Atomic and Molecular Aspects of Astronomical Spectra Arxiv:1211.1236V1 [Physics.Atom-Ph] 3 Nov 2012

Atomic and Molecular Aspects of Astronomical Spectra

Taha Sochi

A dissertation submitted to the Department of Physics & Astronomy University College London in fulﬁlment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy arXiv:1211.1236v1 [physics.atom-ph] 3 Nov 2012

September 2012 Declaration

The work presented in this thesis is the result of my own eﬀort, except where otherwise stated. All sources are acknowledged by explicit reference.

Taha Sochi ......

1 Abstract

In the ﬁrst section of this thesis, we present the atomic part of our investigation. AC2+ atomic target was prepared and used to generate theoretical data required in the investigation of recombination lines that arise from collisions between electrons and ions in thin plasma found in planetary nebulae and other astrophysical objects. The R-matrix method of electron scattering theory was used to describe the C2+ plus electron system. Theoretical data concerning bound and autoionizing states were generated in the intermediate-coupling approximation by R-matrix and Autostructure codes and compared to experimental data. The comparison revealed very good agreement. These theoretical data were then used to generate dielectronic recombination data for C+ which include transition lines, oscillator strengths, radiative transition probabilities, as well as emissivity and dielectronic recombination coeﬃcients. The data were cast in the form of a line list, called SS1, containing 6187 optically-allowed transitions which include many C ii lines observed in astronomical spectra. The data were validated by comparison to C+ recombination data obtained from a number of sources in the literature. This line list was used to analyze the spectra from a number of astronomical objects, mainly planetary nebulae, and identify their electron temperature where the observational data were obtained from the literature. The electron temperature investigation was also extended to include free electron energy analysis which uses observational and theoretical data of FF and FB transitions to investigate the long-standing problem of discrepancy between the results of recombination and forbidden lines analysis and its possible connection to the electron distribution (Maxwellian or non-Maxwellian). In the course of this investigation two elaborate methods, one

2 for ﬁnding and analyzing resonances (K-matrix method) and the other for analyzing and identifying electron temperature from astronomical spectra (least squares minimization), were employed. A computer program for atomic transition analysis was also developed and used as the main tool for obtaining the line list and analyzing the observational spectra. In the second section of the thesis we present the results of our molecular investigation; the generation of a comprehensive, calculated line list of frequencies

+ + and transition probabilities for the singly deuterated isotopologue of H3 ,H2D . The line list, which is the most comprehensive one of its kind in existence, contains over 22 million rotational-vibrational transitions occurring between more than 33 thousand energy levels and covers frequencies up to 18500 cm−1. All energy levels with rotational quantum number, J, up to 20 are considered, making the line list useful for temperatures up to at least 3000 K. About 15% of these levels are fully assigned with approximate rotational and vibrational quantum numbers. The list is calculated using a previously proposed, highly accurate, ab initio model implemented in a high-accuracy computer code based on a two-stage discrete variable representation (DVR) approach. Various consistency checks were carried out to test and validate the results. All these checks conﬁrmed the accuracy of the list. A temperature-dependent partition function, valid over a more extended temperature range than those previously published, and cooling function are presented. Temperature-dependent synthetic spectra for the temperatures T = 100, 500, 1000 and 2000 K in the frequency range 0-10000 cm−1 were also generated and presented graphically.

3 Acknowledgements and Statements

I would like to thank my supervisors Professor Peter Storey and Professor Jonathan Tennyson for their kindness, guidance and advice. It is a great privi- lege and gratifying experience to work with them over several years and learn from their deep knowledge and vast expertise in atomic, molecular and astro physics. I also would like to thank the external examiner Professor Nigel Badnell from the University of Strathclyde, and the internal examiner Dr Sergey Yurchenko from the University College London for their constructive remarks and corrections and valuable recommendations for possible future work. Apart from RMATRX-I and Autostructure atomic codes and DVR3D molecular code which were used as the main computing tools, I also used RESMESH and another piece of code from Pete to calculate f-values from photoionization cross sections. The rest of tools and techniques belong to me. Anyway, I assume full responsibility for any error or failure. The emphasis in this thesis is on the practical aspects of my work in an attempt to provide a full and credible account of how this investigation was conducted and how the conclusions were reached. Bare minimum of theory will be given when necessary for motivation and background as the theory is readily available in the literature and mainly belongs to other contributors. Finally, I should acknowledge the encouragement and motivation which I re- ceived from family and friends while doing this PhD with special tribute to my wife.

4 The following articles are based on results and activities related directly to the research presented in this thesis:

• Taha Sochi. Emissivity: A program for atomic transition calculations. Com- munications in Computational Physics, 7(5):1118-1130, 2010.

+ • Taha Sochi; Jonathan Tennyson. A computed line list for the H2D molecular ion. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 405(4):2345-2350, 2010.

• Taha Sochi; Peter J. Storey. Dielectronic Recombination Lines of C+. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables (Accepted), 2012.

• Peter J. Storey; Taha Sochi. Electron Temperature of Planetary Nebulae from C ii Recombination Lines. Submitted, 2012.

5 Contents

Declaration ...... 1 Abstract ...... 2 Acknowledgements and Statements ...... 4 Contents ...... 6 List of Figures ...... 10 List of Tables ...... 13 Nomenclature ...... 18

Part I: Atomic Physics 24

1 Introduction 25 1.1 Recombination Processes ...... 25 1.1.1 Radiative Recombination ...... 26 1.1.2 Dielectronic Recombination ...... 27 1.2 Literature Review ...... 29 1.2.1 Theory of Recombination Lines ...... 29 1.2.2 Recombination Lines of Carbon ...... 33 1.3 Recombination versus Forbidden Lines Analysis ...... 38

2 Physics of Scattering and Recombination 41 2.0.1 Close Coupling Approximation ...... 42 2.0.2 R-matrix Method ...... 45 2.0.2.1 Inner and Outer Regions ...... 47 2.0.2.2 Matching of Solutions ...... 48 2.0.2.3 Bound States ...... 48 2.0.2.4 Resonances ...... 48 2.0.2.5 Oscillator Strengths ...... 49 2.0.2.6 Photoionization Cross Sections ...... 50 2.0.2.7 Relativistic Eﬀects ...... 50

6 2.0.3 RMATRX-I Code ...... 51

3 Dielectronic Recombination Lines of C ii 55 3.1 Theoretical Background ...... 56 3.2 Autoionizing and Bound States Calculations ...... 62 3.2.1 Methods for Investigating Resonances ...... 63 3.2.1.1 QB Method ...... 64 3.2.1.2 Time-Delay Method ...... 66 3.2.1.3 K-Matrix Method ...... 67 3.2.2 Preparing Target ...... 68 3.2.3 Developing and Implementing K-matrix Method ...... 69 3.2.4 Calculations ...... 72 3.3 f-Values Calculations ...... 75 3.3.1 f-Values for Free-Free Transitions ...... 76 3.3.2 f-Values for Free-Bound Transitions ...... 77 3.3.3 f-Values for Bound-Bound Transitions ...... 82 3.4 Recombination and Emissivity Calculations ...... 82 3.4.1 Practical Aspects ...... 83 3.5 Comparison to Previous Work ...... 84

4 Electron Temperature of Astronomical Objects 89 4.1 Method ...... 91 4.1.1 Least Squares Minimization ...... 95 4.2 Astronomical Objects ...... 98 4.2.1 NGC 7009 ...... 99 4.2.2 NGC 5315 ...... 105 4.2.3 NGC 7027 ...... 109 4.2.3.1 Baluteau et al ...... 109 4.2.3.2 Zhang et al ...... 110 4.2.4 IC 418 ...... 115 4.2.5 NGC 2867 ...... 120 4.2.6 DQ Herculis 1934 ...... 123 4.2.7 CPD - 56◦8032 ...... 126 4.2.8 He 2-113 ...... 129 4.3 Electron Distribution ...... 132 4.4 Epilogue ...... 136

7 Part II: Molecular Physics 140

+ 5 Computed Line List for H2D 141 5.1 Introduction ...... 141 5.1.1 Literature Review ...... 144 5.1.2 Line Lists ...... 146 5.2 Method ...... 147 5.3 Validation and Primary Results ...... 154 5.3.1 Comparison to Experimental and Theoretical Data . . . . . 154 5.3.2 Partition Function ...... 155 5.3.3 Cooling Function ...... 158 5.3.4 Synthetic Spectra ...... 161

6 Conclusions and Future Work 164 6.1 Conclusions ...... 164 6.2 Recommendations for Future Work ...... 167

Bibliography 169

A Using Lifetime Matrix to Investigate Single-Channel Resonances190

B Error Analysis 195 B.1 Observed Error ...... 196 B.2 Fixed Percentage Error ...... 197 B.3 Poisson Error ...... 197

C Emissivity Program Documentation 199 C.1 Theoretical background ...... 200 C.2 Input and Output Files ...... 202 C.2.1 ‘Input’ Data File ...... 202 C.2.2 ‘ResEmis’ Input Data File ...... 209 C.2.3 ‘ELEVEmis’ Input Data File ...... 210 C.2.4 ‘Transitions’ Output Data File ...... 211 C.3 Tests ...... 211

D Input Data for R-matrix and Autostructure 213 D.1 R-matrix Input Data ...... 213 D.1.1 STG1 ...... 213 D.1.2 STG2 ...... 214

8 D.1.3 STGJK ...... 215 D.1.4 STG3 ...... 216 D.1.5 STGF ...... 216 D.1.6 STGB ...... 217 D.1.7 STGBF ...... 217 D.1.8 STGBB ...... 217 D.1.9 STGQB ...... 217 D.2 Autostructure Input Data ...... 218 D.2.1 Polarizability ...... 218 D.2.2 Transition Probabilities ...... 218 D.2.3 f-values ...... 218

E Tables 220 Bound States ...... 222 Resonances ...... 227 FB f-values ...... 229 Sample of SS1 ...... 233

F Input Data for DVR3D Code 233 F.1 Input Files for Stage DVR3DRJZ ...... 233 F.2 Input Files for Stage ROTLEV3 ...... 234 F.3 Input Files for Stage DIPOLE ...... 235 F.4 Input Files for Stage SPECTRA ...... 235 F.5 Input Files for Spectra-BT2 ...... 235

9 List of Figures

2.1 Flow chart of the RMATRX-I suite...... 53

3.1 Schematic diagram of the low-lying autoionizing quartet and doublet states and their interaction in intermediate coupling scheme. . . . . 73 3.2 Examples of photoionization cross sections in mega barn (y-axis) of the indicated bound states near to the designated autoionizing states versus photon energy in Rydberg (x-axis)...... 80

4.1 Two prominent planetary nebulae, NGC 7027 and Cat’s eye . . . . 99 4.2 The ratio of theoretical emissivity to observational flux as a function of temperature for the selected C ii lines of NGC 7009 spectra of Fang and Liu [1]...... 100 4.3 Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 7009 with the inclusion of 2 line λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 102 4.4 Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 7009 with the exclusion of 2 line λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 102 4.5 Ratio of normalized observed flux to normalized theoretical emissivity (NFER) versus temperature on log-linear scales for the planetary nebula NGC 5315...... 105 4.6 Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 5315 with the inclusion of 2 line λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 107 4.7 Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 5315 with the exclusion of 2 line λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 107 4.8 Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 7027 of Baluteau et al [2]. 2 The temperature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown. . . 111

10 4.9 Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 7027 of Zhang et al [3] 2 with the inclusion of line λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 113 4.10 Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 7027 of Zhang et al [3] 2 with the exclusion of line λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 113 4.11 The ratio of theoretical emissivity to observational flux as a function of temperature for the selected C ii lines of IC 418 spectra of Sharpee et al [4]...... 115 4.12 Temperature dependence of χ2 for IC 418 with the inclusion of line 2 λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 117 4.13 Temperature dependence of χ2 for IC 418 with the exclusion of line 2 λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 118 4.14 Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 2867-1. The temperature 2 at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 121 4.15 Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 2867-2. The temperature 2 at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 122 4.16 Temperature dependence of χ2 for DQ Herculis 1934. The temper- 2 ature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 124 4.17 Temperature dependence of χ2 for CPD - 56◦8032. The temperature 2 at χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 127 4.18 Temperature dependence of χ2 for He 2-113. The temperature at 2 χmin and the confidence interval are shown...... 131 4.19 Electron distribution plot for NGC 7009 data of Fang and Liu [1], alongside Maxwell-Boltzmann, κ (= 5.0) and Druyvesteyn (with x = 2.0) distributions for T = 5700 K. The y-axis is in arbitrary units. . 137 4.20 Electron distribution plot for NGC 7027 data of Zhang et al [3], alongside Maxwell-Boltzmann, κ (= 5.0) and Druyvesteyn (with x = 2.0) distributions for T = 12300 K. The y-axis is in arbitrary units. 138 4.21 Electron distribution plot for IC 418 data of Sharpee et al [4], alongside Maxwell-Boltzmann, κ (= 5.0) and Druyvesteyn (with x = 2.0) distributions for T = 8200 K. The y-axis is in arbitrary units. . . . 138

11 4.22 Electron distribution plot for CPD - 56◦8032 data of De Marco et al [5], alongside Maxwell-Boltzmann, κ (= 5.0) and Druyvesteyn (with x = 2.0) distributions for T = 17300 K. The y-axis is in arbitrary units...... 139 4.23 Electron distribution plot for He 2-113 data of De Marco et al [5], alongside Maxwell-Boltzmann, κ (= 5.0) and Druyvesteyn (with x = 2.0) distributions for T = 16200 K. The y-axis is in arbitrary units. 139

5.1 Jacobi scattering coordinate system...... 150 + 5.2 The H2D partition functions of ST1 (upper curve) and Sidhu et al [6] (lower curve)...... 160 + + 5.3 A graph of per molecule emission of H2D (upper curve) and H3 (lower curve) as a function of temperature on a log-log scale. The + + H2D curve is obtained from ST1 while the H3 curve is obtained from a digitized image from Neale et al [7]...... 162 5.4 A graph of integrated absorption coeﬃcient in cm.molecule−1 (on y axis) as a function of wave number in cm−1 (on x axis) within the range 0 − 10000 cm−1 for T = 100, 500, 1000 and 2000 K...... 163

12 List of Tables

3.1 The seven orbitals used to construct the C2+ target and their Slater Type Orbital parameters. The bar marks the pseudo orbitals. . . . 70 3.2 Orbital scaling parameters (λ’s) for Autostructure input. The rows stand for the principal quantum number n, while the columns stand for the orbital angular momentum quantum number l...... 77 3.3 Autoionization probabilities in s−1 of four resonance states as obtained in the current work (SS) compared to those obtained by De Marco et al [5] (DSB)...... 86 3.4 A sample of radiative transition probabilities in s−1 as obtained from this work compared to corresponding values found in the literature. The prime indicates an excited 1s22s2p(3Po) core. The 1s2 core is suppressed from all configurations...... 87 3.5 Effective dielectronic recombination rate coefficients in cm3.s−1 of a number of transitions for the given 10-based logarithmic temperatures. The first row for each transition corresponds to Badnell [8], while the second row is obtained from the current work. The superscripts denotes powers of 10. The prime indicates an excited 1s22s2p(3Po) core. The 1s2 core is suppressed from all configurations. 88

4.1 The observational C ii transition lines of Fang and Liu [1] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to ﬁnd the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula NGC

7009. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux...... 101 4.2 The electron temperature in Kelvin of NGC 7009 from different atoms, ions and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BJ stands for Balmer Jump and PJ for Paschen Jump. CW refers to the current work. For reference [9] we followed the apparent labeling of the authors although the temperatures may have been derived from CEL lines...... 104

13 4.3 The observational C ii transition lines of Peimbert et al [10] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to ﬁnd the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary

nebula NGC 5315. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux. 106 4.4 The electron temperature in Kelvin of NGC 5315 from different atoms, ions and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BJ stands for Balmer Jump. CW refers to the current work. 108 4.5 The observational C ii transition lines of Baluteau et al [2] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula NGC

7027. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux...... 110 4.6 The electron temperature in Kelvin for NGC 7027 derived from different atoms, ions and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BJ stands for Balmer Jump and PJ for Paschen Jump. CW refers to the current work where the first value was obtained from Baluteau et al data while the other two are obtained from Zhang et al data...... 112 4.7 The observational C ii transition lines of Zhang et al [3] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula NGC

7027. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux...... 114 4.8 The observational C ii transition lines of Sharpee et al [4] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula IC

418. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux...... 116 4.9 The electron temperature in Kelvin of IC 418 from different atoms, ions and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BD stands for Balmer Discontinuity and RF for Radio Frequency. CW refers to the current work...... 119 4.10 The observational C ii transition lines of Garc´ıa-Rojas et al [11] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary

nebula NGC 2867. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux. The first I value belongs to knot 1 and the second to knot 2. . . . 120

14 4.11 The electron temperature in Kelvin of NGC 2867 from different species and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BD stands for Balmer Decrement and K1 and K2 for knot 1 and knot 2. CW refers to the current work where the first value is related to knot 1 and the second to knot 2...... 122 4.12 The observational C ii transition lines of Ferland et al [12] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in DQ Herculis 1934. The

given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux...... 125 4.13 The electron temperature in Kelvin of DQ Herculis 1934 from different species and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BC stands for Balmer Continuum. CW refers to the current work...... 125 4.14 The observational C ii transition lines of De Marco et al [5] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula CPD - 56◦8032. The given flux is the absolute value in units of erg.s−1.cm−2...... 127 4.15 The electron temperature in Kelvin of the stellar wind of the CPD - 56◦8032 Wolf-Rayet star from different species and transitions as obtained from the cited literature. CW refers to the current work. Also Davey [13] seems to support the value of 12800 K derived by Barlow and Storey [14]...... 128 4.16 The observational C ii transition lines of De Marco et al [5] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula He 2-113. The given flux is the absolute value in units of erg.s−1.cm−2. 129 4.17 The electron temperature in Kelvin of the stellar wind of the He 2-113 Wolf-Rayet star as obtained from the cited literature. CW refers to the current work...... 130 4.18 The 64 autoionizing states of C+ used in the current study with their energy in Ryd, departure coefficient, and autoionization probability in s−1. The 1s2 core is suppressed from all configurations...... 134

15 5.1 Sample of the ST1 levels file. The columns from left to right are for: index of level in file, J, symmetry, index of level in block, frequency −1 in cm , v1, v2, v3, J, Ka, Kc. We used -2 to mark unassigned quantum numbers...... 153 5.2 Sample of the ST1 transitions file. The first two columns are for the indices of the two levels in the levels file, while the third column is for the A coefficients in s−1...... 154 5.3 The main experimental data sources used to validate the ST1 list. Columns 2 and 3 give the number of data points and the frequency range of the experimental data respectively, while the last four columns represent the minimum, maximum, average, and standard deviation of discrepancies (i.e. observed minus calculated) in cm−1 between the ST1 and the experimental data sets...... 156 5.4 Comparison between measured (Asvany et al [15]) and calculated (ST1) frequencies and relative Einstein B coefficients for a number + of transition lines of H2D . These coefficients are normalized to the last line in the table. The absolute B coefficients, as obtained from the A coefficients of ST1 list using Equation 5.2, are also shown in column 5 as multiples of 1014 and in units of m.kg−1...... 156 5.5 Asvany [15] data for the second overtone and combination transitions + of H2D compared to the corresponding data as calculated from the ST1 list...... 157 + 5.6 Asvany [15] data for the transitions of the (1,0,0) band of H2D detected with an optical parametric oscillator systems compared to the corresponding data as calculated from the ST1 list...... 157 + 5.7 The partition function of H2D for a number of temperatures as obtained from Sidhu et al [6] and ST1 line lists...... 159

E.1 The available experimental data from NIST for the bound states + 2+ 1 e of C below the C S0 threshold alongside the theoretical results from R-matrix calculations...... 222 E.2 The available experimental data from NIST for the resonance states + 2+ 1 e of C above the C S0 threshold alongside the theoretical results as obtained by K-matrix and QB methods...... 227

16 E.3 Free-bound f-values for bound symmetry J π = 1/2o obtained by integrating photoionization cross sections from R-matrix calculations. The superscript denotes the power of 10 by which the number is to be multiplied...... 229 E.4 Free-bound f-values for bound symmetry J π = 3/2o obtained by integrating photoionization cross sections from R-matrix calculations. The superscript denotes the power of 10 by which the number is to be multiplied...... 230 E.5 Free-bound f-values for bound symmetry J π = 5/2o obtained by integrating photoionization cross sections from R-matrix calculations. The superscript denotes the power of 10 by which the number is to be multiplied...... 231 E.6 Sample of the SS1 line list where several lines have been observed astronomically. The first column is for experimental/theoretical energy identification for the upper and lower states respectively where 1 refers to experimental while 0 refers to theoretical. The other columns are for the atomic designation of the upper and lower states respectively, followed by the air wavelength in angstrom and effective dielectronic recombination rate coefficients in cm3.s−1 for the given logarithmic temperatures. The superscript denotes the power of 10 by which the number is to be multiplied. The 1s2 core is suppressed from all configurations...... 232

17 Nomenclature and Notation

α indicial parameter in spherical oscillator 2 −3 α ﬁne structure constant (= e /(~c 4πo) ' 7.2973525376 × 10 ) Γa autoionization transition probability (s−1) Γr radiative transition probability (s−1) r −1 Γul radiative transition probability from upper state u to lower state l (s ) δ eigenphase sum δ eigenphase background 0 δ eigenphase gradient of K-matrix with respect to energy (J−1)

∆E full width at half maximum for energy distribution (J)

∆r width of resonance (J) ∆E energy diﬀerence (J) energy of resonance (J)

i energy of colliding electron (J) −12 −1 o permittivity of vacuum (' 8.854187817 × 10 F.m ) ε emissivity of transition line (J.s−1.m−3) εnt normalized theoretical emissivity −1 −3 εul emissivity of transition line from state u to state l (J.s .m ) ζ eﬀective charge (C) η number of degrees of freedom θ function of colliding electron ϑ Coulomb function κ characteristic parameter of κ distribution λ wavelength (m)

λlab laboratory wavelength (m)

λv vacuum wavelength (m) Λ eigenvalue µ reduced mass (kg) ν frequency (s−1)

ξi exponent in Slater Type Orbital formulation

18 π parity 3 −1 %c recombination coefficient for capture process (m .s ) 3 −1 %f effective recombination coefficient (m .s ) σ photoionization cross section (m2) τ lifetime of state (s) −17 τo atomic time unit (= ~/Eh ' 2.418884326505 × 10 s) φ vector coupled function Φ function of bound-state type in close coupling expansion χ2 goodness-of-fit index χ spin and angle functions of colliding electron ψ function of N-electron target Ψ wavefunction of Schrödinger equation −1 ωe fundamental frequency in Morse and spherical oscillators (s )

−11 a0 Bohr radius (' 5.2917720859 × 10 m) A anti-symmetrization operator A inner region radius in R-matrix formulation (m) A Einstein A coefficient (s−1) A˚ angstrom b departure coefficient bu departure coefficient of state u B Einstein B coefficient (m.kg−1) B matrix in QB method c speed of light in vacuum (299792458 m.s−1) c coefficient in close coupling expansion

Ci coeﬃcient in Slater Type Orbital formulation

Cp contribution to polarizability D dipole operator

De dissociation energy in Morse oscillator (J) e elementary charge (' 1.602176487 × 10−19C) e− electron E energy (J) −18 Eh Hartree energy (' 4.35974394 × 10 J)

19 Ei energy point in K-matrix method (J)

E0 position of K-matrix pole on energy mesh (J)

Ep photon energy (J)

Er energy position of resonance (J)

Ex characteristic energy of Druyvesteyn distribution

Eκ characteristic energy of κ distribution f oscillator strength ful oscillator strength of transition from state u to state l F radial function F energy ﬂux (J.s−1.m−2) F vector of radial functions g parameter in K-matrix method (J) g statistical weight in coupling schemes (= 2J + 1 for IC) g nuclear spin degeneracy factor h Planck’s constant (' 6.6260693 × 10−34 J.s) ~ reduced Planck’s constant (= h/2π ' 1.0545717 × 10−34 J.s) H Hamiltonian of the whole system

Hbp Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian

Hnr non-relativistic Hamiltonian H relativistic correction Hamiltonian rc √ i imaginary unit ( −1) I de-reddened flux (J.s−1.m−2) I identity matrix Ino normalized observational flux J total angular momentum quantum number J rotational quantum number k Boltzmann’s constant (' 1.3806505 × 10−23 J.K−1) k the projection of J along the body-fixed z-axis K reactance matrix in R-matrix theory K single-element K-matrix

Ki scalar value of single-element K-matrix at energy Ei

Ko background contribution to K-matrix l orbital angular momentum quantum number

20 L total orbital angular momentum quantum number m mass (kg) −31 me mass of electron (' 9.10938215 × 10 kg) M lifetime matrix M single-element M-matrix

Mmax maximum value of single-element M-matrix n principal quantum number nf eﬀective quantum number N number density (m−3) −3 Ne number density of electrons (m ) −3 Ni number density of ions (m ) N S Saha population (m−3) O number of observations P number of ﬁtting parameters P partition function

Pnl(r) radial function in Slater Type Orbital formulation

Pi power of r in Slater Type Orbital formulation Q matrix in QB method R resonance matrix in R-matrix theory r radius (m) r radius vector r1 diatomic distance in triatomic coordinate system (m) r2 distance of third atom from the diatom center of mass (m) re equilibrium distance in Morse oscillator (m) S scattering matrix in R-matrix theory S single-element S-matrix S total spin angular momentum quantum number S line strength (J−1) t time (s) T temperature (K)

Te electron temperature (K) v vibrational quantum number −1 Vii0 multipole potentials (J.C )

21 w statistical weight in least squares procedure x characteristic parameter of Druyvesteyn distribution W cooling function (J.s−1)

Xn+ ion of effective positive charge n ∗ X(n−1)+ excited bound state of ion with effective positive charge n − 1 ∗∗ X(n−1)+ doubly-excited state with effective positive charge n − 1 yc calculated value yo observed value z residual charge Z atomic number ∇ del operator ∇2 Laplacian operator

Abbreviations [.]∗ complex conjugate of matrix 0 upper 00 lower au atomic unit BB Bound-Bound BJ Balmer Jump C Coulomb CCD Charge-Coupled Device CEL Collisionally-Excited Lines DR Dielectronic Recombination DVR Discrete Variable Representation eV electron-Volt F Faraday FB Free-Bound FF Free-Free FWHM Full Width at Half Maximum

(.)f ﬁnal GHz Gigahertz IC Intermediate Coupling IUE International Ultraviolet Explorer

22 (.)i initial J Joule K Kelvin kg kilogram kpc kiloparsec (' 3.1 × 1019 meters)

(.)l lower (.)L length form m meter

(.)max maximum

(.)min minimum NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology ORL Optical Recombination Lines PJ Paschen Jump PN(e) Planetary Nebula(e) RR Radiative Recombination Ryd Rydberg s second STO Slater Type Orbital THz Terahertz u atomic mass unit

(.)u upper

(.)ul upper to lower (.)V velocity form ∀ for all

Note: units, when relevant, are given in the SI system. Vectors and matrices are marked with boldface. Some symbols may rely on the context for unambiguous identiﬁcation. The physical constants are obtained from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [16].

23 Part I

Atomic Physics:

Dielectronic Recombination Lines of C ii and Their Application in Temperature Diagnosis of Astronomical Objects Chapter 1

Introduction

Many atomic processes can contribute to the production of carbon spectral lines. These processes include radiative and collisional excitation, and radiative and dielectronic recombination. The current study is concerned with some of the carbon lines produced by dielectronic recombination and subsequent radiative cascades. In the following we outline the recombination processes of primary interest to our investigation.

1.1 Recombination Processes

The low-density plasma of nebulae heated by energetic photons from their pro- genitors provides an ideal environment for many physical processes. These include radiative recombination, dielectronic recombination, three body recombination and charge transfer. Recombination is believed to play a vital role in the physical processes that occur in nebulae, and hence a deep understanding of its role is required for analyzing nebular spectroscopy and modeling nebular evolution. The principal electron-ion recombination processes which are responsible for the emission of recombination lines are Radiative Recombination (RR) and Dielectronic Recom-

25 1.1.1 Radiative Recombination 26 bination (DR). Recombination of an electron and ion may take place through a background continuum known as radiative recombination, or through a resonant recombination process involving doubly-excited states known as dielectronic recombination. The latter can lead either to autoionization, which is a radiationless transition to a lower state with the ejection of a free electron, or to stabilization by radiative decay of the core to a lower bound state, possibly the ground state, with a bound electron. The RR and DR processes are closely linked and the diﬀer- ence between them may therefore be described as artiﬁcial; quantum mechanically they are indistinguishable. Recombination is mainly due to dielectronic processes which are especially important at high temperatures when the autoionizing levels are energetically accessible to the free electrons [17–19]. In the following sections we give a brief account of these two important recombination processes.

1.1.1 Radiative Recombination

Radiative recombination (RR) is the time inverse of direct photoionization where a single electron is captured by an ion to a true bound state with the subsequent emission of photons. Symbolically, the RR process is given by

− ∗ Xn+ + e → X(n−1)+ + hν (1.1)

− ∗ where Xn+ is an ion of effective positive charge n, e is an electron, X(n−1)+ is an excited bound state of the recombined ion with effective positive charge (n−1), h is the Planck’s constant and ν is the frequency of radiation. The rate for RR rises as the free electron temperature falls and hence it tends to be the dominant recombination process at low temperatures. It is particularly significant in the cold ionized plasmas found, for instance, in some supernova remnants. Radiative recombination is also the only route to recombination for single electron systems, 1.1.2 Dielectronic Recombination 27 such as H and He+, because dielectronic recombination does not work on these systems [17–21].

1.1.2 Dielectronic Recombination

Dielectronic recombination (DR) is a two step process that involves the capture of a colliding continuum electron by an ion to form a doubly excited state. Symbolically, DR can be described by the relation

− ∗∗ ∗ Xn+ + e ↔ X(n−1)+ → X(n−1)+ + hν (1.2)

∗∗ where X(n−1)+ is a doubly-excited autoionizing state with effective positive charge (n−1). This can be followed either by autoionization to the continuum with probability Γa, or by stabilization through a radiative decay of the captured electron or an electron in the parent to a true bound state of the excited core ion with probability Γr. The latter, which is the dielectronic recombination process, is responsible for the production of many recombination lines. Depending on the autoionizing state, the probabilities of these competing processes can go in either direction, that is Γa > Γr or Γa < Γr. These excited autoionizing systems underly resonances in the photoionization cross sections. The resonance states are normally unstable and hence they decay primarily by autoionization rather than radiative decay. The resonance phenomenon is a highly important feature in atomic and molecular collisions as it plays a vital role in electron scattering with atoms, ions and molecules. The Auger effect is one of the early examples of the resonance effects that have been discovered and extensively investigated [20, 21].

Dielectronic recombination dominates at high temperatures as it requires suﬃ- ciently energetic electrons to excite the target, though it is still highly signiﬁcant at low temperatures by recombination through low-lying resonances near the ion- 1.1.2 Dielectronic Recombination 28 ization threshold, where at these temperatures the free electrons can enter only these states. As the temperature rises, higher autoionizing levels can be reached and the process becomes more complicated by the involvement of many autoionizing states. As the energy of the resulting system in dielectronic recombination is greater than the binding energy of the whole system, the state normally autoionizes spontaneously and hence it is usually described as an autoionizing state. Because the dielectronic recombination and autoionization occur rapidly, the population of the autoionizing state can be held at its local thermodynamic equilibrium level relative to the ion-free electron system [22].

DR is a fundamental atomic process that has many manifestations in astrophysics and fusion plasmas; these include planetary nebulae and laboratory laser- induced plasmas. More speciﬁcally, the recombination lines produced by this process can be used to determine elemental abundances and electron temperatures in planetary nebulae and to diagnose plasma conditions in laboratory. The process is also important for evaluating the energy balance and degree of ionization in hot and cold plasmas as it contributes to the determination of state population and ionization balance at various ranges of temperature and electronic number density. DR can occur through numerous transitional autoionizing states; possibly the whole Rydberg series [19, 23].

We may distinguish three types of dielectronic recombination mechanism with relevance at diﬀerent temperatures

1. High-temperature dielectronic recombination which occurs through Rydberg series of autoionizing states, and in which the radiative stabilization is via a decay within the ion core.

2. Low-temperature dielectronic recombination which operates via a few near- threshold resonances with radiative stabilization usually through decay of the 1.2 Literature Review 29

outer, captured electron. These resonances are usually within a few thousand wave numbers of threshold, so this process operates at thousands to tens of thousands of degrees Kelvin.

3. Fine structure dielectronic recombination which is due to Rydberg series resonances converging on the ﬁne structure levels of the ground term of the recombining ion, and is necessarily stabilized by outer electron decays. This process can operate at very low temperatures, down to tens or hundreds of Kelvin.

In the current work we are concerned only with low-temperature dielectronic recombination and the resulting spectral lines.

1.2 Literature Review

In this section we present a short literature review to highlight some important developments in the theory of recombination lines, followed by a brief account on the previous work on the carbon lines in the spectra of planetary nebulae and similar astronomical objects.

1.2.1 Theory of Recombination Lines

Recombination of electrons and ions during scattering processes, which commonly occurs in many gaseous and plasmic environments, is a fundamental atomic process that has a strong impact on many physical systems. Recombination lines produced by such a process can be used as a diagnostic tool to determine elemental abundances and electron temperatures in planetary nebulae. In the laboratory, these lines can be used to probe the conditions of laser induced plasmas and provide 1.2.1 Theory of Recombination Lines 30 information that is essential for plasma modeling and fusion conditions. Therefore, there is a huge amount of literature on all aspects of this important phenomenon. In this section we present a non-comprehensive overview on some developments in the theory of recombination lines. As dielectronic recombination is the principal recombination process in most systems of interest to us and is the only one that we considered in our recombination calculations, this overview will be dedicated to this process.

Dielectronic recombination was investigated by Massey and Bates [24, 25] in connection with the Earth’s atmosphere using intuitive non-rigorous arguments focusing on recombination in plasma at rather low electron temperatures with consideration of low-lying resonances just above the ionization threshold. Burgess [26] investigated dielectronic recombination in the solar corona and highlighted the importance of this process at high temperatures in low-density hot plasma making it a possible dominant recombination process at coronal temperature. Goldberg [27] pointed out to the signiﬁcance of dielectronic recombination at low temperatures in the context of analyzing the intensity of transition lines in the spectrum of planetary nebulae.

The general theory of electron-ion scattering was developed by Seaton [28] in a study to analyze resonance structures on the basis of quantum defect theory using the R-matrix formulation. In another study, Davies and Seaton [29] investigated optical radiation in the continuum caused by recombination of an electron with a positive ion using a radiation damping approach for bound states transitions, and hence generalized this theory to the case of an optical continuum. Their techniques are capable of solving the problem of overlapping resonances found in dielectronic recombination. The results obtained from this investigation contributed to the subsequent development of quantum mechanical treatment of DR.

Presnyakov and Urnov [30] examined the problem of positive ion excitation by 1.2.1 Theory of Recombination Lines 31 electron collision, which leads to resonance structures in the cross sections, using Green functions to describe the Coulomb field. Their investigation concluded that the dielectronic recombination processes can lead to significant alteration in the rate coefficients of collisionally-excited ions. Beigman and Chichkov [31] examined dielectronic recombination through the forbidden levels and found that this process essentially increases the rate of total recombination at low temperatures. They also observed that dielectronic recombination is significant for low-temperature highly- ionized thin plasma. The importance of dielectronic recombination in general at low temperatures, typical of planetary nebulae, for the low-lying autoionizing states was also established by Storey [32] and Nussbaumer and Storey (e.g. [33]).

Using quantum defect theory of Seaton [28] and radiation damping treatment of Davies and Seaton [29], Bell and Seaton [34] developed a theory for dielectronic recombination process to accommodate resonance overlapping and the interaction with the radiation field. In a subsequent study, Harmin [35] extended this theory to incorporate the effect of electric fields in the scattering matrix where the Rydberg series of autoionizing states have been analyzed within a unified Stark quantum- defect treatment.

In a succession of papers, mainly focused on the second-row elements of the periodic table, Nussbaumer and Storey (e.g. [36]) developed the theory of dielectronic recombination rate coefficient calculations which is widely used nowadays in the computational work and simulation of recombination processes. Their approach is based on the use of experimental data for autoionizing energy levels with the possibility of using theoretical data obtained from atomic scattering and structure codes, such as RMATRX-I and Autostructure, to fill the gaps in the experimental data. The current work follows this approach in computing dielectronic recombination rate coefficients of C+.

Badnell [37] developed a fast accurate method for computing the total dielec- 1.2.1 Theory of Recombination Lines 32 tronic recombination rate coeﬃcients for He-like ions using his previously-developed [38] frozen-core approximation, and applied this method to the highly charged ion Fe24+. He also made other contributions to the theory and application of dielectronic recombination which include calculating dielectronic recombination rate co- eﬃcients for several ions (e.g. [8, 39, 40]), assembly of a comprehensive dielectronic recombination database [19], and the development and maintenance of the Au- tostructure code and its theoretical foundations [41]. Autostructure was used by many researchers to compute theoretical data related to dielectronic recombination as well as other types of atomic structure and scattering processes. This includes the current study where Autostructure was used, alongside the R-matrix code, to generate theoretical dielectronic recombination data for the SS1 line list.

Using the isolated resonance approximation and the distorted wave theory, La- Gattuta et al [42] proposed a theoretical approach for calculating the effect of static electric fields on the target cross section in dielectronic recombination processes. In another theoretical study based on a multichannel quantum defect theory of the Stark effect, dielectronic recombination under the effect of electric fields was examined by Sakimoto [43] with the derivation of simple formulae for computing the cross sections in DR to account for the effect of externally-imposed electric fields. Nahar and Pradhan [44, 45] presented a unified recombination ab initio treatment which incorporates both radiative and dielectronic processes within the close coupling approximation of electron-ion scattering to enable the calculation of a single, total recombination rate coefficient that may be employed for a variety of astrophysical applications. 1.2.2 Recombination Lines of Carbon 33

1.2.2 Recombination Lines of Carbon

There is an extensive literature on the applications of recombination lines theory. However, in this section we only highlight some studies on the recombination lines of carbon relevant to the applications of PNe and similar astronomical objects with special interest in the C ii lines.

Leibowitz [46] investigated the energy level population of ions in planetary nebulae with particular emphasis on the contribution of radiative excitation. The results were then applied to the intensity ratios of C iv lines in several planetary nebulae under various excitation conditions. In another study [47], he investigated the polarization of C iv emission lines in the spectra of planetary nebulae. Inves- tigating the structure of the Orion Nebula and the surrounding neutral medium,

Balick et al [48] mapped the recombination line C 85α of carbon using high spatial resolution all over the nebula to determine the ionized carbon distribution and its relationship to the H ii region.

Nussbaumer and Storey [49] examined a number of recombination lines of carbon in the context of studying the effect of the solar radiation field on the ionization balance for the purpose of analyzing the transition region in the solar chromosphere- corona. In a subsequent study [50] they computed the effective dielectronic recombination coefficients for selected lines of ions of carbon and other elements. The effective recombination coefficients were then fitted, as a function of temperature, to a suitable empirical formula in a temperature range found in planetary nebulae and similar astrophysical objects. Boughton [51] investigated several carbon recombination lines observed in the direction of Orion Nebula to construct two-cloud models which can replicate the observed intensities of the carbon lines and the velocities of the emitting regions.

In a series of papers, Harrington et al [52] discussed the recombination processes 1.2.2 Recombination Lines of Carbon 34 in the context of investigating the carbon abundance in the low-excitation planetary nebula IC 418 using ultraviolet spectral observations. In another study, Harrington et al [9] investigated some recombination lines of carbon using in their analysis results obtained earlier by Storey. In another paper of the same series, Clavel et al [53] analyzed the C ii λ1335 A˚ dielectronic recombination multiplet observed in the spectra of the planetary nebula IC 418.

Clegg et al [54] investigated a bright nebular region in the low-excitation planetary nebula NGC 40 using optical and IUE spectra for the purpose of probing the physical conditions and determining elemental abundances. This investigation led to the identification and determination of relative intensity of several C ii recombination lines in NGC 40 and IC 418. Hayes and Nussbaumer [55] examined the effect of dielectronic recombination process on the emissivity of the C ii λ1335 A˚ multiplet observed in various astronomical objects including planetary nebulae, and compared this to the effect of collisional excitation.

Investigating the abundance of carbon in planetary nebulae, Kholtygin [56] calculated the intensities of recombination lines of C2+ ion and used the observed intensities of several lines belonging to a number of carbon ions to determine their abundances, as well as the total abundance of carbon, in 46 planetary nebulae. In a later study [57] he used the calculated and observed intensities of carbon recombination and intercombination lines to find the effect of small temperature and density fluctuations on the intensities in the spectra of planetary nebulae. Bogdanovich et al [58] calculated the relative intensities of a number of C ii recombination lines, and used the observed intensities of these lines to determine the abundances of C2+ ion in 12 nebulae.

Badnell [8] used the Autostructure code within an intermediate coupling scheme to compute configuration mixing effective dielectronic recombination rate coefficients for the recombined C+ ion at temperatures T = 103 − 6.3 × 104 K applicable 1.2.2 Recombination Lines of Carbon 35 to planetary nebulae, and the results were tabulated for the quartet-quartet lines and some doublet-doublet lines. He also compared the total rate coefficients for dielectronic recombination and radiative recombination where the former have been obtained within an LS as well as an intermediate coupling schemes. Péquignot et al [17] computed effective and total radiative recombination coefficients for selected optical and ultraviolet transitions of ions of carbon and other elements that produce most recombination lines observed in nebulae. The results were fitted to a four-parameter empirical expression which is valid over a wide range of electron temperature and at low electron number density.

In their investigation of the carbon abundance in planetary nebulae and the long-standing problem of discrepancy between recombination and forbidden lines results, Rola and Stasińska [59] examined the C ii λ4267 A˚ recombination multiplet and analyzed the observational data obtained from various sources for many planetary nebulae. Baluteau et al [2] examined several recombination lines of carbon in the course of studying the far-red spectrum of the bright and spectrum-rich NGC 7027 planetary nebula. Davey et al [60] presented effective recombination coefficients for C ii lines originating from transitions between doublet states in LS-coupling scheme using R-matrix code. Their results span a wide temperature range between 500-20000 K with an electron number density of 104 cm−3 relevant to planetary nebulae.

Investigating the chemical abundances of planetary nebulae, Liu et al [61] examined several optical recombination lines of carbon observed in a number of planetary nebulae. Peng et al [62] investigated theoretically the C ii recombination line λ8794 A,˚ which is important for determining carbon abundance in planetary nebulae, using the R-matrix method. In a similar study [23] they investigated dielectronic recombination processes of C2+ ion in planetary nebulae where several

C ii recombination lines were examined in the course of this study. Zhang et al 1.2.2 Recombination Lines of Carbon 36

[3] thoroughly examined the rich spectra of the planetary nebula NGC 7027. The extensive line list presented in this study comprises over 1100 transition lines from many atoms and ions of various elements and includes many recombination lines of carbon and its ions.

Extensive observational studies, similar to that of Zhang et al, are those of Liu et al [63] on the M 1-42 and M 2-36 planetary nebulae, Sharpee et al [4, 64] related to the planetary nebula IC 418, Peimbert et al [10] on NGC 5315, and Fang and Liu [1] on the bright planetary nebula NGC 7009. There are many other studies which are not as extensive as the previous ones but contain some observational spectral data from planetary nebulae and similar objects that include carbon recombination lines in general and C ii in particular. Examples of theses studies are: Flower [65], Barker [66], Aller and Keyes [67], Petitjean et al [68], Liu et al [61, 69–71], Esteban et al [72–76], De Marco et al [5], Garnett and Dinerstein [77], Bernard-Salas et al [78–81], Peimbert [82], Wesson et al [83–86], Tsamis et al [87–90], Ruiz et al [91], Garc´ıa-Rojas et al [11, 92–95], Ercolano et al [96], Stasi´nska et al [97], Robertson- Tessi and Garnett [98], Wang and Liu [99], Sharpee et al [100], and Williams et al [101]. Some of these studies are used as sources of observational data in our investigation, as will be examined later on in this thesis.

This review highlights the diversity of the work that has been done on the C ii recombination lines although this topic has not been comprehensively investigated as there are many gaps to be filled. From the perspective of atomic physics, the most comprehensive of these studies and most relevant to the current investigation are those of Badnell [8] who calculated configuration mixing effective dielectronic recombination coefficients for the recombined C+ ion at temperatures T = 103 − 6.3 × 104 K applicable to planetary nebulae, and Davey et al [60] who computed effective recombination coefficients for C ii transitions between doublet states for the temperature range 500-20000 K with an electron density of 104 cm−3 relevant 1.2.2 Recombination Lines of Carbon 37 to planetary nebulae. Badnell performed calculations in both LS and intermediate coupling schemes and over a wide temperature range, using the Autostructure code [41, 102, 103] which treats the autoionizing states as bound and the interaction with the continuum states by a perturbative approach. On the other hand, Davey et al performed their calculations using the R-matrix code [104] which utilizes a more comprehensive recombination theory based on a unified treatment of bound and continuum states but worked in the LS-coupling scheme and hence their results were limited to doublet states.

