Azazel in the Pseudepigrapha

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Azazel in the Pseudepigrapha Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 13/1 (Spring 2002): 1Ð9. Article copyright © 2002 by William H. Shea. Azazel in the Pseudepigrapha William H. Shea The name ÒAzazelÓ appears in only one biblical passage, Lev 16. There a male goat was selected for Azazel, just as one was selected for Yahweh (vv. 8Ð10). The goat for Yahweh was sacrificed and its blood taken into the sanctu- ary for ministration there (vv. 15Ð19), but the goat for Azazel was not sacrificed. Instead, the symbolic record of sins taken out of the sanctuary was placed upon the head of AzazelÕs goat, and it was taken to the wilderness and released Òto AzazelÓ (v. 22, RSV). By parallelism with the goat selected for Yahweh, the goat selected for Azazel is seen as being selected for another personal being of another type, the antithesis of Yahweh. The fact that this goat was not slain and its blood was not shed indicates that this goat served as part of a removal rite. It did not serve for the forgiveness of sins. Seventh-day Interpreters1 have applied the LordÕs goat to Jesus Christ and seen his death on the cross as the antitype of this goatÕs death, while AzazelÕs goat is taken as symbolizing a demonic figure, i.e., Satan, to whom the responsi- bility for the sin problem is ultimately attributed. The wandering in the wilder- ness of the live goat is then applied to the fate of Satan during the millennium (Rev 20:1Ð3) before he is thrown into the lake of fire at the end of that period (v. 10). Some evangelical writers see both the LordÕs goat and AzazelÕs goat as types of Christ, but others see AzazelÕs goat as a demonic figure. Representing this latter view is the statement, ÒSince verse 8 identifies one goat as Ôfor Ya- 1 F. D. Nichol, ed., The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary (Washington, D.C.: Review & Herald, 1953), 1: 775; S. H. Horn, ed., The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Dictionary (Washington, D.C.: Review & Herald, 1960), 97; A. M. Rodriguez, ÒThe SanctuaryÓ in R. Dederen, ed., Handbook of Seventh-day Adventist Theological. Commentary Reference Series (Hagerstown: Review & Her- ald, 2000), 12:387 1 JOURNAL OF THE ADVENTIST THEOLOGICAL SOCIETY hewhÕ and the other goat as Ôfor Azazel,Õ it is most consistent to consider Azazel a proper name, probably of a demon.Ó2 I Enoch Some of the writers noted previously have noted that the pseudepigraphical work of I Enoch uses the name Azazel for one of the evil angels. In support of the demonic interpretation of Azazel, it may be useful to review the occurrences of this name in this pre-Christian work to see just how that source makes use of this name. There are eight references to Azazel in I Enoch. These references are dis- tributed through two or three of the major sections of this book. Four references occur in The Book of the Watchers, chapters 1Ð10 (8:1; 9:6; 10:4, 8). The Book of EnochÕs Heavenly Journeys, chapters 11Ð36, is sometimes included with The Book of the Watchers and sometimes divided from it. There is one reference to Azazel in this section: 13:1Ð3, These chapters, 1Ð36, are commonly dated to the first half of the second century B.C. on the basis of the finding of fragments from five different manuscripts of this section among the Dead Sea Scrolls.3 Book III ( or II depending on how one divides the text) is known as the Par- ables of Enoch. It includes chapters 37Ð71. There are three references to Azazel in this section: 54:5; 55:5; and 69:3. This section is commonly dated to the last half of the first century B.C.4 These references will be studied in the order in which they occur in I Enoch. 8:1 And Azazel taught men to make swords, and daggers, and shields and breastplates. And he showed them the things after these, and the art of making them: bracelets, and ornaments, and the art of making up the eyes and beautifying the eyelids, and the most precious and choice stones, and all kinds of coloured dyes. And the world was changed. And there was great impiety and much fornication, and they 5 went astray, and all their ways became corrupt. In this passage Azazel belongs to a class of evil angels known as the Watchers, a long list of whom are named in chapter 6. Here Azazel exercises his talent in two directions, towards men and towards women. For the men he has instructed them in the production of weapons of war so that they might fight with each other. The women he has taught to beautify themselves so that they might seduce men. The result of the latter is given as Òmuch fornication.