Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 126 / Friday, June 30, 1995 / Proposed Rules 34225

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 126 / Friday, June 30, 1995 / Proposed Rules 34225 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 126 / Friday, June 30, 1995 / Proposed Rules 34225 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR northwest portion of the North Slope. ACTION: Notice of candidate species Recent surveys suggest the species no reclassification. Fish and Wildlife Service longer nests in certain areas in which it originally occurred on the North Slope. SUMMARY: In this document, the U.S. 50 CFR Part 17 Factors causing the decline of the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) RIN: 1018±AC19 species and the contraction of its provides explanation for changes in the breeding range in Alaska are not known. candidate status of 32 species of plants Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Due to the reduction in numbers and and animals that are under review for and Plants; Reopening of Comment contraction of the species' breeding possible addition to the List of Period on Proposed Threatened Status range in Alaska, the Service believes Endangered and Threatened Wildlife for the Alaska Breeding Population of that the remaining population of and Plants (List) under the Endangered the Steller's Eider Steller's eiders is increasingly Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended. vulnerable to extirpation. The changes for which explanation is AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, provided in this document were Interior. On July 14, 1994, the Service published a proposed rule (59 FR 35896; previously published for 20 plants in ACTION: Extension of proposed rule; July 1, 1994) to list the Alaska breeding the 1993 Plant Notice of Review and for reopening of comment period. population of Steller's eiders as 12 animals in the 1994 Animal Notice of Review. SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife threatened under the Endangered FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: E. Service (Service) provides notice that Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended LaVerne Smith, Chief, Division of the comment period on the proposal to (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Comments Endangered Species, U.S. Fish and classify the Alaska breeding population received during the initial public Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. of the Steller's eider (Polysticta stelleri) comment period indicate scientific 20240 (703/358±2171). as threatened is extended until January controversy exists over the Service's 14, 1996, due to significant scientific technical interpretation of available SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: data. In order to insure that decisions on controversy over the species' status. In Background addition, the public comment period is endangered and threatened species are hereby reopened. based upon the best scientific and In December 1992, the Service commercial data available, the Service DATES: The comment period, which reached a settlement agreement now requires that listing proposals be originally closed on November 14, 1994, (agreement) with the plaintiffs in the reviewed by three appropriate is reopened effective immediately and Fund For Animals et al. v. Lujan et al. independent specialists (59 FR 34270). closes on January 14, 1996. case (Civ. No. 92±800) that provides for To comply with this recent policy and the Service to review the listing status ADDRESSES: Written comments and to adequately address the scientific of species regarded as Category 1 materials should be sent to Fairbanks controversy, the Service is reopening candidates as of September 1, 1992. The Ecological Services field Office, the comment period on the proposal to Service has historically classified Endangered Species, U.S. Fish and list the Alaska breeding population of species regarded as candidates for Wildlife Service, 1412 Airport Way, Steller's eiders and now solicits the listing under the Endangered Species Fairbanks, Alaska, 99701, telephone expert opinions of three independent Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 (907) 456±0427 or facsimile (907) 456± specialists. All interested parties are U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) into two primary 0346. Comments and materials received invited to comment on this proposal categories. Category 1 candidates are will be available for public inspection, during the comment period. Written those species for which the Service has by appointment, during normal business comments may now be submitted until on file sufficient information on hours at the above address. January 14, 1996, to the Service office in biological vulnerability and threat(s) to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the ADDRESSES section. support proposals to list them as Ted Swen at the above address Authors endangered or threatened species. (telephone 907/456±0427). Category 2 candidates are taxa for which SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary author of this notice is information now in the possession of Ted Swem (see ADDRESSES section). the Service indicates that proposing to Background Authority list as endangered or threatened is The smallest of four eider species, the possibly appropriate, but for which Steller's eider