DOCSLIB.ORG

Settlement Covers 1/2/06 6:04 Pm Page 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Settlement Covers 1/2/06 6:04 Pm Page 1 Settlement Covers 1/2/06 6:04 pm Page 1 A New Settlement for London Minutes of Evidence Volume 2 Settlement Covers 1/2/06 6:04 pm Page i A New Settlement for London Minutes of Evidence Volume 2 February 2006 Settlement Covers 1/2/06 6:04 pm Page ii copyright Greater London Authority February 2006 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN for complete set of 3 volumes: 1 85261 821 3 ISBN for this volume: 1 85261 823 X This publication is printed on recycled paper Commission on London Governance Evidentiary Hearings Date List of Witnesses 8 Feb 2005 Tony Travers - Director Greater London Group, London School of Economics 15 Feb 2005 Local Empowerment Simon Jenkins - Evening Standard columnist Paul Wheeler - Director of the Political Skills Forum and formerly of IDEA Anna Randle - Head of Policy, The New Local Government Network Ian Parker, Head of Communications, The New Local Government Network 1 March 2005 Mayor Ken Livingstone 15 March 2005 Housing Neil Litherland, Director of Housing, London Borough of Camden Chris Buss, Director of Housing, Wandsworth Borough Council Berwyn Kinsey, Head of London Housing Federation Donald Hoodless, Group Chief Executive Circle 33 Martin Cheeseman, Director of Housing Services, London Borough of Brent Mike Davis, Director Housing at London Borough of Croydon 5 April 2005 Homelessness Mark Grant - Director of Services and Deputy Chief Executive, Broadway Rebecca Sycamore - Head Homeless Link's London team Martin Cheeseman - Director of Housing, Brent Kamal Faizi – Divisional Director, London Borough of Newham 12 April 2005 Business Irving Yass CB - Director of Policy, London First Jo Valentine, Chief Executive, London First Jeff Austin, Director, Tribal Consulting Geraint Williams, Strategy Manager for BT Education and Local Government 19 April 2005 Sir Sandy Bruce-Lockhart, Chair, Local Government Association John Ransford, Director of Education and Social Policy at the Local Government Association 10 May 2005 Michael Snyder Chairman of the Policy and Resources Committee at Corporation of London 24 May 2005 NHS and Provision of Health Services Carolyn Regan, Chief Executive, North East London Strategic Health Authority Stuart Bell, Chief Executive, South London & Maudsley NHS Trust Kathy Jones, Director of Service Development, London Ambulance Service Caroline Taylor, Chief Executive, Croydon Primary Care Trust 31 May 2005 Chief Executives of London Boroughs Mary Ney, Chief Executives’ London Committee, CE of LB Greenwich Leo Boland, Honorary Secretary of CELC and CE of LB Barnet Rob Leak, Member of CELC and CE of LB Enfield Bruce McDonald, Member of CELC and CE of LB Kingston 7 June 2005 Grass Roots Simon Wooley, Chair, Black Londoners Forum Matt Dykes Policy Officer of SERTUC Kate Monkhouse, Director, London Civic Forum Peter Eversden, Chair of the London Forum of Amenity and Civic Societies 14 June 2005 Parish Councils Michael Green, Policy and Parliamentary Affairs Manager Justin Griggs, Head of Development Tim Ricketts, Head of Legal Services Cllr James Lewis (Labour), Kippax and Methley Ward, Leeds City Council Cllr Isabella Fraser (Lib Dem), Campbell Park Parish Council, Milton Keynes Council and Chair MK Association of Urban Local Council Caroline Godfrey, Parish Liaison Manager, Milton Keynes Council Unitary Authority Cllr Thomas Fraser, Campbell Park Parish Council, Milton Keynes Council and Training Officer for County Association for Parish Councils 20 June 2005 Learning Skills Ros Dunn, Director, Strategy & Corporate Planning, London Development Agency, (LDA representative on LSC London North Council) Maxine Jones, Director, LDA's Skills and Employment division Jacqui Henderson, Regional Director London, LSC London Central Peter Pledger, Executive Director, London West John Wise, Former Executive Officer, Corporation of London 28 June 2005 Rt Hon Lord Heseltine 12 July 2005 New York City Rosemary Scanlon, Former Deputy State Comptroller for the City of New York Ester Fuchs, Special Advisor to Mayor Bloomberg. 19 July 2005 Waste Mike Nicholls, General Manager, West London Waste Authority Barbara Herridge, Chief Executive, Waste Watch Cllr Gerry Ryan, LB Croydon John Duffy, Mayor's Policy Director for Environment Dirk Hazell, Chief Executive, Environmental Services Association Nick Lester, Director, Transport, Environment and Planning Simon Read, Project Director, London Recycling Fund 22 July 2005 Sir Michael Lyons, strategic adviser to Government and a Professor of Public Policy at INLOGOV, Birmingham University. 6 September The Arts 2005 Sarah Weir, Executive Director, Arts Council England, London Karin Gartzke, Chief Executive, Richmond Theatre and Chief Executive of the New Wimbledon Theatre Cllr Denise Jones, Deputy Chair, Association of London Government Culture and Tourism Board 13 September Rt Hon Nick Raynsford MP, former Minister for Local Government and 2005 the Regions. 