"Geology & Ground-Water Conditions in Southern Lea County, New

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ItI *1. I.4 GROUND-WTATER REPORT 6 an4 A.; Geology and Ground-Water 54 Conditions in Southern I Lea County, New Mexico by ALEXANDER NICHOLSON, Jr. C,'I and ALFRLD CLEBSCH, JR. UN!TED STATES GEOLOGICAL SUR'VEY i I I i i I i I' ;it it. STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES .t64 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO Contents Page NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY ABSTRACT ............................................. 1 E. J. Workman, President INTRODUCTION ....................................... 2 Location and area ....................................... 2 History and scope of investigation ......................... 2 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Previous investigations and acknowledgments ............... 4 Well-numbering system ................................. 5 Alvin J. Thompson, Direclor GEOGRAPHY ............... 7 Topography and drainage ................................ 7 Mescalero Ridge and High Plains ....................... 7 THE REGENTS Querecho Plains and Laguna Valley ..................... 9 Grama Ridge area ..................................... 11 MEEMBERS Ex OFFICIO Eunice Plain ......................................... 12 Monument Draw ................................... 12 TheHonorable Edwin L. Mechern ...... Governor of New Mexico Rattlesnake Ridge area ................................ 13 Tom Wiley ............. Superintendent of Public Instruction San Simon Swale ...................................... 13 Antelope Ridge area .................................. 17 APPO1NTED MENMBERS James Dunes area .................................... 18 South Plain .......................................... 18 William G. Abbott .............. Hobbs Climate ................................................ 18 Holm 0. Bursurn, Jr .............. Socorro Population ............................................. 23 Economy .............................................. 24 Thomas M. Cramer . ........................ Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio .. ........................ Albuquerque GEOLOGY .............................................. 28 Stratigraphy ............................................ 28 Eva M. Larrazolo (Mrs. Paul F.) .................. Albuquerque Precambrian rocks .................................... 29 Paleozoic rocks ....................................... 29 Permian or Triassic rocks .............................. 33 Mesozoic rocks ........................................ 33 Triassic ............................................ 35 Jurassic ............................................. 36 Cretaceous ......................................... 37 Cenozoic rocks ........................................ 37 Tertiary ........................................... 37 For sale by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines &8Mineral Resources Quaternary ........................................ 39 Campus Station, Socorro, N. Mlex.-Price $3.00 iii , usc Structure .............................................. 42 Brine contamination of shallow ground water ............... 102 Permian and Triassic unconformity ..................... 43 Movement of brine underground ........................ 103 Red-bed erosion surface ................................ 43 Reported instances of brine contamination ............... 104 Collapse structures .................................... 46 Chemical criteria for recognition of brine contamination . 106 Origin of undrained depressions on the Llano Estacado. 47 Disposal of brine into deep wells ........................ 114 Geologic history ........................................ 48 SUMMARY . GROUND WATER ...................................... 51 REFERENCES . Principles of occurrence ................................. 52 INDEX . Effects of pumping ............. ; 53 121 Ground-water maps ................................... 54 Principal aquifers ....................................... 56 Illustrations Aquifers in rocks of Triassic age ........................ 56 Ogallala formation and Quaternary alluvium ............. 58 TABLES Use of ground water in southern Lea County ................ 61 1. Average annual temperature at stations in southern Lea Irrigation ............................................ 62 County, N. Mex., 1952-55 .......... ..................... 23 Gasoline plants ....................................... 63 2. Summary of industrial production in southern Lea Other industrial uses .................................. 65 County, N. Mex., 1952-55 .......... ..................... 25 Gas stripping plants ................................. 65 3. Stratigraphic units in southern Lea County, N. Mex ....... 30-31 Oil-well and shothole drilling ........................ 