The aim of the current study is to build on these investigations and elaborate on them by using the R-matrix code with an intermediate coupling scheme. However, our investigation will be limited to the dielectronic recombination concentrating our attention on the low-lying autoionizing states. On the observational perspective, most of the previous studies have focused on a few recombination lines employing the traditional method of using intensity ratio to analyze the physical conditions, especially electron temperature and number density, of the line-emitting regions. The current study tries to broaden some of these aspects ﬁrst by using any reliable data, and second by adopting a more comprehensive method of analysis, namely the least squares optimization, which is a collective method that can involve several transitions simultaneously to analyze the physical conditions. However, we do not use ﬁrst-hand observational data and therefore we rely on data reported in the refereed literature. Moreover, we will focus our attention on electron temperature diagnosis of the line-emitting regions. 1.3 Recombination versus Forbidden Lines Analysis 38

1.3 Recombination versus Forbidden Lines Anal-

ysis

In this section we brieﬂy discuss the long-standing dilemma in the physics of nebulae demonstrated by the discrepancy between recombination and forbidden lines results and the implication of this on our investigation. Resolving this puzzle is extremely important not only for understanding the nebular conditions but also for identifying possible ﬂaws in the underlying physical models. The collisionally-excited lines (CEL), also generally known in this context as forbidden lines, are produced by collision between energetic electrons and atoms and ions with a subsequent excitation and decay, while the optical recombination lines (ORL) are produced when electrons combine with ions by one of the aforementioned recombination mechanisms. These lines are detected either in emission or absorption modes. Both CELs and ORLs can in principle provide information about the physical and chemical conditions of the emitting and absorbing regions such as temperature, number density, pressure, elemental abundance, chemical composition and so on. Until recently, the main means used in the planetary nebula investigation is the CELs. One reason is the relative ease of observing and analyzing these lines as they are more abundant and intense than the ORLs. However, the ORLs are also used in the elemental abundance determination studies by using their relative intensities to the hydrogen lines [22, 88, 89, 105].

Although the forbidden lines are much stronger than the recombination lines, they are highly dependent on temperature and density structure and hence can lead to large systematic errors when used for instance in ionic abundance estimation. On the other hand, the faint recombination lines can be easily contaminated by radiation from other excitation processes such as fluorescence. Despite all these differences, there is a common feature between the results obtained from these lines; 1.3 Recombination versus Forbidden Lines Analysis 39 that is for all the atomic species investigated so far (mainly from the second row of the periodic table such as C, N, O and Ne) the forbidden lines in planetary nebulae normally produce lower ionic abundances than the corresponding values obtained from the recombination lines. The ratio of the ORLs to the CELs abundances is case dependent and can vary by a factor of 30 or even more. This has cast doubt on the validity of the previously accepted CELs analysis results. The systematic nature of this problem rules out the possibility of recombination line contamina- tion by resonance fluorescence or the inaccuracies in recombination coefficients as possible reasons as may have been suggested. This problem may be correlated to the dichotomy between the temperature obtained from the Balmer jump of H i recombination lines and that from the collisionally-excited forbidden lines where the latter is systematically higher than the former [57, 106, 107]. In fact, obtaining higher electron temperatures from forbidden lines than those deduced from recombination lines is a general trend in nebular studies.

Several explanations have been proposed to justify these discrepancies individually or collectively, though no one seems to be satisfactory or universally accepted. One explanation is the sensitivity of the collisionally-excited lines to temperature and structure fluctuations (e.g. exponential temperature dependency of the emissivity of these lines) which amplifies the errors that are intrinsically associated with these parameters. However, this reason alone cannot explain why the forbidden lines always produce lower abundance values. Another explanation is that the large temperature and density fluctuations within the nebular structure result in systematic underestimation of the heavy element abundances from the forbidden lines. The existence of knots depleted of hydrogen with high heavy element contents within the nebular gas has been proposed as a possible reason for these fluctuations and subsequent implications. The temperature inside these knots of high metallicity, and hence high opacity to stellar ultraviolet emissions and large 1.3 Recombination versus Forbidden Lines Analysis 40 cooling rates, is expected to be too low for efficient production of forbidden lines though it is still sufficiently high for the emission of recombination lines. Con- sequently, the recombination and collisional lines originate in different regions of the nebular gas with different elemental abundances and different temperatures. However, the existence and composition of these knots and their effect on the selectivity of emission lines is unsettled issue and a matter of debate. Moreover, in some cases the discrepancy between the collisional and recombination abundances is too large to explain by temperature fluctuation alone although it may be partially responsible [61, 69, 87, 108].

In a recent paper by Nicholls et al [109] it is claimed that this long-standing problem in planetary nebulae and H ii regions could arise from the departure of the electron energy distribution from the presumed Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium condition, and hence it can be solved by assuming a κ-distribution for the electron energy following a method used in the solar data analysis. One possible criticism to this approach is that the large discrepancy obtained in some cases may not be explicable by this adjustment to the electron distribution. Electron distribution will be the subject of a fairly thorough investigation in section 4.3 where we used lines originating from resonance states (that is FF and FB transitions) to obtain a direct sampling of the electron energy distribution based on the observational de-reddened ﬂux with theoretically-obtained parameters such as the departure coeﬃcients of the involved autoionizing states and the radiative probabilities of these transitions.

Amid the uncertainties highlighted by the CELs versus ORLs puzzle, it is extremely important to do more research especially on the recombination lines theory to have a breakthrough in this long-standing problem. We hope that our research on carbon recombination lines will be a valuable contribution in this direction. Chapter 2

Physics of Scattering and Recombination

In this chapter we give a brief theoretical background about the physics of scattering and recombination which forms the basis for our computational model. Our scattering quantum system comprises an N-electron atomic or ionic target plus a colliding electron where the particles are assumed to interact through electromagnetic forces only. The quest then is to solve the following time independent Schr¨odingerequation with suitable boundary conditions

HΨ = EΨ (2.1) where H is the Hamiltonian of the whole system (nucleus plus N + 1 electrons), Ψ is the quantum wavefunction, and E is the total energy of the system. In the case of light atoms and ions, the relativistic eﬀects can be ignored and hence H in atomic units is given by

N+1 N+1 ! X 1 2 Z X 1 H = − ∇n − + (2.2) 2 rn rnm n=1 m>n

41 2.0.1 Close Coupling Approximation 42

2 In this equation, ∇ is the Laplacian operator, Z is the nuclear atomic number, rn

th is the distance between the nucleus and the n electron, and rnm = |rn − rm| is the distance between the nth and mth electrons. The assumption here is that the nucleus is a massive motionless point charge compared to the surrounding electrons. The ﬁrst term of Equation 2.2 represents the total kinetic energy of the electrons, the second term is the total potential energy due to the attractive Coulomb forces between the nucleus and each electron, and the last one is the total potential energy due to the Coulomb repulsive forces between each pair of electrons. The ﬁrst two are called the one-electron terms while the third is called the two-electron term [104].

There are several ways for solving this system, one of which is to employ the close coupling technique which provides a powerful framework for performing scattering computations involving collisions between an electron and an N-electron target. The method can be used to analyze such quantum systems and obtain valuable information such as wavefunctions, energy of states, photoionization cross sections, oscillator strengths, and so on. In the following we outline this method and its realization based on the R-matrix theory.

2.0.1 Close Coupling Approximation

In the close coupling approach, the wavefunction is expanded in the following form

X Ψ = A ψiθi (2.3) i where A is an anti-symmetrization operator accounting for the exchange eﬀects between the colliding electron and target electrons, ψi are functions representing 2.0.1 Close Coupling Approximation 43

the target, and θi are functions of the free electron given by

1 θ = χ F (2.4) i i r i

In the last equation, χi are the spin and angle functions and Fi are the radial functions of the scattered electron. The target functions are usually computed by employing the configuration interaction theory with the use of identical set of radial functions. The radial functions can be either spectroscopic physical orbitals of the kind employed in a central filed approach, or pseudo orbitals used to represent electron correlation effects and improve accuracy. On introducing functions φi, which are vector-coupled products of ψi and χi, and imposing an orthogonality condition, the close coupling expansion of Equation 2.3 becomes

I J X 1 X Ψ = A φi Fi + cjΦj (2.5) r i=1 j=1

where cj are coeﬃcients in this expansion and Φj are functions of bound-state type for the entire system [104, 110–112].

Because Equation 2.5 is a truncated expansion, as it consists of a ﬁnite number of terms, Ψ is not an exact solution of the Schr¨odingerequation given by Equation 2.1. The following variational condition can be used to derive the close coupling equations

(δΨ | H − E | Ψ) = 0 (2.6) where δΨ is a variation in the wavefunction Ψ due to variations in the radial functions Fi and the close coupling expansion coefficients cj. This results in a system of integro-differential equations that should be satisfied by Fi and cj [110, 111]. 2.0.1 Close Coupling Approximation 44

The total energy of the whole system, E, in a certain state is given by

E = Ei + Ee− (2.7)

where Ei is the energy of the target in state i and Ee− is the energy of the colliding electron. When the total energy results in a bound state for the whole system, the electron energy Ee− is negative and the radial functions Fi exponentially decay to zero as r tends to inﬁnity. However, for some i’s the collision states result in

Ee− > 0. Channel i is described as closed when Ee− < 0 and open when Ee− > 0.

If Ei’s are ordered increasingly: E1 < E2 < ... < EI , then for a given total energy E there are Io open channels such that [112]

Ee− > 0 for i = 1 to Io

Ee− < 0 for i = (Io + 1) to I (2.8) where I is the total number of channels. A second subscript on the radial functions is normally used, when some channels are open, to denote boundary conditions.

The numerical calculations start by computing real functions Fii0 subject to certain boundary conditions on the reactance matrix

0 0 Fii0 (r) ∼ si(r)δ(i, i ) + ci(r)K(i, i ) for i = 1 to Io r→∞

Fii0 (r) ∼ 0 for i = (Io + 1) to I (2.9) r→0

In the last equation, si(r) and ci(r) are the components of the Coulomb functions

± 0 ϑ having an asymptotic form, and i = 1 ...Io. These functions are deﬁned by

ϑ±(r) = c ± is (2.10) 2.0.2 R-matrix Method 45 where c and s represent cosine and sine functions respectively, and i is the imaginary unit. The S-matrix functions also have asymptotic forms given by

− 1 − 0 + 0 F 0 (r) ∼ {ϑ (r)δ(i, i ) − ϑ (r)S(i, i )} for i = 1 to I ii 2 i i o − Fii0 (r) ∼ 0 for i = (Io + 1) to I (2.11)

It can be shown that the scattering matrix, S, is related to the reactance matrix, K, through the following relation

I + iK S = (2.12) I − iK where I is the identity matrix and i is the imaginary unit. Moreover, the S-matrix functions, F−, are related to the reactance matrix by

−iF− F− = (2.13) I − iK

It should be remarked that the complex conjugate of the S-matrix functions, F+, are used in the computation of photoionization cross sections [104, 110–112].

2.0.2 R-matrix Method

One way of solving the Schrödingerequation of the electron-atom system in the close coupling approximation is the R-matrix method which is a computational technique based on the theory developed originally by Burke and Seaton to provide a suitable framework for analyzing scattering processes. The R-matrix method is a computationally efficient way for solving the resulting close coupling equations. Its main feature is the partitioning of the space into two disjoint regions: inner and outer. These two regions are separated by a sphere centered at the system’s center of mass. The computational connection between these regions is established 2.0.2 R-matrix Method 46 through the R-matrix which links them at the boundary. The main task then is to find solutions for the inner region [111].

The R-matrix method starts by selecting a value A for the sphere radius r such that the functions φi and Φj are small outside the inner region. The focus of the method then is to find solutions in this region. A many-body Schrödinger equation should be solved when the incident electron is inside the inner region, while a solution of only a two-body equation is required in the outer region. This reduces the effort by restricting the mathematical and computational complexities to a small region of space. A complete discrete set of basis functions is used to express the wavefunction of the system in the scattering process. Initially, solutions that fulfill certain conditions on the boundary between the two regions are sought.

Such solutions, Ψ = ψn, which contain radial functions Fi(r) = fin(r), do exist for a discrete set of energies E = en. A number of options are available for the

0 boundary conditions. One choice is that fin(A) = 0 where the prime indicates a derivative with respect to r. In this process, the functions ψn are normalized to

0 (ψn|ψn0 )I = δ(n, n ) (2.14)

with the evaluation of the matrix elements (...)I in the inner region. For a given energy E, the wavefunction ΨE with radial functions FiE(r) can be expressed as

X ΨE = ψnAnE (2.15) n where AnE is given by

−1 X 0 AnE = (en − E) fin(A)FiE(A) (2.16) i

0 In the last equation, FiE(A) is chosen such that ΨE meets predeﬁned boundary 2.0.2.1 Inner and Outer Regions 47 and normalization conditions. On substituting 2.16 into 2.15 with some algebraic manipulation, the following relation can be obtained

X 0 FiE(A) = Rii0 (E)Fi0E(A) (2.17) i0 where

X −1 Rii0 (E) = fin(A)(en − E) fi0n(A) (2.18) n is the R-matrix.

The target functions, ψn, are computed using expansions of the radial functions fin(r) with the inclusion of orthogonality conditions to obtain good convergence. The expansion coeﬃcients are acquired from diagonalizing the Hamiltonian matrix with a truncation process. The Buttle correction is then employed to compensate for the truncation [104, 110–112].

2.0.2.1 Inner and Outer Regions

As indicated earlier, the inner region, which may also be called the R-matrix box, is identified as the region inside a sphere of radius A centered on the center of mass of the entire system and essentially contains all the target electrons, while the outer region is the rest of the configuration space. The essence of the R-matrix method is to find solutions in the inner region where the system is considered a many- body problem. In the outer region, where electron correlation and exchange effects are less important and hence can be ignored, the system is treated as a two-body problem between the atomic target and incident electron, and the solution can then be acquired from an asymptotic expansion or by a perturbative treatment. In this region, the integro-differential equations are relegated to the following ordinary 2.0.2.2 Matching of Solutions 48 differential equations

2 d li(li + 1) 2z X − + + F + V 0 F 0 = 0 (2.19) dr2 r2 r i i ii i i0 where z is the ion’s residual charge, i is the energy of the free electron, and Vii0 are multi-pole potentials [104, 110–112].

2.0.2.2 Matching of Solutions

The solutions in the inner and outer regions of the R-matrix should be matched at the boundary between these regions r = A. Depending on the nature of the available channels (some open or all closed), several matrices are deﬁned and used to obtain and match the solutions. In this stage of the R-matrix calculations, the reactance matrix K is evaluated. This matrix, which symbolizes the asymptotic nature of the whole wavefunction, is real and symmetric and carries information from both regions [104, 112].

2.0.2.3 Bound States

Once the calculations of the inner-region of R-matrix are carried out and the essential R-matrix data fin(A) and en are obtained, as outlined already, speedy computations can be performed with minimum computational cost to ﬁnd the energy and wavefunction of the bound states [110].

2.0.2.4 Resonances

On obtaining the reactance matrix K and the scattering matrix S which is given by Equation 2.12, resonances can be obtained following one of several approaches; some of which are outlined in § 3.2.1. An advantage of using the close coupling 2.0.2.5 Oscillator Strengths 49 method is that resonance eﬀects are naturally delineated, since the interaction between closed and open channels is already incorporated in the scattering treatment.

2.0.2.5 Oscillator Strengths

The dipole operators in length and velocity form, DL and DV respectively, are given by

L X V X D = rn D = − ∇n (2.20) n n where r is the radius vector, ∇ is the del operator, and n is an index running over all electrons. Once these dipole operators are obtained, the line strength for a dipole transition between state a and state b can be computed in the following length and velocity forms

L L 2 Sba = |(b k D k a)|

V −2 V 2 Sba = 4(Eb − Ea) |(b k D k a)| (2.21)

where Ea and Eb are the energies of these states in Ryd. The oscillator strength, fba, which is a dimensionless quantity, can then be obtained [112]

(Eb − Ea)Sba fba = (2.22) 3ga

where ga is the statistical weight of the initial state given by ga = (2Sa +1)(2La +1) for LS-coupling and ga = (2Ja + 1) for intermediate coupling. The oscillator strength fba can be in length or velocity form depending on the form of the line strength Sba. When exact functions are utilized in the equations, the two forms are equal, i.e. SL = SV and f L = f V . The use of approximate functions would normally lead to diﬀerences between the two forms; the size of which may give a hint of the accomplished accuracy. However, agreement between the two forms 2.0.2.6 Photoionization Cross Sections 50 does not aﬃrm accuracy as they can agree coincidentally [104, 112].

2.0.2.6 Photoionization Cross Sections

For a transition from an initial bound state to a free ﬁnal state a generalized line strength S, similar to that of Equation 2.21, can be introduced. The photoionization cross section is then given by

4π2a2αE S σ = 0 p (2.23) 3g

where a0 is Bohr radius, α is the ﬁne structure constant, Ep is the photon energy in Ryd, and g is the degeneracy of the bound state. Again, in this formulation either the length or the velocity operator can be used [104, 112].

2.0.2.7 Relativistic Eﬀects

To account for relativistic eﬀects, the previously-outlined non-relativistic treatment of the R-matrix method can be adjusted by adding terms from the relativistic

Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian, Hbp, given by

Hbp = Hnr + Hrc (2.24)

where Hnr is the non-relativistic Hamiltonian and Hrc is the relativistic correction terms which include the one body mass, Darwin and spin-orbit terms; the two body fine structure terms; and the two body non-fine structure terms. This is normally achieved by first computing the Hamiltonian matrices in LS-coupling followed by the application of a unitary transformation to convert to intermediate coupling. In the RMATRX-I code only some of these relativistic terms (i.e. mass correction, one body Darwin, and spin-orbit terms) are overtly held [104]. 2.0.3 RMATRX-I Code 51

2.0.3 RMATRX-I Code

The R-matrix theory for atomic scattering is implemented in a computer code called RMATRX-I, which is a general-purpose program for analyzing atomic processes such as collision of free electrons with atoms and ions, radiative processes like transitions between bound states, polarizabilities, and photoionization cross sections. The R-matrix calculations can be performed in LS-coupling as well as in intermediate coupling, where the latter can be achieved through the inclusion of the one body correction terms from the Breit-Pauli relativistic Hamiltonian, as outlined earlier. The program consists of sequentially-coupled stages and is used in this study as the main tool for generating theoretical data for scattering, recombination and subsequent atomic processes. These stages fall into two major categories: inner region and outer region. The inner region code is composed of the following stages [104, 112, 113]

• STG1 to compute the bound and continuum orbital basis and the associated radial integrals. The target’s radial functions should be provided as an input to this stage where they have been obtained from atomic structure codes such as Autostructure and CIV3, as will be discussed later.

• STG2 to calculate angular algebra. This stage reads radial integrals produced by STG1 and evaluates the Hamiltonian and dipole operator matrices. It can also diagonalize the Hamiltonian matrix of the target if required.

• STGJK which is an optional stage that runs between STG2 and STG3 to recouple the Hamiltonian in the case of intermediate coupling scheme by trans-

forming the Hamiltonian matrix from LS-coupling to pair-coupling through the use of a unitary transformation to include Breit-Pauli relativistic eﬀects.

• STG3 to diagonalize the Hamiltonian matrix in the continuum basis and 2.0.3 RMATRX-I Code 52

produce vital R-matrix data required for the outer region stages.

The outer region code consists of the following stages

• STGB to calculate wavefunctions and energy levels for bound states and produce a data set required for radiative calculations of bound-bound and bound-free transitions.

• STGF to calculate wavefunctions of free states. It can also compute collision strengths for inelastic collisions and produce data needed for radiative calculations of free-free and bound-free transitions.

• STGBB to calculate oscillator strengths for bound-bound transitions.

• STGBF to calculate photoionization cross sections for bound-free transitions.

An extra stage called STGQB for ﬁnding and analyzing resonances was added to the R-matrix code by Quigley and co-workers [114].

In Figure 2.1 a flow chart of the RMATRX-I suite and its companions is presented. RMATRX-I needs input data to define the atomic target. This can be provided either by CIV3 code of Hibbert [115], or by Superstructure code of Eissner et al [102], or by Autostructure code. The latter is a modified version of Superstruc- ture that incorporates extensions and modifications such as those of Nussbaumer and Storey [103] and Badnell [41].

CIV3 is a general multi-configuration atomic structure code that calculates configuration interaction wavefunctions in LS and intermediate coupling schemes. The wavefunctions can then be used for further computations related to atomic processes such as finding oscillator strengths. CIV3 uses Slater Type Orbital (STO) formulation to specify the configuration interaction functions. The Slater Type 2.0.3 RMATRX-I Code 53

Autostructure OR CIV3: Prepare target

stg1: Evaluate radial integrals

stg2: Evaluate angular algebra

IC? No Yes stgjk: Recouple Hamiltonians

Stg3: Diagonalise Hamiltonian

Stgb: Energy levels Stgqb: Resonances Stgf: Collision strengths

Stgbb: Oscillator strengths Stgbf: Photoionisation cross-sections

Figure 2.1: Flow chart of the RMATRX-I suite.

Orbitals are deﬁned by

X Pi −ξir Pnl(r) = Cir e (2.25) i where Pnl(r) is a radial function for the nl orbital, Ci is a coeﬃcient and Pi and

ξi are indicial parameters in this formulation, r is the radius, and i is a counting index that runs over the orbitals of interest.

Superstructure and Autostructure [41, 102, 103, 112] are automatic general- purpose atomic structure codes based on the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac formulation. They compute atomic radial functions using central potentials of the form

ζ(r) V (r) = − (2.26) r where ζ(r) is a radius-dependent effective charge. The programs produce large quantities of diverse atomic structure and transition data particularly useful for as- 2.0.3 RMATRX-I Code 54 tronomical applications. Minimum specification of the atomic system, the type of the requested data and the required degree of approximation is needed as an input to Superstructure and Autostructure. Among their many applications, they can be used to calculate the target functions for the R-matrix code and configuration mixing autoionization rates in LS or intermediate couplings, where Breit-Pauli terms are used to account for relativistic corrections. Superstructure and Autostructure can also be used to calculate term energies, atomic and ionic energy levels, term- coupling coefficients, cascade coefficients, atomic transition data such as forbidden and permitted radiative transition probabilities, and so on. The programs employ multi-configuration type for wavefunction expansions.

In our investigation of the C ii recombination lines, we used target data generated by CIV3 for the scattering calculations as an input to STG1 of the R-matrix code, as presented in Table 3.1 and § D.1.1, while we used Autostructure to elaborate and investigate related issues. Autostructure was also used to find the oscillator strengths for the free-free transitions between resonance states since the available RMATRX-I code does not contain a free-free stage. In this approach the free-free transitions were treated as bound-bound transitions. Autostructure was also used for generating f-values for free-bound and bound-bound transitions involving the 8 topmost bound states, namely the 1s2 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo and 4Do levels, as these quartets with their large effective quantum number for the outer electron are out of range of the R-matrix code validity. The Autostructure input data files for these calculations are given in § D.2 in AppendixD. Chapter 3

Dielectronic Recombination Lines of C ii

Carbon recombination lines are an important diagnostic tool that can provide valuable information on the physical conditions in various astrophysical environments such as planetary nebulae and the interstellar medium. Because the recombination rate depends on the electron temperature Te and number density Ne, the variation of the carbon line intensities can be used in principle to determine the temperature and density in the line-emitting regions [116].

With regard to the recombination lines of C ii, there are many theoretical and observational studies mainly within astronomical contexts. Examples are [2,3,8, 9, 17, 23, 46–51, 53–55, 57–62, 117, 118]. The aim of the current study is to treat the near-threshold resonances and subsequent radiative decays using the uniﬁed approach of the R-matrix method in intermediate coupling.

In this study we investigate the recombination lines of C ii, that is the emission lines produced by the following recombination process

C2+ + e− → C+ (3.1)

55 3.1 Theoretical Background 56 and the subsequent radiative cascade decay which persists until the atom reaches the ground or a metastable state. Our investigation includes all the autoionizing resonance states above the threshold of C2+ 1s2 2s2 1Se with a principal quantum number n < 5 for the captured electron as an upper limit. This condition was adopted mainly due to computational limitations. In total, 61 autoionizing states (27 doublets and 34 quartets) with this condition have been theoretically found by the R-matrix method. Of these 61 resonances, 55 are experimentally observed according to the NIST database [16]. More details will follow in the forthcoming sections.

The major work in this investigation can be split into three main parts

1. Autoionizing and bound states calculations to generate the required theoretical data for the resonances and bound states.

2. Calculation of oscillator strength, f-values, for various transitions.

3. Recombination and emissivity calculations and analysis to ﬁnd the emissivity of various transition lines and compare the theoretical emissivity model to the observational data.

In the next section we provide a general theoretical background which will be followed by three sections in which we outline the theory and procedures that were followed in this investigation.

3.1 Theoretical Background

In a thermodynamic environment, an excited atomic state is populated by recombination and radiative cascade from higher states, and depopulated by autoionization 3.1 Theoretical Background 57 and radiative decay to lower states. Many recombination lines originate from dielectronic recombination with subsequent cascade decay of autoionizing resonance states just above the ionization threshold. These lines are dominated by low- temperature dielectronic recombination, as outlined in § 1.1.2. The population of these resonances is established by the balance between autoionization to the continuum and recombination with ensuing radiative decay to lower levels. When autoionization dominates, the population is determined by the Saha equation

g 2 3/2 X(n−1)+ h −∆Et/kTe N = NeN e (3.2) X(n−1)+ Xn+ 2g 2πm kT Xn+ e e where N and N are the population of ions with eﬀective positive charge Xn+ X(n−1)+ n and (n−1) respectively, Ne is the number density of electrons, g is the statistical weight of the indicated state, k and h are the constants of Boltzmann and Planck respectively, me is the electron mass, Te is the electron temperature, and ∆Et is the energy of the recombined electron in the X(n−1)+ state relative to the ionization threshold [22, 119].

The Saha equation, which determines the degree of ionization of a gas, is only valid in local thermodynamic equilibrium situations where the equilibrium is established through thermal collision processes. In this case the velocity and energy distributions of the gas particles are described by the Maxwell and Boltzmann distributions respectively and local temperature can be defined. However, in many practical situations the assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium is not applicable in the energy range of interest due to significant involvement of processes other than thermal collisions in establishing the particles distribution. Examples of these non-thermal processes are recombination, photoionization, autoionization, and radiative decay. These processes can shift the distribution significantly away from its thermodynamic equilibrium state if they have substantial contribution. 3.1 Theoretical Background 58

In these cases, particles distribution should be determined through more complex balance equations in which the eﬀect of these processes on the energy and velocity of the particles is taken into account.

In the recombination calculations, to measure the departure of the state from its thermodynamic equilibrium a departure coefficient, bu, is defined as the ratio of autoionization probability to the sum of radiative and autoionization probabilities, as given by Equation 3.8. The value of this coefficient is between 0 for radiative domination (Γa Γr) and 1 for thermodynamic equilibrium where autoionization

a r dominates (Γ Γ ). A large value of bu (' 1) is then required to justify the assumption of thermodynamic equilibrium and apply the relevant physics.

In thermodynamic equilibrium situation the rate of radiationless capture is equal to the rate of autoionization, yielding [120]

S a NeNi%c = Nu Γu (3.3)

where Ne and Ni are the number density of electrons and ions respectively, %c is the

S recombination coeﬃcient for the capture process, Nu is the Saha population of the

a doubly-excited autoionizing state and Γu is the autoionization transition probability of that state. In non-thermodynamic equilibrium situation, the balance is given by

a r NeNi%c = Nu(Γu + Γu) (3.4)

where Nu is the non-thermodynamic equilibrium population of the indicated state

r and Γu is the total radiative transition probability of that state. The departure coeﬃcient bu is a gauge of the deviation of the population of an autoionizing state from its thermodynamic equilibrium value, and hence is the ratio of the non-thermodynamic equilibrium population to the Saha population. Comparing 3.1 Theoretical Background 59

Equations 3.3 and 3.4 gives

a Nu Γu bu = S = a r (3.5) Nu Γu + Γu

In the following we summarize the theoretical background for our recombination and emissivity calculations as implemented in the ‘Emissivity’ code [121]

r • The calculations start by obtaining the radiative transition probability Γul for all free-free transitions as given by

3 2 r α Ep gl ful Γul = (3.6) 2gu τo

where α is the ﬁne structure constant, Ep is the photon energy in Ryd, gl

and gu are the statistical weights of the lower and upper states respectively,

ful is the oscillator strength of the transition between the upper and lower

states, and τo is the atomic time unit. This is followed by obtaining the

r radiative transition probability Γul for all free-bound transitions, as in the case of free-free transitions.

r • The total radiative transition probability Γu for all resonances is then found. This is the probability of radiative decay from an upper resonance state to all accessible lower resonances and bound states. This probability is found

r by summing up the individual probabilities Γul over all lower free and bound states l for which a transition is possible according to the electric dipole rules, that is

r X r Γu = Γul (3.7) l 3.1 Theoretical Background 60

• The departure coeﬃcient, bu, for all resonances is then obtained

a Γu bu = a r (3.8) Γu + Γu

a r where Γu and Γu are the autoionization and total radiative transition probabilities of state u respectively, and Γa is given by

∆ Γa = r (3.9) ~

where ∆r is the full width at half maximum of the autoionizing state and ~ is the reduced Planck’s constant.

• The next step is to calculate the population of resonances by summing up two components: the Saha capture, and the radiative decay from all upper levels. In thermodynamic equilibrium the rate of radiationless capture and the rate of autoionization are equal, that is

S a NeNi%c = Nl Γl (3.10)

where Ne and Ni are the number density of electrons and ions respectively,

S %c is the recombination coeﬃcient for the capture process, Nl is the Saha

a population of the autoionizing state and Γl is the autoionization transition probability of that state. In non-thermodynamic equilibrium situation, the population and depopulation of the autoionizing state due to radiative decay from upper states and to lower states respectively should be included, and hence the balance is given by

X r a r NeNi%c + NuΓul = Nl(Γl + Γl ) (3.11) u 3.1 Theoretical Background 61

where Nl is the non-thermodynamic equilibrium population of the doubly-

r excited autoionizing state, Γl is the total radiative transition probability of

r that state, Γul is the radiative transition probability from an upper state u to the autoionzing state l, and the sum is over all upper states that can decay to the autoionzing state. Combining Equations 3.10 and 3.11 yields

S a X r a r Nl Γl + NuΓul = Nl(Γl + Γl ) (3.12) u

On manipulating Equation 3.12 algebraically, the following relation can be obtained

a r Γ X NuΓ N = N S l + ul l l Γa + Γr Γr + Γa l l u l l r X NuΓ = N Sb + ul (3.13) l l Γr + Γa u l l

where bl is the departure coeﬃcient of the autoionizing state.

• The next step is to calculate the radiative transition probabilities of the

r bound-bound transitions, Γul. In these calculations the f-values can be in length form or velocity form; however the length form values may be more reliable as they converge rather quickly [122]. The ‘Emissivity’ code therefore uses the length form of the oscillator strengths where they are read from the

r f-value ﬁle ‘FVALUE’ produced by the R-matrix code. The calculation of Γul for the bound-bound transitions is then followed by ﬁnding the total radiative

r r transition probability of the bound states, Γu, by summing up Γul over all lower bound states l accessible to an upper bound state u, as given earlier by Equation 3.7 for the case of autoionizing states. 3.2 Autoionizing and Bound States Calculations 62

• The population of the bound states is then obtained

r X NuΓ N = ul (3.14) l Γr u l

where the index u includes all upper free and bound states that can decay to the bound state l.

• Finally, all possible free-free, free-bound and bound-bound transitions which are allowed by the selection rules of electric dipole approximation are found.

The emissivity, ε, of all the recombination lines that arise from a transition from an upper state u to a lower state l is then computed using the relation

r εul = NuΓulhν (3.15)

r where Nu is the population of the upper state, Γul is the radiative transition probability between the upper and lower states, h is the Planck’s constant, and ν is the frequency of the transition line. The equivalent eﬀective re-

combination coeﬃcient %f , which is linked to the emissivity by the following relation, can also be computed

ε %f = (3.16) NeNihν

where Ne and Ni are the number density of the electrons and ions respectively.

3.2 Autoionizing and Bound States Calculations

The main computing tools that were used in this part to generate theoretical data is RMATRX-I code and its companions (i.e. K-matrix implementation in stage STGF and STGQB code) though Autostructure was occasionally used to accom- 3.2.1 Methods for Investigating Resonances 63 plish complementary tasks. In the ﬁrst part of this section, three methods for ﬁnding and analyzing resonances are presented. However, the main focus will be on the two methods that were used in our investigation of the recombination lines of C ii. The remaining parts will be dedicated to practical aspects.

3.2.1 Methods for Investigating Resonances

The resonance phenomenon is a highly important feature in atomic collisions as it plays a vital role in electron scattering with atoms, ions and molecules. The Auger effect is one of the early examples of the resonance effects that have been discovered and extensively investigated. There are several methods for finding and analyzing resonances that arise during the recombination processes. In the following sections we outline three of these methods; two of which are used in the current study to

ﬁnd and analyze resonances of C ii. These two are the K-matrix method which was developed and implemented by modifying stage STGF of the R-matrix code as part of this study, and the QB method of Quigley and Berrington [123], which is implemented in the STGQB code of Quigley and coworkers [114] as an extension to the R-matrix code. The essence of the K-matrix method is to identify the resonance position and width from locating the poles of the K-matrix on the energy mesh, while the essence of the QB method is to apply a ﬁtting procedure to the reactance matrix eigenphase near the resonance position using the analytic properties of the R-matrix theory. The third method is the Time-Delay of Stibbe and Tennyson [124] which is implemented in a computer code called TIMEDEL. This method is based on the use of the lifetime eigenvalues to locate the resonance position and identify its width. We tried to implement and use this method in an early stage of our investigation before developing the K-matrix method, but this attempt was abandoned in favor of the K-matrix method. 3.2.1.1 QB Method 64

3.2.1.1 QB Method

A common approach for finding and analyzing resonances is to apply a fitting procedure to the reactance matrix, K, or its eigenphase as a function of energy in the neighborhood of an autoionizing state. However, fitting the K-matrix itself is complicated because the reactance matrix has a pole at the energy position of the autoionizing state. An easier alternative is to fit the arc-tangent of the reactance matrix. The latter approach was employed by Bartschat and Burke [125] in their fitting code RESFIT.

The eigenphase sum is deﬁned by

N X δ = arctan Λi (3.17) i=1 where Λi is an eigenvalue of the K-matrix and the sum runs over all open channels interacting with the autoionizing state. The eigenphase sum is normally ﬁtted to a Breit-Wigner form ∆ δ = δ + arctan r (3.18) 2 (Er − E) where δ is the sum of the background eigenphase, ∆r is the resonance width, Er is the energy position of the resonance, and E is the energy. This approach was used by Tennyson and Noble [126] in their ﬁtting code RESON [127].

In theory, an autoionizing state exhibits itself as a sharp increase by π radians in the eigenphase sum as a function of energy superimposed on a slowly-varying background. However, due to the ﬁnite width of resonances and the background variation over their proﬁle, the increase may not be by π precisely in the actual calculations. A more practical approach then is to identify the position of the resonance from the energy location where the increase in the eigenphase sum is at its highest rate by having a maximum gradient with respect to the scattering 3.2.1.1 QB Method 65

energy, i.e. (dδ/dE)max [123, 126].

The QB method of Quigley and Berrington [123] is a computational technique for finding and analyzing autoionizing states that arise in atomic and molecular scattering processes using eigenphase fitting. The merit of the QB method over other eigenphase fitting procedures is that it utilizes the analytical properties of the R-matrix method to determine the variation of the reactance matrix with respect to the scattering energy analytically. This analytical approach can avoid possible weaknesses, linked to the calculations of K-matrix poles and arc-tangents, when numerical procedures are employed instead. The derivative of the reactance matrix with respect to the scattering energy in the neighborhood of a resonance can then be used in the fitting procedure to identify the energy position and width of the resonance.

The QB method begins by deﬁning two matrices, Q and B, in terms of asymptotic solutions, the R-matrix and energy derivatives, such that

dK = B−1Q (3.19) dE

The eigenphase gradients of the K-matrix with respect to energy can then be calculated. This is followed by identifying the resonance position, Er, from the point of maximum gradient at the energy mesh, and the resonance width, ∆r,

0 which is linked to the eigenphase gradient at the resonance position, δ (Er), by the relation 2 ∆r = 0 (3.20) δ (Er)

This equation may be used to calculate the widths of a number of resonances in a ﬁrst approximation. A background correction due to overlapping proﬁles can then be introduced on these widths individually to obtain a better estimate.

The QB method was implemented in the STGQB code of Quigley and coworkers 3.2.1.2 Time-Delay Method 66

[114] as an extension to the R-matrix code. In the current study, STGQB was used as a supplementary tool for verifying the results of the K-matrix method.

3.2.1.2 Time-Delay Method

The Time-Delay method of Stibbe and Tennyson [124] is based on the time-delay theory of Smith [128]. According to this theory, the time-delay matrix M is deﬁned in terms of the scattering matrix S by

∗ dS M = −i ~ S (3.21) dE where i is the imaginary unit, ~ (= h/2π) is the reduced Planck’s constant, S∗ is the complex conjugate of S, and E is the energy. It has been demonstrated by Smith [128] that the eigenvalues of the M-matrix represent the collision lifetimes and the largest of these eigenvalues corresponds to the longest time-delay of the scattered particle. For a resonance, the time-delay has a Lorentzian profile with a maximum precisely at the resonance position. By computing the energy-dependent time-delay from the reactance matrix, and fitting it to a Lorentzian peak shape, the resonance position can be located and its width is identified.

This method, as implemented in the TIMEDEL program of Stibbe and Ten- nyson [124], uses the reactance K-matrix as an input, either from a readily-available archived scattering calculations or from dynamically-performed computations on an adjustable mesh. The S-matrix is then formed using the relation

I + iK S = (3.22) I − iK where I is the identity matrix, and i is the imaginary unit. The time-delay M- matrix is then calculated from Equation 3.21, with numerical evaluation of the 3.2.1.3 K-Matrix Method 67

S-matrix derivative, and diagonalized to find the eigenvalues and hence obtain the longest time-delay of the incident particle. Approximate resonance positions are then identified from the energy locations of the maxima in the time-delay profile, and the widths are estimated from the Lorentzian fit. On testing the degree of overlapping of neighboring resonances, TIMEDEL decides if the resonances should be fitted jointly or separately.

3.2.1.3 K-Matrix Method

Resonances arise from poles in the scattering matrix S which varies slowly with energy. The K-matrix method used in the current study is based on the fact that for the low-lying resonances just above the C2+ 1s2 2s2 1Se ionization threshold, the scattering matrix S has only one channel, and hence the reactance matrix, K, is a real scalar with a pole near the resonance position at the energy mesh.

According to the collision theory of Smith [128], the lifetime matrix M is related to the S-matrix by Equation 3.21. Now, a K-matrix with a pole at energy E0

superimposed on a background Ko can be approximated by

g Ki = Ko + (3.23) Ei − E0

where Ki is the value of the K-matrix at energy Ei and g is a physical parameter with dimension of energy. In AppendixA we revealed that in the case of single- channel scattering the M-matrix is real with a value given by

−2g = (3.24) M 2 2 2 (1 + Ko )(E − E0) + 2Ko g(E − E0) + g

Using the fact demonstrated by Smith [128] that the lifetime of the state is the expectation value of M, it can be shown from Equation 3.24 that the position of 3.2.2 Preparing Target 68

the resonance peak Er is given by

K g = − o (3.25) Er E0 2 1 + Ko

while the full width at half maximum ∆E is given by

|2g| ∆ = (3.26) E 2 1 + Ko

The two parameters of primary interest to our investigation are the resonance energy position Er, and the resonance width ∆r which equals the full width at half maximum ∆E. However, for an energy point Ei with a K-matrix value Ki,

Equation 3.23 has three unknowns, Ko , g and E0, which are needed to ﬁnd Er and ∆r. Hence, three energy points at the immediate neighborhood of E0 are required to identify these unknowns. As the K-matrix changes sign at the pole, the neighborhood of E0 is located by testing the K-matrix value at each point of the energy mesh for sign change. Consequently, the three points are obtained and used to ﬁnd Er and ∆r. Complete derivation of the K-matrix method is given in AppendixA.

3.2.2 Preparing Target

We used the R-matrix code [104], and Autostructure [41, 102, 103] to compute the properties of autoionizing and bound states of C+. The first step in the R-matrix is to have a target for the scattering calculations. In our study, orbitals describing the C2+ target for the R-matrix scattering calculations were taken from Berrington et al [129], who used a target comprising the six terms 2s2 1Se, 2s2p 3Po, 1Po and 2p2 3Pe, 1De, 1Se, constructed from seven orthogonal orbitals; three physical and four pseudo orbitals. These orbitals are: 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 3d and 4f, where the bar 3.2.3 Developing and Implementing K-matrix Method 69 denotes a pseudo orbital. The purpose of including pseudo orbitals is to represent electron correlation effects and to improve the target wavefunctions. The radial parts, Pnl(r), of these orbitals are Slater Type Orbital, defined by Equation 2.25, generated by the CIV3 program of Hibbert [115]. The values of these parameters are given in Table 3.1.

In this work we construct a scattering target of 26 terms which include the 6 terms of Berrington et al [129] plus all terms of the conﬁgurations 2s3l and 2p3l, l = 0, 1, 2. This includes the terms outside the n = 2 complex which make the largest contribution to the dipole polarizability of the 2s2 1Se and 2s2p 3Po states of C2+. Autostructure was used to decide which terms of the target have the largest polarizability. This is based on the fact that the contribution to polarizability is proportional to the ratio of the oscillator strength of transition between levels i and

2 j to the square of the corresponding energy diﬀerence (i.e. Cp ∝ fij/∆Eij). The Autostructure input data ﬁle for this calculation is given in § D.2.1 of AppendixD.

3.2.3 Developing and Implementing K-matrix Method

In the early stages of our theoretical investigation to C+ autoionizing states, we experienced numerical instabilities, convergence diﬃculties and failures from the QB method as implemented in the STGQB code. It was necessary, therefore, to verify the results that we obtained from QB by an independent method and ﬁll the gaps left by the failure of STGQB to converge in some cases due to limitation on the width of resonances as it was established afterwards. This motivated the development of K-matrix approach which we implemented in the STGF stage by searching for sign-change in the K-matrix at the poles. This came after an attempt to implement the time-delay method of Stibbe and Tennyson [124] once within STGF stage and another time as a stand-alone program that processes the data 3.2.3 Developing and Implementing K-matrix Method 70 produced by STGF. However, this attempt was abandoned in favor of the K-matrix approach which relies on the same physical principle as the time-delay method.

To improve the performance of the K-matrix method, which proved to be very successful and computationally efficient, an interactive graphical technique was also developed to read the K-matrix data directly and plot it against energy or arbitrary ordinal number while searching for poles. With a reasonably fine mesh, a positive or negative pulse in the graph appears even when the background is sufficiently large to prevent sign-change. As soon as this is detected, the search is stopped and resumed at higher resolution by focusing on a very narrow energy

Table 3.1: The seven orbitals used to construct the C2+ target and their Slater Type Orbital parameters. The bar marks the pseudo orbitals. Orbital Ci Pi ξi 1s 21.28251 1 5.13180 6.37632 1 8.51900 0.08158 2 2.01880 -2.61339 2 4.73790 -0.00733 2 1.57130 2s -5.39193 1 5.13180 -1.49036 1 8.51900 5.57151 2 2.01880 -5.25090 2 4.73790 0.94247 2 1.57130 3s 5.69321 1 1.75917 -19.54864 2 1.75917 10.39428 3 1.75917 2p 1.01509 2 1.47510 3.80119 2 3.19410 2.75006 2 1.83070 0.89571 2 9.48450 3p 14.41203 2 1.98138 -10.88586 3 1.96954 3d 5.84915 3 2.11997 4f 9.69136 4 2.69086 3.2.3 Developing and Implementing K-matrix Method 71 band using a fine mesh, and hence very small number of energy points are needed to find the resonance. The strategy is to start the search with a coarse mesh over the suspected energy range. If the glitch failed to appear, the search is repeated with finer mesh until the glitch is observed. This graphical technique was essential for finding resonances in reasonably short time compared to the time required by STGQB. In a later stage, non-graphical tools for pole searching were developed and used. The purpose of these tools is to search for any sudden increase or decrease in the background of the K-matrix. As soon as this is detected, a search for poles with a finer mesh is resumed. These non-graphic tools proved to be more efficient than the graphic tools, and hence they helped substantially in finding most of the resonances with limited time and computational effort. It is noteworthy that the K-matrix method as implemented in STGF stage is completely automatic and can find and identify resonances without user interaction. The purpose of these graphic and non-graphic tools is to speed up the search and save the computing resources by reducing the required CPU time.

In this paragraph we present a brief comparison between these two methods (i.e. K-matrix and QB) and assess their roles in this study and any possible future investigation. The main results of these methods are presented in Table E.2. As seen, K-matrix and QB produce identical results in most cases. However, K-matrix is computationally superior in terms of the required computational resources, mainly CPU time, especially when coupled with the above-mentioned interactive graphic and non-graphic techniques. In fact we obtained most of the QB results guided by the K-matrix results which were obtained earlier. Without K-matrix it would be extremely hard and time consuming to obtain results for some resonances, especially the very narrow ones, by QB directly. In general, the purpose of obtaining QB results is to check the K-matrix results and compare the two methods. An- other advantage of the K-matrix method is that it has a wider range of validity 3.2.4 Calculations 72 with regard to the resonance width, that is in principle it can be used to ﬁnd resonances with any width. The QB method fails to converge when the resonance width falls below a certain limit, whereas the only observable constraint on the K-matrix method is machine precision. Nevertheless, the QB method is more general as it deals with multi-channel resonances, as well as single-channel resonances, while the K-matrix method in its current formulation is restricted to single-channel resonances.

3.2.4 Calculations

Using the above-mentioned 26-term target, extensive calculations were carried out using the R-matrix code in intermediate coupling (IC) scheme by including the one-body terms of the Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian as outlined in Chapter2. The IC was achieved by utilizing stage STGJK of the R-matrix code with the levels and Jπ-symmetries identiﬁcation. Sample calculations in LS-coupling were also performed in an early stage on typical case studies for validation and test. The intermediate coupling scheme is required for a comprehensive C ii recombination lines investigation as many states and transitions do not exist within LS-coupling. An important case is the quartets as well as some doublet states which do not autoionize within LS-coupling scheme where the LSπ are not conserved. The requirement for the intermediate coupling arises from the fact that in LS-coupling the conserved quantities are LSπ and hence only the doublet states that conserve these quantities, such as 2Se and 2Po, can autoionize. Therefore, in LS-coupling no autoionization is allowed for the quartet terms and some doublet states, such as 2So and 2Pe. However, under intermediate coupling scheme the conserved quantities are Jπ, therefore the LS-allowed and LS-forbidden states with the same Jπ mix up giving access to channels that were formerly inaccessible, and hence these states can autoionize. This is schematically depicted in Figure 3.1. 3.2.4 Calculations 73

Figure 3.1: Schematic diagram of the low-lying autoionizing quartet and doublet states and their interaction in intermediate coupling scheme.