Ó The result of both taken together is that they produced much impiety and corrupted human ways. 2 J. H. Walton, V. H. Matthews and M. W. Chavalas, The IVP Bible Background Commentary (Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2000), 131. 3 H.F.D. Sparks, ed., The Apocryphal Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984), 174. 4 Ibid., 175. 5 Ibid., 190Ð191. Translation by M. A. Knibb. This is the translation used for the rest of the quotes from passages from I Enoch. 2 SHEA: AZAZEL IN THE PSEUDEPIGRAPHA This work of Azazel is also the work of Satan from the biblical point of view, though the Bible is less explicit. 9:6 See then what Azazel has done, how he has taught all iniquity on the earth and revealed the eternal secrets which were made in heaven. This statement is more comprehensive than the first, though less specific. The preceding case states that Azazel worked in two special ways to corrupt mankind. Here it is stated that he Òtaught all iniquity on the earth.Ó This takes in not just the two aspects of evil taught previously, but includes all others. The reference to the Òsecrets in heavenÓ is not clear, but what is clear is that Azazel was not supposed to reveal them on earth, but he went ahead and did it anyway. 10:4 And further the Lord said to Raphael, Bind Azazel by his hands and feet and throw him into the darkness. And split open the desert which is in Dudael, and throw him there. And throw on him jagged and sharp stones and cover him with darkness and let him stay there for ever, and cover his face that he might not see light, and that on the great day of judgment he may be hurled into the fire. Here the results of the work of Azazel, i.e., the work of Satan, come down upon him. This is his judgment for the works cited earlier in 8:1 and 9:6. This Azazel suffers the same fate as his goat does in Lev 16, but that fate is now elaborated in the antitype. He is cast out into a wilderness or desert, but now that desert splits open to accommodate him to a world of darkness, i.e., the abyss. There he is to be covered up Òfor ever.Ó This is an extrabiblical case where Òfor everÓ does not mean Òfor ever and ever and ever.Ó It simply refers to the time allotted to it. For after this comes the second phase of judgment. He is cast into the fire on the great day of judgment. Thus there are two phases to the judgment of Azazel. First he is cast into the abyss of the split desert, and after that he is thrown into the fire. This provides a close parallel to the fate of Satan during and at the end of the millennium, ac- cording to Rev 20. There he is imprisoned in the abyss at the beginning of the millennium, and at the end of the millennium he is cast into the lake of fire dur- ing the great white throne judgment. I Enoch continues parallel to Revelation in this case, for the next statement, in 10:7, is that the earth, which had been ruined by evil angels, will be restored by God. 10:8 And the whole earth has been ruined by the teaching of the works of Azazel, and against him write down all sin. This statement is an antitypical extension of Lev 16:21, which says Aaron was to confess, over AzazelÕs goat, Òall the iniquities of the people of Israel, all their transgression, all their sins.Ó That case was localized to the people of God, Israel. This case is more comprehensive, as it is not limited to the people of God. Now it is all the sins of the whole earth that are in view, and they are to be writ- ten down, recorded against, the account of Azazel. As the one ultimately respon- 3 JOURNAL OF THE ADVENTIST THEOLOGICAL SOCIETY sible for the whole sin problem, Azazel/SatanÕs fate for this activity is what has been stated earlier: the abyss, followed by the fire. 13:1Ð3 And Enoch went and said to Azazel, You will not have peace. A severe sentence came out against you that you should be bound. And you will have neither rest, nor mercy, nor the granting of any petition because of the wrong that you have taught and because of all the works of blasphemy and wrong and sins which you have shown to the sons of men. In his travels Enoch goes to Azazel and tells him what his fate will be and why.