65 Carbon-black plants ................................. 67 4. Log of the Triassic section, Continental Oil Co. No. 2 Bell Lake unit SE¼4SWV4 sec. 30, T. 23 S., R. 34 E ............. Oil-pool repressuring .................................. 67 34 Public supplies ....................................... 68 5. Ground-water use, southern Lea County, N. Mex., 1954 .... 62 Eunice ............................................ 68 6. Records of wells in southern Lea County, N. Alex .......... 73-86 Jal ................................................ 69 Oil Center ......................................... 69 7. Records of selected wells in Texas adjacent to southern Monument ......................................... 69 Lea County, N. Mex-. ................................ 87 Maljamar .......................................... 70 8. Chemical analyses of water from wells in southern Stock ................................................ 70 Lea County, N. Mex-. .................................. 92-98 Rural domestic uses ................................... 70 9. Chemical analyses of oil-field waters in southern Lea County, Brine production ....................................... 71 N. Mex.- A. Samples collected from disposal pits or treater discharge Quantity and sources .................................. 71 pipes ............................................. 96 Areal distribution of brine production ................... 89 B. Analyses reported in Roswell Geol. Soc. (1956) ..... ..... 97-98 QUALITY OF WATER ................................... 90 FIGURES Chemical 91 standards for water use ......................... 1. Areas in New Mexico described in ground-water reports of Chemical characteristics of ground water in southern New Mexico Institute of Mlining and Technology, State Lea County .......................................... 99 Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Division ....... : iv V Structure .............................................. 42 Brine contamination of shallow ground water ............... 102 Permian and Triassic unconformity ..................... 43 Movement of brine underground ........................ 103 Red-bed erosion surface ................................ 43 Reported instances of brine contamination ............... 104 .................................... Collapse structures 46 Chemical criteria for recognition of brine contamination ... 106 Origin of undrained depressions on the Llano Estacado. 47 Disposal of brine into deep wells ........................ 114 Geologic history ........................................ 48 SUMMARY .............................................. 117 GROUND WATER ...................................... 51 REFERENCES ........................................... 119 Principles of occurrence ................................. 52 .................................................. Effects of pumping .................................... 53 INDEX 121 Ground-water maps ................................... 54 Principal aquifers ....................................... 56 Illustrations Aquifers in rocks of Triassic age ........................ 56 Ogallala formation and Quaternary alluvium ............. 58 TABLES Use of ground water in southern Lea County ................ 61 I. Average annual temperature at stations in southern Lea Irrigation ............................................ 62 County, N. Mex., 1952-55 ................. ; 23 Gasoline plants ....................................... 63 2. Summary of industrial production in southern Lea Other industrial uses .................................. 65 County, N. Mex., 1952-55 .......... ..................... 25 Gas stripping plants ................................. 65 3. Stratigraphic units in southern Lea County, N. Alex ....... 30-31 Oil-well and shothole drilling ........................ 65 Carbon-black plants ................................. 67 4. Log of the Triassic section, Continental Oil Co. No. 2 Bell Lake unit SE¼4SW!/4 see. 30, T. 23 S., Oil-pool repressuring .................................. 67 R. 34 E ............. 34 Public supplies ....................................... 68 5. Ground-water use, southern Lea County, N. Mlex., 1954 .... 62 Eunice ............................................ 68 6. Records of wells in southern Lea County, N. Alex .......... 73-86 Jal ................................................ 69 Oil Center ......................................... 69 7. Records of selected wells in Texas adjacent to southern Monument ......................................... 69 Lea County, N. Alex .................................. 87 Malijamar .......................................... 70 8. Chemical analyses of water from wells in southern Stock ................................................ 70 Lea County, N. Alex ................................... 92-98 Rural domestic uses.
