DOCSLIB.ORG

Ssc-384 Post-Yield Strength of Icebreaking Ship

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ssc-384 Post-Yield Strength of Icebreaking Ship NTIS#PB96-109129 SSC-384 POST-YIELD STRENGTH OF ICEBREAKING SHIP STRUCTURAL MEMBERS This dmment has ken approved for publicreleaseandsslq its dislributicmis unlimited SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE 1995 c–/ U(P STRUCTURECOMMilT& The SHIP STRUCTURE COMMl~EE is constituted to prosecute a research program to improve the hull structures of ships and other marine structures by an extension of knowledge pertaining to design, materials, and methods of construction. RADM J. C. Card, USCG (Chairman) Chief, Ofice of Marine Safety, Security and Environmental Protection U, S. Coast Guard Mr. Thomas H. Peirce Mr. Edwin B. Schimler Dr. Donald Liu Marine Research and Development Associate Administrator for Ship– Senior Vice President Coordinator building and Technology Development American Bureau of Shipping Transportation Development Center Maritime Administration Transpofl Canada Mr, Robert McCarthy Mr. Thomas Connors Dr. Ross Grahm Director, Survivability and Structural Acting Director of Engineering (N7) Head, Hydronautics Section Integrity Group (SEA 03P) Military Sealift Command Defence Research Establishment–Atlantic Naval Sea Systems Command EXECUTIVE DIRFC_~Q~ CONTRA CTING OFFICER TFCH NKAL~ lIYE CDR Stephen E. Sharpe, USCG Mr. VWliam J. Siekierka U. S. Coast Guard Naval Sea Systems Command SHIP STRUCTUR ESUBCOMMllTEE The SHIP STRUCTURE SUBCOMMllTEE acts for the Ship Structure Committee on technical matters by providing technical coordination for determinating the goals and objectives of the program and by evaluating and interpreting the results in terms of structural design, construction, and operation, MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAN.Q MARITIME ADMINISTRATION jJ_S. COAST GUARD Mr. Robert E. Van Jones (Chairman) Mr. Frederick Seibold CAPT George Wright Mr, Rickard A. Anderson Mr. Richard P. Voelker Mr. Walter Lincoln Mr. Michael W. Touma Mr. Chao l-f, Lin Mr. Rubin Sheinberg Mr, Jeffrey E, Beach Dr, Walter M. Maciean AMERICAN_iUIR.EAU OF SHIPPING NAVAL S= SYSTEMS COMMAND TRANSPORT CANADA Mr, Glenn Ashe Mr, W, Thomas Packard Mr. John Grinstead Mr. John F. ConIon Mr. Charles L Null Mr, Ian Bayly Mr. Phillip G. Rynn Mr. Edward Kadala Mr, David L. Stocks Mr, William Hanzelek Mr. Allen H. Engle Mr. Peter Timonin DEFENCE RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT ATLANTIC &%~~~%n Gibson Dr. Roger Hollirrgshead Mr. John Porter ~HIP STRUCTURE SUBCOMMllTEE LIAISON MEMBERS ~OCIETYOF NAVAL ARCHITECTS AND NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES - MARINE ENGINEERS MARINE BOARD Dr. William Sandberg Dr. Robert Sielski CANADA CENTRE FOR MINERALS AND NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES - FNERGY T ECMt@LOG IES COMMITTFF ON MARINE STRUC TIJ&ES Dr. William R, Tyson Dr. John Landes U. S, NAVAI A ~A12HyfY WELDING RF SF~NH COUNCII Dr. Ramswar Bhattacharyya Dr. Martin Prager ~, S, MERCHANT MARIN.U~ADEMY AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL lNSTITU_E Dr. C, B. Kim Mr. Alexander D. Wilson U. S. COAST G UABC!_A@AD_EMY ~L RESEARCH LCDR Bruce R. Mustain Dr. Yapa D, S. RaJapaske L1._S.._TECHNlCAL ADIVSORY GROUP TOJJ-IE f@&.$ACHUSETTS INSTITUTF OF TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ORGANIZATION CAPT Charles Piersall CAPT Alan J, Brown STUDENT MEMBER Mr. Jason Miller Massachusetts Institute of Technology ‘“” c- 2-- MemberAgencies: AddressCorrespondenceto: American Bureau of Shipping ExecutiveDirector De fence Rweatch Es&blishment Atlantic Ship StructureCommittee Ma@ime Administration Ship U.S.Coast Guard (G-MMS/SSC) Milit SeaYM Command 2100 Second Street, S.W. Naval Sea7 ystems Command Washin ton, D.C.20593-0001 Transport Canada Structure Ph:(202? 