In Space, No One Can Hear You Scream ‘Authorship!’

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Space, No One Can Hear You Scream ‘Authorship!’ Hugvísindasvið In Space, No One Can Hear You Scream ‘Authorship!’ The Shift of Authorship in the Alien Franchise from the Producer to the Director to the Star Ritgerð til B.A.-prófs Erlingur Grétar Einarsson Maí 2011 Háskóli Íslands Hugvísindasvið Enskuskor In Space, No One Can Hear You Scream ‘Authorship!’ The Shift of Authorship in the Alien Franchise from the Producer to the Director to the Star Ritgerð til B.A.-prófs Erlingur Grétar Einarsson Kt.: 090482-5569 Leiðbeinandi: Martin Regal Maí 2011 Abstract This thesis discusses the issue of authorship in the Alien film franchise. An attempt is made to dissect how the films are influenced by the producers of the franchise, the directors of each film and the star playing the main role in them. The main issue is how authorship shifts from one agent to another between installments. The first part of the thesis is an analysis of each of the four directors who have directed an Alien film, Ridley Scott, James Cameron, David Fincher and Jean-Pierre Jeunet, and how their specific tendencies formed each Alien film to fit their own directorial vision as much as conforming their installment to a genre or a previous entry. All four directors had considerable influence on both the style and story of their respective films, but while the first two, Scott and Cameron, are considered “authors” of their respective installments, the second two are not. The reasons for that are argued in the second and third part. The second part of the thesis discusses Sigourney Weaver and her stardom, which plays an important part in the shifting authorship of the Alien franchise. Her career and the evolution of her celebrity over the 18 years between the first Alien installment and the last is discussed and analyzed. She evolved from being a newcomer to a prominent film star while regularly returning to the same character. The third part discusses the perception and reception of each Alien installment by analyzing reviews and promotional material for the films. This approach brings the shift of authorship over the Alien films from the producers to the directors to the star into clear light. Index Introduction 1 Film franchises and directorial authorship in the Alien franchise 5 Ridley Scott and Alien 6 James Cameron and Aliens 10 David Fincher and Alien 3 15 Jean-Pierre Jeunet and Alien: Resurrection 18 Sigourney Weaver‘s stardom 22 The perception of authorship 29 The perception of authorship in Alien 29 The perception of authorship in Aliens 32 The perception of authorship in Alien 3 34 The perception of authorship in Alien: Resurrection 36 Conclusion 38 References 40 Introduction [Sigourney:] „Fincher was obviously very young but keen to tackle that enormous responsibility. The directors have always been the stars of each movie really. And until we found the right genius, the Alien 3 project never felt set. Only when Fincher appeared did we feel we were in good hands. The first words out of his mouth were ´Shave Ripley„s head´! I knew instantly he wasn„t going to be a quiet and undaring director. (Jones, 16) But the show quite rightly belongs to Sigourney Weaver, and her shaven headed presence – arrived at due to the prevalence of space lice – ensures that the quality of the film is never in question, and interest in it is always high. (Brett, 26) Who is the real and definitive author of any modern film? The authorship of film has been a complex subject both inside and outside the academy for decades. Auteur theory, genre theory and star studies all offer a distinct viewpoint on the subject of what really controls the ultimate result of any film production. But a definitive answer to this question has never been found, for even the meaning of the word “auteur” has never been fully defined or explained. When it comes to modern American filmmaking, the issue becomes trickier still. Directors, producers, stars, even cinematographers, editors or composers, can lay claim to authorship over the final result of almost any film, and academics, professional film critics and journalists, as well as the every-day viewer, every one of them interested in determining the “real” author of the film they just saw, 1 can, have and will easily become lost in the labyrinth of authorship in modern Hollywood. The two opening quotes are taken from the same issue of Film Review, the monthly British film magazine. The first is from Alan Jones‟s interview with Sigourney Weaver, the main actress of the then newly released Alien 3 (1992), directed by David Fincher. The second is taken from Anwar Brett‟s review of the same film. In these two quotes there is an obvious clash in the reading of one of the most talked-about elements of that film - the shaved head