DOCSLIB.ORG

Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera): Catalogue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera): Catalogue Larivière, M.-C.; Larochelle, A. 2004: Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera): catalogue. Fauna of New Zealand 50, 330 pp. INVERTEBRATE SYSTEMATICS ADVISORY GROUP REPRESENTATIVES OF L ANDCARE R ESEARCH Dr D. Choquenot Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Dr T.K. Crosby and Dr M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF UNIVERSITIES Dr R.M. Emberson Ecology and Entomology Group Soil, Plant, and Ecological Sciences Division P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF M USEUMS Mr R.L. Palma Natural Environment Department Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF OVERSEAS I NSTITUTIONS Dr M. J. Fletcher Director of the Collections NSW Agricultural Scientific Collections Unit Forest Road, Orange NSW 2800, Australia * * * SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 50 Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera) : catalogue M.-C. Larivière and A. Larochelle with colour photographs by B. E. Rhode Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand [email protected] [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a P R E S S Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2004 4 Larivière & Larochelle (2004): Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera): catalogue Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2004 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication LARIVIÈRE, MARIE-CLAUDE Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera): catalogue / M.-C. Larivière & A. Larochelle, with colour photographs by B. E. Rhode – Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2004. (Fauna of New Zealand, ISSN 0111–5383 ; no. 50). ISBN 0-478-09358-6 I. Larochelle, André, 1940 Apr. 10– II. Title III. Series UDC 595.754 Suggested citation: Larivière, M.-C.; Larochelle, A. 2004. Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera): catalogue. Fauna of New Zealand 50, 330 pp. Prepared for publication by the series editor and the authors using computer-based text processing, layout, and printing at Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand. Colour photographs prepared by Dr B. E. Rhode using a 3-CCD colour video camera, the software Auto- Montage® to increase depth-of-field, and the photoprocessing software PhotoShop® M~ori text by H. Jacob, Levin. Published by Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, P.O. Box 40, Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. Website: http://www.mwpress.co.nz/ Printed by PrintLink Ltd, Wellington Front cover: Tretocoris grandis Usinger & Matsuda, 1959 (Aradidae) (Illustrator: D. W. Helmore). Publication of the Fauna of New Zealand series is the result of a research investment by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology under contract number C09X0202. Fauna of New Zealand 50 5 POPULAR SUMMARY HE WHAKARAPOPOTOTANGA Class Insecta Order Hemiptera Suborder Heteroptera True bugs (Heteroptera) Heteroptera, or true bugs, are generally regarded as a suborder of the Hemiptera. There may be around 37 000 described species worldwide, and possibly another 25 000 species re- maining to be described. The world fauna is divided into roughly 75 families. The number of species of better known conti- nental faunas such as North America, Europe, or Australia, may be around 2 000 or 5 000 species. Compared with these Illustration / Whakaahua: Nothochromus maoricus larger regions the New Zealand fauna – currently comprising Slater, Woodward & Sweet, 1962 (Artheneidae) (Illustra- 29 families, 136 genera, and 305 species – may