267-OCKEI United States Coast Guard Committee F%;(202)267-4816 An Interagency Adviso~ Committee SSC-384 SR-1380 23 October, 1995 POST-YIELD STRENGTH OF ICEBREAKING SHIP STRUCTURAL MEMBERS In this project an icebreaker hul 1, as modified to meet the requirements of the proposed Canadian Arctic Ship Pollution Prevention Regulations (ASPPR), was modeled. The model was then given a load which was extreme enough to cause some minor plastic deformations of the degree which would be allowed under ASPPR. Through analysis it was determined that the load at which main frame buckling would occur was less than that which had been anticipated. This was interpreted to be due to the progressive yielding of the surrounding structure. Through this and other work the ASPPR will be reviewed for adequacy. This study will also be used to determine how global effects can be applied to local area models of ship structures to avoid the need to model the entire vessel structure. This project was funded by the Canadian Transportation Development Centre and given to the Ship Structure Committe= to allow a wider distribution of the results. C. CARD Rear Admi 2’al, U.S. Coast Guard Chairman, Ship Structure Committee i PUBLICATION DATA FORIM 1. l_ranscart Canada Publication Na. 2. ?rojec: r.h 3. PWC:mcmr’s Catalcgue No. TP11837E 7720 4. Title and SubtitlR ~ SSC-384 I 5. Publkation Da~* Post-yield Buckling of Icebretig Ship Structural lMembers 6. ?ertormmg Organization Dwumnnt No. ~ TR-94-02 7, Author(s) I ~. Transport Canada File No. C.G. DesRochers, E.J. Crocker, R. Kumar, D.P, Br~, B. Dick and S. Lantos , 1460-310 ~, ?ertormmg Orgamzarlon Name and Admss 10. 0SS HIe N~, Manec Limited XSD90-00268-(673) 1888 Bnmswick Street I Suite 400 :1. 0SS w ~ransm Canada Comracr NO. Halifax, NS B3J 3J8 T8200-O-0561/01 -XSD 12. Swnsorlng Agency blame andAddress Transport DeveIopmemCentre (TDC) 13. Type d Publlcarlon and Peri~ c~vg~~ Guy Faureau Complex ‘ ‘ zoo Rene Levesque BIvd. West West Tower, Suite 601 Montreal, Quebec H2Z IX4 * :S. Suoplementan{ NaIes (Fundinq prqrams, titles of raiawd publicatl~s. erc. ) cw~nsored W tie National Energy Board. Direction from a proj~t cotitiee consisttig of representativesfrom TDC, COUI Gu~d (Co~~ Gtid Northern, Ship Safety and Fleet Systems), Canadia Navy DefenseResearehEstablishmentAtlan@ md he projec~team. T6. Abstract The proposed ASPPR regulations allow a terrain amount of plastic deformation of the strucrure under exmemeice loads. The buckling criteria employed in the regulations has facrors to take into account some of the nonlinear effects associated with exceeding he linear range of material propertiw This project is an expioratoty inves~igationinto the post-yield behaviour of icebre&g vessels with tie underlyingobjectiveto determinewhether or no~the reguiruiom are adequatein regards to buckling. The project consisn of modelling two areas of the NIVArctic under a ASPPR calculatedice load of total magnitude F=. The main frames were redesignedlocally to cmform to the proposedASPPR regulations. ArIanalysiswas performed using the finite element program ADI.NAand consisted of a nonlinear stadc analysis using tie are-length metiod (Ioaddispiacement conrroI). Plasticity was found to initiae in the main frames at a load of about .7F=. Bucklingwas found to occur in the main frames at a load level of approximately 1.2*F-. The load required to cause buckLingcalculatedusing linear assump~iomwas