of Ellen Ripley, the main character in the Alien film franchise. Weaver herself attributes this decision to the director, while the reviewer, only ten pages later in the very same issue, gives Weaver all the credit for her “shaven headed presence”. Why – and how – does this come about? Why is the power of authorship attributed to the main actress instead of the director, a man who has been called an “auteur” by film scholars, or even the producers of this successful science- fiction franchise? The Alien film franchise is a perfect example of how authorship is not only read in different ways, but also how it shifts from one agent of authorship to another through several installments. The first film about Ellen Ripley and her encounters with the now famous, near- unstoppable “xenomorph” that wreaks havoc on Ripley„s spaceship, Alien, came out in 1979. It made its mark on film history, not least in regards to special effects, suspense and its modern blend of horror and science fiction, but more still in regards to characters that had a profound impact on its audience. The success of Alien, both commercial and critical, resulted in the eventual production of three direct sequels, Aliens (1986), Alien 3 and Alien: Resurrection (1997), as well as two spin-off films combining the world of Alien with the world of Predator, a 1987 action film, another successful blend of the 2 monster horror and science fiction genres, AVP: Alien vs. Predator (2004), and AVPR: Aliens vs. Predator – Requiem (2007). In addition, a prequel, tentatively titled Prometheus, is currently in production under the direction of Ridley Scott, the director of the first Alien film. The first four films have achieved status as one the most popular and respected Hollywood film franchises of the last few decades, and in this essay they will be referred to as the Alien franchise or Alien series. All four films revolve around the same central character, Ellen Ripley, played by actress Sigourney Weaver, and her repeated encounters with members of the same predatory, hostile and deadly alien race, as well as her conflict with other humans who want to capture the xenomorph for either financial or military benefits. Despite these semantic similarities between the films, they are all easily discernible from each other; the main reason for this is that each film was made by a different director; Alien was directed by Ridley Scott, Aliens was directed (and written) by James Cameron and the third film, Alien 3, was directed by David Fincher, while the fourth film, Alien: Resurrection, was directed by Jean-Pierre Jeunet. What is most remarkable about this line-up of directors is that today each and every one of them is considered among the most respected filmmakers in the world and all of them have enjoyed that status for a number of decades. Their films are easily identifiable, both in regards to narrative and visual style as well as ideology. All of them have been regarded as auteurs at various points in their career, be it by academic writers, critics or their audience. These directors‟ participation in the installments of entries in a film franchise creates a unique combination of auteur filmmaking and genre films as parts of a Hollywood studio franchise. 3 In addition to this combination of genre film and auteur film in the Alien franchise, there is a third important element: Sigourney Weaver, the star. Over the course of the 18 years in which the four Alien films were conceived, Sigourney Weaver developed from being a newcomer to being a physical actress and later a critical favorite demanding top-billing in her films, before achieving a permanent status as a seminal star in Hollywood. Through that process she in turn gains certain level of authorship over her work, be it through the perception of those who see it or in her direct influence on its production. What makes the Alien franchise so interesting in an academic context is exactly this; the development from genre film to auteur film to star vehicle over the course of its four installments. The most sufficient way to address this development is by setting a baseline; what does the ordinary film franchise installment in Hollywood look like? 4 Film franchises and directorial authorship in the Alien franchise Hollywood is the birthplace of an immense amount of film franchises, tracing back to as early as the second decade of the 20th century. The vast majority of these franchises is most easily defined and recognizable by each one‟s internal homogeneity. The most obvious example is the James Bond franchise. Currently the Bond canon consists of twenty-two official, Broccoli-produced films, with the twenty-third in active production. The first film, Dr. No, released in 1962, is not only nearly semantically, but also ideologically identical to the sixteenth one, License to Kill, released in 1989.
