DOCSLIB.ORG

FY2021/22 Proposed Budget

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY2021/22 Proposed Budget DARRELL STEINBERG CITY OF SACRAMENTO FACTS CITY OF SACRAMENTO Mayor The City of Sacramento was founded in 1849 and 2022 ANGELIQUE ASHBY CITY BUDGET | FISCAL SACRAMENTO OF YEAR | PROPOSED 2021-2022 Mayor Pro Tempore, District 1 is the oldest incorporated city in California. Proposed SEAN LOLOEE In 1920, city voters adopted a Charter (municipal Councilmember, District 2 constitution) and a City Council/City Manager form 2021 Budget of government. JEFF HARRIS Councilmember, District 3 The City is divided into eight districts. KATIE VALENZUELA Councilmember, District 4 Elected members of the City Council serve a four- year term. JAY SCHENIRER Vice Mayor, District 5 The Mayor is elected by all voters in the City. In ERIC GUERRA 2002, voters approved a measure for the Mayor Councilmember, District 6 to serve full-time. All other Councilmembers are elected by district and serve part-time. RICK JENNINGS, II Councilmember, District 7 The Mayor and other Councilmembers have an MAI VANG equal vote in all matters. Councilmember, District 8 The City of Sacramento currently encompasses approximately 100 square miles. The current estimated population is 510,931. CityofSacramento.org PROPOSED CITY OF SACRAMENTO FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 BUDGET DARRELL STEINBERG Mayor ANGELIQUE ASHBY JAY SCHENIRER Mayor Pro Tempore, District 1 Vice Mayor, District 5 SEAN LOLOEE ERIC GUERRA Councilmember, District 2 Councilmember, District 6 JEFF HARRIS RICK JENNINGS, II Councilmember, District 3 Councilmember, District 7 KATIE VALENZUELA MAI VANG Councilmember, District 4 Councilmember, District 8 HOWARD CHAN City Manager HECTOR BARRON CHRISTOPHER C. CONLIN MICHAEL JASSO Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager LEYNE MILSTEIN Assistant City Manager Prepared by DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE BUDGET, POLICY and STRATEGIC PLANNING DIVISION Dawn Holm Jason Bader Daniel Choe Marian Fahy Angie Galieote Zonousia Lee Leila Menor Elizabeth Ramos Michael Tamayo In conjunction with Department Staff CITY HALL 915 I STREET, 5TH FLOOR SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 3 3 4 5 FY2021/22 Proposed Budget Table of Contents SECTION – 1 Budget Message………………………………………………………………………. 9 Operating Budget Excellence Award……………………………………………….. 13 SECTION – 2 Budget Overview……………………………………………………………………… 15 Proposed Budget Overview……………………………………………………… 17 Mission Critical Augmentations ……………………..………………………... 20 2021-2026 CIP ……………………………………...………………………..... 21 Budget Hearings…..…………………………………..………………………... 21 On the Horizon – Future Fiscal Challenges….……………………….……... 22 General Fund Revenues: Options and Opportunities…………………….… 24 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………. 25 Budget Information……..………………………………………………………… 25 The Budget Presentation………………………………………………………. 25 The Budget Process…………………..……………………………………….. 25 Council Priorities………………………………………………………………... 27 Financial Management Policies……………….…………………………….... 28 Performance Measurement ……………………………………………..……. 28 Sacramento at a Glance…..……………………………………………………... 30 History of the City of Sacramento ……………….…………………………… 30 Demographics.………………………………………………………………...... 31 Community Profile……………………………………………………………… 32 SECTION – 3 The Forecast…………………………………………………………………………… 33 Proposed Financial Forecast……………………………………………………. 35 Financial Forecast………………………………………………………………… 35 General and Measure U Funds Overview……………………………………… 35 General/Measure U Fund Revenues……….…………………………………... 37 General and Measure U Fund Expenditures...………………………………… 46 Measure U Programming and Forecast………………………………………... 50 Enterprise Funds………………………………………………………………….. 53 6 FY2021/22 Proposed Budget SECTION – 4 How to Read This Document………………………………………………………… 69 SECTION – 5 Budget Schedules…………………………………………………………………….. 79 SECTION – 6 Mayor and City Council………………………………………………………………. 117 SECTION – 7 City Attorney…………………………………………………………………………… 123 SECTION – 8 City Auditor…………………………………………………………………………….. 131 SECTION – 9 City Clerk………………………………………………………………………………. 137 SECTION – 10 City Manager…………………………………………………………………………... 143 SECTION – 11 City Treasurer…………………………………………………………………………. 153 SECTION – 12 Community Development…………………………………………………………….. 159 SECTION – 13 Community Response…..………..…………………………………………………... 167 SECTION – 14 Convention and Cultural Services……..……………………………………………. 173 SECTION – 15 Finance…….…………………………………………………………………………… 183 SECTION – 16 Fire………………...……………………………………………………………………. 191 SECTION – 17 Human Resources…………………………………………………………………….. 199 SECTION – 18 Information Technology…………….………………………………………………… 205 SECTION – 19 Police…………………………………………………………………………………… 213 7 FY2021/22 Proposed Budget SECTION – 20 Public Works….……………………………………………………………………….. 