Recommended publications
  • Faith in the Angels
    Angels Faith in the and People who deserve the Salaat of Allah’s Angels and those who deserve their La’nah Compiled by Shawana A. Aziz Published by Quran Sunnah Educational Programs www.qsep.com Contents About the Book................................................................................i Faith in the Angels Faith in the Angels comprises of four important issues.................05 Creation........................................................................................07 Seeing the Angels..........................................................................08 Ability to take on different forms...................................................08 Number.........................................................................................09 Dwelling.......................................................................................10 Status..........................................................................................10 Who are superior, sons of Adam or angels?.................................11 Angel’s prostration before Adam � was an honor bestowed upon him......................................................................................12 Iblees was ordered to prostrate before Adam, though He was not an Angel........................................................................................13 The Arab pagans claimed that Angels were daughters of Allah......15 The Arab pagans worshiped Angels claiming them to be their intercessors with Allah..........................17 Physical Composition...................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuanian Religious and Ceremonial Terms of Semitic Origin: the Phenomenon of Azazel
    Etnolingwistyka 29 Lublin 2017 I. Rozprawy i analizy DOI: 10.17951/et.2017.29.257 Rolandas K r e g ž d y s (Vilnius, Lithuanian Culture Research Institute) Lithuanian religious and ceremonial terms of semitic origin: the phenomenon of Azazel The article deals with the so-called phenomenon of Azazel, i.e. the scape- goat icon, examples of which can be found in the Dictionary of the Lithuanian Language and in dialectal sources. Its relics are also traced in three-day Shro- vetide rites before the Lenten fast, which begins on Ash Wednesday (Shrove Tuesday in Lithuania), and in the Easter feast from Piev˙enaiin Samogitia (the histrionic so-called “Easter Jews” vigil on the night before Easter). Using different methods of investigating cultural realia, i.e. cross-cultural comparison and linguistic analysis (based on the inner and external reconstruction (or historical) methodology), two main types of religious terms of Semitic origin registered in the Dictionary of the Lithuanian Language and dialectal sources are identified: (i) Hebraisms with neutral or hereditary connotation; and (ii) pejoratives or semantically modified words with an anti-Semitic background. The paper also explains the origin of the xenophobic elements of the Easter feast, the way it has been celebrated in Piev˙enaiuntil today. Key words: Azazel/scapegoat phenomenon; religious terms; ceremonial terms; Hebraism; pejorative; semantically modified words Introduction: a short prehistory of the origin and purport of the scapegoat or Azazel icon The mythonym of Azazel or Hazazel (Azael, Azozel)1 is traditionally explained as an appellative of one of the chiefs of the 200 fallen angels 1 The exact meaning of the proper name is ambiguous: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Storyworld Dynamics of Supernatural
    PRODUCTIONS / MARKETS / STRATEGIES ANGELS, DEMONS AND WHATEVER COMES NEXT: THE STORYWORLD DYNAMICS OF SUPERNATURAL FLORENT FAVARD Name Florent Favard the series with an analysis of its writing, production and Academic centre IECA, Université de Lorraine reception contexts, and divides the long-running series into E-mail address [email protected] four eras, each defined by a specific showrunner. It starts by exploring the context of the series’ creation, before KEYWORDS cataloguing the shifting dynamics of the storyworld during Storyworld; narratology; writing; ethos; showrunner. the four eras: the ‘stealth teleological’ approach of series creator Eric Kripke; the complex reconfigurations of the Sera Gamble era; the ‘mythology reboot’ of the Jeremy ABSTRACT Carver era; and the ever-increasing stakes and expansionist This paper explores the narrative dynamics of the fantasy dynamics of the Andrew Dabb era. The aim of this paper television series Supernatural (2005-) in order to better is to show how ‘periodising’ a long-running series by using understand how this particular program has become a close-reading and studying the dynamics of a storyworld backbone of The CW network. Combining formal and can expand and complete analysis focused on audiences contextual narratologies, it blends a close-reading of and the genesis of the text. 19 SERIES VOLUME IV, Nº 2, WINTER 2018: 19-26 DOI https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-454X/8164 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TV SERIAL NARRATIVES ISSN 2421-454X INVESTIGATING THE CW PRODUCTIONS / MARKETS / STRATEGIES > FLORENT FAVARD ANGELS, DEMONS AND WHATEVER COMES NEXT: THE STORYWORLD DYNAMICS OF SUPERNATURAL The Apocalypse has just been averted.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrews University Seminary Studies for 1994
