Origin of Shafter, Whalen. and Lazy X Ranch Lake Basins, Andrews County, Texas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Origin of Shafter, Whalen. and Lazy X Ranch Lake Basins, Andrews County, Texas ORIGIN OF SHAFTER, WHALEN. AND LAZY X RANCH LAKE BASINS, ANDREWS COUNTY, TEXAS by ROGER M. DOCKERY, B.S. A THESIS IN GEOLOGY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved Accepted December 1989 C^'^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to Dr. C.C. Reeves, Jr., for providing this project and for his friendship, advice and guidance, to Dr. S.E. Cebull and Dr. A.D. Jacka for their advice and serving as committee members, and to Dr. G.B. Asquith for his helpful advice. I would like to thank the Midland Energy Library tor providing data used for this project, and the Texas Tech Department of Geosciences for financial support. Thanks to Judy Vincent and Dan McCrummen for their helpful suggestions. I am very grateful to my parents for their never- ending love and support, without their support I could not have completed this project. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF FIGURES iv CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 Location and Description of Study Area 1 Purpose of Study 5 Method of Study 6 Previous Studies 7 II. REGIONAL GEOLOGY 14 Structure 14 Stratigraphy 18 III. GEOLOGY OF SHAFTER, WHALEN, AND LAZY X RANCH BASINS 25 Permian Salt Dissolution 26 Structural Displacement in the Triassic 42 Structural Displacement on the Base of the Ogallala Formation 51 IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 56 BIBLIOGRAPHY 62 APPENDICES A. SHAFTER LAKE WELL LOCATIONS 69 B . WHALEN LAKE WELL LOCATIONS 7 5 C. LAZY X RANCH DEPRESSION WELL LOCATIONS 79 111 LIST OF FIGURES Index map of the Southern High Plains showing the location of Andrews County, Texas. (After Finley and Gustavson, 1981) 2 Index map of Andrews County, Texas, showing the locations of Shafter Lake, Whalen Lake and I the Lazy X Ranch Depression 3 n. Stratigraphic column showing formations examined and stratigraphic positions of marker beds f correlated in the study area 8 t 4. Map of Permian salt dissolution limits in the Texas Panhandle. (Copied from Gustavson et al., 1980) 11 5. Index map of the major structural features of West Texas. Asterisk (*) indicates location of the study area 15 |i 6. Well location map of the Shafter Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present playa area 27 7. North-South cross section of the Shafter Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas 28 I 8. East-West cross section of the Shafter Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas 29 9. Structure map on the Rustler Formation in the Shafter Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present playa area 31 10. Well location map of the Whalen Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present playa area 32 11. North-South cross section of the Whalen Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas 33 12. East-West cross section of the Whalen Lake Basin area, Andrews County. Texas 34 iv 13. Structure map on the Rustler Formation in the Whalen Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present playa area....36 14. Well location map of the Lazy X Ranch Depression area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present basin area 37 l^. North-South cross setion of the Lazy X Ranch Depression area, Andrews County, Texas 38 16. East-West cross section of the Lazy X Ranch Depression area, Andrews County, Texas 40 17. Structure map on the Rustler Formation in the Lazy X Ranch Depression area, Andrews County. Texas. The dotted area represents the present basin area 41 18. Structure map on Marker Bed #4 in the Shafter Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present playa area 43 19. Structure map on Marker Bed #5 in the Shafter Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present playa area 44 20. Structure map on Marker Bed #4 in the Whalen Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present playa area 47 21. Structure map on Marker Bed #5 in the Whalen Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present playa area 48 22. Structure map on Marker Bed #4 in the Lazy X Ranch Depression area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present basin area 49 23. Structure map on Marker Bed #5 in the Lazy X Ranch Depression area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present basin area 50 24. Structure map on the base of the Ogallala Formation in the Shafter Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present playa area 52 Structure map on