DOCSLIB.ORG

DS-05 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STANDARD Version 1.0 February 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DS-05 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STANDARD Version 1.0 February 2021 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STANDARD V1 NOVEMBER 2020 DS-05 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STANDARD Version 1.0 February 2021 THIS SECTION COVERS: • Project Life-Cycle Analysis • High Performance Buildings • Building Water Management • Storm Water Management • Ecology • Resilience • Sustainability Plan & Reporting 1 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STANDARD V1 NOVEMBER 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PREFACE .................................................................... 6 2.2.3 Guidance ................................................................. 19 1.1 PURPOSE ............................................................................... 6 2.2.4 Options .................................................................... 19 1.2 OBJECTIVE ........................................................................... 6 2.2.5 Reporting Direction ................................................ 19 1.3 SCOPE ................................................................................... 7 2.3 MATERIAL LIFE-CYCLE IMPACTS ....................................... 22 1.4 HOW TO USE THIS STANDARD .......................................... 7 2.3.1 Objectives ............................................................... 22 1.5 LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ........................ 8 2.3.2 Requirements .......................................................... 22 1.6 KEY CONCEPTS ................................................................... 8 2.3.3 Guidance ................................................................. 22 1.6.1 Sustainability ........................................................... 8 2.3.4 Options .................................................................... 22 1.6.2 Climate Adaptation ................................................ 9 3 HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDINGS ............................. 24 1.6.3 Climate Change Mitigation ................................... 9 3.1 BUILDING ENERGY AND CARBON PERFORMANCE TARGETS ............................................................................ 24 1.6.4 Carbon Balance ...................................................... 9 3.1.1 Objectives ............................................................... 24 1.7 REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS .............................................. 10 3.1.2 Requirements .......................................................... 24 2 PRE PROJECT LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS ........................ 14 3.1.3 Options .................................................................... 24 2.1 LIFE-CYCLE COST ................................................................ 14 3.2 ENERGY SIMULATIONS AND MODELING ........................ 25 2.1.1 Objectives ............................................................... 14 3.2.1 Objectives ............................................................... 25 2.1.2 Requirements .......................................................... 15 3.2.2 Requirements .......................................................... 25 2.1.3 Options .................................................................... 16 3.2.3 Guidance ................................................................. 26 2.1.4 Reporting Direction ................................................ 16 3.2.4 Options .................................................................... 27 2.2 LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT (EMBODIED CARBON) .......... 17 3.3 ENERGY EFFICIENT DESIGN .............................................. 27 2.2.1 Objectives ............................................................... 17 3.3.1 Objectives ............................................................... 27 2.2.2 Requirements .......................................................... 18 DESIGN STANDARDS 2 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STANDARD V1 NOVEMBER 2020 3.3.2 Building Envelope ................................................... 27 3.5.1 Objectives ............................................................... 41 3.3.2.1 Requirements........................................................ 27 3.5.2 Requirements .......................................................... 41 3.3.2.2 Guidance ............................................................... 28 3.5.3 Options .................................................................... 