To investigate the convergence and numerical stability, the number of continuum basis orbitals used to express the wavefunction in the inner region (MAXC in STG1 of the R-matrix code) was varied between 6-41 and the results were analyzed. It was noticed that increasing the number of basis functions, with all ensuing computational costs, does not necessarily improve the results; moreover a convergence instability may occur in some cases. It was decided therefore to use MAXC = 16 in all calculations as a compromise between the computational resources requirement and accuracy. The eﬀect of varying the size of the inner region radius A in the R-matrix formulation was also investigated and a value of 10 atomic units was chosen on the basis of numerical stability and convergence, that is the resulting values do not change on increasing the radius.

Concerning the investigation of resonances, initially all computational work was carried out using the STGQB code since this was the only available tool before developing and implementing the K-matrix approach. Several parameters of the QB method were systematically inspected. The effect of varying the accuracy 3.2.4 Calculations 74 parameter, AC, in STGQB was investigated and a value of 10−6 was chosen for all calculations as a deal between accuracy and speed. The effect of modifying the step size for the effective quantum number mesh was studied and beside missing some resonances when the step is not appropriately small as expected, it is observed that in some cases the resonance position and width may depend on the step size. Including the first order perturbation in the long-range coupling potentials when calculating the reactance matrix was also examined by turning ‘IPERT’ flag on and off (i.e. IPERT = 1 and 0) but no tangible change was observed. We therefore concluded that the perturbative treatment is not implemented in the STGQB code.

The development of the K-matrix method provided a way for checking and filling the gaps of the QB results. In the initial formulation of the K-matrix the background was ignored, and although there was good agreement between QB and K-matrix in some cases where the background is small, there was significant differences in the other cases. Consequently, the current formulation which takes into account the effect of background was developed after some checking using Au- tostructure. The results produced by the K-matrix method, which are presented in Table E.2, are perturbation-free, i.e. with ‘IPERT = NO’ in the stage STGF. The- oretical data with perturbative treatment was also produced for some resonances at an early stage, but this work was abandoned. The main reason is the highly time-consuming nature of the perturbative calculations. It is estimated that such calculations are by a factor of 5-10 times slower than that with the perturbative treatment off, i.e. when ‘IPERT=NO’ [113]. Our personal experience confirms this estimation.

With regard to sampling the three points for the K-matrix calculations, it was observed that sampling the points very close to the pole makes the energy position and width of resonances susceptible to fluctuations and instabilities. Therefore, a sampling scheme was adopted in which the points are selected from a broad 3.3 f-Values Calculations 75 range not too close to the pole. This approach was implemented by generating two meshes, coarse and fine, around the pole as soon as the pole is found. To check the results, several different three-point combinations for each resonance were used to find the position and width of the resonance. In each case, the results from these different combinations were compared. In all cases they were identical within acceptable numerical errors. This verified that the sampling scheme is reliable. The results of QB confirm this conclusion as they agree with the K-matrix results as can be seen in Table E.2.

The results for all bound and autoionizing states are given in Tables E.1 and

E.2. In total, 142 bound states belonging to 11 symmetries (2J = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 even and 2J = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 odd) and 61 resonances belonging to 11 symmetries (2J = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 even and 2J = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 odd) were theoretically identified. As seen in Tables E.1 and E.2, the theoretical results for both bound and resonance states agree very well with the available experimental data both in energy levels and in fine structure splitting. Experimental energies are not available for the very broad resonances as they are difficult to find experimentally. The maximum discrepancy between experiment and theory in the worst case does not exceed a few percent. Furthermore, the ordering of the energy levels is the same between the theoretical and experimental in most cases. Order reversal in some cases is indicated by a minus sign in the fine structure splitting. The input data for the R-matrix which are used to perform these calculations are given in § D.1 in AppendixD.

3.3 f-Values Calculations

The oscillator strengths for all types of transition (i.e. free-free, free-bound and bound-bound) are required to ﬁnd the radiative probabilities for these transitions. In the following three sections we outline the procedures that we followed to produce 3.3.1 f-Values for Free-Free Transitions 76 the f-values for FF, FB and BB transitions.

3.3.1 f-Values for Free-Free Transitions

As there is no free-free stage in the available R-matrix code, the f-values for the FF transitions were generated by Autostructure in the intermediate coupling scheme where 60 electron configurations were included in the atomic specification of the Autostructure input: 2s2 nl (2p≤ nl ≤7s), 2s2p nl (2p≤ nl ≤7s), 2p3, and 2p2 nl (3s≤ nl ≤7s). An iterative procedure was followed to find the orbital scaling parameters (λ’s) for Autostructure before producing the required data. These scaling parameters are given in Table 3.2. The scaling parameters, which are obtained by Autostructure in an automated optimization variational process, are required to minimize the weighted energy sum of the included target states

[32, 102, 130]. The Autostructure input data for generating the f-values for the free-free transitions is given in § D.2.3 in AppendixD. It should be remarked that

Autostructure, with the same input data, was also used to generate f-values for the free-bound transitions and the bound-bound transitions that involve the 8 topmost bound states, namely the 1s2 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo and 4Do levels, as these states have large eﬀective quantum number and hence are not accessible to the RMATRX-I code. Because Autostructure produces data only to a certain level of approximation

(i.e. the f-value is ignored when it falls below a certain limit) some of the entries were missing from the ‘olg’ ﬁle of the Autostructure output and hence zero was inserted for these missing entries in the oscillator strength ﬁles required by the ‘Emissivity’ code. 3.3.2 f-Values for Free-Bound Transitions 77

Table 3.2: Orbital scaling parameters (λ’s) for Autostructure input. The rows stand for the principal quantum number n, while the columns stand for the orbital angular momentum quantum number l. s p d f g h 1 1.43240 2 1.43380 1.39690 3 1.25760 1.20290 1.35930 4 1.25830 1.19950 1.35610 1.41460 5 1.26080 1.20020 1.35770 1.41420 1.32960 6 1.26370 1.20250 1.36210 1.41520 1.41420 2.34460 7 1.26790

3.3.2 f-Values for Free-Bound Transitions

The f-values for more than 2500 free-bound transitions were computed by integrating the peaks of the photoionization cross sections (in mega barn) over the photon energy (in Rydberg). This was done for each bound state and for all resonances in the corresponding cross-section. The area under the cross-section curve comprises a background contribution, assumed linear with energy, and the contribution due to the resonance, which is directly related to the bound-free oscillator strength. The background contribution was therefore removed by subtracting the linear fit at the bottom of the profile from the peak. The computation of oscillator strengths from integrating the peaks of the photoionization cross sections is based on the fact that the contribution of a resonance to the recombination rate correlates to the area underneath, and hence it quantifies the oscillator strength between the resonance and the interacting state, while the width of a resonance depends on the strength of the interaction with the continuum [131]. Therefore, the first step in these computations is to obtain the photoionization cross section of a particular transition from a lower bound-state l to the continuum, σ(l→u). Since the resonance contribution to a particular radiative process is proportional to the area beneath

σ for that process, by integrating σ over energy the f-value for a transition from 3.3.2 f-Values for Free-Bound Transitions 78 an upper resonance state u to a lower bound state l is found.

In the following points we outline the general procedure that was followed to compute the oscillator strengths for the FB transitions:

• RESMESH program of P.J. Storey [private communication] was used to create an energy mesh that maps the resonances in the most precise way. The input data required by RESMESH are the position and width of resonances, the energy range of the mesh and an integral error index. In our case, the positions and widths of resonances were obtained by the K-matrix method as implemented in stage STGF of the R-matrix code. It should be remarked that a separate energy mesh was used to generate photoionization cross section data for each individual resonance with a reﬁnement process to ensure correct mapping and to avoid peak overlapping from diﬀerent resonances.

• The mesh generated by RESMESH was then used as an input to stage STGF of the R-matrix code to create F-ﬁles which contain the required data for resonances.

• Stage STGBF was then run to create ‘XSECTN’ ﬁle which contains the data for photoionization cross sections (in mega barn) versus photon energies (in Ryd). Plots of some representative cross-sections are shown in Figure 3.2 which displays a number of examples of photoionization cross sections of the indicated bound states close to the designated autoionizing states versus photon energy on linear-linear graphs.

• The peaks of the photoionization cross sections were extracted by graphic

techniques. The numerical data were then used to obtain the f-values by integrating the photoionization cross sections over photon energy using a 3-point Simpson’s rule. A piece of code from P.J. Storey [private communication] was used to perform the integration with the required scaling. Visual 3.3.2 f-Values for Free-Bound Transitions 79

inspection to each peak during the extraction of data and computing the oscillator strengths was carried out to check the goodness of profile and verify that it contains sufficient number of points. In general, the data points that define the peak profile and which are used for the integrated cross sections were chosen to be as close as possible to the background on both sides considering some sort of symmetry and avoiding mixing with other resonances. The possibility of mixing between neighboring resonances was eliminated later on by producing photoionization cross section data (‘XSECTN’ files) for each resonance independently with the adoption of one-resonance mesh approach, as will be discussed next.

A refinement process was used to improve the positions of the resonances by inputting the results of one run to the next during mesh generation and data creation. The purpose of refinement is to optimize the position of resonances and obtain optimal resonance profiles. In the refinement process the RESMESH cycle, as outlined in the previous steps, was repeated several times (about five) where the results of one cycle was fed to the next. To find the positions in each cycle, all the peaks belonging to the resonance of interest are obtained from ‘XSECTN’ file created in that cycle. The energy position of the largest peak was then taken as an input to RESMESH in the next run. As the refinement progresses, the situation steadily improves in terms of peaks height and shape until it stabilizes where no improvement is observed on performing more iterations. Most of this process was carried out by automated procedures, and the results were thoroughly inspected and checked.

Initially a single mesh was used to optimize the position of all resonances in a single run. This is based on the assumption that the results will improve in general as the reﬁnement progresses from one cycle to the next. However, it was observed that although the results generally do improve for some resonances they deteriorate 3.3.2 f-Values for Free-Bound Transitions 80

8 x 10 2.5

1.5

0.5

0 1.422259535 1.422259540 1.422259545 1.422259550 1.422259555 3 o 4 o 2 4 e (a) 2s2p( P )3d P1/2 resonance in 2s2p P1/2 cross-section.

0.5

0.45

0.4

0.35

0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0 1.6280 1.6281 1.6282 1.6283 1.6284 1.6285 3 o 2 o 2 4 e (b) 2s2p( P )4d F5/2 resonance in 2s2p P3/2 cross-section.

4 x 10 15

0 0.575353 0.575354 0.575355 0.575356 0.575357 0.575358 3 o 2 e 3 2 o (c) 2s2p( P )4p P3/2 resonance in 2p D5/2 cross-section.

Figure 3.2: Examples of photoionization cross sections in mega barn (y-axis) of the indicated bound states near to the designated autoionizing states versus photon energy in Rydberg (x-axis). 3.3.2 f-Values for Free-Bound Transitions 81 for others. Moreover, there was a considerable overlap between some resonances especially for those from multiplets belonging to diﬀerent symmetries.

A new approach of refinement was then started by continuing the refinement for the ones that continue to improve while holding the deteriorated ones at the position of their best photoionization cross section value. However, the results did not move in the anticipated direction and similar behavior to the previous (i.e. deterioration for some resonances) was observed. The apparent conclusion is that the resonances within a mesh interact, and therefore it is difficult to control the individual resonances within the mesh. Another serious problem with the single mesh is the size of the data files and the confusion created by the simultaneous presence of many resonances for each data set belonging to each bound state. Moreover, when resonances are too broad or too close to each other they mix up creating more reasons for confusion and error. These factors made processing the data without serious errors unfeasible.

A different approach was therefore adopted by generating a mesh for each individual resonance. The advantage of this approach is that it requires less effort in data extraction and produces more reliable results. Moreover, the extraction of data can be highly automated. The biggest advantage of the one-resonance mesh approach is that for the multiplets of the very broad resonances, such as the doublet 2s2p(3Po)4s 2Po and 2Po , separate peak profiles are obtained for each 1/2 3/2 level, whereas only one peak profile which combines the profiles of these two levels was obtained in the previous attempts using the single-mesh approach. However, the one-resonance mesh requires more preparation work since preparing the data and running the code are repeated as many times as the number of resonances.

As indicated in § 3.3.1, Autostructure was used to produce f-values for the FB transitions that involve the 8 topmost bound states due to the R-matrix limitation related to the large eﬀective quantum number of these states. 3.3.3 f-Values for Bound-Bound Transitions 82

3.3.3 f-Values for Bound-Bound Transitions

No special eﬀort was required to compute the f-values for the bound-bound transitions as these calculations were performed using stage STGBB of the R-matrix code. The input data for the R-matrix stages which were used to generate these data are given in § D.1 in AppendixD. As indicated in § 3.3.1, Autostructure was used to produce f-values for the BB transitions that involve the 8 topmost bound states due to the R-matrix limitation related to the large eﬀective quantum number of these states.

3.4 Recombination and Emissivity Calculations

Emissivity and recombination calculations are the third major part of our work on the C ii recombination lines. We are concerned with spectral lines formed by dielectronic capture followed by radiative decay. Including only these two processes and autoionization, the number density, Nl of a state l is given by

X r a r NeNi%c + NuΓul = Nl(Γl + Γl ) (3.27) u

a where %c is the rate coeﬃcient for dielectronic capture to state l and Γl is the autoionization probability of that state, related by

Nl a %c = Γl (3.28) NeNi S where the subscript S refers to the value of the ratio given by the Saha equation, and Ne and Ni are the number densities of electrons and ions respectively. If state

a l lies below the ionization limit, %c = Γl = 0. Equation 3.27 can be solved for the populations l by a stepwise downward iteration using the ‘Emissivity’ code 3.4.1 Practical Aspects 83

[121]. Full account of the theoretical infrastructure of the ‘Emissivity’ code, which include the computation of the emissivities and their equivalent eﬀective recombination coeﬃcients which are the physical parameters of primary interest to this investigation, is given in § 3.1.

As part of this investigation, the C ii lines from several observational line lists found in the literature, such as that of Sharpee et al [4] for the planetary nebula

IC 418, were analyzed using our theoretical line list and all correctly-identified C ii recombination lines in these observational lists were identified in our theoretical list apart from very few exceptions which are outside our wavelength range. The analysis also produced an electron temperature for the line-emitting regions of a number of astronomical objects in reasonably good agreement with the values obtained by other researchers using different data and employing other techniques. The details of this investigation are reported in Chapter4.

3.4.1 Practical Aspects

Regarding the input data used in the transition lines calculations, all theoretical data for the energy of resonances and bound states were replaced with experimental data from NIST when such experimental data were available. This is based on the approach of Nussbaumer and Storey which was mentioned in Section 1.2.1. The use of experimental positions removes the uncertainty and errors which are usually introduced by ab initio calculations.

It should be remarked that all transitions in our calculations are subject to the electric dipole (E1) rules. Also, the data of SS1 list are generated assuming electron and ion number density of 1010 m−3. Another remark is that the autoionization and radiative probabilities in the emissivity calculations as outlined in § 3.1 can also be obtained from Autostructure. In the early stages of this research such an approach 3.5 Comparison to Previous Work 84 was adopted by producing some data by RMATRX-I and some by Autostructure. According to the old approach, the widths of resonances are first obtained by the K-matrix method; from which the autoionization transition probabilities, Γa, are computed. The corresponding radiative transition probabilities, Γr, are then found by Autostructure. The configurations that were used in the radiative calculations are the five most important ones for C+: 1s2 2s2 3d, 1s2 2s2p2, 1s2 2s2p 3p, 1s2 2s2p 3d and 1s2 2s2p 4s. The Autostructure input data for these calculations are given in § D.2.2 in AppendixD. The departure coefficients, bu, are then calculated and the states with bu 1 are excluded from further investigation because of their very low likelihood of existence. However, this approach was abandoned afterwards because a better treatment within a more comprehensive theory can be obtained from R-matrix as we were able to produce all the required data by RMATRX- I and ‘Emissivity’ codes. The main merit of the old approach is its simplicity and computational economy. Anyway, the method was useful in checking the R- matrix results by comparing the departure coefficients from RMATRX-I to those from Autostructure. Good agreement were found in most cases between the two methods on a sample data set.

3.5 Comparison to Previous Work

In this section we make a brief comparison of some of our results against a sample of similar results obtained by other researchers in previous studies. These include autoionization probabilities, given in Table 3.3, radiative transition probabilities, given in Table 3.4, and dielectronic recombination coeﬃcients, given in Table 3.5.

In Table 3.3 we compare our calculated autoionization probabilities with those of De Marco et al [5]. They combined the LS-coupled autoionization probabilities calculated in the close coupling approximation by Davey et al [60] with one- and 3.5 Comparison to Previous Work 85 two-body ﬁne structure interactions computed with Superstructure [102] to obtain autoionization probabilities for four states that give rise to spectral lines seen in carbon-rich Wolf-Rayet stars. For the three larger probabilities, there is agreement within 25%, but for the 4f 2Ge state there is a factor of about two diﬀerence. 9/2 Because our autoionization probabilities are computed directly from the resonance widths (Equation 3.9) which are obtained from two independent methods (i.e. K- matrix and QB), we expect our values to be the more reliable ones.

Radiative transition probabilities, as seen in Table 3.4, generally show good agreement between the various calculations for the strongest electric dipole transitions. There are some significant differences for intercombination transitions, indicative of the increased uncertainty for these cases. There are also significant differences between the present results and those of Nussbaumer and Storey [117] for some of the allowed but two-electron transitions from the 1s22s23p configuration, where we would expect our results to be superior, given the larger scattering target.

In Table 3.5 we compare our results with effective recombination coefficients from Table (1) of Badnell [8]. His results are tabulated between terms, having been summed over the J of the upper and lower terms of the transition, so results for individual lines cannot be compared. Badnell only tabulates results for one transition in which the upper state is allowed to autoionize in LS-coupling (1s22s2p(3Po)3d 2Fo) and here the agreement is excellent as one might expect. On the other hand, the levels of 1s22s2p(3Po)3d 2Do have small autoionization widths and our coefficients are generally smaller than Badnell’s for transitions from this term. We note that the fine structure splitting of this term is well represented in our calculation as is its separation from neighboring states with large autoionization widths, giving us confidence in our result. 3.5 Comparison to Previous Work 86

Table 3.3: Autoionization probabilities in s−1 of four resonance states as obtained in the current work (SS) compared to those obtained by De Marco et al [5] (DSB).

State SS DSB 1s22s2p(3Po)4f 2De 9.860e10 8.263e10 5/2 1s22s2p(3Po)4f 2Ge 8.601e08 1.623e09 9/2 1s22s2p(3Po)3d 2Po 2.194e11 1.901e11 3/2 1s22s2p(3Po)3d 2Fo 1.196e12 1.488e12 7/2 3.5 Comparison to Previous Work 87 Table 3.4: A sample of radiative transition probabilities in s−1 as obtained from this work compared to corresponding values found in the literature. The prime indicates an excited 1s22s2p(3Po) core. The 1s2 core is suppressed from all conﬁgurations.

Upper Lower λv SS NS LDHK HST GKMKW FKWP DT DSB 2s2p2 4Pe 2s22p 2Po 2325.40 52.8 55.3 74.4 42.5 1/2 1/2 2s2p2 4Pe 2s22p 2Po 2324.21 1.79 1.71 1.70 1.01 3/2 1/2 2s2p2 4Pe 2s22p 2Po 2328.84 60.6 65.5 77.8 40.2 1/2 3/2 2s2p2 4Pe 2s22p 2Po 2327.64 9.34 5.24 12.4 8.11 3/2 3/2 2s2p2 4Pe 2s22p 2Po 2326.11 36.7 43.2 53.9 51.2 34.4 5/2 3/2 2s2p2 2De 2s22p 2Po 1334.53 2.40e8 2.42e8 2.38e8 2.41e8 3/2 1/2 2s2p2 2De 2s22p 2Po 1335.71 2.87e8 2.88e8 2.84e8 2.89e8 5/2 3/2 2s2p2 2De 2s22p 2Po 1335.66 4.75e7 4.78e7 4.70e7 4.79e7 3/2 3/2 2s2p2 2Se 2s22p 2Po 1036.34 7.75e8 7.74e8 7.99e8 1/2 1/2 2s2p2 2Se 2s22p 2Po 1037.02 1.53e9 1.53e9 1.59e9 1/2 3/2 2s2p2 2Pe 2s22p 2Po 903.96 2.76e9 2.74e9 2.63e9 1/2 1/2 2s2p2 2Pe 2s22p 2Po 903.62 6.92e8 6.86e8 6.58e8 3/2 1/2 2s2p2 2Pe 2s22p 2Po 904.48 1.39e9 1.38e9 1.33e9 1/2 3/2 2s2p2 2Pe 2s22p 2Po 904.14 3.46e9 3.43e9 3.30e9 3/2 3/2 2s23s 2Se 2s22p 2Po 858.09 1.26e8 1.31e8 3.69e7 1/2 1/2 2s23s 2Se 2s22p 2Po 858.56 2.46e8 2.58e8 1.11e8 1/2 3/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 4Pe 1127.13 36.3 55.5 1/2 1/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 4Pe 1126.99 58.28 97.8 3/2 1/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 4Pe 1127.41 21.8 20.3 1/2 3/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 4Pe 1127.27 14.0 22.3 3/2 3/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 4Pe 1127.63 1.86e2 2.60e2 3/2 5/2 2p3 4So 2s2p2 4Pe 1009.86 5.77e8 5.82e8 5.76e8 3/2 1/2 2p3 4So 2s2p2 4Pe 1010.08 1.15e9 1.16e9 1.15e9 3/2 3/2 2p3 4So 2s2p2 4Pe 1010.37 1.73e9 1.74e9 1.73e9 3/2 5/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 2De 1760.40 3.77e7 3.75e7 4.3e7 3/2 5/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 2De 1760.82 4.19e7 4.16e7 5.2e7 1/2 3/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 2De 1760.47 4.18e6 4.16e6 4e6 3/2 3/2 2p3 4So 2s2p2 2De 1490.38 1.03e2 45.0 3/2 5/2 2p3 4So 2s2p2 2De 1490.44 10.5 11.9 3/2 3/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 2Se 2838.44 3.61e7 3.63e7 2.2e7 1/2 1/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 2Se 2837.54 3.61e7 3.64e7 2.2e7 3/2 1/2 2p3 4So 2s2p2 2Se 2196.19 1.62 5.09 3/2 1/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 2Pe 4739.29 5.85e4 7.70e4 <3.0e5 1/2 1/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 2Pe 4736.79 7.98e3 1.19e4 <5e5 3/2 1/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 2Pe 4748.61 2.35e4 3.23e4 <2.3e5 1/2 3/2 2s23p 2Po 2s2p2 2Pe 4746.09 6.08e4 8.28e4 <1.3e5 3/2 3/2 2p3 4So 2s2p2 2Pe 3184.42 16.4 14.9 3/2 1/2 2p3 4So 2s2p2 2Pe 3188.62 80.0 76.9 3/2 3/2 2s23p 2Po 2s23s 2Se 6584.70 3.53e7 3.68e7 2.9e7 3.29e7 1/2 1/2 2s23p 2Po 2s23s 2Se 6579.87 3.54e7 3.69e7 3.4e7 3.33e7 3/2 1/2 2p3 4So 2s23s 2Se 3923.19 6.35 10.2 3/2 1/2 2s23d 2De 2s23p 2Po 7233.33 3.46e7 4.22e7 3/2 1/2 2s23d 2De 2s23p 2Po 7239.16 6.91e6 8.49e6 3/2 3/2 2s23d 2De 2s23p 2Po 7238.41 4.15e7 5.10e7 5/2 3/2 2s23d 2De 2s22p 2Po 687.05 2.40e9 2.24e9 3/2 1/2 2s23d 2De 2s22p 2Po 687.35 4.81e8 4.50e8 3/2 3/2 2s23d 2De 2s22p 2Po 687.35 2.88e9 2.70e9 5/2 3/2 2p3 2Do 2s2p2 2De 1323.91 4.33e8 4.53e8 3/2 3/2 2p3 2Do 2s2p2 2De 1324.00 3.23e7 3.38e7 5/2 3/2 2p3 2Do 2s2p2 2De 1323.86 4.91e7 5.10e7 3/2 5/2 2p3 2Do 2s2p2 2De 1323.95 4.51e8 4.71e8 5/2 5/2 2p3 2Do 2s2p2 2Pe 2509.88 4.53e7 5.38e7 3/2 1/2 2p3 2Do 2s2p2 2Pe 2512.49 8.91e6 1.06e7 3/2 3/2 2p3 2Do 2s2p2 2Pe 2512.81 5.40e7 6.43e7 5/2 3/2 4f0 2De 3d0 2Po 5115.07 1.18e8 6.94e7 5/2 3/2 4f0 2Ge 3d0 2Fo 4620.54 2.29e8 1.84e8 9/2 7/2 3d0 2Po 3p0 2Pe 4966.12 3.14e7 2.89e7 3/2 3/2 3d0 2Fo 3p0 2De 8796.49 2.03e7 1.99e7 7/2 5/2

SS = current work, NS = Nussbaumer and Storey [117]; LDHK = Lennon et al [132]; HST = Huber et al [133]; GKMKW = Glenzer et al [134]; FKWP = Fang et al [135]; DT = Dankwort and Treﬀtz [136], DSB = De Marco et al [5]. 3.5 Comparison to Previous Work 88

Table 3.5: Effective dielectronic recombination rate coefficients in cm3.s−1 of a number of transitions for the given 10-based logarithmic temperatures. The first row for each transition corresponds to Badnell [8], while the second row is obtained from the current work. The superscripts denotes powers of 10. The prime indicates an excited 1s22s2p(3Po) core. The 1s2 core is suppressed from all configurations.

log(T) Upper Lower 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 −24 −20 −17 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 3d0 4Fo 3p0 4De 7.27 5.73 1.56 6.17 6.47 2.61 5.52 7.43 7.25 5.65 −24 −20 −17 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 6.74 5.17 1.29 4.33 3.90 1.33 2.31 2.57 2.13 1.47 −16 −16 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −13 −14 −14 3p0 4De 3s0 4Po 1.90 3.21 8.53 4.95 1.93 4.90 8.51 1.05 9.91 7.57 −16 −16 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 1.06 1.90 7.71 5.02 1.74 3.58 4.85 4.76 3.70 2.46 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −15 −15 −15 −15 −15 3d0 2Do 3p0 2Pe 2.49 3.19 2.90 2.11 1.35 8.05 4.80 2.94 1.81 1.10 −15 −15 −15 −15 −15 −15 −15 −16 −16 −16 4.67 5.99 5.44 3.97 2.58 1.68 1.17 8.31 5.54 3.41 −16 −16 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 3p0 4Pe 3s0 4Po 3.08 5.09 9.86 4.02 1.08 1.73 2.04 1.97 1.61 1.14 −16 −16 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −15 −15 1.49 2.52 7.24 3.84 1.05 1.58 1.60 1.27 8.52 5.14 −27 −22 −18 −17 −15 −15 −15 −14 −15 −15 4f0 2Fe 3d0 2Do 3.00 6.39 1.14 9.93 1.29 5.09 9.43 1.09 9.26 6.51 −27 −22 −19 −17 −16 −15 −15 −15 −15 −15 1.64 3.53 6.33 5.54 7.22 2.82 5.18 5.88 4.94 3.43 −27 −22 −18 −16 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 4f0 4De 3d0 4Po 2.56 7.68 1.70 1.70 2.40 9.95 1.90 2.21 1.89 1.33 −27 −22 −18 −16 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 2.54 7.63 1.69 1.69 2.39 9.86 1.87 2.17 1.85 1.29 −20 −17 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −15 −15 4s0 4Po 3p0 4Pe 2.59 1.23 4.65 3.58 1.01 1.51 1.51 1.18 7.80 4.67 −20 −17 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −15 −15 2.63 1.25 4.72 3.63 1.02 1.53 1.53 1.19 7.83 4.68 −27 −21 −18 −16 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 4f0 4Fe 3d0 4Do 5.39 1.16 2.07 1.81 2.37 9.41 1.77 2.07 1.79 1.27 −27 −22 −18 −16 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −15 3.48 7.51 1.35 1.19 1.55 6.07 1.11 1.26 1.06 7.37 −27 −21 −18 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 4f0 4Ge 3d0 4Fo 5.42 1.50 3.15 3.05 4.24 1.74 3.30 3.86 3.32 2.34 −27 −22 −18 −16 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 2.98 8.25 1.73 1.68 2.33 9.49 1.78 2.06 1.75 1.22 −20 −17 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −15 −15 4s0 4Po 3p0 4De 2.86 1.36 5.14 3.95 1.11 1.67 1.67 1.30 8.61 5.15 −20 −17 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −15 −15 3.15 1.49 5.65 4.35 1.22 1.83 1.83 1.42 9.37 5.59 −26 −21 −18 −16 −15 −15 −15 −14 −14 −15 4d0 4Fo 3p0 4De 1.77 1.71 1.85 1.18 1.30 4.85 9.35 1.18 1.10 8.31 −26 −21 −18 −16 −15 −15 −15 −15 −15 −15 1.75 1.69 1.83 1.17 1.24 4.28 7.25 7.83 6.37 4.34 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 2s2p2 2De 2s22p 2Po 2.45 5.89 8.34 8.17 6.33 4.36 3.01 2.21 1.66 1.19 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −13 −13 1.85 5.12 7.66 7.67 6.00 4.09 2.61 1.60 9.38 5.28 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 3d0 2Do 2s2p2 2Pe 2.60 3.33 3.02 2.20 1.41 8.41 5.01 3.07 1.89 1.15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −15 −15 −15 4.50 5.78 5.24 3.83 2.49 1.62 1.13 8.01 5.34 3.29 −27 −21 −18 −16 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −15 4d0 2Do 2s2p2 2Pe 6.56 1.10 1.70 1.35 1.66 6.33 1.16 1.33 1.13 8.02 −27 −22 −19 −17 −16 −15 −15 −15 −15 −15 1.98 3.29 5.03 3.97 4.85 1.82 3.26 3.64 3.03 2.09 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 2s2p2 2Pe 2s22p 2Po 2.68 3.99 5.05 5.45 4.87 3.95 3.37 3.09 2.75 2.21 −14 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −14 5.11 1.11 2.21 3.09 3.18 2.78 2.24 1.66 1.11 6.82 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −14 −14 −14 3d0 2Do 2s2p2 2De 7.38 9.47 8.59 6.26 3.99 2.39 1.42 8.71 5.38 3.25 −13 −13 −13 −13 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −15 1.36 1.75 1.59 1.16 7.53 4.90 3.43 2.42 1.61 9.95 −15 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −13 −13 −13 −14 3s0 4Po 2s2p2 4Pe 1.36 2.22 3.36 1.07 3.30 7.13 1.12 1.32 1.21 9.09 −16 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 7.17 1.19 2.35 1.02 3.12 5.78 7.22 6.71 5.05 3.29 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −13 −13 3d0 2Fo 2s2p2 2De 1.70 4.92 7.44 7.49 5.83 3.86 2.30 1.29 6.93 3.63 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −12 −13 −13 1.71 4.94 7.48 7.53 5.86 3.88 2.32 1.30 6.97 3.65 −26 −21 −18 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 4d0 2Do 2s2p2 2De 2.30 3.86 5.94 4.72 5.81 2.22 4.05 4.65 3.97 2.81 −27 −21 −18 −16 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 9.59 1.59 2.43 1.92 2.35 8.82 1.58 1.76 1.47 1.01 −24 −20 −17 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 3d0 4Do 2s2p2 4Pe 2.49 2.83 1.05 4.56 4.63 1.78 3.62 4.76 4.58 3.53 −24 −20 −18 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 2.34 2.63 9.38 3.84 3.62 1.23 2.11 2.32 1.91 1.31 −14 −13 −13 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 3d0 4Po 2s2p2 4Pe 6.71 1.08 1.13 9.07 6.36 4.86 4.61 4.51 3.87 2.84 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 3.41 5.51 5.78 4.63 3.38 2.97 3.10 2.93 2.30 1.55 −20 −17 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 4s0 4Po 2s2p2 4Pe 9.12 4.32 1.64 1.26 3.55 5.31 5.33 4.14 2.75 1.64 −19 −17 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 1.13 5.37 2.03 1.56 4.40 6.58 6.59 5.12 3.38 2.02 −26 −21 −18 −16 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 4d0 4Do 2s2p2 4Pe 4.87 6.33 8.27 5.94 6.90 2.57 4.72 5.54 4.85 3.49 −26 −21 −18 −16 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −15 1.73 2.26 2.95 2.12 2.43 8.79 1.53 1.69 1.39 9.52 −27 −22 −18 −16 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 4d0 4Po 2s2p2 4Pe 5.09 9.49 1.56 1.30 1.68 6.90 1.39 1.78 1.67 1.27 −28 −23 −19 −17 −16 −16 −16 −15 −16 −16 4.37 8.18 1.34 1.11 1.40 5.37 9.70 1.09 9.13 6.32 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −15 3p0 2Pe 2s22p 2Po 1.91 2.70 3.11 3.17 2.97 2.65 2.26 1.81 1.34 9.18 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 −15 4.59 9.59 1.86 2.67 2.99 2.83 2.31 1.66 1.06 6.26 −23 −19 −17 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 4p0 2Pe 2s22p 2Po 5.81 3.67 7.12 1.53 8.24 1.85 2.40 2.19 1.61 1.03 −23 −19 −17 −15 −15 −14 −14 −14 −14 −14 6.35 3.96 7.62 1.63 8.74 1.96 2.52 2.30 1.68 1.07 Chapter 4

Electron Temperature of Astronomical Objects

The study of transition lines of carbon and its ions in the spectra of astronomical objects, such as planetary nebulae [137–139], has implications for carbon abundance determination [9, 52, 56, 58, 117, 140], probing the physical conditions in the interstellar medium [23, 51], and element enrichment in the CNO cycle [59, 140, 141]. The lines span large parts of the electromagnetic spectrum and originate from various processes under diﬀerent physical conditions. Concerning C+, the subject of the current investigation, spectral lines of this ion have been observed in many astronomical objects such as planetary nebulae, Seyfert galaxies, stellar winds of Wolf-Rayet stars, symbiotic stars, and in the interstellar medium [3, 55, 56, 59, 60, 62, 142–144].

There are many observational and theoretical studies on the recombination lines of carbon related to the spectra of PNe [2,9, 17, 46–52, 56, 57, 61]; some of which are linked to the C+ ion [3,8, 23, 53–55, 58–60, 62]. The latter, however, are limited in number and constrained in domain.

89 CHAPTER 4. ELECTRON TEMPERATURE OF ASTRONOMICAL OBJECTS90

In this chapter we investigate the electron temperature in the emitting region of recombination lines of C+ ion in the spectra of a number of astronomical objects, mainly planetary nebulae, using a least squares optimization method with theoretical data obtained from the recently-computed theoretical line list, SS1, of [116] and astronomical data gathered from the literature. The theoretical list was generated using the R-matrix [104], Autostructure [41, 102, 103] and Emissivity [121] codes with an intermediate coupling scheme where the transition lines are produced by dielectronic recombination processes originating from the low-lying autoionizing states with subsequent cascade decays.

The traditional method of identifying electron temperature in thin plasma, found for example in planetary nebulae, is by taking the intensity ratio of two transition lines [22]. The advantage of this method is simplicity and its reliance on limited data. The disadvantage is that the lines should have strong intensity. They should also have considerable energy gap, typically of several electron volts, if collisionally-excited transitions are employed. The method can be subject to large errors if the observed intensity is contaminated with significant errors. On the other hand, the least squares minimization is a collective method that normally involves a number of lines and hence can be more reliable in identifying the electron temperature. The objective of the least squares technique is to find the temperature at which the difference between the observed data and the calculated model is minimal and hence identifying the temperature of the line-emitting region. Least squares minimization is based on the fact that this difference tends to minimum when the temperature-dependent theoretical data approaches the unknown temperature of the observation. The main tool used in the emissivity analysis is the ‘Emissivity’ code [121]. The analysis is based on minimizing the sum of weighted squared differences between the normalized theoretical emissivity and the normalized observational flux of the C ii lines. 4.1 Method 91

4.1 Method

As indicated already, the theoretical data of the C ii dielectronic recombination transitions and subsequent cascade decay are obtained from the SS1 line list of [116] which consists of 6187 optically-allowed transitions with their associated data such as emissivity and effective recombination coefficients. The autoionizing states involved in the transitions of this list consist of 64 resonances belonging to 11 symmetries (J = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 half even and J = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 half odd) which are all the resonances above the threshold of C2+ 1s2 2s2 1Se with a principal quantum number n < 5 for the combined electron. These include 61 theoretically-found resonances by the K-matrix method plus 3 experimental ones which could not be found due to their very narrow width. The bound states involved in these transitions comprise 150 energy levels belonging to 11 symmetries (J = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 half even and J = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 half odd). These include 142 theoretically found by R-matrix, which are all the bound states with effective quantum number between

0.1-13 for the outer electron and 0 ≤ l ≤ 5, plus 8 experimental top states which are the levels of the 1s22s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo and 4Do terms.

The theoretical and computational backgrounds for the atomic transition calculations including the emissivity thermodynamic model are given in Chapters2 and3. The calculations were performed using an elaborate C +2 ionic target under an intermediate coupling scheme. The list has also been validated by various tests including comparison to literature data related to autoionization and radiative transition probabilities and effective dielectronic recombination coefficients. The theoretical data of the bound and resonance states were also compared to the available experimental data [16] and found to agree very well both in energy levels and in fine structure splitting.

It should be remarked that processes other than dielectronic recombination have 4.1 Method 92 not been considered in the atomic scattering and transition model of SS1 list, so the results of SS1 are incomplete for states likely to be populated by radiative recombination or collisional excitation and de-excitation. Consequently, the results for free-free and free-bound transitions can be used directly to predict line intensities from low-density astrophysical plasmas such as gaseous nebulae but those between bound states underestimate the line intensities in general and hence can only be used as part of a larger ion population model including all relevant processes. Yes, there is an important exception for the bound-bound transitions that is when the upper level has a doubly-excited core and hence it occurs at the top of the cascade process where radiative contribution is minor. For these top-level transitions the contribution of processes other than dielectronic recombination is negligible and hence the theoretical data can be reliably used.

Therefore, with very few exceptions, only FF, FB, and BB with a doubly- excited upper state were used in the current study. The main exception about the bound-bound transitions with doubly-excited core is the λ4267 A˚ line which, being one of the strongest observed C ii recombination lines and hence is a major line in almost all observational data sets, cannot be avoided altogether. Therefore, recombination coeﬃcients in the form of case B from Davey et al [60], which are obtained within a more comprehensive theory that includes radiative contribution as well as dielectronic recombination, were used.

It should be remarked that the use in our analysis of the lines originating at the top of the cascade, which are excited in a very diﬀerent and much simpler way than lines like λ4267 A˚ at the bottom of a complex cascade process, makes our analysis more reliable as it relies on a much simpler and better-understood decay process. Our analysis may also provide a way, in some cases at least, for testing and validating the results obtained from the low-lying transitions such as those obtained from line λ4267. Hence agreement between electron temperatures obtained 4.1 Method 93 without λ4267 with those using λ4267, may provide a validation of recombination theory for line λ4267 and other low-lying transitions, as obtained previously by other researchers. For example, the possibility of the existence of some unknown mechanism that overpopulates the levels of the upper state of λ4267 transition causing the enhancement of the ORL abundance may be ruled out if the results with λ4267 are consistent with those obtained without λ4267. This is one reason why in section 4.2 we computed electron temperature from least squares minimization once with and once without line λ4267 when the selected observational data include this line.

With regard to the observational data, we carried out a fairly thorough research for C ii recombination line data in the literature in which over 140 data sets related mainly to planetary nebulae were collected and archived. However, most of these data sets were eliminated for various reasons such as the failure in the reliability tests, the poor quality of the data, and the consistence of only a single line and hence the data cannot be used in a least squares minimization procedure which requires two lines at least. More important is that almost all data sets that comprise only bound-bound transitions with no doubly-excited core upper state have been removed.

On eliminating most of the data sets on the previous grounds, the remaining data sets were subjected to a refinement process in which the flux of all the observational lines in each data set were normalized to the flux of a reference observational line in the set, which is usually chosen as the brightest and most reliable, while the emissivity of all the theoretical lines in the set were normalized to the emissivity of the corresponding theoretical line. The observational flux and theoretical emissivity of the reference line were therefore unity. The ratio of the normalized observed flux to the normalized theoretical emissivity of each line were then plotted on common graphs as a function of temperature on log-linear scales. A sample of these graphs 4.1 Method 94 is presented in Figure 4.5 for the planetary nebula NGC 5315. All lines that did not approach the ratio of the reference line within an arbitrarily-chosen factor of 3 were eliminated. Because the reference line was typically chosen as the brightest, and hence more reliable, any line whose normalized ratio deviates largely from the normalized ratio of this line should be deemed unreliable. The arbitrary factor of 3 was chosen as an appropriate limit considering practical factors that contribute to error in the collection of observational data. The refinement process also involved the utilization of graphs in which the ratio of theoretical emissivity to observational flux of all lines in a certain data set was plotted on a single graph as a function of electron temperature. A sample of these graphs are shown in Figures 4.2 and 4.11.

Some other lines were also eliminated for various reasons related mainly to an established or suspected misidentiﬁcation of the line or its intensity. For example, the wavelength of the alleged C ii line may not match with any known theoretical transition. Also, the absence of a strong line in the observational data associated with the presence of a much weaker line with no obvious reason, such as possible blending with a much stronger neighbor, casts doubt on the identiﬁcation of the present line. The line may also be eliminated because its intensity ratio relative to another well-established line does not comply with the ratio obtained from theory. Very few lines were also out of the wavelength range of our line list and hence were eliminated due to lack of theoretical emissivity data. Other reasons for elimination include lack of intensity data, blending or close proximity to other non-C ii lines.

The selected refined data sets were then subjected to a least squares optimization procedure which is outlined in the following section. It should be remarked that the observed flux used in the least squares procedure is the de-reddened flux obtained by correcting for extinction and other sources of error as stated by the data source and not the raw flux data. Therefore, there should be no ambiguity when we use ‘observed’ flux in the following sections. 4.1.1 Least Squares Minimization 95

4.1.1 Least Squares Minimization

The main method for generalizing and summarizing a set of data is by fitting it to a model that depends on adjustable parameters. A figure-of-merit function that measures the agreement between the data and the model for a particular choice of parameters is then chosen or designed so that small or large values indicate good agreement. The model parameters are then adjusted to achieve a minimum or maximum in the merit function, yielding best fit parameters. Least squares minimization is probably the most popular method in the physical sciences. It is widely used to determine the best set of parameters in a model to fit a set of observational data. The objective of the least squares technique is to minimize the difference between the observed data and the calculated model. The goodness-of-fit index χ2 is one of the most suggestive and commonly accepted figures of merit. It is widely used as an indicator of the overall fit between a theoretical model and a set of observational data. In general terms, it is given by [145]

P w (yo − yc)2 χ2 = i i i i (4.1) η

o c where yi and yi are the observed and calculated values at step i, wi is the corresponding weight, and η is the number of degrees of freedom given by η = O − P where O and P are the number of observations and ﬁtted parameters in the calculated model, respectively. The summation index i runs over all observed data points.

In our least squares calculations we have a single ﬁtting parameter, which is the electron temperature of the line-emitting regions in the astronomical objects (e.g.

NGC 5315 nebula), while the observations are the flux data of the C ii recombination lines that we obtained from the literature (e.g. observational data of Peimbert et al [10]). The purpose of the least squares procedure is to find the optimal tem- 4.1.1 Least Squares Minimization 96 perature that gives the best fit of the theoretical model to the observational data, and hence identifying the temperature of the line-emitting region in the astronomical object. However, since the collected spectrum is usually integrated over some spatial part of the nebula and along the line of sight through a three-dimensional object, the obtained temperature normally is an average value. In the following we outline the least squares procedure

• The theoretical lines are mapped to their observational counterparts where the resolution of the observational data is considered for this mapping when such data are available, i.e. all theoretical lines within that resolution on both sides of the observational line are added up and mapped to the observational line. This mapping scheme is justiﬁed by the fact that the lines within the resolution limits are blended and hence cannot be identiﬁed separately by observational means. The resolution of the observational data can be estimated from the graphs of spectra when these graphs are available. Information reported in the data source, as well as other contextual evidence, may also be used to determine the observational resolution.

• All blended C ii lines in the observational list are combined by considering them as a single line with a single ﬂux, while C ii lines blended with non-C ii lines are eliminated.

• To compare the theoretical emissivity to the observational flux, the theoretical emissivity of each line is normalized to the total theoretical emissivity of all the lines involved in the least squares procedure, while the observational flux of that line is normalized to the total observational flux of these lines.

• When using line λ4267 A,˚ the theoretical emissivity is obtained from Davey et al [60] in the form of case B eﬀective recombination coeﬃcients, and option ‘4’ of the ‘NormalizationChoice’ of the ‘Emissivity’ code is used, as explained 4.1.1 Least Squares Minimization 97

in AppendixC. The reason for this special treatment is that this important line, which is the most intense line of this ion in the visible part of the spectrum, comes from a BB transition, with no doubly-excited upper state, for which our emissivity model is not very accurate as it considers dielectronic contribution only.

• The normalized theoretical emissivities corresponding to a particular observational ﬂux are added up when multiple mapping occurs, that is when the observational ﬂux is given for a multiplet transition as a whole.

• The χ2 deﬁned by the following equation

N no nt 2 2 X (Ii − εi ) χ = 2 (4.2) ησ no i=1 Ii

is then computed, where i is an index running over all the N lines involved

no nt in the least squares procedure, Ii and εi are the normalized observational ﬂux and normalized theoretical emissivity of line i respectively, η is the num-

2 no ber of degrees of freedom, and σ no is the variance of I . This variance is Ii i computed from the formulae derived in AppendixB where for the data sets with given observational errors the reported errors were used in conjunction with formula B.6 while for the data sets with no reported error a Poisson distribution was assumed and hence Equation B.12 was used to estimate this variance. In some data sets, the observational error was given for some lines only, and hence the average of the given errors was assigned to the missing ones. In some cases when the reported error was unrealistically small result-

ing in large χ2, the χ2 curve was scaled to unity at the minimum to obtain a more realistic error estimate. This scaling does not aﬀect the temperature

at minimum χ2 but usually broadens the conﬁdence interval.

