DISCLAIMER
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency, contractor or subcontractor thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency, contractor or subcontractor thereof. Table of Contents
Overview
I. Nuclear Structure and Dynamics : Exploring the Limits ...... 1
II. To the Quark Structure of Matter...... 17
III. The Phases of Nuclear Matter ...... 29
IV. Fundamental Symmetries and Nuclear Astrophysics ...... 43
V. Facilities, Instrumentation and Technology ...... 53
VI. International Collaboration in Nuclear Science ...... 65
VII. Education and Outreach ...... 69
VIII. Interdisciplinary and Societal Application ...... 81
IX. Recommendation and Resources ...... 111
Appendix ...... 121
OVERVIEW
Introduction The following chapters contain an extensive discussion of major scientific accomplishments Nuclear science has as its objective the under- since the field was reviewed for the 1989 Long standing of nuclei, which are the hearts of atoms Range Plan, the opportunities for the future, our and the place where almost all of the mass of recommendations, and the resources needed to ordinary matter resides. Despite the ubiquity achieve success. of nuclear matter in the universe, understand- Some readers may prefer to obtain a more ing its behavior is a major challenge. Nuclei general flavor of the activities rather than de- are assembled in stars from individual protons tails about the science, the applications, and the and neutrons, and nuclear properties are gov- education associated with nuclear physics. We erned by their motions and interactions within have therefore included a set of “sidebar pages” the nucleus. But, at a deeper level, protons and (the pages with blue backgrounds distributed neutrons themselves are found to have a complex throughout the relevant chapters). We urge the structure, being composed of quarks and gluons general reader to browse through the sidebars to that seem forever trapped inside. And yet, we identify those of interest. While far from inclu- believe quarks and gluons roamed independently sive, the examples shown in the sidebar pages during the first microsecond of the universe’s ex- together with this overview should give readers istence, when the temperature was greater than a picture of some of the accomplishments, op- 1012 degrees Kelvin. Quantum Chromodynamics portunities and goals of nuclear science. (Note: (QCD) is considered to be an exact description of nuclear science includes both nuclear physics the interaction of the quarks, but the complexi- and nuclear chemistry, but this document often ties of the theory make the way in which nuclear uses “nuclear science” and “nuclear physics” in- matter is constructed from quarks still mysteri- terchangeably.) For those who use the Internet ous. we have included an Appendix listing a number Solving this problem is essential to under- of World-Wide-Web addresses that contain infor- standing matter under both normal conditions mation about nuclear physics activities and fa- and conditions very far from normal. Extreme cilities. conditions existed in the early universe, exist in the cores of stars, and can be created in the lab- oratory during collisions between nuclei. While many important issues remain to be re- The Scienti®c Questions solved, the progress already made in nuclear sci- Modern nuclear science research can, broadly ence is remarkable. There is now a clear un- speaking, be subdivided into four scientific thrust derstanding of the role of the various forces of areas, which are described in Chapters I to IV. nature that shape nuclei (only gravitation plays no role in ordinary nuclei), of how the elements I. Nuclear Structure and Dynamics: Exploring were produced in the cosmos, and of the im- the Limits portance and surprising intricacy of symmetry in nature’s blueprint for matter. With that un- Nuclear science is pushing at new frontiers of derstanding has come clarity and consensus as spin, of temperature, and of nuclear stability by to basic questions that must now be answered, building upon the foundation of greatly increased and delineation of the facilities and capabilities understanding of nuclear structure and reactions needed to answer them. Even though one can- earned over the last decades. For example, the not anticipate the answers in basic research, the study of highly deformed shapes and the dis- return on the public’s investment can be maxi- covery of new nuclei provide stringent tests to mized through long-range planning of the most advance our understanding of nuclear structure. promising avenues to explore and the resources The unexpected discovery that many nuclei gen- needed to explore them. erate identical “fingerprints” (rotation spectra),
v
to a precision better than a part per thousand, ing the limits of the Standard Model. This the- demands understanding. New experiments with ory, which includes QCD together with the elec- beams of short-lived radioactive nuclei will push tromagnetic and weak interactions, successfully this frontier and address many important astro- incorporates the known elementary particles and physical issues, such as creation of the elements. forces but is clearly incomplete. For example, the masses of most of the elementary particles are not predictions, but empirical constants, of II. To the Quark Structure of Matter the theory. Observation of tiny violations of fun- Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is the basic damental symmetries can provide crucial guid- theory describing the interactions of quarks and ance towards new theories. A fundamental is- gluons, the underlying constituents of strongly sue for physics, astrophysics, and cosmology, and interacting matter. However, the way in which a major research area in nuclear physics is the quarks and gluons are confined within the nu- question of whether neutrinos (particles like elec- cleons (the protons and neutrons that make up trons, but with no charge) have mass. The Stan- all nuclei), and within the mesons, whose fleet- dard Model says they do not, but evidence from ing existence generates nuclear forces, is poorly nuclear physics hints that they may. Nuclear understood in QCD. New capabilities with elec- physics is also increasingly central to the reso- tron, photon, and proton beams will permit com- lution of a host of astrophysical issues, from cos- prehensive studies of this fundamental issue mology to stellar structure. New detectors now over the next decade and ultimately provide a under construction are expected to yield results bridge between QCD and the current description of fundamental importance in the coming decade. of atomic nuclei and nuclear forces in terms of hadrons (nucleons and mesons).