the base of the Ogallala ]5. Formation in the Whalen Lake Basin area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present playa area , 53 26. Structure map on the base of the Ogallala Formation in the Lazy X Ranch Depression area, Andrews County, Texas. The dotted area represents the present basin area 55 VI CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Location and Description of Study Area Andrews County, Texas, lies in the southern part of the Southern High Plains of West Texas (Fig. 1). The specific study areas of Shafter Lake, Whalen Lake, and the Lazy X Ranch Depression, are all located west of Andrews in Andrews County, Texas (Fig. 2). The Southern High Plains, also known as the Llano Estacado, is the eroded remnant of a vast piediment alluvial plain which formed on the eastern slope of the southern Rocky Mountains during Tertiary time. Bordered on the north by the Canadian River valley, on the east by the "Caprock" Escarpment, on the west by the Mescalero Escarpment, and on the south by the Edwards Plateau, the essentially flat, plateau-like surface of the Southern High Plains has an average southeasterly slope of approximately 8 to 10 feet per mile. Local relief is provided by tens of thousands of natural depressions with maximum relief occuring around the larger saline lake basins where sand dunes have accumulated along the downwind flanks. The Southern High Plains is a semi-arid region with an average precipitation of 18 to 20 inches per year, but 1 OHJ /'. l;.;-;-:J «oulMrnHlgl<nfln> AfKb^M Cauntr Figure 1. Index map of the Southern High Plains showing the location of Andrews County, Texas. (After Finley and Gustavson, 1981) X >1 CJ> N c ro •« J 5 0 O x: x; W J-) »n n c ro ro X 0) (U E- ^ ro . J >i 4J c C (U 3 r-l 0 ro u s: 3: m 5 * (U 0) ;j ii -o ro c J < j-i U-4 0) 0 JJ w a ro ro J= E w X «-i C cj 0 0 T! •H c m O M C tn 0 Q) -H Ul . JJ c rs ro o U Q <u 0 1^ r^ r^ 3 "u Di QJ c •H x: ro lu JJ Cti with an average annual evaporation of approximately 60 ' inches. The prevailing wind direction is dependent upon time of year; winds from the southeast prevail during the summer months with southwest winds prevailing during the remainder of the year. The average wind speeds are approximately 10.4 miles per hour (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey, 1974). Climatic conditions for Andrews County (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey, 1974) are considered cool-temperate and dry with low precipitation and high evaporation. Average precipitation is approximately 13.89 inches per year, the majority falling between April and October. Evaporation is reported by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey (1974) to be approximately 58 inches greater than the annual precipitation. The Shafter Lake Basin is located approximately 6.8 miles north and 4.5 miles west of Andrews, Texas (Fig. 2). The Whalen Lake Basin is located approximately 5.9 miles north and 14.8 miles west of Andrews (Fig. 2), and about 9.8 miles west of the Shafter Basin. The Lazy X Ranch Depression, named for the Lazy X Ranch, is located about 6.1 miles due west of Andrews and approximately 6.8 miles south of the Shafter Lake Basin (Fig. 2). However, whereas both the Shafter and Whalen basins contain saline playas, the Lazy X Ranch Basin is covered by the entisol of the Krade soil series, and the aridisols of the Blakeney, Conger, and Ratliff soil series (United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey, 1974), no lacustrine playa is obvious. Purpose of Study Approximately 17,000 small playa lake basins, which intermittently contain freshwater during climatically wet periods, exist on the Texas portion of the Southern High Plains of West Texas (Parks, 1967). Also present throughout the West Texas and eastern New Mexico area are at least 44 larger lake basins (Reeves, 1989) which tend to contain salty water and/or salt encrusted playas. Wood and Jones (1988) classify these basins as saline based on high pH values and high concentrations of sulfate and chloride; however, studies show that pH values are seldom over 8.0, thus the term "saline" is preferred. Recent studies (Gustavson and others, 1980; Reeves and Temple, 1986; Reeves, 1989) of the large saline basins reveal that some are underlain by areas of deep- seated Permian salt dissolution. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to determine if Shafter, Whalen, and the smaller Lazy X Ranch basins in Andrews County, Texas, are surficial manifestations reflecting the dissolution 6 of underlying Permian salt beds or simply the result of surficial weathering processes.
