Initial Situation Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mdg-Summary.Pdf
HungerMapLIVE: Madagascar insight and key trends By the World Food Programme (WFP) | 27 August 2021 FOOD INSECURITY AT A GLANCE 5.5M 26.3M 1.1M Chronic hunger Population Acute hunger (undernourishment) (INSTAT Census 2018 with a IPC Phase 3+ 2.46% growth rate, 2020) (SOFI Report, 2021)1 (IPC, Apr 2021 - Sep 2021)2 The HungerMapLIVE tracks core indicators of acute hunger in near real-time. Acute hunger is measured by key indicators such as household food consumption, livelihood behaviors, child nutritional status, mortality, access to clean drinking water and other contextual factors. The HungerMapLIVE primarily tracks trends on household food consumption, consumption-based coping and livelihood changes to track multiple aspects of food insecurity. As these are outcome level 1 indicators in the Integrated Food Security Phase Classication (IPC) Framework, they can provide early indications of potential shifts in acute food insecurity. Insucient food consumption (HungerMapLIVE data)3 7.0M → 6.7M As of 29 May 2021 As of 27 August 2021 Crisis or above crisis level food-based coping strategies (HungerMapLIVE data)3 10.9M → 13.1M As of 29 May 2021 As of 27 August 2021 Methodology Note: The HungerMapLIVE includes data from two sources: (1) WFP’s continuous, near real-time monitoring systems, which remotely collect thousands of data daily through live calls conducted by call centres around the world; and (2) machine learning-based predictive models. Therefore, to note this dierentiation, this report indicates whether a region’s data is based on WFP’s near real-time monitoring systems (marked ‘ACTUAL’) or predictive models (marked ‘PREDICTED’). -
Rano HP Et Ranon'ala
EVALUATION OF THE USAID/MADAGASCAR WATER SUPPLY, SANITATION AND HYGIENE BILATERAL PROJECTS: RANO HP ET RANON’ALA September 2014 This publication was produced at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared independently by CAETIC Développement ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge Jean-Claude RANDRIANARISOA, COR, for his constant guidance during this whole assignment. Discussions and exchanges we had with him were always fruitful and encouraging and of a high technical level. This document could not have reached this level of quality without the invaluable inputs from Jacky Ralaiarivony and from USAID Madagascar Program Office staff, namely Vololontsoa Raharimalala. The authors: Balsama ANDRIANTSEHENO Jean Marie RAKOTOVAO Ramy RAZAFINDRALAMBO Jean Herivelo RAKOTONDRAINIBE FINAL EVALUATION OF USAID/MADAGASCAR WSSH PROJECTS: EVALUATION OF THE USAID/MADAGASCAR WATER SUPPLY, SANITATION AND HYGIENE BILATERAL PROJECTS: RANO HP ET RANON’ALA SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 CONTRACT N° AID-687-C-13-00004 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................... -
Cyclone Enawo MADAGASCAR
Madagascar: Cyclone Enawo Situation Report No. 2 12 March 2017 This report is issued by the Bureau National de Gestion des Risques et des Catastrophes (BNGRC) and the Humanitarian Country Team in Madagascar. It covers the period from 9 to 12 March. The next report will be issued on or around 14 March 2017. Highlights • The remnants of Intense Tropical Cyclone Enawo exited Madagascar on the morning of Friday 10 March 2017. The storm traversed nearly the length of the island over two days, affecting communities from north to south across Madagascar’s eastern and central regions. • Wind damage and widespread flooding in cyclone- affected parts of the north-east, and heavy rains and widespread flooding in eastern, central and south- eastern parts of the country has been recorded. • Favourable weather conditions since 10 March have permitted national authorities and humanitarian partners to initiate rapid assessments in north- eastern, eastern and south-eastern parts of the country. • Initial humanitarian impacts in the areas of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), Shelter, Health, Food Security, Protection and Education, as well as Logistics have been identified. • Field coordination hubs are being jointly reinforced by national authorities and humanitarian partners in Maroantsetra and Antalaha. 295,950 84,660 83,100 58 Affected people Displaced people Damaged houses Affected districts Source: Bureau National de Gestion des Risques et des Catastrophes (BNGRC) de Madagascar, 12 March 2017 Situation Overview Intense Tropical Cyclone Enawo made landfall in north-eastern Madagascar’s Sava region on 7 March and then moved southward in an arc across central and south-eastern parts of the country as a tropical depression before exiting the country on the morning of 10 March. -