breeds in coastal areas of The authority for this action is the substantial data on biological arctic Alaska and Russia. Worldwide, Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 vulnerability and threat are not Steller's eiders still number over one U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). currently available to support a hundred thousand, with the vast Dated: June 20, 1995. proposed listing. Species classified as majority of individuals nesting in Asia John G. Rogers, Category 2* are those whose continued and wintering in Alaskan waters. A existence is in doubt. Species classified Director, Fish and Wildlife Service. small portion of the world's Steller's as Category 3 were once considered for eiders nest in Alaska and this nesting [FR Doc. 95±16075 Filed 6±29±95; 8:45 am] listing as threatened or endangered but population is being proposed for listing BILLING CODE 4310±55±M are no longer under such consideration. as a distinct vertebrate population under For any candidate species covered by the endangered Species Act. In recent 50 CFR Part 17 the agreement and removed from years the breeding range of the species Category 1 because listing is not in Alaska has contracted. The species, Endangered and Threatened Species; warranted, the Service must publish a which nests locally at several coastal Notice of Reclassification of 32 notice in the Federal Register that locations in the central Yukon- Candidate Species provides explanation for the removal Kuskokwim Delta, has now virtually from Category 1. disappeared from this region. In Alaska, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, This notice provides explanations for the species currently nests only in the Interior. previously announced decisions to 34226 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 126 / Friday, June 30, 1995 / Proposed Rules remove candidate species from Category in the early 1900's; and Phyllostegia reproductive success, and trends in 1. The changes announced in this notice imminuta, last observed in 1980. abundance unknown, maintaining this reflect changes first published in the Abutilon virginianum (Indian mallow) species in Category 1 is not justified. 1993 Plant Notice of Review (58 FR was originally collected in Culebra, Conostegia hotteana is a small to 51444) or the 1994 Animal Notice of Puerto Rico, but according to a recent medium sized tree known only from the Review (59 FR 58982). This notice also status survey, has not been seen there island of Hispaniola and the eastern provides explanation for returning three since 1913. The species was removed mountains of Puerto Rico. There is no candidate species covered by the from Category 1 status because its current information on distribution or settlement agreement to Category 1 continued existence in the wild is in abundance of this plant and review of status. doubt. the file information indicates that Nelson's antelope ground squirrel classification as Category 1 was Findings (Ammospermophilus nelsoni) was premature. Additional information on Two species of animals that were historically found in the southern San biological distribution and abundance, removed from the Category 1 candidate Joaquin Valley of California. Presently habitat needs, and threats to the species list in the 1994 Animal Notice of the populations are more restricted and is needed before a proposal to list would Review are now returned to Category 1 are located in the San Joaquin area. The be justified. status. The northern Idaho ground species was removed from Category 1 Descurainia torulosa (Wyoming squirrel (Spermophilus brunneus) was status because its range is more tansymustard) is known only from the incorrectly placed in Category 2 status widespread on slopes and hillsides than high volcanic mountains in northwest in the 1994 Animal Notice of Review. originally thought. Also, the Wyoming and Pine Butte in southwest Wild specimens of the greenest tiger destruction, modification, or Wyoming. The species was removed beetle (Cicindella tranquebarica curtailment of the species' habitat or from Category 1 status primarily viridissima) were recently discovered range will be controlled by because of taxonomic questions and the near the Santa Ana River, California. implementation of the San Joaquin apparently large amount of suitable Based on this rediscovery and present Endangered Species Recovery Program, habitat that has not been searched for knowledge of threats, the species is now which will include setting aside foothill the species. Descurainia torulosa may in returned to Category 1 status. habitat for species such as the San fact be a minor variant of the common One plant species that was removed Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) D. incana. Successful searches for from the Category 1 candidate list in the and giant kangaroo rat (Dipodomys additional populations were conducted 1993 Plant Notice of Review is being ingens). This will provide de facto in the 1980's by various investigators, returned to Category 1 status. Although protection for Nelson's antelope ground suggesting that additional searches in previously thought to be extinct, squirrel. suitable habitat will yield more Eragrostis fosbergii (Fosberg's love Aster avitus (Alexander's rock aster) populations. grass) has been rediscovered and is now was classified as a Category 1 species The short-nosed kangaroo rat classified as a Category 1 candidate.