225 SECTION – 21 Utilities……………………………………..…………………………………………… 235 SECTION – 22 Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment…………………………………………… 243 SECTION – 23 Citywide and Community Support…………………………………………………… 251 SECTION – 24 Debt Service………………...…………………………………………………………. 261 SECTION – 25 Staffing…………………………………………………………………………………. 267 SECTION – 26 Multi-Year Projects…………………………………………………………………… 295 SECTION – 27 Financial Polices……………………………………………………………………… 309 Budget Control Policy…………………………………………………………….. 311 Debt Management Policy………………………………………………………… 313 Debt Management Policy - Disclosure…………………………………………. 331 DSCR and Development Services Fund Management Policy………………. 335 EMS Revenue Recovery and Fee Waiver Policy……………………………... 339 Fees and Charges Policy………………………………………………………… 345 General/Measure U (G/MU) Fund EUR Policy………………………………… 355 Interfund Loans……………………………………………………………………. 359 Investment Policy…………………………………………………………………. 363 Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB)……………………………………... 375 Pension Funding………………………………………………………………….. 379 Risk Management Funding and Reserve Policy………………………………. 383 SECTION – 28 Resources……….……………………………………………………………………. 387 SECTION – 29 Resolution……….……………………………………………………………………. 399 8 FY2021/22 Proposed Budget 9 FY2021/22 Proposed Budget 1 SECTION - 1 Budget Message 10 FY2021/22 Proposed Budget 11 Howard Chan City Hall City Manager 915 I Street, Fifth Floor Sacramento, CA 95814-2604 916-808-5704 April 21, 2021 Honorable Mayor and City Council Sacramento, California Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: This letter transmits the proposed budget for fiscal year (FY) 2021/22, which totals $1.3 billion for operations and capital improvements. The combined General and Measure U Fund budget of $678 million reflects an increase of $53 million or 8.5% compared to the prior year approved budget. This proposed budget is balanced and represents the City’s financial plan for the upcoming fiscal year. As Sacramento begins to emerge from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic (pandemic), with more residents becoming vaccinated and the State of California and County of Sacramento further loosening restrictions on local business operations, tourism, conferences, and events, we look forward to beginning the transition to post-pandemic life and City business. The forecasts presented in this budget are based on data collected over the previous fiscal year as well as current financial modeling of data available as recent as the end of March. Though the full impact of the pandemic on the City, our businesses and our residents will not be known for some time, the City remains cautiously optimistic about an impending economic recovery. However, in this transition time, the City still faces significant financial challenges. While sales tax revenue has performed better than initially anticipated, the City continues to experience revenue shortfalls in parking and transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenues. The City is continuing to see shortfalls in department revenues, which were not adjusted beyond the current year. As it always seems, needs continue to outpace resources and we will continue to look for opportunities to provide long-term stability to our budgetary framework. Over the past year, helping Sacramentans of all ages and backgrounds has been the City’s top priority, with the City launching or expanding more than 70 programs related to pandemic relief. In the coming fiscal year, the City will continue to offer multiple assistance programs while working to kickstart the local economy. 12 FY2021/22 Proposed Budget The City this past year received and allocated $89 million in federal CARES Act funding for small-business recovery and assistance, youth and workforce training programs, homelessness and rapid rehousing, the arts, and social services. In March, President Joe Biden signed the American Rescue Plan of 2021 (ARP), from which the City expects to receive $121.6 million to address internal financial challenges resulting from the pandemic, to recognize the work of our employees and to provide additional relief to our residents. In addition to the federal funding coming directly to the City there are funds available for specific programs and from the State of California to address needs associated with the negative economic impacts of the pandemic. In the coming months, the City will be working to identify all available funding such that the City can truly leverage all opportunities to receive funding for our priorities. As the funding picture becomes clear we will rely on the Council’s input and direction for the equitable and inclusive allocation of this funding. The City remains focused on supporting its most vulnerable residents and their communities during this difficult time through innovative programs such as the new Safe Ground site near the W/X freeway and the South Front Street Safe Parking site. The City also continues to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: November 18, 2020 ITEM #12
    CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: November 18, 2020 ITEM #12 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A STREETCAR SERVICE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY: [ ] Commission [ X ] Staff Jason McCoy, Supervising Transportation Planner Capital Projects and Transportation Department [ ] Other ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action OBJECTIVE This report provides the City Council with a thorough background and update on the status of the revised Downtown Riverfront Streetcar (Streetcar Project) and provides an opportunity for Staff to receive direction from the City Council pertaining to the Streetcar Service Memorandum of Understanding. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff respectfully requests that the City Council: 1) Approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) as a framework for developing an Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement for the Streetcar Project, and delegate authority to the City Manager to execute the MOU; and 2) Recommend that the Sacramento Regional Transit District (SacRT) Board of Directors execute the MOU at their December 14, 2020 meeting as a framework for developing an Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement for the Streetcar Project. BACKGROUND The Streetcar Project received approval from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to enter Project Development as a Small Starts Project in 2014. This FTA discretionary grant program funds transit capital investments such as light rail and bus rapid transit and requires completion of the Project Development phase in advance of receipt of a construction grant agreement. The original scope of the Streetcar Project was an approximately four-mile looped system extending between the West Sacramento Civic Center and Riverfront Street, across Tower Bridge over the Sacramento River and into Downtown and Midtown Sacramento.
    [Show full text]
  • SMUD Corpyard RFQ.Indd
    September 20, 2019 Request for Qualifications (No. 190180.DJM) Redevelopment of the former SMUD Corporation Yard 59th Street, Folsom Blvd. & U.S. Hwy. 50, Sacramento, CA Responses due by 5 p.m., November 26, 2019 Powering forward. Together. 1146-19 Site Context EAST SACRAMENTO NEIGHBORHOOD St. Francis American River Kit Carson High School Parkway School CSUS Campus Camellia Shopping Center Phoebe Hearst School SITE 59th Street Light Rail Station SMUD Campus UCD Medical Center TAHOE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD Freeway Access SMUD Corporation Yard Redevelopment RFQ Table of Contents Introduction and Summary Land Area and Ownership ..............................................................................................................1 Development Objectives .................................................................................................................2 Land Use Concepts .............................................................................................................................3 Purchase and Sale/Development Agreement .....................................................................3 Supplemental Information Package .........................................................................................5 Summary of Submittal Requirements ......................................................................................5 Informational Meeting and Site Tour ......................................................................................6 Environmental Site Conditions Meeting and Site Tour ................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • City of Sacramento
    CITY OF SACRAMENTO LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT LAND USE POLICIES AND GUIDELINES April 2005 Prepared by Planning Division Long Range Planning Section Development Services Department Todd Leon, Project Manager Jim McDonald AICP, Senior Planner Stacia Cosgrove, Associate Planner Christopher Jordan, Student Assistant Nathan Stephens, Student Assistant http://www.cityofsacramento.org/dsd/planning/plngserv/lngrng/policies.htm TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................I I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 II. CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN...........................................................................5 SECTION 1: POLICIES........................................................................................................7 SECTION 2: RESIDENTIAL LAND USE ELEMENT.........................................................12 SECTION 4: COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY LAND USE ELEMENT ...............................15 SECTION 5: CIRCULATION ELEMENT............................................................................20 III. REGIONAL TRANSIT PLANS .............................................................................................25 A. REGIONAL TRANSIT MASTER PLAN (1993) ............................................................26 B. REGIONAL TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BUS AND LIGHT RAIL FACILITIES...............................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento County
