THE YEAR 2015 01 • the Year 2015 • New at Arctia in 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
THE CLIMATE CASE AGAINST ARCTIC DRILLING August 2015
AUGUST 2015 UNTOUCHABLE: THE CLIMATE CASE AGAINST ARCTIC DRILLING August 2015 Conceived, written and researched by Hannah McKinnon with contributions from Steve Kretzmann, Lorne Stockman, and David Turnbull Oil Change International (OCI) exposes the true costs of fossil fuels and identifies and overcomes barriers to the coming transition towards clean energy. Oil Change International works to achieve its mission by producing strategic research and hard-hitting, campaign-relevant investigations; engaging in domestic and international policy and media spaces; and providing leadership in and support for resistance to the political influence of the fossil fuel industry, particularly in North America. www.priceofoil.org Twitter: @priceofoil Greenpeace is the leading independent campaigning organization that uses peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and to promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. www.greenpeace.org Cover: ©Cobbing/Greenpeace CONTENTS SUMMARY 2 Key Findings 3 UNBURNABLE CARBON 4 ARCTIC OIL FAILS THE CLIMATE TEST 5 THE PERCEPTION OF NEED AND A BET ON CLIMATE FAILURE 6 Arctic Oil Is Too Expensive for the Climate 8 LEADING THE PACK IN THE HUNT FOR UNBURNABLE CARBON 10 STRANDED ASSETS 11 FOSSIL FUEL FATALISM 13 #SHELLNO: PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY RISKS 14 CONCLUSION 16 2 SUMMARY There is a clear logic that can be applied to the global challenge of addressing climate change: when you are in a hole, stop digging. An iceberg spotted in calm waters on the edge of Kane Basin, If we are serious about tackling the global climate crisis, we need in late evening light. to stop exploring, expanding, and ultimately exploiting fossil fuels. -
District Court Pleadings Caption
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF SEATTLE 8 In the Matter of the Appeal of: ) Hearing Examiner File No. S-15-001 9 ) (DPD Project No. 3020324) FOSS MARITIME COMPANY ) 10 ) from an Interpretation by the Director, Department ) 11 of Planning and Development. ) ) 12 _________________________________________ ) ) Hearing Examiner File No. S-15-002 13 In the Matter of the Appeal of the: ) (DPD Project No. 3020324) ) 14 PORT OF SEATTLE, ) ) PUGET SOUNDKEEPER’S 15 from Interpretation No. 15-001 of the Director of ) THIRD UPDATED EXHIBIT the Department of Planning and Development. ) LIST AND WITNESS LIST 16 ) ) 17 18 Puget Soundkeeper Alliance, Seattle Audubon Society, Sierra Club, and Washington 19 Environmental Council (collectively “Soundkeeper”) respectfully submit this third updated list 20 of exhibits and witnesses. Soundkeeper will provide two hard copies of the exhibits to the 21 Hearing Examiner for the Examiner and the Witness binders. Soundkeeper is submitting these 22 exhibits to address objections and issues that have been raised in the direct testimony and cross- 23 examination of some of the Port’s witnesses. 24 25 Earthjustice SOUNDKEEPER’S THIRD UPDATED 705 Second Ave., Suite 203 EXHIBIT LIST AND WITNESS LIST - 1 - Seattle, WA 98104-1711 26 (206) 343-7340 27 1 Additionally, Soundkeeper originally submitted excerpts of documents as PSA Exs. 13- 2 15 and 17-18; Foss objected to the excerpted nature of the documents at hearing. Soundkeeper 3 has provided the complete documents to counsel and has asked whether they would be willing to 4 stipulate to submitting only the excerpts since the remainders of each of the documents have no 5 relevance to this proceeding. -
This Document Has Been Downloaded from Tampub – the Institutional Repository of University of Tampere
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Trepo - Institutional Repository of Tampere University This document has been downloaded from TamPub – The Institutional Repository of University of Tampere Post-print The permanent address of the publication is http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:uta-201405281513 Author(s): Kankaanpää, Jari; Oulasvirta, Lasse; Wacker, Jani Title: Steering and Monitoring Model of State-Owned Enterprises Year: 2014 Journal Title: International Journal of Public Administration Vol and number: 37 : 7 Pages: 409-423 ISSN: 0190-0692 Discipline: Business and management; Political science School /Other Unit: School of Management Item Type: Journal Article Language: en DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.858355 URN: URN:NBN:fi:uta-201405281513 All material supplied via TamPub is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication or sale of all part of any of the repository collections is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for your research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, whether for sale or otherwise to anyone who is not an authorized user. Steering and Monitoring Model of State-Owned Enterprises Introduction Privatisation of stated-owned enterprises (SOEs) gained considerable momentum in developing and developed countries in the 1980s and 1990s (The World Bank, 2006, p. 3). Despite wide-ranging privatisation programmes, SOEs are still and will be an important part of many economies, especially in developing economies (La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, & Shleifer, 1999; Ezzamel, Wilmott, & Worthington, 2008; Vagliasindi, 2008; Ennser-Jedenastik, 2013). -
