DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Complete Work

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Complete Work AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Paxton, H., 1986. Generic revision and relationships of the family Onuphidae (Annelida: Polychaeta). Records of the Australian Museum 38(1): 1–74. [27 June 1986]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.38.1986.175 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia Records of the Australian Museum (1986) Vol. 38: 1-74. Generic Revision and Relationships of the Family Onuphidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) HANNELORE P AXTON School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia. ABSTRACT. The general morphology, reproduction and development of the family Onuphidae are reviewed and supplemented with new observations, emphasizing ontogenetic changes. The following features were found to be associated with the juvenile state: distinctive colour pattern, ceratophores of antennae with few rings, absence of frontal palps and tentacular cirri, presence of eyes, smaller number of modified setigers, lesser developed branchiae, early occurrence of sub acicular hooks', presence of compound falcigers in anterior and far posterior setigers. Five new genera are described, bringing the number of recognized genera in the family to 22. A key, diagnoses and illustrated definitions to all genera are given. The relationships within the family are analyzed using morphological, ecological and life history characters. Two subfamilies: Hyalinoeciinae, n. subf., and Onuphinae are erected. The two subfamilies differ in the presence or absence of notosetae, position of sub acicular hooks and lower limbate setae, number of anal cirri, primary envelope of oocytes and arrangement of their nurse cells. Two groups of genera are recognized in each subfamily. The Hyalinoeciinae includes the Nothria group (consisting of Nothria and Anchinothria, n. gen.) and the Hyalinoecia group (consisting of Hyalinoecia; Leptoecia; Neonuphis; HyalospiniJera). The Onuphinae includes the Diopatra group (consisting of Notonuphis; Paradiopatra; Diopatra; Epidiopatra; Brevibrachium, n. gen.; Longibrachium, n. gen.; Rhamphobrachium; Americonuphis) and the Onuphis group (consisting of Australonuphis; Hartmanonuphis, n. gen.; Hirsutonuphis, n. gen.; Aponuphis; Kinbergonuphis; Mooreonuphis; Onuphis; Heptaceras). It is hypothesized that the Onuphidae have a southern centre of origin and radiated from epifaunal habitats to world-wide distributions from the shallowest to the deepest depths. PAXTON, HANNELORE, 1986. Generic revision and relationships of the family Onuphidae (Annelida: Polychaeta). Records of the Australian Museum 38(1): 1-74. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS .................................................... 3 GENERAL MORPHOLOGY ....................................................... 4 Prostomium .................................................................... 5 Peristomium .................................................................... 9 Para podia ...................................................................... 9 Setae ......................................................................... 12 Eversible Pharynx .............................................................. 14 2 Records of the Australian Museum 38 Pygi.:iium ...................................................................... 16 Tubes ......................................................................... 16 Size ........................................................................... 16 REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT ......................................... 16 Reproduction .................................................................. 16 Juvenile Development ........................................................... 18 General Juvenile Characters of Onuphidae ........................................ 19 TAXONOMIC ACCOUNT ........................................................ 22 Key to Genera of Onuphidae .................................................... 23 Family Onuphidae .............................................................. 25 Hyalinoeciinae n. subf. ....................................................... 25 Nothria Malmgren ... .. 25 Anchinothria n. gen ......................................................... 27 Hyalinoecia Malmgren ...................................................... 29 Leptoecia Chamberlin ...................................................... , 30 Neonuphis Kucheruk ....................................................... 32 HyalospiniJera Kucheruk .................................................... 34 Subfamily Onuphinae ......................................................... 35 Notonuphis Kucheruk ....... .. 