/ Bridge St A 8.4 A 7.4 Reed Avenue I-80 WB Ramps B 11.9 B 14.7 Reed Avenue I-80 EB Ramps B 13.1 B 12.2 Sacramento Avenue Bryte Avenue B 11.9 B 11.2 Sacramento Avenue Todhunter Avenue/ Sierra Pl B 13.1 B 10.7 Source: DKS Associates, 2014. Note: LOS shaded in gray denotes unacceptable level of service.

27 City Traffic Programs Transportation programs that affect local traffic conditions include the Residential Traffic Calming Program and Traffic Impact Fee program.

Residential Traffic Calming Program The City Council adopted the Residential Traffic Calming Program (RTCP) in July 1998 and revised the program in January 2005. The RTCP established procedures and techniques to address resident concerns about traffic issues in residential neighborhoods, particularly speeding and cut-through traffic. Through this program, residents can work with City staff to create and implement the best solutions for their particular neighborhoods.

Traffic Impact Fee Program The City updated the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program in 2005. The TIF program assesses fees on new development to support roadway improvements that would address traffic impacts caused by new development. The city is divided into six districts with fees per dwelling unit equivalent (DUE) ranging from $4,992 in the Riverfront district to $11,873 in the Southport district. The roadway improvements funded by the TIF include many of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects described above. 2.2. Bicycle Transportation The importance of alternative modes of transportation continues to increase as air pollution, fuel costs, and traffic congestion increase. West Sacramento’s relatively level terrain, mild climate, and proximity to key employment centers afford opportunities for bicycle travel. The 2013 update to the West Sacramento Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan added the following goals to the policy framework of the City: 1. A bicycle mode share of at least five percent and a walking mode share of at least ten percent by 2030. 2. A continuous and interconnected system of bikeways and walkways that provide safe and convenient travel to key destinations. 3. A continuous network of low-stress bikeways between residential areas and key destinations. 4. A transportation system that is safe for bicycling and walking such that bicyclist- and pedestrian-vehicle collision rates decrease from 2013 levels. 5. Secure and convenient bike parking at all major bicycle trip generators and attractors. 6. A bicycle system that is well integrated with other forms of transportation, including public transit. 7. New development shall provide bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly on-site circulation and access. 8. Educational opportunities aimed at all levels of bicyclists, pedestrians, motorists, and law enforcement personnel. The following section describes the existing bicycle network in the city and summarizes local and regional bicycle planning efforts. The following are key terms used in this section: • Class I (Bike Path). A facility separated from the roadway designed for the exclusive use of bicyclists and pedestrians with crossing points minimized. • Class II (Bike Lane). A restricted right-of-way within the roadway designated for the exclusive or semi- exclusive use of bicycles. Crossflows for vehicle parking and pedestrians are permitted. • Class III (Bike Route). Bicycles share the road with vehicles. Designated by signs.

28 Bicycle System West Sacramento streets serve as the connection between cities of Sacramento and Davis. West Capitol Avenue provides the direct connection from the bicycle path across the Yolo Causeway to the Tower Bridge.

A list of existing bicycle facilities in West Sacramento is illustrated in Figure 6 and provided below:

Class I Facilities • Parallel to Interstate 80, from the City of Davis to a terminus at the West Capitol Avenue Class II bike lanes; • Parallel to Riverbank Road, from Todhunter Avenue to Bryte Park; • Parallel to 3rd Street/Riverfront Street, from E Street to Mill Street; and • Parallel to the Main Canal, from Linden Road, crossing the canal, to access points along Venice Street, Suisun Bay Road, Golden Gate Drive, and Rivermont Street. Class II Facilities • Jefferson Boulevard, from north of Sacramento Avenue to West Capitol Avenue. After a gap in the vicinity of the US 50 interchange, Class II bike lanes continue from 15th Street to Harmon Road; • Tower Bridge Gateway/Garden Street/West Capitol Avenue, from the Tower Bridge, along Garden Street/West Capitol Avenue, to Jefferson Boulevard; • West Capitol Avenue, between Poplar Avenue and just east of Enterprise Boulevard, where it connects to a Class I off-street bike trail that links West Sacramento to Davis; • Lighthouse Drive, from Fountain Drive to N “A” Street; • Sacramento Avenue, from Harbor Boulevard to 5th Street; • Harbor Boulevard, from Sacramento Avenue to West Capitol Avenue; • Michigan Avenue, from Jefferson Boulevard to the Lower Northwest Interceptor alignment; • 5th Street, from Tower Bridge Gateway to Mill Street; • Park Boulevard, from Webster Street (just west of Jefferson Boulevard) to Stone Boulevard; • Industrial Boulevard/Lake Washington Boulevard, from Enterprise Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard and from Terminal Street to Village Parkway; • Southport Parkway, from the Main Canal to Otis Avenue; • Ramco Street, Class II bike lanes extend the full length of the roadway; • Carlin Drive, Class II bike lanes extend the full length of the roadway; • Oates Street, Class II bike lanes extend the full length of the roadway; • Ramos Drive, Class II bike lanes extend the full length of the roadway; • Promenade Street, Class II bike lanes extend the full length of the roadway; • Golden Gate Drive, Class II bike lanes extend the full length of the roadway; • Oakland Bay Drive, from Golden Gate Drive to San Salvador Street;

29 Figure 5: Existing Bicycle Facilities

30 • Marshall Road, Class II bike lanes extend the full length of the roadway; • Linden Road, from Spruce Street to Jefferson Boulevard and from Summerfield Drive to Jefferson Boulevard; • Gateway Drive, from Jefferson Boulevard to east of the Clarksburg Branch Line Trail; • N Beach Avenue, from Gateway Drive to Stonegate Drive; • Stonegate Drive, from Hoopa Road to Lake Washington Boulevard and from north of Lake Washington Boulevard to Village Parkway; and • Village Parkway, from Stonegate Drive to Elk Valley Street (both sides of the roadway) and from Elk Valley Street to Lake Washington Boulevard (west side of the roadway).

Class III Facilities • Lighthouse Drive, from Douglas Street to Fountain Drive; • Fountain Drive, north of Lighthouse Drive; • “C” Street, from 6th Street to 3rd Street; • West Capitol Avenue, from Garden Street to 5th Street and from Jefferson Boulevard to Poplar Avenue; • Southport Parkway, from the Main Canal to Lake Washington Boulevard; and • Linden Road, from Summerfield Drive to Jefferson Boulevard.

Bicycle Travel According to the Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan3, 1.1 percent of West Sacramento residents bicycle as their primary means of transportation to work. This is higher than the statewide average of 0.8 percent bicycle mode split. Including walking, three percent of residents primarily either bike or walk to work. This does not account for occasional bicycle commuters, or include non-commute bicycle trips to locations such as schools or shopping centers. In most areas, the percentage of non- commute bicycle trips is greater than the percentage of bicycle commute trips, as commute trips tend to be longer and less bike friendly than shopping or school-related trips. Therefore, West Sacramento’s overall bicycle and walk mode split is likely higher than the ACS estimates. For commute trips from and to destinations within the City of West Sacramento, the bicycle mode share rises to 2.5 percent. In comparison, the bicycle mode shares for West Sacramento-to-Sacramento and West Sacramento-to-Other trips are 0.8 percent and 1.2 percent, respectively. 2.3. Pedestrian Circulation The importance of active transportation in promoting healthy lifestyles and livable communities cannot be overstated. As was previously described in Section 2.2, the 2013 update to the West Sacramento Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan sets forth additional goals to support the City’s existing policies to encourage walk and bicycle trips. The following section describes the existing pedestrian facilities in the city and summarizes local and regional pedestrian planning efforts.

3 The bicycling data presented in the 2013 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan was sourced from the 2007-2009 American Community Survey (ACS) (US Census Bureau, 2010).

31 Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian facilities in West Sacramento are comprised primarily of sidewalks, marked crosswalks, pedestrian paths, and trails. Sidewalks exist on both sides of most residential streets in West Sacramento. Most residential streets, particularly in the newer neighborhoods, have sufficient width and low traffic volume to accommodate bicycles and pedestrians without additional facilities. The City has improved the pedestrian environment by filling sidewalks gaps and installing crosswalks and other pedestrian amenities throughout the city. The City has completed West Capitol Avenue streetscape improvements to create a more pedestrian friendly corridor. While continuous sidewalks were previously available, they were narrow and interrupted by driveway aprons. Scooters and wheelchair users often used the bike lanes because the sidewalks were not ADA compliant and the frequent driveway cuts make them impassable. The very long blocks and limited number of protected pedestrian crossings were improved with the implementation of mid-block crosswalks, widened sidewalks, and adequate Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access. Under the Safe Routes to School program, the City has improved other sidewalks, crosswalks, signing, and curb ramps. Further, in conjunction with roadway projects, the City continues to replace sidewalk corners with wheelchair accessible ramps.

As identified in the 2003 Parks Master Plan, natural corridors, such as the Sacramento River, the Deep Water Ship Channel, and the Main Drain Canal provide opportunities for developing pedestrian and non- motorized linkages for transportation as well as recreation. The railroad lines and waterways divide the city and opportunities for crossings are limited.

The existing River Walk Park is a paved trail that runs along the Sacramento River in West Sacramento. Plans to expand the riverfront trail to provide continuous north-south connections for pedestrians and bicyclists have been identified in various planning documents such as the Riverfront Master Plan.

Another opportunity for developing pedestrian and non-motorized trails would be along the levees. For example, South River Road is planned as a recreation trail per the Parks Master Plan. Pedestrian Travel According to the Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan 4, 1.9 percent of West Sacramento residents walk as their primary means of transportation to work. Including bicycling, three percent of residents primarily either bike or walk to work. This does not account for occasional walk commuters, or include non-commute walk trips to locations such as schools or shopping centers. In most areas, the percentage of non-commute walk trips is greater than the percentage of walk commute trips, as commute trips tend to be longer and less walkable than shopping or school-related trips. Therefore, West Sacramento’s overall bicycle and walk mode split is likely higher than the ACS estimates. For commute trips from and to destinations within the City of West Sacramento, the walk mode share rises to 5.4 percent. In comparison, the walk mode shares for West Sacramento-to-Sacramento and West Sacramento- to-Other trips are 0.5 percent and 0.0 percent, respectively.

The City has improved the pedestrian environment by filling sidewalks gaps and installing crosswalks and other pedestrian amenities throughout the city to comply with ADA.

From the community meetings and questionnaires prepared as part of the update to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan, the main purposes for walking and riding are social/recreational and health and fitness. The community preferred walking on local neighborhood sidewalks and riding bicycles on off-street bike paths. The deterrents to walking and riding included unsatisfactory or inadequate facilities between neighborhoods, unattractive scenery, and concerns about security and personal safety.

4 The pedestrian data presented in the 2013 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan was sourced from the 2007-2011 American Community Survey (ACS).

32 2.4. Public Transit Service Residents of and visitors to West Sacramento have a number of transit options including direct and connecting services that link the city with the rest of the Sacramento region as well as provide regional and national connections. Each of the transit services is described in the following sections. The following are key terms used in this section: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): ADA provides civil rights protections to qualified individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment, public accommodations, state and local government services and telecommunications. Disability is defined as a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity. Under Title II, a public entity may not deny the benefits of its programs, activities, or services to individuals with disabilities because its facilities are inaccessible. ADA accessibility guidelines have been published for public rights-of-way as well as buildings and facilities.

Paratransit: Paratransit is an alternative mode of flexible passenger transportation that does not follow fixed routes or schedules. Under ADA, public transit operators are required to provide complementary paratransit along most public transit services which receive funding from the Federal Transit Administration for those unable to ride fixed-route transit due to disabling conditions.

Ridership: The number of passengers on a given transportation system. Bus Service The Yolo County Transportation District (YCTD) administers YOLOBUS, which offers fixed-route and special services, operating 40 local and inter-city buses and 10 paratransit vehicles in the Yolo County region. YOLOBUS provides fixed-route, wheelchair-accessible services to Woodland, Winters, Knights Landing, Vacaville, Dunnigan and the Capay Valley. Service is also provided to the Sacramento International Airport, Davis with connection to bus service offered by Unitrans, and Sacramento with connection to the bus and light rail system offered by the Sacramento Regional Transit District (RT) and to passenger rail service provided by Amtrak. The existing YOLOBUS fixed-route service serving West Sacramento is shown in Table 11 and Figure 7. Ridership of select Yolobus fixed-route service was surveyed in the 2006 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). Between 2006 and 2013, weekday ridership increased on routes 210/211 and 42A/42B by 17.8 percent and 13.0 percent, respectively. The population of the City has increased during the same period by approximately 12.2 percent.

YOLOBUS Special service is provided to eligible residents as an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit service. YOLOBUS Special operates local service within West Sacramento as well as provides inter-city services between Woodland, Davis, West Sacramento, and Sacramento International Airport. Transfer to areas served by Sacramento Regional Transit’s paratransit program may be arranged. According to the SRTP, the annual ridership has declined by 10 percent over the five-year period between 2001 and 2004. At the same time, the revenue miles have increased and revenue hours have decreased suggesting that passengers are traveling longer distance within the service area.

33 Table 11: Yolobus Fixed-Route Bus Service

Average Service Headway Route Service Area Operates Schedule Weekday Type (min) Passengers

Weekdays: 6:40 am to 9:34 pm West Capitol - 35 Local 60 Daily Saturdays: 8:40 am to 7:34 pm 170 Southport Sundays: 9:40 am to 6:34 pm

Southport area to Weekdays: 4 trips each in the 39 Commute Varies M-F 123 Sacramento AM and P.M. Peak periods

West Sacramento with Weekdays: 5:40 am to 10:30 pm 40 Local connection to 60 Daily Saturdays: 7:40 am to 7:07 pm 336 Sacramento Sundays: 8:40 am to 5:30 pm

West Sacramento with 41 Local connection to 60 M-F Weekdays: 6:10 am to 8:00 pm 245 Sacramento

Sacramento, West Sacramento, Davis, Intercity Weekdays: 4:37 am to 11:43 pm 42A Woodland, 60 Daily 1,841 (clockwise) Weekends: 6:30 am to 10:48 pm Sacramento International Airport Sacramento, West Intercity Sacramento, Davis, Weekdays: 5:05 am to 11:01 pm 42B (counter- Woodland, 60 Daily 1,841 Weekends: 6:05 am to 11:01 pm clockwise) Sacramento International Airport

Sacramento to Weekdays: 5:30 am to 7:58 pm 240 Local industrial areas of 60 Daily Saturdays: 7:08 am to 6:58 pm 304 West Sacramento Sundays: 8:08 am to 5:58 pm

West Capitol, Harbor, Weekdays: 2 trips each in the 241 Commute Reed, downtown 30 M-F 60 AM and P.M. Peak periods Sacramento

Weekdays: 7 trips in the AM 340 Shuttle CalSTRS/Ziggurat Varies M-F and 6 trips in the P.M. Peak 32 periods

34 Figure 6: Existing Bus Service

35 Amtrak Amtrak operates three regional and national passenger rail routes which pass through West Sacramento with the nearest stations in downtown Sacramento and Davis. The Capitol Corridor Rail Service is administered by the Capitol Corridor Joint Power Authority and operated by Amtrak on Union Pacific Railroad tracks. It operates 15 roundtrips on weekdays and 11 roundtrips on weekends between Sacramento and Oakland. Some of the trains extend to San Jose in the southwest and Auburn to the northeast. The Coast Starlight service operates daily trips between Seattle and Los Angeles through Sacramento. The California Zephyr service offers daily trips between Chicago and Emeryville through the Sierra Nevada, the Wasatch Range, and the Rockies. Streetcar The Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Downtown/Riverfront Streetcar Study was published in March 2009 and the System Plan Report in February 2012. A Joint Environmental Assessment/ Initial Study (EA/IS) was prepared by in 2015 as an update to the project and the FTA has issued a FONSI (Finding of No Significant Impact) for the Streetcar project. This project is a joint effort by the City of West Sacramento, the City of Sacramento, RT, Caltrans, SACOG, and YCTD. It is planned to construct a streetcar system that will span from the West Sacramento Civic Center on the west and 15th Street in midtown Sacramento on the east, crossing the Sacramento River on the Tower Bridge. The streetcar will serve Raley Field, the planned Sacramento Intermodal Transportation Facility, the planned Downtown Sports and Entertainment Center, the California State Capitol building, and the Sacramento Convention Center. Potential immediate and near-term extension routes have also been identified.

The purpose of the streetcar is not to replace existing transit options, such as bus and light rail, but rather to serve as urban circulator and pedestrian accelerator to link and support the two rapidly developing downtowns of West Sacramento and Sacramento. The streetcar routes are designed to connect with RT and YOLOBUS light rail and bus service. Light Rail RT operates a light rail system with two lines radiating from Downtown Sacramento. The Gold line extends eastward to the City of Folsom and the Blue line extends northeast to Watt Avenue with bus connection to the City of Citrus Heights and south to Consumes River College with bus connection to the City of Elk Grove. In April 2002, the RT board of directors adopted an RT 20-year vision, which includes extension of a light rail line from downtown Sacramento through West Sacramento to the city of Davis. RT updated its Master Plan in 2009. The light rail extension to West Sacramento is included as a priority project in the 2025 MTP. 2.5. Air Transportation The Sacramento International Airport is the closest commercial passenger airport serving West Sacramento. The nearest general aviation airports to West Sacramento are the Sacramento Executive Airport, Mather Field, and Franklin Field.

Sacramento International Airport, located approximately 12 miles north of West Sacramento, is the main provider of passenger and cargo air transportation services for the Sacramento metropolitan area. It has two terminals with a total of 27 jet-level boarding gates and two 8,600-foot runways. The airport is served by 16 major carriers including Air Canada, Delta Air Lines, Hawaiian Airlines, Southwest Airlines, U.S. Airways, Alaska Airlines, Aloha Airlines, American Airlines, Continental Airlines, Express Jet, Jet Blue, Frontier Airlines, Horizon Air, Mexicana Airlines, Northwest Airlines, and United Airlines and one commuter airline, United Express. In 2006, the airport has over 175 scheduled daily departures to over 30 destinations. The growth of air passenger traffic has coincided with the rapid development of the region.

36 Table 12 depicts the growth trends of air passengers. However, the number of passengers dropped sharply after the 2008 recession.

Despite the currently slow rate of growth, updated (2013) forecasts of aviation activity project a 2.9 percent emplaned passenger annual average growth rate through 2035 and a gradual increase in emplaned passengers from 4.4 million in 2013 to 8.6 million in 2035. Table 12: Sacramento International Airport Passenger Growth Trends

Year Passengers 5-Year Growth

1985 2,892,005 27.6% 1990 3,631,791 25.6% 1995 6,704,470 84.6% 2000 7,935,046 18.4% 2005 10,203,066 28.6% 2010 9,090,786 (10.9%) Source: 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Sacramento County Department of Airports.

Future Projects The Draft Master Plan recommended a number of short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term improvements to the Sacramento International Airport in order to meet the projected demands. Recent improvements included the opening of the landside Terminal B and airside Concourse B in October 2011 to replace the former Terminal B, which opened in 1967. Other short-term projects include access road improvements, new air traffic control tower, new cargo facilities, and new maintenance facilities. An additional crossfield taxiway, new parallel taxiways, and runway exits are projects slated for the intermediate term. The most significant long-term improvement project is the construction of a new west runway with taxiway system. The east runway (16L/34R) and taxiways are also to be widened to 11,000 feet to accommodate larger commercial planes. Expansion of passenger terminal and parking facilities were also recommended. Any expansion may increase the number of flights to and from the Sacramento International Airport and increase traffic over West Sacramento. 2.6. Goods Movement Goods movement has been the base of city’s economy. With its central location in the state, West Sacramento has ready access to water, rail, air, and highway for goods movement. With the rapid population growth in the Sacramento metropolitan area, freight tonnage is expected to increase by 70 percent by 2020, according to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. SACOG is undertaking its first ever Regional Goods Movement Study to help integrate freight movement into the regional planning process.

In October 2006, the Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) designated Sacramento a port of entry, which was due to the volume of import business. The new port of entry serves areas including Sacramento International Airport, Mather Airport, and all points along the Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel. The following are key terms used in this section: • Port of Entry: A place where individuals or cargos may lawfully enter a country. • Berth: A place along a dock where a ship ties up or anchors.

37 • Biodegradable: Substances able to decompose naturally. • Biodiesel: A substitute for diesel fuel made wholly or partly from organic products. • Cargo: Goods carried as freight by sea, road, or air. • Foreign Trade Zone: A secure area that is considered outside of United States customs territory.

Rail Two railroad lines run through West Sacramento. The Union Pacific Railroad operates the tracks through West Sacramento providing the east-west transcontinental line from Oakland to Salt Lake City, Utah. This line carries freight as well as scheduled Amtrak passenger service between Sacramento and Oakland. The UP also operates on various spurs and sidings in the Port industrial area.

The Sierra Railroad merged with the former Yolo Shortline Railroad in 2003 to form the Sierra Northern Railroad (SERA). Sierra Northern serves rail customers along a 17-mile line between West Sacramento and Woodland. The line includes the Port of Sacramento. The southern portion of the rail line ran from the UP Holland Branch at the South River Road grade crossing to Willow Point Road in Clarksburg, CA. SERA relinquished its trackage rights south of the barge canal within the City of West Sacramento. SERA also operates special excursions, such as the Sacramento Rivertrain, over the former Yolo Shortline tracks, which run from Woodland to West Sacramento (see Figure 7). Truck Due to the Port of West Sacramento and the number of warehousing and distribution operations in West Sacramento, the city experiences high volumes of truck traffic. In light of the expanding industrial areas in Southport, the northwest area of the city, westerly West Capitol Avenue and the areas near F Street, the City adopted an ordinance in 2007 to designate twelve additional terminal truck routes in order to increase safety and efficiency for truck traffic. The currently authorized truck routes are shown in Figure 8. Port This section gives a brief history of the Port and the types and quantities of cargo handled by the Port. This section also discusses future projects at the Port.

Port Facilities The Port of West Sacramento provides both domestic and international shipping services. There are five key elements of the Port of West Sacramento: the Deep Water Ship Channel, the harbor, the barge canal, the navigational lock, and the foreign trade zone.