Recommended publications
  • ROGER Y. ANDERSON Department of Geology, the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 WALTER E
    ROGER Y. ANDERSON Department of Geology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 WALTER E. DEAN, JR. Department of Geology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New Yor\ 13210 DOUGLAS W. KIRKLAND Mobil Research and Development Corporation, Dallas, Texas 75221 HENRY I. SNIDER Department of Physical Sciences, Eastern Connecticut State College, Willimantic, Connecticut 06226 Permian Castile Varved Evaporite Sequence, West Texas and New Mexico ABSTRACT is a change from thinner undisturbed anhy- drite laminae to thicker anhydrite laminae that Laminations in the Upper Permian evaporite generally show a secondary or penecontem- sequence in the Delaware Basin appear in the poraneous nodular character, with about 1,000 preevaporite phase of the uppermost Bell to 3,000 units between major oscillations or Canyon Formation as alternations of siltstone nodular beds. These nodular zones are correla- and organic layers. The laminations then change tive throughout the area of study and underly character and composition upward to organi- halite when it is present. The halite layers cally laminated claystone, organically laminated alternate with anhydrite laminae, are generally calcite, the calcite-laminated anhydrite typical recrystallized, and have an average thickness of the Castile Formation, and finally to the of about 3 cm. The halite beds were once west anhydrite-laminated halite of the Castile and of their present occurrence in the basin but Salado. were dissolved, leaving beds of anhydrite Laminae are correlative for distances up to breccia. The onset and cessation of halite depo- 113 km (70.2 mi) and probably throughout sition in the basin was nearly synchronous. most of the basin. Each lamina is synchronous, The Anhydrite I and II Members thicken and each couplet of two laminated components gradually across the basin from west to east, is interpreted as representing an annual layer of whereas the Halite I, II, and III Members are sedimentation—a varve.
    [Show full text]
  • DIAGENESIS of the BELL CANYON and CHERRY CANYON FORMATIONS (GUADALUPIAN), COYANOSA FIELD AREA, PECOS COUNTY, TEXAS by Katherine
    Diagenesis of the Bell Canyon and Cherry Canyon Formations (Guadalupian), Coyanosa field area, Pecos County, Texas Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Kanschat, Katherine Ann Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 19:22:41 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/557840 DIAGENESIS OF THE BELL CANYON AND CHERRY CANYON FORMATIONS (GUADALUPIAN), COYANOSA FIELD AREA, PECOS COUNTY, TEXAS by Katherine Ann Kanschat A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 8 1 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable with­ out special permission, provided that accurate acknowledge­ ment of source is made. Requests for permission for ex­ tended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major de partment or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the inter­ ests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Caverns Studies
    SALT CAVERN STUDIES - REGIONAL MAP OF SALT THICKNESS IN THE MIDLAND BASIN FINAL CONTRACT REPORT Prepared by Susan Hovorka for U.S. Department of Energy under contract number DE-AF22-96BC14978 Bureau of Economic Geology Noel Tyler, Director The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78713-8924 February 1997 CONTENTS Executive Summmy ....................... ..... ...................................................................... ...................... 1 Introduction ..................................................... .. .............................................................................. 1 Purpose .......................................................................................... ..................................... ............. 2 Methods ........................................................................................ .. ........... ...................................... 2 Structural Setting and Depositional Environments ......................................................................... 6 Salt Thickness ............................................................................................................................... 11 Depth to Top of Salt ...................................................................................................................... 14 Distribution of Salt in the Seven Rivers, Queen, and Grayburg Formations ................................ 16 Areas of Salt Thinning .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2016 Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas Jon T. Ehrhart Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds Part of the Geology Commons, Hydrology Commons, and the Speleology Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Ehrhart, Jon T., "Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 66. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/66 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This thesis is available at SFA ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/66 Speleogenesis and Delineation of Megaporosity and Karst Geohazards Through Geologic Cave Mapping and LiDAR Analyses Associated with Infrastructure in Culberson County, Texas By Jon Ehrhart, B.S. Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Stephen F. Austin State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science STEPHEN F.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypogenic Speleogenesis Within Seven Rivers Evaporites: Coffee Ac Ve, Eddy County, New Mexico Kevin W