35 Paradiopatra Ehlers ........................................................ 36 Diopatra Audouin & Milne Edwards ................. .. 38 Epidiopatra Augener ....................................................... , 41 Brevibrachium n. gen. ...................................................... 41 Longibrachium n. gen ....................................................... 43 Rhamphobrachium Ehlers ................................................... 44 Americonuphis Fauchald .................................................... 45 Australonuphis Paxton ...................................................... 46 Hartmanonuphis n. gen. .................................................... 49 Hirsutonuphis n. gen ........................................................ 51 Aponuphis Kucheruk ....................................................... 53 Kinbergonuphis Fauchald ................................................... 54 Mooreonuphis Fauchald ..................................................... 56 Onuphis Audouin & Milne Edwards .......................................... 56 Heptaceras Ehlers .......................................................... 58 PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS .............................................. 60 Discussion of Characters and Their States ......................................... 61 Relationships Within the Onuphidae .............................................. 65 Identikit Picture of the Uronuphid ............................................... 68 ZOOGEOGRAPHY AND CONCLUSION .......................................... 68 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................ 70 REFERENCES .................................................................. 70 Members of the family Onuphidae (order Eunicida) Central and South America and in eastern Australia. are mostly tubicolous, range from a few centimetres to They are known as 'beachworms' in Australia and are the longest polychaetes ever reported (3 metres) and highly sought after for fishing bait, collected from surf occur in all oceans from intertidal to the deepest depths. beaches during low tides by amateurs and professional Onuphids used to be considered as predominantly deep­ collectors. The study of these beachworms (Paxton, water species (McIntosh, 1910) that lived permanently 1979) has led to the present revision of the family. in rather sturdy tubes (Pettibone, 1963). However, many Order Eunicida. The order Eunicida includes seven shallow water species with fragile tubes are now known of the 81 extant families of polychaetes (Fauchald, 1977) (Fauchald, 1980). A number of species, some of large and eight of the extinct families (Kielan-Jaworowska, size with very fragile, temporary tubes occur in sandy 1966). Members of the order share the possession of a beaches, predominantly in the southern oceans. The ventral eversible pharynx with a complex jaw apparatus largest of these, species of Australonuphis, occur in consisting of ventral mandibles and dorsal maxillae. The Paxton: Revision of Onuphidae 3 jaws are composed, to a large extent, of calcium and The characters employed for generic separation were magnesium carbonates and, to a smaller extent, of presence or absence of tentacular cirri, presence or sclerotized proteins (Jeuniaux, 1975). The jaw apparatus absence of branchiae, and the structure of branchial is an autapomorphic feature, marking the Eunicida as filaments when present. The modification of the a monophyletic group. Although a number of other anterior para podia and their specialized setae were polychaete families have jaws (see Wolf, 1976), their generally not used as characters, except for chemical composition differs markedly from that of the Rhamphobrachium Ehlers, 1887. Eunicida, suggesting that the Eunicida represent a About 220 species have been described; most of these "phylogenetic line distinct from that of other 'errant' have been in the genera Onuphis and Nothria, which predacious polychaetes" (Voss-Foucart et al., 1973). contained 60 and 40 species respectively as accepted by The jaw apparatuses of Eunicida consist of four Fauchald (1977). The division between Onuphis and types: Placognatha (Kielan-l aworowska, 1966), Nothria on the basis of their branchial structure (sensu Ctenognatha (Kielan-l aworowska, '1966), Prionognatha Hartman, 1944) was presumed artificial (Fauchald, (Ehlers, 1868) and Labidognatha (Ehlers, 1868). The 1968) but was retained for convenience. The former two types are characterized by having rows of unsatisfactory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary
    July 15, 2013 Final Report Project SR12-002: Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary Gary L. Taghon, Rutgers University, Project Manager [email protected] Judith P. Grassle, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Charlotte M. Fuller, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Rosemarie F. Petrecca, Rutgers University, Co-Manager and Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Patricia Ramey, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt Germany, Co-Manager [email protected] Thomas Belton, NJDEP Project Manager and NJDEP Research Coordinator [email protected] Marc Ferko, NJDEP Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Bob Schuster, NJDEP Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring [email protected] Introduction The Barnegat Bay ecosystem is potentially under stress from human impacts, which have increased over the past several decades. Benthic macroinvertebrates are commonly included in studies to monitor the effects of human and natural stresses on marine and estuarine ecosystems. There are several reasons for this. Macroinvertebrates (here defined as animals retained on a 0.5-mm mesh sieve) are abundant in most coastal and estuarine sediments, typically on the order of 103 to 104 per meter squared. Benthic communities are typically composed of many taxa from different phyla, and quantitative measures of community diversity (e.g., Rosenberg et al. 2004) and the relative abundance of animals with different feeding behaviors (e.g., Weisberg et al. 1997, Pelletier et al. 2010), can be used to evaluate ecosystem health. Because most benthic invertebrates are sedentary as adults, they function as integrators, over periods of months to years, of the properties of their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacksonville, Florida 1998 Odmds Benthic Community Assessment
    JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 1998 ODMDS BENTHIC COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 61 Forsyth St. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Prepared by Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. 8060 Cottage Hill Rd. Mobile, Alabama 36695 (334) 633-6100 November 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………….……………………………3 LIST OF FIGURES ……………………..………………………………………………..4 1.0 INTRODUCTION ………..…………………………………………………………..5 2.0 METHODS ………..…………………………………………………………………..5 2.1 Sample Collection And Handling ………………………………………………5 2.2 Macroinfaunal Sample Analysis ……………………………………………….6 3.0 DATA ANALYSIS METHODS ……..………………………………………………6 3.1 Assemblage Analyses ..…………………………………………………………6 3.2 Faunal Similarities ……………………………………………………….…….8 4.0 HABITAT CHARACTERISTICS ……………………………………………….…8 5.0 BENTHIC COMMUNITY CHARACTERIZATION ……………………………..9 5.1 Faunal Composition, Abundance, And Community Structure …………………9 5.2 Numerical Classification Analysis …………………………………………….10 5.3 Taxa Assemblages …………………………………………………………….11 6.0 1995 vs 1998 COMPARISONS ……………………………………………………..11 7.0 SUMMARY ………………………………………………………………………….13 8.0 LITERATURE CITED ……………………………………………………………..16 2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Station locations for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 2. Sediment data for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 3. Summary of abundance of major taxonomic groups for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 4. Abundance and distribution of major taxonomic groups at each station for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 5. Abundance and distribution of taxa for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 6. Percent abundance of dominant taxa (> 5% of the total assemblage) for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS, June 1998. Table 7. Summary of assemblage parameters for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS stations, June 1998. Table 8. Analysis of variance table for density differences between stations for the Jacksonville, Florida ODMDS stations, June 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Eunice (Eunicidae, Polychaete, Annelida)
    Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082© 2007 The Linnean Society of London? 2007 1502 413434 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF EUNICEJ. ZANOL ET AL. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2007, 150, 413–434. With 12 figures A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Eunice (Eunicidae, polychaete, Annelida) JOANA ZANOL1*, KRISTIAN FAUCHALD2 and PAULO C. PAIVA3 1Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Museu Nacional/UFRJ, Quinta da Boa Vista s/n°, São Cristovão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20940–040, Brazil 2Department of Invertebrate Zoology, NMNH, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, NHB MRC 0163, Washington, DC 20013–7012, USA 3Departamento de Zoologia, Insituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CCS, Bloco A, Sala A0-104, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 