Wind Turbine Update (Provided by Richard Cox - Status As of 16 June 2011)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wind Turbine Update (Provided by Richard Cox - Status As of 16 June 2011) Wind Turbine Update (Provided by Richard Cox - Status as of 16 June 2011) Since the 27 January update there has been several important wind turbine developments affecting Crick. Located within 10km (6.2miles) of Crick church there are now 2 turbines operating, 19 turbines permitted awaiting construction with another 33 turbines in the planning process, a total of 54 turbines with many more beyond 10km. Crick is about to be surrounded by these huge wind turbines and a wind turbine landscape created. In the local area (affecting Daventry District) the current total is up from the 68 turbines reported on 27 Jan to 102 turbines today (see table) and expected to increase further. Most Crick residents will now be familiar with the two Tesco turbines operating at DIRFT. These new landmarks provide a foretaste of things to come. The Tesco turbines are 88 metres (288ft) in height with a rotor diameter of 48 metres (157ft). However, these will be dwarfed by the eight Yelvertoft turbines that have planning permission and the DIRFT Airvolution turbines if they are approved. These will be significantly higher and with a 90 metre (295ft) rotor diameter they will appear three and a half times larger. Wind Turbine Locations – June 2011 A critical development for Crick residents is the Planning Appeal by Volkswind over the decision by DDC to reject the Watford Lodge wind farm planning application. A Public Inquiry will now take place, possibly during October. These turbines if approved will be located within a mile of the southern edge of Crick so are closer to the village than either the Yelvertoft or TESCO turbines. At 126.5m (415ft) all five will be highly visible from Crick and will most likely cause a noise nuisance. Of equal impact to some Crick residents is the proposal by Airvolution to build two wind turbines besides the M1 just south of J18. These will be located within half a mile of the western edge of Crick and at 110m in height and 90m rotor diameter will dominate the currently unspoilt view towards Kilsby. They are also highly likely to cause a noise nuisance for Crick residents. The type of low frequency beating noise produced by wind turbines is similar in nature to what many of us have experienced recently coming from the Gazeley / Butchers Pet Care (BPC) site. The BPC noise was a highly intrusive beating noise and although not especially loud and very localised it was particularly annoying at night for those affected. It was able to travel considerable distances and caused noise complaints from as far away as West Haddon. It took over a year to locate the noise source and then have it silenced by the Environment Agency. Unfortunately getting resolution to wind turbine noise complaints is not so easy. In fact to date none of the many wind turbine noise complaints across the country have been satisfactorily resolved due to the ineffective noise regulations (created by the wind power industry) applying to wind turbines. Anyone watching the recent BBC2 documentary series titled ‘Wind Farm Wars’ will be aware of some of the issues. Some other local developments affecting Crick include: Gamesa has recently announced their intention to build the Watford Gap wind farm consisting of 7 wind turbines of 126m height on land just South of Watford besides the M1. All seven turbines will be highly visible from Crick. Also there are two additional wind turbine planning applications submitted to DDC, each for two wind turbines bordering the Watford Gap wind farm. At Two Hides farm, Watford the proposal is for two turbines of 24.5m in height and at White Barn Farm, Long Buckby for two turbines of 71m in height. Cetis has reduced the number of turbines from 8 to 6 proposed for Lilbourne. Scottish and Southern have