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Faculty Publications Department of Geology 4-2008 Hypogenic Speleogenesis within Seven Rivers Evaporites: Coffee aC ve, Eddy County, New Mexico Kevin W. Stafford College of Sciences and Mathematics, Department of Geology, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Lewis Land Alexander Klimchouk Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/geology Part of the Geology Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Stafford, Kevin W.; Land, Lewis; and Klimchouk, Alexander, "Hypogenic Speleogenesis within Seven Rivers Evaporites: Coffee Cave, Eddy County, New Mexico" (2008). Faculty Publications. Paper 10. http://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/geology/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Geology at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. K. W. Stafford, L. Land, and A. Klimchouk – Hypogenic speleogenesis within Seven Rivers Evaporites: Coffee Cave, Eddy County, New Mexico. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 70, no. 1, p. 47–61. HYPOGENIC SPELEOGENESIS WITHIN SEVEN RIVERS EVAPORITES: COFFEE CAVE, EDDY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO KEVIN W. STAFFORD1,2,LEWIS LAND2,3, AND ALEXANDER KLIMCHOUK3,4 Abstract: Coffee Cave, located in the lower Pecos region of southeastern New Mexico, illustrates processes of hypogenic speleogenesis in the middle Permian Seven Rivers Formation. Coffee Cave is a rectilinear gypsum maze cave with at least four stratigraphically-distinct horizons of development. Morphological features throughout the cave provide unequivocal evidence of hypogenic ascending speleogenesis in a confined aquifer system driven by mixed (forced and free) convection.
    [Show full text]
  • Salado Formation Followed
    GW -^SZ-i^ GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE YEAR(S): B. QUICK, Inc. 3340 Quail View Drive • Nashville, TN 37214 Phone: (615) 874-1077 • Fax: (615) 386-0110 Email: [email protected] November 12,2002 Mr Roger Anderson Environmental Bureau Chief New Mexico OCD 1220 S. ST. Francis Dr. 1 Santa Fe, NM 87507 Re: Class I Disposal Wells Dear Roger, I am still very interested in getting the disposal wells into salt caverns in Monument approved by OCD. It is my sincere belief that a Class I Disposal Well would be benefical to present and future industry in New Mexico. I suspect that one of my problems has been my distance from the property. I am hoping to find a local company or individuals who can be more on top of this project. In the past conditions have not justified the capital investment to permit, build and operate these wells and compete with surface disposal. Have there been any changes in OCD policy that might effect the permitting of these wells? If so, would you please send me any pretinent documents? Sincerely, Cc: Lori Wrotenbery i aoie or moments rage i uu Ctoraeferiz&MoiHi ©ff Bedded Satt fltoir Storage Caverns Case Stundy from the Midlamdl Basim Susan D. Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology The University of Texas at Austin AUG1 0R9 9 Environmental Bureau Introduction to the Problem °" Conservation D/ws/on About solution-mined caverns l^Btg*** Geolojy_ofsalt Purpose, scope, and methods of our study Previous work: geologic setting of the bedded salt in the Permian Basin J^rV^W^' " Stratigraphic Units and Type Logs s Midland Basin stratigraphy
    [Show full text]
  • Karst in Evaporites in Southeastern New Mexico*
    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Compliance Certification Application Reference 27 Bachman, G. 0., 1987. Karst in Evaporites in Southeast~m New Mexico, SAND86-7078, Albuquerque, NM, Sandia National Laboratories. Submitted in accordance with 40 CPR §194.13, Submission of Reference Materials. ~I SAND86-7078 Distribution Unlimited Release Category UC-70 Printed September 1987 Karst in Evaporites in Southeastern New Mexico* SAND--86-7078 DE88 001315 George 0. Bachman, Consultant 4008 Hannett Avenue NE Albuquerque, NM 87110 Abstract Permian evaporites in southeastern New Mexico include gypsum, anhydrite, and salt, which are subject to both blanket and local, selective dissolution. Dissolution has produced many hundreds of individual karst features including collapse sinks, karst valleys, blind valleys, karst plains, caves, and