41 3.3.2.3 Options ................................................................. 30 4 BUILDING WATER MANAGEMENT ............................ 43 3.3.3 Mechanical Systems ............................................... 30 4.1 WATER MODELLING, METERING AND MONITORING ... 43 3.3.3.1 Guidance ............................................................... 30 4.1.1 Objectives ............................................................... 43 3.3.3.2 Options ................................................................. 31 4.1.2 Requirements .......................................................... 43 3.3.4 Electrical Systems ................................................... 34 4.1.3 Options .................................................................... 44 3.3.4.1 Requirements - Energy Automation & Controls 34 4.2 WATER EFFICIENT DESIGN................................................. 44 3.3.4.2 Requirements - Energy Metering & Monitoring 34 4.2.1. Objectives ............................................................... 44 3.3.4.3 Requirements – Lighting ...................................... 35 4.2.2 Requirements – Water Efficiency........................... 44 3.3.4.4 Requirements – General ...................................... 35 4.2.3 Requirements – Calculations ................................. 46 3.4 SOLAR PV RENEWABLE ENERGY ....................................... 36 4.2.4 Requirements – Cooling Tower ............................. 46 3.4.1 Objectives ............................................................... 36 4.2.5 Requirements – Reclaimed Water ......................... 46 3.4.2 Requirements - General ......................................... 36 4.2.6 Guidance ................................................................. 47 3.4.3 Requirements – Solar PV Module .......................... 37 4.2.7 Options .................................................................... 47 3.4.4 Requirements – Solar PV Inverter .......................... 38 5 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT ................................. 50 3.4.5 Requirements – Warranties .................................... 39 5.1 STORM WATER PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ...................... 50 3.4.6 Guidance ................................................................. 39 5.1.1 Objectives ............................................................... 50 3.4.7 Options .................................................................... 39 5.1.2 Requirements - General ......................................... 50 3.5 HEAT ISLAND MITIGATION ................................................ 41 5.1.3 Requirements – Water Quantity ............................ 51 3 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN STANDARD V1 NOVEMBER 2020 5.1.4 Guidance – Water Quantity .................................... 51 5.2.6.5 Design Direction .................................................. 64 5.1.5 Requirements – Water Balance .............................. 51 5.2.7 Bioretention Cells ................................................... 66 5.1.6 Guidance – Water Balance ..................................... 52 5.2.7.1 Requirements ........................................................ 66 5.1.7 Requirements – Water Quality ............................... 52 5.2.8 Infiltration Trench – Requirements ........................ 68 5.1.8 Requirements – Flood Mitigation .......................... 53 5.2.8.1 Requirements........................................................ 68 5.2 LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES ...................... 53 5.2.9 Bioswales ................................................................. 68 5.2.1 Objectives ............................................................... 53 5.2.9.1 Requirements ........................................................ 68 5.2.2 Requirements - General ......................................... 53 5.2.9.2 Options .................................................................. 69 5.2.3 Guidance - General................................................. 54 5.2.10 Storm Water Detention Roofs ................................ 70 5.2.4 Options - General ................................................... 54 5.2.10.1 Requirements ...................................................... 70 5.2.5 Green Roof .............................................................. 54 5.2.10.2 Design Direction ................................................ 70 5.2.5.1 Requirements ........................................................ 54 5.2.11 Cisterns and Rain Barrels - Requirements ............ 71 5.2.5.2 Guidance ............................................................... 55 5.2.12 Manufactured, Structural LIDs - Requirements ... 71 5.2.5.3 Options ................................................................. 55 6 ECOLOGY .................................................................. 72 5.2.5.4 Design Direction .................................................. 56 6.1 SOIL MANAGEMENT ........................................................... 72 5.2.6 Permeable Paving ................................................... 60 6.1.1 Objectives ............................................................... 72 5.2.6.1 Requirements - General ....................................... 63 6.1.2 Requirements .......................................................... 72 5.2.6.2 Requirements
