Embassy of France Introduces Eco-Friendly Transportation Alternative Engagements
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2008 IAAF World Outdoor Lists 14
H H updated as at 18 December 2008 Compiled by Ottavio Castellini Legenda IAAF Statistics & Documentation Senior Manager A altitude Other compiler h heat Carlos Fernández Canet (ESP) qf quarter-final sf semi-final f final Amendments will be gratefully received by r race Ottavio Castellini c competition (E-mail address : [email protected]) q qualification Tel. (+377) 93 10 88 72 = ex-aequo Fax (+377) 93 25 09 00 jo jump off U20 Under 20 Principality of Monaco, U23 Under 23 18 December 2008 ope open ext extra Inv Invitational Uni University Col Collegiate HS High School * = world record awaiting ratification Decathlon ( WR 9026 Roman Šebrle CZE Götzis, 27 May 2001 ) 20 Kilometres Race Walk ( WR 1:17:16 Vladimir Kanaykin RUS Saransk, 29 Sep 2007 ) Wind over 4 m/s 7947 Franck Logel FRA 08 Jan 1985 3 Arles 08 Jun 2008 1:18:15 Francisco Javier Fernández ESP 06 Mar 1977 1 Cheboksary 10 May 2008 ( 10.66/+8.9 - 7.54/+3.1 - 12.22 - 2.05 - 50.16 / 14.73/+2.1 - 43.11 - 4.95 - 49.46 - 4:36.73 ) 1:18:18 Sergey Bakulin RUS 13 Nov 1986 2 Adler 23 Feb 2008 7922 Julien Choffart FRA 05 Nov 1978 4 Arles 08 Jun 2008 1:18:21 Valeriy Borchin 2 Cheboksary 10 May 2008 ( 11.01/+5.3 - 7.37/+6.2 - 13.75 - 1.99 - 50.32 / 14.67/+3.2 - 43.08 - 4.65 - 59.71 - 4:36.83 ) 1:18:34 Eder Sánchez MEX 21 May 1986 3 Cheboksary 10 May 2008 7886 Claston Bernard JAM 22 Mar 1979 1 Baton Rouge, LA 11 Apr 2008 1:19:01 Valeriy Borchin 1 Beijing (National Stadium) 16 Aug 2008 ( 10.70/3.00 - 7.22/4.6 - 14.96 - 2.09 - 51.03 / 14.31/2.5 - 49.29 - 4.15 - 51.83 - 4:55.94 ) 1:19:04 -
World Rankings — Men's 50K Walk
World Rankings — Men’s 50K Walk 1947–1969 no rankings done 1970 1 ........Christoph Höhne (East Germany) 2 ..Venyamin Soldatenko (Soviet Union) 3 ... Burkhard Leuschke (East Germany) 4 ................ Peter Selzer (East Germany) 5 ................. Otto Bartsch (Soviet Union) 6 .........Yevgeniy Lyungin (Soviet Union) 7 ......Winfried Skotnicki (East Germany) 8 .............Herbert Meier (West Germany) 9 ...........Peter Schuster (West Germany) 10 ....Horst-Rüdiger Magnor (West Germany) 1971 1 ..Venyamin Soldatenko (Soviet Union) 2 ................ Peter Selzer (East Germany) 3 ........Christoph Höhne (East Germany) 4 ................. Otto Bartsch (Soviet Union) 5 ......Winfried Skotnicki (East Germany) 6 . Bernhard Nermerich (West Germany) 7 ...........Igor Della Rossa (Soviet Union) 8 .........Yevgeniy Lyungin (Soviet Union) 9 ......................Paul Nihill (Great Britain) 10 .................................Larry Young (US) 1972 1 ....Bernd Kannenberg (West Germany) 2 ..Venyamin Soldatenko (Soviet Union) 3 ...................................Larry Young (US) 4 ................. Otto Bartsch (Soviet Union) Yohann Diniz won 5 ................ Peter Selzer (East Germany) the ’17 Worlds 6 .......Gerhard Weidner (West Germany) 7 ........Christoph Höhne (East Germany) with history’s 8 .............................. Vittorio Visini (Italy) second-fastest 9 ...Karl-Heinz Stadtmüller (East Germany) time 10 ...............Gabriel Hernandez (Mexico) Note: multiple Russian walkers are in the process of having major results annulled, meaning -
Freedom on the Net 2014
FREEDOM ON THE NET 2014 France 2013 2014 Population: 63.9 million Internet Freedom Status Free Free Internet Penetration 2013: 82 percent Social Media/ICT Apps Blocked: No Obstacles to Access (0-25) 4 3 Political/Social Content Blocked: No Limits on Content (0-35) 4 4 Bloggers/ICT Users Arrested: No Violations of User Rights (0-40) 12 13 TOTAL* (0-100) 20 20 Press Freedom 2014 Status: Free * 0=most free, 100=least free Key Developments: May 2013 – May 2014 • Pressure on internet companies increased, with France responsible for 87 percent of all removal requests received by Twitter in the second half of 2013. Twitter was also ordered by a French court to help identify authors of racist and hateful tweets (see Limits on Content). • French users no longer face the threat of having their internet access suspended for repeated copyright violations, due to a change in the controversial HADOPI laws. Users now face reduced fines (seeViolations of User Rights). • In a victory for free speech, a French woman accused of defamation by the Ministry of the Interior was found not guilty by a court in May 2014. Amal Bentounsi had appeared in an online video in which she decried impunity for police brutality (see Violations of User Rights). • Concerns over electronic surveillance increased after the passage of legislation in December 2013 that extended surveillance powers of intelligences agencies while failing to require judicial approval for their activities (see Violations of User Rights). 