Social Finance Working Paper #37: the Role of a Professional
International Labour Organization Social Finance Programme Working Paper 37 The Role of a Professional Association in Mutual Microfinance: The Case of Madagascar Maria Sabrina De Gobbi Geneva, September 2003 Acknowledgements I wish to thank Ms. Ramona Olvera for her valuable support in editing this paper and adding relevant information. I also wish to thank Monah Andriambalo, the secretary-general of APIFM, and Paula Rabefiringa, the technical assistant of A.P.I.F.M., for information and comments on the paper. Though the staff at A.P.I.F.M. provided material for this paper, the views expressed only represent those of the author. 2 Table of Contents List of Acronyms.......................................................................................................................6 Executive summary ..................................................................................................................8 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................10 1.1. Objective and Purpose................................................................................................10 1.2. Background.................................................................................................................11 2. Microfinance in Madagascar.............................................................................................13 2.1. Beginning Microfinance in Madagascar...................................................................13 2.2. -
Madagascar Insight and Key Trends by the World Food Programme (WFP) | 26 August 2021
HungerMapLIVE: Madagascar insight and key trends By the World Food Programme (WFP) | 26 August 2021 FOOD INSECURITY AT A GLANCE 5.5M 26.3M 1.1M Chronic hunger Population Acute hunger (undernourishment) (INSTAT Census 2018 with a IPC Phase 3+ 2.46% growth rate, 2020) (SOFI Report, 2021)1 (IPC, Apr 2021 - Sep 2021)2 The HungerMapLIVE tracks core indicators of acute hunger in near real-time. Acute hunger is measured by key indicators such as household food consumption, livelihood behaviors, child nutritional status, mortality, access to clean drinking water and other contextual factors. The HungerMapLIVE primarily tracks trends on household food consumption, consumption-based coping and livelihood changes to track multiple aspects of food insecurity. As these are outcome level 1 indicators in the Integrated Food Security Phase Classication (IPC) Framework, they can provide early indications of potential shifts in acute food insecurity. Insucient food consumption (HungerMapLIVE data)3 7.0M → 6.7M As of 28 May 2021 As of 26 August 2021 Crisis or above crisis level food-based coping strategies (HungerMapLIVE data)3 10.9M → 13.0M As of 28 May 2021 As of 26 August 2021 Methodology Note: The HungerMapLIVE includes data from two sources: (1) WFP’s continuous, near real-time monitoring systems, which remotely collect thousands of data daily through live calls conducted by call centres around the world; and (2) machine learning-based predictive models. Therefore, to note this dierentiation, this report indicates whether a region’s data is based on WFP’s near real-time monitoring systems (marked ‘ACTUAL’) or predictive models (marked ‘PREDICTED’). -
Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian
ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra, -
Madagascar Country Office Covid-19 Response
COVID-19 Situation Report, Madagascar | July 29th, 2020 Madagascar Country Office Covid-19 response July 29th 2020 Situation in Numbers 10432 cases across 19 regions 93 deaths 101 RECOVERED July 29th 2020 Highlights Funding status th th From May 17 to July 29 2020, the positive COVID-19 cases growth curve fund decupled exponentially from 304 to 10,432 cases with 0.89% of fatality rate received in 19 out of 22 affected regions (all except Androy, Atsimo Atsinanana and $1.19 Melaky). funding gap The epicenter remains the capital Antananarivo with very high community $3.45 transmission. The hospitalization capacity was reached in central hospitals which led to care decentralization for asymptomatic and pauci- symptomatic patients whilst hospitalization is offered in priority for carry forward