19 October 2005 Policing Police Commissioner, Sir Ian Blair Commander Jim Smith 20 October 2005 First Minister for Wales, Rt Hon Rhodri Morgan Principle Private Secretary, Lawrence Conway 8 February 2005 Commission on London Governance: First Hearing Members of the Commission held its first evidence gathering session on Local Empowerment and improved services for the capital by putting questions to Tony Travers, Director Greater London Group, London School of Economics. Present: London Assembly Association of London Government Bob Neill (Deputy Chair, chaired the Cllr Stephen Carr (substitute for Cllr session) Edward Lister) Brian Coleman Cllr Cameron Geddes Darren Johnson Cllr Steve Hitchins Murad Qureshi Cllr Clyde Loakes Graham Tope Cllr Simon Milton (substitute for Cllr Merrick Cockell) Transcript Bob Neill (Deputy Chair): The first evidentiary session. The first thing is to introduce Tony Travers. I suspect Tony (Travers) needs very little introduction as Director of the Greater London Group at the London School of Economics (LSE). I should declare an interest as a former product of LSE myself, as I think perhaps others in this room would be connected with this Authority. Tony (Travers) is acknowledged all round as one of the leading if not the leading academic experts on London. I have certainly found his published works very interesting and useful and of course he has been a great help to both the Greater London Authority (GLA) and the Association of London Government (ALG), often ready to provide us with evidence and advice. We are grateful for trespassing on your time again. As you know with these things, we like to keep it fairly fluid and try to have a bit of discussion going. There are a number of topics that we want to touch upon. What I think I would be grateful for is your indication to us to start with of what you see as the key areas that need looking at as far as London governance is concerned. Tony Travers (Director, Greater London Group, London School of Economics): Thank you to all members of the Commission for inviting me to this, the first evidentiary hearing of the Commission on London Governance. If I could just say in a historical context, given the number of distinguished enquiries that have addressed this issue – Ullswater (Royal Commission on London Government (Ullswater Commission) 1922), Herbert (Herbert Royal Commission 1960), Marshall (Marshall Report 1978) – over the last century, in a sense there is always a good time to have another review. The question of what works and what does not in London is a matter of permanent interest, partly because of the city’s vast geographical size, and partly because of its history – the way it evolved from small units of government up to being a big city and from time to time, units of city-wide government have been clamped upon it. The question of how the city is best governed is probably never going to be settled once and for all. If I can address the precise question you asked, Chair, I think if one takes the system as it has evolved over the nearly five years since the GLA Act came into effect, I think what we have seen is a system that has matured. Though there are doubtless calls – as there always will be with London government systems – for something to be abolished, broadly, the system has settled down. The questions within the present arrangements that still clearly remain to be addressed include the extent to which power is or is not over-concentrated within central government in relation to the powerful new unit of government that the GLA is or could more fully become. The second issue is of course the question of London’s – both the boroughs’ and the GLA’s – financial freedom. The third issue that still remains on the table is whether the arrangements that were initially set up for the GLA and its internal workings are the best they could possibly be. Certainly from my perspective, it seems first, the disposition of powers between central government and London including the boroughs; secondly, financial matters; and thirdly the question of how the GLA operates given that we are now five years into a new system. I think those are the three key issues I would highlight. Bob Neill (Deputy Chair): That is thoughtful, and perhaps if it convenient to members, we will try to take it in broadly those blocks as I think that fits in with some of the issues we ourselves have to think about. Let us kick off with the over-governance. If we were looking at that over-governance, how would you say it is characterised, and what are potentially the problems that you see arising from that? How might we look at it? Tony Travers (Director, Greater London Group, London School of Economics): I think the primary difficulty for this Commission and those represented on it, is that they are only two of the at least three levels of government that operate to a significant extent in London.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Covid-19: Joint Statement to the Chancellor of the Exchequer