Deep Water Ship Channel The Deep Water Ship Channel (DWSC) runs from the southwest corner of West Sacramento north meeting the Sacramento River midway along the city's eastern border, bifurcating the city. The 43-mile- long ship channel begins in Collinsville at the mouth of the Sacramento River and ends at the harbor of West Sacramento. Access to international shipping lanes is provided via San Francisco's Golden Gate located 80 nautical miles southwest of the port.

The Army Corps of Engineers was originally charged with the responsibility for constructing, maintaining, and operating the Deep Water Ship Channel, the turning basin, the barge canal, the navigational lock, and the bascule bridge across the barge canal. Construction of these facilities commenced in 1949 and was completed in mid-1963. The construction period was extended due in part to a lack of federal funding for five years during the Korean War. The Port is now under a governance structure that allots four out of five seats on the Port Commission to West Sacramento.

38 Figure 7: Railroad Map

39 Figure 8: Truck Routes

40 The channel has three sections: a part of the Sacramento River that did not require widening; Cache Slough, that required both widening and deepening; and a new channel that was constructed across what had been dry land. The Deep Water Ship Channel is 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from Suisun Bay to Lake Washington, which was bisected to construct the turning basin. The Sacramento-Yolo Port District, when it acquired rights-of-way, left room for expansion of the channel to a width of 300 feet and up to 40 feet in depth. Many of the navigational easements were removed from the properties along the water east of the Palamadessi Bridge.

Harbor The harbor, or turning basin, at the upper end of the ship channel, and the upper 8 miles of the ship channel have a depth of 35’ as the result of completion of the first two phases of the six phase channel deepening process. The process to complete the deepening of the remaining 35 miles of the 43 mile channel is underway. It has a triangular configuration (2,000 feet by 2,400 feet by 3,100 feet) and provides drafts similar to those of the ship channel. The levees that were instrumental in converting former Lake Washington into the turning basin were constructed to provide for possible expansion of the turning basin.

Existing Port-owned terminal facilities surrounding the harbor include three wharves, two piers, and five berths. The Port can currently (as of 2014) accommodate five ships at berth at one time. The number of ships at port varies widely.

Barge Canal and Navigation Lock The barge canal, which is 11 feet deep and 120 feet wide, originally connected the harbor and the Sacramento River. The William G. Stone Navigation Lock would allow the transit of vessels between the harbor and the Sacramento River through the barge canal when the two water bodies are at different levels. The lock is 86 feet wide by 640 feet long by 13 feet deep, but is no longer operational for vessels.

The barge canal and navigational lock were initially constructed to permit the transit of shallow draft commercial, recreational, and construction vessels between the harbor and the Sacramento River, but haven’t been operational for many years due to federal budgetary constraints. In July 2007, the former Redevelopment Agency completed property acquisitions to assemble over 200 acres of Port and Army Corps property for the solicitation and selection of a master developer for the Stone Lock District. More recently, the Port has regained ownership of Stone Lock.

Foreign Trade Zone In late 1987, the Port was certified as a foreign trade zone. The zone encompasses 16 acres, including an 84,000 square foot warehouse and seven acres of vacant land. A foreign trade zone is a secure area that is considered outside of United States customs territory. The foreign zone allows companies to admit foreign and domestic merchandise into the zone for storage, exhibition, assembly, manufacture and processing without being subject to formal customs entry procedures, payment of customs duties, or federal excise taxes. Customs duties and excise taxes are deferred until the merchandise is transferred from the foreign trade zone.

Sacramento-Yolo Port District The Sacramento-Yolo Port District was created by popular vote in 1947 to undertake local responsibilities and interests in connection with the construction of the federally-authorized project. The Sacramento- Yolo Port District consists of the County of Yolo and all property owned by the Sacramento-Yolo Port District in Solano County that the Sacramento County Local Agency Formation Commission incorporated into the district. The Port District is responsible for providing terminal facilities for the interchange of cargo between water and land transportation. Five Port District Commissioners are

41 responsible for developing policy and approving plans for the Port. As noted previously, the City Council appoints four commissioners and the Yolo County Board of Supervisors appoints one commissioner.

Cargoes The Port of Sacramento handles various types of cargoes. Bulk cargo shipments consist of free flowing agricultural and mineral cargoes such as cement, grains, and industrial ores. Bulk shipping facilities include a comprehensive conveyor and ship loading systems. Convenient, transcontinental rail and truck systems and equipment support the Port facilities. A variety of high volume bulk products are received and shipped to and from all parts of the world.

The Port also handles general cargo or break bulk cargoes (packaged rather than in bulk) such as bagged rice, bundled lumber and steel coils. Project cargo such as wind turbine components or other heavy industrial components are received and shipped through the Port.

Port facilities include over two miles of conveyors, covered storage for over 200,000 tons of material, and outside storage for three times more. A 30,000 ton elevator and storage facility provides vertical storage for grains and feeds. A 22,000 ton silo is provided for bulk rice storage. Three transit sheds provide 258,000 square feet for break-bulk and palletized cargo. The Port's rail marshalling yard has a 150-car capacity.

Historically, the Port's major export cargoes have been rice (bulk and bagged), wood chips, wheat, corn, and logs. Other products exported through the port include almonds, beet pulp pellets, chromite ore, clay, and safflower. Major import cargoes include bagged and bulk cement. Other import cargoes include medium density fiberboard, lumber, stones, and steel.

The Port hit a peak of shipping activity in 1980 and has steadily declined in commodities tonnage every year since then. Trade barriers and inconsistent prices for wheat and other crops brought on the slump. In 2013, the Port handled 409,260 tons5 in total cargo. Air Cargo Sacramento International Airport and Mather Airport, operated by the Sacramento County Airport System, primarily provide air cargo service in the Sacramento region, including five freight carriers (Airborne Express, DHL Airlines, Federal Express, United Parcel Service, and West Air Industries). These freight carriers along with some of the major airlines provided cargo services and accounted for a total of 253.2 million pounds of freight in 2013 across all three airports. The numbers shown in Table 13 reflect the same trends as can be seen in total passengers (Table 12). Air freight grew alongside the region’s population until the 2008 recession, after which there was a sharp drop, followed by a slow recovery. The proportion of outbound to inbound freight has, however, generally increased in recent years at both Sacramento International Airport and Mather Airport.

5 Pacific Maritime Association Annual Report, 2013

42 Table 13: Sacramento County Airport System – Air Freight (in pounds)

Sacramento International Sacramento Executive Mather Airport Year Airport Airport Outbound Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound Inbound 2007 74,955,862 79,697,218 - - 82,530,228 72,609,458 2008 82,452,491 89,168,308 - - 87,841,564 81,703,461 2009 74,711,461 68,613,761 - - 59,841,017 58,191,158 2010 83,443,888 68,941,239 - - 46,521,727 42,714,172 2011 78,323,454 65,850,612 - - 46,538,314 37,834,087 2012 75,614,167 68,064,134 235,426 443,170 56,338,843 47,715,594 2013 77,372,625 69,790,633 152,986 340,724 59,294,143 46,300,902

Source: 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Sacramento County Department of Airports.

The Sacramento International Airport Master Plan Study (March 2001) included projections for future years for the Sacramento International Airport. It projected that total freight will grow at a rate of 8.3 percent from 1999 through 2010 and 3.8 percent from 2010 to 2020. 2.7. Transportation Demand Management As traffic volumes have increased in the Sacramento region, the City of West Sacramento and other jurisdictions have employed strategies to reduce single-occupant drivers. The City of West Sacramento has adopted the Transportation System Management (TSM) ordinance to promote alternative commute modes and reduce the total number of vehicle trips. Three strategies being employed in West Sacramento are described in this section. The following are key terms used in this section:

• Transportation Management Plan: A document detailing TSM measures to reduce vehicle trips to and from a work site.

• Rideshare programs: Programs that encourage carpool and vanpool generally for commute purposes.

• Park and Ride: A TSM strategy in which motorists drive to out-of-town parking lots from which buses or trains connect regularly to employment or city centers.

• Alternative Modes: A trip for which the transportation method is other than a single-occupant vehicle. Transportation Management Plan Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the City’s TSM ordinance requires all major employers and developers to submit a TMP and obtain an approved Transportation Management Certificate. A TMP must demonstrate compliance with the requirement of the TSM ordinance. Recent development projects that have been required to submit a TMP include the Raley’s Landing project.

43 Ride Sharing The region has continued to experience declines in carpool and transit use and increases in single occupancy auto use. To counter this trend and to encourage alternative mode choice, the 2006 MTP includes funding for transportation demand management, including a rideshare program. This program would provide ride-matching services for the Sacramento metropolitan area. Park and Ride The 2006 MTP has cited transit improvements in major urban corridors as one of its top priorities. As a result, funding has been allocated to improvement transit facilities including park and ride lots. Currently, there are two park and ride lots in West Sacramento located near Enterprise Boulevard and I-80. They are served by YOLOBUS Route 42. The YCTD Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) recommends development of a park-and-ride facility near the Southport Town Center, which would be served by Route 39 and provide a meeting point for vanpooling. Vanpools also operate from the Westbridge shopping center at Lake Washington Blvd. and Southport Parkway. 2.8. Parking Parking facilities in West Sacramento include on-street and off-street parking spaces. The City has a preferential permit parking program to address issues with on-street, non-resident parking on residential streets.

The City has identified the need for policies and actions to promote the development of necessary structured parking to support build out of the general plan and specific plans and to assure that the parking issues are handled equitably throughout the city and to support development of vibrant, urban, pedestrian- friendly environments. The following are key terms used in this section:

• Attached Dwelling: Generally refers to multi-family dwelling units that share one or more common walls with adjacent units including apartments, condominiums, and townhomes.

• Shared Parking: Parking spaces that may be shared by different operations usually in the same or adjacent parcels.

• Structured Parking: Parking spaces located in an above-grade, ramp-accessible structure, like a parking garage. Residential Parking The City’s off-street parking requirement is set forth in Zoning Ordinance 17.34.00. In February 2007, the City Council adopted an amendment to the ordinance to better reflect changes in the city’s parking demand and supply. The amendment included the establishment of three types of parking districts for residential uses as defined below: • Southport Area; • All areas north of the deep water ship channel and along the West Capitol Avenue corridor west of I-80 overpass, excluding the Waterfront zone and Central Business District; and • Central Business District, West Capitol Avenue corridor east of the I-80 overpass, Waterfront zone, including the Triangle, portions of the Washington Specific Plan area, and the Pioneer Bluff redevelopment area. As shown in Table 14, the parking space requirements for residential uses vary within each district.

44 Table 14: Off-Street Parking Requirements for Residential Uses

Land Use Suburban Infill Urban

Detached Dwellings Secondary Unit 1 1 1 1 Bedroom 1.5 1.25 1 2 Bedroom 2 1.75 1.5 3+ Bedroom 2 1.75 1.5 Guest Parking - 25% of units 15% of units Attached Dwellings Studio 1 1 1 1 Bedroom 1.25 1.25 1 2 Bedroom 2 1.5 1.25 3+ Bedroom 2 1.75 1.5 Guest Parking 25% of units 15% of units 10% of units Senior/Handicapped/Group Home 1/1000 sf 1/1000 sf 1/1000 sf

Residential guest parking requirements may be satisfied by on-street parking if the on-street parking spaces are directly adjacent to the development or on another site within 200 feet with a long-term parking lease or similar arrangement. The ordinance allows for a 25 percent reduction of the parking requirement for affordable housing units. Non-Residential Parking Off-street parking requirements for non-residential uses are summarized in Table 15.

The zoning ordinance allows for alternate standards on a project-by-project basis as determined by the Zoning Administrator based on factual information regarding parking demand. It allows the use of bicycle parking space to satisfy parking requirement on an 8:1 bicycle space to vehicle space ratio for up to 5 percent of the requirement. The ordinance also stipulates that the standards for neighborhood commercial are to be 20 percent less than the full requirement. In mixed-use developments where shared parking is possible, the ordinance allows for a 25 percent reduction in the combined parking requirement if the uses have mutually exclusive operating hours. A shared parking agreement is required. Further reduction may be approved by the Zoning Administrator.

In 2002, the City published a study, which analyzed the role of parking provisions in the development of the Washington Specific Plan and Bridge District Specific Plan areas. The study concluded that the provision of structured parking would be necessary to achieve the urban scale and character of development, and the pedestrian-friendly environment envisioned in the specific plans. It surmised that it is more advantageous for cities to develop parking rather than requiring individual developments to provide parking in densely developed downtowns or central business districts. The study recommended that a comprehensive parking plan and program be developed.

45 Table 15: Off-Street Parking Requirements for Non-Residential Uses

Land Use Minimum # of Spaces Required Retail Heavy Retail 1/750 sq. ft. Light Retail 1/250 sq. ft. Appliance Sales 1/400 sq. ft. Food Services Bar Public Area 1/100 sq. ft. Food Preparation Area 1/300 sq. ft. Seating/Serving Area 1/80 sq. ft. Services Personal Service 1/250 sq. ft. Financial Institutions 1/200 sq. ft. Automobile Service and Repair 1/400 sq. ft. Motel/Hotel 1/guest room Office Medical/Dental Offices/Hospitals 1/250 sq. ft. Business Offices 1/300 sq. ft. Labs/Research/Development 1/400 sq. ft. Industrial Light Industrial and Assembly 1/500 sq. ft. Heavy Industrial 1/2,000 sq. ft. Marina 1/2 slips Warehousing 1/2,000 sq. ft. Storage Outdoor storage 1/10,000 sq. ft. outdoor storage Mini storage 2 spaces plus 1/10,000 sq. ft. of storage unit Community Educational Business school 1/250 sq. ft. Vocational school 1/300 sq. ft. Assembly Halls/Theaters/Church Halls 1/20 sq. ft. of seating area Commercial Day Care 1/10 children or 1/staff, whichever is greater; 1 space for passenger loading/unloading for every 15 children Recreation/Entertainment/Indoors 1/300 sq. ft. Recreation/Entertainment/Outdoors 1/1,000 sq. ft. of lot Other Other uses not listed See ITE Parking Generation Manual Company vehicles 1/vehicle based on site

46 3. REGULATORY SETTING 3.1. Streets and Roadways The transportation system in West Sacramento is regulated by a number of agencies at the Federal, State, and local levels. In addition to the City of West Sacramento, which is responsible for constructing and maintaining non-State and non-Federal transportation facilities in the city, major Federal and State regulatory bodies pertinent to the city’s transportation system are described below:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): FHWA is the agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) responsible for the Federally-funded roadway system, including the interstate highway network and portions of the primary State highway network. FHWA funding is provided through the Moving Ahead For Progress in the 21st Century Act, (MAP-21). MAP-21 can be used to fund local transportation improvement projects, such as projects to improve the efficiency of existing roadways, traffic signal coordination, bikeways, and transit system upgrades.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans): Caltrans is responsible for planning, designing, constructing, and maintaining all State highways. The jurisdictional interest of Caltrans extends to improvements to roadways at the interchange ramps serving area freeways. Any Federally-funded transportation improvements would be subject to review by Caltrans staff and the California Transportation Commission.

Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG): SACOG is responsible for development of the State- and Federally-required Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) every four years in coordination with 22 cities and six counties in the greater Sacramento area. It also incorporates the long-range plans of El Dorado and Placer Counties. Local projects must be included in the MTP in order to obtain State and federal funding. For the first time, the MTP 2035 pro-actively links land use, air quality, and transportation needs. Development of the MTP 2035 included an 18-month public priority setting process to identify a list of transportation improvement projects to best meet the needs of the region as a whole.

As the designated metropolitan planning organization, SACOG is also responsible for maintaining a Federal Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP). Projects included in the MTIP are consistent with those in the MTP. 3.2. Bicycle Transportation The City of West Sacramento is responsible for constructing and maintaining the bicycle transportation system in the city. However, regional and state agencies, such as SACOG and Caltrans, affect the implementation, particularly through funding resources.

SACOG: SACOG prepares the Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan, which includes facilities in West Sacramento and sets priorities for funding.

Caltrans: Caltrans sets requirements for the bicycle master plan and requires an adopted plan to eligible for state bicycle funding.

47 3.3. Pedestrian Circulation The City of West Sacramento is responsible for constructing and maintaining the pedestrian facilities in the city.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): All public agencies must adhere to the ADA which sets design standards and guidelines for pedestrian facilities, such as sidewalks and curb ramps, to provide access for all users. 3.4. Public Transit Yolo County Transportation District (YCTD). YCTD (a.k.a. Yolobus) is responsible for countywide coordination of transit system planning, programming and prioritization of significant projects and for plan development for funding transit projects within the District. YCTD also acts as the congestion management agency (CMA) for Yolo County. YCTD is also the public transit provider in West Sacramento as operator of Yolobus.

Sacramento Regional Transit District (RT). RT operates one transit route within West Sacramento.

California Public Utility Commission (PUC). PUC is the state agency which regulates railroad, rail transit, and passenger transportation companies in California. 3.5. Air Transportation Sacramento County Airport System: The Sacramento County Airport System is a department of the County of Sacramento responsible for the planning and management of four airports in the region including Sacramento International, Executive Airport, Mather Field, and Franklin Field. 3.6. Goods Movement Sacramento-Yolo Port District: The Sacramento-Yolo Port District is responsible for the management and operation of the Port of West Sacramento. The District includes representatives from the City of West Sacramento and Yolo County.

California Public Utility Commission (PUC). PUC is a State agency which regulates railroad, rail transit, and passenger transportation companies in California. 3.7. Transportation Demand Management Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG): SACOGs 2006 MTP identifies transportation demand management strategies to reduce single-occupant drivers and address regional traffic issues.

48 4. Methodology 4.1. Standards of Significance In accordance with CEQA, the effects of a project are evaluated to determine if they will result in a significant adverse impact on the environment. The standards of significance in this analysis are based upon current practice of the appropriate regulatory agencies. The following thresholds of significance shall be used to determine if an impact is significant or mitigations are required: Signalized Intersections:

• A signalized intersection deteriorates from an acceptable LOS to an unacceptable LOS, or • The average delay increases by more than 5 seconds at a signalized intersection operating at an unacceptable LOS without the project. Unsignalized Intersections:

• An unsignalized intersection deteriorates from an acceptable LOS to an unacceptable LOS, based on average conditions across all movements and causes the intersection to meet traffic signal warrants, or • At an unsignalized intersection which meets signal warrants, the average delay is increased by more than 5 seconds for an intersection operating at an unacceptable LOS without the project. Freeway Ramps:

• A freeway ramp deteriorates from an acceptable LOS to an unacceptable LOS based on thresholds defined by Caltrans, or • Any increase in volume on a freeway ramp operating at an unacceptable LOS, even though the CSMP may allow a concept LOS F. Freeway Segments:

• A freeway segment deteriorates from an acceptable LOS to an unacceptable LOS as defined in the Caltrans Route Concept Report for that facility, or • Any increase in volume on a freeway segment operating at an unacceptable LOS, even though the CSMP may allow a concept LOS F. Arterial and Collector Roadways

• The daily traffic volume on arterial or collector roadway segment increases from an acceptable level to a level greater than the maximum desirable daily volume Residential Streets:

• The volume on a residential street increases from an acceptable level to a level greater than the maximum desirable volume, or • Residential Collector Streets – the ADT is:

- Greater than 9,000 (90% of capacity), and there is a net increase of 50 trips or more in ADT due to project related traffic

- Between 5,000 (50% of capacity) and 9,000, and the project related traffic increases the ADT by at least 12.5%, or over 9,000.

49 - Less than 5,000 and the project related traffic increases the ADT by 25% • Local Residential Streets – the ADT is:

- Greater than 1,350 (90% of capacity), and there is a net increase of 25 trips or more in ADT due to project related traffic

- Between 750 (50% of capacity) and 1,350, and the project related traffic increases the ADT by at least 12.5%, or over 1,350.

- Less than 750 and the project related traffic increases the ADT by 25% Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities: • An existing bikeway or pedestrian facility is adversely affected such that access and/or usage of the facility is discouraged or conflicts are created, or • Aspects defined in the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Path Master Plan, are impacted or affected Transit Impacts to the transit system are considered significant if the proposed project would: • Adversely affect public transit operations; or, • Fail to adequately provide access to transit. 4.2. Level of Service The city typically utilizes the methodology as described in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual6 for the analysis of signalized and unsignalized intersections. This methodology is not compatible with Non- NEMA phasing and certain combinations of shared movement lanes; in such cases the methodology from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual7 is utilized.

The City of West Sacramento’s 2000 General Plan traffic LOS policy is as follows: To maintain LOS “C” on all streets within the city except at intersections and on roadway segments within one-quarter mile of a freeway interchange or bridge crossing of the Deep Water Ship Channel, barge canal, or Sacramento River, where LOS “D” shall be deemed acceptable. For the 2015 General Plan, the traffic LOS policy has been updated to include:

LOS “E” shall be deemed acceptable within designated urbanizing districts.

Roadway segment level of service requirements were also removed with this policy update. The result of this change to the LOS policy is reflected in Figure 9.

The standards for Caltrans’ facilities in the vicinity of West Sacramento are detailed in the US 50 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP)8 and the Interstate 80 and Capital City Freeway Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP)9. Typical Concept LOS standards in Caltrans District 3 are LOS “D” in rural areas and LOS “E” in urban areas. The 20-Year Concept LOS for US 50 and Interstate 80 in the study area is LOS F, because improvements necessary to improve the LOS to E are not feasible due to environmental, right-of-way, financial, and other constraints.

6 Transportation Research Board, 2010 7 Transportation Research Board, 2000 8 Highway 50 Corridor System Management Plan, May 2009. 9 Interstate 80 and Capital City Freeway Corridor System Management Plan, May 2009.

50 Figure 9: Comparison of Old and New Level of Service Policies

51 4.3. Travel Demand Forecasting In this transportation analysis, the forecasting of travel patterns and volumes for the General Plan Update were developed through utilization of a new travel demand model for the City of West Sacramento, which is described in this section.

Over the last 20 years, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) has developed two regional travel demand models: SACMET, an “enhanced 4-step model” developed in 1994 – a state-of- the-art model at that time and later updated it several times – and SACSIM, a nationally acclaimed activity-based travel demand model that SACOG has adopted to replace SACMET for use in the development of its Metropolitan Transportation Plan and its air quality conformity analysis.