appear rela- tively small, but what it lacks in size it makes up in unique- tor / Kaiwhakaahua: D. W. Helmore). ness, e.g., 82% of known species do not occur anywhere else in the world. From this point of view New Zealand can be E whakaaetia wh~nuitia ana he pãtoi iti a Heteroptera (ng~ regarded as a biodiversity “hot spot” for true bugs. Once pepeke wahangote tãturu) nÇ ng~i Hemiptera. Kei te ~hua described, the New Zealand fauna will probably reach 400 to 37,000 pea ng~ momo kua whakaahuatia ~-kupu, huri i te ao, 500 species. Faunal affinities are greatest with southeastern me t‘ tahi atu 25,000 k~ore anÇ i whakaahuatia. Kua Australia. wehewehea ng~ momo ki ‘tahi wh~nau ~hua 75 nei. Ko te The question of what is a true bug is not necessarily easy maha o ng~ momo i ng~ k~hui e kaha ake ana te mÇhiotia, to answer since there may not be one unique defining p‘r~ i Ç Amerika ki te Raki, i Ç âropi, i Ç Ahitereiria, ko tÇna character shared by all species. Nevertheless, it is probably 2 000–2 500 pea. He tokoiti tonu te k~hui Heteroptera ki possible to recognise most true bugs on the basis of three Aotearoa ina whakatairitea ki Ç ‘r~ whenua rahi, in~ r~, e 29 main characteristics: sucking mouthparts in the form of a noa ng~ wh~nau, 136 ng~ puninga, e 305 ng~ momo, engari segmented beak extending from the front of the head and me kÇrero tÇna ahurei ka tika. Hei tauira, ko t‘tahi 82% o running backward along its underside; slightly overlapping ng~ momo o konei e mÇhiotia ana, k~ore e kitea i whenua k‘. forewings lying almost flat over the abdomen; and each Me k§p‘nei ake, he ~huru mÇwai tonu a Aotearoa mÇ ng~ forewing base being much thicker than the tip (hence the pepeke wahangote. Ina oti katoa ng~ mea o Aotearoa te name Heteroptera, derived from the Greek words heteros whakaahua ~-kupu, t‘r~ te eke ki te 400–500 momo. Ko Çna (different or other) and pteron (wing), referring to the k~wai torokaha, ki ng~ momo i te tonga-m~ -r~whiti o nonuniform texture of the forewings). Ahitereiria. While it is relatively easy to recognise a true bug, it may He uaua te whakautu i te p~tai he aha koia t‘nei mea te be more difficult to identify it at the species level. Heteroptera pepeke wahangote tãturu, i te mea karekau pea he ~huatanga often show a high degree of morphological similarity within motuhake kotahi e kitea ana i ng~ momo katoa. Heoi anÇ, e genera, high taxonomic diversity overall, and striking toru ng~ ~huatanga tinana matua e mÇhiotia ai te nuinga o ecological preferences. ng~ pepeke wahangote: he whai w~hanga ngote te waha, ar~, The Heteroptera are the largest and most diverse group he ngutu w~hanga-maha ka rere mai i mua o te ãpoko ki raro of insects with incomplete metamorphosis. As such, their life r~ anÇ; ko ng~ parirau o mua ka ~hua §nakinaki, me te tatao cycle involves an egg stage, a series of nymphs (usually 5) or anÇ ki te puku; he m~totoru noa ake te pãtake o te parirau o growing stages that look progressively similar to the adult, mua, t‘n~ i te pito (nÇ reira mai hoki te ingoa Heteroptera, i and finally an adult stage. ahu mai i ng~ kupu Kariki heteros (ar~, he rerek‘) me te True bugs are a highly adaptable group that has managed pteron (parirau), e tohu ana i te rerek‘ o te m~totoru i t‘n~ to occupy most terrestrial as well as many aquatic and semi- w~hi, i t‘n~ w~hi o te parirau o mua). aquatic habitats and to adopt remarkably diverse life habits Ahakoa m~m~ pea te whakatau ~e, he pepeke wahangote on nearly all continents and most islands, suggesting a long t‘r~, k~ore r~nei, ka uaua ake te ~ta wehewehe i ng~ momo, evolutionary history for the group. t‘tahi i t‘tahi. He kaha tonu te rite o te hanga i roto i ia As a result, Heteroptera are well represented