siguifieantly higher indicating a substantialdegradationof buckling strength associatedwith the progression of yielding through the sn-ucrure. The structure was found to be capable of canyirtg further load through membrane smngth in the plating. The analysis accounts for global ship dfeets in the local area by modellingthe entire MV Arctic using the program MAESTRO. Conclusion were drawn m to how the gloimleffects can be includedin tie local mode without the requiremen~of modellingthe entire ship. 17. Key UVords 1a. Distrik[jan S tat-ant Post-Yield Buckling, k.ebreaking Ship Structures, Distribution is unlimited; available from: Nonlinear Pmdysis, ASPPR, MV hetic, MaiKIl%amq National Technical Information Service Imperfections, Arc-Length ,Method U. S. Dept of Commerce s P rifi- E“$i;~d +a ------------ 19. Security Clas$ificatian (of this publication) 20. %5urlty Classlftcation (of This page) Z1. ~d~ksslficatlon 22. No. af 23. Price Unclassified Pages UllC~assified 9QL $36.50paP r I Luu TDC!CZT 79+305 1- ...-.... 3 Canadi lhltedstak DqsmmntofcoImmsca Nlsr ::Rl%E5Lm39Nallonalhsthrlo01.RandatdsandTmhnolcqy METRICCONVERSIONCARD Approxima[eConversionsto MerncMeasures ApproximateConve~ionsfi-omMetricMeasures ~~ Symbol Whn Yoit KI;OW kfi~ltiply by To Find Syr)lboi g ~ Symboi When Y014Know Mi4ifiply by To Find Symbol LENGTi H m —_ LENGTH in inches 2.5 centimeter cm ~ mm millimeter 004 inches in f! feet 30 centime[em cm — cm centimeter 0.4 inches in yd yards 0.9 meters A— ,m meters 3.3 feet ft mi miles 1.6 kilometers h-= m meters yards yd AREA km kilometers ;;: miles mi in 2 square inches 6.5 SquarEcentimeters cm z — AREA f[2 square fmt 0.09 square meters m z ~ cmz square centimeters 0.! 6 square inches ~2 ~dz squaw yards 0.8 square meters rn2 — rn2 square meters 1.2 square yards ~dz ~i 2 square miles 2.6 square kilometers kml N ~ ; km 1 square kilometers 0.4 square miles mi 2 acres 0.4 hectares ha ~ ha hectare 2.5 acres MASS (wei*t) (10,OCQm2) Oz ounces 28 MASS (weight) lb pounds 0,45 E&s :g ~ g glarns 0.035 ounces Oz short tons 0,9 metricton t— kg kilogmms 2.2 pounds lb (2000 lb) u~ t metric ton 1J short tons VOLUME (1,000 kg) tsp teaspoons 5 milliliters mL VOLUME ~;p tabl&poons 15 milliliters mL— rrt milliliters 0.03 fluid ounces fl Oz cubic inches 16 millilhers mL ~ mL milliliters 0.06 cubic inches in3 fl 02 fluid ounces 30 milliliters mL —~ L lhers 2,1 pints pt c cups 0.24 lilers L ~’== L titers 1.06 quarts qt pt pints 0.47 Ii[em L- L liters 0.26 gallons :? qt quarts 0.95 liters L~ rn3 cubic metets 35 cubic feet ~al rn3 ~d3 gallons 3.8 liters L= cubic meters 1,3 cubic yards . ft3 cubic feet 0.03 cubic meters rn3 — TEMPERATURE (exact) @3 cubic yards 0.76 cubic meters m3 ‘c degrees multiply by 9/5, degrees ‘F TEMPERATURE (exact) m~ Celsius add 32 Fahrenheit ‘F degrees subtrac[ 32, degrees ‘C ~ Fahrenheit multiply by 5i9 Celsius =A -4(I -20 0 20 37 60 80 100 E* “c 1 t I 1 I .F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~A 40 0 32 80 98.6 T60 212 em water freezes bdy temperature water boils TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2019 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2019 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland and colleagues 12 December 2019 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 314 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2019 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, through the Bering Strait, from or to the Bering Sea of the Pacific Ocean. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the central or northern coast of west Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (transits 149 and 167).