Recommended publications
  • The Retriever, Issue 1, Volume 39
    18 Features August 31, 2004 THE RETRIEVER Alien vs. Predator: as usual, humans screwed it up Courtesy of 20th Century Fox DOUGLAS MILLER After some groundbreaking discoveries on Retriever Weekly Editorial Staff the part of the humans, three Predators show up and it is revealed that the temple functions as prov- Many of the staple genre franchises that chil- ing ground for young Predator warriors. As the dren of the 1980’s grew up with like Nightmare on first alien warriors are born, chaos ensues – with Elm street or Halloween are now over twenty years Weyland’s team stuck right in the middle. Of old and are beginning to loose appeal, both with course, lots of people and monsters die. their original audience and the next generation of Observant fans will notice that Anderson’s filmgoers. One technique Hollywood has been story is very similar his own Resident Evil, but it exploiting recently to breath life into dying fran- works much better here. His premise is actually chises is to combine the keystone character from sort of interesting – especially ideas like Predator one’s with another’s – usually ending up with a involvement in our own development. Anderson “versus” film. Freddy vs. Jason was the first, and tries to allow his story to unfold and build in the now we have Alien vs. Predator, which certainly style of Alien, withholding the monsters almost will not be the last. Already, the studios have toyed altogether until the second half of the film. This around with making Superman vs. Batman, does not exactly work.
    [Show full text]
  • Jun 18 Customer Order Form
    #369 | JUN19 PREVIEWS world.com Name: ORDERS DUE JUN 18 THE COMIC SHOP’S CATALOG PREVIEWSPREVIEWS CUSTOMER ORDER FORM Jun19 Cover ROF and COF.indd 1 5/9/2019 3:08:57 PM June19 Humanoids Ad.indd 1 5/9/2019 3:15:02 PM SPAWN #300 MARVEL ACTION: IMAGE COMICS CAPTAIN MARVEL #1 IDW PUBLISHING BATMAN/SUPERMAN #1 DC COMICS COFFIN BOUND #1 GLOW VERSUS IMAGE COMICS THE STAR PRIMAS TP IDW PUBLISHING BATMAN VS. RA’S AL GHUL #1 DC COMICS BERSERKER UNBOUND #1 DARK HORSE COMICS THE DEATH-DEFYING DEVIL #1 DYNAMITE ENTERTAINMENT MARVEL COMICS #1000 MARVEL COMICS HELLBOY AND THE B.P.R.D.: SATURN RETURNS #1 ONCE & FUTURE #1 DARK HORSE COMICS BOOM! STUDIOS Jun19 Gem Page.indd 1 5/9/2019 3:24:56 PM FEATURED ITEMS COMIC BOOKS & GRAPHIC NOVELS Bad Reception #1 l AFTERSHOCK COMICS The Flash: Crossover Crisis Book 1: Green Arrow’s Perfect Shot HC l AMULET BOOKS Archie: The Married Life 10 Years Later #1 l ARCHIE COMICS Warrior Nun: Dora #1 l AVATAR PRESS INC Star Wars: Rey and Pals HC l CHRONICLE BOOKS 1 Lady Death Masterpieces: The Art of Lady Death HC l COFFIN COMICS 1 Oswald the Lucky Rabbit: The Search for the Lost Disney Cartoons l DISNEY EDITIONS Moomin: The Lars Jansson Edition Deluxe Slipcase l DRAWN & QUARTERLY The Poe Clan Volume 1 HC l FANTAGRAPHICS BOOKS Cycle of the Werewolf SC l GALLERY 13 Ranx HC l HEAVY METAL MAGAZINE Superman and Wonder Woman With Collectibles HC l HERO COLLECTOR Omni #1 l HUMANOIDS The Black Mage GN l ONI PRESS The Rot Volume 1 TP l SOURCE POINT PRESS Snowpiercer Hc Vol 04 Extinction l TITAN COMICS Lenore #1 l TITAN COMICS Disney’s The Lion King: The Official Movie Special l TITAN COMICS The Art and Making of The Expance HC l TITAN BOOKS Doctor Mirage #1 l VALIANT ENTERTAINMENT The Mall #1 l VAULT COMICS MANGA 2 2 World’s End Harem: Fantasia Volume 1 GN l GHOST SHIP My Hero Academia Smash! Volume 1 GN l VIZ MEDIA Kingdom Hearts: Re:Coded SC l YEN ON Overlord a la Carte Volume 1 GN l YEN PRESS Arifureta: Commonplace to the World’s Strongest Zero Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Malady: Film & the Question of the Uncanny Human-Animal