Recommended publications
  • Supplemental Botany Report
    United States Department of Agriculture Supplemental Botany Forest Service Specialist Report Southwestern Region November 2013 Coconino Forest Plan Revision DEIS Submitted by: __/s/ _________________________ Debra L. Crisp. Forest Botanist Coconino NF Botany Specialist Report Coconino NF 12/9/2013 5:05 PM The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities. i Botany Specialist Report Coconino NF 12/9/2013 5:05 PM Preface The information in this specialist report reflects analysis that was completed prior to and in conjunction with the completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the revision of the 1987 Coconino National Forest Land Management Plan (the Plan). The primary purpose of specialist reports associated with the DEIS is to provide detailed information to assist in the preparation of the DEIS. As the DEIS was prepared, review-driven edits to the broader DEIS resulted in modifications to some of the information contained in some of the specialist reports. As a result, some reports no longer contain information and analysis that was updated through an interdisciplinary review process and is included in the DEIS in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Rare Plant Advisory Group Sensitive Plant List -June 2014
    ARIZONA RARE PLANT ADVISORY GROUP SENSITIVE PLANT LIST -JUNE 2014 •.. -e 'I"': ~ ~ •.. ·s o 0 .g o rn u rn '•".. ..>: ::s ~ ~ ~ 0"' tU I': ~ ~ Z ..•.. ~ '" u ::... 0 ~ E 0 u -; •.. is '5 rn 0 0 ~ ;::l ~ "g u d iL< ..>: ~ 0 •.. ~ s •.... "B .. § 0 ; 0 ~ ~ U ~ il< < ~ E-< ~ VERY HIGH CONCERN Agave delamateri Hodgs. & Slauson Asparagaceae w.e L Tonto Basin Agave 7 7 7 c Asparagaceae Agave phillipsiana w.e Hodgs wand Canvon Centurv Plant 7 7 7 nc Aotragalus crt!mnophylax uar: crt!mnophylax Bameby Fabaceae Sentrv Milk-vetch 7 8 7.5 c AOfragalus holmgreniomm Bameby Fabaceae Holmgren (Paradox) Milk-vetch 7 7 7 c Orobanchaceae Castilleja mogollonica PeJ2lJell Mogollon Paintbrush 7 8 7.5 Lv c Apiaceae Eryngium sparganophyllum HemsL Ribbonleaf Button Snakeroot 6 8 7 v? nc Lotus meamsii var. equisolensis].L Anderson Fabaccae Horseshoe Deer Vetch 6 8 7 nc Cactaceae Pediacactus brat!Ji L Benson Brady Pincushion Cactus 7 7 7 c Boraginaceae Phacelia cronquistiana S.L Wel,.h Cronquist's Phacelia 7 8 7.5 nc PotClltil1a arizona Greene Rosaceae Arizone Cinquefoil 6 8 7 nc Sphaeralcea gierischii N.D. Atwood & S.L Welsh Malvaceae Gierisch globemallow 7 7 7 nc HIGH CONCERN Ranunculaceae Actaea arizonica (S. Watson) J. Compton Arizona Buzbane 6 6 6 c Agave murpheyi F. Gibson Asparagaeeae Hohokam Agave 6 6 6 c Asnaragaceae Agave yavapaiensis Yavapai Agave 6 7 6.5 ne Aletes macdougalli ssp. macdougaftiJM. Coulto & Rose Apiaceae MacDougal's Indian parsley 6 6 6 nc Alide/la cliffordii J.M. Potter Polernoniaceae Clifford's Gilia 5 7 6 nc Antic/ea vaginata Rydb.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Gap Ranch Biological Resource Evaluation
    RED GAP RANCH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE EVALUATION Prepared for: Southwest Ground-water Consultants, Inc. Prepared by: WestLand Resources, Inc. Date: February 14, 2014 Project No.: 1822.01 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................ 1 2. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT AND BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................... 2 2.1. Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Physical Environment ................................................................................................................... 2 2.3. Biological Environment and Resources ....................................................................................... 3 3. SCREENING ANALYSIS FOR SPECIES OF CONCERN ................................................................ 5 3.1. Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2. Screening Analysis Results .......................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1. USFWS-listed Species ...................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2. USFS Coconino National Forest Sensitive Species ........................................................ 15 3.2.3. USFS Management Indicator Species ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Hinterhubera, Novenia and Related
