Introduction
Notes Introduction 1. Álvarez Junco, Mater Dolorosa, p. 25. 2. For the polemics between 1996 and 2004 see Tusell, Aznarato. For an overview of the national question in post-1970s Spain see Balfour and Quiroga, Reinvention of Spain. 3. Connor, ‘Terminological Chaos’, pp. 89–117. 4. See the comments in Halliday, ‘Formation of Yemini Nationalism’, pp. 26–42. 5. Anderson, Imagined Communities,p.6. 6. For a general study which incorporates an analysis of the Hispanic Habsburg Empire see Marx, FaithintheNation. 7. Smith, National Identity, pp. 76–8. 8. The key work for Catalonia is Torres Sans, Naciones sin nacionalismo. 9. Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism, pp. 14–21. 10. As analysed in some depth in Breuilly, Nationalism and the State, pp. 54–71. 11. Stressed in, for example, Breuilly, Nationalism and the State, p. 3; Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism, pp. 9–10. 12. The classic study is Kohn, Idea of Nationalism. 13. Because of its empirical weight, I would stress the importance of Baycroft and Hewitson (eds), What is a Nation? 14. Breuilly, Nationalism and the State, p. 3. Few academics would, however, accept Breuilly’s argument that the term nationalism should be restricted to such opposition groups. 15. Applegate, ‘A Europe of Regions’, pp. 1157–82. 16. Smith, National Identity, p. 146. 17. For a stimulating analysis see Umbach, ‘Nation and Region’, pp. 63–80. 18. Walker Connor, ‘Nation-Building or Nation Destroying?’, p. 43. 19. Breuilly, Nationalism and the State;Hroch,Social Preconditions. 20. Núñez Seixas, ‘Region’, pp. 483–518. 21. Smith, National Identity, pp. 20–1 and 66–7.
[Show full text]