    2018 People’s Guide to HEALTH, WELFARE AND OTHER SERVICES SACRAMENTO COUNTY $ ? Introduction The Peoples Guide is a partnership between the Sacramento Regional Coalition to End Homelessness [SRCEH], Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento Central Labor Council, SacSOS and United Way CA Capital Region. The People’s Guide is a practical self-advocacy information guide and directory on how to get food, income, jobs and training, housing, health and dental care, legal advice, and other important help from local, state and federal programs and community services in Sacramento County. The Guide is not only a self-advocacy guide to these programs, but also gives you advice on what you can do if you are treated unfairly or do not receive what you are entitled to by law. The Sacramento Regional Coalition to End Homelessness [SRCEH] believes that every person has the right to healthy and nutritious food, healthcare, and safe, decent, accessible and affordable housing. Sacramento Regional Coalition to End Homelessness: 916-993-7708 www.srceh.org 2-1-1 Sacramento 2-1-1 is a 24 hour per day, 7 day a week telephone information and referral service. Operators are SacSOS available in many languages. They can help you SRCEH has partnered with SacSOS [www. find emergency food and shelter, legal and financial sacsos.org] to create a People’s Guide assistance, counseling and many other resources. “app” for cell phones and computers Dial 2-1-1 that will be identical to this print edition. Currently SacSOS is a continuously updated TTY line (800) 660-4026 list of free and low-cost resources available Sacramento County 311 Mobile App: While 211 is for to Sacramento residents.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008-2013 Housing Element
    City of Sacramento 2008-2013 Housing Element 2008–2013 Housing Element Update City of Sacramento Adopted November 18, 2008 Resolution No. 2008-758 Prepared for: City of Sacramento Planning Department 915 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Attn: Greg Sandlund Assistant Planner (916) 808-8931 and Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency 600 I Street, Suite 250 Sacramento, CA 95814 Attn: Emily Halcon Management Analyst (916) 440-1399 ext. 1420 Prepared by: EDAW 2022 J Street Sacramento, CA 95811 Contact: Jeff Goldman Principal (916) 414-5800 November 2008 P 07110203.01 HOUSING ELEMENT : Table of Contents H-T Table of Contents H-E EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................... H ES-1 Sacramento’s Housing Challenges.............................................................. H ES-1 Building Upon Our Past Success................................................................ H ES-3 A New Focused Housing Strategy.............................................................. H ES-4 Meeting Our City’s Housing Needs ........................................................... H ES-6 H-1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ H 1-1 1.1 State Law Requirements...................................................................... H 1-1 1.2 Regional Housing Needs Allocation ................................................. H 1-1 1.3 Public Participation .............................................................................. H 1-3 1.4 Organization of the Housing
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Ye​Ar 2020-2021
    COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AUDITOR-CONTROLLER DIVISION 2020-2021 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS LISTING DL # DIRECT LEVY NAME CODEJ STATUS STATUTORY # DIST AGENCY NAME ADDRESS CITY ST ZIP DISTRICT CONTACT PUBLIC PHONE 0010 EAST FRANKLIN CFD NO. 2002-01 122 A MELLO ROOS 0035 CITY OF ELK GROVE 8401 LAGUNA PALMS WAY ELK GROVE CA 95758 CITY OF ELK GROVE (916)627-3205 0011 POPPY RIDGE CFD NO. 2003-01 122 A MELLO ROOS 0035 CITY OF ELK GROVE 8401 LAGUNA PALMS WAY ELK GROVE CA 95758 CITY OF ELK GROVE (916)627-3205 0012 STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 A ACT 1982 0035 CITY OF ELK GROVE 8401 LAGUNA PALMS WAY ELK GROVE CA 95758 CITY OF ELK GROVE (916)627-3205 0013 LAGUNA WEST SERVICE AREA A GC 25210.77(a) 0035 CITY OF ELK GROVE 8401 LAGUNA PALMS WAY ELK GROVE CA 95758 CITY OF ELK GROVE (916)627-3205 0014 LAKESIDE SERVICE AREA I GC 5703.1 0035 CITY OF ELK GROVE 8400 LAGUNA PALMS WAY ELK GROVE CA 95758 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES (916)627-3410 0015 CITY OF ELK GROVE CFD 2003-2 A MELLO-ROOS 0035 CITY OF ELK GROVE 8401 LAGUNA PALMS WAY ELK GROVE CA 95758 CITY OF ELK GROVE (916)627-3205 0016 STREET LIGHTING MAINT DISTRICT #1 A 1982 ACT 0035 CITY OF ELK GROVE 8401 LAGUNA PALMS WAY ELK GROVE CA 95758 CITY OF ELK GROVE (916)627-3205 0017 ELK GROVE DELINQUENT DRAINAGE A GC 25820 0035 CITY OF ELK GROVE 8401 LAGUNA PALMS WAY ELK GROVE CA 95758 CITY OF ELK GROVE (916)627-3205 0018 LAGUNA RIDGE CFD 2005-1 122 A MELLO-ROOS 0035 CITY OF ELK GROVE 8401 LAGUNA PALMS WAY ELK GROVE CA 95758 CITY OF ELK GROVE (916)627-3205 0019 MAINTENANCE SERVICES CFD