breccia pipes. Dissolution began within some formations during Permian time and has been intermittent but continual ever since. Karst features other than blanket deposits of breccia are not preserved from the early episodes of dissolution, but some karst features preserved today-such as breccia pipes-are remnants of karst activity that was active at least as early as mid-Pleistocene time. Rainfall was much more abundant during Late Pleistocene time, and many features visible today may have been formed then. The drainage history of the Pecos River is related to extensive karstification of the Pecos Valley during mid-Pleistocene time. Large-scale stream piracy and dissolution of - salt in the subsurface resulted in major shifts and excavations in the channel. In spite of intensive groundwater studies that have been carried out in the region, major problems in groundwater in near-surface evaporite karst remain to be solved.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral and Energy Resources of the BLM Roswell Resource Area, East-Central New Mexico
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral and Energy Resources of the BLM Roswell Resource Area, East-central New Mexico by Susan Bartsch-Winkleri, editor Open-File Report 92-0261 1992 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 Denver, Colorado iMail Stop 937 Federal Center P.O. Box 25046 Denver, Colorado 80225 MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE BLM ROSWELL RESOURCE AREA, EAST-CENTRAL NEW MEXICO Summary.......................................................................................... 1 Introduction.................................................................................... 1 Location and geography of study area...................................... 1 Purpose and methodology........................................................ 3 Acknowledgements......................................................................... 4 Geology of east-central New Mexico, by Susan Bartsch-Winkler, with a section on Intrusive and extrusive alkaline rocks of the Lincoln County porphyry belt by Theodore J. Armbrustmacher 4 General..................................................................................... 4 Structure................................................................................. 5 Uplifts........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of the Boundary Between the Castile and Salado
    Gharacteristicsofthe boundary between the Castile and SaladoFormations near the western edge of the Delaware Basin, southeasternNew Mexico by BethM. Madsenand 1mer B. Raup,U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS-939, Denver, C0 80225 Abstract 1050 posited in the DelawareBasin of southeast New Mexico and west Texasduring Late Per- Permian The contact between the Upper mian (Ochoan)time. In early investigations Castile and Salado Formations throughout and SaladoFormations were un- the Delaware Basin, southeastNew Mexico /-a(run,ouo the Castile differentiated, and the two formations were and west Texas,has been difficult to define EDDY / aou^r" because of facies chanqes from the basin called Castile by Richardson (1904).Cart- center to the western idge. Petrographic wright (1930)divided the sequenceinto the studies of core from a Phillips Petroleum i .,/ upper and lower parts of the Castileon the Company well, drilled in the westernDela- -r---| ,' . NEW MEXTCO basisof lithology and arealdistribution. Lang ware Basin, indicate that there are maior (1935) the name "Saladohalite" Perotf,um introduced mineralogical and textural differences be- ,/ rot company "n for the upper part of the sequence,and he and Salado Formations. / core hole'NM 3170'1 tween the Castile the term Castile for the lower part The Castile is primarilv laminated anhv- retained of the drite with calciteand dolomite.The Salado ( of the sequence.Lang placed the base DELAWARE BASIN Formation is also primarily anhydrite at the SaladoFormation at the base of potassium location of this corehole, but with abundant (polyhalite) mineralization. This proved to layers of magnesite.This magnesiteindi- be an unreliable marker becausethe zone of catesan increaseof magnesiumenrichment mineralization occupies different strati- in the basin brines, which later resulted in graphic positions in different areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissolution of Permian Salado Salt During Salado Time in the Wink Area, Winkler County, Texas Kenneth S
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/44 Dissolution of Permian Salado salt during Salado time in the Wink area, Winkler County, Texas Kenneth S. Johnson, 1993, pp. 211-218 in: Carlsbad Region (New Mexico and West Texas), Love, D. W.; Hawley, J. W.; Kues, B. S.; Austin, G. S.; Lucas, S. G.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 44th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 357 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1993 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks.
