A Taphonomic Treatment of Thule Zooarchaeological Ma Terials from Diana Bay, Nunavik (Arctic Quebec)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A TAPHONOMIC TREATMENT OF THULE ZOOARCHAEOLOGICAL MA TERIALS FROM DIANA BAY, NUNAVIK (ARCTIC QUEBEC) by Susan E. Lofthouse Department of Anthropology McGill University, Montréal A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts October 2003 © Susan Lofthouse 2003 Library and Bibliothèque et 1+1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 0-612-98463-X Our file Notre référence ISBN: 0-612-98463-X NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans loan, distribute and sell th es es le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non sur support microforme, papier, électronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. reproduced without the author's permission. ln compliance with the Canadian Conformément à la loi canadienne Privacy Act some supporting sur la protection de la vie privée, forms may have been removed quelques formulaires secondaires from this thesis. ont été enlevés de cette thèse. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires in the document page count, aient inclus dans la pagination, their removal does not represent il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant. any loss of content from the thesis. ••• Canada Abstract This thesis presents a taphonomic analysis of a zooarchaeological assemblage excavated from HEI-lO, a Thule site located near modern Quaqtaq in Nunavik. Little is known of the Thule occupation of Nunavik, and even less concerning Thule subsistence activities here. As a result, this is one of the first detailed zooarchaeological analyses performed on Thule archaeofaunas from the Ungava region. Because of the poor preservation that characterized the assemblage, a taphonomic study was undertaken in order to determine the "representativeness" of the faunal remains. Food utility indices are compared to bone density indices, in order to establish the effects of density-mediated attrition upon the faunal remains. A moderate correlation was found between bone density and the identified animal bones. This indicated that, while density-mediated attrition had altered the zooarchaeological assemblage, bone density alone did not provide a sufficient explanation for the observed element distributions. Other taphonomic agents, su ch as those related to the degree of butchering and the potential effects of cryoturbation upon remains, also need to be taken into consideration. Resumé Cette thèse présente l'analyse taphonomique d'un assemblage zoo archéologique de la fouille du site HEI-lO près de Quaqtaq à Nunavik. L'occupation Thule au Nunavik est très mal connue, et le mode de vie Thule en Nunavik est encore moins bien connu. Le présent travail est l'une des premières analyses zooarchéologiques detaillées éffectuées sur l'archéofaune Thule de la region d'Ungava. À cause de la piètre préservation qui charactérise l'assemblage, une étude taphonomique a été entreprise pour déterminer ce que les ossements fauniques représentent. Les indices d'utilité alimentaire sont comparés aux indices de la densité des ossements, dans le but de déterminer les effets sur l'assemblage de l'attrition modifiée selon la densité des restes. Une corrélation spatiale modérée a pu être établie entre la densité des ossements et la proportion d'ossements identifiés. Ceci indique que, même si l'attrition modifiée selon la densité a changé l'assemblage archéologique, la densité des ossements ne suffit pas à elle seule à expliquer les elements de distribution observés. D'autres agents taphonomiques, comme par example ceux reliés au degré de dépeçage et des effets potentiels de cryoturbation sur les ossements, doivent aussi être considérés. Il Acknowledgements Thanks go first and foremost to the community of Quaqtaq for permitting our archaeological investigations on lllutalialuk, and particularly to the members of the 2002 field crew. David Oovaut, Johnny Okpik and Susie Jararusie made sure our bellies were always full. Thanks also to aIl of the students for their hard work: Jeannie Arnatuk, Susie Arnatuk, Jobie Aupaluk, Monica Ezekiel, Billie Keleutak, Stevie Pagé, Putulik Puttayuk, Susana Puttayuk, Pierre St.-Cyr, Aita Tukkiapik and Lisa Tukkiapik. Thank you to A vataq Cultural Institute for organizing the 2002 field season and allowing me to be involved. Special thanks go to the Community-University Research Alliance Project for funding the fieldwork, and providing financial support during my M.A. degree in the form of a research assistantship. Aiso to the Northern Scientific Training Pro gram for helping to finance the field season. I am grateful to aIl of the individuals involved in CURA who made this project enjoyable. Thanks to Claude Pinard for his help both in and out of the field in obtaining information relevant to my research, and also for supplying access to the 1974 artifact and faunal assemblage. Thank you to Amélie Langlais and Louis Gilbert for their help and company in the field. And more thanks than words permit to John Beaten and Christine Iorio for their hard work, perseverance and camaraderie - but most of aIl for the laughs. Thank you very much to my supervisor, James SaveIle, for generously inviting me to participate in this project, and for his invaluable advice and patience. Thanks also to the other committee members: George Wenzel, for the knowledge and beer dispensed at the Talk Norths, and Michael Bisson for his helpful advice. Finally, last but definitely not least, thank you very much to Max Friesen for fostering my initial interest in Arctic Archaeology, and permitting me access to the collections of the University of Toronto's Howard Savage Faunal Archaeo-Osteology Laboratory. 111 Dedication: This is for my grandmothers - Frieda and Margaret. iv Table of Contents Abstract. ............................................................................................... ii Acknow ledgements ................................................................................. .iii Dedication ............................................................................................ .iv Table of Contents ..................................................................................... v List of Tables ........................................................................................vii List of Figures ....................................................................................... viii Chapter 1: Introduction .............................................................................. 1 Chapter 2: A Historical Review of Studies on Formation Processes ........................... 5 Early treatments of formation processes ......................................... 5 Behavioural archaeology ...........................................................7 Middle-range theory ............................................................... 11 Soil disturbance processes ........................................................ 14 Formation processes in Arctic contexts ......................................... 16 Chapter 3: Approaches to Taphonomic Analysis ................................................ 24 A historical review of taphonomic studies ..................................... 24 Food utility indices ................................................................ 30 Bone density indices ............................................................... 33 Chapter 4: Neoeskimos in Labrador-Ungava ................................................... .35 Geography .......................................................................... 35 Nunavik prehistory ................................................................ 36 Early description of Labrador-Ungava Inuit. .................................. 39 Archaeological investigations .................................................. .43 West coast Hudson Bay ................................................. .43 Hudson Strait ..............................................................44 West coast Ungava Bay ................................................. .49 Ungava interior. ...........................................................49 East coast Ungava Bay ...................................................50 Labrador ................................................................... 50 Ethnographic information ........................................................ 51 Labrador-Ungava ......................................................... 51 Tuvaaluk ...................................................................54 Chapter