submitted their planning application to Rugby Borough Council for 9 turbines of 126m in height for the Bransford Bridge, Churchover wind farm. E.ON has recently appealed the decision by DDC to reject the Kelmarsh wind farm. A public inquiry will take place, possibly during September. The four Low Spinney turbines have now been built for over 2 months but are awaiting a grid connection before they can begin operation. These 125m high turbines although located over 10 miles away are clearly visible from parts of Crick and the surrounding area. The Harrington wind turbines were rejected by DDC and following a planning appeal. However, we now understand that Nuon will be submitting a new planning application for 3 similar turbines at the same site. Lobbying at Westminster by our MP Chris Heaton-Harris and other local MPs against inappropriately sited wind turbines (Northamptonshire is one of the lowest wind resource parts of the UK) is gradually gaining momentum and is now influencing Government policy. It is expected that the ROC wind power subsidy (currently adding £200 to the average electricity bill) will be reduced and the Localisation Bill currently going through parliament will give local people and Parish Councils a much greater say in planning decisions. However, for most of the current batch of planning applications, these regulatory and planning changes will come too late as developers have rushed their applications to beat the changes in legislation. We see this with other developments affecting Crick, specifically DIRFT 3, SUE (the 6,200 houses on the BT aerial site that will join DIRFT with Rugby) and more recently the proposed development for 135 houses on the NW edge of Crick, (removing the remaining area of green belt between Crick and the M1/industrial estates). If these developments concern you then please contact to the Parish Council or write to your MP, Chris Heaton-Harris (email: [email protected]). Without robust local opposition these developments will almost certainly go ahead, permanently industrialising and urbanising our village environment. Wind Power Developer No. Turbine Height in Status Distance to Development Turbines MW metres Crick church Crick DIRFT Tesco 1 0.8 88 Operational 1.5km/0.9m Kilsby DIRFT Tesco 1 0.8 88 Operational 2.4km/1.5m Crick DIRFT Airvolution 2 2 110 Application expected July 1.0km/0.6m Yelvertoft Your Energy 8 2.5 125 Approved on Appeal (DDC) 3km/1.9m Lilbourne Cetis for 6 2 125 DDC Planning application 3km/1.9m HEMEX Watford Volkswind 5 2.5 126.5 Refused by DDC. Appeal in 2km/1.2m Lodge progress Watford Gap Gamesa 7 2 126 Planning application to DDC 5km/3.1m expected June/July Winwick E.ON 7 2.5 126.5 DDC Planning application 5km/3.1m Two Hides Bowler 2 0.011 24.5 DDC Planning application 4km/2.5m farm, Watford Energy for H Gilbert White Barn ICE for JO 2 0.25 71 DDC planning application 6km/3.7m farm, Long Adams Buckby Swinford Nuon 11 2.5 125 Approved on Appeal (HDC) 9km/5.6m Kelmarsh E.ON 7 2.5 126.5 Refused by DDC. Appeal in 13km/8m progress Low Spinney Broadview 4 2.5 125 Built but not operational - 16.5km/10.2m HDC N. Kilworth Wind Direct 1 2 126 Lapsed - new application 11km/6.8m for J Miles expected - HDC Harrington Nuon 3 2.5 126 New application expected - 18.5km/11.5m DDC Churchover SSE 9 2 126 Planning application - RBC 11km/6.8m Copston SSE 6 2 125 Planning application to RBC 19.5km/12.1m Magna expected Long Buckby Ashby Anemometer planning 7.0km/4.3m Farms permission Boddington PFR 1 1.5 122 DDC planning application 22km/13.7m Reservoir Beacon Hill TCI 6 2.5 130 Planning application to 17km/10.6m Shuckborough SoADC expected Wormleighton EDF 13 2 126 Development (SoADC) 24km/15m Potential number of 102 turbines Daventry District (and adjoining areas) Wind Power Developments – June 2011 (DDC = Daventry District Council; RBC = Rugby Borough Council; HDC = Harborough District Council, SoADC = Stratford on Avon District Council) .