    COVID-19: JOINT STATEMENT TO THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER Rt Hon RISHI SUNAK We write on behalf of Birmingham’s business community, including the Greater Birmingham Chambers of Commerce, Birmingham City Council, the Greater Birmingham & Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership, the Institute of Directors West Midlands, the Federation of Small Businesses, MPs, Lords, Trade Unions and Business Improvement Districts following the announcement yesterday that the City was to be subject to further enhanced restrictions. Birmingham now falls into the “High Level” category of restrictions (Tier 2) which amongst other things will prevent the mixing of households in social settings. This alone will have a devastating impact on an already fragile hospitality sector. We acknowledge and appreciate that Government is making incredibly difficult decisions in unprecedented times. But these are also difficult and unprecedented times for our employees, constituents and members, many of whom have had to live with the uncertainty that Covid-19 has brought over the spring and summer months which now seems likely to extend for the duration of the winter. Prior to Covid-19 Birmingham was booming with an economy second only to London in size at £31.9bn. Our tourism and hospitality sectors were worth £13bn employing close to 76,000 people. The Council and Greater Birmingham Chambers of Commerce wrote to you last week setting out the steps that the Government needed to take to help limit the impact of coronavirus on the City. These included:- (a) Taking an evidence-informed approach to the implementation of restrictions, so if a threshold is met (such as the rate of infection per 100,000) work is undertaken to fully understand the sources of infection in a geographic area to enable the tailoring of restrictions accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • G NEWS RELEASE
    • RON ENT g NEWS RELEASE 470 17 November 1987 DOMESTIC RATES TO BE ABOLISHED IN MOST AREAS OF ENGLAND IN 1990 The Government has decided to introduce the Community Charge in one go on 1 April 1990 in all local authorities in England, except for the highest spending areas in London, Environment Secretary Nicholas Ridley told the House of Commons today. In a small number ot areas where spending is highest, either as a result of the Inner London Education Authority, or the Borough, or both, the Community Charge will be phased in over four years between 1990-1994. For those high-spending areas every adult will pay a £100 Community Charge in 1990/1991 if spending is unchanged compared with the previous year. At the same time, households in those areas will pay a proportion of their rates. The proportion will decline steadily to zero over the following four years while the Community Charge will increase. For all other areas Community Charge will be introduced fully on 1 April 1990. As previously announced there will also be a safety net, phased out over four years to limit the effects of the move to the new grant and business rate systems on Community Chargepayers and ratepayers. It is now proposed, however, that there will be a maximum contribution to the safety net of £75 per adult in any area. In a written answer to a Parliamentary Question from Jeff Rooker MP (Perry Barr), Mr Ridley said: -1- 2 MARSHAM STREET• LONDON SW1P 3EB - TELEPHONE 01 • 212 3434 410 "The Government has given careful consideration to the arrangements for introducing the Community Charge in England in 1990/91, in the light of the many representations that have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics Water the Ethics of Efficiency
    £9 foodethics Water The ethics of efficiency PLUS Clive Bates enjoys a café in Khartoum Unpacking the Stuart Is our food too thirsty? problem: Jacob Downward, Maite Aldaya, Tony Allan, Mikel Ateka, Tompkins and Mike Acreman Wenonah Hauter, Tim Lang, Ramón Llamas, José Esteban and Stuart Orr Lyla Mehta, David Molden, Nick Reeves, Spring 2008 | Volume 3 Issue 1 | www.foodethicscouncil.org Spring 2008 | Volume Castro on the solutions Johan Rockström, Jeff Rooker, John Selborne Contents Food Ethics, the magazine of the Food Ethics Council, seeks The challenge to challenge accepted opinion and spark fruitful debate about 05 Are we exporting drought? key issues and developments in Jacob Tompkins food and farming. Distributed quarterly to subscribers, each issue features independent news, 07 Water ethics comment and analysis. José Esteban Castro says water policy should get political The Food Ethics Council challenges government, business and the public to tackle 10 The big question: is our food too thirsty? ethical issues in food and Maite Aldaya | Tony Allan | Mikel Ateka | Wenonah Hauter | Tim Lang | farming, providing research, Ramón Llamas | Lyla Mehta | David Molden | Nick Reeves | Johan Rockström | analysis and tools to help. The views of contributors to this Jeff Rooker | John Selborne magazine are not necessarily those of the Food Ethics Council or its members. Responding to water scarcity Please do not reproduce without permission. Articles are 15 Technology copyright of the authors and Stuart Downward images as credited. Unless otherwise