West Sacramento has been a leader in planning for smart, sustainable growth, and its leaders have embraced SACOG’s Blueprint. For purposes of Smart Growth analysis, SACOG’s SACSIM model offers several benefits over SACMET. First, it is an “activity-based” model that tracks peoples travel throughout the day in trip “tours”, while SACMET is a trip-based model that does not have those linkages. Most importantly, rather than solely relying on larger TAZs (traffic analysis zones), SACSIM allocates households and jobs to the parcel level, allowing the model to capture 1) the design of local walking environment and accurate distances for short trips, 2) smaller-scale land use differences and diversity and 3) the effects of density on travel demand. The parcel-level detail thus greatly improves forecasting of walk, bike and transit trips. SACSIM was the first parcel-level activity-based model in the US. SACSIM is more sensitive to the local physical environment than SACMET, including the presence (or absence) of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, the patterns of local street networks (e.g., grid vs. cul-de-sacs), and the density, proximity and mix of surrounding land uses (i.e. employment destinations, schools, retail, parks, etc.).

For these reasons, the City decided to use SACSIM as the “starting point” for the development of a new City of West Sacramento Travel Demand Model. While SACSIM uses parcel-level detail, its traffic assignment process uses larger “traffic analysis zones” (TAZs). SACSIM’s TAZ system and roadway system is not detailed enough to allow the City to evaluate all of its signalized intersections or all of its collector streets. The City also wants to ensure that the travel demand model used for the General Plan Update (and subsequent studies) could accurately predict traffic volumes and transit ridership on the City’s transportation system. Thus the development of the City’s new travel demand model involved the following:

• Enhancing SACSIM TAZ and transportation system within the City - development of a finer- grain TAZ system and transportation system allows the City to accurately evaluate all of its major roadways and intersections

• A thorough evaluation of the parcel-level land use, population and demographic information within the City for both existing and future (2035) conditions

• A detailed validation of the travel demand model to existing transit ridership and traffic count data

52 5. Future Year Analysis

For the purposes of the general plan update, two planning scenarios were tested in addition to the Existing Conditions analysis detailed in Section 2.1 of this report. The first of these scenarios represents a five year horizon for the City with the rest of the region maintained with existing conditions. The second scenario represents a 20 year horizon for the City with the rest of the region updated according to SACOG’s 2035 MTP. 5.1. Land Use Forecasts Base year land use estimates are based on SACOG’s updated 2012 SACSIM model land use data. City staff and the consultant team reviewed that data in detail and provided some modifications to the data to more accurately represent the base year (2014) land use within the City of West Sacramento. These modifications were fairly minor and mainly represented “filling in” missing residential units in built-out subdivisions or moving land uses from incorrect to correct parcels or traffic analysis zones. Based on the adjusted land use numbers, the City of West Sacramento contained 17,817 households and 25,208employees in 2014. Of the total existing employment in West Sacramento, 7,516(approximately 30%) was considered retail serving (retail, food, service) and 17,692(approximately 70%) was considered non-retail (education, office, government, industrial).

Two future time horizons are being analyzed for the General Plan update, a 2020 condition and a 2035 Cumulative condition. The 2020 condition represents a condition where a number of projects that have already started construction or been approved for development are added to the base year. These projects were determined by City planning staff and the project consultant. Figure 10 and Figure 11 show the residential and employment growth by neighborhood assumed for 2020. This increment includes 2,680 households and 3,763 total employees. Significant growth is assumed in areas that are already under construction, such as the Bridge District and Riverpoint, as well as areas where growth occurred before the financial downturn and has since halted, including the Southport Industrial Plan area, where 10% of employment growth is assumed for large parcels in the heart of the plan area.

The Cumulative condition is based on SACOG’s 2035 MTP forecasts. As with the base condition, City planning staff and the project consultant provided some modifications to the data to more accurately represent the Cumulative year land use within the City of West Sacramento. Modifications included eliminating growth in subdivisions that are already built-out, moving some growth from incorrect parcels to the correct ones, and adding a portion of two master plan areas (Yarborough and River Park) and build out of one Specific Plan Area (Liberty) as defined in the West Sacramento land use framework.

Table 16, Figure 12, and Figure 13 show the distribution of land use growth across the City’s neighborhoods. The table and figures show that a large percentage of the City’s anticipated growth is projected to occur north of the Main Canal with most of it occurring in the Bridge District area.

The Liberty Specific Plan is included in the Northeast Village of Southport and is assumed to be built out with 1,501 dwelling units. The River Park Master Plan is located in the Southeast Village of Southport and is assumed to be only partially built out with 200 dwelling units. The Yarborough Master Plan is located in the Southwest Village of Southport and is assumed to be only partially built out with 300 dwelling units.

53 Table 16: Citywide Land Use Forecasts

Households Total Employment Neighborhood Existing 2020 Growth 2035 Growth Existing 2020 Growth 2035 Growth North of Canal Broderick/Bryte 3,778 3,778 - 4,159 381 559 559 - 1,283 724 Central Business 296 496 200 1,030 734 1,214 1,214 - 1,309 95 District Iron Triangle - - - 629 629 887 887 - 1,223 336 Lighthouse 274 324 50 1,159 885 - - - 226 226 Michigan Glide 1,895 1,895 - 2,037 142 943 943 - 1,114 171 North of Port Ind - - - - - 1,561 1,561 - 1,561 - Old West 1,485 1,485 - 1,555 70 542 542 - 1,084 542 Sacramento Pioneer Bluff - - - 1,945 1,945 573 573 - 4,093 3,520 Port North - - - - - 100 100 - 100 - Terminal Port of Sacramento 251 251 - 262 11 5,218 5,218 - 6,068 850 Industrial Park Riverpoint - - - - - 1,876 3,022 1,146 5,121 3,245 Riverside/ CHP - - - - - 3,589 3,614 25 5,304 1,715 South of West 968 968 - 1,134 166 681 681 - 667 (14) Capitol Bridge District 122 572 450 3,335 3,213 236 236 - 6,799 6,563 Washington 753 1,118 365 2,743 1,990 2,612 2,612 - 3,602 990 West Capitol 261 261 - 557 296 439 439 - 378 (61) West End - - - - - 785 785 - 851 66 West Harbor 2 2 - 2 - 628 628 - 628 - Total North of 10,085 11,150 1,065 20,547 10,642 22,443 23,614 1,171 41,412 18,968 Canal South of Canal North East Village 2,195 2,320 125 4,317 2,122 844 844 - 1,976 1,131 of Southport North West Village 3,835 3,835 - 4,063 228 238 252 15 517 279 of Southport Rural Core 266 266 - 278 12 103 103 - 289 186 Seaway - - - - - 319 594 275 1,419 1,100 SIP 217 317 100 600 383 1,261 1,681 421 6,950 5,690 South East Village 37 37 - 230 193 - - - - - of Southport South West Village 1,182 1,232 50 1,749 567 - - - 57 57 of Southport Stone Lock - - - 784 784 - - - 1,423 1,423 Total South of 7,732 8,007 275 12,021 4,289 2,765 3,475 710 12,631 9,867 Canal Total Citywide 17,817 19,157 1,340 32,568 14,751 25,208 27,089 1,181 54,043 28,835

54 Figure 10: Residential Growth by Neighborhood (2020)

Figure 11: Employment Growth by Neighborhood (2020)

Figure 12: Residential Growth by Neighborhood (2035)

57 Figure 13: Employment Growth by Neighborhood (2035)

58 5.2. Growth in Travel Demand The City’s new travel demand model that was based on SACOG’s SACSIM model (described in Section 4.3) was used to forecast changes in travel patterns of trips generated within the City of West Sacramento for the General Plan Update. This section summarizes the change in trip generation, distribution and mode choice of trips that have an origin and/or destination within the City over the next five years and through 2035.

Table 17 summarizes the estimated change in citywide person trip generation over the next five years. The City currently generates about 58,800 daily work person trip ends, and about 439,700 daily person trip ends for all trip purposes. The development assumed over the next five years (see Section 5.1) would result in approximately 6 percent increase in daily person trips.

Table 18 summarizes the estimated change in mode choice over the next five years. Currently an estimated 84.9 percent of all commute trips are made in single occupant autos. A high percentage of non- work trips are made in autos with more than one occupant. Transit serves about 1.3 percent of all work trips and about 1.0% of all daily person trips. Walk and bike modes account for about 6.9 percent of all person trips generated citywide. Table 17: Estimated Growth in Citywide Person Trips over Next 5 Years

Daily Person Trip Ends Growth Trip Purpose Existing 2020 Amount Percent Work Trips 58,776 62,853 4,077 6.9% Non-Work Trips 380,914 404,554 23,640 6.2% All Trip Purposes 439,690 467,406 27,716 6.3% Source: DKS Associates, 2015

Table 18: Percent of Citywide Trips by Travel Mode over Next 5 Years

Percentage of Person Trips by Trip Purpose Work Trips Non-Work Trips All Trip Purposes Mode Existing 2020 Existing 2020 Existing 2020 Auto - SOV 84.9% 84.7% 48.8% 48.9% 53.6% 53.7% Auto - HOV 11.2% 11.4% 42.8% 42.5% 38.6% 38.3% Transit 1.3% 1.4% 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 1.1% Walk 1.4% 1.4% 6.6% 6.6% 5.9% 5.9% Bike 1.1% 1.1% 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Source: DKS Associates, 2015

Table 19 summarizes the growth in vehicular (auto) trip generation over the next five years. During that time, daily vehicle “trip ends” are projected to grow from about 304,800 to approximately 324,100 – a 6 percent increase. It should be noted that more than one person trip may be accommodated by a vehicle trip (e.g. carpooling).

Currently about 103,300 of the daily vehicle trip ends are associated with trips with both an origin and

59 destination within West Sacramento, or about 34 percent of the trip ends. The internal trip ends represent about 51,700 daily vehicle trips (one-half the number of internal trip ends). It is estimated that the City currently generates about 201,400 external vehicle trips that have an origin or destination inside the City, but the other end of the trip is outside of West Sacramento. Table 19: Estimated Growth in Citywide Daily Vehicle Trips by 2020

Growth Trip Type Existing 2020 Amount Percent Total Vehicle Trip Ends 304,772 324,098 19,326 6.3% Percent Internal Trip Ends1 33.9% 34.5%

Internal to West Sacramento 51,659 55,959 4,300 8.3% Vehicle Trips External to West Sacramento 201,449 212,171 10,722 5.3% Total 253,108 268,129 15,021 5.9% 1 Both trip ends within the City.

Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

Table 20 shows the estimated growth in vehicle-miles of travel by trips that have an origin or destination within the City. VMT was estimated to increase by nearly 6 percent by 2020, Table 20: Estimated Growth in Total Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) by 2020

Total VMT Growth Existing 2020 Amount Percent 2,514,411 2,658,271 143,860 5.7% VMT for trips that have an origin or destination within the City

Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

Table 21 summarizes the estimated change in citywide person trip generation through 2035. The development assumed by 2035 (see Section 5.1) would result in about a 106 percent increase in daily person trips. Table 21: Estimated Growth in Citywide Person Trips by 2035

Daily Person Trip Ends Growth Trip Purpose Existing 2035 Amount Percent Work Trips 58,776 109,777 51,001 86.8% Non-Work Trips 380,914 796,642 415,728 109.1% All Trip Purposes 439,690 906,419 466,729 106.1% Source: DKS Associates, 2015

60 Table 22 summarizes the estimated change in mode choice of the person trips generated within the City through 2035, which shows that the General Plan will result in positive changes. Transit’s share of work trips is expected to increase from 1.3% today to 5.6% by 2035. Work trips made in single-occupant autos is expected to decrease from 84.9% to 78% by 2035.The share of total trips made by walking is expected to increase from 5.9% to 8.3%. Table 22: Percent of Citywide Trips by Travel Mode in 2035

Percentage of Person Trips by Trip Purpose Work Trips Non-Work Trips All Trip Purposes Mode Existing 2035 Existing 2035 Existing 2035 Auto - SOV 84.9% 78.0% 48.8% 45.5% 53.6% 49.4% Auto - HOV 11.2% 11.0% 42.8% 40.7% 38.6% 37.1% Transit 1.3% 5.6% 0.9% 3.7% 1.0% 3.9% Walk 1.4% 3.5% 6.6% 8.9% 5.9% 8.3% Bike 1.1% 1.9% 0.9% 1.2% 1.0% 1.3% Source: DKS Associates, 2015

Table 23 summarizes the projected growth vehicular (auto) trip generation by 2035. During that time, daily vehicle “trip ends” are projected to grow by about 280,800 – a 92 percent increase.

Currently 33.9% of the daily vehicle trip ends have both their origin and destination within West Sacramento. By 2035, the internal trip ends would increase to approximately 36.2% of total vehicle trips. Table 23: Estimated Growth in Citywide Daily Vehicle Trips by 2035

Growth Trip Type Existing 2035 Amount Percent Total Vehicle Trip Ends 304,772 585,617 280,845 92.1% Percent Internal Trip Ends1 33.9% 36.2%

Internal to West Sacramento 51,659 105,994 54,335 105.2% Vehicle Trips External to West Sacramento 201,449 373,616 172,167 85.5% Total 253,108 479,610 226,502 89.5% 1. Both trip ends within the City.

Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

Table 24 shows the estimated growth in VMT by trips that have an origin or destination within the City. VMT was estimated to increase by 76% by 2035, which is less than the 106% growth in total person trips Table 24: Estimated Growth in Total Vehicle Miles Travelled by 2035

Total VMT Growth Existing 2035 Amount Percent 2,514,411 4,435,791 1,921,380 76.4% Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

61 5.3. Future Transit Services The assumed future transit services within West Sacramento are based on SACOG’s MTP/SCS. Currently, Yolobus operates approximately 54 revenue service hours on its routes through the City. SACOG’s MTP/SCS projects that bus service in the City will expand to 193 revenue hours by 2035, a 257% increase. This increased bus service is in addition to the new streetcar that will serve trips between West Sacramento and Downtown Sacramento. 5.4. Roadway Improvements In addition to the land uses assumed to be in place for the two future scenarios, a number of roadway and intersection improvements are assumed to be in place as well. For the “five year” baseline scenario, the only roadway added to the Existing Base scenario is the recently opened Mike McGowan Bridge, a two lane crossing of the Main Canal connecting South River Road in the Pioneer Bluff neighborhood to Locks Drive in the Stone Lock neighborhood. A number of new roadways, widened roadways, and improved intersections are assumed to be in place by 2035. These improvements consist of roadway and intersection improvements assumed to be reasonable and feasible to accommodate anticipated future traffic growth. These are not considered to be mitigation measures. They are meant to identify a robust transportation network for the general plan horizon year of 2035. Roadway and intersection improvements assumed are shown in Figure 14 and include the following: Widening of Existing Roadways • West Capitol Avenue Northport Drive to Harbor Boulevard: widen from 2 to 4 lanes - th - Garden Street to 5 Street: widen from 2 to 4 lanes - I-80 westbound on-ramp to I-80 westbound off-ramp: widen from 2 to 4 lanes • Reed Avenue - I-80 eastbound ramps to Harbor Boulevard: widen from 4 to 6 lanes • Harbor Boulevard - West Capitol Avenue to Evergreen Avenue: widen from 4 to 6 lanes • Lake Washington Boulevard - Southport Parkway to Jefferson Boulevard: widen from 4 to 6 lanes • Jefferson Boulevard - Linden Road (south) to Davis Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes • Riverfront Street - Tower Bridge Gateway to Mill Street: widen from 2 to 4 lanes • Mill Street th - 5 Street to Riverfront Street: widen from 2 to 4 lanes • 5th Street - Bridge Street to South River Road: widen from 2 to 4 lanes • South River Road th - 5 Street to Main Canal: widen from 2 to 4 lanes • Village Parkway - Stonegate Drive to Lake Washington Boulevard: widen from 2 to 4 lanes

62 New Roadways • South River Road bridge across Main Canal: eventual 4 lane bridge10 • Village Parkway connector to S River Road: 4 lane roadway11 • Enterprise bridge across Main Canal: 2 lane bridge • Garden Street connector to 5th Street: 2 lane roadway • Liberty Plan roadways - Village Parkway extension: 2 lane roadway - Stonegate Drive extension: 2 lane roadway • River Park Plan roadways - Village Parkway extension: 2 lane roadway - Stonegate Drive extension: 2 lane roadway • Yarborough Plan roadways - Southport Parkway extension: 2 lane roadway - Other 2 unnamed 2 lane roadways

Intersection Improvements • Jefferson Boulevard/ Kegle Drive & Sacramento Avenue - Provide second northbound left turn lane - Provide second eastbound through lane - Provide second westbound left turn lane • Jefferson Boulevard & West Capitol Avenue - Provide northbound right turn lane (providing two dedicated through lanes) • Jefferson Boulevard & lake Washington Boulevard - Provide second eastbound through lane • Jefferson Boulevard & Linden Road (north) - Provide second southbound left turn lane • Jefferson Boulevard & Marshall Road - Provide northbound dedicated through lane - Provide second southbound through lane - Provide dedicated eastbound left turn lane (resulting in through plus through-left) • Harbor Boulevard & Reed Avenue - Provide second eastbound right turn lane • Harbor Boulevard & Beacon Boulevard - Provide second northbound dedicated through lane (resulting in 2 through lanes plus through-right) • Harbor Boulevard & Del Monte Street - Provide second northbound dedicated through lane (resulting in 2 through lanes plus through-right) • Harbor Boulevard & Industrial Boulevard - Provide dedicated westbound left turn lane - Provide two westbound through lanes • Lake Washington Boulevard & Southport Parkway - Provide third northbound through lane - Provide third southbound through lane - Provide dedicated eastbound right turn lane

10 Bridge constructed as of December, 2014 11 Under construction as of 2016

63 • 5th Street & US 50 Westbound Ramps/ Bridge Street - Provide second southbound through lane • Interstate 80 Westbound Ramps & Reed Avenue - Provide second northbound right turn lane • Interstate 80 Eastbound Ramps & Reed Avenue - Provide third westbound through lane • Ikea Court/ Riverpoint Drive & Reed Avenue - Provide third eastbound through lane - Provide third westbound through lane

64 Figure 14: Assumed 2035 Roadway and Intersection Improvements

65 5.5. Impacts Intersections A level of service analysis was completed for each of the future year scenarios to determine project impacts in accordance with the City’s new policy as detailed in Section 4.2 of this report. Level of service analysis for the 2020 horizon is summarized in Table 25. The Impacts are summarized in Table 26 and listed below: 2020 Scenario Impacts • Jefferson Boulevard & Sacramento Avenue - P.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) • Jefferson Boulevard & Lake Washington Boulevard - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) and P.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) • Jefferson Boulevard & Linden Road North - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) and P.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) • Jefferson Boulevard & Marshall Road - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) • Harbor Boulevard & Industrial Boulevard - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) and P.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) It should be noted that one intersection (5th Street & Tower Bridge Gateway) would be recognized as a P.M. Peak hour impact under the old LOS policy (policy of LOS C for this intersection) but is no longer identified as an impact under the new LOS policy (policy of LOS E for this intersection). The level of service analysis for the 2035 horizon is summarized in Table 27. The Impacts are summarized in Table 28 and listed below: 2035 Scenario Impacts • Jefferson Boulevard & Sacramento Avenue - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) and P.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) • Jefferson Boulevard & Triangle Court/ F Street - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) and P.M. Peak Hour (LOS E) • Jefferson Boulevard & Park Boulevard/US 50 Westbound Ramp - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS F) and P.M. Peak Hour (LOS E) • Jefferson Boulevard & Lake Washington Boulevard - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) and P.M. Peak Hour (LOS E) • Jefferson Boulevard & Linden Road North - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) • Jefferson Boulevard & Higgins Road - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS D) • Lake Washington Boulevard & Southport Parkway - P.M. Peak hour (LOS D) • Riverfront Street/3rd Street & Tower Bridge Gateway - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS F) and P.M. Peak Hour (LOS F) • I-80 Eastbound Ramps & Reed Avenue - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS E) • 3rd Street & C Street - A.M. Peak Hour (LOS F) and P.M. Peak Hour (LOS F)

66 Table 25: Intersection Level of Service – 2020 Conditions

Existing Conditions 2020 Scenario Intersection LOS Policy A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Intersection Hour Hour Hour Hour Control Control Old New LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay

1 Jefferson Blvd/Kegle Dr & Sacramento Ave C Signal C 32.8 D 39.0 Signal C 29.5 D 41.9 2 Jefferson Blvd & Triangle Ct/F St C Signal A 6.6 B 19.0 Signal A 6.6 B 18.9 3 Jefferson Blvd & Michigan Blvd/Driveway C E Signal C 21.5 B 15.7 Signal C 21.5 B 16.0 4 Jefferson Blvd & West Capitol Ave D E Signal C 34.1 D 35.2 Signal C 34.1 D 35.4 5 Jefferson Blvd & Merkley Ave D E Signal D 49.1 D 47.0 Signal C 26.6 C 25.9 6 Jefferson Blvd & US 50 EB Off Ramp D E Signal A 8.5 B 11.8 Signal A 7.5 A 9.5 7 Jefferson Blvd & Park Blvd/US 50 WB Ramps D Signal E 56.5 D 36.9 Signal D 39.0 C 26.9 8 Jefferson Blvd & 15th St D E Signal C 20.5 C 34.1 Signal C 20.5 C 32.1 9 Jefferson Blvd & Stone Blvd D E Signal A 9.2 A 9.2 Signal A 9.2 A 8.7 10 Jefferson Blvd & S River Rd D Signal B 12.4 A 5.8 Signal B 11.1 A 5.4 11 Jefferson Blvd & Valley Oak Ln C Signal A 7.8 A 6.7 Signal A 8.0 A 6.9 12 Jefferson Blvd & Devon Ave/Gateway Dr C Signal C 20.3 A 9.5 Signal C 21.0 C 23.9 13 Jefferson Blvd & Lake Washington Blvd C Signal E 72.2 F 113.9 Signal D 39.2 D 49.2 14 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd North C Signal F 168.8 F 133.0 Signal D 42.3 D 43.4 15 Jefferson Blvd & Higgins Rd C Signal C 35.0 B 20.2 Signal C 35.0 B 19.8 16 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd South C Signal B 12.7 B 12.2 Signal B 12.7 B 12.1 17 Jefferson Blvd & Marshall Rd C Signal F 86.4 B 18.5 Signal D 45.9 B 18.3 18 Harbor Blvd/N Harbor Blvd & Reed Ave C Signal B 18.8 C 20.8 Signal B 18.8 C 21.2 19 Harbor Blvd & Riverpoint Ct C Signal A 8.7 B 11.1 Signal A 8.7 B 13.4 20 Harbor Blvd & Rice Ave C Signal A 9.4 B 10.5 Signal A 9.4 B 10.3 21 Harbor Blvd & Duluth St C Signal A 5.5 A 5.4 Signal A 5.5 A 5.3 22 Harbor Blvd & West Capitol Ave D E Signal B 16.8 C 20.8 Signal B 16.8 C 22.0 23 Harbor Blvd & Evergreen Ave D Signal C 20.3 C 22.9 Signal C 20.3 C 23.7 24 Harbor Blvd & US 50 WB Off-ramp D Signal A 7.3 A 7.1 Signal A 7.3 A 7.3 25 Harbor Blvd & EB US 50 Ramps D Signal A 6.6 C 25.1 Signal A 6.6 B 17.6 26 Harbor Blvd & Beacon Blvd D Signal B 11.6 C 21.1 Signal B 11.6 C 21.2 27 Harbor Blvd & Del Monte St D Signal C 21.3 B 15.5 Signal C 21.3 C 20.3 28 Harbor Blvd & Industrial Blvd C Signal E 79.8 D 40.2 Signal D 54.7 D 48.7 29 Terminal St & Industrial Blvd C Signal B 10.3 A 9.4 Signal B 10.3 B 10.2