300 www.freedomhouse.org FREEDOM France ON THE NET 2014 Introduction France has a highly developed telecommunications infrastructure and a history of innovation in information and communications technologies (ICTs).1 Starting in the 1970s, France began developing Teletex and Videotex technologies, leading to the introduction of the widely popular Videotex service Minitel in 1982, which was accessible through telephone lines. -
The State of the Internet in France
2020 TOME 3 2020 REPORT The state of the Internet in France French Republic - June 2020 2020 REPORT The state of the Internet in France TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL 06 CHAPTER 3 ACCELERATING Editorial by Sébastien Soriano, THE TRANSITION TO IPV6 40 President of Arcep 06 1. Phasing out IPv4: the indispensable transition to IPv6 40 NETWORKS DURING 2. Barometer of the transition HET COVID-19 CRISIS 08 to IPv6 in France 47 3. Creation of an IPv6 task force 54 PART 1 000012 gathering the Internet ecosystem ENSURING THE INTERNET FUNCTIONS PROPERLY PART 2 58 CHAPTER 1 ENSURING IMPROVING INTERNET INTERNET OPENNESS QUALITY MEASUREMENT 14 CHAPTER 4 1. Potential biases of quality of service GUARANTEEING measurement 15 NET NEUTRALITY 60 2. Implementing an API in customer 1. Net neutrality outside of France 60 boxes to characterise the user environment 15 2. Arcep’s involvement in European works 65 3. Towards more transparent and robust measurement 3. Developing Arcep’s toolkit 68 18 methodologies 4. Inventory of observed practices 70 4. Importance of choosing the right test servers 22 CHAPTER 5 5. Arcep’s monitoring of mobile DEVICES AND PLATFORMS, Internet quality 26 TWO STRUCTURAL LINKS IN THE INTERNET ACCESS CHAPTER 2 CHAIN 72 SUPERVISING DATA 1. Device neutrality: progress report 72 INTERCONNECTION 29 2. Structural digital platforms 74 1. How the Internet’s architecture has evolved over time 29 2. State of interconnection in France 33 PART 3 76 TACKLE THE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY’S ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGE CHAPTER 6 INTEGRATE DIGITAL TECH’S ENVIRONMENTAL FOOTPRINT INTO THE REGULATION 78 1. -
FR in 2019 Afnic Studies February 2020
.FR in 2019 Afnic Studies February 2020 .FR IN 2019 2/25 Contents Glossary ................................................................................... 3 1. Growth of .FR ..................................................................... 4 2. Market share in France ...................................................... 5 3. Activity of .FR ..................................................................... 8 4. Structure of .FR net balance ............................................. 11 5. .FR KPIs ............................................................................ 12 6. Concentration of .FR market ........................................... 16 7. Distribution of .FR in France ........................................... 19 8. Foreign registrants ........................................................... 20 9. DNSSEC ............................................................................ 21 10. .FR internationalized domain names .............................. 22 11. Multi-year registrations ................................................... 23 12. Outlooks in 2020 for .FR ................................................. 25 www.afnic.fr | [email protected] Twitter: @Afnic | Facebook: afnic.fr .FR IN 2019 3/25 Glossary TLD (TOP-LEVEL DOMAIN): the last segment or extension of a domain name; the part that follows after the “dot” symbol. Examples include .FR and .ORG. CCTLD (COUNTRY-CODE TOP-LEVEL DOMAIN): a TLD specific to a country or territory. France’s ccTLD is .FR, but other French ccTLDs exist such as .RE -
Date Submitted: June 1, 2011 1 the State of E-Legal Deposit in France: Looking Back at Five Ye
