Towards a Reformed Epistemology and Its Educational Significance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Towards a Reformed Epistemology and Its Educational Significance TOWARDS A REFORMED EPISTEMOLOGY AND ITS EDUCATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE JOHN GROSVENOR SHORTT Ph D Thesis University of London Institute of Education •.. ( LONDIN. ■UNIV. ,/ - 1 - Abstract of Thesis This thesis examines Reformed epistemology as it finds expression in the writings of Abraham Kuyper, Cornelius Van Til and Alvin Plantinga. It seeks to develop three main themes of this kind of approach in order to see whether they constitute an adequate foundation for a coherent account of faith and to examine their significance for educational theory. The themes studied are: belief in God may be properly basic in a rational noetic structure; divine revelation can be self- authenticating; and sin has noetic effects. Discussion of the third of these is focused upon rational autonomy and, in particular, upon the form it takes in the pancritical rationalism of W. W. Bartley. The position developed is a moderate form of foundationalism which seeks to ground belief in God in an immediate awareness of him speaking through the propositions of scripture. It opposes an ideal of theonomous response to divine revelation to that of unlimited rational autonomy. The study of educational issues commences with an examination of the relationship between a Reformed Christian worldview and educational (or other) theory construction and argues for the transformation from within of the areas of knowledge through the introduction into them of Christian presuppositions. In accordance with this strategy for the integration of faith and learning, a study is made of the implications of the Reformed critique of autonomy for educational aims and methods and for discussions of the issue of indoctrination. The final issue dealt with is that of whether or not it is right or necessary to set up separate schools of Reformed Christian and other outlooks in our contemporary pluralist society. The conclusion reached is that there is a place for good Reformed Christian schools but nevertheless the Reformed Christian teacher may, in good conscience, teach in a state school. CONTENTS Introduction 6 Part One: Reformed Epistemology and Its Characteristic Themes 1 Some Examples of Reformed Epistemology 8 1.1 The Reformed Epistemology of Abraham Kuyper 9 1.1.1 The Noetic Effects of Sin 10 1.1.2 'Two Kinds of People and Two Kinds of Science' 12 1.1.3 Revelation in the Scriptures 14 1.2 The Reformed Epistemology of Cornelius Van Til 16 1.2.1 Two Basic Presuppositions 17 1.2.2 Self-Authenticating Revelation 19 1.2.3 The Noetic Effects of Sin 20 1.3 The Reformed Epistemology of Alvin Plantinga 21 1.3.1 Faith, Evidentialism and Classical Foundationalism 23 1.3.2 Faith, Evidentialism and Coherentism 26 1.3.3 The Proper Basicality of Belief in God 28 1.3.4 The Place of Argument and Apologetics 30 1.3.5 Sin and Cognitive Dysfunction 33 2 Belief in God is Properly Basic 36 2.1 Belief in God 37 2.2 Epistemic Justification 38 2.2.1 Normative and Evaluative Justification 39 2.2.2 Internalist and Externalist Justification 42 2.3 Foundationalism 44 2.3.1 The Regress Argument 46 2.4 Intuitionism 51 2.4.1 Immediate Awareness 53 2.4.2 Immediate Awareness of God? 58 2.4.3 Alternative Conceptual Schemes 63 2.4.4 The Epistemological Gap 68 2.5 The Basis of Meta-Justification 70 2.6 Summary 71 3 Revelation is Self-Authenticating 73 3.1 The Concept of Revelation 74 3.2 Revelation and Personal Knowledge 77 3.3 The Possibility of Divine Revelation 82 3.4 The Authentication of Divine Revelation 85 3.4.1 Divine Revelation and Evidence 87 3.4.2 Divine Revelation and Immediate Awareness 90 3.5 Summary 97 4 Sin has Noetic Effects 98 4.1 Autonomy 101 4.2 Three Kinds of Rationalism 103 4.3 Reason and Commitment 109 4.4 Some Problems in Pancritical Rationalism 116 4.4.1 Argument without Justification? 117 4.4.2 Commitment and Metacontexts 118 4.4.3 The Anthropocentricism of Bartley's Account 120 4.4.4 Self-Referential Incoherence in Bartley's Account 122 4.5 Summary and Some Concluding Remarks 123 Part Two: The Educational Significance of Reformed Epistemology 5 WOrldviews and Theory Construction 126 5.1 Complementarity 127 5.2 A Hierarchy of Perspectives? 133 5.3 Presuppositions 137 5.3.1 Approaches to the Integration of Faith and Learning 141 5.3.2 Presuppositionalist Approaches to Education 145 5.4 Some Concluding Remarks 155 6 Aims, Methods and the Critique of Autonomy 156 6.1 Indoctrination and Method 157 6.2 Indoctrination and Content 161 6.3 Indoctrination and Intention 165 6.4 Methods, Content and Basic Beliefs 168 6.5 Commitment, Neutrality and Impartiality 171 6.6 Non-Rational Methods and Basic Beliefs 176 4 7 Christian Education in a Pluralist Society 180 7.1 Christian Attitudes to Other Faiths 181 7.1.1 Is Reformed Epistemology Necessarily Exclusivist? 