67 Existing Conditions 2020 Scenario Intersection LOS Policy A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Intersection Hour Hour Hour Hour Control Control Old New LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay

30 Lake Washington Blvd & Southport Pkwy C Signal C 29.1 C 28.0 Signal C 29.1 C 33.4 31 Enterprise Blvd & Industrial Blvd D Signal B 15.1 C 23.3 Signal B 15.1 C 23.4 32 Enterprise Blvd & Lake Rd D Signal A 0.0 A 0.0 Signal A 0.0 A 3.7 33 Enterprise Blvd & I 80 EB Ramps D Signal B 11.0 B 12.6 Signal B 11.0 B 12.7 34 I 80 WB Ramps & West Capitol Ave D Signal B 17.0 A 9.0 Signal B 17.0 A 8.9 35 Poplar Ave & West Capitol Ave C E Signal A 6.5 A 5.8 Signal A 6.5 A 5.7 36 Westacre Rd & West Capitol Ave C E Signal B 14.4 B 13.5 Signal B 14.4 B 13.5 37 Merkley Ave & West Capitol Ave C E Signal A 8.4 A 8.5 Signal A 8.4 A 8.4 38 Garden St & West Capitol Ave C E Signal B 10.2 B 12.1 Signal B 10.2 B 12.3 39 5th St & Tower Bridge Gateway C E Signal C 31.3 D 35.8 Signal C 31.3 D 36.8 40 Riverfront St/3rd St & Tower Bridge Gateway D E Signal B 15.8 C 20.3 Signal B 15.8 C 22.1 41 Riske Ln/Garden St & Tower Bridge Gateway C E Signal B 13.9 B 13.5 Signal B 13.9 B 14.4 42 5th St & US 50 WB Ramps/Bridge St D E Signal A 8.4 A 7.4 Signal A 8.4 A 8.3 43 I 80 WB Ramps/Driveway & Reed Ave D C Signal B 11.9 B 14.7 Signal B 11.9 B 16.5 44 I 80 EB Ramps & Reed Ave D C Signal B 13.1 B 12.2 Signal B 13.1 C 31.4 45 Ikea Ct/Riverpoint Dr & Reed Ave D C Signal A 2.0 A 2.0 Signal A 2.0 C 22.2 46 Bryte Ave & Sacramento Ave C Signal B 11.9 B 11.2 Signal B 11.9 B 11.2 47 Sierra Pl/Todhunter Ave & Sacramento Ave C Signal B 13.1 B 10.7 Signal B 13.1 B 11.3 49 3rd Street & C Street D E Signal B 11.5 B 14.6 Signal B 11.9 B 16.2 61 Jefferson Blvd & Broadway Bridge Connection D E Future Year Only Future Year Only Note: LOS shaded in gray are intersections that do not meet LOS policy Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

68 Table 26: Intersections Exceeding Level of Service Policy – 2020 Conditions

Five Year Horizon Impact under LOS Policy Intersection LOS LOS Policy A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Intersection Hour Hour Hour Hour Control Old New Old New Old New LOS Delay LOS Delay Policy Policy Policy Policy 1 Jefferson Blvd/Kegle Dr & Sacramento Ave C Signal C 29.5 D 41.9 X X 13 Jefferson Blvd & Lake Washington Blvd C Signal D 39.2 D 49.2 X X X X 14 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd North C Signal D 42.3 D 43.4 X X X X 17 Jefferson Blvd & Marshall Rd C Signal D 45.9 B 18.3 X X 28 Harbor Blvd & Industrial Blvd C Signal D 54.7 D 48.7 X X X X 39 5th St & Tower Bridge Gateway C E Signal C 31.3 D No X 4 (Old Policy) 5 (Old Policy) Number of Intersections Not Meeting LOS Policy 4 (New 4 (New Policy) Policy) Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

69 Figure 15: 2020 Scenario Intersection LOS and Impacts

70 Table 27: Intersection Level of Service - 2035 Conditions

Existing Conditions 2035 Conditions Intersection LOS Policy A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Intersection Hour Hour Hour Hour Control Control Old New LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay

1 Jefferson Blvd/Kegle Dr & Sacramento Ave C Signal C 32.8 D 39.0 Signal D 39.3 D 43.1 2 Jefferson Blvd & Triangle Ct/F St C Signal A 6.6 B 19.0 Signal D 40.0 E 57.5 3 Jefferson Blvd & Michigan Blvd/Driveway C E Signal C 21.5 B 15.7 Signal B 16.9 C 20.3 4 Jefferson Blvd & West Capitol Ave D E Signal C 34.1 D 35.2 Signal D 54.4 D 53.8 5 Jefferson Blvd & Merkley Ave D E Signal D 49.1 D 47.0 Signal C 29.4 C 31.9 6 Jefferson Blvd & US 50 EB Off Ramp D E Signal A 8.5 B 11.8 Signal C 22.4 C 24.1 7 Jefferson Blvd & Park Blvd/US 50 WB Ramps D Signal E 56.5 D 36.9 Signal F 104.9 E 69.7 8 Jefferson Blvd & 15th St D E Signal C 20.5 C 34.1 Signal C 29.0 D 44.6 9 Jefferson Blvd & Stone Blvd D E Signal A 9.2 A 9.2 Signal A 9.7 B 13.5 10 Jefferson Blvd & S River Rd D Signal B 12.4 A 5.8 Signal B 10.3 A 9.4 11 Jefferson Blvd & Valley Oak Ln C Signal A 7.8 A 6.7 Signal A 6.9 A 8.7 12 Jefferson Blvd & Devon Ave/Gateway Dr C Signal C 20.3 A 9.5 Signal B 11.4 B 14.6 13 Jefferson Blvd & Lake Washington Blvd C Signal E 72.2 F 113.9 Signal D 49.6 E 65.2 14 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd North C Signal F 168.8 F 133.0 Signal D 41.8 C 31.2 15 Jefferson Blvd & Higgins Rd C Signal C 35.0 C 20.2 Signal D 44.1 C 20.0 16 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd South C Signal B 12.7 B 12.2 Signal B 12.8 B 12.7 17 Jefferson Blvd & Marshall Rd C Signal F 86.4 B 18.5 Signal C 22.8 B 11.2 18 Harbor Blvd/N Harbor Blvd & Reed Ave C Signal B 18.8 C 20.8 Signal C 24.8 C 29.9 19 Harbor Blvd & Riverpoint Ct C Signal A 8.7 B 11.1 Signal B 10.2 B 16.5 20 Harbor Blvd & Rice Ave C Signal A 9.4 B 10.5 Signal B 10.9 B 10.9 21 Harbor Blvd & Duluth St C Signal A 5.5 A 5.4 Signal A 5.2 A 5.5 22 Harbor Blvd & West Capitol Ave D E Signal B 16.8 C 20.8 Signal C 25.5 D 36.9 23 Harbor Blvd & Evergreen Ave D Signal C 20.3 C 22.9 Signal C 20.9 C 22.2 24 Harbor Blvd & US 50 WB Off-ramp D Signal A 7.3 A 7.1 Signal A 9.5 A 7.2 25 Harbor Blvd & EB US 50 Ramps D Signal A 6.6 C 25.1 Signal A 9.9 C 22.8 26 Harbor Blvd & Beacon Blvd D Signal B 11.6 C 21.1 Signal B 11.3 B 19.2 27 Harbor Blvd & Del Monte St D Signal C 21.3 B 15.5 Signal B 11.3 A 9.7 28 Harbor Blvd & Industrial Blvd C Signal E 79.8 D 40.2 Signal C 23.2 C 20.9 29 Terminal St & Industrial Blvd C Signal B 10.3 A 9.4 Signal A 8.7 B 10.9

71 Existing Conditions 2035 Conditions Intersection LOS Policy A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Intersection Hour Hour Hour Hour Control Control Old New LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay

30 Lake Washington Blvd & Southport Pkwy C Signal C 29.1 C 28.0 Signal C 27.7 D 37.9 31 Enterprise Blvd & Industrial Blvd D Signal B 15.1 C 23.3 Signal B 19.4 C 28.4 32 Enterprise Blvd & Lake Rd D Signal A 0.0 A 0.0 Signal B 10.1 B 10.3 33 Enterprise Blvd & I 80 EB Ramps D Signal B 11.0 B 12.6 Signal C 33.5 C 28.3 34 I 80 WB Ramps & West Capitol Ave D Signal B 17.0 A 9.0 Signal C 25.6 C 24.1 35 Poplar Ave & West Capitol Ave C E Signal A 6.5 A 5.8 Signal A 6.5 A 6.1 36 Westacre Rd & West Capitol Ave C E Signal B 14.4 B 13.5 Signal B 15.5 B 14.7 37 Merkley Ave & West Capitol Ave C E Signal A 8.4 A 8.5 Signal A 8.2 A 8.7 38 Garden St & West Capitol Ave C E Signal B 10.2 B 12.1 Signal C 28.3 B 18.8 39 5th St & Tower Bridge Gateway C E Signal C 31.3 D 35.8 Signal E 61.9 D 54.8 40 Riverfront St/3rd St & Tower Bridge Gateway D E Signal B 15.8 C 20.3 Signal F 175.0 F 267.5 41 Riske Ln/Garden St & Tower Bridge Gateway C E Signal B 13.9 B 13.5 Signal C 28.7 C 26.0 42 5th St & US 50 WB Ramps/Bridge St D E Signal A 8.4 A 7.4 Signal B 16.4 B 11.7 43 I 80 WB Ramps/Driveway & Reed Ave D Signal B 11.9 B 14.7 Signal C 33.5 D 45.4 44 I 80 EB Ramps & Reed Ave D Signal B 13.1 B 12.2 Signal E 61.2 C 27.2 45 Ikea Ct/Riverpoint Dr & Reed Ave D Signal A 2.0 A 2.0 Signal C 32.7 D 53.1 46 Bryte Ave & Sacramento Ave C Signal B 11.9 B 11.2 Signal B 14.1 B 19.3 47 Sierra Pl/Todhunter Ave & Sacramento Ave C Signal B 13.1 B 10.7 Signal B 17.2 B 17.1 49 3rd Street & C Street Signal B 11.5 B 14.6 Signal F * F * 61 Jefferson Blvd & Broadway Bridge Connection D E Future Year Only Signal D 39.4 C 25.4 Note: LOS shaded in gray are intersections that do not meet LOS policy *Exact operations dependent on final design of the new I Street Bridge Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

Table 28: Intersections Exceeding Level of Service Policy 2035 Conditions

2035 Conditions Impact Under LOS Policy Intersection LOS LOS Policy Intersection A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Hour Hour Hour Hour Control Old New Old New Old New LOS Delay LOS Delay Policy Policy Policy Policy 1 Jefferson Blvd/Kegle Dr & Sacramento Ave C Signal D 39.3 D 43.1 X X X X 2 Jefferson Blvd & Triangle Ct/F St C Signal D 40.0 E 57.5 X X X X Jefferson Blvd & Park Blvd/US 50 WB 7 D Signal F 104.9 E 69.7 X X X X Ramps 13 Jefferson Blvd & Lake Washington Blvd C Signal D 49.6 E 65.2 X X X X 14 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd North C Signal D 41.8 C 31.2 X X 15 Jefferson Blvd & Higgins Rd C Signal D 44.1 C 20.0 X X 30 Lake Washington Blvd & Southport Pkwy C Signal C 27.7 D 37.9 X X 39 5th St & Tower Bridge Gateway C E Signal E 61.9 D 54.8 X X Riverfront St/3rd St & Tower Bridge 40 D E Signal F 175.0 F 267.5 X X X X Gateway 44 I 80 EB Ramps & Reed Ave D Signal E 61.2 C 27.2 X X 49 3rd Street & C Street D E Signal F * F * X X X X 10 (Old Policy) 8 (Old Policy) Number of Intersections Not Meeting LOS Policy 9 (New Policy) 7 (New Policy)

*Exact operations dependent on final design of the new I Street Bridge Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

73 Figure 16: 2035 Intersection LOS and Impacts

74 Freeways Freeway mainline and ramp level of service has been analyzed utilizing methodologies from the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. Table 29 summarizes the results for the mainline analysis. Table 31 summarizes the results from the ramp analysis. Mainline segments projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service for both the five year horizon and 2035 scenario include: • I-80 westbound from US 50 Junction to West Capitol Avenue - A.M. Peak Hour • US 50 eastbound at the I-80 Junction - P.M. Peak Hour Ramps at an unacceptable level of service for both the 2020 horizon and 2035 scenario include: • I-80 eastbound Entrance from Enterprise Boulevard - P.M. Peak Hour • I-80 eastbound to eastbound US 50 - P.M. Peak Hour • I-80 westbound Entrance from I-80 westbound - P.M. Peak Hour • I-80 westbound Exit to West Capitol Avenue - P.M. Peak Hour • I-80 westbound Entrance from eastbound West Capitol Avenue - P.M. Peak Hour • I-80 westbound Entrance from westbound West Capitol Avenue - P.M. Peak Hour • US 50 eastbound Entrance from South River Road - A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour • US 50 westbound Exit to South River Road & Jefferson Boulevard - A.M. Peak Hour and P.M. Peak Hour Additional mainline segments at an unacceptable level of service for the 2035 scenario include: • I-80 eastbound from Mace Boulevard to Enterprise Boulevard - A.M. Peak Hour • US 50 eastbound from I-80 Junction to Harbor Boulevard - P.M. Peak Hour • US 50 eastbound between Jefferson Boulevard Ramps - P.M. Peak Hour • US 50 eastbound from South River Road to I-5 - P.M. Peak Hour Additional ramps at an unacceptable level of service for the 2035 scenario include: • I-80 westbound Entrance from eastbound West Capitol Avenue - A.M. Peak Hour • I-80 westbound Entrance from westbound West Capitol Avenue - A.M. Peak Hour

75 Table 29: Freeway Mainline Level of Service – 2035 A.M. Peak Hour

Existing 2020 2035 Number Level of Level of Level of Direction Segment of Lanes Volume Service Volume Service Volume Service Interstate 80 Eastbound Mace Boulevard to Enterprise Boulevard 3 5,028 D 5,048 D 6,866 F Enterprise Boulevard to US 50 Junction 6 5,306 B 5,346 B 7,496 C US 50 Junction to Reed Ave 3 2,576 B 2,640 B 3,891 C Reed Avenue to West El Camino Avenue 3 2,257 B 2,293 B 3,447 C Westbound West El Camino Avenue to Reed Avenue 3 4,315 D 4,454 D 5,971 E Reed Avenue to US 50 Junction 3 2,576 B 2,617 B 3,784 C US 50 Junction to West Capitol Avenue 5 4,445 F 6,460 F 7,637 F West Capitol Avenue to Mace Boulevard 3 5,594 D 5,570 D 5,941 E US 50 Eastbound I 80 Junction 4 4,467 C 4,468 C 5,524 D I 80 Junction to Harbor Boulevard 5 5,594 D 5,570 D 5,941 E Harbor Boulevard to Jefferson Boulevard Off 5 4,945 B 4,969 B 6,572 C Between Jefferson Boulevard Ramps 3 5,270 D 5,375 D 6,195 E South River Road to I 5 4 7,032 D 7,176 D 8,144 E Westbound I 5 to South River Road 4 4,326 C 4,552 C 6,961 D South River Road to Jefferson Boulevard On Ramp 3 3,285 C 3,754 C 4,594 D Jefferson Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard 4 3,555 B 3,754 B 4,594 C Harbor Boulevard to I 80 Junction 4 3,706 B 3,692 B 3,986 B I 80 Junction 4 2,563 B 4,926 C 5,063 C Note: LOS shaded in gray are intersections that do not meet LOS policy Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

76 Table 30: Freeway Mainline Level of Service – 2035 P.M. Peak Hour

Existing 2020 2035 Number Level of Level of Level of Direction Segment of Lanes Volume Service Volume Service Volume Service Interstate 80 Eastbound Mace Boulevard to Enterprise Boulevard 3 5,533 D 5,526 D 6,326 E Enterprise Boulevard to US 50 Junction 6 6,333 C 6,332 C 5,596 C US 50 Junction to Reed Ave 3 3,817 C 3,841 C 5,053 D Reed Avenue to West El Camino Avenue 3 4,081 C 4,173 C 5,776 E Westbound West El Camino Avenue to Reed Avenue 3 2,725 B 2,748 B 4,056 C Reed Avenue to US 50 Junction 3 3,817 C 3,838 C 5,125 D US 50 Junction to West Capitol Avenue 5 5,987 C 7,093 D 9,053 E West Capitol Avenue to Mace Boulevard 3 5,180 D 5,175 D 7,002 F US 50 Eastbound I 80 Junction 4 5,423 F 5,416 F 5,795 F I 80 Junction to Harbor Boulevard 5 5,180 D 5,175 D 7,002 F Harbor Boulevard to Jefferson Boulevard Off 5 5,559 B 5,698 B 7,003 C Between Jefferson Boulevard Ramps 3 5,848 E 6,088 E 7,480 F South River Road to I 5 4 6,815 D 6,981 D 9,003 F Westbound I 5 to South River Road 4 4,599 C 4,733 C 6,353 D South River Road to Jefferson Boulevard On Ramp 3 3,300 C 3,361 C 4,490 D Jefferson Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard 4 3,300 B 3,361 B 4,490 C Harbor Boulevard to I 80 Junction 4 3,930 C 3,947 C 5,348 C I 80 Junction 4 2,894 B 3,983 C 4,956 C Note: LOS shaded in gray are intersections that do not meet LOS policy Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

77 Table 31: Freeway Ramp Level of Service – 2035 A.M. Peak Hour

Existing 2020 2035 Direction Ramp Level of Ramp Level of Ramp Level of Ramp Junction Type Volume Service Volume Service Volume Service Interstate 80 Enterprise Boulevard Exit One-Lane Diverge 215 D 201 B 448 B Enterprise Boulevard Entrance 406 B 412 B 406 F Weave Eastbound I 80 to Eastbound US 50 1,586 B 1,624 B 2,719 F Eastbound Westbound US 50 Entrance Major Merge 1,143 B 1,168 B 1,324 C Reed Avenue Exit One-Lane Diverge 660 C 699 C 960 D Reed Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 368 B 381 B 544 B Reed Avenue Exit One-Lane Diverge 872 D 981 D 1,428 E Reed Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 281 B 292 B 389 C Eastbound US 50 Exit One-Lane Diverge 694 C 702 C 1,211 D Westbound Entrance from Westbound I 80 1,882 B 1,534 C 2,573 D Weave West Capitol Avenue Exit 560 B 582 C 1,245 D Eastbound West Capitol Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 195 B 198 C 436 F Westbound West Capitol Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 102 B 102 C 102 F US 50 Westbound I 80 Entrance 694 B 702 B 1,211 C Weave Harbor Boulevard Exit 734 B 779 B 897 C Harbor Boulevard Entrance 518 B 576 B 733 C Eastbound Jefferson Boulevard & Tower Bridge Weave Gateway Exit 193 B 171 B 1,110 C Jefferson Boulevard Entrance One-Lane Merge 1,572 D 1,658 D 1,868 F South River Road Entrance Weave 708 F 720 F 814 F South River Road & Jefferson Boulevard Exit Weave 1,041 F 1,115 F 3,082 F Tower Bridge Gateway & Jefferson Major Merge Boulevard Entrance 270 B 318 B 716 C Westbound Harbor Boulevard Exit Two-Lane Diverge 993 A 1,275 C 1,683 E Northbound Harbor Boulevard Entrance One-Lane Merge 574 B 601 B 469 B Southbound Harbor Boulevard Entrance 192 B 206 B 227 B Weave Eastbound I 80 Exit 1,143 B 1,168 B 1,324 B Note: LOS shaded in gray are intersections that do not meet LOS policy Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

78 Table 32: Freeway Ramp Level of Service – 2035 P.M. Peak Hour

Existing 2020 2035 Direction Ramp Level of Ramp Level of Ramp Level of Ramp Junction Type Volume Service Volume Service Volume Service Interstate 80 Enterprise Boulevard Exit One-Lane Diverge 284 A 286 A 492 A Enterprise Boulevard Entrance 861 F 869 F 861 F Weave Eastbound I 80 to Eastbound US 50 2,668 F 2,673 F 3,458 F Eastbound Westbound US 50 Entrance Major Merge 1,036 C 1,053 C 1,481 D Reed Avenue Exit One-Lane Diverge 520 C 530 C 589 D Reed Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 789 C 868 C 1,317 D Reed Avenue Exit One-Lane Diverge 549 C 567 C 900 D Reed Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 772 B 789 B 1,102 C Eastbound US 50 Exit One-Lane Diverge 724 D 729 D 1,029 E Westbound Entrance from Westbound I 80 3,093 C 3,110 F 4,097 F Weave West Capitol Avenue Exit 299 C 304 F 837 F Eastbound West Capitol Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 166 C 162 F 563 F Westbound West Capitol Avenue Entrance One-Lane Merge 164 C 164 F 164 F US 50 Westbound I 80 Entrance 724 C 729 C 1,030 C Weave Harbor Boulevard Exit 651 C 667 C 574 C Harbor Boulevard Entrance 632 C 788 C 1,320 D Eastbound Jefferson Boulevard & Tower Bridge Weave Gateway Exit 343 C 398 C 842 D Jefferson Boulevard Entrance One-Lane Merge 973 E 1,008 E 2,017 E South River Road Entrance Weave 626 F 662 F 815 F South River Road & Jefferson Boulevard Exit Weave 1,732 F 1,810 F 2,999 F Tower Bridge Gateway & Jefferson Major Merge Boulevard Entrance 432 B 439 B 1,171 C Westbound Harbor Boulevard Exit Two-Lane Diverge 859 E 793 E 931 E Northbound Harbor Boulevard Entrance One-Lane Merge 380 B 413 B 467 B Southbound Harbor Boulevard Entrance 220 B 214 B 419 B Weave Eastbound I 80 Exit 1,036 B 1,053 B 1,481 B Note: LOS shaded in gray are intersections that do not meet LOS policy Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

79 Roadway Segments Although the updated Level of Service policy is focused on intersection operations and no longer relies upon roadway segment level of service, segment analysis is a valuable tool to identify roadway segments that may need widening. The City has established guidelines for the maximum desirable volume on a roadway segment based on the number of travel lanes and its type and its location (see Table 2). For an arterial or non-residential collector roadway segment that exceeds the “maximum desirable daily volume”, a detailed analysis is required to determine if that segment should be widened to accommodate additional travel lanes, including intersection LOS analysis and determining the logical segment that should be widened. The evaluation of residential roadway segments is discussed in the following subsection.