2240–590, Brazil Received April 2006; accepted for publication December 2006 Species of Eunice are distributed worldwide, inhabiting soft and hard marine bottoms. Some of these species play sig- nificant roles in coral reef communities and others are commercially important. Eunice is the largest and most poorly defined genus in Eunicidae. It has traditionally been subdivided in taxonomically informal groups based on the colour and dentition of subacicular hooks, and branchial distribution. The monophyly of Eunice and of its informal subgroups is tested here using cladistic analyses of 24 ingroup species based on morphological data. In the phylo- genetic hypothesis resulting from the present analyses Eunice and its subgroups are paraphyletic; the genus may be divided in at least two monophyletic groups, Eunice s.s. and Leodice, but several species do not fall inside these two groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaetal Type Diversity Increases During Evolution of Eunicida (Annelida)
    Org Divers Evol (2016) 16:105–119 DOI 10.1007/s13127-015-0257-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Chaetal type diversity increases during evolution of Eunicida (Annelida) Ekin Tilic1 & Thomas Bartolomaeus1 & Greg W. Rouse2 Received: 21 August 2015 /Accepted: 30 November 2015 /Published online: 15 December 2015 # Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2015 Abstract Annelid chaetae are a superior diagnostic character Keywords Chaetae . Molecular phylogeny . Eunicida . on species and supraspecific levels, because of their structural Systematics variety and taxon specificity. A certain chaetal type, once evolved, must be passed on to descendants, to become char- acteristic for supraspecific taxa. Therefore, one would expect Introduction that chaetal diversity increases within a monophyletic group and that additional chaetae types largely result from transfor- Chaetae in annelids have attracted the interest of scientist for a mation of plesiomorphic chaetae. In order to test these hypoth- very long time, making them one of the most studied, if not the eses and to explain potential losses of diversity, we take up a most studied structures of annelids. This is partly due to the systematic approach in this paper and investigate chaetation in significance of chaetal features when identifying annelids, Eunicida. As a backbone for our analysis, we used a three- since chaetal structure and arrangement are highly constant gene (COI, 16S, 18S) molecular phylogeny of the studied in species and supraspecific taxa. Aside from being a valuable eunicidan species. This phylogeny largely corresponds to pre- source for taxonomists, chaetae have also been the focus of vious assessments of the phylogeny of Eunicida. Presence or many studies in functional ecology (Merz and Edwards 1998; absence of chaetal types was coded for each species included Merz and Woodin 2000; Merz 2015; Pernet 2000; Woodin into the molecular analysis and transformations for these char- and Merz 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Tube Epifaum of the Polychaete Phyllopchaetopterus Socialis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science (1995) 41, 91–100 Tube epifauna of the Polychaete Phyllochaetopterus socialis Claparède Rosebel Cunha Nalessoa, Luíz Francisco L. Duarteb, Ivo Pierozzi Jrc and Eloisa Fiorim Enumod aDepartamento de Zoologia, CCB, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 50670-901, Recife, PE, Brazil, bDepartamento de Zoologia, Instituto Biologia, C.P. 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13.081-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil, cEmbrapa, NMA, Av. Dr. Julio Soares de Arruda, 803 CEP 13.085, Campinas, SP, Brazil and dProtebras, Rua Turmalina, 79 CEP 13.088, Campinas, SP, Brazil Received 8 October 1992 and in revised form 22 June 1994 Keywords: Polychaeta; tubes; faunal association; epifauna; São Sebastião Channel; Brazil Animals greater than 1 mm, found among tangled tubes of Phyllochaetopterus socialis (Chaetopteridae) from Araçá Beach, São Sebastião district, Brazil, were studied for 1 year, with four samples in each of four seasons. They comprised 10 338 individuals in 1722·7 g dry weight of polychaete tubes, with Echino- dermata, Polychaeta (not identified to species) and Crustacea as the dominant taxa. The Shannon–Wiener diversity index did not vary seasonally, only two species (a holothurian and a pycnogonid) showing seasonal variation. Ophiactis savignyi was the dominant species, providing 45·5% of individuals. Three other ophiuroids, the holothurian Synaptula hidriformis, the crustaceans Leptochelia savignyi, Megalobrachium soriatum and Synalpheus fritzmuelleri, the sipunculan Themiste alutacea and the bivalve Hiatella arctica were all abundant, but most of the 68 species recorded occurred sparsely.