    [Show full text]
  • Little Houses: Sacramento's Bungalow Courts Historic
    LITTLE HOUSES: SACRAMENTO’S BUNGALOW COURTS HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY A Project Presented to the faculty of the Department of History California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History (Public History) by Genevieve Sheila Entezari FALL 2012 © 2012 Genevieve Sheila Entezari ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii LITTLE HOUSES: SACRAMENTO’S BUNGALOW COURTS HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY A Project by Genevieve Sheila Entezari Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Lee M.A. Simpson, Ph.D. ____________________________ Date ____________________________________, Second Reader Roberta Deering _________________________ Date iii Student: Genevieve Sheila Entezari I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Patrick Ettinger, Ph.D. Date Department of History iv Abstract of LITTLE HOUSES: SACRAMENTO’S BUNGALOW COURTS HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY by Genevieve Sheila Entezari Statement of Problem Bungalow courts are a unique form of suburban multifamily housing in Sacramento that is at risk of demolition because of urban development. Further loss is possible without proper documentation of their importance as a type of architecture that fulfilled a
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Impact Analysis TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY of WEST SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
    Appendix D Transportation Impact Analysis TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE APRIL 2016 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Street and Road System ................................................................................................................ 5 Physical Constraints on the Street and Road System ........................................................................... 5 Functional Classification of Roadways .................................................................................................. 6 Major Roadways ................................................................................................................................... 8 Arterials and Collectors ....................................................................................................................... 10 Level of Service ................................................................................................................................... 11 Traffic Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 15 Traffic Operating Conditions ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento Streetcar System Plan
    SACRAMENTO STREETCAR SYSTEM PLAN February 2012 Acknowledgements City of Sacramento – City Council Kevin Johnson – Mayor Jay Schenirer – District 5 Angelique Ashby – Vice Mayor, District 1 Kevin McCarty – District 6 Sandy Sheedy – District 2 Darrell Fong – District 7 Steve Cohn – District 3 Bonnie Pannell – District 8 Robert King Fong – District 4 City of Sacramento – Project Coordinators Fedolia “Sparky” Harris – Department of Transportation (DOT) Denise Malvetti – Economic Development Department (EDD) Project Technical Advisory Committee City of Sacramento Sacramento Regional Transit District Hector Barron – DOT RoseMary Covington Bill Crouch – Community Development Jeff Damon Leslie Fritzsche – EDD Ryan Moore – DOT SACOG Tom Pace – Community Development Jim Brown Greg Taylor – Community Development Ed Williams – DOT Consultant Team Fehr & Peers Shiels Obletz Johnsen (SOJ) Bob Grandy (Project Manager) Ken Johnsen David Carter Rick Gustafson Robin Hutcheson Brad Tong Nicole Foletta Kyle Cook HDR Steve Rhyne Charlie Hales Carrie Carsell Jim Hecht Amy Smith Sharon Kelly AIM Consulting Bay Area Economics Gladys Cornell Matt Kowta Ciara Zanze Ron Golem Messagesmith Douglas Wright Consulting Rick Laubscher Doug Wright Sacramento Streetcar System Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................1 Plan Goals . .1 Planning Context . .1 Purpose and Need Statement . 4 II. STREETCAR NETWORK PLANNING PROCESS ..................................6 Planning Stages . .6 III. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento Streetcar System Plan