    [Show full text]
  • House of Lords Official Report
    Vol. 814 Tuesday No. 39 20 July 2021 PARLIAMENTARYDEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDEROFBUSINESS Introduction: Baroness Davidson of Lundin Links ...........................................................119 Questions Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents .................................119 Human Rights Due Diligence ........................................................................................123 Chinese Products and Companies: Human Rights Violations .......................................126 National Food Strategy Independent Review.................................................................130 Minimum Energy Performance of Buildings Bill [HL] First Reading...................................................................................................................133 Conduct Motion to Agree..............................................................................................................133 Medical Devices (Northern Ireland Protocol) Regulations 2021 Motion to Approve ..........................................................................................................142 Medical Devices (Coronavirus Test Device Approvals) (Amendment) Regulations 2021 Motion to Approve ..........................................................................................................142 Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Bill [HL] Report.............................................................................................................................154 Health
    [Show full text]
  • Secrets No. 7
    Newspaper of the Campaign for Freedom of Information 50p NUll All-party westrstminster tear to campaign fOlfor right of access to perso·sonal files An all-party team of three Peers and three Members of . "~~"'.,...,··""" .9>.$11 •i _ . _ .""""",~_.._ ,.. ,- Parliament are to spearhead a major campaign this Autumn "p to promote a Bill entitling individuals to have access to their own personal files. The Campaign for Freedom of Information believes the issue to be of such importance that it is comitting all of its resources to it for at least six months. The parliamentary team is: House of Lords Lord Hooson QC, former Liberal MP Emlyn Hooson Labour Lady (Jane) Ewart Biggs, Lord Hooson .0800 Steve Norris MP Lady (Gloria) Hooper, Conservative House of Commons Steve Norris, Conservative MP for Oxford East Chris Smith, Labour MP for Islington Sth and Finsbury, who attempted to introduce a similar but not identical measure in 1984 Archie Kirkwood, Liberal social servicesspokesman and MP for Roxburgh and Berwickshire The Campaign has published a special report on access to personal files entitled "I want to know what's in my file"; available from the campaign for £1.50, it incorporates the Bill. ~rkwood Meetings are being held at all party conferences to prom­ Archie Kirkwood MP MP Chris Smith MP Lady Hooper mote the Bill. It will be introduced under the 10 minute rule procedure on October 29 by Mr Kirkwood, who has the opportunity Campampaign's first legislativ to introduce a Bill on that day. It will then be printed and be the basis for a big drive to encourage any MP who comes high in the Autumn Ballot to take it I)lrther.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Full PDF
    Trim 1/2 in off the top of all covers Front edge of spine-----------8.875in from the front edge of the paper. Trim small here ----- Trim large here --- *Small covers trim to (14.625 x 9.4) *Large covers trim to (18.875 x 11.4) Let Them Eat Precaution Let Them Eat Precaution How Politics Is Undermining the Genetic Revolution in Agriculture Edited by Jon Entine The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network, 15200 NBN Way, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 17214. To order call toll free 1-800-462-6420 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries please contact the AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036 or call 1-800-862-5801. This publication, and the research and conference that led to it, were funded by the American Enterprise Institute’s National Research Initiative and by AEI’s Inez and William Mabie Endowment for Agricultural Policy Research. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Let them eat precaution: how politics is undermining the genetic revolu- tion in agriculture / edited by Jon Entine p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8447-4200-7 (cloth: alk. paper) 1. Plant biotechnology. 2. Plant biotechnology—Social aspects. 3. Transgenic plants. 4. Transgenic plants—Risk assessment. 5. Food supply. I. Entine, Jon. SB106.B56L48 2005 631.5'233—dc22 2005007449 11 10 09 08 07 06 1 2 3 4 5 6 © 2006 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Party Annual Report 2020 3 CONTENTS
    LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2 0 2 0 Labour Party Annual Report 2020 3 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION LABOUR PARTY MANAGEMENT . 45 Foreword from Keir Starmer . 5 Human Resources Report . 46 Introduction from Angela Rayner . 7 Introduction from the General Secretary . 8 2019/2020 National Executive Committee . 10 STABILITY IN OUR FINANCES . 49 NEC Committees . 13 Finances . 50 Obituaries . 14 Fundraising: NEC aims and objectives for 2020 . 15 fundraising and The Rose Network . 51 Events and Endorsements 2019/20: events, exhibitions, annual conference . 52 GENERAL ELECTION . 17 Donations, including sponsorship over £7 .5k . 55 2019 General Election . 18 Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2019 . 56 PARLIAMENTARY BY-ELECTIONS . 25 Statement of Registered Brecon and Radnorshire . 26 Treasurer’s responsibilities . 57 LOOKING AHEAD: 2021 ELECTIONS . 27 APPENDICES . 81 Local and Mayoral Elections 2021 . 28 Members of Shadow Cabinet The year ahead in Scotland . 30 and Opposition Frontbench . 82 The year ahead in Wales . 31 Parliamentary Labour Party . 86 Members of the Scottish Parliament. 92 MEMBERS AND SUPPORTERS . 33 Members of the Welsh Parliament . 93 Building an active membership Members of the London Assembly . 94 and supporters network . 34 Directly Elected Mayors . 95 Equalities: Winning with Women; Leaders of Labour Groups . 96 BAME Labour; LGBT+ Labour; Labour Peers . 104 Disability Labour; Young Labour . 35 Labour Police and Crime Commissioners . 103 Parliamentary Candidates endorsed by the NEC at time of publication . 107 POLICY MAKING . 39 NEC Disputes . 108 National Policy Forum . 40 NCC Cases . 109 INTERNATIONAL . 43 International work/ Westminster Foundation for Democracy . 44 Labour Party Annual Report 2020 3 Introduction FOREWORD KEIR STARMER It is the honour of my life to lead our great running the Organise to Win review, and a movement .
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Commission for Wales
    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT THE PRINCE RUPERT HOTEL, SHREWSBURY ON MONDAY 7 NOVEMBER 2016 DAY ONE Before: Ms Margaret Gilmore, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ______________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 0207 960 6089 ______________________________ Time noted: 10.00 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning, my Lords, ladies and gentlemen. I should say actually my Lords and gentlemen, I think we have probably got more Lords in the room than anybody else. Lovely to see you, and welcome to this public hearing on the Boundary Commission for England’s initial proposals for new parliamentary constituency boundaries in the West Midlands region. My name is Margaret Gilmore, I am an Assistant Commissioner of the Boundary Commission for England. I was appointed by the Commission to help them in their task of making recommendations for new constituencies in the West Midlands region. I am responsible for chairing the hearing today and tomorrow, and I am also responsible with a fellow Assistant Commissioner, David Latham, for analysing all the representations received about the initial proposals for this region, and then presenting recommendations to the Commission as to whether or not those initial proposals should be revised. I am assisted here today by members of the Commission staff, led by Gerald Tessier, who is sitting beside me here, and Gerald will shortly provide an explanation of the Commission’s initial proposals for new constituencies in this region. He will tell you how you can make written representations and will deal with one or two administrative matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Reform Lectures2.Pub
    The Reform Challenge Perspectives on Parliament: Past, present and future... Text and graphics © Hansard Society 2010 Published by the Hansard Society 40-43 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1JA Tel: 020 7348 1222 Fax: 020 7438 1229 Email: [email protected] All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, without the prior permission of the Hansard Society. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. The Hansard Society, as an independent, non-party organisation, is happy to invite analysis and discussion of these views. For more information about other Hansard Society publications visit our website at www.hansardsociety.org.uk Cover design by Matt Korris Cover image by Diana Stirbu Sub-editing by Virginia Gibbons Design and Layout by Matt Korris Contents Preface 1 Peter Riddell Chair, Hansard Society The Reform Challenge 3 Dr Ruth Fox Director, Parliament & Government Programme, Hansard Society Parliamentary reform: From here to there 15 Rt Hon John Bercow MP Speaker of the House of Commons Ermine, Ethics and Engagement - evolution in the House of Lords 23 Baroness Hayman Lord Speaker Parliamentary reform: the Labour perspective 31 Rt Hon Jack Straw MP Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor Parliamentary reform: the Liberal Democrat perspective 39 David Howarth MP Liberal Democrat Justice spokesperson Parliamentary reform: the Conservative perspective 47 Rt Hon Sir George Young MP Shadow Leader of the House of Commons Preface Peter Riddell Chair, Hansard Society This series of lectures came at the end of Audit of Political Engagement was the the most turbulent Parliament in living sharp decline in the number of people memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Developments in Northern Ireland Since March 2007