http://conference.ifla.org/ifla77 Date submitted: June 1, 2011 The state of e-legal deposit in France: looking back at five years of putting new legislation into practice and envisioning the future Peter Stirling and Gildas Illien (Main authors) Pascal Sanz and Sophie Sepetjan (Contributing authors, speakers at IFLA Conference) Bibliothèque nationale de France Paris, France Meeting: 193 — e-Legal deposit: from legislation to implementation; from ingest to access — Bibliography Section with IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Digital Strategies Programme (ICADS), Information Technology, National Libraries and Knowledge Management Abstract: The article describes the legal situation in France regarding the legal deposit of digital material, and shows how it has been implemented in practice at the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF). The focus is on web archiving, where the BnF has experience going back almost ten years, but other aspects of digital legal deposit are discussed, with possible future developments and challenges. Throughout comparisons are made with the situations in other countries. The legal deposit of online electronic publications is a relatively recent development, but it is one which takes its place in a long-established tradition of legal deposit legislation in France. This article will demonstrate that digital legal deposit is a natural continuation and evolution of the existing legal situation, while at the same time creating new challenges and demanding the re-examination of some received ideas regarding legal deposit. It seeks to present the legal situation in France and the way in which it is put into practice; while the responsibility for legal deposit is divided between several institutions, this article will concentrate particularly on the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF). -
Internet Resilience in France – 2015 Report
Internet Resilience in France 2015 Document produced by the ANSSI with the participation of the Afnic. Researched and written by: François Contat, Pierre Lorinquer, Florian Maury, Julie Rossi, Maxence Tury, Guillaume Valadon and Nicolas Vivet. The editorial team would like to thank the observatory members and the reviewers for enriching this report with their comments and remarks. Document formatted using LATEX. Figures produced with TikZ and PGFPlots. Please send any comments or remarks to the following address: [email protected] Table of contents Executive Summary 5 Presentation of the Observatory 7 Introduction 9 1 Resilience in Terms of the BGP Protocol 11 1.1 Introduction 11 1.2 Prefixes Hijacks 15 1.3 The Use of Route Objects 19 1.4 Declarations in the RPKI 22 2 Resilience in terms of the DNS protocol 25 2.1 Introduction 25 2.2 Dispersion of authoritative DNS servers 30 2.3 Implementing DNSSEC 34 2.4 Dispersion of inbound e-mail relays 36 3 Resilience in terms of the TLS protocol 43 3.1 Introduction 43 3.2 Session Negotiation 46 3.3 Robustness of Certificate Signatures 50 General Conclusion 53 Bibliography 55 Acronyms 59 Internet Resilience in France - 2015 3 Executive Summary Since 2011, the Internet Resilience Observatory in France has studied the technologies that are critical for the proper operation of the Internet in France. In order to understand the dependence of the French economy and society on those of other countries, the Observatory focuses on the French Internet, a subset of the Internet in France that does not take into account foreign players. -
FIND E-COMMERCE SUCCESS in FRANCE Hints, Tips and Local Knowledge for Reaching the French Consumer
FIND E-COMMERCE SUCCESS IN FRANCE Hints, tips and local knowledge for reaching the French consumer Why France? • Market Guide • Trends • Opportunities • Competition Regulation • Dos and Don’ts • Consumer Analysis Asendia is an international partnership between La Poste and Swiss Post. Table of Contents Introduction 3 Asendia 3 La Poste 3 The French Market 4 The Story So Far 4 Market Leader Online 5 Key Indicators 6 Why Enter the French Market? 