The Durrell Index

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Durrell Index #01 Threats to species survival What are the biggest threats to Durrell’s target species today? How are these threats likely to change? 1000 Threat score Urban Pollution Natural development Disturbance Agriculture disaster Fires 0 Logging & Climate Invasives hunting Current threat of all species Projected future threats of all species the most important threats This indicator identifies the most important threats to Durrell’s 50+ been introduced by humans and spread rapidly, having negative target species today, the relative impact of these threats and how and sometimes catastrophic impacts on the native species. they are likely to change in the future. Not only is the score for this threat greater than all the other Durrell’s field staff assess every threat to their target species and, categories put together, with more than 900f our target species for each, score its timing (past, continuing, future), scope affected, worryingly it is predicted to increase in the future. (proportion of the population affected) and severity (size of declines caused by the threat) on a scale of 0-3. The sum of Loss of the forest and wetland homes of scores across the range of threats gives the overall ‘threat score’ our target animals through agriculture and logging, and direct for each species, allowing us to rank them in order of threat level. hunting of some species are the next biggest threats. Currently the Mountain Chicken, Montserrat Galliwasp and Bojer’s This indicator helps Durrell to identify the actions, knowledge and Skink face the highest threat levels. skills required to conserve target species and make long-term decisions on where conservation needs to be stepped up to deal The biggest threat by some distance comes from invasive species with a changing world. – animals or plants that have % 0f Durrell species under threat Invasives Climate Logging & hunting Fires Agriculture Disturbance Natural disaster Pollution urban development 00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 The mountain chicken story 01 Mountain Chicken As Durrell’s most threatened species, the Mountain Chicken is a giant frog found only in Dominica and Montserrat in the Caribbean. It faces a jaw-dropping number of threats, many of which have had a severe impact on its population. Forest loss, over-hunting, predation by invasive rats, volcanic eruptions, pollution and now a catastrophic disease called chytridiomycosis, responsible for wiping out tens of amphibian species over the past couple of decades, have taken their toll. The Mountain Chicken’s future is very uncertain and it needs all the help we can muster. Top 10 species under highest threat 01 Mountain Chicken 06 White-breasted Thrasher 02 Monrserrat Galliwasp 07 Antiguan Racer 03 Bojer’s Skink 08 Echo Parakeet 04 Orange-tailed Skink 09 Madagascar Pochard 05 Lesser Night Gecko 10 Mangrove Finch #02 Acting to save species What steps does Durrell take on the journey to save species? conservation journey When a species is on the brink of extinction, it might require decades of sustained conservation. We apply seven key actions at different times and with varying levels of effort, depending on the species’ needs. We monitor the impact of our work and revisit actions if they’re not working as planned. Top 10 species: conservation action score We measure the time spent on each action to assess the level of conservation effort for each species. Ploughshare Tortoise Echo Parakeet Pink Pigeon Alaotran Gentle Lemur Mauritius Kestrel Giant Jumping Rat Keel-scaled Boa Telfair’s Skink Lesser Night Gecko Bojer’s Skink The story of the Ploughshare Tortoise The Ploughshare Tortoise is currently top of our list in terms of conservation effort spent. In 1986 the Ploughshare Tortoise was highly threatened because its dry scrubland habitat around Baly Bay, Madagascar, was disappearing. We worked with local communities to reduce threats to the wild population such as bush fires, established a national park and set up a breeding centre to reintroduce tortoises to the wild. We were making progress. Then poaching driven by the illegal pet trade exploded, becoming the biggest risk to the tortoises’ survival. Currently, more Ploughshare Tortoises may live as pets than in the wild. There is a real possibility that this ancient reptile could become extinct; without conservation, it might have disappeared already. We are now working with the Malagasy government and our local partners to ensure our efforts so far haven’t been in vain. #03 Building the scientific evidence base From molecules to ecosystems, how does science inform Durrell’s conservation work? Ecosystems Conservation practice, People and society Populations and species Scientific output 6 planning and policy Scientific output 1 Scientific output 48 What is happening to Scientific output 21 What are the social and Where is the target our target forests and What are our