in New puninga, engari ina tiro wh~nui ki ng~ puninga katoa, he Zealand entomological museums and collections. Despite this, matahuhua tonu te hanga, ~, he tino rerek‘ ng~ ~huatanga no up-to-date catalogue has been published following Wise’s taupuhi kaiao e pai ana ki t‘n~, ki t‘n~. (continued overleaf) (haere tonu) 6 Larivière & Larochelle (2004): Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera): catalogue (1977) “... synonymic checklist of the Hexapoda of the New O ng~ pepeke k~huarau pahara, ko ng~i Heteroptera te Zealand sub-region...”, which enumerated 100 genera and huinga pepeke nui katoa, matahuhua katoa. Mai i te 170 species. Numerous name changes and new genera and wh~nautanga ki te matenga, kotahi te tã~tipu hua, he maha species (over 160) have been published since then, and ng~ tã~tipu punua (e 5 Ç te nuinga), ng~ tã~tipu r~nei ka rite although the above checklist is still useful, it no longer reflects haere ki tÇ te pakeke te ~hua, ~, ko te k~hua whakamutunga, current knowledge of the fauna. Hence the reason for writing ko te pakeke tonu. this new catalogue, which aims to answer the questions He k~hui kaha te urutau ng~ pepeke wahangote. Kua commonly asked about any group of insects: What, where, tomo atu r~tou i te nuinga o ng~ ripoinga whenua, me te maha when, and how? What Heteroptera occur in New Zealand? atu o ng~ ripoinga wai, kua tino matahuhua anÇ ~ r~tou What is their status (e.g., native, introduced from elsewhere, kawenga e ora ai r~tou i te tini o ng~ whenua rahi me ng~ pests, beneficial predators)? What are the resources available moutere, e tohu ana kua aua atu pea te w~ e kukune haere ana to identify and study them? Where do species and genera ng~ pepeke wahangote nei ki te mata o te whenua.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Primer Registro Para El Neotrópico De La Familia Artheneidae Stål, 1872
    www.biotaxa.org/rce. ISSN 0718-8994 (online) Revista Chilena de Entomología (2021) 47 (2): 311-318. Nota Científica Primer registro para el Neotrópico de la familia Artheneidae Stål, 1872 (Heteroptera: Lygaeoidea), con la especie Holcocranum saturejae (Kolenati, 1845) introducida en Argentina First record for the Neotropics of the family Artheneidae Stål, 1872 (Heteroptera: Lygaeoidea), with the species Holcocranum saturejae (Kolenati, 1845) introduced in Argentina Diego L. Carpintero1, Alberto A. de Magistris2 y Eduardo I. Faúndez3* 1División Entomología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”. Av. Ángel Gallardo 470 (C1405DJR), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected]. 2Cátedras de Botánica Sistemática, y Ecología y Fitogeografía, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora, Ruta Provincial 4, Km 2 (1832), Llavallol, Partido de Lomas de Zamora, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected]. 3Laboratorio de entomología y salud pública, Instituto de la Patagonia, Universidad de Magallanes, Av. Bulnes 01855, Casilla 113-D, Punta Arenas, Chile. *[email protected] ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2C786219-0AE9-40A2-A175-E3C8750290A https://doi.org/10.35249/rche.47.2.21.17 Resumen. Se cita por primera vez para la Argentina a la especie Holcocranum saturejae (Kolenati) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Artheneidae), que se alimenta principalmente de totoras (Typha spp., Typhaceae) y, en menor medida de otras plantas, en base a una muestra proveniente de la Reserva Natural Provincial Santa Catalina en Lomas de Zamora, provincia de Buenos Aires. Se muestran imágenes de ejemplares recolectados y se dan sus caracteres diagnósticos. Se comenta brevemente la importancia de la aparición de esta especie en la Región Neotropical.