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Phylogeny of Hinterhubera, Novenia and related genera based on the nuclear ribosomal (nr) DNA sequence data (Asteraceae: Astereae) Vesna Karaman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Karaman, Vesna, "Phylogeny of Hinterhubera, Novenia and related genera based on the nuclear ribosomal (nr) DNA sequence data (Asteraceae: Astereae)" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2200. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2200 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. PHYLOGENY OF HINTERHUBERA, NOVENIA AND RELATED GENERA BASED ON THE NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL (nr) DNA SEQUENCE DATA (ASTERACEAE: ASTEREAE) A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Vesna Karaman B.S., University of Kiril and Metodij, 1992 M.S., University of Belgrade, 1997 May 2006 "Treat the earth well: it was not given to you by your parents, it was loaned to you by your children. We do not inherit the Earth from our Ancestors, we borrow it from our Children." Ancient Indian Proverb ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to many people who have contributed to the work of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Evaluation Baseline Hydrologic & Geotechnical Data Gathering Activities on Tonto National Forest ______Resolution Copper Mining
    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION BASELINE HYDROLOGIC & GEOTECHNICAL DATA GATHERING ACTIVITIES ON TONTO NATIONAL FOREST ______________________________ RESOLUTION COPPER MINING Prepared for: USDA FOREST SERVICE TONTO NATIONAL FOREST Globe Ranger District Pinal County, Arizona Contact Person: MARK TAYLOR FOREST MINERALS BIOLOGIST 5140 E. Ingram Street Mesa, Arizona 85205 Prepared by: 4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive Tucson, Arizona 85712 June 2014 Project No. 0807.90 02 03-0340 Baseline Activities – Biological Evaluation Resolution Copper Mining TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE .................................................................................................... 3 2. PROJECT LOCATION ........................................................................................................................ 3 3. PROPOSED ACTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 4. PROPOSED ACTION AREA DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 4 4.1. Physical Environment ................................................................................................................... 4 4.2. Land Use ....................................................................................................................................... 4 4.3. Aquatic and Riparian Resources ................................................................................................... 5 4.4. Vegetation Communities and Major
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive Species List
    NAVAJO NATION SENSITIVE SPECIES LIST MAMMALS Castor canadensis American Beaver Euderma maculatum Spotted Bat Eumops perotis Western Bonneted Bat Lasionycteris noctivagans Silver-haired Bat Microtus pennsylvanicus Meadow Vole Mustela vison Mink Neotoma lepida Desert Woodrat Notiosorex crawfordi Crawford’s Desert Shrew Ovis canadensis1 Bighorn Sheep Perognathus longimembris Little Pocket Mouse Peromyscus eremicus Cactus Mouse Puma concolor Mountain Lion Sciurus aberti Abert's Squirrel Sigmodon fulviventer Tawny-bellied Cotton Rat Sorex merriami Merriam’s Shrew Sorex monticolus Montane Shrew Sorex vagrans Vagrant Shrew BIRDS Actitis macularia Spotted Sandpiper Aechmophorus occidentalis Western Grebe Aimophila ruficeps Rufous-crowned Sparrow Anas acuta Northern Pintail Anas crecca Green-Winged Teal Anas cyanoptera Cinnamon Teal Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron Asio otus Long-Eared Owl Buteo swainsoni Swainson's Hawk Butorides virescens Green Heron Callipepla squamata Scaled Quail Catharus ustulatus Swainson’s Thrush Certhia americana Brown Creeper Circus cyaneus Northern Harrier Cistothorus palustris Marsh Wren Falco peregrinus Peregrine Falcon Gallinago delicata Wilson’s Snipe Geococcyx californianus Greater Roadrunner Geothlypis trichas Common Yellowthroat Hirundo rustica Barn Swallow Icteria virens Yellow-breasted Chat Icterus cucullatus Hooded Oriole Megascops kennicottii Western Screech-Owl Mergus merganser Common Merganser Myadestes townsendi Townsend’s Solitaire Nycticorax nycticorax Black-Crowned Night-Heron Pandion haliaetus Osprey
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Name (Heading 1)