economic species wetlands? How can conservation characteristics found, and what habitat they be sustainably priorities? What does it of communities that rely does it need? Why is its managed and mean for conservation on our target forests and population in decline? restored? practice and policy? wetlands? Individuals People and ecosystems Molecules Scientific output 3 Scientific output 8 Scientific output 12 How can we manage How does nature benefit How can we animals in captivity people? What difference manage to ensure the best does conservation make populations to standards of welfare to the wellbeing of maximise genetic and effective breeding communities? diversity? programmes? Science is vital to our mission Our researchers around the world help identify conservation goals, shape the way we manage species and habitats, and measure our effectiveness so we can adapt our approach. We strive to base all our conservation decisions on the best evidence available. Conservation is complex and driven by both human and environmental factors. We draw on a range of disciplines including biology, sociology, economics and earth sciences to generate the knowledge to understand each problem and design a solution that makes a difference on the ground. We’re publishing more scientific papers, articles and reports each year, on an ever-growing variety of subjects. We’re proud of that, but it doesn’t really mean anything until the knowledge is put into practice to save a species from extinction. Scientific output over time Based on number of publications 60 50 40 30 20 10 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Case in point: Tracking the Mountain Chicken The Mountain Chicken is one of the world’s largest, but most threatened, species of frog. Over the years it has been impacted by destruction of habitat, volcanic eruptions, introduced predators and hunting. But its most catastrophic killer is Chytridiomycosis, a fungal disease that has caused a 95 0ecline in its Montserrat population in just two years. We’ve been conducting cutting-edge research to find a way to restore healthy populations of Mountain Chickens. We’re tracking radiotagged frogs in the wild to understand what behaviours might cause them to be especially vulnerable; taking swabs and samples to examine genetic differences that may lead to tolerance; and releasing captively bred frogs into locations in which they might thrive. There’s still a lot of work to do with our partners in Montserrat. But this project is at the very forefront of our scientific research, and we’ve made many surprising discoveries about the unique frog along the way. We hope future generations of animals and people benefit from our discoveries. #04 Advancing Durrell’s Ark What different roles does each animal play in Durrell’s ultimate misson - conservation? Breakdown of species in collection – 2012 (Total species = 129) Conservation 36 species 7 of which are in their home countries Education 11 species Research and Training 17 species Visitor Experience 65 species Narrow-striped Sulawesi Crested Pink Pigeon Mongoose Macaque Haitian Giant Galliwasp Durrell Wildlife PArk Our founder, Gerald Durrell, held the pioneering belief that zoos should primarily act as reserves and regenerators of endangered species. So while it’s still important we provide a fun and engaging day out for families, over the years our Wildlife Park in Jersey has focused as much as possible on conservation. Today, the overarching role of our animal collection in Jersey and overseas – our ‘ark’, as Gerald would have it – is conservation. We manage breeding programmes for release back to the wild, develop the skills and tools to conserve species in the wild and communicate important messages. Based on industry-standard criteria, we allocate each animal in our collection to one of four roles: conservation, research and training, education or visitor experience. Going back in time with Durrell’s Ark Number of species 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1959 ‘65 ‘70 ‘75 ‘80 ‘85 ‘90 ‘95 ‘00 ‘05 2012 Years The role of a species may shift during its time within the collection in response to a changing situation in the wild; a new approach to the management of the captive population; evolving goals for the species; or new knowledge about the status of and threats to the species in the wild. For example, the Malagasy Giant Jumping Rat was originally brought into the collection for conservation purposes, but surveys published in 2006 showed that the wild population was much larger than previously thought, so there was less need for our breeding programme. Great news for this species, which now plays an important education role as part of our Kirindy Forest exhibit. Categorising a species is not always straightforward, so our experts meet once a year to re-evaluate the role of every animal in the Wildlife Park. We know animals thrive in their natural habitats, and we’re determined to stay true to Gerald’s vision.