    [Show full text]
  • Insetos Do Brasil
    COSTA LIMA INSETOS DO BRASIL 2.º TOMO HEMÍPTEROS ESCOLA NACIONAL DE AGRONOMIA SÉRIE DIDÁTICA N.º 3 - 1940 INSETOS DO BRASIL 2.º TOMO HEMÍPTEROS A. DA COSTA LIMA Professor Catedrático de Entomologia Agrícola da Escola Nacional de Agronomia Ex-Chefe de Laboratório do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz INSETOS DO BRASIL 2.º TOMO CAPÍTULO XXII HEMÍPTEROS ESCOLA NACIONAL DE AGRONOMIA SÉRIE DIDÁTICA N.º 3 - 1940 CONTEUDO CAPÍTULO XXII PÁGINA Ordem HEMÍPTERA ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Superfamília SCUTELLEROIDEA ............................................................................................................ 42 Superfamília COREOIDEA ............................................................................................................................... 79 Super família LYGAEOIDEA ................................................................................................................................. 97 Superfamília THAUMASTOTHERIOIDEA ............................................................................................... 124 Superfamília ARADOIDEA ................................................................................................................................... 125 Superfamília TINGITOIDEA .................................................................................................................................... 132 Superfamília REDUVIOIDEA ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INSECTS of MICRONESIA Heteroptera: Pentatomoidea1
    INSECTS OF MICRONESIA Heteroptera: Pentatomoidea1 By HERBERT RUCKES RESEARCH ASSOCIATE, DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, NEW YORK EMERlTUS PROFESSOR OF BIOLOGY, CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK INTRODUCTION The Pentatomoidea consists of the families Plataspidae, Cydnidae, Pentatomidae, Acanthosomidae, Phloeidae, Urostylidae, Aphylidae, and Lestoniidae. In this classification I am following the terminology proposed by China and Miller (l955, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. XII, 8: 257-267). Of these various families, representatives of the Phloeidae, Urostylidae, Lestoniidae, and Aphylidae have not, as yet, been recorded from Micronesia. The Phloei­ dae, represented by two genera, are found only in Brazil. The Urostylidae, however, are native to India; China, Japan, Australia, the Philippines, and intermediate islands such as Borneo and Java. It is rather surprising that examples of this family have not been taken from Micronesia since the other pentatomoid fauna of these islands is, for the most part, derived from the nearby Australian, Asian, and adjacent insular regions where the Uro­ stylidae occur. Aphylidae and Lestoniidae are strictly Australian families, each represented by a single genus. The remaining families have varying representation in the Micronesian fauna. I wish to take this opportunity to express my sincere thanks to Miss Marjorie Statham, of the technical staff of the Department of Entomology of the American Museum of Natural History, for generously donating her time and ability to make the fine drawings that accompany this report. Her gratuitous services are, indeed, greatly appreciated. Thanks are also extended to Miss Setsuko Nakata, of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum staff, for editing and preparing the typescript of this article for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • And Phylogenetic Implications
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article The Complete Mitogenome of Pyrrhocoris tibialis (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae) and Phylogenetic Implications Qi-Lin Zhang 1,2 , Run-Qiu Feng 1, Min Li 1, Zhong-Long Guo 1 , Li-Jun Zhang 1, Fang-Zhen Luo 1, Ya Cao 1 and Ming-Long Yuan 1,* 1 State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems; Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education; College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; [email protected] (Q.-L.Z.); [email protected] (R.-Q.F.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (Z.-L.G.); [email protected] (L.-J.Z.); [email protected] (F.-Z.L.); [email protected] (Y.C.) 2 Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 August 2019; Accepted: 15 October 2019; Published: 18 October 2019 Abstract: We determined the complete mitogenome of Pyrrhocoris tibialis (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pyrrhocoridae) to better understand the diversity and phylogeny within Pentatomomorpha, which is the second largest infra-order of Heteroptera. Gene content, gene arrangement, nucleotide composition, codon usage, ribosomal RNA (rRNA) structures, and sequences of the mitochondrial transcription termination factor were well conserved in Pyrrhocoroidea. Different protein-coding genes have been subject to different evolutionary rates correlated with the G + C content. The size of control regions (CRs) was highly variable among mitogenomes of three sequenced Pyrrhocoroidea species, with the P.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance Of
    HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance of Arthropods in Residential Turfgrass 1 S. V. JOSEPH AND S. K. BRAMAN Department of Entomology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, GrifÞn, GA 30223-1797 J. Econ. Entomol. 102(3): 1116Ð1122 (2009) ABSTRACT The effect of taxa [common Bermuda grass, Cynodon dactylon (L.); centipedegrass, Eremochloa ophiuroides Munro Hack; St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum [Walt.] Kuntze; and zoysiagrass, Zoysia spp.], density, height, and weed density on abundance of natural enemies, and their potential prey were evaluated in residential turf. Total predatory Heteroptera were most abundant in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass and included Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae, Geocoridae, and Miridae. Anthocoridae and Lasiochilidae were most common in St. Augustinegrass, and their abundance correlated positively with species of Blissidae and Delphacidae. Chinch bugs were present in all turf taxa, but were 23Ð47 times more abundant in St. Augustinegrass. Anthocorids/lasiochilids were more numerous on taller grasses, as were Blissidae, Delphacidae, Cicadellidae, and Cercopidae. Geocoridae and Miridae were most common in zoysiagrass and were collected in higher numbers with increasing weed density. However, no predatory Heteroptera were affected by grass density. Other beneÞcial insects such as staphylinids and parasitic Hymenoptera were captured most often in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass. These differences in abundance could be in response to primary or alternate prey, or reßect the inßuence of turf microenvironmental characteristics. In this study, SimpsonÕs diversity index for predatory Heteroptera showed the greatest diversity and evenness in centipedegrass, whereas the herbivores and detritivores were most diverse in St. Augustinegrass lawns. These results demonstrate the complex role of plant taxa in structuring arthropod communities in turf.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Flat Bug Genera (Hemiptera, Aradidae)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Denisia Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 0019 Autor(en)/Author(s): Lariviere Marie C., Larochelle Andre Artikel/Article: An overview of flat bug genera (Hemiptera, Aradidae) from New Zealand, with considerations on faunal diversification and affinities 181-214 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at An overview of flat bug genera (Hemiptera, Aradidae) from New Zealand, with considerations on faunal diversification and affinities1 M .-C . L ARIVIÈRE & A. L AROCHELLE Abstract: Nineteen genera and thirty-nine species of Aradidae have been described from New Zealand, most of which are endemic (12 genera, 38 species). An overview of all genera and an identification key to subfamilies, tribes, and genera are presented for the first time. Species included in each genus are list- ed for New Zealand. Concise generic descriptions, illustrations emphasizing key diagnostic features, colour photographs representing each genus, an overview of the most relevant literature, and notes on distribution are also given. The biology and diversification of New Zealand aradids, and their affinities with neighbouring faunas are briefly discussed. Key words: Aradidae, biogeography, Hemiptera, New Zealand, taxonomy. Introduction forests, and using their stylets to extract liq- uids from fungal hyphae associated with de- The Aradidae, also commonly referred caying wood. Many ground-dwelling species to as flat bugs or bark bugs, form a large fam- of rainforest environments are wingless – a ily of Heteroptera containing over 1,800 condition thought to have evolved several species and 210 genera worldwide (SCHUH times in the phylogeographic history of the & SLATER 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Redactioneel
    REDACTIONEEL Henk Viscaal Alvorens dit redactioneeltje te beginnen wil ik alle leden van Succulenta het allerbeste voor 2006 toewensen. Naast het liefhebber zijn van cactussen en vetplanten, heeft zich bij mij in de loop der tijden een tweede hobby ontwikkeld: fotograferen. Daarom ben ik onlangs lid geworden van een fotoclub. Waar dat nu voor nodig was, werd mij ogenblikkelijk gevraagd. Je maakt toch al van die mooie foto’s. Dat klopt, maar op een gegeven moment krijg je het gevoel dat je op dood spoor zit en niet verder komt. Je bent niet langer tevreden met de resultaten, want je wilt meer. Nu is het grappige van een dergelijke club, dat er heel goed vergelijkingen gemaakt kunnen worden met een vereniging als de onze. Ook hier treffen we een aantal gelijkge- stemde mensen aan die hun hobby optimaal willen bedrijven. Ook hier zie je een willen presteren op een hoger niveau. Frappant hierbij is dat men open en eerlijk praat over de eigen mogelijk- en onmogelijkheden en de wil om de grenzen, op fotografie-gebied, te verleggen. Als lotgenoot leg je dan vooral goed je oor te luisteren en probeert dat op te pikken wat voor jou van belang is om een gesteld doel te bereiken. Dat doel is natuurlijk nog mooiere foto’s te maken. Wanneer je aan alle technische eisen voldoet, zul je in de meeste gevallen een duide- lijke, maar soms steriele afbeelding krijgen. En hier zit hem nu de kneep: je wilt de foto wat extra’s mee geven. Je wilt er een bepaalde sfeer in brengen.