Finland Commercial Guide
Finland Table of Contents Doing Business in Finland ___________________________________________ 6 Market Overview ____________________________________________________ 6 Market Challenges __________________________________________________ 7 Market Opportunities ________________________________________________ 7 Market Entry Strategy _______________________________________________ 8 Political Environment _______________________________________________ 9 Political Environment _______________________________________________ 9 Selling US Products & Services _______________________________________ 9 Using an Agent to Sell US Products and Services _________________________ 9 Establishing an Office ______________________________________________ 10 Franchising _______________________________________________________ 10 Direct Marketing___________________________________________________ 10 Joint Ventures/Licensing ____________________________________________ 11 Selling to the Government ___________________________________________ 12 Distribution & Sales Channels________________________________________ 12 Express Delivery ___________________________________________________ 13 Selling Factors & Techniques ________________________________________ 14 eCommerce _______________________________________________________ 14 Overview ____________________________________________________________________ 14 Current Market Trends ________________________________________________________ 15 Domestic eCommerce (B2C) ____________________________________________________ -
2017 Annual Report
THE YEAR 2017 1 THE YEAR 2017 News in 2017 ......................................................................... 04 Arctia 2017 The year 2017 in figures ..................................................... 05 CEO’s review .......................................................................... 06 2 ARCTIA Operating environment ....................................................... 08 Core messages and organisation ......................................... 12 Corporate social responsibility management ..................... 17 Financial responsibility ......................................................... 22 Society and human rights .................................................... 25 RELIABLE SERVICES IN Environment ......................................................................... 29 3 SERVICES CHALLENGING CONDITIONS The Baltic Sea ........................................................................ 35 Polar and subpolar regions .................................................. 38 Oil spill preparedness and response .................................... 40 Arctia’s key task is to safeguard icebreaking operations and Harbour icebreaking ............................................................ 41 winter navigation in the Finnish marine areas. We offer our Arctia Events ......................................................................... 42 customers reliable maritime services in challenging conditions 4 PERSONNEL AND GOVERNANCE throughout the world. In 2017, we achieved all the service Personnel and governance -
Arctic Law & Policy Year in Review
Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy Volume 5 Issue 1 Arctic Special Edition 6-1-2015 Arctic Law & Policy Year in Review: 2014 Arctic Law & Policy Institute, University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wjelp Part of the Environmental Law Commons, Law of the Sea Commons, and the Natural Resources Law Commons Recommended Citation Arctic Law & Policy Institute, University of Washington, Arctic Law & Policy Year in Review: 2014, 5 WASH. J. ENVTL. L. & POL'Y 97 (2015). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wjelp/vol5/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : Arctic Law & Policy Year in Review: 2014 Copyright © 2016 by Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy ARCTIC LAW & POLICY YEAR IN REVIEW: 2015 Arctic Law & Policy Institute, University of Washington* I. INTRODUCTION: ARCTIC NEWS HIGHLIGHTS ........... 73 II. TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ............................................................... 79 A. U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea ................... 79 B. U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change ... 80 C. International Convention for Prevention of Pollution from Ships ................................................. 81 D. Arctic Council Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response in the Arctic............................................... 82 E. Arctic Council Agreement on Cooperation on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue in the Arctic ............................................................... 82 F. Declaration Concerning the Prevention of Unregulated High Seas Fishing in the Central Arctic Ocean ............................................................. -