Recommended publications
  • EC) No 338/97 on the Protection of Species of Wild Fauna and Flora by Regulating Trade Therein
    12.8.2010 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 212/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 709/2010 of 22 July 2010 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, (7) The species Ctenosaura bakeri, C. oedirhina, C. melanosterna, C. palearis, Agalychnis spp., Dynastes satanas, Operculicarya hyphaenoides, O. pachypus, Zygosicyos pubescens, Z. Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European tripartitus, Aniba rosaeodora (with annotation), Adenia Union, olaboensis, Cyphostemma elephantopus, C. montagnacii and Bulnesia sarmientoi (with annotation) have been included in Appendix II. Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna 1 and flora by regulating trade therein ( ), and in particular (8) The Appendix II listing of Beccariophoenix madagascariensis Article 19(5) thereof, and Neodypsis decaryi was extended to include seeds from Madagascar. Whereas: (9) The following species have been deleted from Appendix III to the Convention at the request of Malaysia: Arbo­ (1) Regulation (EC) No 338/97 lists animal and plant species rophila campbelli, Arborophila charltonii, Caloperdix oculeus, in respect of which trade is restricted or controlled. Lophura erythrophthalma, Lophura ignita, Melanoperdix niger, Those lists incorporate the lists set out in the Appendices Polyplectron inopinatum, Rhizothera dulitensis, Rhizothera to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered longirostris and Rollulus rouloul, and the species Haliotis Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, hereinafter ‘the midae has been deleted from Appendix III to the Convention’.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptile Diversity in an Amazing Tropical Environment: the West Indies - L
    TROPICAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT - Vol. VIII - Reptile Diversity In An Amazing Tropical Environment: The West Indies - L. Rodriguez Schettino REPTILE DIVERSITY IN AN AMAZING TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT: THE WEST INDIES L. Rodriguez Schettino Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Systematics, Cuba To the memory of Ernest E. Williams and Austin Stanley Rand Keywords: Reptiles, West Indies, geographic distribution, morphological and ecological diversity, ecomorphology, threatens, conservation, Cuba Contents 1. Introduction 2. Reptile diversity 2.1. Morphology 2.2.Habitat 3. West Indian reptiles 3.1. Greater Antilles 3.2. Lesser Antilles 3.3. Bahamas 3.4. Cuba (as a study case) 3.4.1. The Species 3.4.2. Geographic and Ecological Distribution 3.4.3. Ecomorphology 3.4.4. Threats and Conservation 4. Conclusions Acknowledgments Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary The main features that differentiate “reptiles” from amphibians are their dry scaled tegument andUNESCO their shelled amniotic eggs. In– modern EOLSS studies, birds are classified under the higher category named “Reptilia”, but the term “reptiles” used here does not include birds. One can externally identify at least, three groups of reptiles: turtles, crocodiles, and lizards and snakes. However, all of these three groups are made up by many species that are differentSAMPLE in some morphological characters CHAPTERS like number of scales, color, size, presence or absence of limbs. Also, the habitat use is quite variable; there are reptiles living in almost all the habitats of the Earth, but the majority of the species are only found in the tropical regions of the world. The West Indies is a region of special interest because of its tropical climate, the high number of species living on the islands, the high level of endemism, the high population densities of many species, and the recognized adaptive radiation that has occurred there in some genera, such as Anolis, Sphaerodactylus, and Tropidophis.