    [Show full text]
  • 昆虫類 Insects カメムシ目 異翅亜目 Heteroptera 槐 真史 1) Masashi Enju
    丹沢大山総合調査学術報告書 丹沢大山動植物目録 （2007） 昆虫類 Insects カメムシ目 異翅亜目 Heteroptera 槐 真史 1) Masashi Enju 要 約 本報告では， 半翅類のうち異翅亜目について扱う． なお， 本調査では， カスミカメムシ科， グンバイムシ科の標本が若干 得られているが未同定である． 本調査で得られた半翅類異翅亜目は ､10 科 37 種であった． ムラクモナガカメムシ， ミヤマツノカメムシが神奈川県から初め て記録されたことや，記録が少なかったクロバアカサシガメ，ツノアカツノカメムシが複数得られたことは成果だと言えよう． また， 文献の証拠標本を再検したところ， ニセヒメクモヘリカメムシを神奈川県初記録として記録した． 本調査で得られた資料は断片的な調査によるもので， 調査時点での丹沢山地の半翅類異翅亜目相を把握したものではな い． 文献によれば， 現在までに 28 科 249 種が知られており， このことから見てもかなりの種が漏れているものと思われる． 丹沢山地における異翅亜目は， 現時点で 28 科 252 種が得られている． 凡 例 山北町白石沢 （林 , 1997） . 1. 分類体系， 種の配列， 学名は， 林 ・ 尾﨑 (2004) に従った． 2. 文献は， 近似種との区別が困難である種の記録や地名のみの タイコウチ下目 Nepomorpha 記録など，本来であれば個々に検討し採否を行うべきと考えるが， コオイムシ科 Belostomatidae 今後の調査活動の参考とするため， 収集できた全ての文献を網 コオイムシ Appasus japonicus Vuillefroy 羅した． 厚木市七沢 （苅部 ・ 高桑 , 1994） ; 秦野市大倉 （苅部 ・ 高桑 , 1994; 環境庁 , 1979） . アメンボ下目 Gerromorpha オオコオイムシ Appasus major (Esaki) アメンボ科 Gerridae 厚木市七沢 （高桑ほか , 1993; 苅部 ・ 高桑 , 1994） ; 津久井町鳥 ウミアメンボ亜科 Halobatinae 屋 （苅部 ・ 高桑 , 1994） . シマアメンボ Metrocoris histrio (White) 松田町 （平塚市博物館 , 1999） ; 秦野市丹沢 （鈴木 , 1966） . タイコウチ科 Nepidae アメンボ亜科 Gerrinae タイコウチ Laccotrephes japonensis Scott オオアメンボ Aquarius elongatus (Uhler) 厚木市七沢 （高桑ほか , 1993） ; 津久井町東野 （竹中 , 1984） . 厚木市七沢 （高桑ほか , 1993; 高桑 ・ 苅部 , 1996; 林 , 1997） ; 津 ミズカマキリ Ranatra chinensis Mayr 久井町鳥屋 （相模原市教育委員会 , 1994） ; 秦野市丹沢 （鈴木 , 厚木市七沢 （高桑ほか , 1993） ; 津久井町東野 （竹中 , 1984） ; 1966） ; 清川村谷太郎 （相模原市立博物館 , 1997） ; 山北町皆瀬 山北町川西 （林 , 1997） . 川 （東京農業大学第一高校生物部昆虫班 , 1972） . アメンボ Aquarius paludum paludum (Fabricius) ミズムシ科 Corixidae 厚木市七沢 （高桑ほか , 1993） ; 津久井町鳥屋 （相模原市教 ミズムシ亜科 Corixinae 育委員会 , 1994） ; 東野 （竹中 , 1984） ;
    [Show full text]
  • Insects in Kansas Book: 2016 Revised Taxonomy
    Insects in Kansas Book: 2016 Revised Taxonomy TAXONOMIC CHANGES TO INSECT ORDERS 1. Order Collembola, Springtails, are no longer classified as insects (pg. 38‐39) but were elevated to Class status 2. Order Thysanura, Bristletails and Silverfish are now split into their own Orders and Thysanura no longer exists as an Order name. a. Bristletails=Order Microcoryphia (pg. 40‐41) b. Silverfish=Order Zygentoma (pg. 40‐41) 3. Order Phasmatodea, walkingsticks, are sometimes referred to as Phasmida (pg. 55) 4. Order Blattodea now includes both cockroaches and termites (Order Isoptera is now a suborder) (pg. 84‐85) 5. Order Pscoptera, barklice, are now called Psocodea(pg. 86) 6. Orders Mallophaga and Anoplura (pg. 87‐92) are now in Psocodea as suborders 7. Order Hemiptera now includes the Order Homoptera (Homoptera is now a suborder) (pg. 121‐ 418) 8. Order Neuroptera now includes lacewings, owlflies, and antlions but NOT dobsonflies (see #9) (pg. 153‐159) 9. Order Megaloptera now includes dobsonflies, alderflies, and fishflies (pg. 