183 7.1.2 Inclusivism and Reformed Epistemology 188 7.1.3 Pluralist Alternatives 194 7.2 Christian Schools in a Pluralist Society? 196 7.2.1 The Child's Right to an Open Future? 198 7.2.2 Do Christian Schools lead to Social Fragmentation? 201 7.2.3 Does Nurture have a Place in School? 205 7.3 The Christian Teacher in the State School 208 Conclusion 211 Notes 216 Bibliography 240 INTRODUCTION Possibly the single most discussed development in philosophy of religion in the eighties has been the coming to prominence, through its advocacy by several fairly well-known American writers, of what is usually termed 'Reformed Epistemology'. Some have described it as an important new approach to the philosophy of religion but in fact, although in the hands of these writers it has acquired a particular form, it is by no means a completely novel approach and the writers in question associate themselves with a tradition that goes back through several influential philosophers and theologians of the past century or so to John Calvin and other leaders of the sixteenth century Reformation. With a distinctive view of the nature of faith and knowledge there has been associated a particular kind of approach to education. This is well represented in the United States and Canada in movements to set up Reformed Christian schools and a number of the new independent Christian schools coming into existence in increasing numbers in Britain are also Reformed in their basic outlook. This study is an attempt to develop three main themes of Reformed epistemology in order to see whether they constitute an adequate foundation for a coherent account of knowledge and faith and to examine their significance for educational theory. The study begins with a brief look into the writings of some philosophers who have advocated forms of Reformed epistemology and in whose work these themes can be identified. This is followed by more detailed study of each of the three themes in turn. The first of them is that belief in God may be properly basic in a rational structure of knowledge and belief. This is the theme that has received most attention in recent discussions, so much so that it has almost become synonymous for Reformed epistemology, and it will therefore receive fairly extended treatment in this study. However, the other themes, although neglected in recent discussions, would seem no less important and they too will be examined in their turn. They are that divine revelation can be self-authenticating and that sin has noetic effects. Discussion of the second of these will focus upon what is often taken 6 to be a particularly significant aspect of the effects of sin in the area of knowledge - that of rational autonomy. The study of educational issues will commence with an examination of the relationship between a Reformed Christian worldview and educational (or other) theory construction. This issue is related to a further theme of Reformed epistemology - that of what has been termed 'the pluralism of the academy' whereby it is held that a person's worldview shapes the products of his scholarship. Following this, some implications of the Reformed critique of autonomy for educational aims and methods and for discussions of the issue of indoctrination will be examined. This will lead into the final area for discussion: that of the issue of whether or not it is right or necessary to set up separate schools of Reformed Christian and other outlooks in our contemporary pluralist society. 1 SOME EXAMPLES OF REFORMED EPISTEMOLOGY Nicholas Wolterstorff, one of the foremost contemporary advocates of Reformed epistemology, has identified five theses on the nature of faith and of reason, and on the relation between them, which seem to be characteristic of the Reformed tradition.' They are so in the sense that they are usually associated with the Reformed tradition but not in the sense that all who locate themselves in the tradition would accept all five of them or that only those in the tradition would accept any of them. First, Wolterstorff says that it has characteristically been maintained within the Reformed tradition that one can be rationally justified in believing in God without doing so on the basis of any reasons or evidence. Belief in God can be justified immediately rather than mediately through reasons or evidence. It can itself form the basis for mediate justification and so is 'properly basic' to a rational structure of knowledge and beliefs. Secondly, according to Wolterstorff, it has characteristically been maintained that belief that the Christian Scriptures are revealed by God can also be justified immediately rather than on the basis of argument from reasons or evidence.