• The temperature of the object is then identiﬁed from its value at the min- 4.2 Astronomical Objects 98

imum χ2, while the conﬁdence interval is identiﬁed from the values of the

2 temperature corresponding to the values of χmin ± 1 on the lower and upper sides using linear interpolation. In some cases, the χ2 curve was too shallow on one side and hence it resulted in a broad conﬁdence interval on that side.

In the following section we present some astronomical objects that have been the subject of investigation in this study using the least squares minimization method.

4.2 Astronomical Objects

In this section we present a sample of the astronomical objects that have been investigated as part of the current study. The objects are mainly planetary nebulae and the physical parameter of interest is the electron temperature of the line emitting regions of the C ii dielectronic recombination and subsequent cascade decay.

A Planetary Nebula (PN) is an expanding cloud of gas and dust ejected from a dying star due to instabilities at the end of its life. The cloud is ionized by the highly energetic radiation from the stellar core (progenitor). The spectra of planetary nebulae, which originate from various physical processes such as collisional excitation and recombination, are very rich and span large parts of the electromagnetic spectrum with manifestation in both emission and absorption. These spectra involve many atomic and ionic species across the periodic table especially the light ones such as helium, carbon, and nitrogen. The nebular spectra also contain transition lines from some compound molecular species such as CO and CN. The normal temperature range in PNe is 103-2×104 K with a typical value of 104 K, while the normal electron density range is 109-1011 m−3 with a typical value of 1010 m−3. Figure 4.1 shows two prominent examples of planetary nebulae. The PNe are essential for astronomical and astrophysical studies because they are relatively 4.2.1 NGC 7009 99 abundant in the Milky Way galaxy and hence provide imperative case studies. In other galaxies, they may be used to acquire useful information about the chemical composition and the thermodynamic conditions. For cosmic processes, the PNe are very important objects because they participate in the process of heavy element enrichment of the astronomical objects and interstellar medium [3, 67, 146–148].

Figure 4.1: Two prominent planetary nebulae, NGC 7027 (left) and Cat’s eye (right) [from NASA].

4.2.1 NGC 7009

NGC 7009, also called Saturn nebula, is a bright planetary nebula in the Aquarius constellation. This nebula has a double-ringed complex spatial structure with a rich recombination spectrum related to some elements like oxygen; therefore it is expected to be an ideal environment for recombination processes in general [1, 63, 69, 149]. The observational data of this object were obtained from Fang and Liu [1] who collected very deep CCD spectrum of this object in a wavelength range of 3040-11000A.˚ Their observational line list comprises about 1200 emission lines where approximately 80% of these lines are identiﬁed as originating from permitted transitions. On surveying this list for C ii recombination lines we obtained about 64 lines attributed to C ii transitions. Following the reﬁnement process, outlined 4.2.1 NGC 7009 100 in § 4.1, this list was reduced to just 9 lines. These lines are presented in Table 4.1.

In this table, and other similar tables, λlab is the laboratory wavelength, and I is the flux (absolute or normalized to Hβ), while the other columns stand for the lower and upper terms, the lower and upper statistical weights, and transition type (free-free, free-bound and bound-bound) respectively. For the multiplet transitions, the wavelength is given for the first line while the statistical weights represent the sum of the individual weights. The prime in the term designation indicates an excited core, i.e. 1s22s2p(3Po). In Figure 4.2 the ratio of theoretical emissivity to observational flux is plotted against electron temperature on a linear-linear graph for the selected 9 lines. This graph, and other similar graphs for the other objects, were utilized to select the suitable lines.

−17 x 10

λ = 4267 V6 3d2D 16 <− 4f2F* 20 a λ = 4618 FF 3d’2F* 6 <− 4f’2G 8 a λ = 4619 FF 3d’2F* 8 <− 4f’2G 10 a 4.5 λ = 5133 BB 3s’4P* 2 <− 3p’4P 4 a λ = 5486 FB 3d’4D* 6 <− 4p’4D 6 a λ = 6781 BB 3s’4P* 2 <− 3p’4D 4 a λ = 6787 BB 3s’4P* 2 <− 3p’4D 2

) a 4 λ = 8794 FB 3p’2D 6 <− 3d’2F* 8 −1 a λ = 8800 FB 3p’2D 4 <− 3d’2F* 6 a

3.5

2.5

1.5

Theoretical Emissivity / Observational Flux (m 1

0.5

0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 4 Temperature (K) x 10 Figure 4.2: The ratio of theoretical emissivity to observational ﬂux as a function of temperature for the selected C ii lines of NGC 7009 spectra of Fang and Liu [1].

The observational data were normalized to the total observational ﬂux while the theoretical to the total theoretical emissivity, and χ2 was obtained and plotted against temperature over the range T = 500 − 10000 K in steps of 100 K. This 4.2.1 NGC 7009 101

Table 4.1: The observational C ii transition lines of Fang and Liu [1] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula NGC 7009. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux.

λlab I Lower Upper gl gu Type 4267.00 0.8795 3d 2De 4f 2Fo 16 20 BB 4618.40 0.0021 3d0 2Fo 4f0 2Ge 6 8 FF 4619.23 0.0021 3d0 2Fo 4f0 2Ge 8 10 FF 5132.94 0.0088 3s0 4Po 3p0 4Pe 2 4 BB 5485.90 0.0004 3d0 4Do 4p0 4De 6 6 FB 6780.61 0.0070 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 2 4 BB 6787.22 0.0052 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 2 2 BB 8793.80 0.0320 3p0 2De 3d0 2Fo 6 8 FB 8799.90 0.0224 3p0 2De 3d0 2Fo 4 6 FB

process was repeated: once with inclusion of line λ4267 and another with exclusion of this line. The reason for this was discussed in § 4.1. The χ2 graphs for these two cases are given in Figures 4.3 and 4.4. As seen, the ﬁrst indicates a temperature of about 5800 K while the second a temperature of about 5500 K, which are in good agreement.

In Table 4.2 we listed the electron temperature from diﬀerent types of transitions related to various ions as obtained from the cited literature following a non-thorough research. As can be seen, the values that we obtained from our least squares method is in a broad agreement with the temperature obtained from several recombination lines. The lower electron temperature from optical recombination lines (ORL) compared to the values obtained from collisionally-excited lines (CEL) is consistent with the trend of the previous ﬁndings related to the long-standing problem of discrepancy between the abundance and temperature results of ORL and CEL (higher ORL abundance and lower electron temperature as compared to the CEL abundance and temperature), as outlined in § 1.3. In this table, and other similar ones, some types of transitions (e.g. C ii) have been assigned more than one 4.2.1 NGC 7009 102

Temperature at χ2 = 5800 K, Confidence interval: 4961−6318 K min 5

4.5

3.5

3 2

χ 2.5

1.5

0.5

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Temperature (K)

Figure 4.3: Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 7009 with the inclusion of line 2 λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown.

Temperature at χ2 = 5500 K, Confidence interval: 4697−6156 K min 4

3.5

2.5 2

χ 2

1.5

0.5

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Temperature (K)

Figure 4.4: Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 7009 with the exclusion of line 2 λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown. 4.2.1 NGC 7009 103 temperature value in the same cited reference; the reason normally is that more than one value has been obtained for that transition type using different spectral lines. These tables may also contain non-first hand data, as the purpose is to give a general idea about the values in the literature not to meticulously document the results obtained from previous works. There may also be some repetitive values as they are obtained from the same first hand source but reported in different litera- tures. It should be remarked that no error estimate is given in these tables due to the limited column space; the cited data sources should be consulted to obtain this information. Another remark is that we followed the apparent identification and labeling of the authors without meticulous verification of the lines and the type of transition they belong to. Since some authors use relaxed notation for ORL and CEL lines there may be some cases of inaccurate labeling of these lines. For more reliable verification our data sources, as cited in these tables, should be consulted to establish the origin of these lines. 4.2.1 NGC 7009 104

Table 4.2: The electron temperature in Kelvin of NGC 7009 from diﬀerent atoms, ions and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BJ stands for Balmer Jump and PJ for Paschen Jump. CW refers to the current work. For reference [9] we followed the apparent labeling of the authors although the temperatures may have been derived from CEL lines.

Source [9] [150] [57] [149] [61] [151] [152] [153] [90] CW H i(BJ) 8150 7200 7200 7200 H i(PJ) 5800 He i 5380 5040 8000 6800 5040 C ii 5800 5500 C iii] 8160 8350 N ii 10800 [N ii] 11040 O ii 1600 O iii 9600 8900 O iii] 9570 8730 10340 9870 [O iii] 9910 10380 9980 9980 9980 10000 9420 8350 9740 9930 Mean 7419 10340 4.2.2 NGC 5315 105

4.2.2 NGC 5315

NGC 5315 is a young dense planetary nebula in the southern constellation Circinus located at a distance of about 2.6 kpc with an interesting complex ﬂower shape appearance [10, 154]. The observational data of this object were obtained from

Peimbert et al [10]. On inspecting this data source for C ii recombination lines we obtained about 25 lines attributed to C ii transitions. Following the refinement process, outlined in § 4.1, this list was reduced to just 4 lines. These lines are presented in Table 4.3. Figure 4.5 displays the ratio of the normalized observed flux to the normalized theoretical emissivity versus electron temperature for the selected 4 lines of NGC 5315 data. This graph, with similar graphs for the other objects were used in the refinement process to include and exclude lines from the original list into the final one, as explained in § 4.1.

4 10 λ = 4267.15 3d2D 16 <− 4f2F* 20 a λ = 5145.16 3s’4P* 6 <− 3p’4P 6 a λ = 6791.47 3s’4P* 4 <− 3p’4D 4 a λ = 6800.68 3s’4P* 6 <− 3p’4D 6 a

3 10

2 10 NFER

1 10

0 10

−1 10 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 4 Temperature(K) x 10 Figure 4.5: Ratio of normalized observed ﬂux to normalized theoretical emissivity (NFER) versus temperature on log-linear scales for the planetary nebula NGC 5315. 4.2.2 NGC 5315 106

Table 4.3: The observational C ii transition lines of Peimbert et al [10] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula NGC 5315. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux.

λlab I Lower Upper gl gu Type 4267.00 0.6559 3d 2De 4f 2Fo 16 20 BB 5145.16 0.0039 3s0 4Po 3p0 4Pe 6 6 BB 6791.47 0.0068 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 4 4 BB 6800.68 0.0028 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 6 6 BB

The data were normalized to the total flux and emissivity, as outlined earlier, and χ2 was computed and plotted against temperature over the range T = 500 − 20000 K in steps of 100 K. This process was performed with and without line λ4267, as for NGC 7009. The χ2 graphs for these two cases are given in Figures 4.6 and 4.7. As seen, the first minimizes at T ' 7400 K while the second at T ' 6500 K. The shape of these curves may indicate that the first value is more reliable. Table 4.4 presents some values of the electron temperature of NGC 5315 as reported in the cited literature. Our value of 7400 K compares very well with some of these values. Again, the temperature is lower than that derived from the collisionally-excited lines. 4.2.2 NGC 5315 107

Temperature at χ2 = 7400 K, Confidence interval: 6452−8243 K min 10

6 2

χ 5

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 4 Temperature (K) x 10

Figure 4.6: Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 5315 with the inclusion of line 2 λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown.

Temperature at χ2 = 6500 K, Confidence interval: 2788−15738 K min 2

1.8

1.6

1.4

1.2 2

χ 1

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 4 Temperature (K) x 10

Figure 4.7: Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 5315 with the exclusion of line 2 λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown. 4.2.2 NGC 5315 108

Table 4.4: The electron temperature in Kelvin of NGC 5315 from diﬀerent atoms, ions and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BJ stands for Balmer Jump. CW refers to the current work.

Source [150] [57] [149] [88] [89] [10] CW H i(BJ) 8600 8600 H ii 7500 He i 10000 C ii 7400 6500 N ii 9600 [N ii] 9090 10800 O i 7730 O ii 8100 5750 4350 O iii 8850 O iii] 10040 [O iii] 8150 10330 9000 9000 18500 7800 Ne iii 10700 S ii 9000 S iii 9150 [S ii] 11400 Cl iii 10500 Cl iv 11200 Ar iii 8300 Mean 7873 4.2.3 NGC 7027 109

4.2.3 NGC 7027

NGC 7027 is a compact, bright, young, high excitation planetary nebula with one of the hottest central stars known for a PN. Among the observed planetary nebulae, it has one of the richest lines emission which spans most parts of the electromagnetic spectrum and has been a challenge for observers as well as theorists. NGC 7027 is located about 0.9 kpc from the sun in the direction of the constellation Cygnus in the Milky Way. There is evidence on the existence of substantial quantities of heavy elements dust alongside the neutral and ionized nebular gas. Thanks to its luminosity and compactness, it can be easily observed despite the considerable extinction caused by interior and interstellar dust. It has been a reference object and the subject of several spectral surveys, and probably it is the best studied PN. There are several indications that the progenitor of NGC 7027 is a carbon-rich star [3, 67, 155].

Two observational data sets related to NGC 7027 were investigated: one obtained from Baluteau et al [2], and the other obtained from Zhang et al [3].

4.2.3.1 Baluteau et al

On surveying Baluteau et al [2] for C ii recombination lines we obtained about 30 lines attributed to C ii transitions. Following the reﬁnement process, outlined in § 4.1, this list was reduced to just 8 lines. These lines are presented in Table 4.5.

Standard normalization process to the total ﬂux and emissivity was carried out, and a χ2 plot as a function of temperature over the range T = 500 − 20000 K

2 in steps of 100 K was obtained. As seen in Figure 4.8, the χmin occurs at a temperature of about 11100 K, in good agreement with values obtained by other researchers using diﬀeren methods and various transitions from diﬀerent atoms and ions; a sample of which is presented in Table 4.6. There are other estimates for 4.2.3.2 Zhang et al 110

Table 4.5: The observational C ii transition lines of Baluteau et al [2] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula NGC 7027. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux.

λlab I Lower Upper gl gu Type 6779.93 11.8 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 4 6 BB 6783.91 2.1 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 6 8 BB 6787.22 3.7 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 2 2 BB 6791.47 4.9 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 4 4 BB 6798.10 0.7 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 4 2 BB 6812.28 0.5 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 6 4 BB 7112.48 4.7 3p0 4De 3d0 4Fo 6 10 BB 8793.80 11.8 3p0 2De 3d0 2Fo 6 8 FB

the electron temperature of the line emitting regions of NGC 7027 deduced from diﬀerent methods, and they generally represent average values. For example, van Hoof et al [156] reported average electron temperatures in various line emitting regions of NGC 7027 obtained from a number of ions using their photoionization model; these temperatures range between T = 10450 − 17990 K with an average value of about 14100 K. This is very close to the value derived by Aller and Keyes [67] and Zhang et al [3] of about 14000 K.

4.2.3.2 Zhang et al

The observational data of this object were obtained from Zhang et al [3]. On surveying the observational list for C ii recombination lines we obtained about 67 lines attributed to C ii transitions. Following the reﬁnement process, outlined in § 4.1, this list was reduced to just 20 lines. These lines are presented in Table 4.7.

The data were normalized to the total ﬂux and emissivity with and without line

λ4267, as outlined earlier, and χ2 was calculated and plotted against temperature over the range T = 500 − 30000 K in steps of 100 K. As seen in Figures 4.9 4.2.3.2 Zhang et al 111

Temperature at χ2 = 11100 K, Confidence interval: 9928−12658 K min 10

6 2

χ 5

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 4 Temperature (K) x 10

Figure 4.8: Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 7027 of Baluteau et al [2]. The 2 temperature at χmin and the confidence interval are shown. and 4.10, the first minimizes at T ' 12500 K and the second at T ' 12000 K, which reasonably agree with some of the values reported in the literature as seen in Table 4.6. However, the confidence interval in both cases poorly constrains the temperature estimate limits especially on the upper end. It should be remarked that since no observational error estimate was given for these lines, an error estimate based on Poisson statistical distribution was used in the least squares procedure, as given by Equation B.12 in AppendixB. 4.2.3.2 Zhang et al 112

Table 4.6: The electron temperature in Kelvin for NGC 7027 derived from diﬀerent atoms, ions and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BJ stands for Balmer Jump and PJ for Paschen Jump. CW refers to the current work where the ﬁrst value was obtained from Baluteau et al data while the other two are obtained from Zhang et al data.

Source [150] [57] [149] [61] [151] [98] [153] [100] CW H i(BJ) 12800 12000 12000 8000 H i(PJ) 8000 8000 He i 9260 10000 8200 10360 C ii 11100 12500 12000 C iii] 12290 [N i] 15000 [N ii] 12300 O ii 7100 [O i] 11300 O iii] 13300 [O iii] 9260 14850 12600 14130 13000 [Cl iv] 13700 [Ar iii] 12900 [Ar iv] 13600 Mean 11505 11124 4.2.3.2 Zhang et al 113

Temperature at χ2 = 12500 K, Confidence interval: 8725−18713 K min 5

4.5

3.5

3 2

χ 2.5

1.5

0.5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 4 Temperature (K) x 10

Figure 4.9: Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 7027 of Zhang et al [3] with 2 the inclusion of line λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown.

Temperature at χ2 = 12000 K, Confidence interval: 8448−27637 K min 5

4.5

3.5

3 2

χ 2.5

1.5

0.5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 4 Temperature (K) x 10

Figure 4.10: Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 7027 of Zhang et al [3] with 2 the exclusion of line λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown. 4.2.3.2 Zhang et al 114

Table 4.7: The observational C ii transition lines of Zhang et al [3] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula NGC 7027. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux.

λlab I Lower Upper gl gu Type 3588.92 0.018 3p0 4De 4s0 4Po 2 2 FB 3590.86 0.059 3p0 4De 4s0 4Po 10 6 FB 3876.66 0.026 3d0 4Fo 4f0 4Ge 6 8 FB 4267.00 0.575 3d 2De 4f 2Fo 16 20 BB 4323.11 0.004 3p0 4Pe 4s0 4Po 2 2 FB 4372.35 0.026 3d0 4Po 4f0 4De 4 4 FF 4376.56 0.031 3d0 4Po 4f0 4De 4 6 FF 4411.16 0.019 3d0 2Do 4f0 2Fe 4 6 FF 4618.40 0.009 3d0 2Fo 4f0 2Ge 6 8 FF 5133.28 0.013 3s0 4Po 3p0 4Pe 4 6 BB 5143.38 0.013 3s0 4Po 3p0 4Pe 4 2 BB 5151.09 0.009 3s0 4Po 3p0 4Pe 6 4 BB 5259.06 0.009 3d0 4Fo 4p0 4De 8 6 FB 6779.93 0.034 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 4 6 BB 6783.90 0.004 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 6 8 BB 6787.22 0.008 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 2 2 BB 6791.47 0.012 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 4 4 BB 6800.68 0.009 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 6 6 BB 6812.29 0.001 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 6 4 BB 8793.80 0.015 3p0 2De 3d0 2Fo 6 8 FB 4.2.4 IC 418 115

4.2.4 IC 418

IC 418, or Spirograph Nebula, is a bright, young, C-enhanced, low-excitation, highly symmetric, elliptically-shaped planetary nebula with apparent ring structure located at a distance of about 0.6 kpc in the constellation Lepus [52, 54, 64, 140, 157–161]. Due to its brightness and exceptional features, the nebula was, and is still, the subject of many theoretical and observational studies in the last decades. The observational data about IC 418 which we used in the current study come from Sharpee et al [4]. On surveying this source of data for C ii recombination lines we obtained about 93 lines attributed to C ii transitions. Following the reﬁnement process, outlined in § 4.1, this list was reduced to just 23 lines. These lines are presented in Table 4.8. In Figure 4.11 the ratio of theoretical emissivity to observational ﬂux is plotted against electron temperature on a linear-linear graph for the selected 23 lines. This graph, and other similar graphs for the other objects, were used to select the suitable lines.

−16 x 10 2.5 λ = 3591 FB 3p’4D 10 <− 4s’4P* 6 a λ = 3876 FB 3d’4F* 24 <− 4f’4G 30 a λ = 3977 FB 3d’4D* 6 <− 4f’4D 6 a λ = 4267 BB 3d2D 16 <− 4f2F* 20 a λ = 4319 FB 3p’4P 2 <− 4s’4P* 4 a λ = 4377 FF 3d’4P* 4 <− 4f’4D 6 a λ = 4411 FF 3d’2D* 4 <− 4f’2F 6

) a 2 λ = 4965 FB 3p’2P 4 <− 3d’2P* 4 −1 a λ = 5133 BB 3s’4P* 6 <− 3p’4P 10 a λ = 5145 BB 3s’4P* 6 <− 3p’4P 6 a λ = 5151 BB 3s’4P* 6 <− 3p’4P 4 a λ = 5259 FB 3d’4F* 8 <− 4p’4D 6 a λ = 5260 FB 3d’4F* 10 <− 4p’4D 6 a λ = 5648 BB 3s’4P* 4 <− 3p’4S 4 a λ = 6099 FB 3p’2P 4 <− 3d’2D* 6 1.5 a λ = 6251 FF 3d’2D* 6 <− 4p’2P 4 a λ = 6780 BB 3s’4P* 4 <− 3p’4D 6 a λ = 6781 BB 3s’4P* 2 <− 3p’4D 4 a λ = 6784 BB 3s’4P* 6 <− 3p’4D 8 a λ = 6791 BB 3s’4P* 4 <− 3p’4D 4 a λ = 6801 BB 3s’4P* 6 <− 3p’4D 6 a λ = 7113 BB 3p’4D 4 <− 3d’4F* 6 a λ = 7116 BB 3p’4D 6 <− 3d’4F* 8 1 a

Theoretical Emissivity / Observational Flux (m 0.5

0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 4 Temperature (K) x 10 Figure 4.11: The ratio of theoretical emissivity to observational ﬂux as a function of temperature for the selected C ii lines of IC 418 spectra of Sharpee et al [4]. 4.2.4 IC 418 116

Table 4.8: The observational C ii transition lines of Sharpee et al [4] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula IC 418. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux.

λlab I Lower Upper gl gu Type 3590.757 0.0252 3p0 4De 4s0 4Po 10 6 FB 3876.392 0.0069 3d0 4Fo 4f0 4Ge 24 30 FB 3977.250 0.0026 3d0 4Do 4f0 4De 6 6 FB 4267.001 0.5712 3d 2De 4f 2Fo 16 20 BB 4318.606 0.0086 3p0 4Pe 4s0 4Po 2 4 FB 4376.582 0.0016 3d0 4Po 4f0 4De 4 6 FF 4411.152 0.0016 3d0 2Do 4f0 2Fe 4 6 FF 4964.736 0.0211 3p0 2Pe 3d0 2Po 4 4 FB 5132.947 0.0044 3s0 4Po 3p0 4Pe 6 10 BB 5145.165 0.0040 3s0 4Po 3p0 4Pe 6 6 BB 5151.085 0.0046 3s0 4Po 3p0 4Pe 6 4 BB 5259.055 0.0031 3d0 4Fo 4p0 4De 8 6 FB 5259.664 0.0032 3d0 4Fo 4p0 4De 10 6 FB 5648.070 0.0014 3s0 4Po 3p0 4Se 4 4 BB 6098.510 0.0011 3p0 2Pe 3d0 2Do 4 6 FB 6250.760 0.0015 3d0 2Do 4p0 2Pe 6 4 FF 6779.940 0.0109 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 4 6 BB 6780.600 0.0055 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 2 4 BB 6783.910 0.0022 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 6 8 BB 6791.470 0.0066 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 4 4 BB 6800.680 0.0050 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 6 6 BB 7113.040 0.0052 3p0 4De 3d0 4Fo 4 6 BB 7115.630 0.0043 3p0 4De 3d0 4Fo 6 8 BB

The data, with and without λ4267, were normalized to the total flux and emissivity and χ2 was obtained and plotted against temperature over the range T = 500 − 20000 K in steps of 100 K. As seen in Figures 4.12 and 4.13, the first minimizes at T ' 8700 K while the second at T ' 7700 K. The electron temperature data reported in the literature, a sample of which is presented in Table 4.9, suffer from erratic scattering and hence no average broad value can be safely concluded. One possibility for this scattering, in addition to the differences arising from using different methods as well as different atoms, ions and transitions, is the 4.2.4 IC 418 117 type of spectral data and the range to which they belong as they originate from different parts in the nebula. For example, using the visible part originating in one part of the nebula should produce a temperature different to that obtained from radio frequency or far-infrared originating from another part. It should be remarked that Sharpee et al [4] give the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio instead of giving observational error; therefore the error (i.e. standard deviation) on flux was computed as the product of the line flux times the reciprocal of S/N ratio.

Temperature at χ2 = 8700 K, Confidence interval: 8242−9182 K min 100

60 2

χ 50

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 4 Temperature (K) x 10

Figure 4.12: Temperature dependence of χ2 for IC 418 with the inclusion of line 2 λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown. 4.2.4 IC 418 118

Temperature at χ2 = 7700 K, Confidence interval: 6251−10071 K min 5

4.5

3.5

3 2

χ 2.5

1.5

0.5

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 4 Temperature (K) x 10

Figure 4.13: Temperature dependence of χ2 for IC 418 with the exclusion of line 2 λ4267. The temperature at χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown. 4.2.4 IC 418 119

Table 4.9: The electron temperature in Kelvin of IC 418 from diﬀerent atoms, ions and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BD stands for Balmer Discontinuity and RF for Radio Frequency. CW refers to the current work.

Source [157] [162] [163] [164] [165] [52] [140] [160] [150] [161] [64] CW H i(BD) >15000 He i 9800 9800 C ii 9600 8700 7700 C iii 9800 C iii] 8700 N i 8500 N ii 9600 [N ii] 8300 8200 8510 9400 8200 [N iii] 8500 O i 8500 O ii 9600 O iii 9800 [O ii] 8200 [O iii] 7000 11200 9100 9800 9360 9100 10300 9500 9400 9600 Ne ii 8500 Ne iii 9800 [Ne iii] 8000 Mg ii 8500 S ii 8500 8500 S iii 9800 [S iii] 9500 9200 Cl ii 8500 Cl iii 9800 Ar ii 8500 Ar iii 9800 9800 [Ar iii] 9100 RF 12500 6600 23000 7100 Mean 20000 10000 4.2.5 NGC 2867 120

4.2.5 NGC 2867

NGC 2867, or Caldwell 90, is a compact planetary nebula with comparatively small size and fairly strong surface brightness located at a distance of about 0.5 kpc in the southern constellation Carina. It has a rather warm (∼ 145000 K) Wolf-Rayet central star of WC6 or early WO type with evidence of being relatively rich in nitrogen. The rich spectrum of this nebula and its star has been the subject of investigation for many studies in the last few decades with some emphasis on the optical and ultraviolet transitions [11, 166–168].

The observational data of this object were obtained from Garc´ıa-Rojas et al [11] where two knots have been studied: one labeled NGC 2867-1 and the other NGC

2867-2. On surveying this data source for C ii recombination lines we obtained about 8 lines attributed to C ii transitions. Following the refinement process, outlined in § 4.1, this list was reduced to just 2 lines. These lines are presented in Table 4.10 where the first value of I belongs to the first knot while the second (inside the brackets) belongs to the second.

Table 4.10: The observational C ii transition lines of Garc´ıa-Rojas et al [11] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula NGC 2867. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux. The first I value belongs to knot 1 and the second to knot 2.

λlab I Lower Upper gl gu Type 4267.15 0.814(1.246) 3d 2De 4f 2Fo 16 20 BB 6779.93 0.045(0.079) 3s0 4Po 3p0 4De 4 6 BB

These data sets were normalized to the total flux and emissivity and χ2 was obtained and plotted against temperature in the range T = 500 − 30000 K with a step size of 100 K. These plots are presented in Figures 4.14 and 4.15. As seen, NGC 2867-1 graph indicates a temperature of about 14300 K while NGC 2867-2 4.2.5 NGC 2867 121 graph a temperature of about 16000 K. The difference in temperature value may be caused by the difference in the physical conditions of the two knots. Table 4.11 presents electron temperatures derived in previous works from transitions of different species. As seen, our values are significantly higher than most of the values reported in the literature. However, this may be explained by the complex structure of this nebula and the possibility of different lines being originating from different regions with very different physical conditions.

Temperature at χ2 = 14300 K, Confidence interval: 12116−17598 K min 1.5

1 2 χ

0.5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 4 Temperature (K) x 10

Figure 4.14: Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 2867-1. The temperature at 2 χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown. 4.2.5 NGC 2867 122

Temperature at χ2 = 16000 K, Confidence interval: 13085−26562 K min 0.4

0.35

0.3

0.25 2

χ 0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 4 Temperature (K) x 10

Figure 4.15: Temperature dependence of χ2 for NGC 2867-2. The temperature at 2 χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown.

Table 4.11: The electron temperature in Kelvin of NGC 2867 from diﬀerent species and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BD stands for Balmer Decrement and K1 and K2 for knot 1 and knot 2. CW refers to the current work where the ﬁrst value is related to knot 1 and the second to knot 2.

Source [166] [150] [57] [149] [11] K1 [11] K2 CW H i(BD) 8950 8950 He i 10900 10250 C ii 14300 16000 C iii] 10750 [N ii] 8800 9000 11750 11750 O iii] 10580 [O iii] 11100 10520 11340 11850 11600 [S ii] 8450 8250 [Ar iii] 10800 11350 [Ar iv] 15400 >19870 [N ii]+[O iii] 11850 11600 Mean 10592 4.2.6 DQ Herculis 1934 123

4.2.6 DQ Herculis 1934

This is a peculiar old classical galactic nova originating from an accreting cat- aclysmic variable binary system which apparently consists of a white and a red dwarfs. It is located in the Hercules constellation at an estimated distance of about 0.2-0.4 kpc. DQ Her is characterized by its 71 s periodically pulsating spectrum which occurs mainly in the visible, ultraviolet and X-ray regions. The strange features of this nova include a very low electron temperature and an enhanced CNO abundance. The former seems to correlate to the latter since low electron temperatures usually characterize metal rich nebulae. Thanks to its reasonable brightness, pulsation, and peculiar properties, it is one of the most observed and best studied novae [12, 68, 169–175].

The observational data of DQ Her which we used in the current study were obtained from Ferland et al [12]. On surveying the data source for C ii recombination lines we obtained 2 lines attributed to C ii transitions. These lines are presented in Table 4.12. The observational and theoretical data were then normalized to the total ﬂux and emissivity respectively and χ2 was obtained and plotted against temperature in the range T = 500 − 5000 K with a step size of 100 K. The χ2 plot is shown in Figure 4.16. As seen in this ﬁgure the deduced electron temperature is about 1600 K.

It should be remarked that the use of λ1335 A˚ line is a second exception (the ﬁrst is λ4267 A)˚ to our rule of using the BB transitions only if the upper state has a doubly-excited core. The justiﬁcation of this exception is that the upper state of the λ1335 transition is 1s22s2p2 which is connected to the C2+ 1s22s2 continuum and 1s22s2nl Rydberg states by two-electron radiative processes which are usually very weak. Another remark is that since no observational error estimate was given for these lines, an error estimate based on Poisson statistical distribution was used 4.2.6 DQ Herculis 1934 124 in the least squares procedure, as given by Equation B.12 in AppendixB.

Temperature at χ2 = 1600 K, Confidence interval: 1463−1736 K min 15

10 2 χ

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Temperature (K)

Figure 4.16: Temperature dependence of χ2 for DQ Herculis 1934. The temperature 2 at χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown.

Table 4.13 presents some of the electron temperature values for DQ Her collected from the literature. Our value of 1600 K reasonably agrees with the values of Smits

[176] and Davey [13] which are also derived from C ii recombination lines but with different method using the flux ratio of λ1335 to λ4267. Itoh [173] seems to conclude different temperature values derived from various species and may originate from different parts of DQ Her; some of these values are lower than 500 K while some are much higher and may even reach 20000 K or higher although some of these derived values are based on tentative models. The higher temperatures may also belong to the hot inner disk region, rather than the cool outer nebula shell, where much higher temperatures have been derived for the disk [177–179]. 4.2.6 DQ Herculis 1934 125

Table 4.12: The observational C ii transition lines of Ferland et al [12] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in DQ Herculis 1934. The given flux is the normalized to the Hβ flux.

λlab I Lower Upper gl gu Type 1335 270 2p 2Po 2s2p2 2De 10 14 BB 4267 29 3d 2De 4f 2Fo 16 20 BB

Table 4.13: The electron temperature in Kelvin of DQ Herculis 1934 from diﬀerent species and transitions as obtained from the cited literature, where BC stands for Balmer Continuum. CW refers to the current work.

Source [180] [181] [12] [68] [176] [13] CW H i(BC) 500 1000 450 C ii 700 1300 1450 1600 [N ii] 2500 2400 Mean 500 4.2.7 CPD - 56◦8032 126

4.2.7 CPD - 56◦8032

CPD - 56◦8032 is a cool late-type Wolf-Rayet star that is usually classiﬁed as WC10 or WC11. The star, which is located at about 1.3-1.5 kpc, is surrounded by a young planetary nebula with complex visible structure. The low-excitation spectrum of

CPD - 56◦8032, which has been described as unique, shows bright C ii and C iii emission lines indicating the star is carbon-rich. Observational studies suggest that the star is encircled by a disk or torus of dust [182–192].

Here, we try to infer the electron temperature of the stellar nebular wind surrounding CPD - 56◦8032. The observational data of this object were obtained from

De Marco et al [5]. On surveying this data source we obtained about 16 C ii lines. Following the reﬁnement process, outlined in § 4.1, this list was reduced to 13 lines. These lines are presented in Table 4.14.

The data were normalized to the total ﬂux and emissivity and χ2 was computed and plotted against temperature over the range T = 500 − 30000 K in steps of 100 K. As seen in Figure 4.17, the plot indicates a temperature of about 17300 K. This agrees, within the reported error bars, with the temperature of De Marco et al [193, 194] who deduced a value of 18500±1500 K for this object using a similar least squares approach. Table 4.15 presents electron temperatures derived previously in the cited literature. As seen there is a large scattering in the reported values. The main reason for this may be the large temperature variations across the line emitting regions, where the high temperature lines originate from the inner ring next to the central star while the low temperature lines come from the relatively cold region at the perimeter of the nebula. Diﬀerences in the derivation methods and the type of transitions used in these derivations (e.g. CEL versus ORL), as well as observational and theoretical errors, should also contribute to the scattering. However, our value agrees reasonably with some of these reported values. 4.2.7 CPD - 56◦8032 127

Table 4.14: The observational C ii transition lines of De Marco et al [5] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to ﬁnd the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula CPD - 56◦8032. The given ﬂux is the absolute value in units of erg.s−1.cm−2.

λlab I Lower Upper gl gu Type 4618.73 4.194E-12 3d0 2Fo 4f0 2Ge 6 8 FF 4619.23 6.167E-12 3d0 2Fo 4f0 2Ge 8 10 FF 4627.63 1.850E-13 3d0 2Fo 4f0 2Ge 8 8 FF 4953.85 1.437E-12 3p0 2Pe 3d0 2Po 2 2 FB 4958.67 7.183E-13 3p0 2Pe 3d0 2Po 4 2 FB 4959.92 7.183E-13 3p0 2Pe 3d0 2Po 2 4 FB 4964.73 3.592E-12 3p0 2Pe 3d0 2Po 4 4 FB 5107.97 5.906E-13 3d0 2Po 4f0 2De 4 4 FF 5113.69 3.384E-12 3d0 2Po 4f0 2De 4 6 FF 5114.26 2.888E-12 3d0 2Po 4f0 2De 2 4 FF 8793.80 1.926E-12 3p0 2De 3d0 2Fo 6 8 FB 8799.90 1.347E-12 3p0 2De 3d0 2Fo 4 6 FB 8826.98 9.426E-14 3p0 2De 3d0 2Fo 6 6 FB

Temperature at χ2 = 17300 K, Confidence interval: 14022−23677 K min 4

3.5

2.5 2

χ 2

1.5

0.5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 4 Temperature (K) x 10

Figure 4.17: Temperature dependence of χ2 for CPD - 56◦8032. The temperature 2 at χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown. 4.2.7 CPD - 56◦8032 128

Table 4.15: The electron temperature in Kelvin of the stellar wind of the CPD - 56◦8032 Wolf-Rayet star from diﬀerent species and transitions as obtained from the cited literature. CW refers to the current work. Also Davey [13] seems to support the value of 12800 K derived by Barlow and Storey [14].

Source [184] [195] [196] [14] [197] [186] [193, 194] [5] [198] CW He i 20100 He ii 20800 C ii 12800 20000 18500 21300 21300 17300 18900 21000 21700 [N ii] 11000 General 10000 7000 4.2.8 He 2-113 129

4.2.8 He 2-113

He 2-113 is a late-type WC10 Wolf-Rayet star surrounded by a planetary nebula with an apparent ring structure. There are many physical similarities between CPD - 56◦8032 and He 2-113 such as age, ﬂux and distance. These similarities are reﬂected in the strong resemblance of their observed spectra and hence they are normally investigated jointly [5, 191–193, 199–202].

Here, we investigate the electron temperature of the stellar wind surrounding He 2-113 using observational data from De Marco et al [5]. On surveying this data source we obtained about 16 C ii recombination lines. Following the reﬁnement process, outlined in § 4.1, this list was reduced to 13 lines. These lines are presented in Table 4.16.

Table 4.16: The observational C ii transition lines of De Marco et al [5] that were used in the least squares minimization procedure to ﬁnd the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the planetary nebula He 2-113. The given ﬂux is the absolute value in units of erg.s−1.cm−2.

λlab I Lower Upper gl gu Type 4618.73 2.271E-12 3d0 2Fo 4f0 2Ge 6 8 FF 4619.23 3.339E-12 3d0 2Fo 4f0 2Ge 8 10 FF 4627.63 1.002E-13 3d0 2Fo 4f0 2Ge 8 8 FF 4953.85 7.141E-13 3p0 2Pe 3d0 2Po 2 2 FB 4958.67 3.571E-13 3p0 2Pe 3d0 2Po 4 2 FB 4959.92 3.571E-13 3p0 2Pe 3d0 2Po 2 4 FB 4964.73 1.785E-12 3p0 2Pe 3d0 2Po 4 4 FB 5107.97 1.973E-13 3d0 2Po 4f0 2De 4 4 FF 5113.69 1.130E-12 3d0 2Po 4f0 2De 4 6 FF 5114.26 9.646E-13 3d0 2Po 4f0 2De 2 4 FF 8793.80 9.342E-13 3p0 2De 3d0 2Fo 6 8 FB 8799.90 6.533E-13 3p0 2De 3d0 2Fo 4 6 FB 8826.98 4.573E-14 3p0 2De 3d0 2Fo 6 6 FB

The data were normalized to the total ﬂux and emissivity, as outlined previously, and χ2 was computed and plotted against temperature over the range T = 500 − 4.2.8 He 2-113 130

30000 K in steps of 100 K. As seen in Figure 4.18, the plot indicates a temperature of about 16200 K which agrees very well with some previously-deduced values notably those of De Marco et al [5, 198]. Table 4.17 presents electron temperatures derived previously in the cited literature. As seen there is some scattering in these values. Similar arguments to those presented in the CPD - 56◦8032 section may be given to explain this scattering in the derived electron temperatures.

Table 4.17: The electron temperature in Kelvin of the stellar wind of the He 2-113 Wolf-Rayet star as obtained from the cited literature. CW refers to the current work.

Source [195] [193, 194] [5] [198] CW C ii 13600 16400 16400 16200 17000 General 8800 4.2.8 He 2-113 131

Temperature at χ2 = 16200 K, Confidence interval: 13630−20740 K min 5

4.5

3.5

3 2

χ 2.5

1.5

0.5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 4 Temperature (K) x 10

2 2 Figure 4.18: Temperature dependence of χ for He 2-113. The temperature at χmin and the conﬁdence interval are shown. 4.3 Electron Distribution 132

4.3 Electron Distribution

As discussed in 1.3, it has been suggested [109] that the discrepancy between the results of ORLs and those of CELs is based on the assumption of a Maxwell- Boltzmann (MB) for the electron distribution in the nebulae. Therefore by assuming a different type of distribution, e.g. κ-distribution, the ORLs and CELs should yield very similar results for the abundance and electron temperature. One way for testing this proposal is to obtain the electron distribution from the transition lines obtained from the spectra of nebulae and compare to the MB and other distributions. Since we have sufficient theoretical data for the C ii dielectronic recombination with some observational data, we decided to put this proposal to test. To obtain the electron distribution from the observed spectra, the observed flux in conjunction with theoretical data such as recombination coefficient, are used as outlined in the following for the cases in which the transition originates from an autoionizing upper state.

The dielectronic recombination coeﬃcient, α(λ), is related to the fraction of electrons per unit energy, f, in the energy range to + d by the following relation 1/2 3 ωr R r α(λ) = 2πa0 R Γ bf (4.3) ω+ where a0 is the Bohr radius, ωr is the statistical weight of resonance, ω+ is the statistical weight of the recombined ion, R is the Rydberg constant, Γr is the radiative probability of the transition, and b is the departure coeﬃcient of the autoionizing state. Now MB distribution is given by

r 2 − fMB = e kT (4.4) (kT )3/2 π where k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the electron temperature. Because 4.3 Electron Distribution 133 there is a proportionality between the de-reddened ﬂux, I, and the dielectronic

hc recombination coeﬃcient multiplied by the photon energy, λ , we can write

α = CIλ (4.5) where C is a proportionality factor. On substituting α from Equation 4.5 into Equation 4.3 and solving for f we obtain

1/2 ω+ λ f = DI r (4.6) ωr R Γ b where D is another proportionality factor. Full derivation of the electron sampling formulation can be found in [142].

By obtaining the f observational data points related to the FF and FB transitions for a particular object, where in Equation 4.6 stands for the energy of resonance, and plotting them as a function of energy alongside the MB distribution, as given by Equation 4.4, for suitably-chosen temperatures, the observational electron distribution can be compared to the MB theoretical distribution.

As part of the current investigation, we carried out these calculations on the data sets that contain more than one FF or FB transition to be useful for comparison to the MB distribution. The resonance data required for these calculations are given in Table 4.18. In Figures 4.19-4.23 the results of the calculations are √ presented where the E-scaled Maxwell-Boltzmann electron distribution for the given temperature, which is chosen as the temperature that we obtained for that object from our least squares procedure, is plotted against electron energy on a √ log-linear graph alongside the E-scaled observed data points representing the electron fraction in the given energy range for the FF and FB transitions of the √ selected lines from the indicated object and cited data source. The E-scaled κ and Druyvesteyn distributions are also plotted in these ﬁgures for comparison 4.3 Electron Distribution 134

using typical values for the parameters of these functions which are given by the following equations [203]

2 r E Γ(κ + 1) E −(κ+1) ( ) = √ 1 + (4.7) fκ,Eκ E 3/2 1 πκ Eκ Eκ Γ κ − 2 κEκ

and x 5 3/2 √ " 5 # ! x Γ 2 x EΓ 2 x fx,Ex (E) = E exp − (4.8) 3/2 3 5/2 3 Ex ExΓ x Γ 2 x 2

where κ and x are parameters characterizing these distributions, while Eκ and Ex are characteristic energies.

As seen, there is in general a few observed data points to constrain the trend and determine decisively if the observed electron distribution is MB or not. However, the scattering of these data points is not far from MB, although in some cases the observational data may also broadly resemble a Druyvesteyn distribution and this similarity may even improve for carefully chosen Druyvesteyn parameters. An interesting point is that the ﬁt between the observational data points and the MB curve generally improves as the temperature of the curve approaches the broadly- known temperature of the object.

Table 4.18: The 64 autoionizing states of C+ used in the current study with their energy in Ryd, departure coeﬃcient, and autoionization probability in s−1. The 1s2 core is suppressed from all conﬁgurations.

Index Conﬁguration Level E b Γa 1 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Do 0.0160449523 0.0056778500 1.240914E+07 3/2 2 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Do 0.0161440982 0.0261058105 5.390253E+07 5/2 3 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Po 0.0198592428 0.0002217072 4.494221E+05 5/2 4 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Po 0.0200528871 0.0109357666 2.600220E+07 3/2 5 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Po 0.0201782774 0.0044633618 1.054050E+07 1/2 6 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Fo 0.0298595786 0.9981159635 1.159802E+12 5/2 7 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Fo 0.0302407616 0.9981660633 1.195966E+12 7/2 8 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Po 0.0502577447 0.9925373136 2.193909E+11 3/2 9 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Po 0.0504825543 0.9928976298 2.304847E+11 1/2 4.3 Electron Distribution 135

Table 4.18: continued.