    ` Political Developments in Northern Ireland Since March 2007 Standard Note: SN/PC/04513 Last updated: 15 November 2007 Author: Azadeh Pak This note offers a summary of developments in Northern Ireland since March 2007. For an earlier chronology of events, please see Standard Note no 4245 Political Developments in Northern Ireland since June 2006. For greater detail on the St Andrews Agreement and the legislation which followed see Library Research Paper 06/56 The Northern Ireland (St Andrews Agreement) Bill 2006-7 and Library Research Paper 07/32 The Northern Ireland (St Andrews Agreement) (No 2) Bill 2006-07. Contents A. Background 2 B. Formation of the Northern Ireland Executive 2 1. Northern Ireland Assembly legislative programme 7 C. Recent Developments 8 1. Irish Language Act 10 2. Complaint against Mr Ian Paisley Junior 11 3. Donations to Political Parties in Northern Ireland 12 4. Parliamentary Boundary Commission for Northern Ireland 13 5. Review of Assembly Secretariat 13 D. Independent Monitoring Commission Reports 14 1. Independent Monitoring Commission 15th Report 14 2. Independent Monitoring Commission 16th Report 15 E. Inter-Governmental Relations 16 1. North South Co-operation (Implementation Bodies) (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 18 2. British/Irish Council 18 3. North South Ministerial Council 19 F. Reference material: 19 1. UCL Constitution Unit Devolution Monitoring Report 19 2. Policy Focus: Northern Ireland 20 Standard Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise others. A.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Party Annual Report 2017 Introduction
    FOR THE MANY NOT THE FEW LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2017 INTRODUCTION CONTENTS INTRODUCTION NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2017 05 Foreword from Jeremy Corbyn STABILITY IN OUR FINANCES 07 Introduction from Tom Watson 50 Stability and Progress within the Party 09 Introduction from the General Secretary 51 Fundraising and Thousand Club 10 2016/2017 National Executive 52 Events, Business Engagement and Committee Endorsements, Visits and Exhibitions 12 NEC Committees 54 Donations, including Sponsorship 13 Obituaries over £7,500 14 NEC Aims and Objectives for 2017 55 Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2016 PARLIAMENTARY BY-ELECTIONS 56 Treasurers’ Report 16 Batley and Spen 58 Administrative Information 17 Richmond Park 60 Statement of Registered Treasurers' 18 Sleaford and North Hykeham Responsibilities 19 Witney 61 Independent Auditor’s Report to the 20 Copeland Members of the Labour Party 21 Stoke-on-Trent Central 62 Consolidated Income and Expenditure Account for the Year Ended LOCAL ELECTIONS 2017 31 December 2016 24 Analysis 63 Statements of Comprehensive Income 26 City and Region Mayors and Changes in Equity for the Year Ended 28 Local Government Report 31 December 2016 64 Consolidated Balance Sheet at LOOKING AHEAD: 2018 ELECTIONS 31 December 2016 30 Local Elections 2018 65 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 31 Boundary Review for the Year Ended 31 December 2016 66 Notes to Financial Statements NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2017 MEMBERS AND SUPPORTERS APPENDICES 34 Renewing our Party and Building an Active 82 Parliamentary Labour Party Membership
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Unit Report on Fixed-Term Parliaments
    Fixed Term Parliaments Professor Robert Hazell The Constitution Unit, University College London August 2010 ISBN: 978-1-903903-59-9 Published by The Constitution Unit Department of Political Science UCL (University College London) 29-30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU Tel: 020 7679 4977 Fax: 020 7679 4978 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/ © The Constitution Unit, UCL 2010 This report is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First published August 2010 2 Foreword The new Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government has an ambitious and wide ranging agenda for political and constitutional reform. One of the main items, on which it is proceeding apace, is the proposal for fixed term parliaments. This featured in the Programme for Government, published on 20 May; with further detail given by the Deputy Prime Minister in a statement to the House of Commons on 5 July. On 22 July the government introduced its Fixed Term Parliaments Bill, just before the summer recess, and indicated that Second Reading should take place in mid September. The rapid pace has allowed almost no time for public consultation or debate. There has been no Green or White Paper. The bill has not been published in draft, with time allowed for pre-legislative scrutiny.
    [Show full text]