Recommended publications
  • The Impossibility of the Pluralistic Hypothesis of John Hick As a Ground for the Christian Relationship with the Non-Christians
    Est Ag 43 (2008) 83-134 The impossibility of the pluralistic hypothesis of John Hick as a ground for the Christian relationship with the non-christians. 11°. Cf Estudio Agustinano 44 (2009) 439-503. 4. THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF THE PLURALISTIC HYPOTHESIS AS A BASIS FOR INTER-RELIGIOUS DIALOQUE Introduction Having giving a detailed elaboration of the position of Hick, it is now a moment to see if it can be a guiding principle for the Christians in their relations with the non-Christians and especially, to the great world reli­ gions especially Judaism, Hinduism, Islam and Buddhism.1 It is possible in this chapter to refer to some of the already mentioned Hickian ideas espe­ cially in the moment of clarification or elaboration of the difficult related to the thought. No doubt, the position of Hick has provoked different reactions and even polemical ones academically due to fact that his position has some­ how been very radical in comparison to other pluraliste something that is in Hick’s awareness. “I realize that, however that what I’m going to say can only appear as an undermining of faith, as a heresy or apostasy, to many at the more con- 1 Cf. X Hick, The Rainbow of Faiths, 12. 84 K. ASENGA servative end of Christianity spectrum. It is also true that some of posi­ tions taken by a very conservative Christian on the issue strike others of us as no longer tenable.”2 It is also true that there are many arguments against Hick but it is not easy to put all of them here or to evaluate all the deficiencies in the hypothesis proposed by him.
    [Show full text]
  • Machen on Barth: Introduction to a Recently Uncovered Paper*
    ι WTJ53 (1991) 189-196 MACHEN ON BARTH: INTRODUCTION TO A RECENTLY UNCOVERED PAPER* D. G. HART N December 2,1929, W. L. Savage of Scribner's publishing house sent OJ. Gresham Machen a copy of Emil Brunner's recently released The Theology of Crisis and asked for some advice on marketing the book. Though Machen had already in the minds of many established his reputation as a cantankerous fundamentalist when he left Princeton for Westminster Sem­ inary, he was still a natural resource for the publisher's request. Machen himself was well acquainted with New York publishers since all of his books to that time had been published with MacMillan, and his newest, The Virgin Birth of Christ, was ready to go to press at Harper and Brothers. More importantly, Machen had heard Brunner lecture the previous year when the Swiss theologian visited Princeton. On that occasion Brunner had ex­ pressed "a special desire" to meet Machen. And according to Douglas Horton, the man responsible for the first English translation of Karl Barth, Brunner spoke of Machen's work "in the highest terms." Furthermore, some at Scribner's probably thought a positive evaluation of Brunner and Barth from Machen, one of the leading spokesmen for conservative Prot­ estantism, would boost sales among fundamentalists. Machen, however, in what became his typical response to inquiries about neoorthodoxy, said that he did not think the theology of crisis was a return to evangelical Chris­ tianity, but his limited knowledge made final judgment difficult. So for a fuller assessment Machen referred the Scribner's executive to Cornelius Van Til, Westminster's newly appointed professor of apologetics who even­ tually became one of America's most outspoken foes of Barthianism.1 * [Editor's note: Among the materials preserved in the Machen Archives, under the super­ vision of Grace Mullen, a previously unpublished paper by J.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The Christian Message in a Postmodern World: a critical re-appropriation of Hendrik Kraemer's theology of religions Perry, T.S. How to cite: Perry, T.S. (1996) The Christian Message in a Postmodern World: a critical re-appropriation of Hendrik Kraemer's theology of religions, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5351/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 T.S. Perry The Christian Message in a Postmodern World: A Critical Re-Appropriation of Hendrik Kraemer's Theology of Religions Doctor of Philosophy 1996 Abstract This thesis is a critical re-appropriation of Hendrik Kraemer's theology of religions. Part I introduces theology of religions through the now familiar threefold typology: Kari Barth represents 'exclusivism,' Kari Rahner, 'inclusivism,' and John Hick, 'pluralism' (Chapter 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Endorsement by Dr Robert Lawrence Kuhn, Closer to Truth