    SACRAMENTO STREETCAR SYSTEM PLAN February 2012 Acknowledgements City of Sacramento – City Council Kevin Johnson – Mayor Jay Schenirer – District 5 Angelique Ashby – Vice Mayor, District 1 Kevin McCarty – District 6 Sandy Sheedy – District 2 Darrell Fong – District 7 Steve Cohn – District 3 Bonnie Pannell – District 8 Robert King Fong – District 4 City of Sacramento – Project Coordinators Fedolia “Sparky” Harris – Department of Transportation (DOT) Denise Malvetti – Economic Development Department (EDD) Project Technical Advisory Committee City of Sacramento Sacramento Regional Transit District Hector Barron – DOT RoseMary Covington Bill Crouch – Community Development Jeff Damon Leslie Fritzsche – EDD Ryan Moore – DOT SACOG Tom Pace – Community Development Jim Brown Greg Taylor – Community Development Ed Williams – DOT Consultant Team Fehr & Peers Shiels Obletz Johnsen (SOJ) Bob Grandy (Project Manager) Ken Johnsen David Carter Rick Gustafson Robin Hutcheson Brad Tong Nicole Foletta Kyle Cook HDR Steve Rhyne Charlie Hales Carrie Carsell Jim Hecht Amy Smith Sharon Kelly AIM Consulting Bay Area Economics Gladys Cornell Matt Kowta Ciara Zanze Ron Golem Messagesmith Douglas Wright Consulting Rick Laubscher Doug Wright Sacramento Streetcar System Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................1 Plan Goals . .1 Planning Context . .1 Purpose and Need Statement . 4 II. STREETCAR NETWORK PLANNING PROCESS ..................................6 Planning Stages . .6 III. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento Places: Smart Growth Projects in Sacramento
    Sacramento Places: Smart Growth Projects in Sacramento City of Sacramento Planning Department January 2009 Sacramento Places: Smart Growth Projects in Sacramento Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………. Page 3 Mix land uses and support vibrant city centers………………………………………. Page 6 Create a range of housing opportunities and Page 12 choices……………………………………………………………………………………….. Take advantage of existing community assets emphasizing joint use of facilities………………………………………...................... Page 18 Promote distinctive, attractive communities with a strong sense of place………………………………………………………………………………………….. Page 24 Concentrate new development within the urban core of the region…………………………………………………………………………………………. Page 28 Promote resource conservation and energy efficiency…………………………………………………………………………………….. Page 33 2 Introduction Sacramento Places and Smart Growth The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) has projected that Sacramento will grow by an additional 200,000 people and 140,000 jobs by the year 2030. Unfortunately, conventional planning and development approaches have failed to effectively address problems associated with growth, such as traf- fic congestion, deteriorating air quality, and loss of open space. Communities across the nation, including Sacramento, are realizing that a new approach to growth is needed. That’s why citizens, planners, and developers are increasingly embracing the Principles of Smart Growth as a guiding strategy for better ac- commodating a growing population. The Sacramento Places
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Productive and Equitable Community-University Partnerships for Aggie Square
    Developing Productive and Equitable Community-University Partnerships for Aggie Square The University of California Davis-Sacramento Innovation Center April 2019 table of contents introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 report overview ............................................................................................................................. 4 methods .............................................................................................................................................. 6 i. which existing uc davis efforts can inform aggie square? ..................................... 8 A. Inclusive Economic Development ............................................................................................................... 9 B. Workforce Development and Education ................................................................................................... 9 C. Housing Affordability and Supply ................................................................................................................ 11 D. Community Health ........................................................................................................................................... 12 E. Public Space and Mobility .............................................................................................................................. 15 ii. what local challenges can aggie square address? .................................................
    [Show full text]