6 Sectors 7 Market Share 7 Sales Share Per Product Category 8 Where Does Europe Fit? 9 Competition 9 A Fragmented Market 9 Categories of Players 11 Major Players 11 Trends 12 Cross-border Sales 12 M-commerce 12 Market Places 13 French Consumers 14 Dos and Don’ts 16 Prospects 16 Growing Product Categories 17 Mobile Internet 18 Regulations 18 Data Privacy 18 Consumer Protection 18 Certification 18 VAT 18 Asendia - Who we are 19 Sources 20 France: A great opportunity for European online retailers Introduction Europe’s e-commerce market is burgeoning, offering very exciting opportunities for online retailers across a variety of sectors. The French market is relatively easy to enter and be successful in. Logistics are less complex than entering other countries and distribution costs can be low. For these reasons, France is often the first country that European e-commerce retailers will enter when expanding cross border. There are many things to consider and planning is essential, because naturally the market is not exactly the same as in other European markets. Here at Asendia, we have been helping European companies successfully distribute their goods across France for years and have collated all the information we have acquired in this guide to help you profit from international sales. -
JBN-12 Internet, Minitel And
JBN-12 EUROPE/RUSSIA Jean Benoît Nadeau is a Fellow of the Institute studying “the resistance of the French to the trend ICWA of economic and cultural globalization.” LETTERS Internet, Minitel and the Advent of the Hot Air Balloon Since 1925 the Institute of PARIS, France February, 2000 Current World Affairs (the Crane- Rogers Foundation) has provided By Jean Benoît Nadeau long-term fellowships to enable outstanding young professionals My wife Julie and I spent Christmas of 1999 at the Marsaults, a family of to live outside the United States friends we had first visited on Easter (see JBN-9) at their home in the Loire val- and write about international ley. But since all good things have to end and our lives are full of sacrifice, we were expected to leave on Boxing Day* to drive across France to the Lorraine areas and issues. An exempt town of Sarreguemine, where the Busches were expecting us (see JBN-11). Un- operating foundation endowed by fortunately, this was the morning of the highly destructive windstorm that swept the late Charles R. Crane, the the entire country and left massive destruction everywhere. Our normal route Institute is also supported by would have been via the capital, but not even the trains were running and the contributions from like-minded Paris area was in havoc. As we tried to figure out the best way, the father, Jean- individuals and foundations. Marie Marsault, disappeared in his office for a couple minutes. He came back with three sheets of paper listing the shortest routes. It was a detailed driving plan, with highway numbers, kilometers and time of driving. -
2018 Wtch.Qxp Walks F&F
IAAF WORLD RACE WALKING TEAM CHAMPIONSHIPS FACTS & FIGURES IAAF Race Walking World Cup 1961-2016 . .1 Team Results 1961-2016 . .4 Most Appearances in Finals . .9 Doping Disqualifications . .10 Youngest & Oldest . .10 Placing Tables . .11 Country Index . .13 World All-Time Road Walk Lists . .53 Major Walk Records . .54 IAAF (Senior) World Championships Walks Medallists . .56 Olympic Games Walks Medallists . .57 TAICANG 2018 ★ RACE WALKING TEAM CHAMPS, PAST TOP3s 1 IAAF RACE WALKING TEAM CHAMPIONSHIPS 1961-2016 Past Titles – 1961-1975: Lugano Trophy; 1977-1987 & 1991: IAAF Race Walking World Cup; 1989 & 1997 onwards: IAAF World Race Walking Cup; 1993 & 1995: IAAF/Reebok World Race Walking Cup. From 2016: IAAF World Race Walking Team Championships 2 Men Women 3 Date Venue Countries Total Athletes 20K 50K u20 10K 5/10/20K 50K u20 10K 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (1) October 15/16, 1961 Lugano, SUI 4/10 24 12 12 - - - - 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (2) October 12/13, 1963 Varese, ITA 6/12 36 18 18 - - - - 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (3) October 9/10, 1965 Pescara, ITA 7/11 42 21 21 - - - - 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (4) October 15, 1967 Bad Saarow, GDR 8/14 48 24 24 - - - - 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (5) October 10/11, 1970 Eschborn, FRG 8/14 60 30 30 - - - - 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (6) October 12/13, 1973 Lugano, SUI 9/18 68 35 35 - - - - 1 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 (7) October 11/12, 1975 Le Grand Quevilly, FRA 9/14 109 36 35 - 38 - - 1 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 (8) September 24/25, 1977 Milton Keynes, GBR 15/19 119 48 48 - 23 - - 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (9) September 29/30, 1979 Eschborn, FRG 18/21 147 54 55 - 40 - - 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (10) October 3/4, 1981 Valencia, ESP 18/23 160 58 59 - 49 - - 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (11) September 24/25, 1983 Bergen, NOR 18/21 169 54 53 - 64 - - 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (12) September 28/29, 1985 St. -