moderate, severe and critical patients. $2.35 UNICEF supports moderate, severe and critical patients’ care by supplying oxygen (O2) to central hospitals, helping saving lives of most severe patients. Thus far, 240,000 families have received a cash transfer of 100,000 Ariary (26 USD) to meet their basic needs. In collaboration with the Government and through the Cash Working Group, UNICEF coordinates the second wave of emergency social assistance in the most affected urban and peri- urban areas. However, UNICEF’s appeal for emergency social protection support, remains unfunded. Around 300,000 children received self-study booklets while distribution to another 300,000 children is being organized. UNICEF is monitoring the promoted health measures to be put in place prior the tentative examination dates for grade, 7, 3 and Terminal. Funding 600,000 Overview people in most affected cities benefitted from a subsidized access to water, via Avo-Traina programme while more than 20,000 taxi were disinfected and supported with hydroalcoholic gel and masks in Antananarivo. -
The Madagascar Rosewood Massacre
MADAGASCAR CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT VOLUME 4 | ISSUE 2 — DECEMBER 2009 PAGE 98 The Madagascar rosewood massacre Derek Schuurman and Porter P. Lowry III Correspondence: Derek Schuurman E - mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT centaines de tonnes par mois en 1998 à plus de 30,000 tonnes Valuable timber has been exploited from Madagascar’s entre juillet 2000 et juin 2001. Ces bois précieux ont presque rainforests for many decades, and Malagasy rosewood and tous été obtenus d’une exploitation illicite en provenant des palissandre (Dalbergia spp.) are among the most sought after aires protégées et plus particulièrement des Parcs Nationaux hardwoods in the world. Large quantities have been harvested de Marojejy et de Masoala dans la région SAVA (Sambava - and exported at an increasing rate over the last decade, almost Antalaha - Vohémar - Andapa) au nord - est de Madagascar. entirely from illegal logging in protected areas, in particular Ces parcs ont été récemment reconnus au titre de patrimoine Masoala and Marojejy National Parks, which comprise part of mondial de l’UNESCO dans la nouvelle région des forêts the newly - established Atsinanana UNESCO World Heritage Site humides de l’Atsinanana. Nous présentons des informa- in the SAVA (Sambava - Antalaha - Vohémar - Andapa) region tions obtenues de sources régionales qui montrent qu’une of northeast Madagascar. We present information obtained from organisation d’un trafic sans précédent de l’exploitation illégale sources in the region that documents an unprecedented, highly dans les -
Tana Lsms Hh
This PDF generated by katharinakeck, 1/24/2017 10:08:32 AM Sections: 10, Sub-sections: 38, Questionnaire created by opm, 8/4/2016 10:22:56 AM Questions: 366. Last modified by katharinakeck, 1/24/2017 3:00:47 PM Questions with enabling conditions: 206 Questions with validation conditions: 30 Shared with: Rosters: 18 opm (last edited 10/19/2016 10:14:02 AM) Variables: 34 aarau (last edited 10/25/2016 9:18:23 AM) seanoleary (last edited 10/17/2016 4:20:41 PM) arinay (never edited) rharati (never edited) kirsten (never edited) andrianina (never edited) mmihary_r (never edited) sergiy (never edited) janaharb (last edited 10/21/2016 4:55:02 PM) opm (last edited 10/19/2016 10:14:02 AM) gabielte (never edited) TANA_LSMS_HH START Sub-sections: 4, No rosters, Questions: 23, Variables: 5. CONSENT FORM No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 1, Static texts: 2. ROSTER No sub-sections, Rosters: 1, Questions: 5, Static texts: 2, Variables: 2. RESPONDENT SELECTION No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 7, Variables: 3. MAIN RESPONDENT Sub-sections: 22, Rosters: 10, Questions: 236, Static texts: 4, Variables: 5. CONSUMPTION Sub-sections: 6, Rosters: 5, Questions: 18, Static texts: 4, Variables: 13. HOUSEHOLD HEAD Sub-sections: 2, Rosters: 1, Questions: 18, Static texts: 1, Variables: 3. LABOUR Sub-sections: 4, Rosters: 1, Questions: 42, Variables: 3. OBSERVATIONS No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 12. RESULT No sub-sections, No rosters, Questions: 4. APPENDIX A — INSTRUCTIONS APPENDIX B — OPTIONS APPENDIX C — VARIABLES LEGEND 1 / 65 START EA ID NUMERIC: INTEGER ea_id SCOPE: PREFILLED DWELLING ID NUMERIC: INTEGER dwllid SCOPE: PREFILLED TYPE DWELLING ID AGAIN NUMERIC: INTEGER dwllid2 V1 self==dwllid M1 Dwelling ID does not match V2 ea_id*100+1<=self && self <=ea_id*100+30 M2 Dwelling ID and EA ID do not match VARIABLE DOUBLE dwlnum dwllid-100*ea_id THIS IS A REPLACEMENT DWELLING. -