Recommended publications
  • TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 the Movers and Shakers in Wind
    2016 Top 100 Power People 1 TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 The movers and shakers in wind Featuring interviews with Samuel Leupold from Dong Energy and Ian Mays from RES Group © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Contents 2 CONTENTS Compiling the Top 100: Advisory panel and ranking process 4 Interview: Dong Energy’s Samuel Leupold discusses offshore 6 Top 100 breakdown: Statistics on this year’s table 11 Profiles: Numbers 100 to 41 13 Interview: A Word About Wind meets RES Group’s Ian Mays 21 Profiles: Numbers 40 to 6 26 Top five profiles:The most influential people in global wind 30 Top 100 list: The full Top 100 Power People for 2016 32 Next year: Key dates for your diary in 2017 34 21 Facing the future: Ian Mays on RES Group’s plans after his retirement © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Editorial 3 EDITORIAL resident Donald Trump. It is one of The company’s success in driving down the Pthe biggest shocks in US presidential costs of offshore wind over the last year history but, in 2017, Trump is set to be the owes a great debt to Leupold’s background new incumbent in the White House. working for ABB and other big firms. Turn to page 6 now if you want to read the The prospect of operating under a climate- whole interview. change-denying serial wind farm objector will not fill the US wind sector with much And second, we went to meet Ian Mays joy.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Release Axpo Subsidiary Volkswind Puts New Wind Farm Into
    Media Release 9 June 2017 Axpo subsidiary Volkswind puts new wind farm into operation in France Volkswind GmbH, a 100-per cent subsidiary of Axpo, has put the new Massay 2 wind farm into operation in France. The wind farm includes 7 turbines with an output of 3.3 MW each, and is located 100 kilometres south of Orleans. The rotor blades on the individual wind turbines reach a height of 175 metres. Massay 2 is one of the highest wind power plants in France and generates power for some 20,000 people. The Massay 2 wind farm, which was inaugurated in a small ceremony on Friday, 9 June 2017, is located near the community of Vierzon (Centre/Val de Loire region). The wind farm will produce an annual average power volume of about 52.4 GWh, which is sufficient to supply some 20,000 people with electricity. The 7 wind turbines have a hub height of 119 metres, and the Vestas V112 turbine rotor blades measure 56 metres. The plant with a total height of 175 metres is the tallest wind power plant in the Centre region. Increased construction of wind energy plants In addition to Massay 2, the Axpo subsidiary Volkswind also put two other wind farms (Availles Thouarsais Irais and Trans-Courcité) into operation this year. Construction of three more wind farms (Lichères-Pres-Aigremont, Périgné and Elarg. Louville) will be completed by the end of 2017. All six facilities with a total of 35 wind turbines are located in Central and Western France and have an installed capacity of 88 MW.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Turbines and Proximity to Homes
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wind Turbines and Proximity! to Homes: The Impact of Wind Turbine Noise on Health a review of the literature & discussion of the issues ! ! ! by! ! Barbara J Frey, BA, MA (University of Minnesota) & Peter J Hadden, BSc (Est Man), FRICS January 2012 Health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease and infirmity. -- The World Health Organization Charter The objective of science is not agreement on a course of action, but the pursuit of truth. -- John Kay (2007) First, Do No Harm. -- The Hippocratic Oath ! "! Table of Contents ! Acknowledgements 3 Preface 4 Introduction 5 Chapter 1 Wind Turbines built near Homes: the Effects on People 8 Appendix 1: People’s Health Experiences: Additional References 21 Chapter 2 Wind Turbine Noise and Guidance 22 2.1 Wind turbine noise 22 2.2 Wind turbine noise guidance 38 2.3 Wind turbine noise: Guidance process 43 2.4 Wind turbine noise: Low frequency noise (LFN) 54 2.5 Wind turbine noise: Amplitude modulation (AM) 60 Appendix 2: Wind Turbine Noise & Guidance: Additional References 65 Chapter 3 Wind Turbine Noise: Impacts on Health 67 3.1 Wind turbine noise and its impacts on health, sleep, and cognition 67 3.2 Wind turbine noise: Clinical studies and counterclaims 92 Appendix 3.1 Health: International Perspectives 101 Appendix 3.2 Health: Additional References 102 Chapter 4 Wind Turbine Noise and Human Rights 103 4.1 Potential violations 103 4.2 The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights 112 4.3 State Indifference to