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Entuitive Credentials
    CREDENTIALS SIMPLIFYING THE COMPLEX Entuitive | Credentials FIRM PROFILE TABLE OF CONTENTS Firm Profile i) The Practice 1 ii) Approach 3 iii) Better Design Through Technology 6 Services i) Structural Engineering 8 ii) Building Envelope 10 iii) Building Restoration 12 iv) Special Projects and Renovations 14 Sectors 16 i) Leadership Team 18 ii) Commercial 19 iii) Cultural 26 iv) Institutional 33 SERVICES v) Healthcare 40 vi) Residential 46 vii) Sports and Recreation 53 viii) Retail 59 ix) Hospitality 65 x) Mission Critical Facilities/Data Centres 70 xi) Transportation 76 SECTORS Image: The Bow*, Calgary, Canada FIRM PROFILE: THE PRACTICE ENTUITIVE IS A CONSULTING ENGINEERING PRACTICE WITH A VISION OF BRINGING TOGETHER ENGINEERING AND INTUITION TO ENHANCE BUILDING PERFORMANCE. We created Entuitive with an entrepreneurial spirit, a blank canvas and a new approach. Our mission was to build a consulting engineering firm that revolves around our clients’ needs. What do our clients need most? Innovative ideas. So we created a practice environment with a single overriding goal – realizing your vision through innovative performance solutions. 1 Firm Profile | Entuitive Image: Ripley’s Aquarium of Canada, Toronto, Canada BACKED BY DECADES OF EXPERIENCE AS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, WE’VE ACCOMPLISHED A GREAT DEAL TAKING DESIGN PERFORMANCE TO NEW HEIGHTS. FIRM PROFILE COMPANY FACTS The practice encompasses structural, building envelope, restoration, and special projects and renovations consulting, serving clients NUMBER OF YEARS IN BUSINESS throughout North America and internationally. 4 years. Backed by decades of experience as Consulting Engineers. We’re pushing the envelope on behalf of – and in collaboration with OFFICE LOCATIONS – our clients. They are architects, developers, building owners and CALGARY managers, and construction professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices in Data Visualization
    Best Practices in Data Visualization Jodie Jenkinson, Associate Professor + Director Biomedical Communications University of Toronto bmc.med.utoronto.ca Why visualize data? • Because of the inexplicability of complex information or raw data • In order to leverage visual perception • To create an aid to understanding • To provide insight Best Practices in Data Visualization – ComSciComCan Jenkinson Leveraging visual perception Vision is high bandwidth • 40%+ of cortex devoted to visual perception • Information processing capacity of the visual system • High-bandwidth channel • 109 bits per second* • Parallel processing • = 1 billion bits • = ~120 Megabytes per second * Information Capacity of a Single Retinal Channel, DH Kelly, IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 1962, pp. 221 Best Practices in Data Visualization – ComSciComCan Jenkinson Best Practices in Data Visualization – ComSciComCan Jenkinson All visual stimuli Pre-attentive Pre-attentive Attend to Leveraging visual perception Vision is high bandwidth • 40%+ of cortex devoted to visual perception • Information processing capacity of the visual system • High-bandwidth channel • 109 bits per second* • Parallel processing • = 1 billion bits • = ~120 Megabytes per second * Information Capacity of a Single Retinal Channel, DH Kelly, IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 1962, pp. 221 Best Practices in Data Visualization – ComSciComCan Jenkinson Best Practices in Data Visualization – ComSciComCan Jenkinson All visual stimuli Pre-attentive Pre-attentive Attend to Providing insight
    [Show full text]
  • Peel Salt Management Facility – Design Build FEATURE PROJECT