    [Show full text]
  • KHS Newsletter, No. 50 December 1982
    KANSAS HIRPITOLOGICAL SOCIETY KHS Newsletter, No. 50 December 1982 KHS MEMBERS NOTE 1983 KHS MEETING AND FIELD TRIP DATES Listed below are the meeting dates and locations for the 1983 KHS field trips and the lOth ANNIVERSARY MEETING. Please mark these on your calendar, and plan to attend as many as you can. More detailed information will appear in forthcoming KHS Newsletter issues. - 1. Field Trip. 29 April - 1 May. Toronto Reservoir, Woodson County. Host: John Fraser (316) 378-3138. 2. Field Trip. 27-29 May. Meade County State Lake. Host: Kelly J. Irwin (913) 864-3573 or (913) 864-5587. 3. Field Trip. 16-18 September. Bourbon County State Lake. Host: Larry Miller (316) 845-2680. 4. lOth Anniversary Annual Meeting. 12-13 November. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Lawrence. Host: Joseph T. Collins (913) 864-4920. 1982 FALL FIELD TRIP HELD IN BUTLER COUNTY, KANSAS The final field trip for the KHS during 1982 was held at the Butler County Fishing Lake located south of El Dorado, Kansas. There were about a dozen and a half members and friends at the meeting and campout. The group spent some time exploring the cave near El Dorado the morning of the 18th of September. A northern water snake, some cricket frogs, leopard frogs, and bullfrogs were found near and in the damp cave. Collecting was done in many areas of Butler and Cowley counties during the weekend. The amphibians and reptiles collected frotn each county include: BUTLER COUNTY Small-mouthed Salamander (Ambystoma texanum) Blanchard's Cricket Frog (Acris crepitans blanchardi) (continued next page) \ \ One of the youn·ger herpers from Emporia looks over some of the carvings on the cave walls during the trip to the cave during the fall KHS meeting in Butler County, Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • P. 1 AC18 Inf. 11 (English Only/ Seulement En Anglais
    AC18 Inf. 11 (English only/ Seulement en anglais/ Únicamente en inglés) THE POTENTIAL TO BREED APPENDIX-I REPTILES IN CAPTIVITY A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT IUCN/SSC Crocodile Specialist Group Florida Museum of Natural History Gainesville FL 32611 USA Background and Purpose Article VII.4 of the Convention provides for specimens of Appendix I species that have been bred in captivity, or artificially propagated, to be deemed to be specimens of species included in Appendix-II for the purposes of exports for commercial purposes. Implementation of this provision of the Convention has required commercial captive breeding operations to be registered with the Secretariat. The registration process has entailed a complicated and sometimes lengthy process involving scrutiny of the application through correspondence by the Secretariat, relevant experts and the Parties. As a consequence, the extent to which Parties have adopted the registration procedure has been has been limited. Numerous Parties authorize exports of Captive-bred specimens of Appendix-I species in accordance with Article III, paragraph 3(a), of the Convention. Resolution Conf. 11.14 (Gigiri, 2000) establishes a new approach to the registration process in an effort to streamline and simplify the procedure. Pursuant to Resolution Conf. 11.14, the Parties have agreed to compile an annex comprising “a list of Appendix-I species that are critically endangered in the wild and/or difficult to keep or breed in captivity”. In the same Resolution, the Parties also agreed: “that determination of whether or not to apply the exemptions of Article VII, paragraph 4, for the export of specimens of Appendix-I animals bred in captivity for commercial purposes, where the species are not included in Annex 3 to the Resolution, remains the responsibility of the Management Authority of the exporting Party on the advice of the Scientific Authority that each operation complies with the provisions of Resolution Conf.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Island Biodiversity