    [Show full text]
  • M&A Facts – Special Edition Windenergy Hamburg 2020
    M&A Facts – Special Edition WindEnergy Hamburg 2020 Wind Energy Industry M&A-Highlights and Market Insights Data source: S&P Capital IQ, desktop research. Analysis by Proventis Partners. ►This brief study was drafted by Proventis Partners with the aim to provide a high-quality analysis of the wind energy industry with respect to company valuations as well as M&A activities. It includes analyses of respective peer group trading multiples and selected transactions. Wind energy is not a homogeneous industry; business models and profitability levels differ, and consequently so do valuations. This is reflected by our approach to divide the industry in four segments, reflecting individual stages of the wind energy value chain: 1) Wind Turbine Generator (“WTG”) Manufacturers, 2) Wind Turbine Component Suppliers, 3) Wind Park Developers 4) Wind Park Operation, Maintenance and Service Providers. ►Valuations of publicly-listed companies in the WTG manufacturing- and the supplier segment weakened during the first half of 2020, as the uncertainties surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic affected stock market valuations across the globe. Trading multiples of WTG manufacturers were effected stronger than other segments. However, renewable energy generation is one of the few sectors that are widely considered to emerge stronger from the crisis. Historical high valuation levels of >30x TEV/EBITDA for our European peer group of wind park developers seem to confirm this thesis. 1. Global Wind Turbine Generator Manufacturers Peer Group Note: TEV = Total Enterprise Value. LTM = Last Twelve Months. HY = Half-Year. Data source: S&P Capital IQ. In €m. Global WTG Manufacturers segment includes the leading publicly listed manufacturing companies.
    [Show full text]
  • March 9, 2015
    Nebraska Wind Energy and Wildlife News March 9, 2015 Around Nebraska… It is Legislative Session time again! The first day of the 2015 session was on January 7, 2015. Several bills related to energy and transmission have been introduced. Please let me know if I have missed any relevant bills. The Nebraska Legislative Bills are listed at the end of the message. COMMENT DEADLINE MARCH 31, 2015: MITIGATION GUIDELINES FOR WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN NEBRASKA The Mitigation Guidelines for Wind Energy Development in Nebraska were developed to standardize the mitigation process. Wind energy developers will be provided a better idea of what mitigation, if any, will likely be recommended for wind energy facilities developed in different parts of the state. The Guidelines were developed by representatives from a variety of stakeholder groups and now, we want your input. The document is currently in working draft format. All comments submitted to [email protected] in the next six months will be compiled. Updates will be made in April 2015. Questions? Contact Caroline Jezierski @ 402-472-8188 or [email protected]. http://snr.unl.edu/renewableenergy/wind/tools.asp#mitigation Report: Solar, wind energy has huge potential in state. Nebraska wind and solar advocates said last week that renewable energy has the potential to supply almost 75 percent of the state’s needs. A new report produced by the Wind Energy Foundation, Creighton University and Washington-based consultants David Gardiner and Associates said “significant cost declines” for electricity generated by wind and solar power is spurring development in Nebraska and nationwide. (http://www.theindependent.com/news/business/report-solar-wind-energy-has-huge-potential-in- state/article_5f41ff0c-b95e-11e4-aaf2-d72cdd328fdc.html).