As part of this General Plan Update, the City is modifying its LOS policy, including allowing LOS E conditions in its urbanizing areas. For this reason, a higher roadway segment volume is required in the urbanizing areas than other areas of the City to identify segments where studies are required to determine if additional travel lanes are needed.

Table 33 compares the 2020 scenario daily volumes with existing conditions and to the maximum desirable daily volumes identified in Table 2. The following arterial roadway segments exceed the maximum desirable daily volume under the 2020 horizon: • Jefferson Boulevard from US 50 EB Ramps to 15th Street; • Jefferson Boulevard from Stone Boulevard to Washington Boulevard; • Jefferson Boulevard from Linden Road (South) to Davis Road; • Harbor Boulevard from US 50 Eastbound Ramps to Industrial Boulevard Table 34 compares the 2035 scenario daily volumes with existing conditions and to the maximum desirable daily volumes in Table 2. The following arterial roadway segments exceed the maximum desirable daily volume under 2035 conditions: • C Street from 5th Street to 3rd Street • Enterprise Boulevard from Industrial Boulevard to Channel Drive • Harbor Boulevard from Rice Avenue to West Capitol Avenue • Jefferson Boulevard from US 50 Eastbound Ramps to Lake Washington Boulevard • Sacramento Avenue from Jefferson Boulevard/ Kegle Drive to 6th Street • 15th Street from Jefferson Boulevard to South River Road • Enterprise Boulevard from I-80 eastbound ramps to Industrial Boulevard

80 Residential Streets As stated in Section 4.1, the City of West Sacramento specifically considers growth on residential streets (local and collector streets) when determining impacts. No residential streets are impacted by growth assumed for the 2020 scenario. As shown in Table 33, the following residential collector roadway is impacted under 2020 conditions because it would exceed the maximum desirable daily volume for residential streets:

• Kegle Drive from Anna Street to Sacramento Avenue. A number of residential roadways are impacted by volume growth under 2035 conditions. As shown in Table 34, the following residential collector roadway segments exceed maximum desirable daily volume thresholds or exceed maximum desirable growth between existing and 2035 conditions:

• Carlin Drive from Oates Drive to Ramco Street • Davis Road from Jefferson Boulevard to South River Road • F Street from Jefferson Boulevard to 2nd Street • Golden Gate Drive from Oakland Bay Drive to Marshall Road • Kegle Drive from Anna Street to Sacramento Avenue • Michigan Boulevard from Portsmouth Avenue to Jefferson Boulevard • Park Boulevard from Jefferson Boulevard to Stone Boulevard • Promenade Way from Ramos Drive to Golden Gate Drive • Riverbank Boulevard from North Harbor Road to Bryte Avenue • Stone Boulevard from Industrial Boulevard to Jefferson Parkway • Sunset Avenue from North Harbor Boulevard to Sacramento Avenue • Todhunter Avenue from Anna Street to Sacramento Avenue • 3rd Street from B Street to Tower Bridge Gateway • 6th Street from Cummins Way to C Street

81 Table 33: Roadway Segment Volumes - 2020 Conditions

Existing 2020 Horizon Conditions Segment Roadway Facility Type Travel Daily Travel Volume Daily Lanes Volume Lanes Change Volume From To Anna St Bryte Ave Kegle Dr Res Collector F 2 1,613 2 -17 1,596 Bryte Ave Riverbank Rd Sacramento Ave Res Collector F 2 4,057 2 -7 4,050 C St 5th St 3rd St Arterial M 2 10,793 2 341 11,134 Carlin Dr Oates Dr Ramco St Res Collector NF 2 1,597 2 11 1,608 Carrie St Bryte Ave Kegle Dr Res Collector F 2 1,312 2 9 1,321 Cummins Way Kegle Dr 6th St Res Collector F 2 1,483 2 17 1,500 Davis Rd Jefferson Blvd Antioch Ave Res Collector F 2 213 2 -60 153 Davis Rd Antioch Ave South River Rd Res Collector F 2 315 2 -28 287 Del Monte St Harbor Blvd Cebrian St Arterial L 2 4,707 4 135 4,842 Enterprise Blvd Industrial Blvd Seaport Blvd Arterial L 4 12,404 4 -51 12,353 Enterprise Blvd Seaport Blvd Channel Dr Arterial M 2 5,483 2 -31 5,452 Evergreen Ave Pine St Harbor Blvd Arterial L 2 3,108 2 18 3,126 Evergreen Ave Harbor Blvd Coke St Arterial L 2 5,335 2 15 5,350 F St Jefferson Blvd 8th St Res Collector F 2 3,951 2 194 4,145 F St 8th St 2nd St Res Collector F 2 1,612 2 64 1,676 Golden Gate Dr Oakland Bay Dr Promenade St Res Collector NF 2 528 2 -63 465 Golden Gate Dr Promenade St Marshall Rd Res Collector NF 2 1,757 2 210 1,967 Gregory Ave Jefferson Blvd Bevan Rd Rural S 2 1,164 2 17 1,181 Gregory Ave Bevan Rd South River Rd Rural S 2 1,046 2 3 1,049 Harbor Blvd Rice Ave West Capitol Ave Arterial L 4 17,236 4 3,105 20,341 Harbor Blvd Reed Ave Rice Ave Arterial H 4 19,913 4 3,208 23,121 Harbor Blvd West Capitol Ave Evergreen Ave Arterial M 4 20,437 4 3,079 23,516 Higgins Rd Linden Rd Hart Ave Res Collector F 2 1,542 2 1 1,543 Higgins Rd Hart Ave Jefferson Blvd Res Collector F 2 2,646 2 2 2,648 Industrial Blvd Enterprise Blvd Parkway Blvd Arterial M 4 8,174 4 -8 8,166 Industrial Blvd Parkway Blvd Harbor Blvd Arterial M 4 8,156 4 -6 8,150 Industrial Blvd Harbor Blvd Stone Blvd Arterial M 4 22,728 4 2,538 25,266 Jefferson Blvd Sacramento Ave West Capitol Ave Arterial M 4 19,413 4 213 19,626 Jefferson Blvd US 50 EB Ramp 15th St Arterial M 4 30,460 4 645 31,105 Jefferson Blvd 15th St Stone Blvd Arterial M 4 34,960 4 128 35,088

82 Existing 2020 Horizon Conditions Segment Roadway Facility Type Travel Daily Travel Volume Daily Lanes Volume Lanes Change Volume From To Jefferson Blvd Stone Blvd Washington Blvd Arterial H 4 35,053 4 1,432 36,485 Jefferson Blvd Lake Washington Blvd Linden Rd (South) Arterial M 4 20,068 4 293 20,361 Jefferson Blvd Linden Rd (South) Davis Rd Arterial L 2 15,040 2 273 15,313 Jefferson Blvd Davis Rd Southport Parkway Arterial M 2 4,014 2 319 4,333 Jefferson Blvd Southport Parkway City Limits (South) Rural Hwy 2 1,695 2 1 1,696 Kegle Dr Carrie St Anna St Res Collector NF 2 2,578 2 -21 2,557 Kegle Dr Anna St Sacramento Ave Res Collector F 2 8,696 2 42 8,738 Lake Washington Blvd Stone Blvd Southport Parkway Arterial H 4 21,450 4 2,667 24,117 Lake Washington Blvd Jefferson Blvd Stonegate Dr Arterial M 4 8,652 4 513 9,165 Lake Washington Blvd Stonegate Dr Village Parkway Arterial M 2 2,192 2 4 2,196 Lighthouse Dr Fountain Dr A St Arterial H 4 2,974 4 228 3,202 Lighthouse Dr Kegle Dr Fountain Dr Res Collector F 2 1,790 2 -14 1,776 Linden Rd (North) Summerfield Dr Jefferson Blvd Arterial M 4 6,745 4 6 6,751 Linden Rd (South) Sumerfield Dr Jefferson Blvd Arterial M 4 2,273 4 6 2,279 Linden Rd (East) Jefferson Blvd Stonegate Dr Arterial M 2 5,551 2 323 5,874 Linden Rd (East) Stonegate Dr Alder Way Arterial M 2 1,743 2 2 1,745 Linden Rd (East) Alder Way South River Rd Arterial M 2 667 2 31 698 Marshall Rd Golden Gate Dr Jefferson Blvd Res Collector NF 2 7,255 2 17 7,272 Marshall Rd Marshall Rd (westend) Golden Gate Dr Res Collector NF 2 4,279 2 -156 4,123 Merkley Ave Sycamore St Westacre Rd Res Collector F 2 1,799 2 -8 1,791 Merkley Ave Westacre Rd Jefferson Blvd Res Collector F 2 4,500 2 12 4,512 Michigan Blvd Pecan St Portsmouth Ave Res Collector F 2 2,409 2 -2 2,407 Michigan Blvd Portsmouth Ave Jefferson Blvd Res Collector F 2 1,724 2 14 1,738 North Harbor Blvd Riverbank Rd Reed Ave Arterial L 2 3,784 2 126 3,910 North Harbor Blvd City Limits Riverbank Rd Arterial H 2 3,472 2 142 3,614 Oakland Bay Dr Southport Parkway Golden Gate Dr (East) Res Collector NF 2 1,329 2 20 1,349 Park Blvd Jefferson Blvd 15th St Res Collector F 2 4,025 2 -72 3,953 Park Blvd 15th St Stone Blvd Res Collector F 2 4,030 2 -64 3,966 Promenade Way Ramos Dr Golden Gate Dr Res Collector F 2 4,588 2 -118 4,470 Riverbank Rd North Harbor Rd Bryte Ave Res Collector F 2 957 2 -5 952 Sacramento Ave Sunset Ave Kegle Dr Arterial M 4 15,553 4 646 16,199 Sacramento Ave Kegle Dr 6th St Arterial M 2 8,124 2 327 8,451

83 Existing 2020 Horizon Conditions Segment Roadway Facility Type Travel Daily Travel Volume Daily Lanes Volume Lanes Change Volume From To South River Rd Tower Bridge Gateway Bridge St Arterial L 4 1,497 4 699 2,196 South River Rd US 50 EB Ramp 15th St Res Collector NF 2 8,418 2 774 9,192 South River Rd 15th St END (South) Res Collector F 2 2,103 2 1,310 3,413 South River Rd Jefferson Blvd Linden Rd Res Collector NF 2 172 2 1,339 1,511 South River Rd Linden Rd Davis Rd Res Collector NF 2 234 2 59 293 South River Rd Gregory Ave City Limits Res Collector NF 2 889 2 2 891 Southport Parkway Ramco St Lake Washington Blvd Arterial H 4 16,306 4 2,224 18,530 Southport Parkway Promenade St Ramco St Arterial H 4 11,342 4 1,093 12,435 Southport Parkway Marshall Rd Promenade St Arterial H 4 4,908 4 302 5,210 Southport Parkway Jefferson Blvd Marshall Rd Arterial M 2 2,497 2 74 2,571 Stone Blvd Industrial Blvd Jefferson Parkway Res Collector F 2 2,459 2 33 2,492 Stonegate Dr Lake Washington Blvd Village Parkway Res Collector NF 2 2,805 2 -4 2,801 Sunset Ave North Harbor Blvd Sacramento Ave Res Collector F 2 1,847 2 20 1,867 Sycamore St West Capitol Ave Evergreen Ave Res Collector F 2 2,048 2 2 2,050 Terminal St Del Monte St Industrial Blvd Res Collector F 2 2,340 2 80 2,420 Todhunter Ave Anna St Sacramento Ave Res Collector F 2 2,604 2 35 2,639 West Capitol Ave I 80 WB Ramps Northport Dr Arterial L 3 5,403 4 -9 5,394 West Capitol Ave Northport Dr Harbor Blvd Arterial L 2 8,194 2 208 8,402 West Capitol Ave Harbor Blvd Sycamore St Arterial L 4 12,581 4 116 12,697 West Capitol Ave Sycamore St Jefferson Blvd Arterial M 6 11,185 6 7 11,192 West Capitol Ave Jefferson Blvd Garden St Arterial M 4 4,992 4 293 5,285 West Capitol Ave Garden St 3rd St Arterial M 2 2,411 2 436 2,847 Westacre Rd Michigan Blvd West Capitol Ave Res Collector F 2 2,622 2 -15 2,607 3rd St B St Tower Bridge Gateway Res Collector F 2 2,463 2 221 2,684 5th St A St West Capitol Ave Arterial L 4 7,181 4 296 7,477 6th St Cummins Way C St Res Collector F 2 1,751 2 -15 1,736 15th St Jefferson Blvd South River Rd Arterial L 2 7,496 2 -561 6,935 Tower Bridge Gateway Flyover Garden St. EB Arterial H 4 8,443 2 273 8,716 Tower Bridge Gateway Flyover Garden St. WB Arterial H 4 8,443 2 259 8,702 South River Rd Bridge St US 50 EB Ramp Arterial L 2 7,907 2 990 8,897 Jefferson Blvd West Capitol Ave US 50 WB Ramp Arterial M 4 20,322 4 161 20,483 Harbor Blvd US 50 EB Ramps Industrial Blvd Arterial M 4 41,544 6 2,485 44,029

84 Existing 2020 Horizon Conditions Segment Roadway Facility Type Travel Daily Travel Volume Daily Lanes Volume Lanes Change Volume From To Enterprise Blvd I 80 EB Ramps Industrial Blvd Arterial M 4 20,490 4 -126 20,364 Reed Ave West End I 80 WB Ramps Arterial M 2 6,392 2 192 6,584 Lake Washington Blvd Southport Parkway Jefferson Blvd Arterial M 4 17,829 4 1,056 18,885 Westacre Rd West Capitol Ave Park Blvd Res Collector F 2 5,887 2 46 5,933 Reed Ave I 80 EB Ramps Sunset Ave Arterial M 4 25,459 4 846 26,305 Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

Volumes shaded in gray denotes roadway segment that exceeds maximum desirable daily volume (see Table 2)

The following classifications are used to determine daily roadway capacity: Arterial L - Arterial, Low Access Control Arterial M - Arterial, Moderate Access Control Arterial H - Arterial, High Access Control Rural Hwy - Rural 2-lane Highway Rural S - Rural 2-lane Road, 24'-36' of pavement, Paved Shoulders Rural NS - Rural 2-lane Road, 24'-36' of pavement, No Shoulders Res Collector F - Residential Collector with Frontage Res Collector NF - Residential Collector with No Frontage

85 Table 34: Roadway Segment Volumes, 2035 Conditions

Existing 2035 Horizon Conditions Segment Roadway Facility Type Travel Daily Travel Volume Daily Lanes Volume Lanes Change Volume From To Anna St Bryte Ave Kegle Dr Res Collector F 2 1,613 2 23 1,636 Bryte Ave Riverbank Rd Sacramento Ave Res Collector F 2 4,057 2 279 4,336 C St 5th St 3rd St Arterial M 2 10,793 2 19,321 30,114 Carlin Dr Oates Dr Ramco St Res Collector NF 2 1,597 2 1,445 3,042 Carrie St Bryte Ave Kegle Dr Res Collector F 2 1,312 2 71 1,383 Cummins Way Kegle Dr 6th St Res Collector F 2 1,483 2 540 2,023 Davis Rd Jefferson Blvd Antioch Ave Res Collector F 2 213 2 242 455 Davis Rd Antioch Ave South River Rd Res Collector F 2 315 21 1,750 2,065 Del Monte St Harbor Blvd Cebrian St Arterial L 2 4,707 4 -677 4,030 Enterprise Blvd Industrial Blvd Seaport Blvd Arterial L 4 12,404 4 19,020 31,424 Enterprise Blvd Seaport Blvd Channel Dr Arterial M 2 5,483 2 19,530 25,013 Evergreen Ave Pine St Harbor Blvd Arterial L 2 3,108 2 34 3,142 Evergreen Ave Harbor Blvd Coke St Arterial L 2 5,335 2 103 5,438 F St Jefferson Blvd 8th St Res Collector F 2 3,951 2 3,020 6,971 F St 8th St 2nd St Res Collector F 2 1,612 2 4,357 5,969 Golden Gate Dr Oakland Bay Dr Promenade St Res Collector NF 2 528 2 355 883 Golden Gate Dr Promenade St Marshall Rd Res Collector NF 2 1,757 2 990 2,747 Gregory Ave Jefferson Blvd Bevan Rd Rural S 2 1,164 2 -94 1,070 Gregory Ave Bevan Rd South River Rd Rural S 2 1,046 2 103 1,149 Harbor Blvd Rice Ave West Capitol Ave Arterial L 4 17,236 4 7,966 25,202 Harbor Blvd Reed Ave Rice Ave Arterial H 4 19,913 4 8,372 28,285 Harbor Blvd West Capitol Ave Evergreen Ave Arterial M 4 20,437 6 7,948 28,385 Higgins Rd Linden Rd Hart Ave Res Collector F 2 1,542 2 127 1,669 Higgins Rd Hart Ave Jefferson Blvd Res Collector F 2 2,646 2 129 2,775 Industrial Blvd Enterprise Blvd Parkway Blvd Arterial M 4 8,174 4 101 8,275 Industrial Blvd Parkway Blvd Harbor Blvd Arterial M 4 8,156 4 -72 8,084 Industrial Blvd Harbor Blvd Stone Blvd Arterial M 4 22,728 4 5,995 28,723 Jefferson Blvd Sacramento Ave West Capitol Ave Arterial M 4 19,413 4 9,367 28,780 Jefferson Blvd US 50 EB Ramp 15th St Arterial M 4 30,460 4 3,778 34,238 Jefferson Blvd 15th St Stone Blvd Arterial M 4 34,960 4 6,885 41,845

86 Existing 2035 Horizon Conditions Segment Roadway Facility Type Travel Daily Travel Volume Daily Lanes Volume Lanes Change Volume From To Jefferson Blvd Stone Blvd Washington Blvd Arterial H 4 35,053 4 7,825 42,878 Jefferson Blvd Lake Washington Blvd Linden Rd (South) Arterial M 4 20,068 4 3,147 23,215 Jefferson Blvd Linden Rd (South) Davis Rd Arterial L 2 15,040 4 3,026 18,066 Jefferson Blvd Davis Rd Southport Parkway Arterial M 2 4,014 2 4,019 8,033 Jefferson Blvd Southport Parkway City Limits (South) Rural Hwy 2 1,695 2 1,296 2,991 Kegle Dr Carrie St Anna St Res Collector NF 2 2,578 2 87 2,665 Kegle Dr Anna St Sacramento Ave Res Collector F 2 8,696 2 1,913 10,609 Lake Washington Blvd Stone Blvd Southport Parkway Arterial H 4 21,450 4 6,840 28,290 Lake Washington Blvd Jefferson Blvd Stonegate Dr Arterial M 4 8,652 4 -829 7,823 Lake Washington Blvd Stonegate Dr Village Parkway Arterial M 2 2,192 2 2,722 4,914 Lighthouse Dr Fountain Dr A St Arterial H 4 2,974 4 5,343 8,317 Lighthouse Dr Kegle Dr Fountain Dr Res Collector F 2 1,790 2 337 2,127 Linden Rd (North) Summerfield Dr Jefferson Blvd Arterial M 4 6,745 4 33 6,778 Linden Rd (South) Sumerfield Dr Jefferson Blvd Arterial M 4 2,273 4 36 2,309 Linden Rd (East) Jefferson Blvd Stonegate Dr Arterial M 2 5,551 2 2,306 7,857 Linden Rd (East) Stonegate Dr Alder Way Arterial M 2 1,743 2 156 1,899 Linden Rd (East) Alder Way South River Rd Arterial M 2 667 2 1,150 1,817 Marshall Rd Golden Gate Dr Jefferson Blvd Res Collector NF 2 7,255 2 -1,125 6,130 Marshall Rd Marshall Rd (westend) Golden Gate Dr Res Collector NF 2 4,279 2 -1,216 3,063 Merkley Ave Sycamore St Westacre Rd Res Collector F 2 1,799 2 23 1,822 Merkley Ave Westacre Rd Jefferson Blvd Res Collector F 2 4,500 2 98 4,598 Michigan Blvd Pecan St Portsmouth Ave Res Collector F 2 2,409 2 27 2,436 Michigan Blvd Portsmouth Ave Jefferson Blvd Res Collector F 2 1,724 2 816 2,540 North Harbor Blvd Riverbank Rd Reed Ave Arterial L 2 3,784 2 3,205 6,989 North Harbor Blvd City Limits Riverbank Rd Arterial H 2 3,472 2 2,891 6,363 Oakland Bay Dr Southport Parkway Golden Gate Dr (East) Res Collector NF 2 1,329 2 131 1,460 Park Blvd Jefferson Blvd 15th St Res Collector F 2 4,025 2 1,436 5,461 Park Blvd 15th St Stone Blvd Res Collector F 2 4,030 2 2,176 6,206 Promenade Way Ramos Dr Golden Gate Dr Res Collector F 2 4,588 2 932 5,520 Riverbank Rd North Harbor Rd Bryte Ave Res Collector F 2 957 2 370 1,327 Sacramento Ave Sunset Ave Kegle Dr Arterial M 4 15,553 4 12,181 27,734 Sacramento Ave Kegle Dr 6th St Arterial M 2 8,124 2 6,600 14,724