Index Conﬁguration Level E b Γa 10 2s2p(3Po)4s 4Po 0.1174409992 0.9062462126 5.264264E+09 1/2 11 2s2p(3Po)4s 4Po 0.1176606145 0.9595276889 1.292497E+10 3/2 12 2s2p(3Po)4s 4Po 0.1180785216 0.0000000000 0.000000E+00 5/2 13 2s2p(3Po)4s 2Po 0.1378830490 0.9999959170 1.267096E+14 1/2 14 2s2p(3Po)4s 2Po 0.1383845207 0.9999959515 1.270574E+14 3/2 15 2s2p(3Po)4p 2Pe 0.1616554031 0.5081258069 4.383575E+08 1/2 16 2s2p(3Po)4p 2Pe 0.1618888697 0.8281132233 2.043629E+09 3/2 17 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 0.1648956865 0.0166709970 1.096506E+06 1/2 18 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 0.1650135133 0.9428663460 1.059104E+09 3/2 19 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 0.1652179105 0.9575548715 1.436774E+09 5/2 20 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 0.1655322976 0.0000000000 0.000000E+00 7/2 21 2s2p(3Po)4p 4Se 0.1740799826 0.0023540601 1.361289E+05 3/2 22 2s2p(3Po)4p 4Pe 0.1795026594 0.9721418782 1.500088E+09 1/2 23 2s2p(3Po)4p 4Pe 0.1796552966 0.9802394591 2.134176E+09 3/2 24 2s2p(3Po)4p 4Pe 0.1798464804 0.9965561757 1.249636E+10 5/2 25 2s2p(3Po)4p 2De 0.1854199383 0.9999806616 2.450767E+13 3/2 26 2s2p(3Po)4p 2De 0.1846436636 0.9999809896 2.436138E+13 5/2 27 2s2p(3Po)4p 2Se 0.1997648585 0.9999637714 8.854266E+12 1/2 28 2s2p(1Po)3s 2Po 0.2058921572 0.9999507406 6.254162E+13 1/2 29 2s2p(1Po)3s 2Po 0.2059121732 0.9999505223 6.218950E+13 3/2 30 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Fo 0.2086057952 0.0130742833 1.050972E+06 3/2 31 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Fo 0.2087298186 0.5207186031 8.735439E+07 5/2 32 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Fo 0.2089176308 0.6046487195 1.231846E+08 7/2 33 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Fo 0.2091829917 0.0000000000 0.000000E+00 9/2 34 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Do 0.2137906313 0.0240817145 4.770103E+07 1/2 35 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Do 0.2138393841 0.0111774423 2.183347E+07 3/2 36 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Do 0.2139172974 0.0140469244 2.749728E+07 5/2 37 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Do 0.2140182658 0.0623175129 1.279541E+08 7/2 38 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Do 0.2181284447 0.3163623529 4.111112E+08 3/2 39 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Do 0.2182467272 0.1161936608 1.173714E+08 5/2 40 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Po 0.2200435636 0.0044332899 5.029955E+06 5/2 41 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Po 0.2202300088 0.0095968218 1.099796E+07 3/2 42 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Po 0.2203477445 0.0066028492 7.552275E+06 1/2 43 2s2p(3Po)4f 2Fe 0.2225695047 0.4062779057 1.887721E+08 5/2 44 2s2p(3Po)4f 2Fe 0.2226518832 0.0014994709 4.083866E+05 7/2 45 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Fe 0.2226157059 0.3253636102 1.231093E+08 3/2 46 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Fe 0.2226627273 0.3227642510 1.220007E+08 5/2 4.4 Epilogue 136

Table 4.18: continued.

Index Conﬁguration Level E b Γa 47 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Fe 0.2227230532 0.0414199477 1.122416E+07 7/2 48 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Fe 0.2227599595 0.0926167497 2.606316E+07 9/2 49 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Fo 0.2259594181 0.9967124124 3.003092E+11 5/2 50 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Fo 0.2263462510 0.9968281849 3.121474E+11 7/2 51 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Ge 0.2267242446 0.0410695674 1.127515E+07 5/2 52 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Ge 0.2268078989 0.3627478405 1.492546E+08 7/2 53 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Ge 0.2270049148 0.3399201973 1.350812E+08 9/2 54 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Ge 0.2272718249 0.0000000000 0.000000E+00 11/2 55 2s2p(3Po)4f 2Ge 0.2271098017 0.6893371371 5.331860E+08 7/2 56 2s2p(3Po)4f 2Ge 0.2274615507 0.7843011811 8.601144E+08 9/2 57 2s2p(3Po)4f 4De 0.2281245886 0.0002600797 6.139194E+04 7/2 58 2s2p(3Po)4f 4De 0.2282086986 0.9951533708 4.934209E+10 5/2 59 2s2p(3Po)4f 4De 0.2284089951 0.9846397825 1.519940E+10 3/2 60 2s2p(3Po)4f 4De 0.2285283711 0.0000000000 0.000000E+00 1/2 61 2s2p(3Po)4f 2De 0.2284110910 0.9979488054 9.860173E+10 5/2 62 2s2p(3Po)4f 2De 0.2286146681 0.9984868233 1.359512E+11 3/2 63 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Po 0.2332306002 0.9986068098 5.007744E+11 3/2 64 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Po 0.2334757310 0.9986193975 5.083958E+11 1/2

4.4 Epilogue

In the end of this chapter, an important issue should be addressed that is how to justify the large discrepancy in the temperature values obtained by diﬀerent investigators from diﬀerent atoms, ions, and types of transition. In the following points we propose some possible reasons for this discrepancy.

• Differences in theoretical, observational and numerical techniques used to infer electron temperatures. Since the frameworks of these techniques are different the results may also differ.

• The astronomical objects in general and planetary nebulae in particular are extensive objects with complex structure of varying physical conditions. 4.4 Epilogue 137

NGC7009, T = 5700 K 4 10 Maxwell κ−distribution Druyvesteyn Observed 3 10

2 10 0.5 1 10

0 10

−1 10 Electron Fraction / Energy

−2 10

−3 10

−4 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 −19 Electron Energy (J) x 10

Figure 4.19: Electron distribution plot for NGC 7009 data of Fang and Liu [1], alongside Maxwell-Boltzmann, κ (= 5.0) and Druyvesteyn (with x = 2.0) distributions for T = 5700 K. The y-axis is in arbitrary units.

Hence, the collected spectrum normally originates from different regions in the object which are subject to different physical conditions, including temperature. Therefore, there is no contradiction in some cases of varying electron temperatures as they can be deduced from transitions originating from different regions.

• Selectivity of electron temperature by diﬀerent types of transition (e.g. forbidden or recombination) from the same or diﬀerent species. Because each type of transition of a particular species is optimal at certain ranges of electron energy, the deduced temperature is dependent on these factors [156].

• Finally, observational and theoretical errors (gross, systematic, random, etc.) should also be considered as a possible reason in some cases especially for some eccentric results. 4.4 Epilogue 138

NGC7027−Zhang, T = 12300 K 4 10 Maxwell κ−distribution Druyvesteyn Observed

3 10 0.5

Electron Fraction / Energy 10

1 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 −19 Electron Energy (J) x 10

Figure 4.20: Electron distribution plot for NGC 7027 data of Zhang et al [3], alongside Maxwell-Boltzmann, κ (= 5.0) and Druyvesteyn (with x = 2.0) distributions for T = 12300 K. The y-axis is in arbitrary units.

IC418, T = 8200 K 4 10 Maxwell κ−distribution Druyvesteyn Observed

3 10 0.5

2 10

1 10 Electron Fraction / Energy

0 10

−1 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 −19 Electron Energy (J) x 10

Figure 4.21: Electron distribution plot for IC 418 data of Sharpee et al [4], alongside Maxwell-Boltzmann, κ (= 5.0) and Druyvesteyn (with x = 2.0) distributions for T = 8200 K. The y-axis is in arbitrary units. 4.4 Epilogue 139

CPD, T = 17300 K −6 10 Maxwell κ−distribution Druyvesteyn Observed

−7 10 0.5

−8

Electron Fraction / Energy 10

−9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 −19 Electron Energy (J) x 10

Figure 4.22: Electron distribution plot for CPD - 56◦8032 data of De Marco et al [5], alongside Maxwell-Boltzmann, κ (= 5.0) and Druyvesteyn (with x = 2.0) distributions for T = 17300 K. The y-axis is in arbitrary units.

He2−113, T = 16200 K −7 10 Maxwell κ−distribution Druyvesteyn Observed 0.5

−8 10 Electron Fraction / Energy

−9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 −19 Electron Energy (J) x 10

Figure 4.23: Electron distribution plot for He 2-113 data of De Marco et al [5], alongside Maxwell-Boltzmann, κ (= 5.0) and Druyvesteyn (with x = 2.0) distributions for T = 16200 K. The y-axis is in arbitrary units. Part II

Molecular Physics:

A Computed Line List for Molecular Ion

+ H2D Chapter 5

+ Computed Line List for H2D

In this part of the thesis, we present our comprehensive, highly-accurate calculated line list of frequencies and transition probabilities for the singly deuterated

+ + isotopologue of H3 ,H2D . The list, called ST1, contains over 22 million rotational- vibrational transitions occurring between more than 33 thousand energy levels and covers frequencies up to 18500 cm−1. Due to its simplicity and cosmological and

+ astrophysical importance, H2D has been the subject of a substantial number of spectroscopic and astronomical studies in the last three decades. We hope that our line list and the associated conclusions presented in this thesis will be a valuable contribution in this direction that other researchers will beneﬁt from [204].

5.1 Introduction

+ H2D is one of the simplest polyatomic quantum systems and the lightest asymmetric top molecular ion. It has a substantial permanent electric dipole moment of about 0.6 Debye due to the displacement of the center of charge from the center of mass. It consists of two electrons bound to three nuclei (two protons and one deuteron) forming a triangular shape at equilibrium. The molecule is a pro-

141 5.1 Introduction 142

late top with three normal vibrational modes: a symmetric breathing mode ν1, a bending mode ν2, and an asymmetric stretch ν3. All these modes are infrared active. Depending on the spin alignment of its protons, it has two diﬀerent species,

+ ortho and para, with a spin weight ratio of 3:1. Because H2D has a permanent dipole moment, it possesses pure rotational transitions which mainly occur in the sub-millimeter region (far infrared and microwave) and hence it can be observed in emission or absorption from ground-based detectors. This all contrasts strongly

+ with the non-deuterated H3 molecular ion which has no allowed rotational spectrum and only one infrared active vibrational mode [205–208].

In cool astrophysical environments, where this molecule is mostly found and where it plays very important role, the molecule is formed by several reactions; the main one is

+ + H3 + HD → H2D + H2 (5.1)

Because this and other similar formation reactions are exothermic, the formation of

+ H2D in the cold interstellar environment is favored. Consequently, the abundance of this species is enhanced relative to the D/H ratio.

+ H2D possesses very rich rotational and roto-vibrational spectra. As an iso-

+ + topomer of H3 ,H2D is a major participant in chemical reactions taking place in the interstellar medium. In particular, it plays a key role in the deuteration

+ processes in these environments [209]. Although the existence of H2D in the interstellar medium (ISM) and astrophysical objects was contemplated decades ago [205, 210] with some reported tentative sighting [211–213], it is only relatively recently that the molecule was ﬁrmly detected in the ISM via one of its rotational transition lines [214]. There have been many subsequent astronomical studies re-

+ lated to H2D spectra [215–222]. In particular these spectra have been used to investigate the mid-plane of proto-planetary disks [223], the kinematics of the cen- 5.1 Introduction 143 ters of pre-stellar cores [224], and the suggestion of possible use as a probe for the presence of the hypothetical cloudlets forming the baryonic dark matter [225].

+ Vibrational transitions of H2D have yet to be observed astronomically.

+ The important role of H2D in the astrophysical molecular chemistry, especially in the deuterium fractionation processes, was recognized since the early stages

+ of radio astronomy development. Because H3 lacks a permanent dipole moment and hence cannot be detected via radio astronomy, its asymmetrical isotopomers,

+ + namely H2D and D2H , are the most promising tracers of the extremely cold and highly dense interstellar clouds. These species are the last to remain in gaseous state under these extreme conditions with observable pure rotational spectra [205, 226].

+ Of these two isotopomers, H2D is the more abundant and easier to observe and hence it is the main species to utilize in such astrophysical investigations.

+ H2D is the key molecular ion that drives deuterium fractionation of various molecular species by isotope exchange processes in the interstellar medium especially at low temperatures. This results in considerable enhancement of deuterated molecules that may also participate in other deuteration processes by passing their deuterium content to other species. At very low temperatures (∼10 K), where

+ abundant species, such as CO, N2 and O2, that consume H2D freeze out onto

+ the surface of interstellar dust grains, and where the destruction channels of H2D in the H/D exchange reactions are blocked due to zero-point energy eﬀects, the

+ + formation of H2D is strongly enhanced. This can lead to H2D becoming more

+ abundant than H3 although the cosmic abundance of deuterium is only about

−5 + 2 × 10 that of hydrogen. In these conditions H2D becomes the main source of deuterium fractionation as it is more abundant than any other deuterated species, with subsequent eﬀective deuteration of other species [148, 209, 214, 226–228].

+ The potential importance of H2D spectroscopy for cosmology is obvious as it is a primordial molecular species that could have a considerable abundance in the 5.1.1 Literature Review 144 early universe. In particular, it may have played a role in the cooling of primordial proto-objects [229–233]. Its signiﬁcance is highlighted by a number of studies which

+ consider the role of H2D in spectral distortions of Cosmic Microwave Background

+ Radiation and whether this can be used to determine the H2D and deuterium

+ abundances at diﬀerent epochs [230]. Finally the H2D 372 GHz line has been considered as a probe for the presence of dark matter [225].

In the following we present a short literature review summarizing some land- marks in the investigation of this molecule.

5.1.1 Literature Review

+ H2D is a highly important molecule and hence it was the subject of extensive studies both at laboratory and astrophysical levels in the last few decades. It is regarded as one of the benchmark systems for theoretical and experimental molecular investigations [205, 228, 234, 235].

+ The first successful spectroscopic investigation of H2D was carried out by Shy et al [227] where nine rotational-vibrational transitions were measured in the infrared region between 1800 and 2000 cm−1 using Doppler-tuned fast-ion laser technique, but no specific spectroscopic assignments were made. This was followed by other spectroscopic investigations which include the observation and identification of the strong and highly-important rotational 110 − 111 transition line of

+ ortho-H2D at 372 GHz in 1984 by Bogey et al [207] and Warner et al [228] using

+ discharge techniques. The three fundamental vibrational bands of the H2D ion were also detected and identiﬁed by Amano and Watson [206], Amano [236] and Foster et al [237] using laser spectroscopy.

F´arn´ık et al [208] measured transitions to overtones 2ν2 and 2ν3 and to combi-

+ nation ν2 + ν3 in jet-cooled H2D ions using high-resolution infrared spectroscopic 5.1.1 Literature Review 145 technique. Amano and Hirao [238] also measured the transition frequency of the

+ 110 − 111 line of H2D at 372 GHz with improved accuracy [372.421385(10) GHz].

+ Moreover, the transition frequency of the 321 − 322 line of H2D was observed and measured [646.430293(50) GHz] for the ﬁrst time in this investigation. Hlavenka

+ et al [239] measured second overtone transition frequencies of H2D in the infrared region using cavity ringdown absorption spectroscopy. Other examples of spectroscopic investigations include those of Asvany et al [15], who detected 20 lines with full spectroscopic assignment using laser induced reaction techniques, and the relatively recent work of Yonezu et al [240], who reported precise measurement of the

+ transition frequency of the H2D 212 − 111 line at 2.363 THz, alongside three more

+ far-infrared lines of H2D , using tunable far-infrared spectrometry. However, none of these studies measured absolute line intensities, although the work of F´arn´ık et al [208] and Asvany et al [15] give relative intensities.

On the astronomical side, a tentative observation of the 110 − 111 transition

+ line of ortho-H2D at 372 GHz from NGC 2264 has been reported by Phillips et

+ al [211]. This line is the strongest and the most important of the H2D lines as it involves some of the lowest rotational levels and is the main one that can be observed from ground-based telescopes. Pagani et al [212] have also searched for this line in several dark clouds with no success; nonetheless they derived upper

+ limits for the ortho-H2D column density. A similar failed attempt to observe this line in a number of interstellar clouds including NGC 2264 was made by van

+ Dishoeck et al [210]. In their search for the rotational transitions of H2D , Boreiko and Betz [213] detected an absorption feature toward the IRc2 region of M42. The feature was suspected to be from the lowest rotational 101 − 000 transition at 1370

+ GHz of para-H2D .

+ The ﬁrst conﬁrmed astronomical observation of H2D was made in 1999 by

Stark et al [214] who reported the detection of the 110 − 111 ground-state transition 5.1.2 Line Lists 146

+ line of ortho-H2D at 372 GHz in emission from the young stellar object NGC 1333 IRAS 4A. This was followed by the detection of this line towards the pre-stellar core L1544 by Caselli et al [215] and the detection of the same line toward another

+ pre-stellar core 16293E by Vastel et al [216]. The 372 GHz line of H2D was also detected toward a disk source DM Tau, and tentatively detected toward TW Hya by Ceccarelli et al [217]. Other conﬁrmed or tentative sightings of this line include the observation toward I16293A [218], toward L1544 and L183 [241, 242], in the starless core Barnard 68 [219], and in a massive pre-stellar core in Orion B [220].

+ H2D has also been detected in absorption toward Sgr B2 in the galactic center

+ through the far-infrared 212 − 111 transition of ortho-H2D at 2363.325 GHz [221].

+ Recently, H2D has been observed through the 372 GHz 110 − 111 line in seven starless cores and four protostellar cores by Caselli et al [222].

5.1.2 Line Lists

+ Several synthetic H2D line lists have been generated from ab initio calculations in the last few decades. Prominent examples include the line list of Miller et al [234] and another one generated by Tennyson and co-workers as part of the work reported by Asvany et al [15]. Miller et al’s list extends to rotational quantum number J = 30 and covers all levels up to 5500 cm−1 above the ground state. These lists were used in a number of studies for various purposes such as spectroscopic assignment of energy levels and transition lines from astronomical observations, and for computation of low-temperature partition functions [6]. The line lists also played an important role in motivating and steering the experimental and observational

+ work in this field [15, 234]. Nonetheless, the previous H2D line lists suffered from limitations that include low energy cut-off and the inclusion of a limited number of levels especially at high J. These limitations, alongside the recent developments in computing technology and the availability of high accuracy ab initio models of 5.2 Method 147

+ + H3 and its isotopologues, including H2D , represented by the potential and dipole surfaces of Polyansky and Tennyson [243], provided the motivation to generate a more comprehensive and accurate line list. The intention is that the new list will both ﬁll the previous gaps and provide data of better quality.

+ The H2D line list presented in this thesis, called ST1, consists of 22164810 transition lines occurring between 33330 rotational-vibrational levels. These are all the energy levels with rotational quantum number J ≤ 20 and frequencies below 18500 cm−1 as an upper cut-oﬀ limit for both levels and transitions. This

+ line list can be seen as a companion to the H3 line list of Neale et al [7] which has been extensively used for astrophysical studies; although for reasons explained below, the ST1 line list is actually expected to be more accurate. More details about ST1 will follow.

5.2 Method

+ As indicated already, the main code used to generate the H2D line list is the DVR3D code of Tennyson et al [244] which is a suite of programs for performing rotational-vibrational calculations on triatomic molecules. The code calculates, among other things, wavefunctions, energy levels, transition lines, dipole moments, and transition probabilities. DVR3D is based on a discrete variable representation (DVR) approach by using Gauss-Jacobi and Gauss-Laguerre quadrature schemes for representing the internal coordinates. The code uses an exact Hamiltonian, within the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, and requires potential energy and dipole surfaces to be supplied as an input. In general, it is these surfaces which largely determine the accuracy of the resulting calculations [245] assuming a good choice of DVR3D input parameters. The DVR3D code consists of four main stages: vibration, rotation, dipole and spectra. These stages are fully documented by Ten- 5.2 Method 148 nyson et al [244], and hence the following discussion about these stages is restricted to what is necessary to clarify the method that we followed in generating the ST1 list. In general, the parameters of these stages were chosen following extensive consistency and convergence tests, some of which are outlined. The results were regularly compared to the available experimental and observational data and the theoretical results from previous investigations. A sample of these comparisons, validations and preliminary results will follow in the subsequent sections.

The vibrational stage of the DVR3D suite requires an accurate model for the variation of electronic potential as a function of nuclear geometry. This potential energy surface, which is supplied through a fortran subroutine, is usually obtained from ab initio calculations enhanced by empirical adjustment to improve the ﬁt

+ to experimental data. For the generation of ST1 list, we used the H3 global potential surface of Polyansky et al [246], who used the ultra-high accurate ab initio data of Cencek et al [247] supplemented by extra data points to reach about 200 data points in total. The surface was constrained at high energy by the data of

+ Schinke et al [248]. We complemented this surface by adding the H2D adiabatic correction term ﬁtted by Polyansky and Tennyson [243]. To allow for non-adiabatic corrections to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, we employed Polyansky and Tennyson’s [243] vibrational mass scaling where diﬀerent values for the reduced nuclear mass were used for modeling vibrational and rotational motions. We used

µH = 1.0075372 u and µD = 2.0138140 u for the vibrational atomic masses, and

µH = 1.00727647 u and µD = 2.01355320 u for the rotational atomic masses. The accuracy of this model will be assessed below.

Calculations were performed in Jacobi scattering coordinate system (r1, r2, θ),

+ schematically presented in Figure 5.1, to depict the triatomic H2D molecule, where r1 represents the diatomic distance (H-H), r2 is the separation of the D atom from the center of mass of the diatom, and θ is the angle between r1 and r2. This 5.2 Method 149 coordinate system is believed to be more appropriate for an asymmetric molecule

+ like H2D . Radial basis functions of Morse oscillator type were used to model r1

[249], while spherical oscillators were used to model r2 [250]. Following Polyansky and Tennyson [243], the Morse parameters for r1 were set to re = 1.71, De = 0.10 and ωe = 0.0108, with 20 Gauss-Laguerre grid points. Parameters of the spherical oscillator functions were set to α = 0.0 and ωe = 0.0075 with 44 Gauss-Laguerre grid points, following extensive tests on convergence of the vibrational band origins. The essence of these tests is to vary these parameters systematically to minimize the sum of the energy of the rotation-less states. 36 Gauss-Legendre grid points were used to represent the angular motion. The ﬁnal vibrational Hamiltonian matrix used was of dimension 2000. In this investigation six combinations of α and ωe (α = 0.0, 0.5 and 1.0 with ωe = 0.0075 and 0.0095) were used for test in conjunction with 16 diﬀerent values (30, 32,..., 60) for the number of r2 mesh points (NPNT2).

The vibrational stage requires the maximum dimension of the largest intermediate 2D Hamiltonian, MAX2D, and the maximum dimension of the ﬁnal Hamil- tonian, MAX3D, as an input. For these parameters we used values of 1000 and 2000 respectively. The vibrational stage also requires the number of eigenvalues and eigenvectors to be archived for use in the rotational stage (NEVAL). A value of 4000 were chosen for this parameter based on the results of convergence tests.

For the number of DVR mesh points in r2 from Gauss-associated Laguerre quadrature (NPNT2) a value of 44 were chosen, while values of 36 and 20 were used for the number of mesh points in θ (NALF) and in r1 (NPNT1) respectively. The selection of these values was mainly based on the results obtained from previous investigations and our own convergence tests.

In the rotational stage, a value of 2000 was used for the number of vibrational levels for each k to be read and used (NVIB). The size of the Hamiltonian matrix in 5.2 Method 150

H r2

D Figure 5.1: Jacobi scattering coordinate system. this stage (IBASS), which is a function of J, was set to 1800(J +1) following a series of tests on J = 3 and J = 15 in which this parameter was varied incrementally until convergence within an error margin of 0.01 cm−1 was reached. These tests demonstrated that choosing suﬃciently large values for the size of rotational Hamiltonian (IBASS), although computationally very expensive, is crucial for obtaining reliable results. Our aim was to obtain convergence to within 0.01 cm−1 for all rotation- vibration levels considered. Our tests suggest we achieved this except, possibly, for some of the highest lying levels. For these levels our basic model, and in particular our corrections to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, are not expected to be reliable to this accuracy. Recently, an improved ab initio adiabatic potential

+ energy surfaces for H3 and its isotopomers have been developed by Pavanello et al [251]. These surfaces include diagonal Born-Oppenheimer corrections calculated from precise wavefunctions. The use of these surfaces in the future should improve the accuracy of these levels.

To compute the intensity of the vibration-rotation transitions, the transition dipole moments between the states concerned must be known. Therefore, a dipole 5.2 Method 151 moment surface, supplied to the dipole stage in the form of an independent fortran subroutine, is required. This surface is usually obtained from ab initio calculations without empirical adjustment due to limitation on the quality of experimental data if such data are available at all. For ST1 generation, we used the ab initio dipole

+ surface of R¨ohse et al [252] to calculate the components of the H2D dipole. In the DIPOLE3 module of DVR3D we set the number of Gauss-Legendre quadrature points used for evaluating the wavefunctions and dipole surface (NPOT) to 50. This choice is consistent with the requirement that this parameter should be slightly larger than the number of DVR points used to calculate the underlying wavefunctions.

Finally, the last stage, spectra, is for producing the list of transition lines. The data of each line in this list include the attributes of the upper and lower levels, the frequency of the line in cm−1, the line strength, the temperature-dependent absolute and relative intensities, and the Einstein A coefficient. The actual transitions file of the ST1 list represents a summary of the transitions file produced by spectra stage, where the upper and lower levels in the ST1 file are identified by a unique index from the levels file alongside the Einstein A coefficient. These data augmented with the data in the levels file are sufficient to find the intensity and other temperature-dependent quantities. The purpose of this compact form presentation of the transition data is to reduce file size and avoid possible errors and confusion.

The final ST1 line list consists of two main files: one for the levels and the other for the transitions. These two files are constructed and formatted according to the method and style of the BT2 water line list of Barber et al [253]. The total amount of CPU time spent in producing the ST1 list including preparation, convergence tests, and verifying the final results was about 8000 hours. We used the serial version of the DVR3D suite on PC platforms running Linux (Red Hat) 5.2 Method 152 operating system, as part of the computing network of the Physics Department, University College London. Both 32- and 64-bit machines were used in this work although the final data were produced mainly on 64-bit machines due to the huge memory requirement of the DVR3D code especially for the high-J calculations. Large samples of data produced by these machines were compared and found to be identical.

It should be remarked that the outlined variational nuclear motion procedure used for these calculations provides rigorous quantum numbers: J, ortho/para and parity p, but not the standard approximate quantum numbers in normal mode, rigid rotor notation. We therefore hand labeled those levels for which such quantum numbers could be assigned in a fairly straightforward fashion. 5000 of these levels are fully designated with 3 rotational (J, Ka,Kc) and 3 vibrational (v1, v2, v3) quantum numbers, while 341 levels are identiﬁed with rotational quantum numbers only. The assignments were made by ﬁrst identifying 176 experimentally-assigned levels. The rotation-less levels are then assigned by taking Ka = Kc = 0 when J = 0. This is followed by the assignment of the vibrational ground state levels which are obtained mainly from Polyansky et al [254]. All these assignments can then provide a guess for many other levels. For example, the energy of the

(v1, v2, v3, J, Ka,Kc) level can be estimated from the energy of the (0, 0, 0, J, Ka,Kc) and (v1, v2, v3, 0, 0, 0) levels. Many gaps can then be filled as the missing levels can be uniquely identified from the identified ones in their neighborhood. Some of these assignments are made as a tentative guess and hence the assignments in general should be treated with caution. Tables 5.1 and 5.2 present samples of the ST1 levels and transitions files respectively. A sample of the input data files used as an input to the DVR3D code in various stages of production of ST1, as well as the input files of Spectra-BT2 code used to generate the synthetic spectra, is given in AppendixF. 5.2 Method 153

Table 5.1: Sample of the ST1 levels ﬁle. The columns from left to right are for: −1 index of level in ﬁle, J, symmetry, index of level in block, frequency in cm , v1, v2, v3, J, Ka, Kc. We used -2 to mark unassigned quantum numbers.

720 1 4 89 17645.80538 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 721 1 4 90 17699.90283 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 722 1 4 91 17712.30089 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 723 1 4 92 17778.46381 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 724 1 4 93 17840.99975 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 725 1 4 94 17902.76377 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 726 1 4 95 18005.04261 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 727 1 4 96 18113.51953 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 728 1 4 97 18163.92137 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 729 1 4 98 18226.60371 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 730 1 4 99 18265.61525 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 731 1 4 100 18379.99989 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 732 1 4 101 18499.05736 -2 -2 -2 1 1 0 733 2 1 1 131.63473 0 0 0 2 0 2 734 2 1 2 223.86306 0 0 0 2 2 0 735 2 1 3 2318.35091 0 1 0 2 0 2 736 2 1 4 2427.09231 0 1 0 2 2 0 737 2 1 5 2490.93374 0 0 1 2 1 2 738 2 1 6 3123.27957 1 0 0 2 0 2 739 2 1 7 3209.80678 1 0 0 2 2 0 740 2 1 8 4407.78525 0 2 0 2 0 2 741 2 1 9 4512.34757 0 2 0 2 2 0 742 2 1 10 4563.25961 0 1 1 2 1 2 743 2 1 11 4761.25784 0 0 2 2 0 2 744 2 1 12 4845.07742 0 0 2 2 2 0 745 2 1 13 5157.02577 1 1 0 2 0 2 746 2 1 14 5256.75108 1 1 0 2 2 0 747 2 1 15 5392.06999 1 0 1 2 1 2 748 2 1 16 6006.36278 2 0 0 2 0 2 749 2 1 17 6088.92801 2 0 0 2 2 0 750 2 1 18 6404.39091 0 3 0 2 0 2 751 2 1 19 6514.12841 0 3 0 2 2 0 752 2 1 20 6536.82044 0 2 1 2 1 2 753 2 1 21 6730.08074 0 1 2 2 0 2 754 2 1 22 6881.05077 0 1 2 2 2 0 755 2 1 23 6988.69291 -2 -2 -2 2 -2 -2 756 2 1 24 7123.16702 1 2 0 2 0 2 757 2 1 25 7211.77759 1 2 0 2 2 0 758 2 1 26 7333.23873 -2 -2 -2 2 -2 -2 759 2 1 27 7564.78576 -2 -2 -2 2 -2 -2 5.3 Validation and Primary Results 154

Table 5.2: Sample of the ST1 transitions file. The first two columns are for the indices of the two levels in the levels file, while the third column is for the A coefficients in s−1.

30589 29553 7.99E-04 19648 18049 8.37E-03 8943 7423 5.55E-01 8490 7981 2.18E-03 20620 22169 6.91E-04 17613 15937 5.62E-03 13046 11400 1.15E+00 20639 20054 7.26E-03 14433 17117 2.49E-03 25960 28074 1.92E-03 10371 8748 3.80E-02 10380 12978 2.61E-04 6353 6778 4.34E-04 12834 14507 8.68E-04 19391 18843 2.05E-03 29648 27652 9.58E-05 25891 26331 3.67E-04 16727 19473 1.23E-03 17387 14665 1.63E-03 9227 11797 9.18E-06

5.3 Validation and Primary Results

In this section we present a number of comparisons that we made between the ST1 list and data sets found in the literature to validate our list. We also present some preliminary results that we obtained from ST1.

5.3.1 Comparison to Experimental and Theoretical Data

To validate our results, a number of comparisons between the ST1 line list and experimental data found in the literature were carried out. The main data sources of laboratory measurements that have been used in these comparisons are presented in Table 5.3. The table also gives statistical information about the discrepancy 5.3.2 Partition Function 155 between the calculated line frequencies and their experimental counterparts. Ta- ble 5.4 presents a rather detailed account of this comparison for a sample data extracted from one of these data sets, specifically that of Asvany et al [15]. This table also contains a comparison of relative Einstein B coefficients between theoretical values from ST1 and measured values from Asvany et al. The theoretical values in this table are obtained from the calculated A coefficients using the relation [148]

(2J 0 + 1)c3A B = ul (5.2) lu (2J 00 + 1)8πhν3

where Aul and Blu are the Einstein A and B coeﬃcients respectively for transition between upper (u) and lower (l) states, J 0 and J 00 are the rotational quantum numbers for upper and lower states, c is the speed of light, h is Planck’s constant, and ν is the transition frequency.

Tables 5.5 and 5.6 present more comparisons to Asvany et al [15] data. As seen, in all cases the ST1 values agree very well with the measured values of Asvany et al within acceptable experimental errors. Other comparisons to previous theoretical data, such as that of Polyansky and Tennyson [243], were also made and the outcome was satisfactory in all cases.

5.3.2 Partition Function

The partition function of a system consisting of an ensemble of particles in thermodynamic equilibrium is given by

−E X ( i ) P(T ) = (2Ji + 1)gie kT (5.3) i where i is an index running over all energy states of the ensemble, Ei is the energy of state i above the ground level which has rotational angular momentum Ji, k 5.3.2 Partition Function 156

Table 5.3: The main experimental data sources used to validate the ST1 list. Columns 2 and 3 give the number of data points and the frequency range of the experimental data respectively, while the last four columns represent the minimum, maximum, average, and standard deviation of discrepancies (i.e. observed minus calculated) in cm−1 between the ST1 and the experimental data sets. Source N Range (cm−1) Min. Max. Ave. SD Shy et al [227] 9 1837 – 1953 −0.014 0.116 0.033 0.052 Amano and Watson [206] 27 2839 – 3179 −0.315 0.054 0.033 0.065 Amano [236] 37 2839 – 3209 −0.024 0.054 0.022 0.019 Foster et al [237] 73 1837 – 2603 −0.134 0.213 0.072 0.067 F´arn´ık et al [208] 8 4271 – 4539 0.046 0.172 0.104 0.050 Asvany et al [15] 25 2946 – 7106 0.008 0.242 0.120 0.088

Table 5.4: Comparison between measured (Asvany et al [15]) and calculated (ST1) frequencies and relative Einstein B coefficients for a number of transition lines of + H2D . These coefficients are normalized to the last line in the table. The absolute B coefficients, as obtained from the A coefficients of ST1 list using Equation 5.2, are also shown in column 5 as multiples of 1014 and in units of m.kg−1. Transition Freq. (cm−1) B Relative B Vib. Rot. Obs. ST1 ST1 Obs. ST1

(0,3,0) 110 ← 111 6303.784 6303.676 8.05 0.29 0.29 (0,3,0) 101 ← 000 6330.973 6330.850 8.59 0.32±0.02 0.31 (0,2,1) 000 ← 111 6340.688 6340.456 7.36 0.27±0.03 0.27 (0,2,1) 202 ← 111 6459.036 6458.794 9.17 0.35±0.04 0.34 (0,2,1) 111 ← 000 6466.532 6466.300 27.3 1.00 1.00

is Boltzmann’s constant, T is temperature, and gi is the nuclear spin degeneracy factor which is 1 for para states and 3 for ortho ones.

+ Using the ST1 energy levels we calculated the partition function of H2D for a range of temperatures and compared the results to those obtained by Sidhu et al [6]. Table 5.7 presents these results for a temperature range of 5 – 4000 K. The results are also graphically presented in Figure 5.2. The table and figure reveal that although our results and those of Sidhu et al agree very well at low temperatures (below 1200 K), they differ significantly at high temperatures and the deviation increases as the temperature rises. This can be explained by the fact that ST1 contains more energy levels, particularly at high energy, which contribute 5.3.2 Partition Function 157

Table 5.5: Asvany [15] data for the second overtone and combination transitions + of H2D compared to the corresponding data as calculated from the ST1 list. Transition ν (cm−1) A (s−1) B (s−1) Vib. Rot. Asv ST1 Asv ST1 Asv ST1

(0,3,0) 000 ← 101 6241.966 6241.854 7.08 7.08 0.21 0.21 (0,3,0) 111 ← 110 6270.392 6270.272 2.13 2.13 0.19 0.19 (0,3,0) 110 ← 111 6303.784 6303.676 3.36 3.36 0.29 0.29 (0,3,0) 101 ← 000 6330.973 6330.850 1.21 1.21 0.31 0.31

(0,2,1) 000 ← 111 6340.688 6340.456 9.36 9.37 0.27 0.27 (0,2,1) 101 ← 110 6369.460 6369.219 6.04 6.04 0.51 0.51 (0,2,1) 110 ← 101 6433.742 6433.514 4.64 4.64 0.38 0.38 (0,2,1) 202 ← 111 6459.036 6458.794 2.47 2.47 0.34 0.34 (0,2,1) 111 ← 000 6466.532 6466.300 4.10 4.10 1.00 1.00 (0,2,1) 303 ← 212 6483.576 6483.335 3.86 3.86 0.44 0.44 (0,2,1) 212 ← 101 6491.349 6491.124 4.49 4.49 0.60 0.60 (0,2,1) 221 ← 110 6573.837 6573.616 3.64 3.64 0.47 0.47 (0,2,1) 220 ← 111 6589.412 6589.193 2.49 2.49 0.32 0.32

(1,2,0) 000 ← 101 6945.877 6945.831 10.25 10.30 0.22 0.23 (1,2,0) 111 ← 110 6974.252 6974.199 5.54 5.54 0.36 0.36 (1,2,0) 110 ← 111 7004.803 7004.759 5.10 5.10 0.33 0.33 (1,2,0) 101 ← 000 7039.362 7039.309 3.72 3.72 0.70 0.70 (1,2,0) 212 ← 111 7066.839 7066.777 3.60 3.60 0.37 0.37 (1,2,0) 202 ← 101 7077.529 7077.470 4.05 4.05 0.42 0.42 (1,2,0) 211 ← 110 7105.518 7105.464 3.38 3.38 0.35 0.35

+ Table 5.6: Asvany [15] data for the transitions of the (1,0,0) band of H2D detected with an optical parametric oscillator systems compared to the corresponding data as calculated from the ST1 list. Transition ν (cm−1) A (s−1) B (s−1) Asv ST1 Asv ST1 Asv ST1

000 ← 101 2946.805 2946.790 53.167 53.200 0.318 0.318 110 ← 111 3003.279 3003.267 27.509 27.500 0.466 0.465 101 ← 000 3038.182 3038.158 20.353 20.400 1.000 1.000 212 ← 111 3068.850 3068.817 20.088 20.100 0.532 0.531 220 ← 101 3164.118 3164.110 1.5976 1.6000 0.040 0.039 increasingly at high temperatures. Moreover, the Sidhu list has a lower limit for the upper cut-oﬀ energy and hence the levels at the top cannot contribute to the high-energy transitions beyond a certain limit. We therefore expect our partition 5.3.3 Cooling Function 158 function to be the more reliable one for T > 1200 K.

Using a Levenberg-Marquardt nonlinear curve-fitting routine, we fitted the ST1 partition function curve in the indicated range to a fifth order polynomial in temperature 5 X i P(T ) = aiT (5.4) i=0 and obtained the following coefficients for T in Kelvin:

a0 = −0.300315

a1 = +0.094722

a2 = +0.000571

−7 a3 = −3.24415 × 10

−10 a4 = +2.01240 × 10

−14 a5 = −1.94176 × 10 (5.5)

The fitting curve is not shown on Figure 5.2 because it is virtually identical to the ST1 curve within the graph resolution. The root-mean-square of the percentage error between the polynomial fit and the line list values, as given in Table 5.7, is about 0.18. It should be remarked that the fitting polynomial is valid only within the fitting temperature range (5 – 4000 K) and hence cannot be extrapolated beyond this range. Moreover, we recommend using the line list directly to obtain more reliable values for the partition function because the purpose of the fitting polynomial is to show the trend rather than to be a substitute for the line list.

5.3.3 Cooling Function

+ ST1 was also used to compute the cooling function of H2D as a function of temperature. The cooling function W which quantiﬁes the rate of cooling per molecule 5.3.3 Cooling Function 159

+ Table 5.7: The partition function of H2D for a number of temperatures as obtained from Sidhu et al [6] and ST1 line lists. T (K) Partition Function T (K) Partition Function Sidhu ST1 Sidhu ST1 5 1.00 1.00 800 347.58 347.53 10 1.01 1.01 900 426.24 426.24 20 1.07 1.28 1000 515.43 516.31 30 2.15 2.15 1200 731.43 737.61 40 3.46 3.46 1400 1004.25 1026.84 50 5.05 5.05 1600 1339.43 1401.52 60 6.82 6.82 1800 1738.89 1881.33 70 8.73 8.73 2000 2203.94 2487.98 80 10.76 10.76 2200 2735.31 3244.83 90 12.90 12.89 2400 3327.58 4176.19 100 15.12 15.12 2600 3983.83 5306.36 150 27.56 27.55 2800 4698.51 6658.69 200 42.03 42.02 3000 8254.62 300 76.49 76.46 3200 10112.90 400 117.48 117.44 3400 12249.00 500 164.51 164.53 3600 14674.90 600 218.11 217.98 3800 17398.90 700 278.66 278.58 4000 20425.60 for dense gas in local thermodynamic equilibrium is given by

! 1 X ( −Eu ) W (T ) = A (E − E )(2J + 1)g e kT (5.6) P ul u l u u u,l where P is the partition function as given by Equation 5.3, A is the spontaneous transition probability, E is the energy of the state above the ground level, J is the rotational angular momentum quantum number, k is Boltzmann’s constant, T is

+ the temperature, g is the nuclear spin degeneracy factor which, for H2D , is 1 for para states and 3 for ortho states, and u and l stand for the upper and lower levels respectively.

Figure 5.3 graphically presents ST1 cooling function (upper curve) as a function of temperature for a certain temperature range alongside the cooling function of 5.3.3 Cooling Function 160

25000

20000

15000

10000 Partition Function

5000

0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Temperature (K)

+ Figure 5.2: The H2D partition functions of ST1 (upper curve) and Sidhu et al [6] (lower curve).

+ Neale et al [7] for H3 ion as obtained from a digitized image. As seen, the two curves match very well on the main part of the common temperature range (T >

+ 600 K). However the H2D cooling function continues to be signiﬁcant at lower

+ temperatures, whereas at these temperatures the cooling curve of H3 was not given by Neale et al [7] because they considered it too small to be of signiﬁcance.

+ This shows why the cooling properties of H2D could be important in the cold interstellar clouds. The larger values of ST1 can be explained by the inclusion of more energy states and the higher upper cut-oﬀ energy of this list. It should

+ be remarked that Miller et al [255] have recently improved signiﬁcantly the H3 cooling function of Neale et al [7] by improving the ﬁt to the calculated values of the partition function used in the original computations.

+ Using a Levenberg-Marquardt curve-ﬁtting routine, we ﬁtted our H2D cooling function curve to a fourth order polynomial in temperature over the range 10 – 5.3.4 Synthetic Spectra 161

4000 K and obtained 4 X i W (T ) = biT (5.7) i=0 where

−16 b0 = −1.34302 × 10

−17 b1 = +1.56314 × 10

−19 b2 = −2.69764 × 10

−22 b3 = +7.03602 × 10

−25 b4 = −1.10821 × 10 (5.8)

The ﬁt was essentially perfect on a linear scale.

5.3.4 Synthetic Spectra

One of the main uses of line lists such as ST1 is to generate temperature-dependent synthetic spectra. These spectra were generated from ST1 using the Spectra-BT2 code, which is described by Barber et al [253] and is a modiﬁed version of the original spectra code of Tennyson et al [256]. A Gaussian line proﬁle with 10 data points per cm−1 was used in these computations. In Figure 5.4 a sample of these spectra for the temperatures T = 100, 500, 1000 and 2000 K over the frequency range 0 − 10000 cm−1 is presented. Figure 5.4 (a) shows a temperature-dependent

+ H2D absorbtion spectrum for the region largely associated with pure rotational transitions, while Figures 5.4 (b), (c) and (d) show the corresponding spectrum for

+ the vibrational region. As is usual with rotation-vibration spectra, H2D spectra show a strong dependence on temperature. 5.3.4 Synthetic Spectra 162

−10 10

−11 10

−12 10

) −13

−1 10

−14 10 .molecule −1 −15 .str 10 −1

−16 10

−17 10 Emission (erg.s

−18 10

−19 10

−20 10 1 2 3 4 10 10 10 10 Temperature (K)

+ + Figure 5.3: A graph of per molecule emission of H2D (upper curve) and H3 (lower + curve) as a function of temperature on a log-log scale. The H2D curve is obtained + from ST1 while the H3 curve is obtained from a digitized image from Neale et al [7]. 5.3.4 Synthetic Spectra 163

1.4e-18 4.5e-18 T= 100K T= 100K T= 500K T= 500K T=1000K T=1000K T=2000K 4e-18 T=2000K 1.2e-18

3.5e-18

1e-18 3e-18

8e-19 2.5e-18

2e-18 6e-19

1.5e-18 4e-19

1e-18

2e-19 5e-19

0 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 (a) (b)

1e-18 4e-20 T= 100K T= 100K T= 500K T= 500K 9e-19 T=1000K T=1000K T=2000K 3.5e-20 T=2000K

8e-19 3e-20 7e-19

2.5e-20 6e-19

5e-19 2e-20

4e-19 1.5e-20

3e-19 1e-20 2e-19

5e-21 1e-19

0 0 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 8500 9000 9500 10000 (c) (d)

Figure 5.4: A graph of integrated absorption coeﬃcient in cm.molecule−1 (on y axis) as a function of wave number in cm−1 (on x axis) within the range 0 − 10000 cm−1 for T = 100, 500, 1000 and 2000 K. Chapter 6

Conclusions and Future Work

6.1 Conclusions

In the first part of our atomic investigation, a list of line effective recombination coefficients is generated for the atomic ion C+ using the R-matrix [104], Autostructure [41, 102, 103] and Emissivity [121] codes. These lines are produced by dielectronic capture and subsequent radiative decays of the low-lying autoionizing states above the threshold of C2+ 1s22s2 1Se with a principal quantum number n < 5 for the captured electron. The line list, called SS1, contains 6187 optically-allowed transitions which include many C ii lines observed in astronomical spectra. Beside the effective recombination coefficients, the list also includes detailed data of level energies for bound and resonance states, and oscillator strengths. The theoretical results for energy and fine structure splitting agree very well with the available experimental data for both resonances and bound states. In the course of this investigation, a novel method, namely the K-matrix method, for finding and analyzing resonances was developed as an alternative to the QB [114, 123] and Time-Delay [124] methods. The K-matrix and QB methods produce virtually identical results; however, as far as the one-channel resonances related to the search for the low-lying autoion-

164 6.1 Conclusions 165 izing states is concerned, the K-matrix method offers a superior alternative to the QB method in terms of numerical stability, computational viability and compre- hensiveness. The big advantage of QB is that it is more general and can be used for multi-channel as well as single-channel resonances. The K-matrix method was implemented, elaborated and used in the production of the atomic data leading to this investigation. The theoretical results of our line list were validated by a number of tests such as comparing the energy and fine structure splitting to the available experimental data [16] of autoionizing and bound states. A conclusive comparison to theoretical data previously reported in the literature; which include radiative transition probabilities, effective dielectronic recombination rate coefficients and autoionization probabilities; was carried out to verify our data. All these tests indicate the reliability of our line list. We expect SS1 to fill some of the existing gaps in the theoretical data needed for spectroscopic and astronomical applications.

