DOCSLIB.ORG

Family Noctuidae Latreille, 1809 Subfamily Noctuinae Latreille, 1809

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Family Noctuidae Latreille, 1809 Subfamily Noctuinae Latreille, 1809 Family Noctuidae Latreille, 1809 Subfamily Noctuinae Latreille, 1809 Tribe Noctuini Latreille, 1809 Th e Eugnorisma- Eugraphe generic complex Taxonomy. Th e genus Eugnorisma was erected by Boursin (1946) and Graphiphora insignata (Lederer, 1853) was designated as type species. Th e name of the genus has ancient Greek origin and expresses the cognition of this taxon (gnorisma = proof; anagnorisis = recognition). Th e species belonging to this genus previously have been mentioned mostly as Lycophotia Hübner, 1813 (partim) and Rhyacia Hübner, [1821] 1816 (partim). It belongs to the tribe Noctuini (subtribe Noctuina) (Lafontaine & Schmidt 2010) and is closely related to the genera of the “Gnorisma-complex” ( Sinognorisma Varga & Ronkay, 1987, Protogno- risma Ronkay & Varga 1999, Anagnorisma Ronkay & Varga, 1999, Schizognorisma Ronkay & Varga, 1999, Agnorisma Lafontaine, 1998, Prognorisma Lafontaine, 1998, Opigena Boisduval, 1840, Pseudohermonassa Varga, 1990 and Paramathes Boursin, 1954), but not to Protexarnis McDunnough, 1929 and Parexarnis Boursin, 1946, etc. (= Actebia Stephens, 1829), as suggested by Boursin (1946, 1954). Th is group of genera is also related with a further complex of genera characterised by a sclerotised dentate ribbon at the apex of aedeagus, as in Coenophila Stephens, 1850, Eugraphe Hübner, 1821, Goniographa Varga & Ronkay, 2002, Oligarcha Varga, Ronkay & Gyulai, 1995, Paradiarsia McDunnough, 1929, Protolampra McDunnough, 1929, etc. Ammogrotis Staudinger, 1895 shows also some similar characters of male genitalia; however with presence of small plesiomorphic clavus which is exceptional in the subtribe Noctuina. Lafontaine (1998: 20–21) discussed the taxonomic relationships of Noctuini/ Noctuina genera and essentially confi rmed these results. He outlined 9 larger, probably monophyletic “generic groups” of Noctuina, based on numerous imaginal and larval characters. Th e group (8), called “Abagrotis group” consists of 10 Nearctic/Holarctic genera: Abagrotis Smith, 1890, Adelphagrotis Smith, 1890, Agnorisma, Parabagrotis Lafontaine, 1998, Prognorisma, Pronoctua Smith, 1894, Protolampra, Pseudohermonassa, Setagrotis Smith, 1890 and Tesagrotis Lafontaine, 1998. It was also mentioned that the Palaearctic Eugnorisma and Sinognorisma (latter genus as an “autapomorphic Eugnorisma”) should belong to the same generic group. Two new genera ( Prognorisma and Agnorisma) have been erected and described by him, and this large and obviously rather heterogenous group has been subdivided (Lafontaine 1998: 171–172). Agnorisma, Eugnorisma, Protognorisma, Anagnorisma, Prognorisma, Pseudohermonassa and Sinognorisma are characterised by having a “fi eld of spines at the apex of the aedoeagus” (i.e. ca- rina) that does not extend onto the vesica. Th us, they have been separated from the sixth and seventh group of genera consisting inter alia of Adelphagrotis, Coenophila, Eugraphe, Graphiphora, Parabagro- 18 A TAXONOMIC ATLAS OF THE EURASIAN AND NORTH AFRICAN NOCTUOIDEA tis and Setagrotis in which a narrow, ribbon-like, eversible carinal bar (“spine band”) is extending from the apex of the aedeagus onto the basal part of the vesica, similarly to Xestia Hübner, 1818 and other related genera. Surprisingly, the monotypic genus Oligarcha which was associated with Eugnorisma , also shows this obviously plesiomorphic character (see its presence in Diarsia), though in a specially modifi ed confi guration. Interestingly, in Paramathes both character states, the dentate sclerotised plate and the ribbon-like extension, are combined. In the diverse genus Spaelotis a special trend of modifi ca- tion of this structure can be observed, namely the separation of the distal part of the spine band as a subbasal cornutus or group of cornuti in the vesica. Th e most relevant taxonomical characters mentioned by Lafontaine (1998) are briefl y summarized below, with some comments concerning their taxonomical evaluation. – In Eugnorisma and closely related genera the fi eld of spines on the heavily sclerotised lamina of the carina (“apex of the aedeagus” sensu Lafontaine) is not “ribbon-like” and does not extend ventrally onto the vesica, as opposed to Xestia s.l., Coenophila, Eugraphe, Oligarcha, Ammogrotis, Paradiarsia and Protolampra, etc. However, it may be apparently reduced to a convex, bulbous sclerotisation ( Anagnorisma goniophora and A. zakaria) or strongly reduced ( Eugnorisma