COVID-19: Pandemic:Profit:Fallout M Harrison
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
COVID-19 PANDEMIC.PROFIT.FALLOUT. Page 1 of 229 COVID-19 PANDEMIC. PROFIT. FALLOUT The information in this letter is intended to facilitate discussion and a more rigorous examination and challenge of the Australian government’s Covid-19 mitigation policies. This letter is written to compile research to support my belief that the Australian government’s declaration of a ‘human biosecurity emergency’ and ongoing enaction and enforcement of the Biosecurity Act 2015, may have been undertaken under a fraudulent premise, and may therefore be an unjustified and illegal act against the Australian people. The Australian government has not provided evidence to show that societal lockdown is proportionate to the risks of society continuing to function, with more nuanced management strategies. It has offered vague promises of ‘winning the battle” and implied threats of an apocalyptic public health meltdown if perpetual lockdown is not adhered to. This statements are supported by the advice of modellers who appear to have serious financial conflicts of interest, and who have not published the full extent of their taxpayer-funded work, to allow for external scrutiny. I believe the Australian government’s premise of the ‘fighting the Covid-19 outbreak’ may be an unjustified suspension of civil rights. It is my opinion that the Australian government’s policy response blatantly disregards the international Siracusa Principles, which indicates their policies may be in violation of international law. Melissa Harrison 21/04/2020 harrisonpublications.org Page 2 of 229 CONTENTS Introduction - COVID-19: PANDEMIC. PROFIT. FALLOUT [An Open Letter to Power] 2 PART ONE: PANDEMIC 5 Data - Criticisms & limitations 6 Johns Hopkins - Covid-19: Global dashboard 9 Covid-19: Aus, US & UK - Data & coding 12 Modelling - Informing Covid-19 policy response 15 China - Researchers diagnose ‘novel coronavirus’ 22 Germany - Professor Drosten creates PCR test 27 Australia - Doherty Institute isolates virus 32 Covid-19 Testing - Key issues: accuracy, ‘gold standard’, prevalence 37 Pandemic - Predictive or coincidence? 42 Australia - Australian government & Covid-19 74 National Covid-19 Coordination Commission - Executive Board 75 National Covid-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce - ‘Single trustworthy source’ 83 Doherty Institute - Modellers & policy advisors 87 APPRISE - Infectious disease emergencies 92 Medical Research Future Fund - State funded health & medical research 95 Australian Academy of Health & Medical Sciences - Contemplating ‘immunity certificate’ 98 CEPI - Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation 100 CEPI, Gates Foundation & University of Queensland - Rapid response vaccine partnership 104 Biosecurity Act 2015 - Unprecedented power, unchecked oversight 107 Health Minister Greg Hunt - A friend of Big Pharma? 111 Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy - Powers under the Biosecurity Act (2015) 118 PART TWO: PROFIT 120 Australian Politics & Big Pharma - Big Pharma is ‘gaming’ the government 121 Who Watches the Watchers? - Conflicts of interest in Australia’s medical advisors 126 Conflicted Regulator? Therapeutic Goods Administration 128 Conflicted Modeller? Professor Jodie McVernon 130 Conflicted Institution? Doherty Institute Director Professor Sharon Lewin 136 Conflicted Advisor? Professor Helen Marshall 138 Page 3 of 229 Conflicted Researcher? Professor Terry Nolan 145 Conflicted Inventor? Professor Ian Frazer 147 Murdoch & Big Pharma - Power & profit 151 Who & Swine Flu Fraud - Pandemic declaration triggered ‘sleeping contracts’ with Big Pharma 156 Australia & Swine Flu Fraud - Data manipulation & pre-emptive vaccines 159 Swine Flu Profiteers - Case study: Gilead 162 The White House & Blackrock - Reign of the private sector 165 ‘Global Health Imperialism’ - Vaccines as pharmaceutical colonialism 167 The Gates Foundation - Exploitation and utter lack of ethics 170 Australia & the Gates Foundation - Taxpayer-funded collaboration 175 WHO & Australia - Surrendering our sovereignty 180 CEPI & the Gates Foundation - Covid-19 vaccine accelerator 183 PART THREE: FALLOUT 187 Resolving Lockdown - Vaccines claimed the only solution 188 Victorian Government: Mandating vaccines - Andrews Government - ties with Big Pharma 192 Financial Devastation - A pandemic of poverty 197 The Bio-Surveillance State - The rise of state & surveillance capitalism 200 Human Rights Violations - Suspension of civil liberties in the Covid-19 outbreak 212 Conclusion 224 Appendix 1: Strained international healthcare systems 226 Author’s Disclaimer: While there is every effort to ensure that material in this document is accurate and up to date, such material does in no