In the second part of our atomic investigation, we studied the electron temperature of the emitting region of recombination lines in a number of astronomical objects, mainly planetary nebulae, by analyzing the transition lines of C ii which originate from dielectronic recombination processes from the low-lying autoionizing states and subsequent cascade decays. The investigation is based on the use of theoretical data from SS1 list, and observational data from several sources in the refereed literature. In the emissivity analysis we used a least squares minimization method to find the electron temperature of the line emitting region in the investigated objects. Our results were broadly consistent with the reported findings of other studies in the literature, which are mainly obtained from other spectral lines with the use of different analysis techniques. The investigation was concluded by proposing and applying a method for determining electron energy distribution from observational data supplemented by theoretical data from SS1 to investigate the 6.1 Conclusions 166 long-standing problem in the nebular studies related to the dichotomy between the results of abundance and temperature obtained from ORLs and CELs. Although no definite conclusion has been reached, due to the limited quantity of the available pertinent observational data, the observational data seem to suggest a Maxwell- Boltzmann electron distribution opposite to what has been suggested recently in the literature of a κ-distribution.

In the molecular part of this study we investigated the generation of a new

+ line list, called ST1, for the highly-important triatomic ion H2D . The list, which can be obtained from the Centre de Donnéesastronomiques de Strasbourg (CDS) database, comprises over 33 thousand rotational-vibrational energy levels and more than 22 million transition lines archived within two files. Various rigorous tests were performed during all stages of production and after. All these tests confirmed that, although ST1 is based entirely on ab initio quantum mechanics, it is sufficiently accurate for almost all astronomical purposes. The one possible exception is for predicting the frequency of pure rotational transitions which are often needed to high accuracy and which are therefore better obtained from measured frequencies using combination differences. A number of comparisons to the available experimental and theoretical data were made. Several primary results, which include partition and cooling functions as well as temperature-dependent synthetic spectra, were also drawn from this list and presented in this thesis. These comparisons and results also confirmed the reliability of the list. We expect ST1 to be a helpful

+ tool in analyzing and understanding physical processes in various H2D systems at spectroscopic and astronomical levels. 6.2 Recommendations for Future Work 167

6.2 Recommendations for Future Work

There are many aspects of the current work that can be elaborated and extended in the future; some of these prospectives are outlined in the following points

• Extending the theoretical and computational treatments of the atomic investigation by employing more comprehensive theory to incorporate processes and phenomena other than dielectronic recombination, such as radiative recombination and collisional processes. Some of these treatments are already developed and implemented within existing codes while others require developing novel tools.

• Extending the K-matrix method to include multi-channel resonances and implementing it within the R-matrix code or as a stand alone code.

• Pushing the current limit on the principal quantum number of the active elec-

tron in the autoionizing states beyond the n < 5 condition which is adopted in the present work. This extension becomes more important at higher tem-

peratures, as the contribution of resonances arising from the n ≥ 5 levels increases.

• Extending the electron temperature analysis to more data sets and including even the bound-bound transition lines. This depends on the availability of

a more comprehensive C ii list generated on the base of a more comprehensive theoretical foundation which includes processes other than dielectronic recombination, as indicated earlier.

• Improving the least squares method for electron temperature analysis and performing more tests and validations by application to more data sets to identify and ﬁx any possible weaknesses. One of the objectives is to reduce the 6.2 Recommendations for Future Work 168

temperature dependency of the χ2 curve shape which aﬀects the conﬁdence interval.

+ • Extending the H2D line list beyond its current limits of J ≤ 20 for rotational quantum number and ν < 18500 cm−1 for frequency. Bibliography

[1] Fang X.; Liu X.-W. Very deep spectroscopy of the bright Saturn nebula NGC 7009 - I. Observations and plasma diagnostics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 415(1):181–198, 2011.

[2] Baluteau J.P.; Zavagno A.; Morisset C.; P´equignotD. The 654-1046 NM line spectrum of the planetary nebula NGC 7027. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 303:175–203, 1995.

[3] Zhang Y.; Liu X.-W.; Luo S.-G.; P´equignotD.; Barlow M.J. Integrated spectrum of the planetary nebula NGC 7027. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 442(1):249–262, 2005.

[4] Sharpee B.; Williams R.; Baldwin J.A.; van Hoof P.A.M. Introducing EMILI: Computer-aided Emission Line Identiﬁcation . The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 149:157–187, 2003.

[5] De Marco O.; Storey P.J.; Barlow M.J. The WC10 central stars CPD-56 degrees 8032 and He 2-113 - III. Wind electron temperatures and abundances. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 297(4):999–1014, 1997.

[6] Sidhu K.S.; Miller S.; Tennyson J. Partition functions and equilibrium con- + stants for h3p and H2D . Astronomy and Astrophysics, 255(1-2):453–456, 1992.

+ [7] Neale L.; Miller S.; Tennyson J. Spectroscopic Properties of the H3 Molecule: A New Calculated Line List. The Astrophysical Journal, 464:516–520, 1996.

[8] Badnell N.R. The inﬂuence of core ﬁne-structure interactions on dielectronic recombination at low temperatures: B-like C, N and O recombined ions. Journal of Physics B, 21(5):749–767, 1988.

[9] Harrington J.P.; Lutz J.H.; Seaton M.J. Ultraviolet spectra of planetary nebulae. IV - The C iii λ 2297 dielectronic recombination line and dust absorption in the C iv λ 1549 resonance doublet. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 195:21P–26P, 1981.

[10] Peimbert M.; Peimbert A.; Ruiz M.T.; Esteban C. Physical Conditions of the Planetary Nebula NGC 5315 Derived from VLT Echelle Observations and

169 the t2 Problem. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 150:431–454, 2004.

[11] Garc´ıa-Rojas J.; Pena M.; Peimbert A. Faint recombination lines in Galactic PNe with a [WC] nucleus. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 496(1):139–152, 2009.

[12] Ferland G.J.; Williams R.E.; Lambert D.L.; Shields G.A.; Slovak M.; Gond- halekar P.M.; Truran J.W. IUE observations of DQ Herculis and its nebula, and the nature of the cold nova shells. The Astrophysical Journal, 281:194– 204, 1984.

[13] Davey A.R. The recombination spectrum of carbon ii. PhD thesis, University College London, 1995.

[14] Barlow M.J.; Storey P.J. In: Planetary Nebulae; Proceedings of the Interna- tional Astronomical Union Symposium, Innsbruck, Austria, July 13-17, 1992, volume 155. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.

[15] Asvany O.; Hugo E.; M¨ullerF.; K¨uhnemannF.; Schiller S.; Tennyson + + J.; Schlemmer S. Overtone spectroscopy of H2D and D2H using laser induced reactions. Journal of Chemical Physics, 127:154317(1–11), 2007.

[16] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). URL: http://www.nist.gov. 2010.

[17] PéquignotD.; Petitjean P.; Boisson C. Total and effective radiative recombination coefficients. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 251(2):680–688, 1991.

[18] Nahar S.N.; Pradhan A.K.; Zhang H.L. Electron-Ion Recombination Rate Coeﬃcients and Photoionization Cross Sections for Astrophysically Abun- dant Elements. IV. Relativistic Calculations for C iv and C V for Ultravi- olet and X-Ray Modeling . The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 131(1):375–389, 2000.

[19] Badnell N.R.; O’Mullane M.G.; Summers H.P.; Altun Z.; Bautista M.A.; Colgan J.; Gorczyca T.W.; Mitnik D.M.; Pindzola M.S.; Zatsarinny O. Di- electronic recombination data for dynamic ﬁnite-density plasmas I. Goals and methodology. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 406(3):1151–1165, 2003.

[20] Aldrovandi S.M.V.; P´equignotD. Radiative and Dielectronic Recombina- tion Coeﬃcients for Complex Ions. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25:137–140, 1973.

[21] Aldrovandi S.M.V.; P´equignotD. Ionization and Heating of a Low Density Plasma by Energetic Particles. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 26:33–43, 1973.

[22] Ferland G.J. Quantitative Spectroscopy of Photoionized Clouds. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 41:517–554, 2003.

170 [23] Peng Y.-L.; Han X.-Y.; Wang M.-S.; Li J.-M. A theoretical study of dielectronic recombination processes of C2+ ions in planetary nebulae. Journal of Physics B, 38(21):3825–3839, 2005.

[24] Massey H.S.W; Bates D.R. The properties of neutral and ionized atomic oxygen and their inﬂuence on the upper atmosphere. Reports on Progress in Physics, 9(1):62–74, 1942.

[25] Bates D.R.; Massey H.S.W. The Negative Ions of Atomic and Molecular Oxygen. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 239(806):269–304, 1943.

[26] Burgess A. Delectronic recombination and the temperature of the solar corona. The Astrophysical Journal, 139:776–780, 1964.

[27] Goldberg L. In: Interstellar Ionized Hydrogen, Proceedings of NRAO-AIO H ii Region Symposium. W.A. Benjamin Inc., New York, 1968. [28] Seaton M.J. Quantum defect theory VII. Analysis of resonance structures. Journal of Physics B, 2(1):5–11, 1969.

[29] Davies P.C.W; Seaton M.J. Radiation damping in the optical continuum. Journal of Physics B, 2(7):757–765, 1969.

[30] Presnyakov L.P.; Urnov A.M. Asymptotic approach to the theory of excitation of multiply-charged ions by electron impact. Journal of Physics B, 8(8):1280–1288, 1975.

[31] Beigman I.L.; Chichkov B.N. Dielectronic recombination through the forbidden levels. Journal of Physics B, 13(3):565–569, 1980.

[32] Storey P.J. Dielectronic recombination at nebular temperatures. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 195:27P–31P, 1981.

[33] Nussbaumer H.; Storey P.J. Dielectronic recombination at low temperatures. Astronomy and astrophysics, 126(1):75–79, 1983.

[34] Bell R.H.; Seaton M.J. Dielectronic recombination. I. General theory. Journal of Physics B, 18(8):1589–1629, 1985.

[35] Harmin D.A. Precise Theory of Field Enhancement of Dielectronic Recom- bination. Physical Review Letters, 57(13):1570–1573, 1986.

[36] Nussbaumer H.; Storey P.J. Dielectronic recombination at low temperatures. IV. Recombination coeﬃcients for neon. Astronomy and Astrophysics Sup- plement Series, 69:123–133, 1987.

[37] Badnell N.R. Di-electronic recombination of He-like ions: Fe24+. Journal of Physics B, 19:1541–1552, 1986.

171 [38] Badnell N.R. Electron impact excitation of He. Journal of Physics B, 17(19):4013–4032, 1984.

[39] Badnell N.R. Dielectronic recombination of Fe22+ and Fe24+. Journal of Physics B, 19:3827–3835, 1986.

[40] Badnell N.R. Dielectronic recombination of Fe13+: benchmarking the M-shell. Journal of Physics B, 39(23):4825–4852, 2006.

[41] Badnell N.R. Autostructure writeup on the world wide web. URL: http://amdpp.phys.strath.ac.uk/autos/ver/WRITEUP. 2011. [42] LaGattuta K.; Nasser I.; Hahn Y. The eﬀect of static electric ﬁelds on dielectronic recombination: I. Basic theory. Journal of Physics B, 20(7):1565– 1576, 1987.

[43] Sakimoto K. Dielectronic recombination in electric ﬁelds: a quantum-defect theory approach. Journal of Physics B, 20(4):807–819, 1987.

[44] Nahar S.N.; Pradhan A.K. Uniﬁed treatment of electron-ion recombination in the close-coupling approximation. Physical Review A, 49(3):1816–1835, 1994.

[45] Nahar S.N.; Pradhan A.K. Uniﬁed Electron-Ion Recombination Rate Coef- ﬁcients of Silicon and Sulfur Ions. The Astrophysical Journal, 447:966–979, 1995.

[46] Leibowitz E.M. The emission spectrum of the ion C iv in planetary nebulae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 157:97–102, 1972.

[47] Leibowitz E.M. Polarization of C iv emission lines in planetary nebulae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 157:115–120, 1972.

[48] Balick B.; Gammon R.H.; Doherty L.H. The Structure of the Orion Nebula. I. Observations of the C 85α Recombination Line. The Astrophysical Journal, 188:45–52, 1974.

[49] Nussbaumer H.; Storey P.J. The Ionization Balance of C0 to C+4. Astronomy and astrophysics, 44:321–327, 1975.

[50] Nussbaumer H.; Storey P.J. Dielectronic recombination at low temperatures. II. Recombination coeﬃcients for lines of C, N, O. Astronomy and Astro- physics Supplement Series, 56:293–312, 1984.

[51] Boughton W.L. Carbon recombination lines and the neutral hydrogen clouds near the Orion Nebula. The Astrophysical Journal, 222:517–526, 1978.

[52] Harrington J.P.; Lutz J.H.; Seaton M.J.; Stickland D.J. Ultraviolet spectra of planetary nebulae - I. The abundance of carbon in IC 418. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 191:13–22, 1980.

172 [53] Clavel J.; Flower D.R.; Seaton M.J. Ultraviolet spectra of planetary nebulae. V - The C ii λ 1335 dielectronic recombination lines in IC 418. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 197:301–311, 1981.

[54] Clegg R.E.S.; Seaton M.J.; Peimbert M.; Torres-Peimbert S. Analysis of nebulosity in the planetary nebula NGC 40. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 205:417–434, 1983.

[55] Hayes M.A.; Nussbaumer H. The C ii infrared and ultraviolet lines. Astron- omy and Astrophysics, 134(1):193–197, 1984.

[56] Kholtygin A.F. Carbon Abundance in planetary nebulas. Astroﬁzika, 20(3):503–511, 1984.

[57] Kholtygin A.F. Inhomogeneous planetary nebulae: carbon and oxygen abundances. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 329:691–703, 1998.

[58] Bogdanovich P.O.; Nikitin A.A.; Rudzikas Z.B.; Kholtygin A.F. Lines of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen ions in the spectra of planetary nebulas. II - Intensities of the C ii and N iii recombination lines and abundances of the C iii and N iv ions. Astroﬁzika, 23(2):427–435, 1985. [59] Rola C.; Stasi´nska G. The carbon abundance problem in planetary nebulae. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 282(1):199–212, 1994.

[60] Davey A.R.; Storey P.J.; Kisielius R. Recombination coeﬃcients for C ii lines. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 142:85–94, 2000.

[61] Liu Y.; Liu X.-W.; Barlow M.J.; Luo S.-G. Chemical abundances of planetary nebulae from optical recombination lines - II. Abundances derived from collisionally excited lines and optical recombination lines. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 353(4):1251–1285, 2004.

[62] Peng Y.-L.; Wang M.-S.; Han X.-Y.; Li J.-M. Theoretic Study of C ii Re- combination Line. Chinese Physics Letters, 21(9):1723–1726, 2004.

[63] Liu X.-W.; Luo S.-G.; Barlow M.J.; Danziger I.J.; Storey P.J. Chemical abundances of planetary nebulae from optical recombination lines - III. The Galactic bulge PN M 1-42 and M 2-36. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society, 327(1):141–168, 2001.

[64] Sharpee B.; Baldwin J.A.; Williams R. Identiﬁcation and Characterization of Faint Emission Lines in the Spectrum of the Planetary Nebula IC 418. The Astrophysical Journal, 615(1):323–343, 2004.

[65] Flower D.R. Ultraviolet spectra of planetary nebulae. VIII - The C/O abundance ratio in the Ring nebula. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 199:15P–18P, 1982.

173 [66] Barker T. The ionization structure of planetary nebulae. VII. New observations of the Ring Nebula. The Astrophysical Journal, 322:922–929, 1987.

[67] Aller L.H.; Keyes C.D. The spectrum of NGC 7027 (367-650 nm). Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 85(8):2417–2421, 1988.

[68] Petitjean P.; Boisson C.; P´equignotD. A photoionization model study of the old nova shell DQ Herculis 1934. Astronomy and astrophysics, 240(2):433– 452, 1990.

[69] Liu X.-W.; Storey P.J.; Barlow M.J.; Clegg R.E.S. The rich O ii recombination spectrum of the planetary nebula NGC 7009: new observations and atomic data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 272(2):369– 388, 1995.

[70] Liu X.-W.; Storey P.J.; Barlow M.J.; Danziger I.J.; Cohen M.; Bryce M. NGC 6153: a super-metal-rich planetary nebula? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 312(3):585–628, 2000.

[71] Liu X.-W.; Barlow M.J.; Zhang Y.; Bastin R.J.; Storey P.J. Chemical abundances for Hf 2-2, a planetary nebula with the strongest-known heavy-element recombination lines. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 368(4):1959–1970, 2006.

[72] Esteban C.; Peimbert M.; Torres-Peimbert S.; Escalante V. Faint Emis- sion Lines in the Orion Nebula: C and O Abundances. Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astroﬁsica Serie de Conferencias, 3:241–244, 1995. The Fifth Mexico-Texas Conference on Astrophysics: Gaseous Nebulae and Star Formation, Tequesquitengo, Mor., Mexico, April 3-5.

[73] Esteban C.; Peimbert M.; Torres-Peimbert S.; Escalante V. Chemical composition of the Orion nebula derived from echelle spectrophotometry. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 295(2):401–422, 1998.

[74] Esteban C.; Peimbert M.; Torres-Peimbert S.; Rodr´ıguezM. Optical Recom- bination Lines of Heavy Elements in Giant Extragalactic H ii Regions. The Astrophysical Journal, 581(1):241–257, 2002.

[75] Esteban C.; Peimbert M.; Garc´ıa-Rojas J.; Ruiz M.T.; Peimbert A.; Rodr´ıguezM. A reappraisal of the chemical composition of the Orion nebula based on Very Large Telescope echelle spectrophotometry. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 355(1):229–247, 2004.

[76] Esteban C.; Bresolin F.; Peimbert M.; Garc´ıa-Rojas J.; Peimbert A.; Mesa- Delgado A. Keck HIRES Spectroscopy of Extragalactic H ii Regions: C and O Abundances from Recombination Lines. The Astrophysical Journal, 700(1):654–678, 2009.

174 [77] Garnett D.R.; Dinerstein H.L. Spatially Resolved O ii Recombination Line Observations of the Ring Nebula, NGC 6720. The Astrophysical Journal, 558(1):145–156, 2001.

[78] Bernard-Salas J.; Pottasch S.R.; Beintema D.A.; Wesselius P.R. The ISO- SWS spectrum of planetary nebula NGC 7027. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 367(3):949–958, 2001.

[79] Bernard-Salas J.; Pottasch S.R.; Feibelman W.A.; Wesselius P.R. An ISO and IUE study of planetary nebula NGC 2440. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 387(1):301–309, 2002.

[80] Bernard-Salas J.; Pottasch S.R.; Wesselius P.R.; Feibelman W.A. Abun- dances of Planetary Nebulae BD+30 3639 and NGC 6543. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 406(1):165–174, 2003.

[81] Bernard-Salas J.; Pottasch S.R.; Beintema D.A.; Wesselius P.R. Erratum The ISO-SWS spectrum of planetary nebula NGC7027. Astronomy and As- trophysics, 406(1):175, 2003.

[82] Peimbert A. The Chemical Composition of the 30 Doradus Nebula Derived from Very Large Telescope Echelle Spectrophotometry. The Astrophysical Journal, 584:735–750, 2003.

[83] Wesson R.; Liu X.-W.; Barlow M.J. Physical conditions in the planetary nebula Abell 30. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 340(1):253– 263, 2003.

[84] Wesson R.; Liu X.-W. Physical conditions in the planetary nebula NGC 6543. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 351(3):1026–1042, 2004.

[85] Wesson R.; Liu X-W.; Barlow M.J. The abundance discrepancy - recombination line versus forbidden line abundances for a northern sample of galactic planetary nebulae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 362(2):424–454, 2005.

[86] Wesson R.; Barlow M.J.; Liu X-W.; Storey P.J.; Ercolano B.; De Marco O. The hydrogen-deﬁcient knot of the ‘born-again’ planetary nebula Abell 58 (V605 Aql). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 383(4):1639– 1648, 2008.

[87] Tsamis Y.G.; Barlow M.J.; Liu X.-W.; Danziger I.J.; Storey P.J. Heavy elements in Galactic and Magellanic Cloud HII regions: recombination-line versus forbidden-line abundances. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 338(3):687–710, 2003.

[88] Tsamis Y.G.; Barlow M.J.; Liu X.-W.; Danziger I.J.; Storey P.J. A deep survey of heavy element lines in planetary nebulae - I. Observations and

175 forbidden-line densities, temperatures and abundances. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 345(1):186–220, 2003. [89] Tsamis Y.G.; Barlow M.J.; Liu X.-W.; Storey P.J.; Danziger I.J. A deep survey of heavy element lines in planetary nebulae - II. Recombination-line abundances and evidence for cold plasma. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 353(3):953–979, 2004. [90] Tsamis Y.G.; Walsh J.R.; PéquignotD.; Barlow M.J.; Danziger I.J.; Liu X.-W. Integral field spectroscopy of planetary nebulae: mapping the line diagnostics and hydrogen-poor zones with VLT FLAMES. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 386(1):22–46, 2008. [91] Ruiz M.Te.; Peimbert A.; Peimbert M.; Esteban C. Very Large Telescope Echelle Spectrophotometry of the Planetary Nebula NGC 5307 and Temper- ature Variations. The Astrophysical Journal, 595(1):247–258, 2003. [92] Garc´ıa-Rojas J.; Esteban C.; Peimbert M.; Rodr´ıguezM.; Ruiz M.T.; Pe- imbert A. Chemical Abundances of the Galactic H ii Region NGC 3576 Derived from Very Large Telescope Echelle Spectrophotometry. The Astro- physical Journal Supplement Series, 153(2):501–522, 2004. [93] Garc´ıa-Rojas J.; Esteban C.; Peimbert A.; Peimbert M.; Rodr´ıguezM.; Ruiz M.T. Deep echelle spectrophotometry of S 311, a Galactic H ii region located outside the solar circle. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 362(1):301–312, 2005. [94] Garc´ıa-Rojas J.; Esteban C.; Peimbert M.; Costado M.T.; Rodr´ıguezM.; Peimbert A.; Ruiz M.T. Faint emission lines in the Galactic H ii regions M16, M20 and NGC 3603. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 368(1):253–279, 2006. [95] Garc´ıa-Rojas J.; Esteban C.; Peimbert A.; Rodr´ıguezM.; Peimbert M.; Ruiz M.T. The chemical composition of the Galactic regions M8 and M17. A revision based on deep VLT echelle spectrophotometry. Revista Mexicana de Astronom´ıay Astrof´ısica, 43:3–31, 2007. [96] Ercolano B.; Wesson R.; Zhang Y.; Barlow M.J.; De Marco O.; Rauch T.; Liu X.-W. Observations and three-dimensional photoionization modelling of the Wolf-Rayet planetary nebula NGC 1501. Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 354(2):558–574, 2004. [97] Stasińska G.; GräfenerG.; Pena M.; Hamann W.-R.; Koesterke L.; Szczerba R. Comprehensive modelling of the planetary nebula LMC-SMP 61 and its [WC]-type central star . Astronomy and Astrophysics, 413(1):329–342, 2004. [98] Robertson-Tessi M.; Garnett D.R. Recombination line versus forbidden line abundances in planetary nebulae. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 157:371–395, 2005.

176 [99] Wang W.; Liu X.-W. Elemental abundances of Galactic bulge planetary nebulae from optical recombination lines. Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society, 381(2):669–701, 2007.

[100] Sharpee B.; Zhang Y.; Williams R.; Pellegrini E.; Cavagnolo K.; Baldwin J.A.; Phillips M.; X.-W. Liu. s-Process Abundances in Planetary Nebulae. The Astrophysical Journal, 659(2):1265–1290, 2007.

[101] Williams R.; Jenkins E.B.; Baldwin J.A.; Zhang Y.; Sharpee B.; Pellegrini E.; Phillips M. Independent Emission and Absorption Abundances for Plan- etary Nebulae. The Astrophysical Journal, 677(2):1100–1119, 2008.

[102] Eissner W.; Jones M.; Nussbaumer H. Techniques for the calculation of atomic structures and radiative data including relativistic corrections. Com- puter Physics Communications, 8(4):270–306, 1974.

[103] Nussbaumer H.; Storey P.J. The C iii transition probabilities. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 64(1-2):139–144, 1978.

[104] Berrington K.A.; Eissner W.B.; Norrington P.H. RMATRX1: Belfast atomic R-matrix codes. Computer Physics Communications, 92(2):290–420, 1995.

[105] Kisielius R.; Storey P.J.; Davey A.R.; Neale L.T. Recombination coeﬃcients for Ne ii lines at nebular temperatures and densities. Astronomy and Astro- physics Supplement, 133:257–269, 1998.

[106] Liu X.-W. Optical Recombination Lines and Temperature Fluctuations. Pro- ceedings of the Conference to Celebrate the 60th Birthdays of Silvia Torres- Peimbert and Manuel Peimbert, Mexico City, 12:70–76, 2002.

[107] Tsamis Y.G.; Walsh J.R.; P´equignotD.; Barlow M.J.; Liu X.-W.; Danziger I.J. Integral-ﬁeld Spectroscopy of Galactic Planetary Nebulae with VLT FLAMES. The Messenger, 127:53–57, 2007.

[108] Garnett D.R.; Dinerstein H.L. The O ii Recombination Line Abundance Problem in Planetary Nebulae. Revista Mexicana de Astronom´ıay Astrof´ısica (Serie de Conferencias), 10:13–18, 2001.

[109] Nicholls D.C.; Dopita M.A.; Sutherland R.S. Resolving the electron temperature discrepancies in H ii regions and planetary nebulae: κ-distributed electrons. The Astrophysical Journal, 752(2):148, 2012.

[110] Seaton M.J. Use of the R-matrix method for bound-state calculations: I. General theory. Journal of Physics B, 18(11):2111–2131, 1985.

[111] Berrington K.A.; Eissner W.B.; Saraph H.E.; Seaton M.J.; Storey P.J. A comparison of close-coupling calculations using UCL and QUB codes. Com- puter Physics Communications, 44(1-2):105–119, 1987.

177 [112] Berrington K.A.; Burke P.G.; Butler K.; Seaton M.J.; Storey P.J.; Tay- lor K.T.; Yu Yan. Atomic data for opacity calculations: II. Computational methods. Journal of Physics B, 20(23):6379–6397, 1987.

[113] Badnell N.R. RMATRX-I writeup on the world wide web. URL: http://amdpp.phys.strath.ac.uk/UK_RmaX/codes/serial/WRITEUP. 2009.

[114] Quigley L.; Berrington K.A.; Pelan J. The QB program: Analysing resonances using R-matrix theory. Computer Physics Communications, 114(1- 3):225–235, 1998.

[115] Hibbert A. CIV3 - A general program to calculate conﬁguration interaction wave functions and electric-dipole oscillator strengths. Computer Physics Communications, 9(3):141–172, 1075.

[116] Sochi T.; Storey P.J. Dielectronic Recombination Lines of C+. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables (Accepted), 2012.

[117] Nussbaumer H.; Storey P.J. C ii two-electron transitions. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 96(1-2):91–95, 1981.

[118] Yan Y.; Seaton M.J. Atomic data for opacity calculations. IV. Photoionisa- tion cross sections for C ii. Journal of Physics B, 20(23):6409–6429, 1987. [119] Benoy D.A.; Mullen J.A.M.; Schram D.C. Radiative energy loss in a non- equilibrium argon plasma. Journal of Physics D, 26(9):1408–1413, 1993.

[120] Seaton M.J.; Storey P.J. Di-electronic recombination. In: Atomic Processes and Applications; North-Holland Publishing Company, pages 133–197, 1976.

[121] Sochi T. Emissivity: A program for atomic transition calculations. Commu- nications in Computational Physics, 7(5):1118–1130, 2010.

[122] Hibbert A. Oscillator strengths of transitions in the beryllium sequence. Journal of Physics B, 7(12):1417–1434, 1974.

[123] Quigley L.; Berrington K.A. The QB method: analysing resonances using R-matrix theory. Applications to C+, He and Li. Journal of Physics B, 29(20):4529–4542, 1996.

[124] Stibbe D.T.; Tennyson J. TIMEDEL: A program for the detection and pa- rameterization of resonances using the time-delay matrix. Computer Physics Communications, 114(1-3):236–242, 1998.

[125] Bartschat K.; Burke P.G. Resﬁt - A multichannel resonance ﬁtting program. Computer Physics Communications, 41(1):75–84, 1986.

178 [126] Tennyson J.; Noble C.J. RESON-A program for the detection and ﬁtting of Breit-Wigner resonances. Computer Physics Communications, 33(4):421– 424, 1984.

[127] Stibbe D.T.; Tennyson J. Time-delay matrix analysis of resonances in electron − + scattering: e –H2 and H2 . Journal of Physics B, 29:4267–4283, 1996. [128] Smith F.T. Lifetime Matrix in Collision Theory. Physical Review, 118(1):349– 356, 1960.

[129] Berrington K.A.; Burke P.G.; Dufton P.L.; Kingston A.E. Electron collisional excitation of C iii and O V. Journal of Physics B, 10(8):1465–1475, 1977. [130] Eissner W.; Nussbaumer H. A programme for calculating atomic structures. Journal of Physics B, 2(10):1028–1043, 1969.

[131] Storey P.J. Recombination coeﬃcients for O ii lines at nebular temperatures and densities. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 282(3):999–1013, 1994.

[132] Lennon D.J.; Dufton P.L.; Hibbert A.; Kingston A.E. C ii emission lines formed in optically thin plasmas. The Astrophysical Journal, 294:200–206, 1985.

[133] Huber M.C.E.; Sandeman R.J.; Tozzi G.P. Branching Ratios of the 2s23p 2P0 Term of Singly-Ionized Carbon. Physica Scripta, T8:95–99, 1984.

[134] Glenzer S.; Kunze H.-J.; Musielok J.; Kim Y.-K.; Wiese W.L. Investigation of LS coupling in boronlike ions. Physical Review A, 49(1):221–227, 1994.

[135] Fang Z.; Kwong V.H.S.; Wang J. Measurements of radiative-decay rates of the 2s22p(2Po)-2s2p2(4P) intersystem transitions of C ii. Physical Review A, 48(2):1114–1122, 1993.

[136] Dankwort W.; Treﬀtz E. Breit-Pauli approximation for highly ionized boronlike ions, up to Fe XXII. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 65(1):93–98, 1978.

[137] Pottasch S.R.; Wesselius P.R.; van Duinen R.J. Ultraviolet observations of planetary nebulae. IV. The C iv lines at λ1550 A.˚ Astronomy and Astro- physics, 70:629–634, 1978.

[138] Nikitin A.A.; Sapar A.A.; Feklistove T.H.; Kholtygin A.F. Emission-line spectra and the abundance of carbon and nitrogen ions in planetary nebulae. Soviet Astronomy, 25(1):56–58, 1981.

[139] Bogdanovich P.O.; Lukoshiavichius R.A.; Nikitin A.A.; Rudzikas Z.B.; Kholtygin A.F. Lines of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen ions in the spectra of planetary nebulas. I. Transition probabilities and oscillator strengths. Astrophysics, 22(3):326–334, 1985.

179 [140] Adams S.; Seaton M.J. Ultraviolet spectra of planetary nebulae. VII - The abundance of carbon in the very low excitation nebula He 2-131. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 200:7P–12P, 1982.

[141] Clegg R.E.S.; Storey P.J.; Walsh J.R.; Neale L. Measurement of the 12C/13C ratio in planetary nebulae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety, 284(2):348–358, 1997.

[142] Storey P.J.; Sochi T. Electron Temperature of Planetary Nebulae from C ii Recombination Lines. Submitted, 2012.

[143] Nikitin A.A.; Yakubovskii O.A. The Investigation of the N iii Recombination Spectrum in Stellar Envelopes and Nebulae. VI. The Equations of Statistical Equilibrium for the Lower Excited Levels of C ii,N iii, and O iv. Soviet Astronomy, 7(2):189–198, 1963.

[144] Stanghellini L.; Shaw R.A.; Gilmore D. Space Telescope Imaging Spectro- graph Ultraviolet Spectra of Large Magellanic Cloud Planetary Nebulae: A Study of Carbon Abundances and Stellar Evolution. The Astrophysical Jour- nal, 622(1):294–318, 2005.

[145] Press W.H.; Teukolsky S.A.; Vetterling W.T.; Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes in C++ The Art of Scientiﬁc Computing. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2002.

[146] Illingworth V.; Clark J., editor. Collins Dictionary of Astronomy. Harper- Collins Publishers, 2000.

[147] Matzner R.A., editor. Dictionary of Geophysics, Astrophysics and Astron- omy. CRC Press, 2001.

[148] Tennyson J. Astronomical Spectroscopy: An Introduction to the Atomic and Molecular Physics of Astronomical Spectra. Imperial College Press, 1st edition, 2005.

[149] Mathis J.S.; Torres-Peimbert S.; Peimbert M. Temperature and Density Fluctuations in Planetary Nebulae. The Astrophysical Journal, 495(1):328– 336, 1998.

[150] McKenna F.C.; Keenan F.P.; Kaler J.B.; Wickstead A.W.; Bell K.L.; Ag- garwal K.M. [N ii] and [O iii] Mean Electron Temperatures in Planetary Nebulae. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Paciﬁc, 108:610– 614, 1996.

[151] Zhang Y.; Liu X.-W.; Wesson R.; Storey P.J.; Liu Y.; Danziger I.J. Electron temperatures and densities of planetary nebulae determined from the nebular hydrogen recombination spectrum and temperature and density variations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 351(3):935–955, 2004.

180 [152] Liu X-W. Optical recombination lines as probes of conditions in planetary nebulae. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union Symposium S234, 2:219–226, 2006.

[153] Peimbert M.; Peimbert A. Temperature Variations and Chemical Abun- dances in Planetary Nebulae. In Barlow M.J. and M´endezR.H., editors, Planetary Nebulae in our Galaxy and Beyond, Proceedings of the Interna- tional Astronomical Union Symposia and Colloquia No. 234, pages 227–234. Cambridge University Press, 2006.

[154] Liu X.-W.; Barlow M.J.; Cohen M.; Danziger I.J.; Luo S.-G.; Baluteau J.P.; Cox P.; Emery R.J.; Lim T.; P´equignotD. ISO LWS observations of planetary nebula ﬁne-structure lines. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 323(2):343–361, 2001.

[155] P´equignotD.; Baluteau J.P. The 680-1050 nm recombination spectrum of hydrogen and helium in the planetary nebula NGC 7027. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 206(2):298–315, 1988.

[156] van Hoof P.A.M.; Beintema D.A.; Verner D.A.; Ferland G.J. The collision strength of the [Ne V] infrared ﬁne-structure lines. Astronomy and Astro- physics, 354:L41–L44, 2000.

[157] Minkowski R. The Electron Temperature in the Planetary Nebula IC 418. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Paciﬁc, 65(384):161–162, 1953.

[158] Pottasch S.R.; Beintema D.A.; Raimond E.; Baud B.; van Duinen R.J.; Habing H.J.; Houck J.R.; de Jong T.; Jennings R.E.; Olnon F.M.; Wes- selius P.R. IRAS spectra of planetary nebulae. The Astrophysical Journal, 278:L33–L35, 1984.

[159] Phillips J.P.; Riera A.; Mampaso A. A carbon star outﬂow envelope about IC 418. Astrophysics and Space Science, 171(1-2):173–176, 1990.

[160] Hyung S.; Aller L.H.; Feibelman W.A. The spectrum of the planetary nebula IC 418. Astronomical Society of the Paciﬁc, 106(701):745–755, 1994.

[161] Pottasch S.R.; Bernard-Salas J.; Beintema D.A.; Feibelman W.A. Abun- dances of Planetary Nebulae IC 418, IC 2165 and NGC 5882. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 423(2):593–605, 2004.

[162] Seaton M.J. Electron temperatures and electron densities in planetary nebulae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 114:154–171, 1954.

[163] Kaler J.B. Hydrogen and Helium Spectra of Gaseous Nebulae. The Astro- physical Journal, vol. 143, p., 143:722–742, 1966.

181 [164] Le Marne A.E.; Shaver P.A. The electron temperature of the planetary nebula IC 418. Proceedings of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 1:216–217, 1969.

[165] Miller J.S. Planetary Nebulae. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astro- physics, 12:331–358, 1974.

[166] Aller L.H.; Keyes C.D.; Ross J.E.; O’Mara B.J. An analysis of the planetary nebula NGC 2867. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 197:647–658, 1981.

[167] Kaler J.B.; Jacoby G.H. Central star temperatures of optically thick planetary nebulae and a distance-independent test of dredge-up theory. The Astrophysical Journal, 345:871–880, 1989.

[168] Feibelman W.A. The Complex IUE Spectrum of the “O vi Sequence” Plan- etary Nebula NGC 2867. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 114(2):263–267, 1998.

[169] Bath G.T.; Evans W.D.; Pringle J.E. An oblique rotator model for DQ Herculis. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 166:113–121, 1974.

[170] Nelson M.R. Mass transfer in DQ Herculis. The Astrophysical Journal, 209:168–170, 1976.

[171] Gallagher J.S.; Hege E.K.; Kopriva D.A.; Butcher H.R.; Williams R.E. Spec- trophotometry of the nebula surrounding nova T Aurigae 1891. The Astro- physical Journal, 237:55–60, 1980.

[172] Ferland G.J. On the distance and luminosity of nova DQ Herculis. The Observatory, 100:166–167, 1980.

[173] Itoh H. Physical Conditions in the Shell around the Old Nova DQ Herculis 1934. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 33:743–747, 1981.

[174] King A.R. The origin of soft X-ray pulsations in dwarf novae at outburst and the DQ Herculis phenomenon. Nature, 313:291–292, 1985.

[175] Canalle J.B.G.; Opher R. The accretion column of DQ Herculis binaries. Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astroﬁsica, 21:433–436, 1990.

[176] Smits D.P. Low-temperature recombination coeﬃcients and nova-shell abundances. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 248:193–216, 1991.

[177] Kraft R.P. The Binary System Nova DQ Herculis. II. An Interpretation of the Spectrum during the Eclipse Cycle. The Astrophysical Journal, 130:110–122, 1959.

182 [178] Starrﬁeld S.G. The Rate of Mass Exchange in DQ Herculis. The Astrophysical Journal, 161:361–363, 1970.

[179] Saito R.K.; Baptista R.; Horne K.; Martell P. Spectral Mapping of the Intermediate Polar DQ Herculis. The Astronomical Journal, 139(6):2542– 2556, 2010.

[180] Williams R.E.; Woolf N.J.; Hege E.K.; Moore R.L.; Kopriva D.A. The shell around nova DQ Herculis 1934. The Astrophysical Journal, 224:171–181, 1978.

[181] Gallagher J.S.; Starrﬁeld S. Theory and Observations of Classical Novae. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16:171–214, 1978.

[182] I.S. Webster B.L.; Glass. The coolest Wolf-Rayet stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 166:491–497, 1974.

[183] Thackeray A.D. The red/infrared spectrum of CPD - 56◦8032. The Obser- vatory, 97:165–169, 1977.

[184] Houziaux L.; Heck A. Carbon abundance in the WC 11 star CPD - 56◦8032. In: Wolf-Rayet stars: Observations, physics, evolution; Proceedings of the Symposium, Cozumel, Mexico, September 18-22, 1981, pages 139–145, 1982.

[185] Pollacco D.L.; Kilkenny D.; Marang F.; van Wyk F.; Roberts G. The dis- covery of photometric variations in the prototype WC11 star CPD - 56◦8032. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 256(4):669–672, 1992.

[186] Crowther P.A.; De Marco O.; Barlow M.J.; Storey P.J. A quantitative analysis of the prototype [WCL] star CPD - 56◦8032. Astrophysics and Space Science, 238(1):119–123, 1996.

[187] Cohen M.; Barlow M.J.; Sylvester R.J.; Liu X.-W.; Cox P.; Lim T.; Schmitt B.; Speck A.K. Silicate and ice emission bands in the ISO spectrum of the PAH-emitting carbon-rich planetary nebula CPD - 56◦8032. In: Proceedings of the 191st Symposium of the International Astronomical Union, Montpel- lier, France, 27 August to 1 September, 1998, pages 291–296, 1999.

[188] Cohen M.; Barlow M.J.; Sylvester R.J.; Liu X.-W.; Cox P.; Lim T.; Schmitt B.; Speck A.K. Water Ice, Silicate, and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocar- bon Emission Features in the Infrared Space Observatory Spectrum of the Carbon-rich Planetary Nebula CPD - 56◦8032. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 513(2):L135–L138, 1999.

[189] Cohen M.; Barlow M.J.; Liu X.-W.; Jones A.F. The dual dust chemistries of planetary nebulae with [WCL] central stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 332(4):879–890, 2002.

183 [190] De Marco O.; Jones A.F.; Barlow M.J.; Cohen M.; Bond H.E.; Harmer D. The dual dust chemistry - Binarity connection. In: ASP Conference Series, Asymmetric Planetary Nebulae III, 313:100–103, 2004.

[191] Chesneau O. High spatial resolution study of the inner environment around two young planetary nebulae. In: ASP Conference Series, Stars with the B[e] Phenomenon, 355:117–123, 2006.

[192] Chesneau O.; Collioud A.; De Marco O.; Wolf S.; Lagadec E.; Zijlstra A.A.; Rothkopf A.; Acker A.; Clayton G.C.; Lopez B. A close look into the carbon disk at the core of the planetary nebula CPD - 56◦8032. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 455(3):1009–1018, 2006.

[193] De Marco O.; Barlow M.J.; Storey P.J. The winds of WC10 central stars of planetary nebulae. Astrophysics and Space Science, 238(1):91–96, 1996.

[194] De Marco O.; Storey P.J.; Barlow M.J. A method for the direct determination of the wind electron temperature of WC10 central stars of planetary nebulae. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Colloquium on Hydrogen-Deﬁcient Stars, Bamberg, Germany, 28 August to 1 September, 1995, 96:145–148, 1996.

[195] Rao N.K. Nebular spectrum of CPD - 56◦8032 and He 2-113. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 28:261–263, 1987.

[196] N.K.; Giridhar S.; Nandy K. Rao. The UV spectrum of the WC 11 star CPD - 56◦8032. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 234(1-2):410–418, 1990.

[197] Crowther P.A.; Hillier D.J.; Smith L.J. Fundamental parameters of Wolf- Rayet stars. I. Ofpe/WN9 stars. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 293:172–197, 1995.

[198] De Marco O.; Barlow M.J. Abundances of [WC] central stars and their planetary nebulae. Astrophysics and Space Science, 275(1-2):53–66, 2001.

[199] Cohen M. Infrared observations of southern WC9 stars and He 2-113. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 173:489–496, 1975.

[200] Sahai R.; Nyman L.-A.;˚ Wootten A. He 2-113: A multipolar planetary nebula with rings around a cool wolf-rayet star. The Astrophysical Journal, 543(2):880–888, 2000.

[201] Soker N. Formation of Double Rings around Evolved Stars. The Astrophysical Journal, 577(2):839–844, 2002.

[202] Lagadec E.; Chesneau O.; Matsuura M.; De Marco O.; de Freitas Pacheco J.A.; Zijlstra A.A.; Acker A.; Clayton G.C.; Lopez B. New insights on the complex planetary nebula Hen 2-113. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 448(1):203–212, 2006.

184 [203] Bryans P. On the Spectral Emission of Non-Maxwellian Plasmas. PhD thesis, University of Strathclyde, 2005.

+ [204] Sochi T.; Tennyson J. A computed line list for the H2D molecular ion. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 405(4):2345–2350, 2010.

+ [205] Dalgarno A.; Herbst E.; Novick S.; Klemperer W. Radio Spectrum of H2D . The Astrophysical Journal, 183:L131–L133, 1973.

+ [206] Amano T.; Watson J.K.G. Observation of the ν1 fundamental band of H2D . Journal of Chemical Physics, 81(7):2869–2871, 1984. [207] Bogey M.; Demuynck C.; Denis M.; Destombes J.L.; Lemoine B. Laboratory + measurement of the 110 − 111 submillimeter line of H2D . Astronomy and Astrophysics, 137:L15–L16, 1984. [208] F´arn´ık M.; Davis S.; Kostin M.A.; Polyansky O.L.; Tennyson J.; Nes- bitt D.J. Beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation: High-resolution + + overtone spectroscopy of H2D and D2H . Journal of Chemical Physics, 116(14):6146–6158, 2002. [209] Millar T.J. Deuterium Fractionation in Interstellar Clouds. Space Science Reviews, 106:73–86, 2003. [210] van Dishoeck E.F.; Phillips T.G.; Keene J.; Blake G.A. Ground-based + searches for interstellar H2D . Astronomy and Astrophysics, 261(1):L13–L16, 1992. [211] Phillips T.G.; Blake G.A.; Keene J.; Woods R.C.; Churchwell E. Interstellar + + H3 : Possible detection of the 110 −111 transition of H2D . The Astrophysical Journal, 294:L45–L48, 1985. [212] Pagani L.; Wannier P.G.; Frerking M.A.; Kuiper T.B.H.; Gulkis S.; Zim- mermann P.; Encrenaz P.J.; Whiteoak J.B.; Destombes J.L.; Pickett H.M. + Search for H2D at 372 GHz in dense interstellar clouds. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 258(2):472–478, 1992.

+ [213] Boreiko R.T.; Betz A.L. A search for the rotational transitions of H2D at + 1370 GHz and H3O at 985 GHz. The Astrophysical Journal, 405(1):L39– L42, 1993. [214] Stark R.; van der Tak F.F.S.; van Dishoeck E.F. Detection of Interstellar + H2D Emission. The Astrophysical Journal, 521:L67–L70, 1999.

+ [215] Caselli P.; van der Tak F.F.S.; Ceccarelli C.; Bacmann A. Abundant H2D in the pre-stellar core L1544. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 403(3):L37–L41, 2003.

+ [216] Vastel C.; Phillips T.G.; Yoshida H. Detection of D2H in the Dense Inter- stellar Medium. The Astrophysical Journal, 606:L127–L130, 2004.

185 + [217] Ceccarelli C.; Dominik C.; Leﬂoch B.; Caselli P.; Caux E. Detection of H2D : Measuring the Midplane Degree of Ionization in the Disks of DM Tauri and TW Hydrae. The Astrophysical Journal, 607:L51–L54, 2004.

[218] Stark R.; Sandell G.; Beck S.C.; Hogerheijde M.R.; van Dishoeck E.F.; van der Wal P.; van der Tak F.F.S.; Sch¨aferF.; Melnick G.J.; Ashby M.L.N.; de Lange G. Probing the Early Stages of Low-Mass Star Formation in LDN 1689N: Dust and Water in IRAS 16293-2422A, B, and E. The Astrophysical Journal, 608:341–364, 2004.