    Closer To Truth Robert Lawrence Kuhn May 25, 2020 To Whom It May Concern: It is a pleasure to provide our wholehearted endorsement of the ZerOrigIndia project and to offer Closer To Truth’s public outreach and promotional resources to support the vital research and understanding of “Zero” as it will no doubt emerge from the ZerOrigIndia project. The concept of Zero is both a critical event in intellectual history and a milestone in the development of mathematics, science and technology. The exploration of zero’s origin, culturally and linguistically as well as mathematically and philosophically, could elicit novel ideas and new ways of thinking. Moreover, the broader philosophical significance of Zero reveals transcendental ideas of Nothing, Emptiness, Void, Blank as features of reality to be apprehended and appreciated and perhaps applied to entirely new categories of thought. Indeed, “Nothing” is a prime Closer To Truth theme. The outstanding group of scholars and thinkers devoted to ZerOrigIndia should encourage our support. Closer To Truth will publish and promote relevant research from the ZerOrigIndia project. As background, Closer To Truth (CTT), featuring world-renown scientists and philosophers, is the definitive PBS/public television series and web archive on Cosmos (cosmology/physics/mathematics, philosophy of science), Consciousness (brain/mind, philosophy of mind) and Meaning/God (theism/atheism/agnosticism, philosophy of religion, critical thinking). The Closer To Truth YouTube channel, offering high intellectual content, is running at >1 million views and >11 million minutes watched per month; >125,000 subscribers; >60% outside the US. You may use my endorsement to support the ZerOrigIndia project in any way deemed appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Person Meets Word Part 1: Personalism in the Language
    WTJ 77 (2015): 355–77 WHERE PERSON MEETS WORD PART 1: PERSONALISM IN THE LANGUAGE THEORY OF KENNETH L. PIKE Pierce Taylor Hibbs I. Introduction eformed theology has always championed the Trinity as the beating heart of the Christian faith. This is true not just of the mainstay his- torical Reformers, Luther and Calvin, but also of Dutch Calvinism, Old R 1 Princeton, and the Westminster heritage. Certainly, Calvin and Melanchthon were not alone in claiming that “God’s triunity was that which distinguished the true and living God from idols.”2 The true God is the Trinity. Out of this tradition emerged Cornelius Van Til and his insistence that the self-contained ontological Trinity be the basis of all human experience and knowledge.3 He claimed that “if we are to have coherence in our experience, Pierce Hibbs currently serves as the Assistant Director of the Center for Theological Writing at Westminster Theological Seminary. 1 On Luther, see David Lumpp, “Returning to Wittenberg: What Martin Luther Teaches Today’s Theologians on the Holy Trinity,” CTQ 67 (2003): 232, 233–34; and Mickey Mattox, “From Faith to the Text and Back Again: Martin Luther on the Trinity in the Old Testament,” ProEccl 15 (2006): 292. On Calvin, see T. F. Torrance, “Calvin’s Doctrine of the Trinity,” CTJ 25 (1990): 166. For an example of the Dutch Calvinist view, see Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, ed. John Bolt, trans. John Vriend, 4 vols. (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2003–2008), 2:279, 329. For Old Princeton, see Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2013), 1:442; and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Reformed Epistemology
    Reformed Epistemology Matthew Jacoby Bertrand Russell, the famous twentieth century philosopher, sceptic, and atheist, was once asked what he would do if he died and it turned out that God did exist after all. What would he say to God who would now call him to account for not believing? His answer was simple: "not enough evidence, God, not enough evidence!" Certainly many people feel the same way. They feel that they could not be held accountable for believing something that is not perceptually obvious or logically necessary. How can God hide so irretrievably from the senses of mankind and then hold us accountable for not believing in his existence? Another famous atheist, W. K. Clifford, went further than this. Working on a Kantian model for rationality and ethics Clifford insisted that, in the absence of evidence, belief in the existence of God is not only irrational but also immoral. The Christian is confronted here by a serious challenge. The challenge is to show that belief in God is rational and specifically by producing evidence. Now in most cases Christians will respond to this by immediately summoning up in their minds all the available evidence for God's existence that they feel is at least persuasive enough to give them a few moments of credibility. And this is very often how Christians deal with the situation precisely because they feel that almost everything in life is proof that God exists. But the Christian quickly realises that what is so evident to him or her is not at all obvious to the objector.