87 Existing 2035 Horizon Conditions Segment Roadway Facility Type Travel Daily Travel Volume Daily Lanes Volume Lanes Change Volume From To South River Rd Tower Bridge Gateway Bridge St Arterial L 4 1,497 4 16,734 18,231 South River Rd US 50 EB Ramp 15th St Res Collector NF 2 8,418 42 25,953 34,371 South River Rd 15th St END (South) Res Collector F 2 2,103 42 30,810 32,913 South River Rd Jefferson Blvd Linden Rd Res Collector NF 2 172 42 14,078 14,250 South River Rd Linden Rd Davis Rd Res Collector NF 2 234 21 2,565 2,799 South River Rd Gregory Ave City Limits Res Collector NF 2 889 21 107 996 Southport Parkway Ramco St Lake Washington Blvd Arterial H 4 16,306 4 4,463 20,769 Southport Parkway Promenade St Ramco St Arterial H 4 11,342 4 12,133 23,475 Southport Parkway Marshall Rd Promenade St Arterial H 4 4,908 4 4,780 9,688 Southport Parkway Jefferson Blvd Marshall Rd Arterial M 2 2,497 2 2,720 5,217 Stone Blvd Industrial Blvd Jefferson Parkway Res Collector F 2 2,459 2 1,957 4,416 Stonegate Dr Lake Washington Blvd Village Parkway Res Collector NF 2 2,805 2 83 2,888 Sunset Ave North Harbor Blvd Sacramento Ave Res Collector F 2 1,847 2 723 2,570 Sycamore St West Capitol Ave Evergreen Ave Res Collector F 2 2,048 2 512 2,560 Terminal St Del Monte St Industrial Blvd Res Collector F 2 2,340 2 361 2,701 Todhunter Ave Anna St Sacramento Ave Res Collector F 2 2,604 2 1,397 4,001 West Capitol Ave I 80 WB Ramps Northport Dr Arterial L 3 5,403 4 1,496 6,899 West Capitol Ave Northport Dr Harbor Blvd Arterial L 2 8,194 4 1,209 9,403 West Capitol Ave Harbor Blvd Sycamore St Arterial L 4 12,581 4 3,513 16,094 West Capitol Ave Sycamore St Jefferson Blvd Arterial M 6 11,185 6 5,205 16,390 West Capitol Ave Jefferson Blvd Garden St Arterial M 4 4,992 4 11,091 16,083 West Capitol Ave Garden St 3rd St Arterial M 2 2,411 4 7,225 9,636 Westacre Rd Michigan Blvd West Capitol Ave Res Collector F 2 2,622 2 526 3,148 3rd St B St Tower Bridge Gateway Res Collector F 2 2,463 2 19,760 22,223 5th St A St West Capitol Ave Arterial L 4 7,181 4 14,719 21,900 6th St Cummins Way C St Res Collector F 2 1,751 2 1,531 3,282 15th St Jefferson Blvd South River Rd Arterial L 2 7,496 4 3,579 11,075 Tower Bridge Gateway Flyover Garden St. EB Arterial H 4 8,443 4 3,115 11,558 Tower Bridge Gateway Flyover Garden St. WB Arterial H 4 8,443 4 7,726 16,169 South River Rd Bridge St US 50 EB Ramp Arterial L 2 7,907 4 19,047 26,954 Jefferson Blvd West Capitol Ave US 50 WB Ramp Arterial M 4 20,322 4 6,562 26,884 Harbor Blvd US 50 EB Ramps Industrial Blvd Arterial M 4 41,544 6 6,332 47,876

88 Existing 2035 Horizon Conditions Segment Roadway Facility Type Travel Daily Travel Volume Daily Lanes Volume Lanes Change Volume From To Enterprise Blvd I 80 EB Ramps Industrial Blvd Arterial M 4 20,490 4 18,776 39,266 Reed Ave West End I 80 WB Ramps Arterial M 2 6,392 2 1,497 7,889 Lake Washington Blvd Southport Parkway Jefferson Blvd Arterial M 4 17,829 6 9,887 27,716 Westacre Rd West Capitol Ave Park Blvd Res Collector F 2 5,887 2 972 6,859 Reed Ave I 80 EB Ramps Sunset Ave Arterial M 4 25,459 6 14,905 40,364 Source: DKS Associates, 2015.

Volumes shaded in gray denotes roadway segment that exceeds maximum desirable daily volume (see Table 2) Volumes shaded in brown denotes roadway segment that exceeds neighborhood growth impact guidelines (see Section 4.1on page 49)

1Future classification upgraded to Arterial L 2Future classification upgraded to Arterial M

89 Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation The Mobility Element of the 2035 General Plan is focused on promoting, improving, and facilitating non- auto transportation. The proposed Mobility Element contains policies supporting the expansion and maintenance of facilities and services related to bicycle and pedestrian modes. In addition, the Land Use and Mobility Elements of the General Plan have been designed to complement one another to create compact and mixed-use development areas that support walking, bicycling, and service by transit.

Policies in the General Plan require new development to construct bicycle and pedestrian improvements and by 2035 a significant portion of the facilities defined in the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Path Master Plan will be implemented. A review of the proposed Mobility Element of the 2035 General Plan did not reveal potential inconsistencies with other policies, plans, or programs supporting the provision of bicycle, pedestrian facilities or services.

It is not anticipated that the General Plan would cause any existing or planned bikeway or pedestrian facility to be adversely affected such that access and/or usage of the facility is discouraged or conflicts are created. Thus the impacts of the proposed General Plan on bicycle and pedestrian circulation would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Public Transportation Transit service within the City is provided by Yolobus. The analysis of General Plan Update assumes the transit service improvements in SACOG’s MTP/SCS by 2035, which includes construction of a streetcar line and a substantial increase in bus service.

It is not anticipated that the General Plan would adversely affect public transit operations or access to public transit services. Thus the impacts of the proposed General Plan on public transportation would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 5.6. Mitigations Intersections As detailed in Section 5.5, there are five intersections in the 2020 year horizon and ten intersections in 2035 horizon that do not meet the City’s level of service policy. An analysis was conducted to determine potential mitigation measures that could provide an acceptable LOS, which is summarized in Table 35 and Table 36. Alternative designs might also provide an acceptable LOS, but the measures in Table 35 and Table 36 are representative of the level of improvement required.

As detailed in Table 35, three of the five impacted intersections in the 2020 year horizon could be mitigated with improvements assumed to be in place for the 2035 horizon year. For the remaining two intersections, the 2035 assumed improvements would lessen the severity of the impact, but full mitigation would not be feasible by the 2020 horizon year. Therefore, the LOS impacts at these two intersections would be significant and unavoidable.

At most locations, a high level of at-grade improvements (i.e. additional through lanes or turn lanes) could provide an acceptable LOS in the 2035 horizon. However, there is constrained right-of-way at these intersections and the high level of at-grade improvements outlined in Table 36 would have an unacceptable impact on adjacent uses. At some locations the at-grade improvements would require a roadway width or traffic control that is not acceptable due to its impact on pedestrians and bicyclists. At two intersections, grade-separating two or more of the “critical movement” traffic flows at an intersection would be needed to provide an acceptable LOS. However, grade separations require significant right-of-

90 way and would thus impact adjacent uses. Grade separations would also impact access to adjacent uses and pedestrians and bicyclists flows.

For the above reasons, the level of mitigation outlined for all the intersections in Table 36 would have significant impacts in 2035 and would not be feasible. Therefore, the LOS impacts at these intersections would be significant and unavoidable. Table 35: Level of Mitigation Required at Intersections with LOS Impacts in 2020

2020 LOS (peak hour) Intersection AM PM Level of Mitigation Required Mitigated by improvements assumed in the 2035 horizon year Jefferson Blvd & Second northbound left turn lane, second eastbound through D 1 Kegle Dr/Sacramento Ave lane, and second westbound left turn lane Jefferson Blvd & Second northbound and southbound through lanes and second 17 D Marshall Rd eastbound left turn lane Harbor Blvd & Industrial Westbound left turn pocket and additional westbound through 28 D D Blvd lane Improvements assumed in 2035 horizon year would lessen severity of impact Jefferson Blvd & Second eastbound through lane 13 D D Lake Washington Blvd Jefferson Blvd & Second southbound left turn lane 14 D D Linden Rd North Source: DKS Associates, 2015

Table 36: Level of Mitigation Required at Intersections with LOS Impacts in 2035

2035 LOS (peak hour) Level of Mitigation Required Intersection AM PM (Assumed infeasible due to impacts on adjacent uses) Jefferson Blvd & Additional Southbound through lanes and right turn pockets D D 1 Kegle Dr/Sacramento Ave where there are shared movement lanes Jefferson Blvd & Eastbound and westbound left turn pockets 2 D E Triangle Ct/ F St Jefferson Blvd & Dual northbound right turn lanes, Dual westbound right turn 7 F E Park Blvd/US 50 Ramp lanes, eastbound right turn pocket, rework of signal control Jefferson Blvd & Grade separate critical movements 13 D E Lake Washington Blvd Jefferson Blvd & Additional through lanes on Jefferson Blvd and additional 14 D Linden Rd North westbound right turn lane with protect + overlap phasing Jefferson Blvd & Rework school site access 15 D Higgins Rd Lake Washington Blvd & Additional northbound left turn lane and additional eastbound 30 D Southport Pkwy left turn lane Riverfront Street/3rd St & Grade separate critical movements 40 F F Tower Bridge Gateway I-80 Eastbound Ramps & Additional eastbound through lane and additional northbound 44 E Reed Ave right turn lane 3rd Street & C Street Exact Mitigations dependent on final design of new bridge 49 F F crossing Source: DKS Associates, 2015

91 Roadway Segments 2020 Conditions

Projected development through 2020 would result in some roadway segments exceeding their maximum desirable daily volume. When this occurs, a detailed analysis is required to determine if that segment should be widened to accommodate additional travel lanes, including intersection LOS analysis and determining the logical segment that should be widened.

The following roadway segments would have volumes that exceed the maximum desirable volume, however the intersections along these roadway segments are projected to operate within acceptable standards and therefore it is assumed that the segments would operate acceptably:

• Jefferson Boulevard from US 50 EB Ramps to 15th Street; • Harbor Boulevard from US 50 Eastbound Ramps to Industrial Boulevard The following roadway segments would have volumes that exceed maximum desirable volume, and intersections along these roadway segments are projected to exceed acceptable standards. Therefore the following roadway segments cannot be feasibly mitigated: • Jefferson Boulevard from Stone Boulevard to Lake Washington Boulevard; • Jefferson Boulevard from Linden Road (South) to Davis Road; 2035 Conditions

Projected development through 2035 would result in some roadway segments exceeding their maximum desirable daily volume. When this occurs, a detailed analysis is required to determine if that segment should be widened to accommodate additional travel lanes, including intersection LOS analysis and determining the logical segment that should be widened.

• Enterprise Boulevard from Industrial Boulevard to Channel Drive • Harbor Boulevard from Rice Avenue to West Capitol Avenue • Enterprise Boulevard from I-80 eastbound ramps to Industrial Boulevard

The following roadway segments would have volumes that exceed maximum desirable volume, and intersections along these roadway segments are projected to exceed acceptable standards. Therefore the following roadway segments cannot be feasibly mitigated: • Jefferson Boulevard from US 50 Eastbound Ramps to Lake Washington Boulevard • C Street from 5th Street to 3rd Street • Sacramento Avenue from Jefferson Boulevard/ Kegle Drive to 6th Street • 3rd Street from B Street to Tower Bridge Gateway Because some of these roadway segments exceed maximum desirable volume thresholds and have intersections along them that do not meet LOS standards, impacts at these roadway segments would be significant and unavoidable.

92 Residential Streets Whereas constructing additional lanes may be considered for arterials and major collectors to provide adequate capacity when they exceed their maximum desirable daily traffic volume, it is not appropriate for residential collectors and residential local streets. Most of the impacts on residential streets in the 2035 horizon are due to the City’s thresholds for growth in traffic volumes, not that they would exceed the maximum desirable daily traffic volume. When the total traffic volume or growth in traffic volume on a residential street exceeds its threshold, the mitigation should focus on reducing that volume, not widening to accommodate that volume. Methods to reduce impacts on streets with residential frontage can include improvements to parallel arterials, neighborhood traffic management and/or traffic calming measures. While these types of mitigation measures would lessen the severity of the impacts, it is unknown whether those measures would reduce the traffic volumes on any of the impacted residential streets to the level required to fully mitigate the impact. Therefore, the impacts at these residential streets would be significant and unavoidable Freeway Mainline and Ramps The analysis indicates that portions of the mainline and ramps along I-80 and US 50 currently operate at unacceptable levels of service and level of congestion on the freeway will increase by 2035. While development within the City of West Sacramento will contribute to the increase in congestion levels on I- 80 and US 50, a significant amount of the growth in congestion will be due to trips that have neither their origin nor destination within the City. Determination of cumulative impacts on the freeway system assumed full implementation of all planned and funded improvements as specified in SACOG’s 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). The City of West Sacramento will support State highway expansion and management plans consistent with the SACOG 2035 MTP/SCS. West Sacramento on can also participate in additional impact fee programs designed to improve operations on the State Highway system, where costs are allocated on a fair share basis over a broad area most likely covering several jurisdictions. West Sacramento is currently participating in the I-5 Subregional Corridor Mitigation Program (SCMP), a multi-jurisdictional fee program that will fund transportation improvements that will help reduce congestion (delay) on the State Highway System. Some of those improvements are not on the freeway mainlines, but are parallel roadway or transit facilities that serve to reduce the number of vehicles traveling on the mainline. Improvements funded by the SCMP Fee Program include the streetcar project between Downtown Sacramento and West Sacramento and new Sacramento River crossings. Caltrans agrees that payment of the SCMP fee under this program would adequately mitigate a development project’s impact on the State Highway System under CEQA. This includes impacts that would be identified by freeway mainline LOS analysis and “merge and diverge” analysis where freeway ramps meet the freeway mainline. A development project applicant would still be required to evaluate and mitigate significant impacts to intersections where freeway ramps meet local roadways, Each development project would still be required to comply with CEQA and the applicable policies of the jurisdiction in which the development is located, including the preparation of appropriate traffic studies, and identification of impacts and mitigation measures on the local street system. Bicycles, Pedestrians and Transit No mitigation measures are required

Appendix A: Lane Diagrams and Turning Movement Volumes

AM Peak Hour

Existing A.M. Peak Hour - Existing

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 17 33 0 0 Kegle Dr

94 376 27 162 106 764 63 6 54 0 7 1 35 0 0 0 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

    159    53    0     24 Sacramento Ave Triangle Ct F St Michigan Blvd Driveway West Capitol Ave       43  14  96  64  Jefferson BlvdJefferson 0 0 0 0

174 3 89 1 0 204 282 144 128 580 226 141 404 26 0 0

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A E/W Signalized Del: 32.8 E/W Signalized Del: 6.6 E/W Signalized Del: 14.8 E/W Signalized Del: 8.7 Jefferson Blvd/Kegle Dr & Jefferson Blvd & Triangle Jefferson Blvd & Michigan Jefferson Blvd & West 1 2 3 4 Sacramento Ave Ct/F St Blvd/Driveway Capitol Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 18 0 361 30 4 0 15 13 0 844 0 0 59 389 506 100 45 736 56 24 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

   0  0    428    106 Merkley Ave US 50 EB Off Ramp Park Blvd US 50 WB Ramps 15th St      0  80  77   83   0 0 0 0

10 21 74 0 296 32 76 716 770 629

136 113 1,153 6 42 1,365

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: E N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 48.4 E/W Signalized Del: 8.5 E/W Signalized Del: 56.5 E/W Signalized Del: 20.5 Jefferson Blvd & Merkley Jefferson Blvd & US 50 EB Jefferson Blvd & Park 5 6 7 8 Jefferson Blvd & 15th St Ave Off Ramp Blvd/US 50 WB Ramps

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 74 0 353 17 902 105 38 892 0 0 1 1,002 12 0 10 997 0 0 5 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

 0    2  0     12 Stone Blvd S River Rd Valley Oak Ln Devon Ave Gateway Dr     32  0   49  57  0 0 4 9 0 4

0 90 0 0 9 50

133 2,237 1 2,286 16 2,266 34 1,860

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 9.2 E/W Signalized Del: 12.4 E/W Signalized Del: 7.8 E/W Signalized Del: 20.3 Jefferson Blvd & Valley Oak Jefferson Blvd & Devon 9 Jefferson Blvd & Stone Blvd 10 Jefferson Blvd & S River Rd 11 12 Ln Ave/Gateway Dr

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 424 208 268 3 154 655 134 243 241 527 138 50 49 390 266 17 66 447 3 0 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

   35    100     83    1 Lake Washington Blvd Linden Rd Higgins Rd Linden Rd      162   448   180  185  5 0

209 24 71 41 46 25 0 487 137 838 145 881

229 1,228 42 1,102 17 99

N/S Signalized LOS: E N/S Signalized LOS: F N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 72.2 E/W Signalized Del: 168.8 E/W Signalized Del: 35.0 E/W Signalized Del: 12.7 Jefferson Blvd & Lake 13 14 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd 15 Jefferson Blvd & Higgins Rd 16 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd Washington Blvd A.M. Peak Hour - Existing

2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 1 5 0 91

253 183 2 0 59 122 9 332 50 507 0 0 0 506 84 0 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson N Harbor Blvd Harbor N   0     216  0   14 Marshall Rd Reed Ave Riverpoint Ct Rice Ave         619 30 Harbor Blvd 35 0 0 0 0

0 17 315 97 0 0 39 17 382 198 121 188 78 135 360 0 408

N/S Signalized LOS: F N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: A E/W Signalized Del: 86.4 E/W Signalized Del: 18.8 E/W Signalized Del: 8.7 E/W Signalized Del: 9.4 Jefferson Blvd & Marshall Harbor Blvd/N Harbor Blvd 17 18 19 Harbor Blvd & Riverpoint Ct 20 Harbor Blvd & Rice Ave Rd & Reed Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2 97 35 282 99 301 93 18 458 36 0 648 0 54 446 3 0 112 25 0 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor

   5    125    245   595 Duluth St West Capitol Ave Evergreen Ave US 50 WB Off-ramp 18   92    18    0  0 0

1 34 118 99 17 0 30 424 78 147 384 122 121 536 229 0 597 567

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A E/W Signalized Del: 5.5 E/W Signalized Del: 16.8 E/W Signalized Del: 20.3 E/W Signalized Del: 9.8 Harbor Blvd & West Capitol Harbor Blvd & Evergreen Harbor Blvd & US 50 WB 21 Harbor Blvd & Duluth St 22 23 24 Ave Ave Off-ramp

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 174 19 249 1,215 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor 0 947 279 0 460 1,091 25 0 17 631 457 1 100 6 545 310

  0   0    8    4

EB US 50 Ramps Beacon Blvd Del Monte St Industrial Blvd 0   145   3   77   0 0 1 9 0 2 1 7 77 1 6 1 993 669

0 10 1,507 2 1,280 1

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: E E/W Signalized Del: 6.6 E/W Signalized Del: 11.6 E/W Signalized Del: 21.3 E/W Signalized Del: 79.8 Harbor Blvd & EB US 50 Harbor Blvd & Industrial 25 26 Harbor Blvd & Beacon Blvd 27 Harbor Blvd & Del Monte St 28 Ramps Blvd

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 128 33 262 270 310 38 7 648 245 11 1 21 1,508 18 2 Terminal St St Terminal Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise     1    48    51

Industrial Blvd Southport Pkwy Blvd Washington Lake Industrial Blvd         28 835 6 No Existing Count 1 2 1 5

583 27 62 5 32

127 711 261 Available 4 259 0

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 10.4 E/W Signalized Del: 29.1 E/W Signalized Del: 15.1 Terminal St & Industrial Lake Washington Blvd & Enterprise Blvd & Industrial 29 30 31 Blvd Southport Pkwy Blvd

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 0 29 30 0 0 0 81 30 26 16 132 31 52 791 0 0 150 Ave Poplar 260 183 Westacre Rd Rd Westacre Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise        0  Ramps 80 WB I 0  4   83

I 80 EB Ramps West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave 41   0    60    15    0 0

0 99 70 236 15 18 12 201 83 80 67 174 325 275 195 805 20 61

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 11.0 E/W Signalized Del: 17.0 E/W Signalized Del: 6.5 E/W Signalized Del: 14.4 Enterprise Blvd & I 80 EB I 80 WB Ramps & West Poplar Ave & West Capitol Westacre Rd & West Capitol 33 34 35 36 Ramps Capitol Ave Ave Ave A.M. Peak Hour - Existing

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 5 62 36 151 5th St 5th St 3rd St 3rd 0 85 58 33 170 62 23 12 58 48 2 8 104 0 141 176 Merkley Ave Ave Merkley              

40 Ave Capitol West 4 34 9

West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave Tower Bridge Gateway Tower Bridge Gateway      

23  0  42   242 Riverfront St  Garden St 8 0 6 9 5

113 14 19 0 73 656 734 29 22 17 0 6 215 287 1

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 8.4 E/W Signalized Del: 10.2 E/W Signalized Del: 31.3 E/W Signalized Del: 15.8 Merkley Ave & West Capitol Garden St & West Capitol 5th St & Tower Bridge Riverfront St/3rd St & 37 38 39 40 Ave Ave Gateway Tower Bridge Gateway 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 48 2 14 0 5th St 5th Driveway Garden St Garden 0 270 1 1 8 15 0 0 0 7 11 73 135 0 636 318      1  8     146 278