TDR Annexe7 Rapport Analyse 322 Communes OATF
ETAT DES LIEUX DES 319 COMMUNES POUR LE FINANCEMENT ADDITIONNEL DU PROJET CASEF Février 2019 TABLE DES MATIERES TABLE DES MATIERES .................................................................................................................... i LISTE DES ACRONYMES ................................................................................................................ iii Liste des tableaux ......................................................................................................................... v Listes des Cartes ........................................................................................................................... v Liste des figures ............................................................................................................................vi Liste des photos ...........................................................................................................................vi I INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 II METHODOLOGIES .................................................................................................................... 2 II.1 CHOIX DES 322 COMMUNES OBJETS D’ENQUETE ............................................................... 2 II.2 CHOIX DES CRITERES DE SELECTION DES COMMUNES ........................................................ 5 II.3 METHODOLOGIE DE COLLECTE DE DONNEES ET ACTIVITES ................................................. 6 -
Fill the Nutrient Gap Madagascar: Full Report
Fill the Nutrient Gap Madagascar: Full Report October 2016 Photo: WFP/Volana Rarivos World Food Programme Office National de Nutrition Fill the Nutrient Gap Madagascar Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 9 The Process in Madagascar ................................................................................................................... 10 Malnutrition Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 11 Nutrition-related policies, programmes and regulatory framework .................................................... 22 Availability of Nutritious Foods ............................................................................................................. 27 Access to Nutritious Foods.................................................................................................................... 32 Nutrient Intake ..................................................................................................................................... -
Building Bridges in Biosphere Reserves –
Building Bridges in Biosphere Reserves – The role of natural and social values in integrative conservation and development concepts in Madagascar Mananara-Nord and Sahamalaza Iles-Radama Biosphere Reserves I n a u g u r a l d i s s e r t a t i o n zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald vorgelegt von Nadine V. M. Fritz-Vietta geboren am 05.10.1979 in Darmstadt Greifswald, 23.12.2011 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Klaus Fesser 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Susanne Stoll-Kleemann 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Tim O‘Riordan Tag der Promotion: 22.05.2012 Valuing and knowing are not separate. How we know nature and how we value, or discount, nature are tightly linked. (Norgaard, 2009: 44) To my family Abstract Abstract The dissertation aims at developing means to integrate conservation and development in biosphere reserves in Madagascar. Despite a multitude of concepts such as UNESCO biosphere reserves, Integrated Conservation and Development Projects and community- based natural resource management, gaps between conservation and development remain to exist. In a qualitative case study in Mananara-Nord and Sahamalaza Biosphere Reserves in Madagascar data was collected on biosphere reserve management, local natural resource use, socio-cultural aspects and natural values local people associate with the forest. Analysis revealed that management capacities constitute a limiting factor in biosphere reserve management. Collaboration between management, local people and international organisations fosters the achievement of both conservation and development. However, collaboration only performs if a shared vision is established.