trigonica-group), may appear at the ventral surface as a single thorn (E. chaldaica, E. kristenseni and E. spodia), a hooked, fl attened crest (Schizognorisma fuscisignata, S. rhodostola) or may be strongly prolonged apically, projecting inwards the basal part of the vesica (e.g. in certain Eugnorisma and Protognorisma species). –Th e vesica is projecting ventrally (as in many other related genera, which is probably only a symplesio- morphy), but it may project dorsally just within a compact species-group as the E. chaldaica-group, where the three species have ventral tooth at the end of aedeagus, or projecting dorso-laterally in Schizognorisma where the hooked process is situated ventro-laterally. – In Eugnorisma there are some shared characters of the vesica, e.g.: (i) Th e large proximal diverticulum of the vesica with fi ne apical, not bulbed cornutus (contrasting, e.g. to Eugraphe sigma, furthermore Goniographa spp. as G. marcida, G. decussa, G. funkei and their sibling species, but also Miniphila miniago and M. persago, with bulbed cornutus on a rather short di- verticulum, near to the corpus of vesica). Based on this character, the Central Asiatic Goniographa taxa seem to be more closely related to E. sigma (also strictly Palaearctic!) than to the Holarctic Coenophila. (ii) Th e distal, more or less saccate spinulose fi eld is close to the ductus ejaculatorius which is present also in Protognorisma but may be lacking in some species-groups and most of the related genera. – It seems to be a general trend that the distal spinulose fi eld of the vesica is lacking in those Noctuini groups in which the ventral, ribbon-like dentate sclerotisation of carina extends onto the ventrally pro- jected vesica. In those groups, which share the ribbon-like dentate sclerotisation onto the vesica, e.g. Paradiarsia, Coenophila, Eugraphe, Spaelotis, etc., also Xestia s. l., the lack of the spinulose fi eld gener- ally appear as a plesiomorphic character, while in the other generic group, in which the carina shows the “ Eugnorisma”-type but they do not have the distal spinulose fi eld of vesica, this latter structure may be secondarily reduced, as in Anagnorisma and Schizognorisma and also in the subgenus Metagnorisma of Eugnorisma. Th ese characters obviously correlate with the diff erent “technics” of copulation. –Th ere is a “subapical process” (pseudopollex) on the ventral margin of the valva, which is derived from the “ventral angle of the valva” and is not homologous with the pollex of Xestia which is a ventral extension originating from the sclerotised base of the harpe (“clasper” in Lafontaine) that projects below the ventral margin of the valva. Th is pseudopollex of the Eugnorisma-group possibly repre- sents a modifi ed saccular extension, derived from the distal end of the sacculus (see Protognorisma, Schizognorisma and Anagnorisma ). Th is is mostly evident in Schizognorisma, recognizable also in Anagnorisma and in a few other species of Eugnorisma. Furthermore, the scale-like vestiture of the pseudopollex is a synapomorphy of the insignata-group and the trigonica-group in Eugnorisma s. str. and it can be considered as subgeneric character of Eugnorisma s. str. On the other hand, species of the subgenus Metagnorisma do not have any pollex-like valval extension ventrally but have a poste- rior extension of the harpe (clasper) as in Prognorisma , although it is connected to the inner surface of the valva. Th e pollex or any pollex-like extension can also be reduced in several genera, inter alia in the diverse genus Spaelotis but also in the oligotypic Pseudohermonassa and Graphiphora and in the monotypic Ammogrotis and Oligarcha as a homoplasy. VOLUME 8. VARGA, Z., RONKAY, G., RONKAY, L. & GYULAI, P.: NOCTUINAE II. 19 Other characters used for the characterization of the genera of this complex: –Th e third segment of the labial palpus: it is smooth in Eugnorisma and Pseudohermonassa, while Prognorisma and Agnorisma have a ventral tuft on it; in addition, one of the species of Schizognorisma ( rhodostola) has well-developed ventral tuft on third segment, while the other one (S. fuscisignata) has it but smoothly scaled. Th e scaled second segment of Eugnorisma, Schizognorisma, Anagnorisma, Protognorisma and Metagnorisma is characteristically axe-shaped, only its width is variable, while the segment is elongate in Oligarcha and Ammogrotis, with more or less parallel dorsal and ventral margin. In Spaelotis the labial palpus has broad spatulate scales laterally, and longer scales ventrally forming fringe but without apical tuft. –Th e shape of the uncus and its tip is apically fl attened in Agnorisma , but it is fl at, straplike in Prognoris- ma; and various in Eugnorisma. Th is character shows diff erent states even by very closely related spe- cies, e.g. Eugnorisma insignata and E. conformis. Obviously, it may be useful for the characterisation of certain supraspecifi c taxa but it is probably without any phylogenetic signifi cance, due to homoplasic changes (fl attened apex) in diff erent genera and species-groups (e.g. Goniographa , Spaelotis). –Th e presence of signa