    [Show full text]
  • Merimbula Bay Algal Bloom Study
    ` FINAL REPORT Prepared for Bega Valley Shire Council Zingel Place, Bega 9 January 2013 PROJECT REFERENCE: JN12061 Document Information Author (s): Dr Nicholas Yee Andrew Roberts Project Manager: Dr Nicholas Yee Date: 9 January 2013 Reviewed by: Dr Jaimie Potts (OEH) Status: Final Filename: JN12061_Merimbula Bay Algal Bloom_R100c Project: Elgin JN12061 Merimbula Bay Algal Bloom Study Contact: Elgin Associates Pty Ltd ABN 59123488639 Level 1, 45-47 Church Street, PO Box 829 Bega, New South Wales, 2550 Telephone: +61 400 365 234 Fax: +61 3 86486336 www.elgin.com.au Record of Report Distribution No of Status Date Prepared for: copies 1 digital Draft 26 September 2012 OEH 1 digital Draft 1 November 2012 OEH, BVSC 1 digital Final 9 January 2013 OEH, EPA, BVSC © Elgin Associates Pty Ltd * Elgin Associates Pty Ltd (Elgin Associates) has prepared this document for the purpose which is described in the Scope of Works section, and was based on information provided by the client, Elgin Associates understanding of the site conditions, and Elgin Associates experience, with regard to the assumptions that Elgin Associates can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. * This document was prepared for the sole use of the party identified on the cover sheet, and that party is the only intended beneficiary of Elgin Associates work. * No other party should rely on the document without the prior written consent of Elgin Associates, and Elgin Associates undertakes no duty to, nor accepts any responsibility to, any third party who may rely upon this document. * All rights reserved. No section or element of this document may be removed from this document, extracted, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the prior written permission of Elgin Associates.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging and Mobility in Three Species of Aciculata (Annelida: Polychaeta)
    FORAGING AND MOBILITY IN THREE SPECIES OF ACICULATA (ANNELIDA: POLYCHAETA) PARDO, E. V. and AMARAL, A. C. Z. Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, C. P. 6109, CEP 13083-970, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil Correspondence to: Erica Veronica Pardo, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, C. P. 6109, CEP 13083-970, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, e-mail: [email protected] Received February 3, 2005 – Accepted August 22, 2005 – Distributed November 1, 2006 (With 1 figure) ABSTRACT Aspects of feeding, such as food capture and ingestion, as well as mobility of the polychaetes Eurythoe complanata, Marphysa formosa and Diopatra aciculata, from São Sebastião Channel (São Sebastião, state of São Paulo) were observed in laboratory conditions. Eurythoe complanata, a carnivorous species, fed exclusively on pieces of fish with the aid of strong muscular retractable lips, and detected the presence of food by chemical stimuli. Diopatra aciculata, an omnivorous species, captured and ingested different kinds of food with the aid of its jaws, generating a flow of water through its tube by which it detects the presence of food and oxygenates its gills. Marphysa formosa also used its jaws to bite and lacerate food. These species showed greater or lesser degrees of intolerance to light. Keywords: foraging, mobility, Aciculata, Polychaeta, Annelida. RESUMO Forrageamento e mobilidade em Polychaeta Alguns aspectos da atividade alimentar, tais como a captura e ingestão de alimento, bem como a mobilidade dos poliquetas Eurythoe complanata, Marphysa formosa e Diopatra aciculata, procedentes do Canal de São Sebastião (São Sebastião, SP), foram observados em laboratório.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Trophic Ecology of Hydrothermal Vent Fauna Associated with Tubeworm Assemblages on the Juan De Fuca Ridge