Vector Data Extraction from Forward-Looking Sonar Imagery for Hydrographic Survey and Hazard to Navigation Detection
Vector Data Extraction from Forward-Looking Sonar Imagery for Hydrographic Survey and Hazard to Navigation Detection R. Glenn Wright Cheryl M. Zimmerman GMATEK, Inc., Annapolis, MD USA FarSounder, Inc. World Maritime University, Malmo, Sweden Warwick, RI USA [email protected] / [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— This paper describes research to determine the investigating its use as a means to navigate in uncharted and effectiveness of forward-looking sonar as a means to safely poorly charted areas are described along with their results navigate vessels in frontiers such as the Arctic and other regions illustrating the effectiveness of this technology and limitations that may be lacking recent or comprehensive hydrographic that may restrict its use. Conclusions regarding the viability of survey. Key elements of this investigation include the range at FL sonar to aid in vessel navigation are provided, along with which valid measurements may be taken, uncertainty in future directions in research likely to follow. measurement, confidence level of the measured value and resolution available to detect underwater hazards affixed to the II. CHARTING DEFICIENCIES bottom and suspended within the water column to provide time sufficient to enable the crew to take action to alter course and/or The deficiencies of hydrographic surveys in areas such as speed to avoid casualty. An additional factor involves examining the Arctic and the vast archipelagos of the Pacific Ocean have forward-looking sonar measurements as a means to survey been demonstrated through dramatic groundings of vessels. shallow sea bottom where hydrography data does not exist or is One example is the cruise chip M/V Clipper Adventurer that not accurate, potentially offering a valuable resource to ran aground on 27 August 2010 in Coronation Gulf, Nunavut supplement scarce national hydrographic office assets to in the Northwest Passage on an uncharted shelf in an area accomplish this task. -
North East Greenland 2015 Seismic Survey
North East Greenland 2015 Seismic Survey Scope of Works Prepared for: TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company ASA NE Greenland Seismic Survey 2015 TGS Document: J3269 TGS (NEG15 Scoping) v2 Version Date Description Prepared by Checked Approved by by 1 27/11/14 Issued Draft IGP/PC MC/TGS IGP 2 22/12/14 Updated Survey Data PO IGP IGP Tables. Confirmation of EIA requirement. This report has been prepared by Centre for Marine and Coastal Studies Ltd (CMACS). Contact Details: CMACS Ltd 80 Eastham Village Road Eastham Wirral CH62 0AW UK Company No 4883990 Tel: +44 (0)151 3277 177 [email protected] www.cmacsltd.co.uk TGS Lensmannslia 4 N-1386 Asker, Norway Tel: +47 66 76 99 00 Fax: +47 66 76 99 10 Postal Address: P.O. Box 154, N-1371 Asker, Norway www.tgs.com CMACS: J3269 TGS (NEG15 Scoping) v2 NE Greenland Seismic Survey 2015 TGS Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY ............................................... 5 2.1 Licence number and licencee ........................................................................ 5 2.2 Overview of vessels ...................................................................................... 5 Seismic survey vessel ......................................................................................... 6 Support Operations ............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Seismic survey ............................................................................................. -
Liikenne- Ja Viestintäministeriö Mahti-Asiakirjamalli
1(2) Programme Motorways of the Sea -visit, programme Visit of the European Coordinator for the Motorways of the Sea to Finland 11.-13.12.2017 11.12.2017 Day 1 The Baltic Sea best practices 07:30-12:00 Flight Brussels-Helsinki / Flight Manchester-Helsinki 12:00-12:30 Lunch, IB Sisu, Arctia, Laivastokatu 9 12:30-13:30 The Baltic Sea best maritime practices, Arctia, Laivastokatu 9 o Opening of the MoS visit and the Baltic Sea best practices seminar, Lassi Hilska, ministry of transport and communication o Welcome to Arctia, Tero Vauraste, Arctia o Arctia icebreaking services, Tom Ekegren, Arctia o Winter navigation, Tuomas Taivi, Finnish Transport Agency o Vessel Traffic Services VTS and STM -project, Thomas Erlund, Finnish Transport Agency o Hydrographic surveying progress in the Baltic Sea, FAMOS Odin -project, Seppo Mäkinen, Finnish Transport Agency / Hydrographic Office and An- dreas Andersson, Swedish Maritime Administration 13:30-14:30 Visiting IB Polaris and IB Voima, WINMOS II -project 15:15-15:45 Meeting with the ministry of transport Anne Berner, Parliament of Finland, Mannerheimintie 30, Helsinki 12.12.2017 Day 2 Upgrade of the maritime links 9:00-10:00 Gathering and introduction of the terminal, Port of Helsinki, West Terminal 2, Tyynenmerenkatu 14, Helsinki 10:30-12:30 M/S Megastar Helsinki-Tallinna, Comfort Lounge, deck 8 MoS seminar: o Detailed Implementation plan of MoS, Brian Simpson o Short presentations and status of the ongoing MoS projects: . DOOR2LNG, Antti Laukkanen, Containerships . Bothnia Bulk, Mikki Koskinen, ESL Shipping . NextGen Link, Markku Alahäme, Port of Turku . Upgrade and development of the intermodal Baltic MoS link Rostock-Hanko, Lotta Gottberg, Port of Hanko . -