153‐159) TAXONOMIC CHANGES TO INSECT FAMILIES 1. Cave and camel crickets are now in the Family Rhapidophoridae not Gryllacrididae (pg. 73) 2. Ant crickets have been put into their own Family now called Myrmecophilidae (pg. 74‐75) 3. Red‐legged Earwigs are now in the Family Anisolabididae (pg. 78) 4. German and wood cockroaches are now in the Family Ectobiidae, F. Blattellidae is no longer valid (pg. 82‐83) 5. Family Liposcelidae is now called Liposcelididae (pg. 86) 6. Pubic lice are now in their own Family Phthiridae (pg. 92) 7. Family Pentatomidae no longer includes the Shield bugs or shield‐backed bugs (pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of the Heteroptera Or True Bugs of the Galapagos Islands
    Synopsis of the Heteroptera or True Bugs of the Galapagos Islands ' 4k. RICHARD C. JROESCHNE,RD SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 407 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteroptera: Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae)
    2018 ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 58(1): 207–226 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE doi: 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0018 ISSN 1804-6487 (online) – 0374-1036 (print) www.aemnp.eu RESEARCH PAPER Annotated catalogue of the fl ower bugs from India (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae) Chandish R. BALLAL1), Shahid Ali AKBAR2,*), Kazutaka YAMADA3), Aijaz Ahmad WACHKOO4) & Richa VARSHNEY1) 1) National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru, India; e-mail: [email protected] 2) Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture, Srinagar, 190007 India; e-mail: [email protected] 3) Tokushima Prefectural Museum, Bunka-no-Mori Park, Mukoterayama, Hachiman-cho, Tokushima, 770–8070 Japan; e-mail: [email protected] 4) Department of Zoology, Government Degree College, Shopian, Jammu and Kashmir, 192303 India; e-mail: [email protected] *) Corresponding author Accepted: Abstract. The present paper provides a checklist of the fl ower bug families Anthocoridae th 6 June 2018 and Lasiochilidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of India based on literature and newly collected Published online: specimens including eleven new records. The Indian fauna of fl ower bugs is represented by 73 5th July 2018 species belonging to 26 genera under eight tribes of two families. Generic transfers of Blap- tostethus pluto (Distant, 1910) comb. nov. (from Triphleps pluto Distant, 1910) and Dilasia indica (Muraleedharan, 1978) comb. nov. (from Lasiochilus indica Muraleedharan, 1978) are provided. A lectotype is designated for Blaptostethus pluto. Previous, as well as new, distribu-
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]