Annual Report 2003 1Ère PARTIE
AUTORITÉ DE RÉGULATION DES TÉLÉCOMMUNICATIONS RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE Annual Report 2003 1ère PARTIE Article L. 36-14 of the Post and Telecommunications Code under the Telecommunications Act no. 96-659 dated 26 July 1996, provides that: "The telecommunications regulatory authority shall draw up and publish an annual report on the performance of its functions and application of the legislative and regulatory provisions for telecommunications before 30 June each year. This report shall be submitted to the government and the Parliament. It shall also be submitted to the CSSPPT (public service commission for posts and telecommunications). In the report, the tele- communications regulatory authority may suggest legislative or regulatory amendments which appear to be called for due to changes in the tele- communications sector and the development of competition". Pursuant to this provision, the French Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (ART) has prepared this annual report, which comprises five parts. The first part reports on the situation of the electronic communications market in 2003, giving the main indications for assessing market development and major trends since 1997. It also includes an international comparison showing France's position with respect to the other European Union countries. The second part is devoted to the new legal framework, with a status report on transposition of directives in the different member states. It also lists the priority issues for regulation. ART's powers are described in the third part, which explains the philosophy and methods used by the regulator. The fourth part analyses ART's activities in 2003, while the fifth part describes its resources. 32 ORGANISATION1ère PARTIE CHART Economic & Forecasting Division François LIONS Economic assessments François VARLOOT Assistant: Antoine MAUCORPS Forecasting Didier CHAUVEAU Coordination of economic analyses. -
Report on International Desk Research
Report prepared for Consultancy study on the Institutional Framework and Corporate Governance for the Administration of Internet Domain Names in Hong Kong Deliverable 3 (Part I): Report on international desk research Gov3 limited | 83 Victoria Street | London | SW1H OHW | UK | www.gov3.net CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 3 Part I: Cross-country Overview 1 Introduction 6 Background 6 From “best practice” to “international practices mapping” 8 Structure of the report 9 2. Governance and government 11 Governance versus Government in general 11 Governance versus Government in the ccTLD best practice debate 13 Government role in ccTLD management: desk research findings 17 3 Synthetic overview of desk research findings 22 Organisational structure 22 Policy priorities 24 Governance processes 24 Operational practices 28 Forward orientation 33 4 International practices mapping 35 Policy priorities, organisational type, and government control matrixes 35 Governance matrixes 39 Operational practices matrixes 41 5 Conclusive Considerations 48 Part II: Country Reports (see separate document) 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the report on the findings of the international desk research activity, during which we have used web-based research, and a trawl of relevant published academic and market research, to pull together an assessment of the current state of domain name registration in the agreed list of 13 selected countries: Australia, China, Finland, France, Germany, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Sweden, Taiwan, the UK and the US. The report is in two main parts: Part I, which synthesises our key findings across all the countries; and Part II, which examines each country in turn against a common analytical framework.