    TEAMKENAIDAN REGISTERED ISO 9001 ISO 14001 ISO 45001 Peel Salt Management Facility – Design Build FEATURE PROJECT Corporate Donations Project Requirements Kenaidan recently made donations to: The Region of Peel uses salt and brine (liquid to support a pre-engineered building. The 13 m Following a phased design and permitting • Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of Canada salt) for their winter maintenance operations to high salt building has a capacity to store 13,000 process that began in January 2020, construction improve winter driving and walking conditions. tonnes of salt. The brine building and truck-rinse began in Spring 2020. The main salt storage These seasonal services are supported by building is a conventional steel frame clad with building is complete and ready for use, while several facilities located throughout the Region. precast concrete panels. remaining work is anticipated to be completed To increase capacity, the Salt Management by April 2021. The existing facility has remained Facility (SMF), located at 2 Copper Road in the Kenaidan is self-performing the concrete fully operational throughout the duration of City of Brampton, is being expanded. formwork and various mechanical installations, the contract. including: The new SMF has a gross area of approximately • 3,029 m3 of concrete with a large component 2 Roles & Responsibilities 2,300 m with three interconnected buildings set being chloride resistant aside for salt storage, brine production, and an 2 automated truck rinse. To create space for the • 4,220 m of formwork that includes 10 m high Owner: The Regional Municipality of Peel concrete bunker walls for the salt storage area Design Build Lead Consultant: Garry Cunningham Chris Kodama Marisa Nardini Andrea Howson Julie Dorie Elia Rizkalla new development, work included demolition of the existing salt dome foundations, the original brine • Three 100,000 litre underground Fiberglass R.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Shantz Aaron.Pdf (7.260Mb)
    Understanding Factors Associated With Commuter Rail Ridership A Demand Elasticity Study of the GO Transit Rail Network by Aaron Shantz A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies in Planning Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2021 © Aaron Shantz 2021 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that this thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Mode share in major North American cities is currently dominated by private automobile use. Planners have theorized that transitioning commuter rail systems to regional rail networks is a viable method to increase ridership and stabilize mode share. This process is currently underway in Ontario, Canada, as the amount and frequency of service is being increased throughout the GO Transit rail network via the GO Expansion Program. However, previous studies have shown that transit demand does not solely respond to service quantity expansions. Variables related to the built environment, regional economy, network characteristics, and socioeconomic status of the customer base can influence transit demand to varying degrees. Further, the literature states that the travel behavior of commuter rail users is unique, as access mode, distance, socioeconomic status, and the utility derived from varying trip types can differ compared to local transit users. These findings suggest that supplementary policies might be needed to reduce automobile reliance and stimulate demand for regional transit. Many transit researchers have conducted demand elasticity studies to identify what factors are significantly associated with transit ridership.
    [Show full text]
  • November 17, 2016 Reference No. 2821569 (13268)
    November 17, 2016 Reference No. 2821569 (13268) Mr. Glenn Harrington Harrington McAvan Ltd. Landscape Architects 6882 14th Avenue Markham, Ontario L6B 1A8 Dear Mr. Harrington: Re: Spencer Pit Application Review of OPA 81 Policies GHD has reviewed the relevant sections of OPA 81 as they relate to the Tri City Spencer Pit proposal and can confirm that our Traffic Impact Study is in conformity with the OPA 81 policies and there are no proposed changes in OPA 81 that impact the analysis and technical recommendations contained within our report. Sincerely, GHD William Maria, P. Eng. Senior Project Manager WM/db/1 GHD 6705 Millcreek Drive Unit 1 Mississauga Ontario L5N 5M4 Canada T 416 213 7121 F 905 890 8499 W www.ghd.com Tri City Lands Ltd. Traffic Impact Assessment Proposed Spencer Pit - Town of Guelph/Eramosa April 2014 Executive summary x The proposed Spencer Pit license proposes an annual maximum material extraction of 650,000 tonnes. This translates into an hourly truck traffic generation of up to 6 inbound and 9 outbound trucks during the am peak hour and 9 inbound and 6 outbound trips during the pm peak hour during peak summertime operations. x Vehicular access for the new pit will be directly to Wellington Road 124 opposite Kossuth Road at its intersection with Wellington Road 124. The site access driveway will create a new four-legged intersection at this location. x The primary haul route will be east and west respectively along Wellington Road 124 and Hespeler Road (Waterloo Regional Road 24), as well as west on Kossuth Road (Waterloo Regional Road 31).