Tower Bridge Gateway US 50 WB Ramps Bridge St Reed Ave Reed Ave         I 80 WB Ramps 20   404  1  0 I 80 EB Ramps  Riske Ln Riske 0 5 8 0

626 16 11 10 14 170 633 30 130 160 127 332 532 90 479 181

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 13.9 E/W Signalized Del: 8.4 E/W Signalized Del: 11.9 E/W Signalized Del: 13.1 Riske Ln/Garden St & 5th St & US 50 WB I 80 WB Ramps/Driveway & 41 42 43 44 I 80 EB Ramps & Reed Ave Tower Bridge Gateway Ramps/Bridge St Reed Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 39 91 7 3rd St 3rd Bryte Ave Bryte 120 0 83 438 99 10 141 357 11 6 14 290 Todhunter Ave Todhunter    0    7   253

Sacramento Ave Sacramento Ave C St Kilne St       No Existing Count 60  102  0  Sierra Pl Sierra 0 0 0 5

Available 522 483 19 21 26 471 10 48 0 9 24

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 11.9 E/W Signalized Del: 13.1 E/W Signalized Del: 11.5 Sierra Pl/Todhunter Ave & 46 Bryte Ave & Sacramento Ave 47 49 3rd St & C St/Kilne St Sacramento Ave

PM Peak Hour

Existing P.M. Peak Hour - Existing

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 20 34 9 0 Kegle Dr

58 239 28 243 49 722 34 8 78 36 27 21 6 0 0 0 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

    204    77    0     93 Sacramento Ave Triangle Ct F St Michigan Blvd Driveway West Capitol Ave       122  92  47  77  Jefferson BlvdJefferson 0 0 0 0 0

371 11 81 76 11 0 38 317 296 182 646 339 132 0 0

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 39.0 E/W Signalized Del: 19.0 E/W Signalized Del: 24.8 E/W Signalized Del: 17.8 Jefferson Blvd/Kegle Dr & Jefferson Blvd & Triangle Jefferson Blvd & Michigan Jefferson Blvd & West 1 2 3 4 Sacramento Ave Ct/F St Blvd Capitol Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 37 0 441 26 982 0 55 0 28 48 0 0 106 714 394 108 82 1,386 35 109 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

   0  0    832    375 Merkley Ave US 50 EB Off Ramp Park Blvd US 50 WB Ramps 15th St      14  103  84   68   0 0 0 0 2

30 70 0 125 31 64 482 454 770 237

95 240 1,008 14 74

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 43.7 E/W Signalized Del: 11.8 E/W Signalized Del: 36.9 E/W Signalized Del: 34.1 Jefferson Blvd & Merkley Jefferson Blvd & US 50 EB Jefferson Blvd & Park 5 6 7 8 Jefferson Blvd & 15th St Ave Off Ramp Blvd/US 50 WB Ramps

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 41 0 50 1,947 1,947 72 26 1,921 0 0 0 0 24 1,950 0 0 57 1,705 204 3 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

 0    6  0     12 Stone Blvd nal Access/S River Rd Valley Oak Ln Devon Ave Gateway Dr     28  0   21  41  0 0 0

0 78 0 17 0 18 3 55 20

109 1,048 0 1,112 12 1,108 23 1,012

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: E E/W Signalized Del: 9.2 E/W Signalized Del: 5.8 E/W Signalized Del: 6.7 E/W Signalized Del: 66.8 Jefferson Blvd & Barge Jefferson Blvd & Valley Oak Jefferson Blvd & Devon 9 Jefferson Blvd & Stone Blvd 10 11 12 Canal Access/S River Rd Ln Ave/Gateway Dr

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 185 156 84 3

227 1,014 501 101 353 839 254 98 109 943 100 9 110 889 0 0 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson        34  255   42    0 Lake Washington Blvd Linden Rd Higgins Rd Linden Rd      229   141   109  138  1

376 27 36 20 8 17 16 0 91 222 685 553 140 529 469 473 18 13 84

N/S Signalized LOS: E N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 59.5 E/W Signalized Del: 47.7 E/W Signalized Del: 20.2 E/W Signalized Del: 12.2 Jefferson Blvd & Lake 13 14 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd 15 Jefferson Blvd & Higgins Rd 16 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd Washington Blvd P.M. Peak Hour - Existing

2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 5 0 102 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor 24 138 12 96 533 0 0 705 108 479 399 1 0 273 0 0 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson N Harbor Blvd Harbor N      0   237  0  38 Marshall Rd Reed Ave Riverpoint Ct Rice Ave         317 78 Harbor Blvd 100 0 0 0 0

0 17 583 0 0 28 22 187 250 209 171 317 284 296 600 0 796

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 18.5 E/W Signalized Del: 20.8 E/W Signalized Del: 11.1 E/W Signalized Del: 10.6 Jefferson Blvd & Marshall Harbor Blvd/N Harbor Blvd 17 18 19 Harbor Blvd & Riverpoint Ct 20 Harbor Blvd & Rice Ave Rd & Reed Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 3 151 38 392 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor 117 515 180 24 738 62 0 963 0 45 702 2 0 118 46 0

   1    143    229   457 Duluth St West Capitol Ave Evergreen Ave US 50 WB Off-ramp 111   129    22    0  2 0

0 17 176 33 0 43 704 183 105 483 140 150 156 690 212 0 636 348

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A E/W Signalized Del: 5.4 E/W Signalized Del: 21.4 E/W Signalized Del: 24.3 E/W Signalized Del: 7.5 Harbor Blvd & West Capitol Harbor Blvd & Evergreen Harbor Blvd & US 50 WB 21 Harbor Blvd & Duluth St 22 23 24 Ave Ave Off-ramp

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 156 37 352 521 277 74 10 945 229 90 15 901 0 945 482 0 1,119 1 1 85 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor

  0   5    9    2

US 50 EB Ramps Beacon Blvd Del Monte St Industrial Blvd 0   440   16   154   0 9 1 4 2 5

0 5 27 34 335 11 824 731 655 0 17 1,099 37 6

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: D E/W Signalized Del: 47.8 E/W Signalized Del: 21.4 E/W Signalized Del: 18.2 E/W Signalized Del: 45.9 Harbor Blvd & US 50 EB Harbor Blvd & Industrial 25 26 Harbor Blvd & Beacon Blvd 27 Harbor Blvd & Del Monte St 28 Ramps Blvd

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 34 32 286 497 745 86 6 175 265 5 7 107 593 28 2 Terminal St St Terminal Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise     2    124    20

Industrial Blvd Southport Pkwy Blvd Washington Lake Industrial Blvd     8  271   8  No Existing Count 0 5 2 5

1,232 34 64 2 59 Available 0 185 168 239 2 618

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 9.5 E/W Signalized Del: 27.7 E/W Signalized Del: 23.3 Terminal St & Industrial Lake Washington Blvd & Enterprise Blvd & Industrial 29 30 31 Blvd Southport Pkwy Blvd

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 0 19 34 0 0 0 55 27 17 17 62 34 166 290 0 0 228 Ave Poplar 340 252 Westacre Rd Rd Westacre Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise        0  Ramps 80 WB I 0  6   65

I 80 EB Ramps West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave 81   0    52    42    0 0 9

0 177 43 371 17 16 328 88 68 60 203 650 260 166 265 20 81

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 12.6 E/W Signalized Del: 9.0 E/W Signalized Del: 5.9 E/W Signalized Del: 13.8 Enterprise Blvd & I 80 EB I 80 WB Ramps & West Poplar Ave & West Capitol Westacre Rd & West Capitol 33 34 35 36 Ramps Capitol Ave Ave Ave P.M. Peak Hour - Existing

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 17 104 46 61 5th St 5th St 3rd St 3rd 0 136 85 33 187 92 99 111 193 23 8 9 211 0 749 927 Merkley Ave Ave Merkley              

69 Ave Capitol West 5 248 60

West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave Tower Bridge Gateway Tower Bridge Gateway      

34  0  61   38 Riverfront St  Garden St 6 0 2 1 2

184 18 46 0 739 20 95 867 27 45 0 156 11 184 6

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 8.5 E/W Signalized Del: 12.2 E/W Signalized Del: 36.7 E/W Signalized Del: 20.5 Merkley Ave & West Capitol Garden St & West Capitol 5th St & Tower Bridge Riverfront St/3rd St & 37 38 39 40 Ave Ave Gateway Tower Bridge Gateway

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 134 2 12 0 5th St 5th Driveway Garden St Garden 0 509 2 2 11 19 0 0 0 11 5 124 658 0 196 339      2  64     255 492

Tower Bridge Gateway US 50 WB Ramps Bridge St Reed Ave Reed Ave         I 80 WB Ramps 14   157  1  0 I 80 EB Ramps  Riske Ln Riske 8 8 0 6 3 0

666 10 2 437 70 677 26 192 127 506 476 297 105 415

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 14.0 E/W Signalized Del: 7.7 E/W Signalized Del: 14.7 E/W Signalized Del: 12.2 Riske Ln/Garden St & 5th St & US 50 WB 41 42 43 I 80 WB Ramps & Reed Ave 44 I 80 EB Ramps & Reed Ave Tower Bridge Gateway Ramps/Bridge St

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 51 87 15 3rd St 3rd Bryte Ave Bryte 66 0 87 3 7 21 70 0 59 514 484 577 Todhunter Ave Todhunter    0    25   69

Sacramento Ave Sacramento Ave C St Kilne St       No Existing Count 105  101  7  Sierra Pl Sierra 1 0 0 6

Available 757 703 17 25 415 34 12 0 25 31 304

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 11.2 E/W Signalized Del: 10.7 E/W Signalized Del: 14.6 Sierra Pl/Todhunter Ave & 46 Bryte Ave & Sacramento Ave 47 49 3rd St & C St/Kilne St Sacramento Ave

AM Peak Hour

2020 Scenario A.M. Peak Hour - 2020 Scenario

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 17 33 12 30 Kegle Dr

94 376 27 162 106 764 63 6 90 743 14 2 110 615 76 78 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

    159    53    3     58 Sacramento Ave Triangle Ct F St Michigan Blvd Driveway West Capitol Ave       43  14  144  118  Jefferson BlvdJefferson 0

174 3 89 2 40 98 45 204 282 144 128 580 639 100 507 404 26 76 69

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 29.5 E/W Signalized Del: 6.6 E/W Signalized Del: 21.5 E/W Signalized Del: 34.1 Jefferson Blvd/Kegle Dr & Jefferson Blvd & Triangle Jefferson Blvd & Michigan Jefferson Blvd & West 1 2 3 4 Sacramento Ave Ct/F St Blvd/Driveway Capitol Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 18 0 361 30 844 0 35 679 15 15 0 0 59 389 506 100 45 736 56 24 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

   43  0    428    106 Merkley Ave US 50 EB Off Ramp Park Blvd US 50 WB Ramps 15th St      7  80  77   83   0 0 0

12 0 296 32 76 100 642 161 716 770 629

204 113 1,153 6 42 1,365

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 26.6 E/W Signalized Del: 7.5 E/W Signalized Del: 39.0 E/W Signalized Del: 20.5 Jefferson Blvd & Merkley Jefferson Blvd & US 50 EB Jefferson Blvd & Park 5 6 7 8 Jefferson Blvd & 15th St Ave Off Ramp Blvd/US 50 WB Ramps

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 133 0 353 1,002 1,002 12 38 892 0 0 1 0 10 997 0 0 17 902 105 5 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

 0    32  0     12 Stone Blvd S River Rd Valley Oak Ln Devon Ave Gateway Dr     32  0   49  57  0 0 4 9 0 4

0 90 0 0 9 50

133 2,237 0 2,286 16 2,286 34 1,860

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 9.2 E/W Signalized Del: 11.1 E/W Signalized Del: 8.0 E/W Signalized Del: 21.0 Jefferson Blvd & Valley Oak Jefferson Blvd & Devon 9 Jefferson Blvd & Stone Blvd 10 Jefferson Blvd & S River Rd 11 12 Ln Ave/Gateway Dr

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 424 208 268 3

154 655 134 243 241 527 138 50 49 390 266 17 66 447 3 0 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

   35    100     83    1 Lake Washington Blvd Linden Rd Higgins Rd Linden Rd      162   162   180  185  5 0

209 24 209 41 46 25 0 487 137 838 145 881

229 1,228 229 1,102 17 99

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 39.2 E/W Signalized Del: 42.3 E/W Signalized Del: 35.0 E/W Signalized Del: 12.7 Jefferson Blvd & Lake 13 14 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd 15 Jefferson Blvd & Higgins Rd 16 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd Washington Blvd A.M. Peak Hour - 2020 Scenario

2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 1 5 0 91

0 17 315 97 0 0 39 17 382 198 121 188 78 135 360 0 408

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: A E/W Signalized Del: 45.9 E/W Signalized Del: 18.8 E/W Signalized Del: 8.7 E/W Signalized Del: 9.4 Jefferson Blvd & Marshall Harbor Blvd/N Harbor Blvd 17 18 19 Harbor Blvd & Riverpoint Ct 20 Harbor Blvd & Rice Ave Rd & Reed Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2 97 35 282 54 446 3 0 99 301 93 112 18 458 36 25 0 648 0 0 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor

   5    125    245   595 Duluth St West Capitol Ave Evergreen Ave US 50 WB Off-ramp 18   92    18    0  0 0 0

1 34 118 99 17 0 536 30 424 78 147 384 122 121 229 0 597

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A E/W Signalized Del: 5.5 E/W Signalized Del: 16.8 E/W Signalized Del: 20.3 E/W Signalized Del: 7.3 Harbor Blvd & West Capitol Harbor Blvd & Evergreen Harbor Blvd & US 50 WB 21 Harbor Blvd & Duluth St 22 23 24 Ave Ave Off-ramp

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 174 19 249 1,215 279 460 25 17 457 100 6 0 947 0 1,091 0 631 1 545 310 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor

  0   0    8    4

EB US 50 Ramps Beacon Blvd Del Monte St Industrial Blvd 0   145   3   77  

0 0 1 9 0 2 1 7 77 1 6 1 993 669 0 10 1,507 0 1,280 1

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: D E/W Signalized Del: 6.6 E/W Signalized Del: 11.6 E/W Signalized Del: 21.3 E/W Signalized Del: 54.7 Harbor Blvd & EB US 50 Harbor Blvd & Industrial 25 26 Harbor Blvd & Beacon Blvd 27 Harbor Blvd & Del Monte St 28 Ramps Blvd

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 128 33 262 0 11 1 21 38 7 648 245 0 0 0 1,508 270 310 18 2 0 Terminal St St Terminal Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise Blvd Enterprise     1    48    51    0

Industrial Blvd Southport Pkwy Blv Washington Lake Industrial Blvd Lake Rd 28    835    6   0    1 2 0 5 0 0 0

583 27 62 5 32 0 711 4 259 127 0 261 0

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A E/W Signalized Del: 10.3 E/W Signalized Del: 29.1 E/W Signalized Del: 15.1 E/W Signalized Del: 0.0 Terminal St & Industrial Lake Washington Blvd & Enterprise Blvd & Industrial 29 30 31 32 Enterprise Blvd & Lake Rd Blvd Southport Pkwy Blvd

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 0 29 30 52 791 0 0 0 0 81 30 26 16 132 31 0 150 Ave Poplar 260 183 Westacre Rd Rd Westacre Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise        0  Ramps 80 WB I 0  4   83

I 80 EB Ramps West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave 41   0    60    15    0 0

0 99 70 236 15 18 12 201 83 80 67 174 325 275 195 805 20 61

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 5 62 36 151 5th St 5th St 3rd St 3rd 0 85 58 33 170 62 23 12 58 48 2 8 104 0 141 176 Merkley Ave Ave Merkley               

40 Ave Capitol West 4 34 9

West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave Tower Bridge Gateway Tower Bridge Gateway      

23  0  42   242 Riverfront St  Garden St 8 0 6 9 5

113 14 19 0 73 656 734 29 22 17 0 6 215 287 1

626 16 11 10 14 170 633 30 130 160 127 332 532 90 479 181

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 39 91 7 3rd St 3rd Bryte Ave Bryte 0 0 0 0 120 0 83 438 99 10 141 357 12 7 12 312 Todhunter Ave Todhunter     0    0    7   249

Reed Ave Ikea Dr Ct/Riverpoint Sacramento Ave Sacramento Ave C St Kilne St 0    60    102    0    Sierra Pl Sierra 0 1 0 0 0 0 5

0 522 483 19 21 26 500 10 62 0 0 9 24

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 2.0 E/W Signalized Del: 11.9 E/W Signalized Del: 13.1 E/W Signalized Del: 11.9 Ikea Ct/Riverpoint Dr & Sierra Pl/Todhunter Ave & 45 46 Bryte Ave & Sacramento Ave 47 49 3rd St & C St/Kilne St Reed Ave Sacramento Ave

PM Peak Hour

2020 Scenario P.M. Peak Hour - 2020 Scenario

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 21 45 23 70 Kegle Dr

56 240 31 241 46 747 57 8 119 781 38 21 110 534 97 143 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

    204    71    9     176 Sacramento Ave Triangle Ct F St Michigan Blvd Driveway West Capitol Ave       128  94  87  175  Jefferson BlvdJefferson 2

391 15 85 73 13 79 152 72 335 288 182 644 694 141 484 382 133 50 93

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: D E/W Signalized Del: 41.9 E/W Signalized Del: 18.9 E/W Signalized Del: 16.0 E/W Signalized Del: 35.4 Jefferson Blvd/Kegle Dr & Jefferson Blvd & Triangle Jefferson Blvd & Michigan Jefferson Blvd & West 1 2 3 4 Sacramento Ave Ct/F St Blvd Capitol Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 37 0 417 16 974 0 77 669 28 52 0 0 110 733 358 103 80 1,411 42 107 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

   152  0    832    290 Merkley Ave US 50 EB Off Ramp Park Blvd US 50 WB Ramps 15th St      49  104  85   69   0 0 0

31 0 130 29 65 161 652 145 512 521 883 179

194 234 1,015 14 77

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 25.9 E/W Signalized Del: 9.5 E/W Signalized Del: 26.9 E/W Signalized Del: 32.1 Jefferson Blvd & Merkley Jefferson Blvd & US 50 EB Jefferson Blvd & Park 5 6 7 8 Jefferson Blvd & 15th St Ave Off Ramp Blvd/US 50 WB Ramps

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 24 0 55 1,952 1,952 11 26 1,865 0 0 0 0 30 2,017 0 0 60 1,784 192 4 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

 0    74  0     13 Stone Blvd nal Access/S River Rd Valley Oak Ln Devon Ave Gateway Dr     27  0   22  45  0 0 0

0 78 0 25 0 21 2 55 14

109 1,106 0 1,187 15 1,190 23 1,089

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 8.7 E/W Signalized Del: 5.4 E/W Signalized Del: 6.9 E/W Signalized Del: 23.9 Jefferson Blvd & Barge Jefferson Blvd & Valley Oak Jefferson Blvd & Devon 9 Jefferson Blvd & Stone Blvd 10 11 12 Canal Access/S River Rd Ln Ave/Gateway Dr

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 186 163 100 3

236 1,070 514 112 354 863 276 101 113 969 104 10 108 911 0 0 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

   34    264     42    0 Lake Washington Blvd Linden Rd Higgins Rd Linden Rd      294   136   110  139  1

390 28 37 20 9 17 16 0 92 227 688 557 154 531 468 464 19 14 86

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 49.2 E/W Signalized Del: 43.4 E/W Signalized Del: 19.8 E/W Signalized Del: 12.1 Jefferson Blvd & Lake 13 14 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd 15 Jefferson Blvd & Higgins Rd 16 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd Washington Blvd P.M. Peak Hour - 2020 Scenario

2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 8 0 98 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor

490 412 1 0 34 144 14 282 96 525 0 0 0 847 109 0 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson N Harbor Blvd Harbor N      0   244  0  39 Marshall Rd Reed Ave Riverpoint Ct Rice Ave         315 89 Harbor Blvd 100 0 0 0 0

0 18 641 0 0 26 922 23 191 229 206 175 324 435 410 609 0

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 18.3 E/W Signalized Del: 21.2 E/W Signalized Del: 13.4 E/W Signalized Del: 10.3 Jefferson Blvd & Marshall Harbor Blvd/N Harbor Blvd 17 18 19 Harbor Blvd & Riverpoint Ct 20 Harbor Blvd & Rice Ave Rd & Reed Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 3 166 44 392 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor 42 848 2 0 111 669 174 121 28 883 66 48 0 1,101 0 0

   1    143    221   466 Duluth St West Capitol Ave Evergreen Ave US 50 WB Off-ramp 113   142    23    0  2 0 0

0 18 176 34 0 786 43 826 183 109 577 144 145 160 216 0 662

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A E/W Signalized Del: 5.3 E/W Signalized Del: 22.0 E/W Signalized Del: 23.7 E/W Signalized Del: 7.3 Harbor Blvd & West Capitol Harbor Blvd & Evergreen Harbor Blvd & US 50 WB 21 Harbor Blvd & Duluth St 22 23 24 Ave Ave Off-ramp

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 156 37 366 628 599 259 74 10 223 76 16 0 961 0 1,160 1 990 2 959 92 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor

  0   5    12    2

US 50 EB Ramps Beacon Blvd Del Monte St Industrial Blvd 0   414   16   134   0 7 1 0 0 6

0 5 28 37 333 11 874 753 742

0 15 1,202 35 6

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: D E/W Signalized Del: 17.6 E/W Signalized Del: 21.2 E/W Signalized Del: 20.3 E/W Signalized Del: 48.7 Harbor Blvd & US 50 EB Harbor Blvd & Industrial 25 26 Harbor Blvd & Beacon Blvd 27 Harbor Blvd & Del Monte St 28 Ramps Blvd

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 28 32 294 14 5 8 105 86 6 171 270 86 342 11 700 557 751 27 2 1 Terminal St St Terminal Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise Blvd Enterprise     1    124    21    3