[219] Hogerheijde M.R.; Caselli P.; Emprechtinger M.; van der Tak F.F.S.; Alves J.; Belloche A.; ¨ustenR.G.; Lundgren A.A.; Nyman L.-A.;˚ Volgenau N.; + Wiedner M.C. Probable detection of H2D in the starless core Barnard 68. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 454(2):L59–L62, 2006.

[220] Harju J.; Haikala L.K.; Lehtinen K.; Juvela M.; Mattila K.; Miettinen O.; + Dumke M.; G¨ustenR.; Nyman L.-A.˚ Detection of H2D in a massive prestellar core in Orion B. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 454(2):L55–L58, 2006.

[221] Cernicharo J.; Polehampton E.; Goicoechea J.R. Far-Infrared Detection of + H2D toward Sgr B2. The Astrophysical Journal, 657:L21–L24, 2007. [222] Caselli P.; Vastel C.; Ceccarelli C.; van der Tak F.F.S.; Crapsi A.; Bac- + mann A. Survey of ortho-H2D (11,0 − 11,1) in dense cloud cores. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 492(3):703–718, 2008.

+ [223] Ramos A.A.; Ceccarelli C.; Elitzur M. H2D line emission in Proto-Planetary Disks. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 471(1):187–192, 2007.

[224] van der Tak F.F.S.; Caselli P.; Ceccarelli C. Line proﬁles of molecular ions toward the pre-stellar core LDN 1544. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 439(1):195–203, 2005.

+ [225] Ceccarelli C.; Dominik C. H2D : A Light on Baryonic Dark Matter? The Astrophysical Journal, 640:L131–L134, 2006.

[226] Herbst E.; Millar T.J. The Chemistry of Cold Interstellar Cloud Cores: Low Temperatures and Cold Molecules. World Scientiﬁc Publishing, 2008.

[227] Shy J.-T.; Farley J.W.; Wing W.H. Observation of the infrared spectrum of + the triatomic molecular ion H2D . Physical Review A, 24:1146–1149, 1981. [228] Warner H.E.; Conner W.T.; Petrmichl R.H.; Woods R.C. Laboratory detec- + tion of the 110 − 111 submillimeter wave transition of the H2D ion. Journal of Chemical Physics, 81(5):2514, 1984.

[229] Dubrovich V.K. Blurring of spatial microwave background ﬂuctuations by molecular line scattering. Astronomy Letters, 19(1):53–54, 1993.

186 [230] Dubrovich V.K.; Lipovka A.A. Distortions of the cosmic blackbody spec- + trum due to luminescence of H2D molecules. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 296:301–306, 1995.

[231] Dubrovich V.; Partridge B. Line and continuum emission from high red- shift objects and proto-objects. Astronomical and Astrophysical Transac- tions, 19:233–251, 2000.

[232] Galli D.; Palla F. The chemistry of the early Universe. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 335:403–420, 1998.

[233] Schleicher D.R.G.; Galli D.; Palla F.; Camenzind M.; Klessen R.S.; Bartel- mann M.; Glover S.C.O. Eﬀects of primordial chemistry on the cosmic microwave background. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 490(2):521–535, 2008.

[234] Miller S.; Tennyson J.; Sutcliﬀe B.T. First principles calculation of rotational + + and ro-vibrational line strengths Spectra for H2D and D2H . Molecular Physics, 66(2):429–456, 1989.

[235] Dinelli B.M.; Neale L.; Polyansky O.L.; Tennyson J. New Assignments for the + Infrared Spectrum of H3 . Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 181(1):142–150, 1997.

[236] Amano T. Diﬀerence-frequency laser spectroscopy of molecular ions with a + hollow-cathode cell: extended analysis of the ν1 band of H2D . Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 2(5):790–793, 1985.

[237] Foster S.C.; McKellar A.R.W.; Peterkin I.R.; Watson J.K.G.; Pan F.S.; Crofton M.W.; Altman R.S.; Oka T. Observation and analysis of the ν2 + and ν3 fundamental bands of the H2D ion. Journal of Chemical Physics, 84(1):91–99, 1986.

[238] Amano T.; Hirao T. Accurate rest frequencies of submillimeter-wave lines of + + H2D and D2H . Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 233(1):7–14, 2005. [239] Hlavenka P.; Korolov I.; PlaˇsilR.; Varju J.; Kotr´ıkT.; Glos´ık.

[240] Yonezu T.; Matsushima F.; Moriwaki Y.; Takagi K.; Amano T. THz spec- + troscopy of H2D . Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 256(2):238–241, 2009. [241] Vastel C.; Caselli P.; Ceccarelli C.; Phillips T.; Wiedner M.C.; Peng R.; + Houde M.; Dominik C. The Distribution of Ortho-H2D (110 − 111) in L1544: Tracing the Deuteration Factory in Prestellar Cores. The Astrophysical Jour- nal, 645:1198–1211, 2006.

[242] Vastel C.; Phillips T.G.; Caselli P.; Ceccarelli C.; Pagani L. Deuterium + enhancement in H3 in pre-stellar cores. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 364(1848):3081–3090, 2006.

187 [243] Polyansky O.L.; Tennyson J. Ab initio calculation of the rotation-vibration + energy levels of H3 and its isotopomers to spectroscopic accuracy. Journal of Chemical Physics, 110(11):5056–5064, 1999.

[244] Tennyson J.; Kostin M.A.; Barletta P.; Harris G.J.; Polyansky O.L.; Raman- lal J.; Zobov N.F. DVR3D: a program suite for the calculation of rotation- vibration spectra of triatomic molecules. Computer Physics Communications, 163(2):85–116, 2004.

[245] Polyansky O.L.; Cs´asz´arA.G.; Shirin S.V.; Zobov N.F.; Barletta P.; Ten- nyson J.; Schwenke D.W.; Knowles P.J. High accuracy ab initio rotation- vibration transitions of water. Science, 299:539–542, 2003.

[246] Polyansky O.L.; Prosmiti R.; Klopper W.; Tennyson J. An accurate, global, + ab initio potential energy surface for the H3 molecule. Molecular Physics, 98(5):261–273, 2000.

[247] Cencek W.; Rychlewski J.; Jaquet R.; Kutzelnigg W. Sub-micro-Hartree + accuracy potential energy surface for H3 including adiabatic and relativistic eﬀects. I. Calculation of the potential points. Journal of Chemical Physics, 108:2831–2836, 1998.

[248] Schinke R.; Dupuis M.; Lester Jr. W.A. Proton-H2 scattering on an ab initio CI potential energy surface. I. Vibrational excitation at 10 eV. Journal of Chemical Physics, 72(7):3909–3915, 1980.

[249] Tennyson J.; Sutcliffe B.T. The ab initio calculation of the vibration-rotation spectrum of triatomic systems in the close-coupling approach with KCN and H2Ne as examples. Journal of Chemical Physics, 77(8):4061–4072, 1982. [250] Tennyson J.; Sutcliffe B.T. Variationally exact ro-vibrational levels of the + floppy CH2 molecule. Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 101(1):71–82, 1983. [251] Pavanello M.; Adamowicz L.; Alijah A.; Zobov N.F.; Mizus I.I.; Polyansky O.L.; Tennyson J.; Szidarovszky T.; CsászárA.G. Calibration-quality adi- + abatic potential energy surfaces for H3 and its isotopologues. Journal of Chemical Physics, 136(18):184303–184316, 2012.

[252] R¨ohseR.; Kutzelnigg W.; Jaquet R.; Klopper W. Potential energy surface of + the H3 ground state in the neighborhood of the minimum with microhartree accuracy and vibrational frequencies derived from it. Journal of Chemical Physics, 101(3):2231–2243, 1994.

[253] Barber R.J.; Tennyson J.; Harris G.J.; Tolchenov R.N. A high-accuracy computed water line list. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 368(3):1087–1094, 2006.

188 + [254] Polyansky O.L.; Miller S.; Tennyson J. Rotational Levels of H2D : Vari- ational Calculations and Assignments. Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 157(1):237–247, 1993.

+ [255] Miller S.; Stallard T.; Melin H.; Tennyson J. H3 cooling in planetary atmo- spheres. Faraday Discussions, 147:283–291, 2010.

[256] Tennyson J.; Miller S.; Le Sueur C.R. TRIATOM: programs for the calculation of ro-vibrational spectra of triatomic molecules. Computer Physics Communications, 75:339–364, 1993.

189 Appendix A

Using Lifetime Matrix to Investigate Single- Channel Resonances

In this Appendix we present the K-matrix method of P.J. Storey which is based on using the lifetime matrix M expressed in terms of the reactance matrix K to investigate single-channel resonances. This method is used in this study to investigate the low-lying autoionizing states of C+. According to Smith [128], the M-matrix is given, in terms of the scattering matrix S, by

∗ dS M = −i ~ S (A.1) dE where S-matrix is deﬁned, in terms of K-matrix, by

I + iK S = (A.2) I − iK with I being the identity matrix. In the case of single-channel states, M, S and K are one-element matrices. To indicate this fact we annotate them with M, S and K. From A.1 and A.2, the following relation may be derived

2 dK M = (A.3) 1 + K2 dE

190 where ~ = 1 in atomic units. It is noteworthy that since K is real, M is real as it should be.

Smith [128] has demonstrated that the expectation value of M is the lifetime of the state, τ. Now if K has a simple pole at energy E0, given by

g K = (A.4) E − E0 where g is a parameter with dimensions of energy, then from A.3 we obtain

−2g ( ) = M E 2 2 (1 + K )(E − E0) −2g = (A.5) 2 2 (E − E0) + g

and hence the maximum value of M(E) is M(E0) = −2/g. On substituting the half maximum, −1/g, into Equation A.5 we ﬁnd

E − E0 = ±g (A.6) and therefore, the full width at half maximum is

∆E = |2g| (A.7)

According to Smith [128], the lifetime of the state τ, and the FWHM ∆E are related by 1 τ = (au) (A.8) ∆E

Hence, for a K-matrix pole given by A.4 the autoionization probability, Γa, which by deﬁnition equals the reciprocal of the lifetime, is given in atomic units by

1 Γa = = ∆ = |2g| (au) (A.9) τ E

191 Now if we consider a K-matrix with a pole superimposed on a background Ko

g K = Ko + (A.10) E − E0 then from A.3 we ﬁnd

−2g ( ) = M E 2 2 (1 + K )(E − E0) −2g = (A.11) 2 2 2 (1 + Ko )(E − E0) + 2Ko g(E − E0) + g

The maximum value of M(E) occurs when the denominator has a minimum, that is when K g = − o (A.12) E E0 2 1 + Ko and hence 2(1 + K2) M = − o (A.13) max g

This reveals that by including a non-vanishing background the peak of M is shifted relative to the pole position, E = E0, and the peak value is modiﬁed. If we now

1 calculate the FWHM, ∆E, by locating the energies where M = 2 Mmax from solving the quadratic

g2(1 − K2) (1 + 2)( − )2 + 2 g(E − E ) − o = 0 (A.14) Ko E E0 Ko 0 2 (1 + Ko ) we ﬁnd |2g| ∆ = (A.15) E 2 1 + Ko As FWHM and autoionization probability are numerically equal in atomic units, we obtain |2g| Γa = (au) (A.16) 2 1 + Ko

192 The two parameters of primary interest are the resonance position Er and the resonance width ∆r. However, for an energy point Ei with a K-matrix value Ki,

Equation A.10 has three unknowns, Ko , g and E0 which are needed to ﬁnd Er and ∆r, and hence three energy points at the immediate neighborhood of E0 are required to identify the unknowns. Since the K-matrix changes sign at the pole, the neighborhood of E0 is located by testing the K-matrix value at each point of the energy mesh for sign change and hence the three points are obtained accordingly.

Now, if we take the three consecutive values of K

g Ki = Ko + (i = 1, 2, 3) (A.17) Ei − E0 and deﬁne

∆Ejk = Ej − Ek & ∆Kjk = Kj − Kk (A.18) then from A.17 we obtain

1 1 ∆E21 ∆K12 = g − = g (A.19) ∆E10 ∆E20 ∆E10∆E20

1 1 ∆E32 ∆K23 = g − = g (A.20) ∆E20 ∆E30 ∆E20∆E30 and ∆K ∆E ∆E 12 = 30 21 (A.21) ∆K23 ∆E10∆E32

Therefore ∆E E − E ∆K ∆E 30 = 3 0 = 12 32 (A.22) ∆E10 E1 − E0 ∆K23∆E21

On algebraically manipulating A.22 we ﬁnd

E1∆K12∆E32 − E3∆K23∆E21 E0 = (A.23) ∆K12∆E32 − ∆K23∆E21

193 Having located the pole position, E0, the following relation can be obtained from A.19 ∆K ∆E ∆E g = 12 10 20 (A.24) ∆E21

Similarly, from A.17 we obtain

g Ko = K1 − (A.25) ∆E10

Finally, Er and ∆r can be computed from Equation A.12 and Equation A.15 respectively.

194 Appendix B

Error Analysis

In this Appendix we present the formulae of P.J. Storey to account for the errors in the observational data used in the least squares optimization method where the flux of each line is normalized to the total flux of all lines involved in the optimization process. In the following we define the symbols used in these formulae

fi is the observed ﬂux of line i f is the sum of observed ﬂux of all N lines involved in the least squares process

O fi yi = f C yi is the ratio of the theoretical emissivity of line i to the sum of the theoretical emissivity of all N lines

2 O σ O is the variance of the observed ratio yi yi

σfi is the standard deviation of the observed flux of line i In the following, we adopt a basic definition of χ2 based on a least squares difference and a statistical weight given by the reciprocal of variance, and hence other factors that may enter in the definition of χ2, such as scaling factors like degrees of freedom, are not included for the sake of simplicity. The method therefore is based on minimizing χ2 given by

195 N O C 2 2 X yi − yi χ = 2 (B.1) σ O i=1 yi

O From the deﬁnition of yi it can be shown that

O 2 O 2 2 2 2 ∂yi 2 ∂yi 2 1 2 fi 2 σ O = σ + σ = σ + − σ (B.2) y fi f fi 2 f i ∂fi ∂f f f

O2 Dividing through by yi we get

2 2 2 1 2 fi 2 σ O f σfi f 2 σf yi 2 = 2 + 2 (B.3) O f f (yi ) i i f f

that is

σ2 σ2 2 O2 fi f σ O = yi + (B.4) yi 2 2 fi f

Now, since fi’s are mutually independent

N 2 N X ∂f X σ2 = σ2 = σ2 (B.5) f ∂f fj fj j j j On substituting, we obtain

N ! σ2 P σ2 2 O2 fi j fj σ O = yi + (B.6) yi 2 2 fi f

In the following, we investigate three types of error.

B.1 Observed Error

In this case, Equation B.6 should be used as it stands where σfi and σfj are the errors given by the observer as standard deviations on the observed ﬂux of lines i and j respectively.

196 B.2 Fixed Percentage Error

If we assume a constant percentage error on the ﬂux of all lines, that is

σfi = γfi (B.7)

then from Equation B.6 we obtain

2 PN 2 ! 2 O2 2 fi 2 j fj σ O = yi γ + γ (B.8) yi 2 2 fi f

that is

PN 2 ! 2 O2 2 j fj σyO = yi γ 1 + (B.9) i f 2

B.3 Poisson Error

Now if we assume, based on Poisson counting statistics, that the error on the observed ﬂux is proportional to the square root of ﬂux, i.e.

2 = (B.10) σfi βfi

where β is an unknown proportionality factor with the same dimensionality as fi, then equation B.6 becomes

2 2 fi 1 1 O = + (B.11) σy β 2 i f fi f

that is

2 βfi fi σyO = 1 + (B.12) i f 2 f

Since β is unknown, χ2 may be normalized to its value at the minimum to

197 obtain a more realistic error estimate.

198 Appendix C

Emissivity Program Documentation

‘Emissivity’ code is a command line program that was developed during this investigation to implement the atomic transition and emissivity model. Its main functionality is to find all possible transitions and calculate the emissivity and recombination coefficients of the transition lines from dielectronic recombination and cascade decay all the way down to the ground or a metastable state, that is all free-free, free-bound and bound-bound transitions. ‘Emissivity’ is written in C++ computer language and mixes procedural with object oriented programming. The program was compiled successfully with no errors or warnings using Dev-C++ compiler on Windows, and g++ compiler on Cygwin and Red Hat Linux. Sample results produced by these three versions were compared and found to be identical. Elaborate checks were carried out in all stages of writing and debugging the program and the output was verified. Thorough independent checks on sample emissivity data produced by ‘Emissivity’ were performed and found to be consistent.

199 C.1 Theoretical background

In thermodynamic environments, an excited atomic state is populated by recombination and radiative decay from accessible higher states, and depopulated by autoionization and radiative decay to lower states. The population of a resonance state is, therefore, determined by the balance between recombination, autoionization and radiative decay. In thermodynamic equilibrium situations, autoionization dominates and the population is described by Saha equation. In non- thermodynamic equilibrium situations, processes other than autoionization have significant contribution to the population and hence detailed equilibrium calculations are required to account for these processes. In these situations, a departure coefficient, defined as the ratio of autoionization probability to the sum of autoionization and total radiative probabilities, is used to measure the departure from thermodynamic equilibrium and quantify the contribution of various processes. The first step in the transition lines calculations is to find the radiative transition probabilities of all types of transitions (free-free, free-bound and bound-bound) which, for a given photon energy and statistical weights of the upper and lower states, can be obtained from the oscillator strengths. The total radiative transition probability of each state can then be obtained by summing up the transition probabilities of the given state to all optically-accessible lower states. The population of all states can then be computed. For autoionizing states, the population is obtained by summing up the Saha capture term, given by Saha population times the departure coefficient, and the radiative decay term given by the sum over all accessible upper states of the population of these states times the ratio of the radiative probability of the transition to the sum of total radiative and autoionizing probabilities of the lower state. For bound states, the population is simply computed by summing up over all accessible upper states the population of these states times the ratio of the radiative probability of the transition to the total radiative

200 probability of the lower state. On ﬁnding all optically-allowed transitions, the emissivity of lines arising from these transitions can be obtained from

r εul = NuΓulEp (C.1) while the equivalent eﬀective recombination coeﬃcient is computed from

εul %f = (C.2) NeNiEp

r In the last equations, Nu is the population of upper state, Γul is the radiative transition probability from upper to lower state, Ep is the photon energy, and Ne and Ni are the number density of electrons and ions respectively. This theoretical model, with some other extensions and elaborations, represent the basic framework of ‘Emissivity’ code [121] which was the main tool used by the author of this thesis to perform the calculations of dielectronic recombination transition lines using the raw atomic data generated mainly by R-matrix and Autostructure programs. The ‘Emissivity’ calculations include identifying the allowed electric dipole transitions, vacuum and air wavelengths, radiative transition probabilities, dimensional and normalized emissivities, eﬀective recombination co- eﬃcients, decay routes, and so on. The code can also perform comparison to observational data and analyze the results using a least squares optimization procedure. Moreover, it can produce electron energy distribution for the FF and FB transitions of the observed spectra. Some practical details about these calculations and how to be performed by ‘Emissivity’ will be highlighted in the subsequent sections of this appendix.

201 C.2 Input and Output Files

‘Emissivity’ code reads from plain text input files and writes the results to a main plain text output file called ‘Transitions’. The structure of this output file is explained in section C.2.4. Other secondary output data files are also produced for particular purposes. The required input text files are ‘Input’, ‘ResEmis’, ‘ELEVEmis’ and ‘FVALUE’. The structure of these files, apart from the ‘FVALUE’ file which is produced by the STGBB stage of the R-matrix code and is used by ‘Emissivity’ program with no modification, apart from possible inclusion of ad- ditional data, is outlined below. Two other input data files are also required if comparison and analysis to observational data are needed. One of these is a data file that contains astronomical observations while the other includes mapping information of the observational lines to their theoretical counterparts using their indices. In the following subsections we outline the files used by the ‘Emissivity’ code for input and output.

C.2.1 ‘Input’ Data File

The program uses a keyword based input file called ‘Input’ which controls the program flow and its main parameters. All keywords are optional with no order required. If keywords are omitted, default values will be used. Comments can be inserted in any part of the input file as long as they do not intrude between a keyword and its parameter(s) or between the parameters. No commentary line should be initiated with a keyword. Each keyword must occur first on its line of text followed by its parameter(s) in the order that will be given. There is no restriction on using spaces and new lines as long as they obey the aforementioned rules.

1. ‘Temperature(K)’

202 The first entry after this keyword is a boolean flag to choose one of the two available schemes, followed by the number of temperature entries in K. If the flag is on (i.e. ‘1’), this must be followed by the initial temperature and the interval between the temperature points in this order; and if it is off, it should be followed by the temperature points. The first scheme is most suitable for a large and regularly spaced temperature vector, while the second is more suitable for small or irregularly spaced temperature vector. If this keyword is omitted, the default is a single temperature entry of 10000.

2. ‘Ni(mˆ -3)’

This is the number density of the ions in m−3. If this keyword is omitted, the default value is 1010.

3. ‘Ne(mˆ -3)’

This is the number density of the electrons in m−3. If this keyword is omitted, the default value is 1010.

4. ‘ResidualCharge’

This is the residual charge of the ion. It is required for scaling some of the data obtained from the R-matrix code output ﬁles. If this keyword is omitted, the default value is 2.

5. ‘AstronomicalData’

This keyword requires a boolean flag to read astronomical data from a data file (‘0’ for ‘No’ and ‘1’ for ‘Yes’). If the flag is on, a second entry, which is the name of the data file to read the data from, will be required. The structure of the astronomical data file requires the file to start with a comment that can occupy any number

203 of text lines but it should be terminated with ‘EndOfComment’ string to mark the end. This should be followed by the transition lines data organized in sets preferably each set on a single line of text. When the normalization is on, as will be explained later on, the program will normalize the astronomical data to the first data set. This facilitates the normalization as the user can simply normalize to any line in the astronomical data by copying the data of that line and paste at the front. The data for each line usually consist of the observed and laboratory wavelengths, the observed flux (normally after correcting for dust extinction and normalizing such that I(Hβ) = 100), the observed error (standard deviation as percentage), the ionic identification, the type of transition (FF, FB or BB), the lower spectral term of the transition, the upper spectral term of the transition, the statistical weight of the lower level, and the statistical weight of the upper level. There is another option for normalization that is normalizing the observational fluxes to the total flux and the theoretical emissivities to the total emissivity. If the user chooses to read astronomical data, the data lines will be inserted between the theoretical lines in the ‘Transitions’ output file according to their observed wavelength. If this keyword is omitted, the default value is 0.

6. ‘TestsFlag’

This keyword requires one entry which is a flag for carrying the first (in-out) and second (ground-metastable) consistency tests. These tests are described in section C.3 of this appendix. The options for this flag are: ‘1’ for running the first test only, ‘2’ for running the second test only and ‘3’ for running both tests. Any other value means that no test will be carried out. If this keyword is omitted, the default value is 0.

7. ‘NormalizationChoice’

204 This keyword controls the generation and writing of normalization data for theoretical and observational lines to the ‘Transitions’ output ﬁle alongside the original emissivity data. The options for this keyword are

• ‘0’ for no normalization. In this case no normalization data will be written to the ‘Transitions’ ﬁle. Any invalid normalization choice will also be treated like zero.

• ‘1’ for internal normalization with the theoretical data of one of the transition lines produced by the program. In this case this should be followed by the index of the normalization line.

• ‘2’ for normalizing with respect to an outside set of emissivity values corresponding to the temperatures included under the ‘Temperature(K)’ keyword. The emissivity values should be on the next line(s) of text and in the SI units (i.e. in J.s−1.m−3).

• ‘3’ for normalizing with respect to an outside set of emissivity data in the form of effective recombination coefficients corresponding to the specified temperatures. In this case the recombination coefficients should be followed by the wavelength of the line to be normalized to. The recombination coefficients in the input data file should be in cm3.s−1 while the wavelength, which follows the recombination coefficients, should be in nanometer. The reason for this choice is to avoid potential error in conversion as the available data in the literature are mostly given in these units rather than SI units. These values should be entered on the next line(s) of text in the data file.

• ‘4’ for normalizing with respect to an outside set of emissivity data in the form of effective recombination coefficients corresponding to a set of temperatures that may be different from those included under the ‘Temperature(K)’

205 keyword. In this case, the recombination coefficients corresponding to the temperature values of the ‘Temperature(K)’ keyword are obtained by interpolation or extrapolation using ‘polint’ algorithm [145]. This algorithm is a polynomial interpolation routine which implements Nevilles interpolating method and is regarded as an improvement to the classical Lagrange’s formula for polynomial interpolation. For this option, the normalization choice should be followed by the number of points which identify the order of interpolation (e.g. ‘3’ for 3-point second order interpolation and so on). The recommended value for the number of points is ‘3’ or ‘4’. Going beyond this should be for a good reason, otherwise the interpolation may fail to produce reasonable results. The details should be sought in the literature of numerical methods. An initial investigation suggests that the optimal number of points may depend on the proximity to the tabulated data points and the nature of the process, i.e. interpolation vs. extrapolation. It may be a good idea to have a trial run inspecting the estimated errors which can be found in the ‘Transitions’ output file before choosing the order of interpolation. The required data entries, which should follow the number of points, are the number of data pairs (i.e. temperature in K and recombination coefficient in cm3.s−1) followed by the data pairs followed by the wavelength of the line of normalization in nanometer. These values should be included on the next line(s) of text in the data file.

If this keyword is omitted, the default value is 0.

8. ‘RecCoeﬃcient’

This keyword controls the production and writing of the eﬀective recombination

coeﬃcients, %f , which are equivalent to the given emissivities. Vacuum wavelength of the transition line will be used in these calculations as the air wavelength is not

206 available for λ < 2000 A.˚ The keyword should be followed by a boolean flag, i.e. ‘1’ for ‘Yes’ and ‘0’ for ‘No’. Any other choice will be treated as zero. The written recombination coefficients to the ‘Transitions’ file will be in the SI units (m3.s−1). If this keyword is omitted, the default value is 0.

9. ‘TheoAstroLS’

This keyword controls the algorithm to obtain the sum of weighted square diﬀer- ences between the observational lines and their theoretical counterparts over the input temperature range. This sum, in its basic form, is given by

N 2 X no nt2 χ = wi Ii − εi (C.3) i=1

no nt where Ii is the normalized observational flux of line i, εi is the normalized theoretical emissivity, wi is a statistical weight which mainly accounts for error, and N is the number of lines involved in the least squares procedure. This algorithm also offers the possibility of computing the temperature confidence interval.

The keyword requires a boolean flag to compute χ2 or not. If the flag is on, the name of the file that maps the indices of the theoretical and observational lines should follow. The structure of the mapping file requires that the index of the observational line should be followed by the index of its theoretical counterpart. If an observational line corresponds to more than one theoretical line, which occurs when observational lines from the same multiplet are blended or when the lines are too close to be entirely resolved observationally, the mapping should be repeated independently for each theoretical line. The rest of the file can be used for commenting or storing other data if the index mapping is terminated with ‘-999’. The results of the least squares minimization algorithm are written to a file called ‘TNV’. This file contains information on χ2, temperature at minimum χ2, and the temperature limits for the confidence interval. This is followed by the

207 temperatures with the corresponding least squares residuals.

10. ‘DecayRoutes’

This keyword is for finding the decay routes to a particular state, bound or free, from all upper states. The parameters required are a boolean flag to run this algorithm or not (‘1’ for ‘Yes’ and ‘0’ for ‘No’). In the first case, the configuration, term and 2J of the state should follow. As the number of decay routes can be very large (millions and even billions) especially for the low bound states, another parameter is used to control the maximum number of detected routes, and this parameter should follow. The results (number of decay routes and the routes themselves grouped in complete and non-complete) are output to ‘DecayRoutes’

file. If the number of detected routes exceeds the maximum number, say n, only the first n routes will be written to the ‘DecayRoutes’ file. The scheme is that the program keeps detecting the routes as long as the total number of complete and uncomplete routes detected at any point during the program execution does not exceed the maximum number. The algorithm follows the routes from the given state upwards, and hence the number of detected routes, complete and uncomplete, steadily increases as iteration progresses. Consequently, to find a substantial number of complete routes or all of them if this is feasible, the maximum number should be set to a sufficiently large value. It is recommended that for the bound states and low resonances the maximum number should be increased in steps until the output satisfies the user need. If the maximum number was set to a very large value the program may fail or take very long time to complete; moreover the data produced will become virtually useless thanks to its massive size. The states of each decay route are identified by their configuration, term and

2J. For resonances, the Saha capture term and the radiative decay term are also given when relevant. These temperature-dependent data are given for a single

208 temperature, that is the ﬁrst value in the temperature array.

C.2.2 ‘ResEmis’ Input Data File

This is the ﬁle containing the data for resonances. The ﬁle contains four main sections:

1. The ﬁrst line in the ﬁle is a comment line. This is followed by the number of resonances followed by a number of text lines matching the number of resonances. Each one of these lines contains an index identifying the resonance,

the energy position of the resonance in z-scaled Ryd, the width in z-scaled Ryd, the configuration, term, 2J, parity, a flag for marking the energy position data as experimental (1) or theoretical (0), and a flag marking the

resonances, according to their departure coeﬃcients b, as ‘good’ (1) or not (0) so that the bad ones with low b can be excluded from computations if required. Each of the conﬁguration and term should be a single string with no space in between.

2. After the resonances data, a comment is expected. This comment, which can span any number of text lines, should be terminated by the string ‘EndOf- Comment’ to mark the end. Next, the number of the bound-state symmetries is expected. This is followed, possibly, by a comment to the end of the line.

The oscillator strengths (f-values) for the free-bound transitions then follow in sections according to the symmetries of the bound states, so the number of

the f-values sections is the same as the number of bound state symmetries. Each section of the f-values is headed by a line containing 2J, parity and the number of bound states in that symmetry. This is followed by a two-

dimensional array of f-values where the columns stand for the resonances as ordered previously, whereas the rows are for the bound states of the given

209 symmetry. For the transitions which are forbidden by the electric dipole

rules for J and parity, the f-values should be set to zero. This convention is adopted to accommodate possible future extension to include optically- forbidden transitions.

3. Next a comment is expected which should be terminated by the ‘EndOfCom- ment’ string to mark the end. The data for the photon energy at resonance

position which correspond to the f-value data in the previous section, then follow, sectioned and formatted as for the f-value data. The photon energy data, which are obtained from the ‘XSECTN’ ﬁle produced by stage STGBF of the R-matrix code, are in Ryd.

4. The last section starts with a comment terminated by the ‘EndOfComment’

string. The f-value data for the free-free transitions are then included in a two-dimensional array where the columns stand for the odd resonances while the rows stand for the even ones. This section is required only if the resonances are of mixed parity.

C.2.3 ‘ELEVEmis’ Input Data File

This file contains the bound states data. The file starts with a comment terminated by the ‘EndOfComment’ marker. Next, the number of bound states symmetries are expected. This is followed by a data block for each symmetry. Each block is headed by a line containing 2J, parity and the number of bound states in that symmetry. Next, a number of text lines as the number of bound states in that symmetry are expected. Each line contains (in the following order) an index identifying the state, the energy of the bound state in z-scaled Ryd, the effective quantum number, the configuration, term and a flag for marking the energy data as experimental (1) or theoretical (0). Each of the configuration and term should be a single string with no

210 space in between. The eﬀective quantum number, though not used in the program, is included because the original data come from the ‘ELEV’ data ﬁle generated by the STGB stage of the R-matrix code. It is kept for possible use in the future.

C.2.4 ‘Transitions’ Output Data File

This is the main output file of ‘Emissivity’ program. The file starts with a number of text lines summarizing the input data used and the output results, followed by a few commentary lines explaining the symbols and units. This is followed by a number of data lines matching the number of transitions. The data for each transition includes (in the following order) an index identifying the transition, status (FF, FB or BB transition), two joined boolean flags describing the experimental state of the energy data of the upper and lower levels (‘0’ for theoretical data and ‘1’ for experimental), the attributes of the upper and lower levels (configuration, term, 2J and parity), wavelength in vacuum, wavelength in air (only for λ > 2000 A),˚ the radiative transition probability, the emissivities corresponding to the given temperatures, the normalized emissivities and the effective recombination coefficients corresponding to the given emissivities. Writing the normalized emissivities and the effective recombination coefficients is optional and can be turned off, as described under ‘NormalizationChoice’ and ‘RecCoefficient’ keywords. As mentioned earlier, if the user chooses to read the astronomical data, the observational lines will be inserted in between the theoretical lines according to their lab wavelength.

C.3 Tests

Apart from the normal debugging and testing of the program components to check that they do what they are supposed to do, two physical tests are incorporated within the program to validate its functionality and verify that no serious er-

211 rors have occurred in processing and computing the data. These tests are the population-balance test and the ground-metastable test. The ﬁrst test relies on the fact that the population of each state should equal the depopulation. This balance is given by the relation

X r X r NjΓji = Ni Γik (C.4) j>i k

X r X r NjΓj = NkΓki (C.5) ∀j ∀i,k>i where i is an index for ground and metastable states and j is an index for resonances.

212 Appendix D

Input Data for R-matrix and Autostructure

In this appendix we include the input data ﬁles that we used to generate our theoretical results from R-matrix and Autostructure. This is for the purpose of thoroughness and to enable the interested researcher to regenerate and check our results. It should be remarked that the structure of the R-matrix and Autostruc- ture data ﬁles is fully explained in the write-up of these codes as given by Badnell [41, 113].

D.1 R-matrix Input Data

In this section we present our input data ﬁles for each stage of R-matrix.

D.1.1 STG1

The input data ﬁle for this stage is:

STO- &STG1A RAD=’YES’ RELOP=’YES’ ISMITN=1 &END &STG1B NZED=6 NELC=4 MAXORB=7 MAXLA=3 MAXLT=10 MAXC=16 ISMIT(1)=30 ISMIT(2)=31 ISMIT(3)=32 ISMIT(4)=43 MAXE=8 IBC=1 &END 10202130313243 5 1 1 2 2 2 5.13180 8.51900 2.01880 4.73790 1.57130 21.28251 6.37632 0.08158 -2.61339 -0.00733 5 1 1 2 2 2

213 5.13180 8.51900 2.01880 4.73790 1.57130 -5.39193 -1.49036 5.57151 -5.25090 0.94247 3 1 2 3 1.75917 1.75917 1.75917 5.69321 -19.54864 10.39428 4 2 2 2 2 1.47510 3.19410 1.83070 9.48450 1.01509 3.80119 2.75006 0.89571 2 2 3 1.98138 1.96954 14.41203 -10.88586 1 3 2.11997 5.84915 1 4 2.69086 9.69136 10.0000000 0.0 5 1 1 2 2 2 5.13180 8.51900 2.01880 4.73790 1.57130 21.28251 6.37632 0.08158 -2.61339 -0.00733 5 1 1 2 2 2 5.13180 8.51900 2.01880 4.73790 1.57130 -5.39193 -1.49036 5.57151 -5.25090 0.94247 3 1 2 3 1.75917 1.75917 1.75917 5.69321 -19.54864 10.39428 4 2 2 2 2 1.47510 3.19410 1.83070 9.48450 1.01509 3.80119 2.75006 0.89571 2 2 3 1.98138 1.96954 14.41203 -10.88586 1 3 2.11997 5.84915 1 4 2.69086 9.69136 10.0000000 0.0

D.1.2 STG2

The input data ﬁle for this stage is:

STO- &STG2A RAD=’YES’ RELOP=’YES’ &END &STG2B MAXORB=7 NELC=4 NAST=26 INAST=0 MINST=2 MAXST=4 MINLT=0 MAXLT=8 &END 10202130313243 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 0

214 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 2 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 3 0 0 3 0 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 0 2 3 1 2 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 48 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 2 3 3 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0

D.1.3 STGJK

The input data ﬁle for this stage is:

S.S. &STGJA RAD=’YES’ &END &STGJB JNAST=46 IJNAST=12 &END 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 1 2 1

215 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 2 0 4 0 6 0 0 1 2 1 4 1 4 0 2 1 2 0 4 1 6 1 8 1 2 0 4 0 6 0 4 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 2 1 6 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 5 0 7 0 9 0 11 0 1 1 3 1 5 1 7 1 9 1 11 1

D.1.4 STG3

The input data ﬁle for this stage is:

S.S. &STG3A RAD=’YES’ &END &STG3B &END

D.1.5 STGF

The parameters in the input data ﬁle with a sample data is:

&STGF IMODE = 0 IPRKM = 1 IQDT = 0 IRD0 = 99 IMESH = 1 IEQ = -1 PERT = ’NO’ LRGLAM = -1 IBIGE = 0 IPRINT = 3 IRAD = 1 IOPT1 = 2 &END &MESH1 MXE = 1000 E0 = 0.0298042 EINCR = 5.0E-8 &END 0 3 1 -1 -1 -1

216 D.1.6 STGB

The input ﬁle for this stage is:

&STGB IPERT=0 IRAD=1 &END 0 1 0 0.1 13.0 0.001 0 3 0 0.1 13.0 0.001 0 5 0 0.1 13.0 0.001 0 7 0 0.1 13.0 0.001 0 9 0 0.1 13.0 0.001 0 1 1 0.1 13.0 0.001 0 3 1 0.1 13.0 0.001 0 5 1 0.1 13.0 0.001 0 7 1 0.1 13.0 0.001 0 9 1 0.1 13.0 0.001 0 11 1 0.1 13.0 0.001 -1 -1 -1

D.1.7 STGBF

For this stage, default values are used, that is:

&STGBF &END

D.1.8 STGBB

The input data ﬁle for this stage is:

&STGBB IPRINT=0 IBUT=0 &END 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 3 0 0 5 1 0 5 0 0 3 1 0 5 0 0 5 1 0 5 0 0 7 1 0 7 0 0 5 1 0 7 0 0 7 1 0 7 0 0 9 1 0 9 0 0 7 1 0 9 0 0 9 1 0 9 0 0 11 1 0 11 0 0 9 1 0 11 0 0 11 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1

D.1.9 STGQB

The parameters in the input data ﬁle with a sample data is:

0 0 0 1 0 3 1 2.945 4.1 1.0E-8

217 D.2 Autostructure Input Data

Autostructure code was used in various stages to produce required theoretical atomic data or to check the results of R-matrix. In the next sections we present some of these input data ﬁles.

D.2.1 Polarizability

The following input data ﬁle was used to decide which terms of the target are the most important ones by having the largest polarizability, as explained in § 3.2.2.

S.S. 123456789 22 12513 23 12514 12515 12516 13514 13515 13516 10 20 21 &SALGEB RUN=’ ’ RAD=’YES’ CUP=’IC’ TITLE=’C III_9’ KORB1=1 KORB2=1 KUTSO=0 &END &SMINIM NZION=6 INCLUD=6 PRINT=’FORM’ NLAM=6 RADOUT=’YES’ &END 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 -1.0000 -1.0000 -1.0000

D.2.2 Transition Probabilities

The following input data were used to compute the radiative transition probabilities, as discussed in § 3.4.1.

S.S. 123456789 12513516 12513515 12523 22516 12513517 10 20 21 30 31 32 &SALGEB RUN=’ ’ RAD=’YES’ CUP=’IC’ TITLE=’Resonance’ KORB1=1 KORB2=1 KUTSO=0 &END &SMINIM NZION=6 INCLUD=6 PRINT=’FORM’ NLAM=6 RADOUT=’YES’ &END 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

D.2.3 f-values

The following input data ﬁle was used to generate f-values for all FF transitions. It was also used to generate f-values for the free-bound and bound-bound transitions for the topmost bound states, namely the 1s22s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo and 4Do levels, as these quartets with their large eﬀective quantum number are out of range of RMATRX-I validity.

S.S. 2s2 nl (2s

218 20 21 30 31 32 40 41 42 43 50 51 52 53 54 60 61 62 63 64 65 70

&SALGEB RUN=’ ’ RAD=’YES’ CUP=’IC’ TITLE=’Resonance’ KORB1=1 KORB2=1 KUTSO=0 &END &SMINIM NZION=6 INCLUD=500 PRINT=’FORM’ NLAM=22 NVAR=22 RADOUT=’YES’ &END 1.43240 1.43380 1.39690 1.25760 1.20290 1.35930 1.25830 1.19950 1.35610 1.41460 1.26080 1.20020 1.35770 1.41420 1.32960 1.26370 1.20250 1.36210 1.41520 1.41420 2.34460 1.26790 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

219 Appendix E

Tables

In this appendix, we present a sample of the data produced during this investigation. In Table E.1 the theoretical results for the energies of the bound states

+ 2+ 1 e of C below the C S0 threshold are given alongside the available experimental data from the NIST database [16]. Similarly, Table E.2 presents the energy and autoionization width data for the resonances as obtained by the K-matrix and QB methods. In these tables, a negative fine structure splitting indicates that the theoretical levels are in reverse order compared to their experimental counterparts. It is noteworthy that due to limited precision of figures in these tables, some data may appear inconsistent, e.g. a zero fine structure splitting from two levels with different energies. Full-precision data in electronic format are available from the author of this thesis on request.

Regarding the bound states, all levels with eﬀective quantum number nf between 0.1-13 for the outer electron and 0 ≤ l ≤ 5 (142 states) are sought and found by R-matrix. The 8 uppermost bound states in Table E.1, i.e. the levels of 1s22s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo and 4Do, have quantum numbers higher than 13 and hence are out of range of the R-matrix approximation validity; therefore only experimental data are included for these states. Concerning the resonances, we searched for all

220 states with n < 5 where n is the principal quantum number of the active electron. 61 levels were found by the K-matrix method and 55 by the QB method.

Tables E.3-E.5 present a sample of the f-values of the free-bound transitions for some bound symmetries as obtained by integrating photoionization cross section over photon energy where these data are obtained from stage STGBF of the R- matrix code. The columns in these tables stand for the bound states identiﬁed by their indices as given in Table E.1 while the rows stand for the resonances represented by their indices as given in Table E.2. The superscript denotes the power of 10 by which the number is to be multiplied. An entry of ‘0’ in the f-value tables indicates that no peak was observed in the photoionization cross section data.

The reason for presenting a sample of the f-values for the free-bound transitions only is that they require considerable effort to produce. No data belonging to f- values for the bound-bound transitions are given here because they can be easily obtained from the ‘FVALUE’ file generated by the R-matrix code using the input data files given in § D.1 in AppendixD. Similarly, no data related to the f-values for the free-free transitions are provided in this appendix because they can be easily generated by Autostructure using the input data file supplied in § D.2.3 in AppendixD. Finally, Table E.6 contains a sample of the effective recombination coefficients for transitions extracted from our list, SS1, in a wavelength range where several lines have been observed in the spectra of planetary nebulae. It should be remarked that the data of SS1 are generated assuming electron and ion number density of 1010 m−3.

221 Table E.1: The available experimental data from NIST for the bound states of C+ below the C2+ 1 e R S0 threshold alongside the theoretical results from -matrix calculations.