    [Show full text]
  • The Function of Perichoresis and the Divine Incomprehensibility
    Wrj 64 (2002) 289-306 THE FUNCTION OF PERICHORESIS AND THE DIVINE INCOMPREHENSIBILITY LANE G. TIPTON I. Introduction Reformed Trinitarian theism best encapsulates the theology of Cornelius Van Til. He says, "Basic to all the doctrines of Christian theism is that of the self-contained God, or, if we wish, that of the ontological Trinity. It is this notion of the ontological Trinity that ultimately controls a truly Christian methodology."1 Again, "unless we may hold to the presupposition of the self- contained ontological Trinity, human rationality itself is a mirage."2 The onto- logical Trinity provides the architectonic principle in Van Til's theology and apologetic. However, the doctrine of the Trinity in Van Til's thought is as controversial as it is foundational. Regarding the Trinity, Van Til makes the following state- ments, which, when taken together, provide a formulation which John Frame called "a very bold theological move."3 What is this bold move? Van Til argues: It is sometimes asserted that we can prove to men that we are not assuming anything that they ought to consider irrational, inasmuch as we say that God is one in essence and three in person. We therefore claim that we have not asserted unity and trinity of exactly the same thing. Yet this is not the whole truth of the matter. We do assert that God, that is, the whole Godhead, is one person.4 Notice that Van Til does not assert that the person/essence formulation is false, or in need of replacement; instead, he argues that the statement "God is one in essence and three in person" does not yield the "whole truth of the matter." Again Van Til says, "We must hold that God's being holds an absolute numeri- cal identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Pious and Critical Scholarly Paradigms of the Pentateuch •Fl
    Author Biography Spencer is a third year History major from Martinez, California. In addition, he is perusing a minor in Religious Studies. His major research interests involve the study of the Old and New Testament, as well as military history. After graduation, he hopes to take his passion and research to seminary, where he can further his study of the field and history of Biblical criticism. Morgan Pious and Critical Scholarly Paradigms of the Pentateuch — during the 19th & early 20th centuries by Spencer Morgan Abstract This paper examines the antithesis between Christian scholarship and modern higher criticism of the Pentateuch during the 19th and early 20th centuries. During the 19th century, the popularization and eventual hegemony of the Doc- umentary Hypothesis revolutionized the field of Biblical studies. Modern criti- cal scholars claimed that Moses did not write the Pentateuch (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) during the 15th century BC, but rather it was the product of a later redaction of at least four separate documents: J, E, P, and D. Writing hundreds of years apart and long after Moses, their authors reflect not the ancient covenantal religion of Moses, but rather various periods in the evolution of Israel’s religion. The implications of the Documentary Hypothe- sis bring into question the historicity and theological validity of not only the Pen- tateuch, but also the Christian New Testament which presupposes it. The goal of this research is to identify the foundational presuppositions, conclusions, and contextual consciousness that both the modern critics and the Reformed body of Christian scholars opposing them brought to their scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Events and the Nature of Time: Seth Lloyd Source URL
    Events and the Nature of Time: Seth Lloyd Source URL: https://www.closertotruth.com/interviews/55447 Transcript - Long Robert Lawrence Kuhn: Seth, we're both at this – start again. Seth, we're both at this FQXi Conference in Banff, this beautiful area, um, about the physics of events, the importance of events and understanding what physics is, and one of the topics that we're looking at is the nature of time and how events can help us understand what time really is. How – how does that work? How can events help us understand what time is? Seth Lloyd: Well, now, that is something that unfolds in time, like a clock ticking or a – an electron moving from here to there, or a bit flipping in a computer. Or, you know, just our thoughts moving on and our conversation progressing. Um, now time is a mysterious thing and we don't understand it well. Heraclitus said that time is like a river, like this beautiful river here [clears throat], the water flowing and then time ever moving onward and, um – ah, but what makes us feel and perceive that time is going? Um, so, ah – the first answer is I don't know. Robert Lawrence Kuhn: Almost every question is the same. [Laughter.] Seth Lloyd: Yeah, um, but – but there are, ah, different eras of time. There's a perceptual era of time where we don't know something and then we know – know something that we didn't know. This is about getting information. Um, there's a – a conversation, talking back and forth, interacting, where – where you tell me some information, I get the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending the Knowledge of the Glory
    “Extending the knowledge of the glory of God in Christ until that knowledge covers the earth as the waters cover the sea” from Westminster’s Mission Statement From the President Philadelphia Campus Mailing address: I am delighted to introduce you to Westminster P.O. Box 27009 Theological Seminary! I trust that the following Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19118 pages will provide the information you need to Street address: consider thoughtfully and prayerfully if God would 2960 West Church Road have you study here at Westminster. Glenside, Pennsylvania 19038 We are a thriving community of professors and (215) 887-5511 students seeking to understand the meaning of Scripture and to apply it to all areas of life. (800) 373-0119 That’s why we have three emphases. First, we Fax (215) 887-5404 believe that Reformed theology, as defined by the www.wts.edu Westminster Standards, most accurately represents the teachings of Scripture; therefore, we are unashamedly committed to historic, Extension Campus and Programs of Study Reformed Christianity. Second, proper interpretation of Scripture requires careful Texas Campus scholarship; therefore, we are solidly committed to academic excellence. Third, genuine and effective gospel service requires a heart of love and devotion to Christ; Two Turtle Creek Building therefore, we are deeply committed to spiritual formation. 3838 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 200 With these emphases at the core, we offer a variety of degree programs to train Dallas, Texas 75219 men for ordained ministry and men and women for gospel service. Our graduates (214) 528-8600 serve all over the world as pastors, professors, missionaries, counselors, doctors, Fax (214) 373-0907 translators, writers, church planters, and in many other capacities.