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Correct Authorship of Taxa of Lepidoptera, Described In
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Volynkin, A. V.; Yakovlev, R. V. Correct authorship of taxa of Lepidoptera, described in publications by Julius Lederer in 1853 and 1855 from Western Altai (Insecta: Lepidoptera) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 43, núm. 172, diciembre, 2015, pp. 673-681 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45543699011 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative SHILAP Revta. lepid., 43 (172), diciembre 2015: 673-681 eISSN: 2340-4078 ISSN: 0300-5267 Correct authorship of taxa of Lepidoptera, described in publications by Julius Lederer in 1853 and 1855 from Western Altai (Insecta: Lepidoptera) A. V. Volynkin & R. V. Yakovlev Abstract The article considers correct authorship of taxa, described from Kazakhstan Altai in works by Julius Lederer in 1853 and 1855. The real author to 12 among 54 taxa, described in the works, is proved to be Albert Kindermann. KEY WORDS: Insecta, Lepidoptera, Lederer, Kindermann, authorship, Kazakhstan, Altai, Russia. Autoría correcta de taxones de Lepidoptera, descritas en las publicaciones de Julius Lederer en 1853 y 1855 del oeste de Altai (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Resumen Se aclara la autoría de los taxones de Lepidoptera descritos a partir de los artículos del oeste de Altái por Julius Lederer en 1853 y 1855. Está comprobado que el author real de 12 de las 54 taxa que se describen en los trabajos, es Albert Kindermann.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 10 (3) : 140-157 ; 31.X.1987 ISSN 0342-7536 A revision of the holarctic Chersotis andereggii complex (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) Kauri Mikkola, J. D. Lafontaine & Paul Grotenfelt K- Mikkola, Department of Zoology, University of Helsinki, P. Rautatiekatu 13, SF-00100 Helsinki, Finland J. D. Lafontaine, Biosystematics Research Center, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada P. Grotenfelt, Rantamajantie 8, SF-02700 Kauniainen, Finland Summary In the Palaearctic region, Chersotis andereggii auct. has been found to include three species differing from each other mainly in male genital structures and in geographi- cal range. C. andereggii (Boisduval, 1834) occurs from Europe eastward to the Central Asiatic and Siberian mountains ; the isolated Baltic population differs in appearance from that of the Alps and is described as a new subspecies. C acutangula (Staudinger, 1892) stat. n. occurs in the Central Asiatic mountains. C. juncta (Grote, 1878) is widely distributed in North America (the only Nearctic Chersotis), and is now reported from the eastern Palaearctic, having earlier been misidentified as C andereggii. Adults and male genital structures of all three species, as well as the male genitalia of C. reetangida (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775), are described and illustrated, and the phylogeny of the group is discussed. Lectotypes are designated for C. andereggii, C acutangula and C exclamans (Eversmann, 1841), a junior synonym of C andereggii. C sjuntensis Kuznetzov, 1958 is possibly a distinct species near C. reetangida, and C hampsoni (A. Bang-Haas, 1910) comb, n. is transferred to the genus Chersotis. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Native Animals of RI
    RARE NATIVE ANIMALS OF RHODE ISLAND Revised: March, 2006 ABOUT THIS LIST The list is divided by vertebrates and invertebrates and is arranged taxonomically according to the recognized authority cited before each group. Appropriate synonomy is included where names have changed since publication of the cited authority. The Natural Heritage Program's Rare Native Plants of Rhode Island includes an estimate of the number of "extant populations" for each listed plant species, a figure which has been helpful in assessing the health of each species. Because animals are mobile, some exhibiting annual long-distance migrations, it is not possible to derive a population index that can be applied to all