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004
    Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004 Institute of the North • U.S. Arctic Research Commission • International Arctic Science Committee Arctic Ocean Marine Routes This map is a general portrayal of the major Arctic marine routes shown from the perspective of Bering Strait looking northward. The official Northern Sea Route encompasses all routes across the Russian Arctic coastal seas from Kara Gate (at the southern tip of Novaya Zemlya) to Bering Strait. The Northwest Passage is the name given to the marine routes between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans along the northern coast of North America that span the straits and sounds of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Three historic polar voyages in the Central Arctic Ocean are indicated: the first surface shop voyage to the North Pole by the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Arktika in August 1977; the tourist voyage of the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Sovetsky Soyuz across the Arctic Ocean in August 1991; and, the historic scientific (Arctic) transect by the polar icebreakers Polar Sea (U.S.) and Louis S. St-Laurent (Canada) during July and August 1994. Shown is the ice edge for 16 September 2004 (near the minimum extent of Arctic sea ice for 2004) as determined by satellite passive microwave sensors. Noted are ice-free coastal seas along the entire Russian Arctic and a large, ice-free area that extends 300 nautical miles north of the Alaskan coast. The ice edge is also shown to have retreated to a position north of Svalbard. The front cover shows the summer minimum extent of Arctic sea ice on 16 September 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Sovereignty Over the Northwest Passage
    Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 10 Issue 2 1989 Canada's Sovereignty Over the Northwest Passage Donat Pharand University of Ottawa Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the International Law Commons, and the Law of the Sea Commons Recommended Citation Donat Pharand, Canada's Sovereignty Over the Northwest Passage, 10 MICH. J. INT'L L. 653 (1989). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol10/iss2/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CANADA'S SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE Donat Pharand* In 1968, when this writer published "Innocent Passage in the Arc- tic,"' Canada had yet to assert its sovereignty over the Northwest Pas- sage. It has since done so by establishing, in 1985, straight baselines around the whole of its Arctic Archipelago. In August of that year, the U. S. Coast Guard vessel PolarSea made a transit of the North- west Passage on its voyage from Thule, Greenland, to the Chukchi Sea (see Route 1 on Figure 1). Having been notified of the impending transit, Canada informed the United States that it considered all the waters of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago as historic internal waters and that a request for authorization to transit the Northwest Passage would be necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Scale Experience with Kulluk Stationkeeping Operations in Pack Ice (With Reference to Grand Banks Developments) Wright, B
    NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC Full Scale Experience with Kulluk Stationkeeping Operations in Pack Ice (With Reference to Grand Banks Developments) Wright, B. For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous. Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: https://doi.org/10.4224/12327366 PERD/CHC Report 25-44, 2000-07 NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=addc8b5e-cc28-4427-999c-0ac8993b0707 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=addc8b5e-cc28-4427-999c-0ac8993b0707 Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB. Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at [email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information. Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Historical Canadian Beaufort Sea Information Timco, GW
    NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC Overview of Historical Canadian Beaufort Sea Information Timco, G. W.; Frederking, R. For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous. Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: https://doi.org/10.4224/20178991 Technical Report; no. CHC-TR-057, 2009-02-01 NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=539b76cc-3e92-4ecd-8158-3357c9510fbd https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=539b76cc-3e92-4ecd-8158-3357c9510fbd Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB. Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at [email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information. Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Offshore Development Concepts – History and Evolution
    Arctic Offshore Development Concepts – History and Evolution By Roger Pilkington and Frank Bercha Presented by Roger Pilkington At the SNAME AS Luncheon: March 19, 2014 Presentation • Systems and structures used in Beaufort Sea from 1970 to 1990 • Some concepts for Beaufort Development 1980s • Production systems currently in use in Arctic • Some interesting new concepts Rough Timetable • 1960s Panarctic drilled on Arctic Islands • In late 1960s Land sales in Beaufort Sea • Esso acquired land from 0 to ~15m Water Depth • Gulf acquired land from about 15 to about 30 m WD • Dome acquired land from about 30 to about 60m WD • From 1972s and 1989, Esso built sand and spray ice islands • ~1974 Canadian Government brought in Arctic drilling incentives • 1976 to about 1980 Dome brought 4 drillships, 8 support boats, super tanker, and floating dry dock into Arctic. 1980 Kigoriak. Rough Timetable (Cont) • 1981 Dome built Tarsuit Island • 1982 Dome brought SSDC into Arctic • 1983 Esso brought in Caisson Retained Island (CRI) to operate in deeper waters • 1983 Gulf brought Kulluk barge, Molikpaq GBS and 4 support vessels into Arctic • 1984 oil price went down and Government ended drilling incentives • All activity stopped in about 1994 Dome Gulf Esso The 3 Major Ice Zones in Arctic Esso ‐ Nipterk Ice Island Made from flooding ice with water from large pumps Shallow water only Esso sand and gravel island construction in summer and also winter by hauling sand and gravel in trucks over ice Artificial Islands • Ice islands – typically 0 to 3m • Sand and
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Challenges Faced by Arctic Ships
    NTIS # PB2011- SSC-461 STRUCTURAL CHALLENGES FACED BY ARCTIC SHIPS This document has been approved For public release and sale; its Distribution is unlimited SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE 2011 Ship Structure Committee RADM P.F. Zukunft RDML Thomas Eccles U. S. Coast Guard Assistant Commandant, Chief Engineer and Deputy Commander Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security For Naval Systems Engineering (SEA05) and Stewardship Co-Chair, Ship Structure Committee Co-Chair, Ship Structure Committee Mr. H. Paul Cojeen Dr. Roger Basu Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Senior Vice President American Bureau of Shipping Mr. Christopher McMahon Mr. Victor Santos Pedro Director, Office of Ship Construction Director Design, Equipment and Boating Safety, Maritime Administration Marine Safety, Transport Canada Mr. Kevin Baetsen Dr. Neil Pegg Director of Engineering Group Leader - Structural Mechanics Military Sealift Command Defence Research & Development Canada - Atlantic Mr. Jeffrey Lantz, Mr. Edward Godfrey Commercial Regulations and Standards for the Director, Structural Integrity and Performance Division Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security and Stewardship Dr. John Pazik Mr. Jeffery Orner Director, Ship Systems and Engineering Research Deputy Assistant Commandant for Engineering and Division Logistics SHIP STRUCTURE SUB-COMMITTEE AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING (ABS) DEFENCE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CANADA ATLANTIC Mr. Craig Bone Dr. David Stredulinsky Mr. Phil Rynn Mr. John Porter Mr. Tom Ingram MARITIME ADMINISTRATION (MARAD) MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND (MSC) Mr. Chao Lin Mr. Michael W. Touma Mr. Richard Sonnenschein Mr. Jitesh Kerai NAVY/ONR / NAVSEA/ NSWCCD TRANSPORT CANADA Mr. David Qualley / Dr. Paul Hess Natasa Kozarski Mr. Erik Rasmussen / Dr. Roshdy Barsoum Luc Tremblay Mr. Nat Nappi, Jr. Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Day Pioneering and Its Safety in the Floating Ice Offshore