    [Show full text]
  • Mississauga Cycling Advisory Committee
    Mississauga Cycling Advisory Committee Date: September 15, 2020 Time: 6:30 PM Location: Online Video Conference Members Councillor Chris Fonseca Ward 3 (Chair) Anna Tran Citizen Member Earl Close Citizen Member Kris Hammel Citizen Member Jeff Fleming Citizen Member Laiq Siddiqui Citizen Member Larry Lindsay Citizen Member Paulina Pedziwiatr Citizen Member Rosanna Chacko Citizen Member Sunil Sharma Citizen Member Suzanne Doyle Citizen Member (Vice-Chair) Any member of the public interested in speaking to an item listed on the agenda may register at [email protected] or call 905-615-3200 ext. 3795 by Monday, September 14, 2020 before 4:00P.M. Please note the Mississauga Cycling Advisory Committee will not be streamed or video posted afterwards. If you are interested in attending the meeting virtually, please contact [email protected] or call 905-615-3200 ext. 3795 by Monday, September 14, 2020 before 4:00P.M. in order to join the meeting. Contact Stephanie Smith, Legislative Coordinator, Legislative Services 905-615-3200 ext. 3795 Email [email protected] Find it Online http://www.mississauga.ca/portal/cityhall/cyclingadvisory Mississauga Cycling Advisory Committee 2020/09/15 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST 4. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING 4.1 Mississauga Cycling Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes - March 10, 2020 5. PRESENTATIONS 6. DEPUTATIONS 7. PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD - 15 Minute Limit Pursuant to Section 42 of the Council Procedure By-law 0139-2013, as amended: Mississauga Cycling Advisory Committee may grant permission to a member of the public to ask a question of Mississauga Cycling Advisory Committee, with the following 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Miway Service Changes Effective September 1, 2014: Date Posted: August 15, 2014. 3 Bloor Weekday a New Westbound Trip Will Depar
    MiWay Service Changes Effective September 1, 2014: Date Posted: August 15, 2014. 3 Bloor Weekday A new westbound trip will depart from Bloor Street and Tomken Road (STOP #1351) at 2:48 pm. 6 Credit Woodlands Weekday Two new eastbound trips will depart from Woodlands Secondary School (STOP #1118) at 2:56 pm and 3:02 pm. 8 Cawthra Weekday The 2:51 pm northbound trip from Port Credit GO Station (STOP #0348) will now depart at 2:55 pm. The 3:39 pm southbound trip from the City Centre Terminal (STOP #0597) will now depart at 3:41 pm. A new southbound trip will depart from the City Centre Transit Terminal (STOP #0597) at 7:53 am. 10 Bristol-Britannia Weekday A new northbound trip will depart from Bristol Road and Hurontario Street (STOP #3406) at 2:36 pm. 13 Glen Erin Weekday A new northbound trip will depart from Truscott Drive and Southdown Road (STOP #0245) at 2:20 pm. Two new northbound trips will depart from Eglinton Avenue and Glen Erin Drive (STOP #2508) at 2:30 pm and 2:35 pm. 14 Lorne Park Weekday The 4:17 pm, 4:49 pm, 5:27 pm and 6:02 pm eastbound trips from Clarkson GO Station (STOP #0297) will now depart at 4:19 pm, 4:55 pm, 5:29 pm and 6:07 pm. The 4:06 pm, 4:44 pm, 5:16 pm, 5:54 pm and 6:34 pm westbound trips from Port Credit GO Station (STOP #0314) will now depart at 4:12 pm, 4:46 pm, 5:21 pm, 5:56 pm and 6:44 pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase One Engagement Report
    Prepared by Lura Consulting in association Report Phase One Engagement with Steer Davies Gleave for: The City of Mississauga January 2018 Revised June 2018 This report was prepared by Lura Consulting, the independent facilitator and engagement specialist for the Mississauga Transportation Master Plan. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please contact: James Knott | Senior Project Manager Lura Consulting | lura.ca [email protected] | t: 905.481.2467 614 Concession Street, Hamilton ON L8V 1B5 i Mississauga Transportation Master Plan – Phase One Engagement Report Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Engagement Objectives ................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Overall Timing and Phasing of the Engagement Process .............................................................. 2 1.4 Overview of Phase One ................................................................................................................. 3 1.5 Report Contents ............................................................................................................................ 3 2 Phase One Engagement Process Overview ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project Synopsis