animal groups. The status assigned to each species (see definitions below) provides some indication of its range, relative abundance, and vulnerability to decline. More specific and pertinent data is available from the Natural Heritage Program, the Rhode Island Endangered Species Program, and the Rhode Island Natural History Survey. STATUS. The status of each species is designated by letter codes as defined: (FE) Federally Endangered (7 species currently listed) (FT) Federally Threatened (2 species currently listed) (SE) State Endangered Native species in imminent danger of extirpation from Rhode Island. These taxa may meet one or more of the following criteria: 1. Formerly considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Federal listing as endangered or threatened. 2. Known from an estimated 1-2 total populations in the state. 3. Apparently globally rare or threatened; estimated at 100 or fewer populations range-wide. Animals listed as State Endangered are protected under the provisions of the Rhode Island State Endangered Species Act, Title 20 of the General Laws of the State of Rhode Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Checklist of the Genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946 of Iran with New Records and Distributional Data (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Rabieh, M. M.; Seraj, A. A.; Gyulai, P.; Esfandiari, M. Checklist of the genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946 of Iran with new records and distributional data (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Noctuinae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 41, núm. 163, septiembre, 2013, pp. 399-413 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45529269018 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 399-413 Checklist of the Eugno 4/9/13 12:16 Página 399 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 41 (163), septiembre 2013: 399-413 eISSN: 2340-4078 ISSN: 0300-5267 Checklist of the genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946 of Iran with new records and distributional data (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Noctuinae) M. M. Rabieh, A. A. Seraj, P. Gyulai & M. Esfandiari Abstract A checklist of 9 species and 4 subspecies of the genus Eugnorisma Boursin, 1946, in Iran, with remarks, is presented based on the literature and our research results. Furthermore 1 species and 4 subspecies are discussed, as formerly erroneously published taxons from Iran, because of misidentification or mislabeling. Two further subspecies, E. insignata leuconeura (Hampson, 1918) and E. insignata pallescens Christoph, 1893, formerly treated as valid taxons, are downgraded to mere form, both of them occurring in Iran. New data on the distribution of some species of this genus in Iran are also given.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist
    Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist Prepared by J.A. Powell, Essig Museum of Entomology, UC Berkeley. For a description of the Big Creek Lepidoptera Survey, see Powell, J.A. Big Creek Reserve Lepidoptera Survey: Recovery of Populations after the 1985 Rat Creek Fire. In Views of a Coastal Wilderness: 20 Years of Research at Big Creek Reserve. (copies available at the reserve). family genus species subspecies author Acrolepiidae Acrolepiopsis californica Gaedicke Adelidae Adela flammeusella Chambers Adelidae Adela punctiferella Walsingham Adelidae Adela septentrionella Walsingham Adelidae Adela trigrapha Zeller Alucitidae Alucita hexadactyla Linnaeus Arctiidae Apantesis ornata (Packard) Arctiidae Apantesis proxima (Guerin-Meneville) Arctiidae Arachnis picta Packard Arctiidae Cisthene deserta (Felder) Arctiidae Cisthene faustinula (Boisduval) Arctiidae Cisthene liberomacula (Dyar) Arctiidae Gnophaela latipennis (Boisduval) Arctiidae Hemihyalea edwardsii (Packard) Arctiidae Lophocampa maculata Harris Arctiidae Lycomorpha grotei (Packard) Arctiidae Spilosoma vagans (Boisduval) Arctiidae Spilosoma vestalis Packard Argyresthiidae Argyresthia cupressella Walsingham Argyresthiidae Argyresthia franciscella Busck Argyresthiidae Argyresthia sp. (gray) Blastobasidae ?genus Blastobasidae Blastobasis ?glandulella (Riley) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.1) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.2) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.3) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.4) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.5) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.6) Blastobasidae Holcocera gigantella (Chambers) Blastobasidae