III. The Phases of Nuclear Matter Nuclear Science in the National Interest Most studies of nuclear matter to date have ex- plored and clarified its properties at or near nor- The goal of nuclear physics research is the under- mal temperatures and densities. As with or- standing of matter at a fundamental level. Nu- dinary materials, phase changes occur with a clear physicists answer questions about how this change of conditions (such as water to steam). matter has formed, how it is held together, how Two kinds of nuclear phase change are regarded it is structured, how it interacts in collision, and as likely to occur, and tantalizing glimpses of how it is transformed in stellar interiors. Pur- the first may have been seen in recent experi- suit of this goal entails developing new technolo- ments. Heavy-ion collisions at intermediate en- gies and advanced facilities, educating young sci- ergy will explore what appears to be the analog entists, training a technical workforce, and con- for quantum systems of a liquid-gas phase tran- tributing to the broader science and technology sition. At still higher energy densities, the tran- enterprise through the many intersections of nu- sition from hot dense nuclear matter to a quark- clear physics with other disciplines. The knowl- gluon plasma is anticipated. This latter phase edge, technology and well-trained young scien- of matter, in which quarks and gluons are de- tists that result from nuclear physics research confined, existed for only several millionths of a will continue to yield a rich harvest of future ap- second after the Big Bang and may exist today plications and benefits for both science and soci- in the cores of neutron stars. Ultrarelativistic ety. heavy ions are the best way to create and study Basic research has benefits that extend far be- the quark-gluon plasma in the laboratory. yond the original search, often in completely un- expected ways. Nuclear science, a research activ- IV. Fundamental Symmetries and Nuclear Astro- ity that is today funded at the several-hundred- physics million dollar level, has been the basis of busi- ness activity that now totals tens of billions Precision experiments at low and intermediate of dollars per year. Nuclear medicine, nuclear energy using nuclei and the techniques of nuclear power, the very security of the nation itself, are physics continue to play an essential role, com- but a part of that activity. No less important are plementary to high energy experiments, in prob- the individuals from whose creativity the nation
vi
has benefited; one-eighth of all Ph.D.’s awarded important topic is discussed at greater length at in physics in the U.S. are trained in nuclear the end of this Overview and in Chapter IX. physics. The reader is invited to look through The major scientific thrusts define a set of re- Chapters VII and VIII to see the remarkable in- quirements for the science, and the last decade fluence of nuclear science on the nation’s well- has seen substantial investments in people, being. ideas, instrumentation, and facilities. Facili- ties in operation and under construction are de- scribed, and recommendations for upgrades and future facilities driven by scientific priorities are presented in Chapter V. The forefront facilities The Long Range Plan both in the United States and abroad attract This Long Range Plan (LRP) builds upon and significant international scientific collaboration, extends those prepared by the Nuclear Science and opportunities for enhanced collaboration are Advisory Committee (NSAC) in 1979, 1983 and discussed in Chapter VI. 1989. The LRP process has been successful in This Plan presents progress and prospects in establishing a dialogue of consequence among nuclear science activities beyond those associ- the nuclear science community, the Department ated with forefront research. Education of the of Energy, the National Science Foundation, next generation of scientists is an important Congress, and the Administration. The agencies corollary of fundamental research, and nuclear jointly charged NSAC in September 1994 to pro- physics contributes substantially in this area. vide a new study of scientific opportunities and Another corollary is use of the unique assets of priorities and to address the question of equip- the nuclear physics research enterprise to im- ment and facilities needed in the future. The prove public scientific and technical literacy in full charge is reproduced in the Appendix. general. The commitment to such activities is In preparing a response, NSAC sought and re- steadily growing, as the reader will discover in ceived extensive community input. We collabo- Chapter VII. rated with the Division of Nuclear Physics of the The scientific and educational priorities and American Physical Society in sponsoring six town recommendations arrived at by the Long Range meetings, held from coast to coast. Many hun- Plan Working Group are presented in Chapter dreds of scientists participated, producing “white IX, together with an analysis of the funding re- papers” summarizing progress and prospects in sources required to carry out the program. The different parts of nuclear science. Additional re- proposed program builds upon and extends that ports were generated by community groups with framed by earlier Long Range Plans and thereby more specific interests. Presentations were made renews the process of responsibly shaping the na- to NSAC by management of each of the user fa- tion’s investment in a continuing world-class nu- cilities. Finally, a balanced group of sixty-four clear science program at the dawn of the twenty- nuclear scientists, the Long Range Plan Work- first century. ing Group, met in Pasadena, California during The Recommendations are summarized below March 16-21, 1995 to fold