    etropic 10(2011): Creed, Tropical Malady | 131 Tropical Malady: Film & the Question of the Uncanny Human-Animal “The tiger trails you like a shadow/ his spirit is starving and lonesome/I see you are his prey and his companion” – Tropical Malady. Barbara Creed University of Melbourne Abstract The acclaimed Thai film, Tropical Malady (2004), represents the tropics as a surreal place where conscious and unconscious are as inextricably entwined. Directed by Apichatpong Weerasethakul, Tropical Malady presents two interconnected stories: one a quirky gay love story; the other a strange disconnected narrative about a shape-shifting shaman, a man-beast and a ghostly tiger. This paper will argue that from it beginnings in the silent period, the cinema has created an uncanny zone of tropicality where human and animal merge. rom its beginnings in the early twentieth century the cinema has expressed an F enduring fascination with the tropics as an imaginary space. While many filmmakers have envisaged the tropics as an unspoiled paradise (Bird of Paradise, 1932, 1951; The Moon of Manakoora, 1943; South Pacific, 1958), a view which has its origins in classical times, others have represented the tropics as a deeply uncanny zone where familiar and unfamiliar coalesce. It is as if the heat and intensity of the tropics has liquefied matter until normally incommensurate forms are able to dissolve almost imperceptibly into each other. In this process the boundaries between different systems of thought, ideas and ethics similarly dissipate, creating a space for new and often subversive ideas to flourish. As Driver and Martins state, the meaning of “tropicality” is so elastic a number of discourses have been able to shape it to suit their own purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • When the Pot Plays Potter: •Œisaiahâ•Š, Toy Story And
    Journal of Religion & Film Volume 14 Issue 2 October 2010 Article 10 October 2010 When the Pot Plays Potter: “Isaiah”, Toy Story and Religious Socialization Paul Tremblay Long Island University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf Recommended Citation Tremblay, Paul (2010) "When the Pot Plays Potter: “Isaiah”, Toy Story and Religious Socialization," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 14 : Iss. 2 , Article 10. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol14/iss2/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. When the Pot Plays Potter: “Isaiah”, Toy Story and Religious Socialization Abstract Biblical verses mentioning the “pot and the potter” entail a God/creation relationship in which the creation is warned not to turn against, or even criticize, the Creator; humankind is advised humility for fear of Yahweh’s punishment. This is a comparative study of three films with a strong emphasis on a children’s film, Toy Story (1995); the movies to be examined are treated as allegories of the concept of potter/pot lesson with a twist as the humans are playing God/potter. The movies geared more to an adult or mature audience (The Matrix [1999] and Terminator [1986]) feature the creation (robots) turned against the creator (humankind) with deadly consequences for humans. In Toy Story, an animated film, the creators (humans) are not threatened and the “pots” even agree to their condition.The film, I suggest, is an excellent example of the process of religious socialization as played out in a modern fairy tale.