    Andrews University SEMINARY S1UDIES Volume 32 cNumber. 3 Autumn 1994 Andrews University Press ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES The Journal of the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary of Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan 49104, U.S.A. Editor: NANCY J. VYHMEISTER Associate Editor: JERRY MOON Book Review Editor: JERRY MOON Editor Emeritus: KENNETH A. STRAND Consulting Editors: ROBERT M. JOHNSTON, JON PAULIEN, RANDALL W. YOUNKER Copy Editor: LEONA G. RUNNING Editorial Assistant: SALLY KIASIONG-ANDRIAMIARISOA Circulation Manager: MATTHEW M. KENT Data Processor: JENNIFER KHARBTENG Editorial and Circulation Offices: Andrews University Seminar Studies, Seminary Hall, Andrews University Berrien Springs, MI 49104-1500, U.S.A. Phone: (616) 471-6023 Fax: (616) 471-6202 Electronic Mail: [email protected] A refereed journal, ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES provides a scholarly venue, within the context of biblical faith, for the presentation of research in the area of religious and biblical studies. A USS publishes research articles and brief notes on the following topics: biblical archaeology and history of antiquity; Hebrew Bible; New Testament; church history of all periods; historical, biblical, and systematic theology; ethics; history of religions; and missions. Selected research articles on ministry and Christian education may also be included. The opinions expressed in articles, brief notes, book reviews, etc., are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors nor those of the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary. Subscription Information: ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES is published in the Spring, Summer, and Autumn. The subscription rate for 1995 is as follows: U.S.A. Foreign (in U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Azazel Historically, the Word Azazel Is an Idea and Rarely an Incarnate Demon
    Azazel Historically, the word azazel is an idea and rarely an incarnate demon. Figure 1 Possible sigil of Azazel. Modern writings use the sigil for the planet Saturn as well. Vayikra (Leviticus) The earliest known mention of the word Azazel in Jewish texts appears in the late seventh century B.C. which is the third of the five books of the Torah. To modern American ( וַיִּקְרָ א ) book called the Vayikra Christians, this books is Leviticus because of its discussion of the Levites. In Leviticus 16, two goats are placed before the temple for selection in an offering. A lot is cast. One Goat is then sacrificed to Yahweh and the other goats is said to outwardly bear all the sends of those making the sacrifice. The text The general translation .( לַעֲזָאזֵל ) specifically says one goat was chosen for Yahweh and the for Az azel of the words is “absolute removal.” Another set of Hebrew scholars translate Azazel in old Hebrew translates as "az" (strong/rough) and "el" (strong/God). The azazel goat, often called the scapegoat then is taken away. A number of scholars have concluded that “azazel” refers to a series of mountains near Jerusalem with steep cliffs. Fragmentary records suggest that bizarre Yahweh ritual was carried out on the goat. According to research, a red rope was tied to the goat and to an altar next to jagged cliff. The goat is pushed over the cliff’s edge and torn to pieces by the cliff walls as it falls. The bottom of the cliff was a desert that was considered the realm of the “se'irim” class of demons.
    [Show full text]
  • De-Demonising the Old Testament
    De-Demonising the Old Testament An Investigation of Azazel , Lilith , Deber , Qeteb and Reshef in the Hebrew Bible Judit M. Blair Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 2008 Declaration I declare that the present thesis has been composed by me, that it represents my own research, and that it has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. ______________________ Judit M. Blair ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people to thank and acknowledge for their support and help over the past years. Firstly I would like to thank the School of Divinity for the scholarship and the opportunity they provided me in being able to do this PhD. I would like to thank my ‘numerous’ supervisors who have given of their time, energy and knowledge in making this thesis possible: To Professor Hans Barstad for his patience, advice and guiding hand, in particular for his ‘adopting’ me as his own. For his understanding and help with German I am most grateful. To Dr Peter Hayman for giving of his own time to help me in learning Hebrew, then accepting me to study for a PhD, and in particular for his attention to detail. To Professor Nick Wyatt who supervised my Masters and PhD before his retirement for his advice and support. I would also like to thank the staff at New College Library for their assistance at all times, and Dr Jessie Paterson and Bronwen Currie for computer support. My fellow colleagues have provided feedback and helpful criticism and I would especially like to thank all members of HOTS-lite I have known over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT the Women of Supernatural: More Than
    ABSTRACT The Women of Supernatural: More than Stereotypes Miranda B. Leddy, M.A. Mentor: Mia Moody-Ramirez, Ph.D. This critical discourse analysis of the American horror television show, Supernatural, uses a gender perspective to assess the stereotypes and female characters in the popular series. As part of this study 34 episodes of Supernatural and 19 female characters were analyzed. Findings indicate that while the target audience for Supernatural is women, the show tends to portray them in traditional, feminine, and horror genre stereotypes. The purpose of this thesis is twofold: 1) to provide a description of the types of female characters prevalent in the early seasons of Supernatural including mother-figures, victims, and monsters, and 2) to describe the changes that take place in the later seasons when the female characters no longer fit into feminine or horror stereotypes. Findings indicate that female characters of Supernatural have evolved throughout the seasons of the show and are more than just background characters in need of rescue. These findings are important because they illustrate that representations of women in television are not always based on stereotypes, and that the horror genre is evolving and beginning to depict strong female characters that are brave, intellectual leaders instead of victims being rescued by men. The female audience will be exposed to a more accurate portrayal of women to which they can relate and be inspired. Copyright © 2014 by Miranda B. Leddy All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Tables