Recommended publications
  • Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas Jon T. Ehrhart Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds Part of the Geology Commons, Hydrology Commons, and the Speleology Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Ehrhart, Jon T., "Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 66. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/66 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This thesis is available at SFA ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/66 Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas By Jon Ehrhart, B.S. Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Stephen F. Austin State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science STEPHEN F.
    [Show full text]
  • Salado Formation Followed
    GW -^SZ-i^ GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE YEAR(S): B. QUICK, Inc. 3340 Quail View Drive • Nashville, TN 37214 Phone: (615) 874-1077 • Fax: (615) 386-0110 Email: [email protected] November 12,2002 Mr Roger Anderson Environmental Bureau Chief New Mexico OCD 1220 S. ST. Francis Dr. 1 Santa Fe, NM 87507 Re: Class I Disposal Wells Dear Roger, I am still very interested in getting the disposal wells into salt caverns in Monument approved by OCD. It is my sincere belief that a Class I Disposal Well would be benefical to present and future industry in New Mexico. I suspect that one of my problems has been my distance from the property. I am hoping to find a local company or individuals who can be more on top of this project. In the past conditions have not justified the capital investment to permit, build and operate these wells and compete with surface disposal. Have there been any changes in OCD policy that might effect the permitting of these wells? If so, would you please send me any pretinent documents? Sincerely, Cc: Lori Wrotenbery i aoie or moments rage i uu Ctoraeferiz&MoiHi ©ff Bedded Satt fltoir Storage Caverns Case Stundy from the Midlamdl Basim Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology The University of Texas at Austin AUG1 0R9 9 Environmental Bureau Introduction to the Problem °" Conservation D/ws/on About solution-mined caverns l^Btg*** Geolojy_ofsalt Purpose, scope, and methods of our study Previous work: geologic setting of the bedded salt in the Permian Basin J^rV^W^' " Stratigraphic Units and Type Logs s Midland Basin stratigraphy
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Kitchen Cove 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Eddy County, New Mexico by Colin T
    Geologic Map of the Kitchen Cove 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Eddy County, New Mexico By Colin T. Cikoski1 1New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 June 2019 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Open-file Digital Geologic Map OF-GM 276 Scale 1:24,000 This work was supported by the U.S. Geological Survey, National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (STATEMAP) under USGS Cooperative Agreement G18AC00201 and the New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources. New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, New Mexico, 87801-4796 The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government or the State of New Mexico. Executive Summary The Kitchen Cove quadrangle lies along the northwestern margin of the Guadalupian Delaware basin southwest of Carlsbad, New Mexico. The oldest rocks exposed are Guadalupian (upper Permian) carbonate rocks of the Seven Rivers Formation of the Artesia Group, which is sequentially overlain by similar strata of the Yates and Tansill Formations of the same Group. Each of these consists dominantly of dolomitic beds with lesser fine-grained siliciclastic intervals, which accumulated in a marine or marginal-marine backreef or shelf environment. These strata grade laterally basinward (here, eastward) either at the surface or in the subsurface into the Capitan Limestone, a massive fossiliferous “reef complex” that lay along the Guadalupian Delaware basin margin and is locally exposed on the quadrangle at the mouths of Dark Canyon and Kitchen Cove.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Geologic History of Cave Development in the Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico
    Carol A. Hill - Overview of the geologic history of cave development in the Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 62(2): 60-71. OVERVIEW OF THE GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF CAVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE GUADALUPE MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO CAROL A. HILL 17 El Arco Drive, Albuquerque, NM 87123-9542 USA [email protected] The sequence of events relating to the geologic history of cave development in the Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico, traces from the Permian to the present. In the Late Permian, the reef, forereef, and backreef units of the Capitan Reef Complex were deposited, and the arrangement, differential dolomitization, jointing, and folding of these stratigraphic units have influenced cave development since that time. Four episodes of karsification occurred in the Guadalupe Mountains: Stage 1 fissure caves (Late Permian) developed primarily along zones of weakness at the reef/backreef contact; Stage 2 spongework caves (Mesozoic) developed as small interconnected dissolution cavities during limestone mesogenesis; Stage 3 thermal caves (Miocene?) formed by dissolution of hydrothermal water; Stage 4 sulfuric acid caves (Miocene-Pleistocene) formed by H2S-sulfuric acid dissolution derived hypogenically from hydro- carbons. This last episode is reponsible for the large caves in the Guadalupe Mountains containing gyp- sum blocks/rinds, native sulfur, endellite, alunite, and other deposits related to a sulfuric acid speleoge- netic mechanism. This paper provides an overview of events affecting cave of the Delaware Basin. The Capitan Formation in the Delaware development in the Guadalupe Mountains of New Mexico. Basin is exposed in the northwestern Guadalupe Mountains Table 1 outlines the sequence of karst events, integrated with section, the southwestern Apache Mountains section, and the the regional geology.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Petroleum Geology of Santa Rosa Sandstone (Triassic), Northeast New Mexico
    COVER—Well-developed primary porosity in Santa Rosa sandstone, 800-810 ft, Husky Oil Co. and General Crude Oil Co. No. 1 Hanchett State, Sec. 16, T. 8 N., R. 24 E., Guadalupe County, New Mexico. Circular 193 New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources A DIVISION OF NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY Subsurface petroleum geology of Santa Rosa Sandstone (Triassic), northeast New Mexico by Ronald F. Broadhead New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources SOCORRO 1984 111 Contents A B S T R A C T 5 DOCKUM SEDIMENTOLOGY 13 INTRODUCTION 5 STRUCTURE 15 PETROLEUM METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 5 OCCURRENCES 17 STRATIGRAPHY 9 PETROGRAPHY AND RESERVOIR SAN ANDRES FORMATION (PERMIAN: GE OL O G Y 1 7 LEONARDIAN) 9 LOWER SANDSTONE UNIT OF SANTA ROSA ARTESIA GROUP (PERMIAN: GUADALUPIAN) 9 SANDSTONE 19 Grayburg-Queen unit 9 UPPER SANDSTONE UNIT OF SANTA ROSA Seven Rivers Formation 10 SANDSTONE 19 Yates-Tansill unit 10 CUERVO MEMBER OF CHINLE FORMATION 19 BERNAL FORMATION PETROLEUM POTENTIAL OF SANTA ROSA (PERMIAN: GUADALUPIAN) 10 SANDSTONE AND CUERVO MEMBER OF DOCKUM GROUP (TRIASSIC) 11 CHINLE FORMATION 20 Santa Rosa Sandstone 11 SANTA ROSA SANDSTONE 20 Lower sandstone unit 12 CUERVO MEMBER OF CHINLE Middle mudstone unit 12 FORMATION 21 REFERENCES 21 Upper sandstone unit 12 Chinle Formation 13 Lower shale member 13 Cuervo Sandstone Member 13 Upper shale member 13 Redonda Formation 13 Figures 1—Study area and locations of tar-sand deposits 6 2—Stratigraphic chart of Upper Permian and Triassic rocks in northeast New Mexico 9 3—(in pocket)—East-west
    [Show full text]
  • Outcropping Permian Shelf Formations of Eastern New Mexico Vincent C
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/23 Outcropping Permian shelf formations of eastern New Mexico Vincent C. Kelley, 1972, pp. 72-78 in: East-Central New Mexico, Kelley, V. C.; Trauger, F. D.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 23rd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 236 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1972 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitan Reef Complex Structure and Stratigraphy
    Capitan Reef Complex Structure and Stratigraphy Report by Allan Standen, P.G. Steve Finch, P.G. Randy Williams, P.G., Beronica Lee-Brand, P.G. Assisted by Paul Kirby Texas Water Development Board Contract Number 0804830794 September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive summary....................................................................................................................1 2. Introduction................................................................................................................................2 3. Study area geology.....................................................................................................................4 3.1 Stratigraphy ........................................................................................................................4 