    Contents Mauritian reptiles Restoring island biodiversity: Mauritian reptiles Restoration and research the reintroduction of endemic Mauritian reptiles Skinks and geckos The Darwin Initiative project Dr Nicholas Cole University of Bristol Project protocol and timetable Dr Carl Jones Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Mauritian reptiles Mauritian reptiles Once one of the richest reptile diversities in the World This adaptive radiation caused the formation of a unique ecosystem In the absence of terrestrial mammals the reptiles evolved to occupy all available niches dependent upon reptiles Allowed adaptive radiation of: Tortoises Nocturnal and diurnal geckos Skinks Reptiles occupied all main functional Snakes groups: Mauritian reptiles Mauritian reptiles Predators: Prey: 1 Mauritian reptiles Mauritian reptiles Grazers and browsers: Seed dispersers: Mauritian reptiles Mauritian reptiles Pollinators: Human related disturbances over the past 400 years: Extensive habitat destruction Introduction of non-native predators and competitors More than 60% of reptile species lost from the main island through extinction or extirpation The majority of the extant species are now confined to offshore islands Mauritian reptiles Restoration and research Remaining island populations: Round Island Most intact reptile fauna of the Mascarenes Restricted and/or fragmented distributions Never invaded by predatory mammals or reptiles The loss of ecological links and food webs Habitat destruction caused
    [Show full text]
  • 990 PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES CONVENTION Subpart A—Introduction
    Pt. 23 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–01 Edition) Service agent, or other game law en- 23.36 Schedule of public meetings and no- forcement officer free and unrestricted tices. access over the premises on which such 23.37 Federal agency consultation. operations have been or are being con- 23.38 Modifications of procedures and nego- ducted; and shall furnish promptly to tiating positions. such officer whatever information he 23.39 Notice of availability of official re- may require concerning such oper- port. ations. Subpart E—Scientific Authority Advice (c) The authority to take golden ea- [Reserved] gles under a depredations control order issued pursuant to this subpart D only Subpart F—Export of Certain Species authorizes the taking of golden eagles when necessary to seasonally protect 23.51 American ginseng (Panax domesticated flocks and herds, and all quinquefolius). such birds taken must be reported and 23.52 Bobcat (Lynx rufus). turned over to a local Bureau Agent. 23.53 River otter (Lontra canadensis). 23.54 Lynx (Lynx canadensis). 23.55 Gray wolf (Canis lupus). PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES 23.56 Brown bear (Ursus arctos). CONVENTION 23.57 American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Subpart A—Introduction AUTHORITY: Convention on International Sec. Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna 23.1 Purpose of regulations. and Flora, 27 U.S.T. 1087; and Endangered 23.2 Scope of regulations. Species Act of 1973, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 23.3 Definitions. 1531 et seq. 23.4 Parties to the Convention. SOURCE: 42 FR 10465, Feb. 22, 1977, unless Subpart B—Prohibitions, Permits and otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Harris, Nyeema Charmaine
    ABSTRACT HARRIS, NYEEMA CHARMAINE. The Biogeography of Carnivore Hosts and their Parasites: Implications for Conservation in North America. (Under the director of Drs. Robert R. Dunn and Stacy A.C. Nelson.) Much effort in ecology seeks to understand what processes maintain and erode patterns in biological diversity. However, little effort has focused on understanding determinants of species diversity for parasites; despite them being speciose and detrimental. Overall, my dissertation research aims to disentangle the mechanisms responsible for generating variation in parasite diversity across space and among species using carnivores as focal hosts. Carnivores are a useful model group because the order Carnivora includes species that vary in their geographic extent as well as their rarity/abundance. As a consequence, the parasites of carnivores comprise both abundant species with potential as zoonotic vectors (e.g., raccoons and rabies) and parasites likely to be in need of conservation. Chapter 1: Using host associations to understand spatial patterns of variation in parasites of North American Carnivores. I developed a parasite diversity model based on known host associations with 29 North American carnivores. Because wide-ranging hosts disproportionately contributed to total and specialist parasite diversity, conservation programs that focus on these common hosts may capture much biological diversity, but also unwittingly sources of human diseases. I supply the first parasite diversity model to understand broad scale patterns in species richness for North American carnivores, which can inform both future parasite conservation and disease management efforts. Chapter 2: The influence of carnivore extinction on the composition and geography of zoonotic parasites. I used presence-absence matrices of host-parasite associations for 29 North American carnivore species and simulated the corresponding changes in parasite community composition and diversity with the random extinction of hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Keel-Scaled Boa, Casarea Dussumieri