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMAGES of ANGELS in IRANIAN ART a Civilization Interaction in a Comparative Study
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITY STUD Vol 3, No 1, 2011 ISSN: 1309-8063 (Online) THE IMAGES OF ANGELS IN IRANIAN ART A Civilization Interaction in a Comparative Study Maryam Lari Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr Branch, Iran Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture No. 19, Noor-e-Behesht, Zafar Str., Tehran, Iran. Email: [email protected] Abstract This essay surveys the images of angels in the Iranian paintings particularly in 18 th (under Safavid dynasty) and 19 th (under Qajar dynasty) centuries in Iran. As a background, the concept of Angel has been briefly studied in four categories of Persian mythology, Iranian epic, Islamic culture and folk stories. The images of angels altered in different periods which were directly related to cultural interaction between "East" and "West". The angels in Safavid period were ideal images in a utopian atmosphere and their pictorial appearances were representations of philosophical and metaphorical concepts. Illustrating the angels for the Safavid artists was actually a way to penetrate into the concepts world. It is essential to mention that the challenge of "East" and "West" which had begun in Safavid period, reached to its critical summit in Qajar era. It was due to various reasons; Travelling abroad, getting acquaintance with modern ideas, constitutionalism movement, entering new technology such as photography and printing industry were some of the most influential causes which affected all aspects of Qajar society. Idealistic vision of Safavid painters changed into naturalistic one and the imaginary illustrations of angels altered to more realistic images. Many progressive newspapers began to be published in which the angels were represented as the symbols of freedom, homeland and constitutionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Enoch (1 Enoch) the Book of the Secrets of Enoch (2 Enoch) the Hebrew Book of Enoch (3 Enoch)
    THE BOOKS OF ENOCH The Book of Enoch (1 Enoch) The Book of the Secrets of Enoch (2 Enoch) The Hebrew Book of Enoch (3 Enoch) AND OTHER APOCRYPHA OF THE OLD TESTAMENT 1 3rd Edition - April 2010 INDEX THE BOOK OF ENOCH ( 1 ENOCH ) page 4 THE BOOK OF THE SECRETS OF ENOCH ( 2 ENOCH ) page 53 THE HEBREW BOOK OF ENOCH ( 3 ENOCH ) page 70 Other Apocrypha VITA ADAE ET EVAE ( Latin Life of Adam and Eve ) page 104 APOCALYPSIS MOSIS ( Greek Life of Adam and Eve ) page 112 THE SLAVONIC LIFE OF ADAM AND EVE page 120 THE APOCALYPSIS OF ADAM page 123 THE TESTAMENT OF ADAM page 128 THE APOCALYPSE OF ABRAHAM page 153 THE TESTAMENT OF ABRAHAM page 145 THE TESTAMENT OF ISAAC page 160 THE TESTAMENT OF JACOB page 167 THE LADDER OF JACOB page 173 THE ASSUMPTION OF MOSES page 177 THE BOOK OF JUBILEES page 185 2 3 THE BOOK OF ENOCH THE INTRODUCTION ( From Wikipedia ) The Book of Enoch (also 1Enoch) is an ancient Jewish religious work, ascribed to Enoch, the great- BOOK OF ENOCH grandfather of Noah. It is not regarded as scripture by Jews or any Christian group, apart from the translation by M. Knibb of the Ethiopian text in the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, which to this day regards it to be canonical. S.O.A.S. Library at the University of London. Western scholars currently assert that its older sections (mainly in the Book of the Watchers) date from about 300 BC and the latest part (Book of Parables) probably was composed at the end of the 1st century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Theology of Supernatural
    religions Article Theology of Supernatural Pavel Nosachev School of Philosophy and Cultural Studies, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] Received: 15 October 2020; Accepted: 1 December 2020; Published: 4 December 2020 Abstract: The main research issues of the article are the determination of the genesis of theology created in Supernatural and the understanding of ways in which this show transforms a traditional Christian theological narrative. The methodological framework of the article, on the one hand, is the theory of the occulture (C. Partridge), and on the other, the narrative theory proposed in U. Eco’s semiotic model. C. Partridge successfully described modern religious popular culture as a coexistence of abstract Eastern good (the idea of the transcendent Absolute, self-spirituality) and Western personified evil. The ideal confirmation of this thesis is Supernatural, since it was the bricolage game with images of Christian evil that became the cornerstone of its popularity. In the 15 seasons of its existence, Supernatural, conceived as a story of two evil-hunting brothers wrapped in a collection of urban legends, has turned into a global panorama of world demonology while touching on the nature of evil, the world order, theodicy, the image of God, etc. In fact, this show creates a new demonology, angelology, and eschatology. The article states that the narrative topics of Supernatural are based on two themes, i.e., the theology of the spiritual war of the third wave of charismatic Protestantism and the occult outlooks derived from Emmanuel Swedenborg’s system. The main topic of this article is the role of monotheistic mythology in Supernatural.