    [Show full text]
  • Why This Universe? Toward a Taxonomy of Possible Explanations
    28 viewing cosmologists, physicists, philosophers, and theologians, asking them, among other ques- Why This tions, “Why This Universe?” From their many answers, and from my own night musings, I have constructed a taxonomy5 that I present here as a heuristic to help get our minds around this Universe? ultimate and perennial question. The Problem to be Solved Toward a Taxonomy In recent years, the search for scientific explana- tions of reality has been energized by increasing of Possible Explanations recognition that the laws of physics and the con- stants that are embedded in these laws all seem ROBERT LAWRENCE KUHN exquisitely “fine tuned” to allow, or to enable, the WHEN I WAS 12, IN THE SUMMER BETWEEN existence of stars and planets and the emergence seventh and eighth grades, a sudden realization of life and mind. If the laws of physics had much struck such fright that I strove desperately to blot differed, if the values of their constants had much it out, to eradicate the disruptive idea as if it changed, or if the initial conditions of the uni- were a lethal mind virus. My body shuddered verse had much varied, what we know to exist with dread; an abyss had yawned open. Five would not exist since all things of size and sub- decades later I feel its frigid blast still. stance would not have formed. Stephen Hawking Why not Nothing? 1 What if everything had presented the problem this way: always been Nothing? Not just emptiness, not just Why is the universe so close to the dividing line blankness, and not just emptiness and blankness between collapsing again and expanding indefinitely? forever, but not even the existence of emptiness, In order to be as close as we are now, the rate of not even the meaning of blankness, and no forev- expansion early on had to be chosen fantastically er.
    [Show full text]
  • POSTMODERN OR PROPOSITIONAL? Robert L
    TMSJ 18/1 (Spring 2007) 3-21 THE NATURE OF TRUTH: POSTMODERN OR PROPOSITIONAL? Robert L. Thomas Professor of New Testament Ernest R. Sandeen laid a foundation for a contemporary concept of truth that was unique among evangelicals with a high view of Scripture. He proposed that the concept of inerrancy based on a literal method of interpretation was late in coming during the Christian era, having its beginning among the Princeton theologians of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He ruled out their doctrines related to inspiration because they were based on rational thinking which he taught was absent from earlier Christian thought. Subsequent evaluations of Sandeen’s work have disproved his assumption that those doctrines were absent from Christianity prior to the Princeton era. Yet well-known Christian writers have since built on Sandeen’s foundation that excludes rationality and precision from an interpretation of Scripture. The Sandeenists criticize the Princetonians for overreacting in their response to modernism, for their use of literal principles of interpretation, for defining propositional truth derived from the Bible, and for excluding the Holy Spirit’s help in interpretation. All such criticisms have proven to be without foundation. The Princetonians were not without fault, but their utilization of common sense in biblical interpretation was their strong virtue. Unfortunately, even the Journal of the inerrantist Evangelical Theological Society has promoted some of the same errors as Sandeen. The divine element in inspiration is a guarantee of the rationality and precision of Scripture, because God, the ultimate author of Scripture, is quite rational and precise, as proven by Scripture itself.
    [Show full text]