way constitute the provision of professional advice. The author does not guarantee, and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained in this report or any referenced material. Users should seek appropriate independent professional advice prior to relying on, or entering into any commitment based on material published here. This material is published for information and public interest commentary purposes alone. This opinions expressed in this document are the author's own. This Inquiry is written as a personal commentary, intended in the public interest and for political comment and for the sharing of public information. The author is not affiliated with any political party, private industry, non-profit or government organisation. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License Page 4 of 229 PART ONE PANDEMIC The novel coronavirus ‘Covid-19’ has been deemed a highly infectious pathogen and an international public health risk. The unprecedented international response has resulted in economic devastation and the virtual house arrest of billions of people. I discuss concerns surrounding the irregularities of initial diagnosis and testing procedures. There appears to be an absence of any “gold standard” test, or control groups to assess accuracy of diagnostics. Instead, without external validation, “emergency approval” has been granted by the WHO and national health authorities. Regulators like Australia’s TGA acknowledge possible inaccuracies - saying there is a possibility of false positives AND false negatives, but do not state the prevalence to which this is to be expected. Regardless, the WHO and governments are pushing wide-scale, mass genetic testing. I explore the data used in informing the Covid-19 policy response. Data which governments are relying on can be traced back to dubious sources, including social media and local news reports. International and Australian health authorities appear to be engaging in irregular Covid-19 death attribution. Some hospitals are allegedly financially incentivised to declare Covid-19 cases. The modelling used for international policy response is based on unpublished, unverified 13 year old code. Australian modellers have appear to have deep financial ties to pharmaceutical companies and conflicted global power structures such as the Gates Foundation and Gavi (Vaccine Alliance). I discuss the dark possibility of the Covid-19 ‘plandemic’ - involving a series of high profile pandemic scenarios involving the military, G20 members and global organisations like the World Economic Forum and the Gates Foundation. These ‘plandemic’ scenarios have deeply unsettling parallels to the current Covid-19 outbreak. I note one of the key advisors to the Australian government’s Covid-19 response was a member of one of these high level ‘plandemic’ panels, which involved the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation and organisations tied to the US military. I outline the relationships of Australian government organisations and vaccine manufacturers, and the troubling timelines of their Covid-19 vaccine development - which appear to have pre- empted the current crisis. I examine the ‘unprecedented, unchecked’ powers given to Health Minister Greg Hunt and Chief Medical Officer Brendan Murphy under the Biosecurity Act 2015, and Minister Hunt’s history as an apparent ‘friend of Big Pharma’. Page 5 of 229 Photo by NASA on Unsplash DATA CRITICISMS & LIMITATIONS There have been number of concerns raised about Covid-19 data including selection bias, inadequate data literacy and the misrepresentation of information to the public. Data informing government policies can be traced back to dubious sources, including social media and local news reports. This data has driven decisions to enforce the virtual house arrest of billions of people, mass unemployment, widespread impoverishment and the tearing of societal fabric itself. I find the lack of rigour appalling. I note a distasteful example of opportunistic bias in media reporting on Italy’s Covid-19 outbreak. INADEQUATE DATA LITERACY A 2019 study, ‘Virus–virus interactions impact the population dynamics of influenza and the common cold’1, examined the comparative prevalence of different viral infections detected among patients in Glasgow over a period of years. Coronaviruses made up a fluctuating percentage of all respiratory infections. Professor Wolfgang Wodarg, physician and Health Policy Adviser and Honorary Member of the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe (PACE), referred to the 2019 study in his critique of Covid-19 testing and data collection process: “Starting from 2005 to 2013 they checked which viruses occur among respiratory diseases… coronavirus [were] always in the mix. The coronaviruses normally make up 7% to 15%, maybe 5 to