    [Show full text]
  • Tv Pg 5 04-04.Indd
    The Goodland Star-News / Friday, April 4, 2008 5 Like puzzles? Then you’ll love sudoku. This mind-bending puzzle FUN BY THE NUM B ERS will have you hooked from the moment you square off, so sharpen your pencil and put your sudoku savvy to the test! Here’s How It Works: Sudoku puzzles are formatted as a 9x9 grid, broken down into nine 3x3 boxes. To solve a sudoku, the numbers 1 through 9 must fill each row, column and box. Each number can appear only once in each row, column and box. You can figure out the order in which the numbers will appear by using the numeric clues already provided in the boxes. The more numbers you name, the easier it gets to solve the puzzle! ANSWER TO TUESD A Y ’S SATURDAY EVENING APRIL 5, 2008 SUNDAY EVENING APRIL 6, 2008 6PM 6:30 7PM 7:30 8PM 8:30 9PM 9:30 10PM 10:30 6PM 6:30 7PM 7:30 8PM 8:30 9PM 9:30 10PM 10:30 ES E = Eagle Cable S = S&T Telephone ES E = Eagle Cable S = S&T Telephone The First 48: Stray Bullet; The First 48 Body rolled in The Sopranos (TVMA) (:18) The First 48 (TVPG) (:18) The First 48: Stray Bul- “The Godfather” (‘72, Drama) A decorated veteran takes over control of his family’s criminal empire from “The Godfather” (‘72) Ma- 36 47 A&E 36 47 A&E his ailing father as new threats and old enemies conspire to destroy them. (R) fia family life.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminsterresearch the Artist Biopic
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch The artist biopic: a historical analysis of narrative cinema, 1934- 2010 Bovey, D. This is an electronic version of a PhD thesis awarded by the University of Westminster. © Mr David Bovey, 2015. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] 1 THE ARTIST BIOPIC: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF NARRATIVE CINEMA, 1934-2010 DAVID ALLAN BOVEY A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Westminster for the degree of Master of Philosophy December 2015 2 ABSTRACT The thesis provides an historical overview of the artist biopic that has emerged as a distinct sub-genre of the biopic as a whole, totalling some ninety films from Europe and America alone since the first talking artist biopic in 1934. Their making usually reflects a determination on the part of the director or star to see the artist as an alter-ego. Many of them were adaptations of successful literary works, which tempted financial backers by having a ready-made audience based on a pre-established reputation. The sub-genre’s development is explored via the grouping of films with associated themes and the use of case studies.
    [Show full text]
  • WITH OUR DEMONS a Thesis Submitted By
    1 MONSTROSITIES MADE IN THE INTERFACE: THE IDEOLOGICAL RAMIFICATIONS OF ‘PLAYING’ WITH OUR DEMONS A Thesis submitted by Jesse J Warren, BLM Student ID: u1060927 For the award of Master of Arts (Humanities and Communication) 2020 Thesis Certification Page This thesis is entirely the work of Jesse Warren except where otherwise acknowledged. This work is original and has not previously been submitted for any other award, except where acknowledged. Signed by the candidate: __________________________________________________________________ Principal Supervisor: _________________________________________________________________ Abstract Using procedural rhetoric to critique the role of the monster in survival horror video games, this dissertation will discuss the potential for such monsters to embody ideological antagonism in the ‘game’ world which is symptomatic of the desire to simulate the ideological antagonism existing in the ‘real’ world. Survival video games explore ideology by offering a space in which to fantasise about society's fears and desires in which the sum of all fears and object of greatest desire (the monster) is so terrifying as it embodies everything 'other' than acceptable, enculturated social and political behaviour. Video games rely on ideology to create believable game worlds as well as simulate believable behaviours, and in the case of survival horror video games, to simulate fear. This dissertation will critique how the games Alien:Isolation, Until Dawn, and The Walking Dead Season 1 construct and themselves critique representations of the ‘real’ world, specifically the way these games position the player to see the monster as an embodiment of everything wrong and evil in life - everything 'other' than an ideal, peaceful existence, and challenge the player to recognise that the very actions required to combat or survive this force potentially serve as both extensions of existing cultural ideology and harbingers of ideological resistance across two worlds – the ‘real’ and the ‘game’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Terminator by John Wills