    [Show full text]
  • Divine Manifestations in the Slavonic Pseudepigrapha Orientalia Judaica Christiana
    Divine Manifestations in the Slavonic Pseudepigrapha Orientalia Judaica Christiana 2 Orientalia Judaica Christiana, the Christian Orient and its Jewish Heritage, is dedicated, first of all, to the afterlife of the Jewish Second Temple traditions within the traditions of the Christian East. A second area of exploration is some priestly (non-Talmudic) Jewish traditions that survived in the Christian environment Divine Manifestations in the Slavonic Pseudepigrapha Andrei Orlov govg'ms press 2009 For law and June Fair ... Then the old man stood up and stretched his hands to­ wards heaven. His fingers became like ten lamps of fire and he said to him, "If you will, you can become all flame/5 Apophthegmata Patrum, Joseph of Panephysis, 7. Abba Bessarion, at the point of death, said, "The monk ought to be as the Cherubim and the Seraphim: all eye." Apophthegmata Patrum, Bessarion, 11. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface xv Locations of the Original Publications xvii List of Abbreviations xix INTRODUCTION. The Kavod and Shem Paradigms and Divine Manifestations in the Slavonic Pseudepigrapha 1 Silvanus and Anthony. 3 Moses and Elijah 8 Enoch and Abraham 12 PART I: THE DIVINE BODY TRADITIONS 19 "Without Measure and Without Analogy": The Tradition of the Divine Body in 2 (Slavonic) Enoch 21 Introduction 21 Adamic Tradition of 2 Enoch 23 The Corporeality of the Protoplast 26 From the Four Corners of the World 29 The Measure of the Divine Body. 34 Bodily Ascent 37 Adam and Enoch: "Two Powers" in Heaven 38 Two Bodies Created According to the Likeness of the Third One 43 The Pillar of the World: The Eschatological Role of the Seventh Antediluvian Hero in 2 (Slavonic) Enoch 49 Introduction 49 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Iblees Meaning Iblees Is the Name for the Devil in the Qur'an. Although The
    Iblees Meaning Iblees is the name for the devil in the Qur'an. Although the term "devil" comes from the Greek diabolos, the Muslims derived the name from the Arabic, balasa, "he despaired," which can be interpreted "despaired of the mercy of God" but he is also al-Shairan, Satan, and "the enemy of God." The latter aspect of Satan is a commonly shared belief of both Muslims and Christians meaning "he ,سبسل سس The word "Iblis" may be derived from the Arabic verbal root balasa despaired"; therefore, the linguistic meaning of Iblis would be "he/it that causes despair". However, some maintain an etymological derivation from the Greek "Diabolos", from which the English word "Devil" is derived as well. is both a noun and an adjective. As (ش-ط-ن from the root šṭn ,شيطان) "Shayṭān" "Satan" a noun it means "mischief" and as an adjective it means "adversarial," "opposing," or "evil." In popular Islamic culture, Shaitan is often simply translated as "The Devil," but can refer to any of the beings who rebelled against God. Shaytan has a similar meaning and origin to the English word Satan. Family Of iblees 1.Iblees' Wife name is Tartaba and she is with him since beginning. 2. Iblis also doesn't know how many children he has 3. 5 of his sons are Tabar, Aawar, Masaout, Waasim and Zakanbar Tabar puts disorder, confusion, intricacy and distraction of mind in the minds of people. Aawar temps people to do evil things. Masaout tempts people to lie and decieve Waasim puts figts between relationships & families and puts fitna in society.
    [Show full text]