    [Show full text]
  • San Andres Formation
    StephenStephen C.C. Ruppel,Ruppel, SUBREGIONALSUBREGIONAL DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT OFOF RESERVOIRRESERVOIR POROSITYPOROSITY ATAT AA MAJORMAJOR PERMIANPERMIAN UNCONFORMITY:UNCONFORMITY: BureauBureau ofof EconomicEconomic Geology,Geology, SANSAN ANDRESANDRES FORMATION,FORMATION, WESTWEST TEXASTEXAS TheThe UniversityUniversity ofof Texas,Texas, Austin,Austin, TX,TX, 78713-892478713-8924 ABSTRACTABSTRACT Most porosity development in carbonate reservoirs can be attributed in part or in total to diagenesis. This is especially true in Permian reservoirs of the Permian Basin, nearly all of which are dolomitized. Linking this diagenesis and associated porosity to unconformities representing major falls in sea level, INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION STRATIGRAPHYSTRATIGRAPHY ANDAND FACIESFACIES however, is commonly problematic using typical reservoir data sets. New subsurface data from the San Andres Formation, a major oil-producing reservoir in Texas and New Mexico, coupled with relationships previously defined from SANSAN ANDRES-GRAYBURGANDRES-GRAYBURG STRATIGRAPHYSTRATIGRAPHY ANDAND FACIESFACIES CYCLECYCLE STRATIGRAPHYSTRATIGRAPHY ANDAND FACIESFACIES ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURE equivalent outcrops, illustrate both the style and expression of such porosity SANSAN ANDRESANDRES STRUCTURESTRUCTURE FUHRMAN-MASCHOFUHRMAN-MASCHO FIELDFIELD Fuhrman-MaschoFuhrman-Mascho FieldField Fuhrman-MaschoFuhrman-Mascho SanSan AndresAndres Field,Field, AndrewsAndrews County,County, TexasTexas development. MIDDLE PERMIAN SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY ty Northwest Southeast MIDDLE PERMIAN SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY i -1100 PSL A-43 PermianPermian BasinBasin Gamma ray (API) Neutron porosity (%) PSL A-47 Depth Although the San Andres is characterized by an upward-shallowing succession Oil FMU 12A FMU 211 FMU 607 FMU 605 FMU 705 FMU 806 (ft) WFMU 110 WFMU 109 aturation WFMU 124 GR N GR N GR N GR N High Western Central Western 0 100 30 20 1010 0 -10 s GR N GR N of outer- to inner-ramp carbonate lithofacies in most platform settings, pervious Relative Algerita Western Permeabil GR N GR N ft GDP ft ft ft ft freq.
    [Show full text]
  • Play Analysis and Digital Portfolio of Major Oil Reservoirs in the Permian Basin
    Play Analysis and Digital Portfolio of Major Oil Reservoirs in the Permian Basin: Application and Transfer of Advanced Geological and Engineering Technologies for Incremental Production Opportunities Final Report Reporting Period Start Date: January 14, 2002 Reporting Period End Date: May 13, 2004 Shirley P. Dutton, Eugene M. Kim, Ronald F. Broadhead, Caroline L. Breton, William D. Raatz, Stephen C. Ruppel, and Charles Kerans May 2004 Work Performed under DE-FC26-02NT15131 Prepared by Bureau of Economic Geology John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin University Station, P.O. Box X Austin, TX 78713-8924 and New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, NM 87801-4681 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability for responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. iii ABSTRACT The Permian Basin of west Texas and southeast New Mexico has produced >30 Bbbl (4.77 × 109 m3) of oil through 2000, most of it from 1,339 reservoirs having individual cumulative production >1 MMbbl (1.59 × 105 m3).
    [Show full text]