    The Terminator By John Wills “The Terminator” is a cult time-travel story pitting hu- mans against machines. Authored and directed by James Cameron, the movie features Arnold Schwarzenegger, Linda Hamilton and Michael Biehn in leading roles. It launched Cameron as a major film di- rector, and, along with “Conan the Barbarian” (1982), established Schwarzenegger as a box office star. James Cameron directed his first movie “Xenogenesis” in 1978. A 12-minute long, $20,000 picture, “Xenogenesis” depicted a young man and woman trapped in a spaceship dominated by power- ful and hostile robots. It introduced what would be- come enduring Cameron themes: space exploration, machine sentience and epic scale. In the early 1980s, Cameron worked with Roger Corman on a number of film projects, assisting with special effects and the design of sets, before directing “Piranha II” (1981) as his debut feature. Cameron then turned to writing a science fiction movie script based around a cyborg from 2029AD travelling through time to con- Artwork from the cover of the film’s DVD release by MGM temporary Los Angeles to kill a waitress whose as Home Entertainment. The Library of Congress Collection. yet unborn son is destined to lead a resistance movement against a future cyborg army. With the input of friend Bill Wisher along with producer Gale weeks. However, critical reception hinted at longer- Anne Hurd (Hurd and Cameron had both worked for lasting appeal. “Variety” enthused over the picture: Roger Corman), Cameron finished a draft script in “a blazing, cinematic comic book, full of virtuoso May 1982. After some trouble finding industry back- moviemaking, terrific momentum, solid performances ers, Orion agreed to distribute the picture with and a compelling story.” Janet Maslin for the “New Hemdale Pictures financing it.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORTS of the TIBOR T. POLGAR FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM, 2013 David J. Yozzo, Sarah H. Fernald and Helena Andreyko Editors a Joint
    REPORTS OF THE TIBOR T. POLGAR FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM, 2013 David J. Yozzo, Sarah H. Fernald and Helena Andreyko Editors A Joint Program of The Hudson River Foundation and The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation December 2015 ABSTRACT Eight studies were conducted within the Hudson River Estuary under the auspices of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program during 2013. Major objectives of these studies included: (1) reconstruction of past climate events through analysis of sedimentary microfossils, (2) determining past and future ability of New York City salt marshes to accommodate sea level rise through vertical accretion, (3) analysis of the effects of nutrient pollution on greenhouse gas production in Hudson River marshes, (4) detection and identification of pathogens in aerosols and surface waters of Newtown Creek, (5) detection of amphetamine type stimulants at wastewater outflow sites in the Hudson River, (6) investigating establishment limitations of new populations of Oriental bittersweet in Schodack Island State Park, (7) assessing macroinvertebrate tolerance to hypoxia in the presence of water chestnut and submerged aquatic species, and (8) examining the distribution and feeding ecology of larval sea lamprey in the Hudson River basin. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................... iii Preface ................................................................................................................. vii Fellowship Reports Pelagic Tropical to Subtropical Foraminifera in the Hudson River: What is their Source? Kyle M. Monahan and Dallas Abbott .................................................................. I-1 Sea Level Rise and Sediment: Recent Salt Marsh Accretion in the Hudson River Estuary Troy D. Hill and Shimon C. Anisfeld .................................................................. II-1 Nutrient Pollution in Hudson River Marshes: Effects on Greenhouse Gas Production Angel Montero, Brian Brigham, and Gregory D.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAINING the HUDSON the Fight for the River in the American Revolution