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Wind Observatory
    2019 WIND OBSERVATORY Analysis of the French wind power industry: market, jobs and challenges APPENDIXES CHALLENGES JOBS MARKET 2 Foreword The French energy landscape is gradually shifting towards renewable energies. Ambitious targets have been set, aiming to increase the share of renewables to 33% of the energy mix and 40% of power generation by 2030. Wind power clearly stands out, as a key sector, alongside solar energy, faced with new challenges and offering high expectations. As the Multiannual Energy Programming is about to be disclosed, wind power (both onshore and offshore), is regarded as one of the cornerstones of the energy transition in the French power mix. Over the past year, wind power has indeed covered 6% of France’s power needs. The industry has also demonstrated its competitiveness in relation to the latest calls for tenders, specifically with regards to the wind farm awarded off Dunkirk. In this buoyant context, wind energy is also a major driver of regional economic development and employment, with a 6.4% increase in jobs in 2018. The industry must, however, continue to improve project integration in terms of local territories, the environment, and the landscape. The current development dynamic is confirmed in the Multiannual Energy Programming, which sets ambitious targets for 2028 through the installation of the first offshore wind farms. The French Parliament has scaled up its ambitions in terms of the development of offshore wind power generation and now aims to award 1 GW per year by 2024. APPENDIXES CHALLENGES JOBS MARKET 3 Foreword The industry can count on the support of the French Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Wind Technology Cluster Microeconomics of Competitiveness
    The German Wind Technology Cluster Microeconomics of Competitiveness April 27, 2010 AUTHORS Ralf Boeckle, Mehak Dua, Diogo Henriques, Patrick Simon & Francesco Tronci Harvard Business School / Harvard Kennedy School of Government The German Wind Technology Cluster 1. Country Analysis 1.1 National Economic Performance: Germany is a federal republic with 16 states, situated in the center of Europe. With a population of 82 million people and a size of 357,000km2, its 6,000km border includes a coastline of 2,400km. Following the cold war and after a peaceful revolution in Eastern Germany, the country was reunified in 1990. More than twenty years on, stark regional imbalances still persist, with western states in general more prosperous than their eastern neighbors. Germany is a key player in the European Union and considered its economic engine with the highest gross domestic product among all members, totaling US$3.6 trillion in 2008 (World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2009). Germany’s GDP per capita of around US$33,500 (in PPP), ranks it slightly above the European Union average. Given its membership of the European Union and its structure as a federal state, political decision-making in Germany is spread through several levels: European institutions prescribe approximately 50% of Germans laws, the European Central Bank sets the monetary policy and the European Commission and the European Parliament define the rules on trade, common market, environment, agriculture and increasingly so on domestic security. The European Court is accessible to every citizen and its rulings are binding on all member States. The federal government has its main competencies in the areas of tax and economic policy, foreign policy and then energy policy, labor market and social welfare, while the state level in Germany is exclusively responsible for education, including universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Wind Energy in Montana
    2018 Status of Wind Energy in Montana MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING - WIND APPLICATIONS CENTER | Aaron Bugh, Dr. Robb Larson Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 2 National Electrical Production Overview ........................................................................................ 3 National Wind Energy Production Overview .................................................................................. 5 Montana Electrical Production Overview ....................................................................................... 6 Montana Wind Energy Production Overview ................................................................................. 7 Wind Energy Benefits .................................................................................................................. 8 Wind Resource Potential ............................................................................................................ 9 Montana Wind Power Production ............................................................................................ 10 Operational Utility Scale Wind Energy Facilities ....................................................................... 12 Judith Gap Wind Energy Center ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Farms.Pdf