    Biogeosciences, 15, 2629–2647, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2629-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Biodiversity and trophic ecology of hydrothermal vent fauna associated with tubeworm assemblages on the Juan de Fuca Ridge Yann Lelièvre1,2, Jozée Sarrazin1, Julien Marticorena1, Gauthier Schaal3, Thomas Day1, Pierre Legendre2, Stéphane Hourdez4,5, and Marjolaine Matabos1 1Ifremer, Centre de Bretagne, REM/EEP, Laboratoire Environnement Profond, 29280 Plouzané, France 2Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada 3Laboratoire des Sciences de l’Environnement Marin (LEMAR), UMR 6539 9 CNRS/UBO/IRD/Ifremer, BP 70, 29280, Plouzané, France 4Sorbonne Université, UMR7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29680 Roscoff, France 5CNRS, UMR7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, 29680 Roscoff, France Correspondence: Yann Lelièvre ([email protected]) Received: 3 October 2017 – Discussion started: 12 October 2017 Revised: 29 March 2018 – Accepted: 7 April 2018 – Published: 4 May 2018 Abstract. Hydrothermal vent sites along the Juan de Fuca community structuring. Vent food webs did not appear to be Ridge in the north-east Pacific host dense populations of organised through predator–prey relationships. For example, Ridgeia piscesae tubeworms that promote habitat hetero- although trophic structure complexity increased with ecolog- geneity and local diversity. A detailed description of the ical successional stages, showing a higher number of preda- biodiversity and community structure is needed to help un- tors in the last stages, the food web structure itself did not derstand the ecological processes that underlie the distribu- change across assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of a New Polychaete, <I>Onuphis Punggolensis</I>
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 63(1): 127–132, 1998 DESCRIPTION OF A NEW POLYCHAETE, ONUPHIS PUNGGOLENSIS (ONUPHIDAE), FROM SINGAPORE Lik Tong Tan and Loke Ming Chou ABSTRACT A new species of onuphid worm, Onuphis punggolensis, from Sungei Punggol, Singapore is described. This is the first record of the genus Onuphis and is the third onuphid species to be documented from Singapore waters. The new species is related to O. eremita Audouin and Milne Edwards and its congeners. The main differences lie in the absence of interramal papillae at the base of dorsal cirri in setigers 4 to 10, pigmentation pattern of the dorsal region, the presence of subdermal spots along the length of the occipital ceratophores, and relatively fewer number of ceratophore rings. The onuphid polychaetes from Singapore waters are poorly studied with only two spe- cies previously recognized to date (Tan and Chou, 1993; Tan and Chou, 1996). These species are Diopatra neapolitana (Della Chiaje, 1841) and D. bulohensis Tan and Chou (1996) reported from Kampong Mata Ikan shore and Sungei Buloh respectively. The former species was recorded from a survey of the literature (Vohra, 1972). Onuphid spe- cies constitute about 3% of the total number of polychaete fauna documented from Singapore (Tan and Chou, 1993). The present paper reports the discovery of a third onuphid species belonging to the genus Onuphis from Singapore waters. This is also the first record of the genus from Singapore. The material on which this study is based was procured from the benthic invertebrate survey conducted at Sungei [= river] Punggol, located on the northeastern coast of Singapore (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Annelida: Dorvilleidae) Associated with the Coral Lophelia Pertusa (Anthozoa: Caryophylliidae)
    ARTICLE A new species of Ophryotrocha (Annelida: Dorvilleidae) associated with the coral Lophelia pertusa (Anthozoa: Caryophylliidae) Vinicius da Rocha Miranda¹²; Andrielle Raposo Rodrigues¹³ & Ana Claudia dos Santos Brasil¹⁴ ¹ Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde (ICBS), Departamento de Biologia Animal, Laboratório de Polychaeta. Seropédica, RJ, Brasil. ² ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-184X. E-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) ³ ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9152-355X. E-mail: [email protected] ⁴ ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0611-9948. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Ophryotrocha is the most speciose genus within Dorvilleidae, with species occurring in a great variety of environments around the globe. In Brazil, records of Ophryotrocha are scarce and no specific identification is provided for any of the records. Herein we describe a new species of Dorvilleidae, Ophryotrocha zitae sp. nov. Adult and larval specimens were found in the axis of a fragment of the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa, sampled off São Paulo’s coast, at a depth of 245 m. Both forms are described and illustrated. This new species resembles O. puerilis, O. adherens and O. eutrophila, but can be distinguished based