    CHAINING THE HUDSON The fight for the river in the American Revolution COLN DI Chaining the Hudson Relic of the Great Chain, 1863. Look back into History & you 11 find the Newe improvers in the art of War has allways had the advantage of their Enemys. —Captain Daniel Joy to the Pennsylvania Committee of Safety, January 16, 1776 Preserve the Materials necessary to a particular and clear History of the American Revolution. They will yield uncommon Entertainment to the inquisitive and curious, and at the same time afford the most useful! and important Lessons not only to our own posterity, but to all succeeding Generations. Governor John Hancock to the Massachusetts House of Representatives, September 28, 1781. Chaining the Hudson The Fight for the River in the American Revolution LINCOLN DIAMANT Fordham University Press New York Copyright © 2004 Fordham University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored ii retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other—except for brief quotation: printed reviews, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN 0-8232-2339-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Diamant, Lincoln. Chaining the Hudson : the fight for the river in the American Revolution / Lincoln Diamant.—Fordham University Press ed. p. cm. Originally published: New York : Carol Pub. Group, 1994. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8232-2339-6 (pbk.) 1. New York (State)—History—Revolution, 1775-1783—Campaigns. 2. United States—History—Revolution, 1775-1783—Campaigns. 3. Hudson River Valley (N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief for Petitioners
    No. 20-315 In the Supreme Court of the United States JOSE SANTOS SANCHEZ AND SONIA GONZALEZ, PETITIONERS, v. ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS LISA S. BLATT JAIME W. APARISI AMY MASON SAHARIA Counsel of Record A. JOSHUA PODOLL YUSUF R. AHMAD MICHAEL J. MESTITZ DANIELA RAAYMAKERS ALEXANDER GAZIKAS APARISI LAW DANIELLE J. SOCHACZEVSKI 819 Silver Spring Avenue WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP Silver Spring, MD 20910 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. (301) 562-1416 Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] (202) 434-5000 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(f)(4), a grant of Temporary Protected Status authorizes eligible nonciti- zens to obtain lawful-permanent-resident status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255. (I) II PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS Petitioners are Jose Santos Sanchez and Sonia Gon- zalez. Respondents are Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secre- tary, United States Department of Homeland Security; Director, United States Citizenship & Immigration Ser- vices; Director, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services Nebraska Service Center; and District Director, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services New- ark. III TABLE OF CONTENTS Page OPINIONS BELOW ........................................................... 1 JURISDICTION ................................................................. 2 STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED ..................... 2 STATEMENT .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From Jeunet's Alien: Resurrection
    ACTA UNIV. SAPIENTIAE, FILM AND MEDIA STUDIES, 8 (2014) 149–166 DOI: 10.2478/ausfm-2014-0031 Embodied Genetics in Science-Fiction, Big-Budget to Low-Budget: from Jeunet’s Alien: Resurrection (1997) to Piccinini’s Workshop (2011) Andrea Virginás Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The article uses and revises to some extent Vivian Sobchack’s categorization of (basically) American science-l ction output as “optimistic big-budget,” “wondrous middle-ground” and “pessimistic low-budget” seen as such in relation to what Sobchack calls the “double view” of alien beings in l lmic diegesis (Screening Space, 2001). The argument is advanced that based on how diegetic encounters are constructed between “genetically classical” human agents and beings only partially “genetically classical” and/or human (due to genetic diseases, mutations, splicing, and cloning), we may differentiate between various methods of visualization (nicknamed “the museum,” “the lookalike,” and “incest”) that are correlated to Sobchack’s mentioned categories, while also displaying changes in tone. Possibilities of revision appear thanks to the later timeframe (the late 1990s/2000s) and the different national-canonical belongings (American, Icelandic-German- Danish, Hungarian-German, Canadian-French-American, and Australian) that characterize l lmic and artistic examples chosen for analysis as compared to Sobchack’s work in Screening Space.1 Keywords: science-l ction, genetic mutations, aliens, Vivian Sobchack. Hero(ines) Facing Genetic Aliens In her exceptional monograph about modern American science-l ction cinema, Screening Space (2001), Vivian Sobchack writes in detail about “the alien’s perspective,” the creature that not only is different from us, but, as a matter of fact, cannot be conceived of from the standpoint we, humans, occupy, neither 1 This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Education, CNCS – UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-RU-PD-2012-3 – 0199.
    [Show full text]