3.1.1 Bone Spring Limestone...........................................................................................9 3.1.2 San Andres Formation ............................................................................................9 3.1.3 Delaware Mountain Group .....................................................................................9 3.1.4 Capitan Reef Complex..........................................................................................10 3.1.5 Artesia Group........................................................................................................11 3.1.6 Castile and Salado Formations..............................................................................11 3.1.7 Rustler Formation
    [Show full text]
  • "Geology & Ground-Water Conditions in Southern Lea County, New
    ItI *1. I.4 GROUND-WTATER REPORT 6 an4 A.; Geology and Ground-Water 54 Conditions in Southern I Lea County, New Mexico by ALEXANDER NICHOLSON, Jr. C,'I and ALFRLD CLEBSCH, JR. UN!TED STATES GEOLOGICAL SUR'VEY i I I i i I i I' ;it it. STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES .t64 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO Contents Page NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY ABSTRACT ............................................. 1 E. J. Workman, President INTRODUCTION ....................................... 2 Location and area ....................................... 2 History and scope of investigation ......................... 2 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Previous investigations and acknowledgments ............... 4 Well-numbering system ................................. 5 Alvin J. Thompson, Direclor GEOGRAPHY ............... 7 Topography and drainage ................................ 7 Mescalero Ridge and High Plains ....................... 7 THE REGENTS Querecho Plains and Laguna Valley ..................... 9 Grama Ridge area ..................................... 11 MEEMBERS Ex OFFICIO Eunice Plain ......................................... 12 Monument Draw ................................... 12 TheHonorable Edwin L. Mechern ...... Governor of New Mexico Rattlesnake Ridge area ................................ 13 Tom Wiley ............. Superintendent of Public Instruction San Simon Swale ...................................... 13 Antelope Ridge area .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Apache Mountains, Trans-Pecos Texas
    GEOLOGY OF APACHE MOUNTAINS, TRANS-PECOS TEXAS John William Wood University of Texas, Ph.D. thesis, 241 p., 10 sections, 6 diagrams, 40 photos, June, 1965. ABSTRACT The Apache Mountains of southeastern Culberson County, Texas, are com- posed of Permian marine rocks deposited over truncated Paleozoic formations along part of the southwest margin of the Delaware Basin. The western sector of the range, a broadly developed half-dome, is dominated by modified horst-and-graben structure superposed on shelf, shelf-margin, and basin facies ranging in age from Leonardian to Ochoan. The eastern two-thirds of the range is an exhumed Guadalupian reef complex, the surface structure of which is the elongate, southeast-plunging Apache anticline. The oldest exposed rocks are Leonardian in age and compose the upper part of the Victorio Peak Limestone. The VictorioPeakcrops out in an isolated ridge at the western end of the range. The siltstone, dolomite, and limestone within the unit probably formed as shallow-watershelf-margin deposits. In the same ridge, the Victorio Peak is conformably overlain by shale, silt stone, and lime- stone of the Cutoff Shale. The age of at least the upper part of the Cutoff is Guadalupian. As a result of uplift, erosion, and subsequent subsidence a tongue of Cherry Canyon basin- facies oversteps trucated Cutoff beds. The Munn Formationcrops out along the western base of the range and makes up the southwestern ridges. The two members of the Munn are composed of dolomite, siltstone, and limestone deposited as shelf and shelf-margin facies. The "backbone" of the Apache Mountains is a southeast trending, massive carbonate lithosome, the Capitan Limestone, which is flanked on the northeast by a fault-line scarp and on the southwest by ridges composed of bedded back- reef dolomite and siltstone of the Seven Rivers, Yates, and Tansill formations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oil and Gas Resources of New Mexico SECOND EDITION
    NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MINES BULLETIN 18 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES PLATE 1 Ship Rock, northwestern San Juan County. An igneous intrusion with radiating dikes. In the Rattle- snake pool, less than five miles away, oil and gas have accumulated in Cretaceous strata similar to those in the foreground. (Spence Air Photos.) NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MINES STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES RICHARD H. REECE President and Director BULLETIN NO. 18 The Oil and Gas Resources of New Mexico SECOND EDITION Compiled by ROBERT L. BATES Geologist, State Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO 1942 CONTENTS Page The State Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources ---------------------------------------------------- 12 Board of Regents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 Introduction, by Robert L. Bates -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 General statement ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Purpose and scope of the report -------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Acknowledgments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------14 Geography and general geology, after D. E. Winchester ---------------------------------------------- 15 The Rocks ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 General statement, by Robert L. Bates ------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Discouery Wells Drilled in New Mexico in 1Gg1
    Oiland gas discouery wells drilled in NewMexico in 1gg1 byRonald F. Broadhead, New Mexico Bureau of Minesand Mineral Resources Introduction completedin 1991,up 5% from the 1,549 up from 803completions in 1990;585 wells More wells were drilled for oil and sas wells completed in 1990but down 43% were completedas oil producersand 184 in New Mexicoin 1991than in tSgO.Oitu from the rccord 2,867 wells completed in wells were completed as gas producers obtained from the New Mexico Oil Con- 1981.In the PermianBasin, southeast New while 120wells were plugged and aban- servationDvision indicate1,b24 wells were Mexico,889 wells werecompleted in 199L, doned, resulting in a successrale of87Vo. In the San Juan Basin, northwest New Mexico,735 wells werecompleted int997, down from 746 completionsin 1990;57 wells were completedas oil producersand 655wells were completedas gas produc- Sali Jren Li L erswhile 23wells wereplugged and aban- doned, resulting in a successrate of.97Vo. In addition, two wells were completedin the west Bravo dome carbondioxide gas unit of southern Harding County. Three explorationand developmentwells were completedin Colfax County. Totalfootage of hole drilled in 1991was 5.522million ft, up 3% from 6.313million ft drilled in 1990. The average footage drilled per well in 1991was 4,015ft,59-ft lessthan the averagewell drilled in 1990. The downturn in drilling over the past 10 years has been accompaniedby seri- ously decreasedexploratory efforts. Sev- eral major oil companiesannounced reduction or elimination of onshore ex- ploration effortsin the United States.Ex- i-.liji iuli ploratory activity has rebounded \{J somewhat in the last three years, how- ever.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.)
    Establishing a Tephrochronologic Framework for the Middle Permian (Guadalupian) Type Area and Adjacent Portions of the Delaware Basin and Northwestern Shelf, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico, USA A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) In the Department of Geology Of the McMicken College of Arts and Sciences 2011 by Brian Lee Nicklen B.S. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2001 M.S. University of Cincinnati, 2003 Committee Members: Prof. Warren D. Huff (Ph.D.), Chair Prof. Carlton E. Brett (Ph.D.) Prof. Attila I. Kilinc (Ph.D.) Prof. J. Barry Maynard (Ph.D.) Dr. Gorden L. Bell Jr. Prof. Scott D. Samson (Ph.D.) Abstract DesPite being recognized for many years, bentonites in the Middle Permian (Guadalupian Series) type area of west Texas and southeastern New Mexico, have received little research attention. As these important dePosits act as geologic timelines, they can be used as tools for long distance stratigraphic correlation and high-precision radioisotopic age dating. An important Problem that these bentonites can address is the lack of temporal control for the Guadalupian. This is an important time interval for significant changes in Earth’s climate and biodiversity that include events leading uP to, and Potentially including, the first pulse of a double-Phase mass extinction at the end of the Paleozoic. Also needed is better temporal constraint for key GuadaluPian global chemostratigraPhic and geomagnetic markers. In light of this, the duration of the Guadalupian stages and boundary age estimations need to be updated in order to assess cause and effect of these significant events.
    [Show full text]