    [Show full text]
  • Macrolepidoptera Inventory of the Chilcotin District
    Macrolepidoptera Inventory of the Chilcotin District Aud I. Fischer – Biologist Jon H. Shepard - Research Scientist and Crispin S. Guppy – Research Scientist January 31, 2000 2 Abstract This study was undertaken to learn more of the distribution, status and habitat requirements of B.C. macrolepidoptera (butterflies and the larger moths), the group of insects given the highest priority by the BC Environment Conservation Center. The study was conducted in the Chilcotin District near Williams Lake and Riske Creek in central B.C. The study area contains a wide variety of habitats, including rare habitat types that elsewhere occur only in the Lillooet-Lytton area of the Fraser Canyon and, in some cases, the Southern Interior. Specimens were collected with light traps and by aerial net. A total of 538 species of macrolepidoptera were identified during the two years of the project, which is 96% of the estimated total number of species in the study area. There were 29,689 specimens collected, and 9,988 records of the number of specimens of each species captured on each date at each sample site. A list of the species recorded from the Chilcotin is provided, with a summary of provincial and global distributions. The habitats, at site series level as TEM mapped, are provided for each sample. A subset of the data was provided to the Ministry of Forests (Research Section, Williams Lake) for use in a Flamulated Owl study. A voucher collection of 2,526 moth and butterfly specimens was deposited in the Royal BC Museum. There were 25 species that are rare in BC, with most known only from the Riske Creek area.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Xestia (Radddea) Alexis
    Zootaxa 3590: 51–62 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EDCF20FD-2E07-416C-AE2D-7260E09D5B05 A revision of the Xestia (Radddea) alexis (Kozhanchikov, 1928) species-group with a checklist of subgenus Raddea Alphéraky, 1892 and description of brachipterous females (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Noctuinae) VLADIMIR S. KONONENKO1, ANTON V. VOLYNKIN2 & ALEXEI YU. MATOV3 1Laboratory of Entomology, Institute of Biology and Soil Science Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, RF-690022 Vladivostok, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2Tigirek State Nature Reserve, Nikitina str. 111, RF-656049, Barnaul, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Laboratory of Entomology, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences RF-199034 Sankt-Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract The subgenus Raddea Alphéraky, 1892 of the genus Xestia Hübner, 1818 is reviewed. A checklist of 29 described species is presented, with 26 new combinations (comb. n.) introduced. Two taxa, Xestia (Raddea) alexis (Kozhanchikov, 1928) and Xestia (Raddea) herrichschaefferi (Alphéraky, 1895) are revised, and three new synonyms are introduced (X. alexis (Kozhanchikov, 1928) = Estimata oschi Kozhanchikov, 1937, syn. n.; = Estimata militzae Kozhanchikov, 1937 syn. n.; Protolampra sobrina (Duponchel, 1843) = Estimata dailingensis Chen, 1984, syn. n.). The name alexis Kozhanchikov, 1937 is recognized as unjustified emendation. Lectotypes for X. alexis and X. herrichschaefferi are designated; brac- hypterous females for X. alexii and X. herrichschaefferi are described. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Noctuinae, Xestia, Raddea, Estimata, taxonomic notes, new synonymy, new com- bination, Russia, South Siberia Introduction Xestia Hübner, 1818 (type-species Noctua ochreago Hübner, 1790) is the largest genus of the tribe Noctuini (Noctuidae) with about 200 species occurring around the World.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve
    SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 159 SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Doug Macaulay Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159 Project Partners: i ISBN 978-1-4601-3449-8 ISSN 1496-7146 Photo: Doug Macaulay of Pale Yellow Dune Moth ( Copablepharon grandis ) For copies of this report, visit our website at: http://www.aep.gov.ab.ca/fw/speciesatrisk/index.html This publication may be cited as: Macaulay, A. D. 2016. Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve. Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159. Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB. 31 pp. ii DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies of the Department or the Alberta Government. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]