Industrial Blvd Southport Pkwy Blvd Washington Lake Industrial Blvd Lake Rd 8    365    8   66    0 5 2 5 2

1,283 36 64 2 53 0 17 260 0 227 174 2 613 13 670

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A E/W Signalized Del: 10.2 E/W Signalized Del: 33.4 E/W Signalized Del: 23.4 E/W Signalized Del: 3.7 Terminal St & Industrial Lake Washington Blvd & Enterprise Blvd & Industrial 29 30 31 32 Enterprise Blvd & Lake Rd Blvd Southport Pkwy Blvd

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 0 16 32 169 287 0 4 0 1 50 27 16 14 64 34 0 221 Ave Poplar 361 267 Westacre Rd Rd Westacre Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise        0  Ramps 80 WB I 0  3   69

I 80 EB Ramps West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave 80   3    51    41    0 0 8

0 175 48 375 15 16 332 89 67 61 207 656 259 166 266 21 75

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 12.7 E/W Signalized Del: 8.9 E/W Signalized Del: 5.7 E/W Signalized Del: 13.5 Enterprise Blvd & I 80 EB I 80 WB Ramps & West Poplar Ave & West Capitol Westacre Rd & West Capitol 33 34 35 36 Ramps Capitol Ave Ave Ave P.M. Peak Hour - 2020 Scenario

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 15 104 64 80 5th St 5th St 3rd St 3rd 0 158 88 15 211 108 99 113 194 23 8 12 225 0 761 937 Merkley Ave Ave Merkley               

69 Ave Capitol West 6 234 90

West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave Tower Bridge Gateway Tower Bridge Gateway      

34  0  72   39 Riverfront St  Garden St 6 0 6 7 7

206 18 46 0 800 20 96 933 41 45 0 168 11 197 18

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 8.4 E/W Signalized Del: 12.3 E/W Signalized Del: 36.8 E/W Signalized Del: 22.1 Merkley Ave & West Capitol Garden St & West Capitol 5th St & Tower Bridge Riverfront St/3rd St & 37 38 39 40 Ave Ave Gateway Tower Bridge Gateway

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 147 2 12 0 5th St 5th Driveway Garden St Garden 0 523 2 2 11 19 0 0 0 15 5 143 639 0 191 368      2  72     282 584

Tower Bridge Gateway US 50 WB Ramps Bridge St Reed Ave Reed Ave         I 80 WB Ramps 19   162  1  0 I 80 EB Ramps  Riske Ln Riske 6 0 8 3 0

716 12 13 16 438 60 719 98 29 280 132 496 505 285 433

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 14.4 E/W Signalized Del: 8.3 E/W Signalized Del: 16.5 E/W Signalized Del: 31.4 Riske Ln/Garden St & 5th St & US 50 WB 41 42 43 I 80 WB Ramps & Reed Ave 44 I 80 EB Ramps & Reed Ave Tower Bridge Gateway Ramps/Bridge St

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 94 52 94 14 3rd St 3rd Bryte Ave Bryte 96 15 119 846 71 0 62 529 71 0 96 496 3 8 21 588 Todhunter Ave Todhunter     109    0    25   67

Reed Ave Ikea Dr Ct/Riverpoint Sacramento Ave Sacramento Ave C St Kilne St 64    106    106    7    Sierra Pl Sierra 1 0 0 6

726 18 821 766 17 25 448 34 12 270 433 178 0 25 31 312

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 22.2 E/W Signalized Del: 11.2 E/W Signalized Del: 11.3 E/W Signalized Del: 16.2 Ikea Ct/Riverpoint Dr & Sierra Pl/Todhunter Ave & 45 46 Bryte Ave & Sacramento Ave 47 49 3rd St & C St/Kilne St Reed Ave Sacramento Ave

AM Peak Hour

2035 Scenario A.M. Peak Hour - 2035 Scenario

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 19 198 24 56 Kegle Dr

115 418 25 413 143 1,139 159 29 122 1,172 16 3 118 773 363 147 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

    271    117    26     99 Sacramento Ave Triangle Ct F St Michigan Blvd Driveway West Capitol Ave       66  25  182  134   Jefferson BlvdJefferson 4

328 16 87 1 56 292 58 518 346 194 157 832 867 713 474 758 50 77 137

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: E E/W Signalized Del: 40.7 E/W Signalized Del: 43.5 E/W Signalized Del: 18.1 E/W Signalized Del: 55.9 Jefferson Blvd/Kegle Dr & Jefferson Blvd & Triangle Jefferson Blvd & Michigan Jefferson Blvd & West 1 2 3 4 Sacramento Ave Ct/F St Blvd Capitol Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 18 0 1,005 117 1,342 1,342 0 43 938 15 15 0 0 51 918 872 340 47 939 169 58 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

   69  0    237    308 Merkley Ave US 50 EB Off Ramp Park Blvd US 50 WB Ramps 15th St      20  0  50   82  

10 0 0 0 359 0 69 112 325 860 686 117 349

196 1,222 501 1,914 9 51 1,343

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: F N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 29.2 E/W Signalized Del: 22.4 E/W Signalized Del: 105.5 E/W Signalized Del: 31.5 Jefferson Blvd & Merkley Jefferson Blvd & US 50 EB Jefferson Blvd & Park 5 6 7 8 Jefferson Blvd & 15th St Ave Off Ramp Blvd/US 50 WB Ramps

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 129 0 191 1,443 1,443 7 121 1,315 0 0 1 0 45 1,469 0 0 19 1,473 31 5 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

 0    68  0     23 Stone Blvd nal Access/S River Rd Valley Oak Ln Devon Ave Gateway Dr     37  0   32  57  0 0 0

0 0 84 0 29 8 50 14 141

135 2,073 1 2,118 43 2,195 34 1,971

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 9.9 E/W Signalized Del: 10.7 E/W Signalized Del: 7.1 E/W Signalized Del: 11.5 Jefferson Blvd & Barge Jefferson Blvd & Valley Oak Jefferson Blvd & Devon 9 Jefferson Blvd & Stone Blvd 10 11 12 Canal Access/S River Rd Ln Ave/Gateway Dr

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 290 237 318 3

340 960 94 315 265 930 199 52 49 472 591 19 69 536 3 0 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

   48    101     83    1 Lake Washington Blvd Linden Rd Higgins Rd Linden Rd      331   424   227  144  5 0

230 26 69 41 58 19 0 635 132 989 149

397 1,336 44 1,355 18 108 1,133

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 47.8 E/W Signalized Del: 41.1 E/W Signalized Del: 44.6 E/W Signalized Del: 12.8 Jefferson Blvd & Lake 13 14 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd 15 Jefferson Blvd & Higgins Rd 16 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd Washington Blvd A.M. Peak Hour - 2035 Scenario

2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 1 33 0 89

249 252 2 0 124 151 131 716 50 564 0 0 0 647 95 0 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson N Harbor Blvd Harbor N   0     250  0   13 Marshall Rd Reed Ave Riverpoint Ct Rice Ave         655 141 Harbor Blvd 35 0 0 0 0

0 47 673 0 0 39 27 607 193 380 131 199 172 331 664 0 910

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 22.9 E/W Signalized Del: 25.4 E/W Signalized Del: 10.3 E/W Signalized Del: 10.9 Jefferson Blvd & Marshall Harbor Blvd/N Harbor Blvd 17 18 19 Harbor Blvd & Riverpoint Ct 20 Harbor Blvd & Rice Ave Rd & Reed Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2 142 41 282 74 462 91 18 620 41 0 848 0 63 577 3 0 160 24 0 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor

   5    148    272   901 Duluth St West Capitol Ave Evergreen Ave US 50 WB Off-ramp 28   89    18    0  0 0 0

1 33 183 15 0 916 137 830 223 124 210 763 29 62 141 1,090 0

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A E/W Signalized Del: 5.2 E/W Signalized Del: 24.2 E/W Signalized Del: 21.0 E/W Signalized Del: 9.4 Harbor Blvd & West Capitol Harbor Blvd & Evergreen Harbor Blvd & US 50 WB 21 Harbor Blvd & Duluth St 22 23 24 Ave Ave Off-ramp

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 174 19 217 1,321 0 368 462 25 40 416 77 4 1,355 1,355 0 1,544 0 1,099 1 1,038 304 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor

  0   0    6     4

EB US 50 Ramps Beacon Blvd Del Monte St Industrial Blvd 0   168    25    82  

0 0 1 8 0 2 2 7 76 1 7 1 963 819 0 8 1,609 2 1,391 1

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 13.0 E/W Signalized Del: 12.3 E/W Signalized Del: 11.3 E/W Signalized Del: 24.1 Harbor Blvd & US 50 EB Harbor Blvd & Industrial 25 26 Harbor Blvd & Beacon Blvd 27 Harbor Blvd & Del Monte St 28 Ramps Blvd

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 150 33 278 19 Terminal St St Terminal 38 7 1,455 233 206 1,591 33 11 1 27 1,611 715 592 20 2 1 Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise Blvd Enterprise

    2    48    51    3

Industrial Blvd Southport Pkwy Blvd Washington Lake Industrial Blvd Lake Rd 28    609     6   176    1 2 0 5 7

1,076 28 62 5 64 1 39 939 268

4 335 0 1,092 35 1,084

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 9.1 E/W Signalized Del: 28.6 E/W Signalized Del: 19.5 E/W Signalized Del: 10.6 Terminal St & Industrial Lake Washington Blvd & Enterprise Blvd & Industrial 29 30 31 32 Enterprise Blvd & Lake Rd Blvd Southport Pkwy Blvd

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 0 54 35 Poplar Ave Ave Poplar 10 0 4 82 30 17 17 137 43 60 1,517 0 0 198 320 Rd Westacre 254 Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise I 80 WB Ramps Ramps 80 WB I

 0    0    3     108

I 80 EB Ramps West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave 39   11    82    21    0

0 152 20 72 447 20 18 17 417 78 82 85 923 584

394 195 #### 21 94

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 35.1 E/W Signalized Del: 27.1 E/W Signalized Del: 6.3 E/W Signalized Del: 15.6 Enterprise Blvd & I 80 EB I 80 WB Ramps & West Poplar Ave & West Capitol Westacre Rd & West Capitol 33 34 35 36 Ramps Capitol Ave Ave Ave A.M. Peak Hour - 2035 Scenario

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 33 643 255 202 5th St 5th St 3rd St 3rd 0 151 202 286 271 192 162 402 164 48 2 11 1,214 0 541 572 Merkley Ave Ave Merkley              

40 Ave Capitol West 17 9 805

West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave Tower Bridge Gateway Tower Bridge Gateway      

23  0  199   212 Riverfront St  Garden St 8 0 4

295 14 19 0 556 733 65 17 0 697 155 190 533 296 71 653 654

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: E N/S Signalized LOS: F E/W Signalized Del: 8.2 E/W Signalized Del: 24.8 E/W Signalized Del: 68.8 E/W Signalized Del: 196.4 Merkley Ave & West Capitol Garden St & West Capitol 5th St & Tower Bridge Riverfront St/3rd St & 37 38 39 40 Ave Ave Gateway Tower Bridge Gateway 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 245 40 14 0 5th St 5th Driveway Garden St Garden 27 52 91 658 0 508 41 0 1 8 15 986 0 0 0 531      114  11     192 455

Tower Bridge Gateway US 50 WB Ramps Bridge St Reed Ave Reed Ave       I 80 WB Ramps   408   894  1  0 I 80 EB Ramps  Riske Ln Riske 0 7 8 0

687 49 145 299 1,164 124 119 137 929 655 195 454 980 135 662 318

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: E E/W Signalized Del: 35.3 E/W Signalized Del: 18.4 E/W Signalized Del: 34.9 E/W Signalized Del: 64.3 Riske Ln/Garden St & 5th St & US 50 WB 41 42 43 I 80 WB Ramps & Reed Ave 44 I 80 EB Ramps & Reed Ave Tower Bridge Gateway Ramps/Bridge St

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 505 77 185 19 3rd St 3rd Bryte Ave Bryte 141 24 212 1,070 136 0 118 867 113 10 159 810 6 6 25 1,157 Todhunter Ave Todhunter     188    0    7   1,108

Reed Ave Ikea Dr Ct/Riverpoint Sacramento Ave Sacramento Ave C St Kilne St 364    85    117    0    Sierra Pl Sierra 0 0 0 6

1,188 18 99 990 972 19 21 26 1,138 21 418 189 0 9 42 978

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: F E/W Signalized Del: 33.9 E/W Signalized Del: 15.0 E/W Signalized Del: 18.0 E/W Signalized Del: 449.2 Ikea Ct/Riverpoint Dr & Sierra Pl/Todhunter Ave & 45 46 Bryte Ave & Sacramento Ave 47 49 3rd St & C St/Kilne St Reed Ave Sacramento Ave

PM Peak Hour

2035 Scenario P.M. Peak Hour - 2035 Scenario

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 17 197 26 355 Kegle Dr

77 302 31 395 84 1,070 148 24 154 1,103 48 21 146 644 248 569 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

    276    81    7     377 Sacramento Ave Triangle Ct F St Michigan Blvd Driveway West Capitol Ave       150  121  122  164   Jefferson BlvdJefferson 7

561 35 12 77 320 796 341 228 105 139 248 638 118

702 167 1,024 26 1,120 9

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: E E/W Signalized Del: 43.3 E/W Signalized Del: 50.9 E/W Signalized Del: 26.4 E/W Signalized Del: 59.8 Jefferson Blvd/Kegle Dr & Jefferson Blvd & Triangle Jefferson Blvd & Michigan Jefferson Blvd & West 1 2 3 4 Sacramento Ave Ct/F St Blvd Capitol Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 37 0 813 292 1,605 1,605 0 85 887 28 52 0 0 44 1,010 1,030 201 118 1,267 124 213 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

    391   0     498    410 Merkley Ave US 50 EB Off Ramp Park Blvd US 50 WB Ramps 15th St       61  131  109   36   0 0 0

31 0 253 59 86 174 947 429 749 799 145

187 486 1,672 16 114 1,230

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: E N/S Signalized LOS: D E/W Signalized Del: 32.2 E/W Signalized Del: 29.7 E/W Signalized Del: 78.2 E/W Signalized Del: 51.0 Jefferson Blvd & Merkley Jefferson Blvd & US 50 EB Jefferson Blvd & Park 5 6 7 8 Jefferson Blvd & 15th St Ave Off Ramp Blvd/US 50 WB Ramps

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 116 0 2 1,962 1,962 47 56 1,901 0 0 0 0 41 2,036 0 0 63 1,932 70 3 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

  0     94   0     16 Stone Blvd nal Access/S River Rd Valley Oak Ln Devon Ave Gateway Dr      50  0   64  50  0 0 0

0 0 0 32 3 55 28 174 103

119 1,403 0 1,488 25 1,527 23 1,523

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 13.3 E/W Signalized Del: 9.3 E/W Signalized Del: 9.0 E/W Signalized Del: 15.0 Jefferson Blvd & Barge Jefferson Blvd & Valley Oak Jefferson Blvd & Devon 9 Jefferson Blvd & Stone Blvd 10 11 12 Canal Access/S River Rd Ln Ave/Gateway Dr

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 126 193 301 3

437 1,133 396 121 333 1,066 301 99 115 1,097 165 13 108 1,076 0 0 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson Blvd Jefferson

   38    252     42    0 Lake Washington Blvd Linden Rd Higgins Rd Linden Rd        533   152   110  142  1

444 39 38 22 10 19 16 0 99 366 881 849 147 615 560 605 20 15 89

N/S Signalized LOS: E N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 64.1 E/W Signalized Del: 29.9 E/W Signalized Del: 20.2 E/W Signalized Del: 12.8 Jefferson Blvd & Lake 13 14 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd 15 Jefferson Blvd & Higgins Rd 16 Jefferson Blvd & Linden Rd Washington Blvd P.M. Peak Hour - 2035 Scenario

2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 109 0 104 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor

467 593 1 0 121 182 57 746 96 790 0 0 0 1,140 115 0 Jefferson Blvd Blvd Jefferson N Harbor Blvd Harbor N       0   259  0  37 Marshall Rd Reed Ave Riverpoint Ct Rice Ave          296 164 Harbor Blvd 100 0 0 0 0

0 28 1,006 0 0 26 277 311 221 337 391 772 45 441 470 0 1,061

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 11.5 E/W Signalized Del: 30.8 E/W Signalized Del: 16.4 E/W Signalized Del: 11.2 Jefferson Blvd & Marshall Harbor Blvd/N Harbor Blvd 17 18 19 Harbor Blvd & Riverpoint Ct 20 Harbor Blvd & Rice Ave Rd & Reed Ave

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 3 121 44 392 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor 111 868 261 25 1,319 72 0 1,307 0 43 1,138 2 0 333 46 0

   1    377     220   411 Duluth St West Capitol Ave Evergreen Ave US 50 WB Off-ramp 114   99    23     0  2 0 0

0 17 194 95 34 0 968 43 965 188 795 124 141 164 232 0 729

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A E/W Signalized Del: 5.5 E/W Signalized Del: 41.4 E/W Signalized Del: 22.6 E/W Signalized Del: 7.4 Harbor Blvd & West Capitol Harbor Blvd & Evergreen Harbor Blvd & US 50 WB 21 Harbor Blvd & Duluth St 22 23 24 Ave Ave Off-ramp

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 156 37 346 1,125 739 263 74 41 188 98 15 0 949 0 1,083 1 917 0 870 86 Harbor Blvd Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor Blvd Harbor

 0   5    13     2

US 50 EB Ramps Beacon Blvd Del Monte St Industrial Blvd 0   418     55    138    0 7 1 1 0 5

0 5 28 35 300 11 989

0 1,117 16 1,720 38 1,241 6

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 23.3 E/W Signalized Del: 18.8 E/W Signalized Del: 10.1 E/W Signalized Del: 21.2 Harbor Blvd & US 50 EB Harbor Blvd & Industrial 25 26 Harbor Blvd & Beacon Blvd 27 Harbor Blvd & Del Monte St 28 Ramps Blvd

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 60 32 295 39 #### 86 6 872 287 169 28 5 7 113 1,199 346 1,008 29 2 1 Terminal St St Terminal Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise Blvd Enterprise     1    124     39     13

Industrial Blvd Southport Pkwy Blv Washington Lake Industrial Blvd Lake Rd 8    510     8   202     0 5 3 5

1,170 36 64 2 64 0 50 11 463 302

0 434 2 #### 48 ####

N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 11.0 E/W Signalized Del: 36.9 E/W Signalized Del: 28.9 E/W Signalized Del: 11.2 Terminal St & Industrial Lake Washington Blvd & Enterprise Blvd & Industrial 29 30 31 32 Enterprise Blvd & Lake Rd Blvd Southport Pkwy Blvd

2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 0 2 1 77 32 0 7 71 26 35 18 73 58 186 856 0 0 455 Ave Poplar 852 741 Westacre Rd Rd Westacre Enterprise Blvd Blvd Enterprise        0  Ramps 80 WB I 0  9   123

I 80 EB Ramps West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave 85    15    58    46    0

0 200 11 46 478 16 16 10 425 70 73 490 801 125

410 #### 166 22 97

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B E/W Signalized Del: 29.2 E/W Signalized Del: 25.8 E/W Signalized Del: 6.1 E/W Signalized Del: 15.3 Enterprise Blvd & I 80 EB I 80 WB Ramps & West Poplar Ave & West Capitol Westacre Rd & West Capitol 33 34 35 36 Ramps Capitol Ave Ave Ave P.M. Peak Hour - 2035 Scenario

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 12 333 174 115 5th St 5th St 3rd St 3rd 0 346 431 270 210 273 127 505 355 23 8 42 477 0 738 701 Merkley Ave Ave Merkley              

69 Ave Capitol West 10 12 902

West Capitol Ave West Capitol Ave Tower Bridge Gateway Tower Bridge Gateway      

34  0  155   159 Riverfront St  Garden St 6 0 4

660 18 46 0 808 1,052 81 45 0 190 243 353 517 212 67 473 761

N/S Signalized LOS: A N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: E N/S Signalized LOS: F E/W Signalized Del: 8.7 E/W Signalized Del: 18.7 E/W Signalized Del: 62.8 E/W Signalized Del: 293.0 Merkley Ave & West Capitol Garden St & West Capitol 5th St & Tower Bridge Riverfront St/3rd St & 37 38 39 40 Ave Ave Gateway Tower Bridge Gateway

2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2000 HCM Signalized 121 53 12 0 5th St 5th Driveway Garden St Garden 0 687 42 2 11 19 0 0 0 56 54 245 1,091 0 397 698        142  67     357 911

Tower Bridge Gateway US 50 WB Ramps Bridge St Reed Ave Reed Ave      I 80 WB Ramps  38   599  1  0 I 80 EB Ramps  Riske Ln Riske 0 9 3 0

785 34 68 636 1,112 49 98 268 165 933 691 756 108 826 411 512

N/S Signalized LOS: C N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: C E/W Signalized Del: 28.1 E/W Signalized Del: 12.2 E/W Signalized Del: 51.9 E/W Signalized Del: 27.0 Riske Ln/Garden St & 5th St & US 50 WB 41 42 43 I 80 WB Ramps & Reed Ave 44 I 80 EB Ramps & Reed Ave Tower Bridge Gateway Ramps/Bridge St

2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 2010 HCM Signalized 285 95 136 29 3rd St 3rd Bryte Ave Bryte 92 0 99 93 0 151 3 7 44 330 35 456 1,274 1,087 1,075 1,133 Todhunter Ave Todhunter            146  0  25  898

Reed Ave Ikea Dr Ct/Riverpoint Sacramento Ave Sacramento Ave C St Kilne St 199    131    106    3    Sierra Pl Sierra 1 0 0 6

1,040 35 1,217 1,199 17 25 1,089 34 12 428 177 293 0 25 31 1,122

N/S Signalized LOS: D N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: B N/S Signalized LOS: F E/W Signalized Del: 54.0 E/W Signalized Del: 20.0 E/W Signalized Del: 18.2 E/W Signalized Del: 462.7 Ikea Ct/Riverpoint Dr & Sierra Pl/Todhunter Ave & 45 46 Bryte Ave & Sacramento Ave 47 49 3rd St & C St/Kilne St Reed Ave Sacramento Ave