Opinnäytetyön Asettelumalli
Sami Santalahti SUUREMPIEN NOSTOKOKONAISUUKSIEN VAIKUTUS LOHKOVALMISTUKSEN AIKATAULUIHIN Logistiikan koulutusohjelma 2013 SUUREMPIEN NOSTOKOKONAISUUKSIEN VAIKUTUS LOHKOVALMISTUKSEN AIKATAULUIHIN Santalahti, Sami Satakunnan ammattikorkeakoulu Logistiikan koulutusohjelma Toukokuu 2013 Ohjaaja: Tempakka, Riitta Sivumäärä: 46 Liitteitä: 8 (liitteet 3 - 8 luottamuksellisia) Asiasanat: laivanrakennus, lohkorakentaminen, lohkotehdas ____________________________________________________________________ Tämä opinnäytetyö on tehty STX Finland Oy:n Rauman telakan lohkotehtaalle. Opinnäytetyön ensisijainen tarkoitus oli tutkia onko lohkotehtaalla tarkoituksen mu- kaista rakentaa tavanomaisesta suurempia laivan rakenteita. Työssä tutkittiin miten suurempien nostokokonaisuuksien tekeminen ja käsittelemi- nen eroaa niin sanottujen normaalikokoisten nostokokonaisuuksien rakentamisesta. Lohkotehtaan infrastruktuuri on suunniteltu näille normaali kokoisille nostokokonai- suuksille ja suurempien nostokokonaisuuksien vuoksi pitikin tehdä jotain erityisjär- jestelyjä, jotta työ saatiin tehtyä. THE EFFECT OF LARGER SHIP BLOCK ON PRODUCTION SCHEDULE Santalahti Sami Satakunnan ammattikorkeakoulu, Satakunta University of Applied Sciences Degree Programme in engineer May 2013 Supervisor: Tempakka Riitta Number of pages: 46 Appendices: 8 (confidential from 3 to 8) Keywords: ship building, block building, block factory ____________________________________________________________________ This thesis has been made of STX Finland Oy's Rauma shipyard block factory. The -
Actic Law & Policy Year in Review: 2015
University of Washington School of Law UW Law Digital Commons Articles Faculty Publications 2016 Actic Law & Policy Year in Review: 2015 Craig H. Allen University of Washington School of Law Bridgette J. Cooper Adam Murray Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles Part of the Administrative Law Commons, International Law Commons, and the Law of the Sea Commons Recommended Citation Craig H. Allen, Bridgette J. Cooper, and Adam Murray, Actic Law & Policy Year in Review: 2015, 6 Wash. J. Envtl. L. & Pol'y 71 (2016), https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles/78 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright © 2016 by Washington Journal of Environmental Law & Policy ARCTIC LAW & POLICY YEAR IN REVIEW: 2015 Arctic Law & Policy Institute, University of Washington* I. INTRODUCTION: ARCTIC NEWS HIGHLIGHTS ........... 73 II. TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ............................................................... 79 A. U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea ................... 79 B. U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change ... 80 C. International Convention for Prevention of Pollution from Ships ................................................. 81 D. Arctic Council Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response in the Arctic............................................... 82 E. Arctic Council Agreement on Cooperation on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue in the Arctic ............................................................... 82 F. Declaration Concerning the Prevention of Unregulated High Seas Fishing in the Central Arctic Ocean .............................................................. 83 III. -
Arctia Shippingsafeguarding the Environment
YEAR 2014 Arctia Shipping safeguarding the environment The year 2014 Best icebreaking services • The year 2014 in brief ..................................................................04 • CEO’s Review ................................................................................05 • News in 2014 ................................................................................06 SAFELY Arctia Shipping in brief • Operating environment ...............................................................09 • Core messages and organisation ................................................12 ON ICY SEAS • Corporate social responsibility ....................................................14 The principal task of Arctia Shipping is to ensure the smooth flow Service areas • Icebreaking services ......................................................................19 of winter navigation so as to enable the daily work of Finnish • Offshore services ..........................................................................22 • Oil recovery services .....................................................................24 industry and citizens to proceed without disruptions caused by • Harbour icebreaking services .......................................................26 ice conditions. We achieved all of the service targets set for us on • Events services ..............................................................................28 the Baltic Sea in 2014. Outside the icebreaking season, we also Personnel and governance successfully exported Finnish