    Modern Day Pioneering and its Safety in the Floating Ice Offshore Arno J. Keinonen AKAC INC. Victoria, B.C. Canada [email protected] Evan H. Martin AKAC INC. Victoria, B.C. Canada [email protected] ABSTRACT al. (2006a), Keinonen et al. (2006b), Keinonen et al. (2000), Pilkington et al. (2006a), Pilkington et al. (2006b), Reed (2006), Tambovsky et al. Floating ice offshore pioneering has been performed since the mid (2006), Wright (1999), and Wright (2000). 1970s. This paper presents the key lessons learned from 5 such operations of wide geographic as well as operational range. The intent FLOATING STATIONARY OPERATIONS IN PACK ICE is to present the safety related lessons from these operations for the OFFSHORE benefit of the future safety of similar operations. Beaufort Sea Drillships KEY WORDS: ice offshore operations; station keeping in ice; ice management; safety in ice. When four open water drillships, upgraded to an ice class and winterized, entered the Beaufort Sea mid seventies, together with INTRODUCTION several ice class supply vessels, the operators had an expectation of having an open water season of a few months each year to be able to Several early pioneers going to the Arctic went all out, all thinking that explore for oil and gas (Keinonen and Martin, 2010). The operation they were well prepared, yet some were clearly not prepared for what itself was expected to be a seasonal summer operation only and not to could happen. Some became heroes while others left their names on interact with ice. pages of history books for not completing their missions, at times paying the ultimate price, losing their lives, equipment and leaving The first pioneering lesson was that the so-called summer season had behind a low level, local pollution to the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Logoboek 2021-01-26
    Offshore Supply and Support Vessels – World Wide JANUARI 2021 A Westcoasting Product Compiled by Ko Rusman, Herbert Westerwal and Dries Stommen [email protected] 1 Fleet List explanatarory notes ABS Marine Services Pvt. Ltd., Chennai, India The fleet listings are shown under the operating groups. The vessel listings indicate: Column 1 – Name of vessel. Column 2 – Year of build. Column 3 – Gross tonnage. Column 4 – Deadweight tonnage. Column 5 – Break horsepower. Column 6 – Bollard pull. Column 7 – Vessel type. ABS Amelia 2010 2177 3250 5452 PSV FiFi 1 Column 8 – FiFi Class. ABS Anokhi 2005 1995 1700 6002 65 AHTS FiFi 1 Explanation column 7 Vessel types: Abu Qurrah Oil Well Maintenance Establishment, Abu Dhabi, UAE PSV –Platform Supply Vessel. AHTS –Anchor Handling Tug Supply. AHT –Anchor Handling Tug. DS –Diving Support Vessel. StBy –Safety Standby Vessel. MAIN –Maintenance Vessel. U-W –Utility Workboat. SEIS –Seismic Survey Vessel. RES –Research Vessel. OILW –Oilwell Stimulation Vessel. OilPol –Oil Pollution Vessel Al Nader 1970 275 687 1700 20 OILW MAIN –Maintenance Vessel. Al-Manarah 1971 275 687 1700 OILW W2W –Walk To Work Vessel. Al-Manarah 2 1998 769 1000 1250 OILW FRU –Floating Regasification Unit. ACSM Agencia Maritima S.L.U., Vigo, Spain Nautilus 2001 2401 3248 5302 PSV ACE Offshore Ltd., Hong Kong, China A & E Petrol Nigeria, Ltd., Warri, Nigeria Guangdong Yuexin 3270 2021 1930 1370 6400 75 AHTS Guangdong Yuexin 3271 2021 1930 1370 6400 75 AHTS O'Misan 1 1968 575 550 1700 PSV Acta Marine Group, Den Helder, Netherlands AAM
    [Show full text]
  • Propeller Design Load Model