on differences in its mandible and on chaetae shape and arrangement. Key-Words. Epibiont; Cold-water Coral; Deep-sea; Eunicida, Associated fauna. INTRODUCTION sette glands on the posterior region of the body (Ockelmann & Åkesson, 1990; Heggoy et al., 2007; The Family Dorvilleidae is comprised of 38 val‑ Paxton & Åkesson, 2011). These species also bear id genera, many of which are monospecific (Read, a complex buccal apparatus comprising a pair of 2016) and others, despite more specious, pres‑ mandibles and maxillae, the latter being either ent evident morphological homogeny (Rouse & “P‑type” or “K‑type”, and the presence of one or Pleijel, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Mobbing Strategies of a Fish Population Against a Sessile
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Novel mobbing strategies of a fish population against a sessile annelid predator Received: 10 December 2015 Jose Lachat & Daniel Haag-Wackernagel Accepted: 22 August 2016 When searching for food, foraging fishes expose themselves to hidden predators. The strategies that Published: 12 September 2016 maximize the survival of foraging fishes are not well understood. Here, we describe a novel type of mobbing behaviour displayed by foraging Scolopsis affinis. The fish direct sharp water jets towards the hidden sessile annelid predator Eunice aphroditois (Bobbit worm). We recognized two different behavioural roles for mobbers (i.e., initiator and subsequent participants). The first individual to exhibit behaviour indicating the discovery of the Bobbit directed, absolutely and per time unit, more water jets than the subsequent individuals that joined the mobbing. We found evidence that the mobbing impacted the behaviour of the Bobbit, e.g., by inducing retraction. S. affinis individuals either mob alone or form mobbing groups. We speculate that this behaviour may provide social benefits for its conspecifics by securing foraging territories forS. affinis. Our results reveal a sophisticated and complex behavioural strategy to protect against a hidden predator. Mobbing in the animal kingdom is described as an approach towards a potential predator followed by swoops or runs, sometimes involving a direct attack with physical contact by the mobber1. Mobbing is well characterized in birds, mammals, and even invertebrates1–5. Most of the reported mobbing behaviours initiated by a prey species involve directed harassment of a mobile predator1,3,6–9. Hidden, ambushing predators are a major threat to prey species.
    [Show full text]
  • Tube-Forming Polychaetes Enhance Invertebrate Diversity and Abundance in Sandy Sediments of Mozambique, Africa
    African Journal of Marine Science 2011, 33(2): 327–332 Copyright © NISC (Pty) Ltd Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE ISSN 1814–232X EISSN 1814–2338 doi: 10.2989/1814232X.2011.600433 Short Communication Tube-forming polychaetes enhance invertebrate diversity and abundance in sandy sediments of Mozambique, Africa MS Thomsen1,2*, MF Muth3 and KJ McGlathery3 1 Marine Department, National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, PO Box 4000, Roskilde, Denmark 2 School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009 WA, Australia 3 Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, 291 McCormick Rd, Clark Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received March 2011; accepted May 2011 In marine soft-bottom systems, polychaetes can increase habitat complexity by constructing rigid tubes (e.g. several onuphid species) that contrast with surrounding topographically flat sediments. These structures can provide predation refuges and increase larval settlement and thereby increase the richness and abundance of fauna. We collected invertebrate samples from an intertidal flat with low onuphid tube density (2.7 m–2) in Mozambique and document that more organisms (70 times higher mollusc abundances) and more species (15 times more mollusc species) were found associated with solitary tubes of an onuphid polychaete compared with surrounding sand habitats. These results are in agreement with tube versus sand comparisons from soft-bottom systems in the North Atlantic where polychaete tube densities are often much higher. Keywords: habitat formation, onuphid polychaete, species richness, western Indian Ocean Introduction Species that form or modify habitat, often referred to as (Thomsen et al.
    [Show full text]