In.a Conﬁg.b Level NEEWc NEERd FSSe TERf FSSRg 2 2 o 1 2s 2p P1/2 0 -1.792141 -1.792571 2 2 o 2 2s 2p P3/2 63.42 -1.791563 63.4 -1.791994 63.3

2 4 e 3 2s2p P1/2 43003.3 -1.400266 -1.401292 2 4 e 4 2s2p P3/2 43025.3 -1.400065 -1.401090 2 4 e 5 2s2p P5/2 43053.6 -1.399807 50.3 -1.400755 59.0

2 2 e 6 2s2p D5/2 74930.1 -1.109327 -1.105247 2 2 e 7 2s2p D3/2 74932.62 -1.109304 2.5 -1.105266 -2.1

2 2 e 8 2s2p S1/2 96493.74 -0.912825 -0.899439

2 2 e 9 2s2p P1/2 110624.17 -0.784059 -0.772978 2 2 e 10 2s2p P3/2 110665.56 -0.783682 41.4 -0.772570 44.8

2 2 e 11 2s 3s S1/2 116537.65 -0.730171 -0.727698

2 2 o 12 2s 3p P1/2 131724.37 -0.591780 -0.592081 2 2 o 13 2s 3p P3/2 131735.52 -0.591678 11.1 -0.591980 11.1

3 4 o 14 2p S3/2 142027.1 -0.497894 -0.487491

2 2 e 15 2s 3d D3/2 145549.27 -0.465798 -0.466024 2 2 e 16 2s 3d D5/2 145550.7 -0.465785 1.4 -0.466005 2.1

3 2 o 17 2p D5/2 150461.58 -0.421034 -0.412359 3 2 o 18 2p D3/2 150466.69 -0.420987 5.1 -0.412388 -3.1

2 2 e 19 2s 4s S1/2 157234.07 -0.359318 -0.358955

2 2 o 20 2s 4p P1/2 162517.89 -0.311169 -0.310784 2 2 o 21 2s 4p P3/2 162524.57 -0.311108 6.7 -0.310723 6.6

3 o 4 o 22 2s2p( P )3s P1/2 166967.13 -0.270624 -0.268893 3 o 4 o 23 2s2p( P )3s P3/2 166990.73 -0.270409 -0.268645 3 o 4 o 24 2s2p( P )3s P5/2 167035.71 -0.269999 68.6 -0.268229 72.9

2 2 e 25 2s 4d D3/2 168123.74 -0.260084 -0.260084 2 2 e 26 2s 4d D5/2 168124.45 -0.260078 0.7 -0.260074 1.1

3 2 o 27 2p P1/2 168729.53 -0.254564 -0.245329 3 2 o 28 2p P3/2 168748.3 -0.254393 18.8 -0.245083 27.1

2 2 o 29 2s 4f F5/2 168978.34 -0.252297 -0.252162 2 2 o 30 2s 4f F7/2 168978.34 -0.252297 0.0 -0.252160 0.2

2 2 e 31 2s 5s S1/2 173347.84 -0.212479 -0.212278

2 2 o 32 2s 5p P1/2 175287.39 -0.194804 -0.190099

222 Table E.1: continued.

In. Conﬁg. Level NEEW NEER FSS TER FSSR 2 2 o 33 2s 5p P3/2 175294.75 -0.194737 7.4 -0.190072 3.0

3 o 2 o 34 2s2p( P )3s P1/2 177774.59 -0.172139 -0.165330 3 o 2 o 35 2s2p( P )3s P3/2 177793.54 -0.171967 19.0 -0.165143 20.5

2 2 e 36 2s 5d D3/2 178495.11 -0.165573 -0.165606 2 2 e 37 2s 5d D5/2 178495.71 -0.165568 0.6 -0.165599 0.8

2 2 o 38 2s 5f F5/2 178955.94 -0.161374 -0.161296 2 2 o 39 2s 5f F7/2 178955.94 -0.161374 0.0 -0.161295 0.1

2 2 e 40 2s 5g G7/2 179073.05 -0.160307 -0.160184 2 2 e 41 2s 5g G9/2 179073.05 -0.160307 0.0 -0.160184 0.0

2 2 e 42 2s 6s S1/2 181264.24 -0.140339 -0.140231

3 o 4 e 43 2s2p( P )3p D1/2 181696.66 -0.136399 -0.136848 3 o 4 e 44 2s2p( P )3p D3/2 181711.03 -0.136268 -0.136699 3 o 4 e 45 2s2p( P )3p D5/2 181736.05 -0.136040 -0.136454 3 o 4 e 46 2s2p( P )3p D7/2 181772.41 -0.135709 75.8 -0.136115 80.4

3 o 2 e 47 2s2p( P )3p P1/2 182023.86 -0.133417 -0.133095 3 o 2 e 48 2s2p( P )3p P3/2 182043.41 -0.133239 19.6 -0.132896 21.8

2 2 o 49 2s 6p P1/2 182993.23 -0.124584 -0.124376 2 2 o 50 2s 6p P3/2 182993.66 -0.124580 0.4 -0.124351 2.7

2 2 e 51 2s 6d D3/2 184074.59 -0.114730 -0.114739 2 2 e 52 2s 6d D5/2 184075.28 -0.114723 0.7 -0.114729 1.0

2 2 o 53 2s 6f F5/2 184376.06 -0.111982 -0.111924 2 2 o 54 2s 6f F7/2 184376.06 -0.111982 0.0 -0.111924 0.1

2 2 e 55 2s 6g G7/2 184449.27 -0.111315 -0.111264 2 2 e 56 2s 6g G9/2 184449.27 -0.111315 0.0 -0.111264 0.0

2 2 o 57 2s 6h H9/2 184466.5 -0.111158 -0.111122 2 2 o 58 2s 6h H11/2 184466.5 -0.111158 0.0 -0.111122 0.0

3 o 4 e 59 2s2p( P )3p S3/2 184690.98 -0.109113 -0.108410

2 2 e 60 2s 7s S1/2 185732.93 -0.099618 -0.099537

3 o 4 e 61 2s2p( P )3p P1/2 186427.35 -0.093290 -0.092097 3 o 4 e 62 2s2p( P )3p P3/2 186443.69 -0.093141 -0.091950 3 o 4 e 63 2s2p( P )3p P5/2 186466.02 -0.092937 38.7 -0.091717 41.8

2 2 o 64 2s 7p P1/2 186745.9 -0.090387 -0.090313 2 2 o 65 2s 7p P3/2 186746.3 -0.090383 0.4 -0.090302 1.1

223 Table E.1: continued.

In. Conﬁg. Level NEEW NEER FSS TER FSSR

2 2 e 66 2s 7d D3/2 187353 -0.084854 -0.084804 2 2 e 67 2s 7d D5/2 187353 -0.084854 0.0 -0.084764 4.4

2 2 o 68 2s 7f F5/2 187641.6 -0.082225 -0.082171 2 2 o 69 2s 7f F7/2 187641.6 -0.082225 0.0 -0.082171 0.0

2 2 e 70 2s 7g G7/2 187691.4 -0.081771 -0.081744 2 2 e 71 2s 7g G9/2 187691.4 -0.081771 0.0 -0.081744 0.0

2 2 o 72 2s 7h H9/2 187701 -0.081683 -0.081645 2 2 o 73 2s 7h H11/2 187701 -0.081683 0.0 -0.081645 0.0

2 2 e 74 2s 8s S1/2 — — -0.074324

3 o 2 e 75 2s2p( P )3p D3/2 188581.25 -0.073662 -0.071901 3 o 2 e 76 2s2p( P )3p D5/2 188615.07 -0.073354 33.8 -0.071582 34.9

2 2 o 77 2s 8p P1/2 — — -0.068349 2 2 o 78 2s 8p P3/2 — — -0.068343 0.7

2 2 o 79 2s 8f F5/2 — — -0.062873 2 2 o 80 2s 8f F7/2 — — -0.062872 0.0

2 2 e 81 2s 8g G7/2 189794.2 -0.062609 -0.062580 2 2 e 82 2s 8g G9/2 189794.2 -0.062609 0.0 -0.062580 0.0

2 2 o 83 2s 8h H11/2 — — -0.062511 2 2 o 84 2s 8h H9/2 — — -0.062511 0.0

2 2 e 85 2s 8d D3/2 — — -0.062612 2 2 e 86 2s 8d D5/2 — — -0.062564 5.3

2 2 e 87 2s 9s S1/2 — — -0.057638

2 2 o 88 2s 9p P1/2 — — -0.053490 2 2 o 89 2s 9p P3/2 — — -0.053486 0.4

2 2 e 90 2s 9d D3/2 — — -0.049942 2 2 e 91 2s 9d D5/2 — — -0.049935 0.8

2 2 o 92 2s 9f F5/2 — — -0.049651 2 2 o 93 2s 9f F7/2 — — -0.049650 0.0

2 2 e 94 2s 9g G7/2 — — -0.049441 2 2 e 95 2s 9g G9/2 — — -0.049441 0.0

2 2 o 96 2s 9h H9/2 — — -0.049392 2 2 o 97 2s 9h H11/2 — — -0.049392 0.0

2 2 e 98 2s 10s S1/2 — — -0.046050

224 Table E.1: continued.

In. Conﬁg. Level NEEW NEER FSS TER FSSR

2 2 o 99 2s 10p P1/2 — — -0.042990 2 2 o 100 2s 10p P3/2 — — -0.042987 0.3

2 2 e 101 2s 10d D3/2 — — -0.040487 2 2 e 102 2s 10d D5/2 — — -0.040484 0.3

2 2 o 103 2s 10f F5/2 — — -0.040198 2 2 o 104 2s 10f F7/2 — — -0.040198 0.0

2 2 e 105 2s 10g G7/2 — — -0.040044 2 2 e 106 2s 10g G9/2 — — -0.040044 0.0

2 2 o 107 2s 10h H9/2 — — -0.040007 2 2 o 108 2s 10h H11/2 — — -0.040007 0.0

2 2 e 109 2s 11s S1/2 — — -0.037746

2 2 o 110 2s 11p P1/2 — — -0.035300 2 2 o 111 2s 11p P3/2 — — -0.035298 0.2

2 2 e 112 2s 11d D3/2 — — -0.033449 2 2 e 113 2s 11d D5/2 — — -0.033448 0.2

2 2 o 114 2s 11f F5/2 — — -0.033209 2 2 o 115 2s 11f F7/2 — — -0.033209 0.0

2 2 e 116 2s 11g G7/2 — — -0.033092 2 2 e 117 2s 11g G9/2 — — -0.033092 0.0

2 2 o 118 2s 11h H9/2 — — -0.033064 2 2 o 119 2s 11h H11/2 — — -0.033064 0.0

2 2 e 120 2s 12s S1/2 — — -0.031953

2 2 o 121 2s 12p P1/2 — — -0.029501 2 2 o 122 2s 12p P3/2 — — -0.029499 0.2

3 o 2 e 123 2s2p( P )3p S1/2 — — -0.028972

2 2 e 124 2s 12d D3/2 — — -0.028090 2 2 e 125 2s 12d D5/2 — — -0.028089 0.1

2 2 o 126 2s 12f F5/2 — — -0.027895 2 2 o 127 2s 12f F7/2 — — -0.027895 0.0

2 2 e 128 2s 12g G7/2 — — -0.027804 2 2 e 129 2s 12g G9/2 — — -0.027804 0.0

2 2 o 130 2s 12h H9/2 — — -0.027783 2 2 o 131 2s 12h H11/2 — — -0.027783 0.0

225 Table E.1: continued.

In. Conﬁg. Level NEEW NEER FSS TER FSSR

2 2 e 132 2s 13s S1/2 — — -0.025758

2 2 o 133 2s 13p P1/2 — — -0.025021 2 2 o 134 2s 13p P3/2 — — -0.025020 0.1

2 2 e 135 2s 13d D3/2 — — -0.023920 2 2 e 136 2s 13d D5/2 — — -0.023919 0.1

2 2 o 137 2s 13f F5/2 — — -0.023762 2 2 o 138 2s 13f F7/2 — — -0.023762 0.0

2 2 e 139 2s 13g G7/2 — — -0.023690 2 2 e 140 2s 13g G9/2 — — -0.023690 0.0

2 2 o 141 2s 13h H9/2 — — -0.023673 2 2 o 142 2s 13h H11/2 — — -0.023673 0.0

3 o 4 o 143 2s2p( P )3d F3/2 195752.58 -0.008312 3 o 4 o 144 2s2p( P )3d F5/2 195765.85 -0.008191 3 o 4 o 145 2s2p( P )3d F7/2 195785.74 -0.008010 3 o 4 o 146 2s2p( P )3d F9/2 195813.66 -0.007755 61.1

3 o 4 o 147 2s2p( P )3d D1/2 196557.87 -0.000974 3 o 4 o 148 2s2p( P )3d D3/2 196563.41 -0.000923 3 o 4 o 149 2s2p( P )3d D5/2 196571.82 -0.000846 3 o 4 o 150 2s2p( P )3d D7/2 196581.96 -0.000754 24.1

a Index.

b Conﬁguration. The 1s2 core is suppressed from all conﬁgurations.

c NIST Experimental Energy in Wavenumbers (cm−1) relative to the ground state.

d 2+ 1 e NIST Experimental Energy in Rydberg relative to the C S0 limit. e Fine Structure Splitting from experimental values in cm−1.

f R 2+ 1 e Theoretical Energy in Rydberg from -matrix calculations relative to the C S0 limit. g Fine Structure Splitting from R-matrix in cm−1. The minus sign indicates that the theoretical levels are in reverse order compared to the experimental.

226 Table E.2: The available experimental data from NIST for the resonance states of C+ above the C2+ 1Se threshold alongside the 0 theoretical results as obtained by K-matrix and QB methods.

In.a Conﬁg.b Level NEEWc NEERd FSSe TERKf FSSKg FWHMKh TERQi FSSQj FWHMQk 1 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Do 198425.43 0.016045 0.017012 6.00E-10 0.017012 6.00E-10 3/2 2 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Do 198436.31 0.016144 10.9 0.017124 12.3 2.61E-09 0.017124 12.3 2.61E-09 5/2

3 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Po 198844 0.019859 0.020655 2.17E-11 — — 5/2 4 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Po 198865.25 0.020053 0.020849 1.26E-09 0.020849 1.26E-09 3/2 5 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Po 198879.01 0.020178 35.0 0.020968 34.3 5.10E-10 0.020968 5.10E-10 1/2

6 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Fo 199941.41 0.029860 0.031693 5.61E-05 0.031689 5.61E-05 5/2 7 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Fo 199983.24 0.030241 41.8 0.032109 45.6 5.79E-05 0.032106 45.8 5.79E-05 7/2

8 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Po 202179.85 0.050258 0.053787 1.06E-05 0.053787 1.06E-05 3/2 9 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Po 202204.52 0.050483 24.7 0.054019 25.5 1.12E-05 0.054019 25.5 1.12E-05 1/2

10 2s2p(3Po)4s 4Po 209552.36 0.117441 0.118682 2.55E-07 0.118682 2.55E-07 1/2 11 2s2p(3Po)4s 4Po 209576.46 0.117661 0.118938 6.25E-07 0.118938 6.25E-07 3/2 12 2s2p(3Po)4s 4Po 209622.32 0.118079 70.0 0.119304 68.3 <1.0E-16 — — 5/2

13 2s2p(3Po)4s 2Po — — 0.137883 6.13E-03 0.137866 6.02E-03 1/2 14 2s2p(3Po)4s 2Po — — 0.138385 55.0 6.15E-03 0.138365 54.8 6.03E-03 3/2

15 2s2p(3Po)4p 2Pe 214404.33 0.161655 0.162743 2.12E-08 0.162743 2.12E-08 1/2 16 2s2p(3Po)4p 2Pe 214429.95 0.161889 25.6 0.162996 27.7 9.89E-08 0.162996 27.8 9.89E-08 3/2

17 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 214759.91 0.164896 0.165629 5.30E-11 0.165629 5.31E-11 1/2 18 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 214772.84 0.165014 0.165760 5.12E-08 0.165760 5.12E-08 3/2 19 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 214795.27 0.165218 0.165984 6.95E-08 0.165984 6.95E-08 5/2 20 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 214829.77 0.165532 69.9 — — — — 7/2

21 2s2p(3Po)4p 4Se 215767.77 0.174080 0.174625 6.59E-12 — — 3/2

22 2s2p(3Po)4p 4Pe 216362.84 0.179503 0.180780 7.26E-08 0.180780 7.26E-08 1/2 23 2s2p(3Po)4p 4Pe 216379.59 0.179655 0.180931 1.03E-07 0.180931 1.03E-07 3/2 24 2s2p(3Po)4p 4Pe 216400.57 0.179846 37.7 0.181145 40.0 6.05E-07 0.181145 40.0 6.05E-07 5/2

25 2s2p(3Po)4p 2De — — 0.185420 1.19E-03 0.185422 1.18E-03 3/2 26 2s2p(3Po)4p 2De 216927 0.184644 0.185859 48.2 1.18E-03 0.185859 48.0 1.18E-03 5/2

27 2s2p(3Po)4p 2Se — — 0.199765 4.28E-04 0.199765 4.28E-04 1/2

28 2s2p(1Po)3s 2Po — — 0.205892 3.03E-03 0.205889 3.02E-03 1/2 29 2s2p(1Po)3s 2Po — — 0.205912 2.2 3.01E-03 0.205909 2.2 3.01E-03 3/2

30 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Fo 219556.54 0.208606 0.208824 5.08E-11 0.208824 5.08E-11 3/2 31 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Fo 219570.15 0.208730 0.208968 4.23E-09 0.208968 4.23E-09 5/2 32 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Fo 219590.76 0.208918 0.209174 5.96E-09 0.209174 5.96E-09 7/2 33 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Fo 219619.88 0.209183 63.3 — — — — 9/2

34 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Do 220125.51 0.213791 0.214804 2.31E-09 0.214804 2.31E-09 1/2 35 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Do 220130.86 0.213839 0.214847 1.06E-09 0.214847 1.06E-09 3/2 36 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Do 220139.41 0.213917 0.214923 1.33E-09 0.214923 1.33E-09 5/2 37 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Do 220150.49 0.214018 25.0 0.215042 26.1 6.19E-09 0.215042 26.1 6.19E-09 7/2

38 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Do 220601.53 0.218128 0.219325 1.99E-08 0.219325 1.99E-08 3/2 39 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Do 220614.51 0.218247 13.0 0.219441 12.7 5.68E-09 0.219441 12.7 5.68E-09 5/2

40 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Po 220811.69 0.220044 0.220495 2.43E-10 0.220495 2.43E-10 5/2 41 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Po 220832.15 0.220230 0.220680 5.32E-10 0.220680 5.32E-10 3/2 42 2s2p(3Po)4d 4Po 220845.07 0.220348 33.4 0.220796 33.0 3.65E-10 0.220796 33.0 3.65E-10 1/2

43 2s2p(3Po)4f 2Fe 221088.88 0.222570 0.223542 9.13E-09 0.223542 9.13E-09 5/2 44 2s2p(3Po)4f 2Fe 221097.92 0.222652 9.0 0.223626 9.2 1.98E-11 — — 7/2

45 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Fe 221093.95 0.222616 0.223626 5.96E-09 0.223626 5.96E-09 3/2

227 Table E.2: continued.

In. Conﬁg. Level NEEW NEER FSS TERK FSSK FWHMK TERQ FSSQ FWHMQ 46 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Fe 221099.11 0.222663 0.223658 5.90E-09 0.223658 5.90E-09 5/2 47 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Fe 221105.73 0.222723 0.223725 5.43E-10 0.223725 5.43E-10 7/2 48 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Fe 221109.78 0.222760 15.8 0.223779 16.8 1.26E-09 0.223779 16.8 1.26E-09 9/2

49 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Fo 221460.88 0.225959 0.227144 1.45E-05 0.227144 1.45E-05 5/2 50 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Fo 221503.33 0.226346 42.4 0.227556 45.1 1.51E-05 0.227556 45.1 1.51E-05 7/2

51 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Ge 221544.81 0.226724 0.227648 5.45E-10 0.227648 5.46E-10 5/2 52 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Ge 221553.99 0.226808 0.227757 7.22E-09 0.227757 7.22E-09 7/2 53 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Ge 221575.61 0.227005 0.227966 6.53E-09 0.227966 6.54E-09 9/2 54 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Ge 221604.9 0.227272 60.1 — — — — 11/2

55 2s2p(3Po)4f 2Ge 221587.12 0.227110 0.228164 2.58E-08 0.228164 2.58E-08 7/2 56 2s2p(3Po)4f 2Ge 221625.72 0.227462 38.6 0.228541 41.4 4.16E-08 0.228541 41.4 4.16E-08 9/2

57 2s2p(3Po)4f 4De 221698.48 0.228125 0.229105 2.97E-12 — — 7/2 58 2s2p(3Po)4f 4De 221707.71 0.228209 0.229229 2.39E-06 0.229229 2.39E-06 5/2 59 2s2p(3Po)4f 4De 221729.69 0.228409 0.229418 7.35E-07 0.229418 7.35E-07 3/2 60 2s2p(3Po)4f 4De 221742.79 0.228528 44.3 0.229529 46.5 <1.0E-16 — — 1/2

61 2s2p(3Po)4f 2De 221729.92 0.228411 0.229459 4.77E-06 0.229459 4.77E-06 5/2 62 2s2p(3Po)4f 2De 221752.26 0.228615 22.3 0.229695 25.9 6.58E-06 0.229696 25.9 6.58E-06 3/2

63 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Po 222258.8 0.233231 0.234626 2.42E-05 0.234626 2.42E-05 3/2 64 2s2p(3Po)4d 2Po 222285.7 0.233476 26.9 0.234870 26.8 2.46E-05 0.234870 26.8 2.46E-05 1/2

a Index.

b Conﬁguration. The 1s2 core is suppressed from all conﬁgurations.

c NIST Experimental Energy in Wavenumbers (cm−1) relative to the ground state.

d NIST Experimental Energy in Rydberg relative to the C2+ 1Se limit. 0

e Fine Structure Splitting from experimental values in cm−1.

f Theoretical Energy in Rydberg from K-matrix calculations relative to the C2+ 1Se limit. 0

g Fine Structure Splitting from K-matrix in cm−1.

h Full Width at Half Maximum from K-matrix in Rydberg.

i Theoretical Energy in Rydberg from QB calculations relative to the C2+ 1Se limit. 0

j Fine Structure Splitting from QB in cm−1.

k Full Width at Half Maximum from QB in Rydberg.

228 Table E.3: Free-bound f-values for bound symmetry Jπ = 1/2o obtained by integrating photoionization cross sections from R-matrix calculations. The superscript denotes the power of 10 by which the number is to be multiplied.

In. 1 12 20 22 27 32 34 49 64 77 88 99 110 121 133 −3 −3 −4 −5 −2 −3 −2 −3 −3 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 15 6.12 1.57 5.60 4.58 1.92 1.01 2.89 3.93 1.55 8.99 5.98 4.26 3.17 2.44 1.92 −3 −4 −4 −5 −3 −4 −2 −3 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 −5 16 3.18 8.30 2.69 1.21 9.72 5.02 1.47 2.02 7.92 4.63 3.07 2.20 1.64 1.26 9.93 −5 −6 −6 −2 −5 −6 −5 −5 −6 −6 −6 −6 −7 −7 −7 17 1.70 4.69 1.59 1.34 5.91 2.92 8.14 1.09 4.27 2.47 1.64 1.16 8.63 6.60 5.15 −6 −6 −7 −2 −5 −7 −5 −6 −6 −6 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 18 8.53 3.43 4.94 1.35 1.19 7.05 2.68 5.00 1.95 1.19 8.00 5.89 4.64 3.50 2.90 −7 −7 −8 −3 −6 −8 −6 −7 −7 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 21 4.43 1.39 5.34 1.78 1.67 7.21 2.04 2.71 1.04 5.92 3.88 2.71 1.99 1.51 1.18 −7 −7 −9 −4 −13 −8 −7 −7 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 22 4.48 3.87 4.64 2.22 6.57 7.26 8.82 1.54 7.90 5.31 3.85 2.95 2.41 1.91 1.53 −6 −6 −7 −3 −7 −8 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −8 23 2.44 1.65 6.16 1.01 1.65 5.61 7.62 5.76 3.75 2.74 2.08 1.61 1.27 1.02 8.32 −2 −2 −3 −7 −3 −3 −2 −3 −3 −3 −3 −3 −3 −3 −4 25 1.81 1.13 3.63 3.44 2.22 1.01 1.66 7.00 4.20 2.96 2.20 1.69 1.32 1.05 8.50 −3 −3 −4 −8 −3 −4 −3 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 −5 −5 −5 27 1.81 2.76 7.42 3.83 1.55 4.26 2.16 4.12 2.69 1.98 1.52 1.20 9.55 7.73 6.32 −9 −8 −8 −7 −6 −6 −5 −7 −7 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 45 1.31 3.51 1.80 7.18 3.61 6.21 1.84 6.64 1.40 6.59 4.25 2.98 2.26 1.82 1.53 −7 −6 −6 −4 −4 −4 −3 −5 −5 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −7 59 8.42 3.47 1.84 6.24 4.20 6.82 1.99 6.74 1.46 6.42 3.64 2.34 1.61 1.17 8.82 −10 −10 −11 −4 −9 −9 −9 −10 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 60 1.93 1.70 2.09 5.12 1.07 1.51 3.28 2.78 7.52 2.96 2.36 1.88 5.71 4.68 3.86 −6 −5 −5 −5 −3 −3 −2 −4 −4 −5 −5 −5 −5 −5 −6 62 8.30 1.94 1.09 6.60 3.76 6.16 1.74 5.94 1.29 5.62 3.17 2.03 1.39 1.00 7.51 229 Table E.4: Free-bound f-values for bound symmetry Jπ = 3/2o obtained by integrating photoionization cross sections from R-matrix calculations. The superscript denotes the power of 10 by which the number is to be multiplied.

In. 2 13 14 18 21 23 28 33 35 50 65 78 89 100 111 122 134 −3 −4 −10 −3 −4 −6 −3 −4 −3 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 −5 −5 −5 15 1.49 3.73 3.75 2.32 1.45 6.09 4.82 2.45 7.17 9.78 3.82 2.21 1.47 1.04 7.77 5.97 4.69 −3 −3 −9 −4 −4 −5 −2 −3 −2 −3 −3 −3 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 16 7.53 1.91 1.58 4.40 7.03 2.70 2.39 1.23 3.60 4.91 1.92 1.11 7.36 5.25 3.91 2.99 2.35 −6 −6 −10 −6 −7 −3 −5 −7 −5 −6 −6 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 17 4.15 1.12 1.96 6.73 4.15 1.33 1.48 7.06 2.02 2.73 1.06 6.09 4.02 2.85 2.11 1.61 1.26 −6 −6 −9 −7 −7 −3 −5 −6 −5 −6 −6 −6 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 18 9.38 2.33 1.26 2.57 9.49 8.54 3.96 1.87 5.00 6.55 2.40 1.38 9.09 6.43 4.53 3.45 2.68 −7 −7 −9 −8 −8 −2 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −8 −8 19 8.52 6.35 2.88 1.31 6.29 1.70 3.61 1.17 4.99 4.47 2.97 2.18 1.67 1.30 1.03 8.24 6.72 −6 −7 −9 −8 −7 −3 −6 −7 −6 −7 −7 −7 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 21 1.07 3.31 9.71 7.28 1.41 1.73 4.13 1.77 5.05 6.70 2.56 1.45 9.47 6.65 4.88 3.70 2.88 −8 −7 −6 −8 −8 −4 −7 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −9 22 8.46 1.94 3.34 2.59 8.10 6.20 5.42 5.30 2.18 3.66 3.16 2.63 2.16 1.76 1.44 1.18 8.36 −7 −7 −6 −7 −8 −4 −7 −8 −6 −7 −7 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 23 8.05 3.16 6.69 3.12 7.82 1.75 8.71 5.77 1.69 3.10 1.41 8.84 6.13 4.48 3.38 2.61 2.06 −5 −6 −5 −7 −6 −4 −6 −7 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −7 −7 −7 24 1.21 7.19 1.02 1.33 1.97 5.70 1.39 9.26 9.35 4.66 2.71 1.93 1.44 1.11 8.68 6.92 5.60 −3 −3 −10 −3 −4 −7 −4 −4 −3 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 −5 25 2.17 1.34 4.07 2.32 3.60 1.03 2.82 1.55 1.81 7.25 4.35 3.06 2.27 1.74 1.36 1.08 8.72 −2 −2 −9 −4 −3 −6 −3 −4 −2 −3 −3 −3 −3 −3 −3 −4 −4 26 1.65 1.03 7.75 2.52 2.85 1.34 2.04 6.47 1.55 6.42 3.82 2.70 2.01 1.40 1.10 8.74 7.06 −3 −3 −9 −8 −4 −8 −3 −4 −3 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 −4 −5 −5 27 1.83 2.69 5.75 3.73 6.92 9.90 1.46 4.33 2.26 4.40 2.77 2.29 1.76 1.39 1.11 8.97 7.34 −10 −8 −11 −2 −10 −7 −6 −6 −5 −7 −7 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 43 8.82 3.29 2.11 1.95 4.70 3.85 4.71 9.11 2.73 9.58 2.10 9.16 5.05 3.29 2.22 1.56 1.13 −10 −9 −13 −6 −9 −7 −7 −7 −6 −8 −8 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 45 1.40 3.21 1.02 1.56 1.28 4.30 3.43 5.82 1.77 6.67 1.43 7.03 4.33 3.03 2.30 1.85 1.55 −10 −8 −12 −4 −9 −6 −6 −6 −5 −7 −7 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 46 3.92 1.91 3.10 8.73 9.29 1.59 3.18 5.65 1.69 5.77 1.32 6.04 3.58 2.41 1.77 1.37 1.11 −10 −9 −13 −5 −9 −8 −7 −7 −6 −8 −8 −9 −9 −9 −9 −10 −10

230 51 2.59 2.29 4.10 2.84 1.02 2.51 2.90 4.87 1.41 4.77 1.03 4.54 2.56 1.64 1.13 8.19 6.15 −6 −6 −10 −5 −6 −4 −3 −3 −3 −4 −5 −5 −5 −6 −6 −6 −6 58 2.89 9.08 8.44 3.22 3.81 5.82 1.25 2.06 5.93 1.97 4.20 1.81 1.05 6.70 4.61 3.32 2.49 −9 −7 −11 −4 −7 −4 −5 −5 −4 −6 −6 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −8 59 7.73 3.06 2.55 1.70 1.65 3.98 4.12 6.90 1.98 6.91 1.45 6.29 3.54 2.39 1.64 1.19 8.89 −11 −12 −10 −11 −12 −5 −10 −10 −10 −10 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 60 1.58 1.07 1.03 3.51 9.86 5.14 2.41 3.99 8.16 1.11 6.77 5.32 4.18 3.31 3.03 2.46 2.00 −6 −5 −9 −5 −6 −4 −3 −3 −2 −4 −5 −5 −5 −5 −6 −6 −6 61 6.45 1.47 5.74 2.85 7.05 2.76 2.50 4.03 1.17 4.03 8.49 3.67 2.07 1.31 8.95 6.41 4.77 −7 −6 −10 −3 −6 −5 −4 −4 −3 −5 −5 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −7 62 6.54 1.93 8.56 1.53 1.60 4.23 3.67 5.87 1.70 6.05 1.31 5.72 3.24 2.07 1.42 1.02 7.67 Table E.5: Free-bound f-values for bound symmetry Jπ = 5/2o obtained by integrating photoionization cross sections from R-matrix calculations. The superscript denotes the power of 10 by which the number is to be multiplied.

In. 17 24 29 38 53 68 79 92 103 114 126 137 −3 −7 −8 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 16 2.78 2.11 1.34 8.88 8.79 8.27 7.47 6.57 5.69 4.90 4.15 3.61 −6 −4 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 18 4.47 5.27 3.69 3.39 3.30 3.25 3.14 3.18 3.12 3.09 2.98 3.21 −7 −3 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 19 1.24 4.78 4.64 4.43 4.37 4.30 4.17 4.00 3.82 3.48 3.66 3.99 −9 −2 −17 −16 −15 20 2.32 1.20 1.72 1.38 3.10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −7 −3 −13 −13 −13 −13 −13 −15 −14 −14 −14 −13 21 4.56 1.61 3.64 3.65 3.21 1.59 1.15 4.49 7.60 7.09 7.56 1.44 −8 −4 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 23 2.24 5.24 9.47 8.94 9.08 8.40 6.36 5.54 4.76 4.07 3.93 3.43 −6 −3 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 24 1.24 1.07 3.20 2.91 2.67 2.43 2.17 1.92 1.69 1.48 1.30 1.14 −4 −10 −5 −5 −5 −5 −5 −5 −5 −5 −5 −5 25 1.57 1.52 5.59 4.91 3.89 3.48 3.05 2.63 2.26 1.93 1.65 1.25 −3 −8 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −7 26 2.29 3.79 3.50 3.16 2.83 2.51 2.20 1.90 1.63 1.39 1.19 9.00 −4 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 43 8.17 1.17 3.26 5.10 6.46 7.25 7.59 7.58 7.35 6.97 6.51 6.02 −2 −6 −8 −8 −8 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −8 44 1.46 2.83 9.13 7.43 9.39 1.06 1.12 1.14 1.12 1.08 1.03 9.68 −7 −8 −8 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 45 1.09 2.81 1.63 2.04 2.08 2.01 1.94 1.87 1.83 1.98 2.20 2.44 −5 −7 −9 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 46 2.49 4.66 3.70 2.17 2.74 3.06 3.17 3.13 2.99 2.77 2.50 2.22 −3 −7 −8 −9 −8 −8 −8 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 47 4.70 9.64 4.28 9.19 1.03 1.06 1.05 9.61 8.45 7.13 5.78 4.46 −7 −9 −8 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −11 −12 −11 −11 51 5.49 7.39 1.91 2.24 2.40 2.20 1.69 1.04 4.31 4.57 1.03 9.47 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −7

231 52 3.19 1.35 2.87 7.10 9.12 1.04 1.11 1.13 1.12 1.09 1.04 9.99 −5 −8 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 −6 55 5.58 6.96 3.70 5.17 6.57 7.40 7.76 7.76 7.51 7.11 6.62 6.08 −5 −4 −9 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 −10 57 1.23 9.69 1.91 3.11 4.07 4.68 5.02 5.15 5.15 5.06 4.92 4.75 −4 −4 −8 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 58 6.08 1.62 1.33 5.77 5.26 4.56 3.83 3.16 2.57 2.10 1.70 1.41 −5 −5 −9 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −8 −9 59 1.27 2.48 8.56 2.70 2.53 2.30 2.04 1.77 1.52 1.31 1.11 9.56 −3 −5 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 61 1.26 8.08 1.74 4.53 3.89 3.29 2.76 2.31 1.95 1.65 1.41 1.24 −4 −6 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −7 −8 −8 62 1.12 2.75 2.04 2.38 2.25 2.05 1.81 1.57 1.36 1.17 9.93 8.59 Table E.6: Sample of the SS1 line list where several lines have been observed astronomically. The first column is for experimental/theoretical energy identification for the upper and lower states respectively where 1 refers to experimental while 0 refers to theoretical. The other columns are for the atomic designation of the upper and lower states respectively, followed by the air wavelength in angstrom and effective dielectronic recombination rate coefficients in cm3.s−1 for the given logarithmic temperatures. The superscript denotes the power of 10 by which the number is to be multiplied. The 1s2 core is suppressed from all configurations.

log10(T) ET Upper Lower λair 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 −190 −81 −47 −37 −34 −34 11 2s2p(3Po)4f 4De 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Po 5116.73 5.53 2.59 1.85 2.89 1.48 3.27 1/2 1/2 −168 −62 −28 −19 −16 −16 11 2s2p(3Po)4f 4De 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Po 5119.46 5.14 9.10 1.11 9.88 4.25 8.88 5/2 3/2 −26 −19 −18 −17 −17 −17 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 2Pe 2s24p 2Po 5120.08 2.50 1.64 7.84 3.26 3.79 1.76 3/2 1/2 −169 −62 −29 −19 −17 −16 11 2s2p(3Po)4f 4De 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Po 5120.17 6.88 1.51 1.97 1.80 7.78 1.63 3/2 1/2 −25 −19 −17 −16 −16 −17 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 2Pe 2s24p 2Po 5121.83 1.20 7.87 3.75 1.56 1.81 8.40 3/2 3/2 −29 −22 −18 −18 −18 −18 11 2s27f 2Fo 2s24d 2De 5122.09 6.05 7.95 2.03 9.32 6.66 3.55 5/2 3/2 −28 −21 −18 −17 −17 −18 11 2s27f 2Fo 2s24d 2De 5122.27 2.11 1.95 3.05 1.44 1.03 5.43 7/2 5/2 −30 −23 −19 −19 −19 −19 11 2s27f 2Fo 2s24d 2De 5122.27 4.32 5.68 1.45 6.66 4.76 2.54 5/2 5/2 −26 −20 −18 −17 −17 −17 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 2Pe 2s24p 2Po 5125.21 1.46 8.64 4.82 5.15 7.05 3.50 1/2 1/2 −27 −20 −18 −17 −17 −17 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 2Pe 2s24p 2Po 5126.96 7.08 4.20 2.34 2.50 3.42 1.70 1/2 3/2 −28 −20 −17 −16 −15 −15 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4Pe 2s2p(3Po)3s 4Po 5132.95 4.96 9.80 1.65 2.49 2.26 1.48 3/2 1/2 −27 −19 −17 −16 −15 −15 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4Pe 2s2p(3Po)3s 4Po 5133.28 1.69 1.09 1.71 1.66 1.50 1.08 5/2 3/2 −28 −20 −18 −17 −16 −16 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4Pe 2s2p(3Po)3s 4Po 5137.26 1.15 5.07 8.50 9.92 8.62 5.55 1/2 1/2 −28 −20 −18 −17 −16 −16 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4Pe 2s2p(3Po)3s 4Po 5139.17 1.57 3.10 5.23 7.89 7.15 4.68 3/2 3/2 −33 −25 −21 −19 −19 −19 01 2s211p 2Po 2s25s 2Se 5141.70 9.29 1.36 3.26 1.25 6.35 6.92 3/2 1/2 −33 −26 −21 −20 −19 −19 01 2s211p 2Po 2s25s 2Se 5141.76 2.10 4.79 1.60 6.26 3.16 3.48 1/2 1/2 −28 −19 −17 −16 −15 −15 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4Pe 2s2p(3Po)3s 4Po 5143.49 5.77 2.55 4.27 4.99 4.34 2.79 1/2 3/2 −27 −19 −17 −16 −15 −15 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4Pe 2s2p(3Po)3s 4Po 5145.16 3.97 2.56 4.01 3.90 3.54 2.53 5/2 5/2 −28 −19 −17 −16 −15 −15 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4Pe 2s2p(3Po)3s 4Po 5151.08 5.59 1.11 1.86 2.81 2.55 1.67 3/2 5/2 −171 −66 −33 −23 −20 −20 11 2s2p(3Po)4f 4Ge 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Po 5162.53 1.92 6.83 5.01 3.80 1.56 3.20 5/2 3/2 −33 −26 −24 −24 −25 −25 11 2s2p(3Po)3d 2Do 2s25g 2Ge 5162.98 7.68 5.07 2.23 2.27 7.55 2.38 5/2 7/2 −108 −43 −24 −18 −17 −17 00 2s2p(3Po)4s 2Po 2s211s 2Se 5172.37 8.25 1.12 6.57 3.60 7.20 5.71 3/2 1/2 −108 −44 −24 −18 −17 −17 00 2s2p(3Po)4s 2Po 2s211s 2Se 5187.14 9.10 7.19 3.55 1.84 3.63 2.86 1/2 1/2 −98 −43 −27 −22 −21 −21 10 2s2p(3Po)4s 4Po 2s29s 2Se 5196.92 7.54 1.97 9.74 5.69 5.63 3.57 3/2 1/2 −98 −44 −27 −23 −22 −22 10 2s2p(3Po)4s 4Po 2s29s 2Se 5203.44 1.74 3.58 1.65 9.41 9.23 5.84 1/2 1/2 −33 −24 −22 −21 −19 −19 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4De 2s24p 2Po 5203.77 7.63 2.44 4.07 7.12 1.35 1.71 5/2 3/2 −137 −56 −31 −24 −22 −22 11 2s2p(3Po)4p 4Se 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Do 5204.20 2.74 2.03 2.33 6.55 5.86 8.17 3/2 1/2 −136 −55 −30 −23 −21 −21 11 2s2p(3Po)4p 4Se 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Do 5205.70 1.73 1.28 1.48 4.15 3.71 5.18 3/2 3/2 −136 −55 −30 −23 −21 −21 11 2s2p(3Po)4p 4Se 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Do 5207.98 3.34 2.47 2.84 8.00 7.15 9.98 3/2 5/2 −31 −24 −22 −20 −19 −19 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4De 2s24p 2Po 5208.74 1.87 3.80 4.99 1.05 1.62 1.83 3/2 1/2 −30 −23 −21 −19 −18 −18 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4De 2s24p 2Po 5210.56 2.50 5.10 6.70 1.41 2.17 2.46 3/2 3/2 −30 −23 −21 −19 −18 −19 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4De 2s24p 2Po 5212.65 1.15 2.43 3.42 1.01 1.06 8.41 1/2 1/2 −31 −23 −21 −20 −19 −19 11 2s2p(3Po)3p 4De 2s24p 2Po 5214.46 5.52 1.17 1.64 4.85 5.09 4.03 1/2 3/2 −158 −61 −31 −22 −20 −19 11 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo 5244.05 1.17 1.89 3.48 4.16 9.58 1.65 7/2 5/2 −157 −60 −30 −21 −18 −18 11 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo 5249.53 2.53 4.08 7.50 8.98 2.07 3.55 7/2 7/2 −126 −50 −26 −19 −17 −17 11 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo 5249.90 1.29 6.68 3.73 3.70 1.86 1.97 5/2 3/2 −125 −48 −25 −18 −16 −16 11 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo 5253.56 2.49 1.29 7.20 7.15 3.59 3.80 5/2 5/2 −125 −48 −25 −18 −16 −16 11 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo 5256.09 2.63 1.09 5.69 5.52 2.75 2.91 3/2 3/2 −156 −59 −29 −20 −17 −17 11 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo 5257.24 2.45 3.96 7.27 8.71 2.01 3.44 7/2 9/2 −124 −48 −24 −17 −15 −15 11 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo 5259.06 1.26 6.53 3.64 3.61 1.81 1.92 5/2 7/2 −126 −50 −26 −19 −17 −17 11 2s2p(3Po)4p 4De 2s2p(3Po)3d 4Fo 5259.66 1.46 5.35 2.67 2.65 1.51 1.78 1/2 3/2

232 Appendix F

Input Data for DVR3D Code

In this appendix we present a sample of the DVR3D input data files that have been + used to generate the H2D line list. This is for the purpose of thoroughness and to enable the interested researcher to reproduce and check our results. The contents of the missing files can be easily deduced by comparing the given files. It should be remarked that the structure of the DVR3D data files is fully explained in the write-up of this code as given by Tennyson et al [244].

F.1 Input Files for Stage DVR3DRJZ

For J = 0 even

&PRT ZR2R1=.FALSE., zembed=.false.,zmors2=.false.,ztran=.true., / 3 44 0 2000 36 1000 2000 2 1 20 0 H2D+: J=0

2.013814000 1.007537200 1.007537200 2.013553200 1.007276470 1.007276470 66000.000 45000.000000 1.7100 0.10000 0.01080 0.0000 0.00000 0.00750 4073.99136362

For J = 0 odd

&PRT ZR2R1=.FALSE., zembed=.false.,zmors2=.false.,ztran=.true., / 3 44 0 2000 36 1000 2000 2 1 20 1 H2D+: J=0

2.013814000 1.007537200 1.007537200 2.013553200 1.007276470 1.007276470 66000.000 45000.000000 1.7100 0.10000 0.01080 0.0000 0.00000 0.00750 4073.99136362

For J = 10 even

233 &PRT ZR2R1=.FALSE., zembed=.false.,zmors2=.false.,ztran=.true., / 3 44 10 2000 36 1000 2000 2 1 20 0 H2D+: J=10

2.013814000 1.007537200 1.007537200 2.013553200 1.007276470 1.007276470 66000.000 45000.000000 1.7100 0.10000 0.01080 0.0000 0.00000 0.00750 4073.99136362

For J = 10 odd

&PRT ZR2R1=.FALSE., zembed=.false.,zmors2=.false.,ztran=.true., / 3 44 10 2000 36 1000 2000 2 1 20 1 H2D+: J=10

2.013814000 1.007537200 1.007537200 2.013553200 1.007276470 1.007276470 66000.000 45000.000000 1.7100 0.10000 0.01080 0.0000 0.00000 0.00750 4073.99136362

For J = 20 even

&PRT ZR2R1=.FALSE., zembed=.false.,zmors2=.false.,ztran=.true., / 3 44 20 2000 36 1000 2000 2 1 20 0 H2D+: J=20

2.013814000 1.007537200 1.007537200 2.013553200 1.007276470 1.007276470 66000.000 45000.000000 1.7100 0.10000 0.01080 0.0000 0.00000 0.00750 4073.99136362

For J = 20 odd

&PRT ZR2R1=.FALSE., zembed=.false.,zmors2=.false.,ztran=.true., / 3 44 20 2000 36 1000 2000 2 1 20 1 H2D+: J=20

2.013814000 1.007537200 1.007537200 2.013553200 1.007276470 1.007276470 66000.000 45000.000000 1.7100 0.10000 0.01080 0.0000 0.00000 0.00750 4073.99136362

F.2 Input Files for Stage ROTLEV3

For J = 9

&PRT toler = 1.0d-4, ztran=.true.,zdcore=.true.,zpfun=.true. / 2000 585 2 18000 Rotation for H2D+ J=9 4073.99136362

For J = 13

&PRT toler = 1.0d-4, ztran=.true.,zdcore=.true.,zpfun=.true. / 2000 550 2 25200 Rotation for H2D+ J=13 4073.99136362

234 For J = 17 &PRT toler = 1.0d-4, ztran=.true.,zdcore=.true.,zpfun=.true. / 2000 407 2 32400 Rotation for H2D+ J=17 4073.99136362

F.3 Input Files for Stage DIPOLE

&PRT zprint=.true.,zstart=.true., / Dipole Transitions for H2D+ 50 4073.99136362

F.4 Input Files for Stage SPECTRA

For T = 300 K &PRT zsort=.true., zpfun=.false., GZ=4073.99136362 / Spectra for dipole moment of h2d+, T=300k 1.0 3.0 300.0 0.00001 1.0 18000.0 1.0 76.485 &SPE zemit=.false.,zplot=.true.,zfreq=.true.,zene=.true.,zprof=.false.,prthr=0.0d0, /

F.5 Input Files for Spectra-BT2

These ﬁles are used to generate temperature-dependent synthetic spectra data used in plotting Figure 5.4. For T = 100 K &PRT zsort=.true., zout=.false., zpfun=.false., GZ=0.0,smin=1.0d-28, emin=-1.0d10, emax=1.0d5, wsmax=10000.0d0, wsmin=1000.0d0,zband=.false., / Spectra_H2D+_at_100K 1.0 3.0 100.0 1.0d-4 1000.0 10000.0 0.500 15.119 &SPE zplot=.true.,zlist=.true.,z90=.false.,zassign=.true.,zemit=.false.,emax1=1.0d6,emax2=1.0d6, zprof=.true.,zdop=.false.,npoints=90000,zfreq=.true.,jmax=20 / For T = 500 K &PRT zsort=.true., zout=.false., zpfun=.false., GZ=0.0,smin=1.0d-28, emin=-1.0d10, emax=1.0d5, wsmax=10000.0d0, wsmin=1000.0d0,zband=.false., / Spectra_H2D+_at_500K 1.0 3.0 500.0 1.0d-4 1000.0 10000.0 0.500 164.53 &SPE zplot=.true.,zlist=.true.,z90=.false.,zassign=.true.,zemit=.false.,emax1=1.0d6,emax2=1.0d6, zprof=.true.,zdop=.false.,npoints=90000,zfreq=.true.,jmax=20 / For T = 1000 K &PRT zsort=.true., zout=.false., zpfun=.false., GZ=0.0,smin=1.0d-28, emin=-1.0d10, emax=1.0d5, wsmax=10000.0d0, wsmin=1000.0d0,zband=.false., / Spectra_H2D+_at_1000K 1.0 3.0 1000.0 1.0d-4 1000.0 10000.0 0.500 516.31 &SPE zplot=.true.,zlist=.true.,z90=.false.,zassign=.true.,zemit=.false.,emax1=1.0d6,emax2=1.0d6, zprof=.true.,zdop=.false.,npoints=90000,zfreq=.true.,jmax=20 / For T = 2000 K &PRT zsort=.true., zout=.false., zpfun=.false., GZ=0.0,smin=1.0d-28, emin=-1.0d10, emax=1.0d5, wsmax=10000.0d0, wsmin=1000.0d0,zband=.false., / Spectra_H2D+_at_2000K 1.0 3.0 2000.0 1.0d-4 1000.0 10000.0 0.500 2487.98 &SPE zplot=.true.,zlist=.true.,z90=.false.,zassign=.true.,zemit=.false.,emax1=1.0d6,emax2=1.0d6, zprof=.true.,zdop=.false.,npoints=90000,zfreq=.true.,jmax=20 /

235