    Keel-scaled boa, Casarea dussumieri Photo by Johannes Chambon Compiler: Aurelie Hector Contributors: Nik Cole, Johannes Chambon, Luke A’Bear, Jamie Dunlop, Mala Currooah, Phil Lambdon, Beth Govier, Sarah West Suggested citation: Hector, A. (2018) Survival Blueprint for the conservation and management of Keel-scaled boa Casarea dussumieri in Mauritius. An output from the EDGE of Existence fellowship, Zoological Society of London. 1. STATUS REVIEW 1.1 Taxonomy: Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Reptilia Order Squamata Family: Bolyeriidae The keel-scaled boa Casarea dussumieri, also known as the Round Island boa and the split-jaw snake, is a nonvenomous constrictor. This species is the only living representative of the Bolyeriidae Family. Endemic to Mauritius, there is no subspecies. 1.2 Distribution and population status: The keel-scaled boa became restricted to Round Island (219 ha) during the mid-1800s due to the invasion of introduced mammalian predators, mainly rats Rattus norvegicus and R. rattus everywhere else in Mauritius (Cheke & Hume 2008). Based on sub- fossilised bone deposits and historical encounters the spe cies was once found on the mainland of Mauritius and other islets, including Gunner's Quoin (0.70 km2), Flat Island (2.53 km2) and Ile de la Passe (0.02 km2) (Arnold 1980, Cheke 1987, Cheke & Hume 2008). Seventy young healthy adult boas of equal sex-ratio were reintroduced to Gunner’s Quoin from Round Island between 2012 and 2014, where a population is now growing and dispersing across the island (Cole et al. 2013, Goder et al. 2015). The annual survival estimate calculated was 88.6% with 95% confidence intervals of 79.5% and 93.9% for the Boa on Round Island (Hector unpublished data 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Inventory Durrell Wildife Conservation Trust
    Animal Inventory Durrell Wildife Conservation Trust Columns 1. Number of animals in the collection on 1st January 2013 2. Number of animals born or hatched in 2013 3. Number of animals imported in 2013 4. Number of animals that died in 2013, apart from those in column 5 5. Number of animals which died in 2013 within 30 days of birth or hatching 6. Number of animals exported in 2013 7. Number of animals in the collection of 31st December 2013 Key: M = male, F = female, U = sex undetermined, ? = unknown 1234567 Status Status Scientific name Common name BirthsAcquisitions Deaths Juv. Deaths Dispositions 1 Jan. 2013 31 Dec. 2013 MFU MFU MFU MFU MFU MFU MFU Invertebrata Mollusca Gastropoda Achatinidae Achatina fulica giant East African snail 0 0 9 ? ? ? - - - ? ? ? ? ? ? - - - 0 0 11 Archachatina marginata West African land snail 0 0 3 ? ? ? - - - ? ? ? - - - - - - 0 0 1 Arthropoda Atyidae Caridina japonica Japanese algae-eating shrimp 0 0 60 ? ? ? - - - ? ? ? ? ? ? - - - 0 0 10 Insecta Blattellidae Gromphadorhina portentosa Madagascar hissing cockroach 1 3 5 ? ? ? 26 24 20 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 7 11 0 Bacteriidae Extatosoma tiaratum giant prickly walkingstick 2 2 14 0 0 7 - - - - - - - - - ? ? ? 0 12 13 Diplopoda Spirostreptidae Spirostreptus giganteus giant millipede 0 0 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 2 Chordata Vertebrata Characidae Paracheirodon axelrodi Cardinal tetra 0 0 85 ? ? ? - - - ? ? ? ? ? ? - - - 0 0 42+ Callichthyidae Corydoras trilineatus threelined catfish 0 0 47 ? ? ? - - - ? ? ? ? ? ? - - - 0 0 50+ Loricariidae Ancistrus
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Inventory Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust
    Animal Inventory Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust 1st January 2010 Births Received Deaths including DNS Exported 31st December 2010 Scientific name Common name Male Female Unknown Male Female Unknown Male Female Unknown Male Female Unknown Male Female Unknown Male Female Unknown Mollusca Gastropoda Partulidae Partula taeniata nucleola Partula Snail 0 0 231 ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 0 258 Achatinidae Achatina fulica Giant African Snail 002??? ??? 002 Archachatina marginata Snail 007??? ??? 007 Arthropoda Atyidae Caridina japonica Japanese Algae-eating Shrimp 007 002 Insecta Blattellidae Gromphadorhina portentosa Madagascar Hissing Cockroach 0 0 12 ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 0 16 Bacteriidae Extatosoma tiaratum Giant Prickly Walkingstick 0 0 34 ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 0 14 Diplopoda Spirostreptidae Archispirostreptus Giant African Millipede 002??? ??? 