    URBAN LAND Township of Stone Mills Request for Proposals Proposal for Land Use Planning Services Submitted to Township of Stone Mills by IBI Group January 2016 IBI GROUP TOWNSHIP OF STONE MILLS PROPOSAL FOR LAND USE PLANNING SERVICES Submitted to Township of Stone Mills Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1 Project Understanding ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Township of Stone Mills – A Snapshot .................................................. 1 1.2 Project Objectives and Responsibilities ........................................................ 2 2 Qualifications of IBI Group ..................................................................................... 2 2.1 Firm Profile .................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Project Team and Experience ...................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Team Structure ................................................................................ 3 2.2.2 Project Team Experience ................................................................. 4 2.3 References .................................................................................................... 5 3 Description of Services and Fees .......................................................................... 6 3.1 Our Approach ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Move Baseline Monitoring Report
    The Big Move Baseline Monitoring Report September 2013 AN AGENCY OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO Prepared for Metrolinx by The Big Move Baseline Monitoring Report Executive Summary Introduction The Big Move is the Greater Toronto and Hamilton’s (GTHA’s) multi-modal long-range regional transportation plan. Since 2008, this plan has been providing strategic direction for planning, designing and building a regional transportation network that enhances our quality of life, our environment, and our prosperity. To support this 25-year plan, it is important to regularly take stock of collective efforts to fulfill The Big Move, and to monitor its implementation. On May 27th, 2013 Metrolinx released an Investment Strategy recommending revenue sources to continue to pay for the major aspects of The Big Move. During that consultation, the public indicated that public accountability is a priority, confirming the importance of one of The Big Move’s goals of fairness and transparency. Understanding how the region is doing, and setting a baseline to measure continuous improvement is an important aspect of understanding the region’s progress in an efficient, accountable and transparent way. The Big Move Baseline Monitoring Report establishes a foundation for monitoring progress, using a set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to measure achievement of The Big Move’s goals. Five years is a short time to complete the bold changes set out in The Big Move, but taking a regional scan and compiling the available data now helps, going forward, to define regional trends and catalogue individual initiatives that contribute to successfully achieving the goals, objectives and vision of The Big Move.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton GO Target Density: 150 Ppj/Ha Population 49
    21 20 1 6 1 0 32 33 31 35 30 29 27 28 1 8 25 26 11 24 23 34 22 37 8 9 7 1 2 1 3 6 1 7 5 1 4 1 3 2 96 79 99 78 93 / MEADOWVALE GO APRIL 16, 2020 HWY 401 MEADOWVALE BLVD ) alk n w mi 0 (1 s iu ad r m 0 0 MISSISSAUGA RD 8 DERRY RD W 82 93 77 MTSA Station, 800m Buffer Preliminary Boundary Delineation Urban Growth Centre (UGC) Designated Greenfield Area (DGA) Provincially Significant Employment 0 100 200 300 400m Zone N MTSA Preliminary Boundary Delineation Station: Meadowvale GO Corridor Type: Other Transit Corridor Area (ha) 110 Municipality: City of Mississauga Combined Station: n/a Corridor: Milton GO Target Density: 150 ppj/ha Population 49 Employment 5,174 ANALYTICAL LENS • Strategic Alignment Total Density (ppj/ha) 47.5 MOBILITY • Meadowvale GO Station, MiWay Transit Additional People and Jobs to 11,300 • Pedestrian and Cycling Multi-use Trail Achieve Target Density (ppj) • Moderate availability of vacant land MTSA 800m Radius MARKET AND GROWTH • Low development pipeline activity Area (ha) 201 POTENTIAL • Optimal parcel size and configuration 76 for intensifiation Population 2,234 LAND USE AND • Low flood risk, proximity to Mullett Creek • GP Built Up Urban Area, Provincially Significant Employment 8,230 BUILT FORM Employment Zone 52.1 Total Density (ppj/ha) • Access to quality sports and recreation facilities COMMUNITY 19,700 CONSIDERATIONS • Proximity to community amenities and parks *DataAdditional source: Scenario People 16, prepared and by Hemson Jobs Consulting to for the • Landmarks: Meadowvale Community Centre RegionAchieve
    [Show full text]