all of this input into in boldface type with explanatory information in this Long Range Plan for Nuclear Science. We the accompanying paragraphs. The full text is benefited from the participation of representa- given in Chapter IX. tives from nuclear science advisory committees in Europe and Japan. This document is the re- sult of that effort. The Long Range Plan puts forward the nu- clear science community’s goals and priorities Recommendations for addressing fundamental questions in the four thrust areas of research. It recommends a pro- gram that will significantly advance those re- 1. The highest priority for U.S. nuclear sci- search directions while educating a new gener- ence is vigorous pursuit of the scientific ation of scientists. The program outlined is one opportunities provided by the nation’s re- with extraordinary discovery potential, but it can cent investments in forefront instrumen- only be achieved within the budgetary guidance tation and facilities. Scientific, techno- contained in the agencies’ charge to NSAC. This logical and educational returns commensu-
vii
rate with these investments will require re- tion of experimental apparatus and is now be- sources consistent with those in the charge ginning to explore the physics. The laboratory requesting this Long Range Plan. should now be operated at a level commensurate with the investment and the science opportunity. The assignment of highest priority to utiliza- With the superconducting accelerator technology tion of the array of new tools and facilities is at CEBAF performing so well, the community consistent with maximizing the return on invest- looks forward to future increases in CEBAF’s ments already made and is clearly important in energy, and to the scientific opportunities that this time of great pressure on federal resources. would bring. If fully utilized, these investments will greatly advance our understanding of strongly interact- 2. RHIC remains our highest construction ing matter, which is the goal of the field. The priority. Its timely completion and opera- Scientific Facilities Utilization Initiative of the tion are of utmost importance for discovery DOE precisely addresses this need, the highest of the quark-gluon plasma and for study of priority for nuclear science, and its continuation this new form of matter. and reinforcement are most important. The rec- ommendation applies equally to the very large The highest priority for new construction in facilities CEBAF and RHIC (once it begins oper- the 1989 Plan was the Relativistic Heavy Ion Col- ation) and to the lower-energy facilities at uni- lider (RHIC). Its principal goal is to study, in the versities and national laboratories, and to de- laboratory, matter at the highest achievable en- tectors that provide essential complements at ergy densities, as it existed in the early universe. the nuclear-physics frontiers. It entails support The transition to deconfined matter, that is, mat- for the scientific personnel needed to carry out ter in which the quark and gluon constituents of the experiments, provide the theoretical frame- protons, neutrons, and other hadrons are able work, and educate the next generation through to propagate over significant distances, is a fun- strong university programs. It requires an ongo- damental prediction of QCD. Establishing this ing level of investment in new instrumentation transition will represent a major step in scien- to meet evolving scientific needs. The funding tific exploration of the world about us. RHIC con- guidance supplied to NSAC for this Long Range struction is now well advanced and is on sched- Plan, although substantially more constrained ule for a 1999 completion date. The unique op- than earlier projections, will permit a produc- portunities to discover and study new phenom- tive program. This forward-looking and balanced ena at RHIC have led to the formation of vigor- program has been achieved at the cost of sig- ous international collaborations whose members nificant and difficult program reductions, which are investing major efforts in advanced detectors have been effected since the 1989 Long Range suited to RHIC’s unexplored regime of ultrarela- Plan. tivistic heavy-ion collisions. Clearly, very large facilities require especially careful planning and sustained commitments. In Initiatives this regard, completion of CEBAF and the start of RHIC construction represent significant mile- A number of facility initiatives and upgrades that stones in the NSAC long range planning pro- would greatly enhance U. S. capabilities in nu- cess. Timely completion and operation of CE- clear science have been proposed. Within the fi- BAF was the highest priority in the 1989 Long nancial boundaries of our charge (discussed be- Range Plan, reflecting the nuclear science com- low), we recommend selected initiatives in the munity’s commitment to a multi-GeV, high in- areas of radioactive beams and hadron beams. tensity, continuous electron beam facility recom- The ability to create nuclei at the limits of mended in the 1979 Long Range Plan. CEBAF stability has generated world-wide scientific in- has started its important science program this terest. Near those limits, new regularities are year. As the world’s most powerful “microscope” anticipated, the presence or absence of which for probing the electromagnetic structure of nu- would profoundly influence our understanding of clei, CEBAF will provide essential data for bridg- nuclear structure and the symmetries governing ing the hadronic and quark descriptions of nu- nuclear behavior. Results from first-generation clear matter . A large user community invested programs of limited scope being pursued in the an enormous effort in the design and construc- U.S. have heightened the interest. New capa-
viii