002 Characidae Hasemania nana False Silvertipped Tetra 0010 0010 Hyphessobrycon flammeus Flame Tetra 009001 008 Paracheirodon axelrodi Cardinal Tetra 0010 0010 Atheriniformes Bedotiidae Bedotia geayi Madagascar Rainbowfish 0 0 38 0 0 1 0 0 37 Cyprinodontiformes Aplochillinae Pachypanchax sakaramyi Panchax 0015 0015 Perciformes Cichlidae Paretroplus kieneri Kieneri Cichlid 0 0 30 0 0 21 0 0 9 Amphibia Typhlonectidae Typhlonectes natans Aquatic Caecilian 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 2 0 0 12 0 0 12 Salamandridae Euproctus platycephalus Sardinian Brook Salamander 0 0 12 001004007 Bufonidae Bufo galeatus Toad 0 0 30 0021200025 Bufo marinus Giant Marine Toad 4 6 0 460 Nectophrynoides viviparus Toad 5 6 6 031 535 Pedostibes hosii Climbing
    [Show full text]
  • The Available Name for the Taxonomic Group Uniting Boas and Pythons
    70 (3): 291 – 304 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2020. 2020 Constrictores Oppel, 1811 – the available name for the taxonomic group uniting boas and pythons Georgios L. Georgalis 1, 2, * & Krister T. Smith 3, 4 1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso 35, Torino, 10125, Italy — 2 Department of Ecology, Labora- tory of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina, Bratislava, 84215, Slovakia — 3 Department of Messel Research and Mammalogy, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberganlage 25, Frankfurt am Main, 60325, Germany — 4 Faculty of Biological Sciences, Institute for Ecology, Diversity and Evolution, Max-von-Laue- Straße 13, University of Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany — * Corresponding author; [email protected] Submitted April 25, 2020. Accepted June 17, 2020. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/vertebrate-zoology on June 26, 2020. Published in print on Q3/2020. Editor in charge: Uwe Fritz Abstract Recent advances in the phylogenetic relationships of snakes using both molecular and morphological data have generally demonstrated a close relationship between boas and pythons but also induced nomenclatural changes that rob the least inclusive clade to which both belong of a name. This name would be tremendously useful, because it is the least inclusive group to which a large number of fossil boa-like or python-like taxa can be assigned. Accordingly, an update of higher-level nomenclature is desirable. We herein provide an overview of all the names that have historically been applied to boas and pythons. We show that the earliest name for the supra-familial group encompass- ing boas and pythons is Constrictores Oppel, 1811.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Ten Species Reliant on Zoos 2012
    Top Ten Species Reliant on Zoos 2012 Compiled by: Andrew R. Marshall, Janine E. Robinson, Bethan Hindle and the BIAZA Field Programmes Committee Leptodactylus fallax) Mountain chicken ( • One of the world’s largest frog species. • Threats include exploitation, habitat damage, introduced predators and a deadly fungus. • The future of this species may rely on successful reintroductions from captive bred populations. • The Mountain Chicken Recovery Programme is a collaboration between zoos and the governments of Montserrat and Dominica. • Amphibians are highly endangered; around 32% Mountain chicken, Chester Zoo of described species are threatened. Despite what you might imagine from its name this species is Critically Endangered actually one of the largest species of frog in the world. This frog got its unusual name from its chicken-like taste, which made it into a traditional West Indian dish. Once found on maybe as many as seven Caribbean islands, the effects of habitat loss, introduced species and over-exploitation have reduced its range to only two islands; Montserrat and Dominica. However it was the introduction of the pathogenic chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatids (‘Bd’ for short), that has brought the species to the edge of extinction. Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust has worked with the biodiversity of Montserrat for a number of years and first brought 13 to its Wildlife Park in Jersey in 1999 to form a captive breeding programme. The threats of Bd to mountain chickens were known from Dominica, where the introduction of the pathogen caused over 90% declines in population numbers within a very short space of time. Alerted by the appearance of dead frogs by the Montserrat Department of Environment in February 2009, a rescue mission was mounted to bring 50 frogs into a bio-secure captive breeding programme.
    [Show full text]