    TP 13243E PROPELLER DESIGN LOAD MODEL PREPARED UNDER SUB-CONTRACT TO THE INSTITUTE FOR MARINE DYNAMICS NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA ST. JOHN'S, NEWFOUNDLAND FOR TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CENTRE SAFETY and SECURITY TRANSPORT CANADA BY R.P. BROWNE MARINE CONSULTANTS LIMITED CALGARY, ALBERTA APRIL 1998 TP 13243E PROPELLER DESIGN LOAD MODEL BY R.P. BROWNE R.P. BROWNE MARINE CONSULTANTS LIMITED C.R. REVILL C.R. REVILL MARINE CONSULTANTS LIMITED A.R. RITCH AVRON RITCH CONSULTING LIMITED A.J. KEINONEN AKAC INC. APRIL 1998 iii This report reflects the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the Transportation Development Centre. Un sommaire français se trouve avant la table des matières. ii Transport Transports Canada Canada PUBLICATION DATA FORM 1. Transport Canada Publication No. 2. Project No. 3. Recipient’s Catalogue No. TP 13243E 9021 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Publication Date Propeller Design Load Model April 1998 6. Performing Organization Document No. 7. Author(s) 8. Transport Canada File No. R.P. Browne, C.R. Revill, A.R. Ritch, and A.J. Keinonen ZCD1460-320-6 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. PWGSC File No. Institute for Marine Dynamics, Marine Systems Research Kerwin Place, Memorial University Campus P.O. Box 12093, Station A 11. PWGSC or Transport Canada Contract No. St. John’s, Newfoundland A1B 3T5 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Publication and Period Covered Transportation Development Centre (TDC) Final 800 René Lévesque Blvd. West Suite 600 14. Project Officer Montreal, Quebec Ernst Radloff H3B 1X9 15. Supplementary Notes (Funding programs, titles of related publications, etc.) Co-sponsored by TC Prairie and Northern Region 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2016 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2016 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland revised 14 November 2016 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 255 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2016 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, from or to the Pacific Ocean (Bering Sea) through the Bering Strait. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the west coast of Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (transits 154 and 171). These are shown on the map following, and proceed as follows: 1: Davis Strait, Lancaster Sound, Barrow Strait, Viscount Melville Sound, McClure Strait, Beaufort Sea, Chukchi Sea, Bering Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • SSC-329 Ice Loads and Ship Response to Ice by J.W
    SSC-329 ICE LOADS AND SHIP RESPONSE TO ICE SUMMER 19821WINTER 1983 TEST PROGRAM —“- – ./--- ------- /’ Thiscbcumenthasbeenapproved forpublicreleaseandsalq its distributionisunlimited SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE , ‘ 1990 L“ m ,, ..”&,” .—. Mm C.T. M-k, Jr.,WCG maiasa) a?.T* w. mo- el#J;tyfioe ofhrohnt MA- a8=i8t8 M91nfstrator for Skdgbl=.ins, emtiotm & u. 8. *8t ml&rdmd~timrs writhe Maisistrstion Mr.k m. mlemo Ht. 8. w. 48WW &eut im nimctor reef,nclxlom -8neat #hip *#ipn6 Sotopration & hnnsh BrA=h Directorate Mimralm Namq-rlt Somho MVxl &a Symtas ad a?. w. n. -ma Hr. % w. Sl1811 Vke ?remiAnt mimrirq tifiar A8erigan ●ureau 4 Sbippiq militUy So&lift ~ =R D. 8. =ermnt 9. S. Oast *ati (Sacrotim) SSIPSmcmsx s~Inm Zhe SEIP STRuCmRESUSCWI- wt8 for tbe Ship Structum -ittse oa ttclmicol ●atterx & pmtidiq tdmicd cwdimthn for th determbtioa of geals ●id objectiw8of kbe pr~ru, ●d & wsluatirq ●d Aaterpretifq th rexulta in temm of ●tmctural design, oorntruction ●d ~rntion. B. S. ~AST GUARD Hli D -JLE. smN m. m. STEIN - J. R. WALUCS m. T* w. ~ ~. J. S. SP~CSR m. h. AmmuEYER MR.a. & WIUMNS MR. h. S. 8ThVWX *, JiAVUS- SYSTX ~ AHERICAN ●mxku 0? SEIPP?NG MR. J. ●. O’BRISN (-IMAU) D%. D. -LIU CDR R. ●ISSCK mm.L L. sTmN KR. J. E. Ch~RIK =. B. MAnMrs HR. A. R. ~GX MA. E. G.ARNTSOW[-) nR. G.HmBs (Cmm) KR. R. GIANKEREUI m. L c*2. mm MRITIHSAWINISTMTION JNTERNATZONUSEIP STRDCTDSES mUESS MR. r. SEISOU m. s.c.Srmmm - LxArsm , MR.●. 0. SAmER DR. M.H, ~ KA.n. u. s n. a.a. ~-uMsw BATImALAcmmfYOP &xmm -ITTES a nuxss emt~ m.
    [Show full text]