    1 2 EU Guidance on wind energy development in accordance with the EU nature legislation This document reflects the view of the Commission services and is not of a binding nature. European Commission, October 2010 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Photo: istockphoto This document has been prepared with the assistance of Ecosystems LTD (part of the N2K Group EEIG) under contract to the European Commission (contract N° 070307/2008/513837/SER/B2). It has also greatly benefitted from discussions with, and information supplied by, experts from Member States and key stakeholder groups, within the framework of an ad hoc group on wind energy and nature conservation. EU Guidance on wind energy development in accordance with the EU nature legislation 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDANCE ....................................................................... p 5 1. WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENTS IN THE EU ............................................. p 7 1.1 Wind energy in Europe – 20 years of sustained growth ...................................... p 7 1.2 The EU Policy Framework for promoting renewable energy sources.................. p 8 1.3 Wind power development: predictions for 2020 and beyond .............................. p 9 1.4 Wind energy development in different Member States ....................................... p 10 1.5 Offshore wind power ........................................................................................... p 11 1.6 Balancing wind farm developments with broader societal needs ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew R. Lines, MAI Principal Valuation Advisory Services, Cohnreznick LLP 200 S
    Andrew R. Lines, MAI Principal Valuation Advisory Services, CohnReznick LLP 200 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2600, Chicago, IL 60606 312-508-5892 [email protected] Professional Affiliations Licenses and Accreditations • Member of the Institute of Real Estate Management (IREM) • Member of the Appraisal Institute (MAI) • Member of the National Council of Real Estate Investment • Certified General Real Estate Appraiser in the states of: Fiduciaries (NCREIF) Illinois Indiana Education Ohio • Syracuse University – BFA Arizona New York New Jersey Impact Studies Maryland Florida • Landfills Georgia • Waste Transfer Stations Michigan • Big Box Retail District of Columbia • Transmission Lines • Zoning Overlay districts • Truck Terminals 3 Dayton Griffin Head of Section, Wind Technology Mobile: +1 425 422 8794 Email: [email protected] Summary Mr. Griffin has 25 years of wind-energy engineering experience and in 2017 assumed the role of Head of Section for DNV GL’s Wind Technology team. He is an internationally-recognized expert in the area of wind turbine blades, with a background including all aspects of rotor blade aerodynamics, structure, materials, and manufacturing technologies. He has worked on numerous detailed due diligence evaluations including turbine systems, service providers, engineering, manufacturing, operation and maintenance for both onshore and offshore projects in North and South America, Europe, and Asia. Mr. Griffin also has extensive experience in conducting wind turbine blade failure and damage investigations
    [Show full text]
  • Joe Wood with Volkswind Addresses Several Topics and Questions Asked by Members of the Working Group from the March 12Th Meeting
    Information from Joe Wood Joe Wood with Volkswind addresses several topics and questions asked by members of the Working th Group from the March 12 meeting: • Does it make a difference about costs in a public power state? >> Cost of procuring energy resources by public power is not substantially different from that of any other type of power utility (the difference is in the ownership of the utility – for example an investor- owned utility would be regulated but could earn a state-allowed return on its assets, whereas public power is presumably owned by its members, like a cooperative; its elected Board making key decisions). Power cost drivers in Nebraska are the same as those in any other state. Cost of fuel-based energy (coals, gas, etc.) is a function of the cost of fuel. Emissions policy also drives cost. Fuel-based energy must comply with emissions standards. As emissions standard rise, cost will rise. As wind energy requires no fuel, the main factors are capital cost and productivity. We have seen capital cost of wind energy fall by over 50% in the last 5 years. Moreover, in Nebraska where the wind resource is well above average, energy costs are further driven down by productivity (a given level of capital cost is producing more energy). Here is a good source of information and excellent charts relating to cost-impact of wind energy: http://www.awea.org/Resources/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=5547#CostofWindEnergy • Where do wind energy taxes go? >> Wind energy projects will generally have two primary types of tax in Nebraska: Nameplate capacity tax and real property tax.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Profundo
    Undermining our future A study of banks’ investments in selected companies attributable to fossil fuels and renewable energy A Fair Finance Guide International case study Embargo au jeudi 5 novembre 2015 00H01GMT Undermining our future A study of banks’ investments in selected companies attributable to fossil fuels and renewable energy A Fair Finance Guide International case study Ward Warmerdam Alexandra Christopoulou Anniek Herder Charissa Bosma Joeri de Wilde Michel Riemersma Jan Willem van Gelder With contributions by: Victoria Fanggidae, Evert Hassink, Petra Hamers, Soren Henriksen, Jakob König, Yann Louvel, Jesper Stegmann, Alexandre Naulot, Yuki Tanabe, Guilherme Teixeira, Frank Vanaerschot, Gine Zwart 2 November 2015 Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................... i Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1 Background ...................................................................................... 2 1.1 What is at stake? ....................................................................................... 2 1.2 International initiatives ............................................................................. 4 Chapter 2 Methodology ..................................................................................... 9 2.1 Approach ................................................................................................... 9 2.2
    [Show full text]