    Botany Specialists Report Travel Management Travel Management Rule Botany Specialist’s Report for: Travel Management Rule Coconino National Forest Prepared by: Debra L. Crisp _____________________________________________ September 17, 2008 Botanist Coconino National Forest Reviewed by: Barbara G. Phillips _____________________________________________ September 17, 2008 Zone Botanist, Coconino, Kaibab and Prescott National Forests Revised January 27, 2010 Travel Management Botany Specialists Report Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Regulatory Direction ................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology for Analysis ............................................................................................................. 1 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences .............................................................. 3 Noxious or invasive weeds .............................................................................................................. 3 Affected Environment ................................................................................................................. 3 Environmental Consequences ...................................................................................................... 8 No Action ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona / New Mexico Mountains Ecoregion Experts Conservation Workshop
    Arizona / New Mexico Mountains Ecoregion Experts Conservation Workshop DRAFT AGENDA Day 1: Tuesday, April 8, 1997 9:00 Welcome, Introductions, and Opening Remarks Dennis Donald 9:15 Overview of TNC Ecoregional Planning Gary Bell 9:30 Arizona/ New Mexico Mountains Ecoregion Plan Gary Bell 9:45 Function and Goals of the Experts Workshop Gary Bell 10:00 Workshop Instructions: Materials Available Site Selection Criteria Data Gaps Terminology 10:45 Break 11:00 Concurrent Experts Panel Sessions: 1. Communities & Landscapes Gary Bell 2. Birds Laura McCarthy 3. Mammals Peter Warren 4. Herptiles Dave Gori 5. Fish, Aquatic invertebrates, & aquatic habitats Jeff Baumgartner 6. Invertebrates Patrick McCarthy 7. Rare Plants John Humke 12:30 Lunch (provided) 1:30 Reconvene Morning Experts Panels 2:30 Break 2:45 Continue Concurrent Experts Panel Sessions: 4:15 Break 4:30 Continue Experts Panels 5:30 Summary Session and Outline of Tomorrow's Work (Full session) 6:30 Dinner on your own Day 2: Wednesday, April 9, 1997 8:30 Introduction to the Day's Sessions: 9:00 Presentation of the Coarse Filter 9: 45 Regional Breakout Groups: 1. Merging Data and Creating Sites 10:30 Break 10:45 Regional Breakout Groups: 2. Filling In the Biodiversity Gaps 12:00 Lunch (provided) 1:00 Regional Breakout Groups: 3. Data Needs and Identification 3:00 Break 3:45 Regional Breakout Groups: 4. Management Needs and Other Issues 5:00 Workshop Wrap-up (full session) 6:00 Travel Home • ▪ ARIZONA / NEW MEXICO MOUNTAINS ECOREGION EXPERTS CONSERVATION WORKSHOP APRIL 8-9, 1997 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PARTICIPANTS Workshop Location: Howard Johnson's Hotel, 15 Hotel Circle (at Interstate 40 and Eubank, exit 165), about 6 miles east of Interstate 25), Albuquerque, NM.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Ericameria, Chrysothamnus and Related Genera (Asteraceae : Astereae) Based on Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Sequence Data Roland P
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2002 Phylogeny of Ericameria, Chrysothamnus and related genera (Asteraceae : Astereae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence data Roland P. Roberts Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Roberts, Roland P., "Phylogeny of Ericameria, Chrysothamnus and related genera (Asteraceae : Astereae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence data" (2002). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3881. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3881 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. PHYLOGENY OF ERICAMERIA, CHRYSOTHAMNUS AND RELATED GENERA (ASTERACEAE: ASTEREAE) BASED ON NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA SEQUENCE DATA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of Biological Sciences by Roland P. Roberts B.S.Ed., Southwest Texas State University, 1991 M.S., Southwest Texas State University, 1996 December, 2002 DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to my son Roland H. Roberts, my mother Rosetta Roberts and my niece Colleen Roberts, for being a continued source of mutual love and respect. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation was developed under the direction of my advisor, Dr. Lowell E. Urbatsch, Director of the Louisiana State University Herbarium and Associate Professor in the Department of Biological Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Coconino National Forest
    Chapter 1: Introduction In Ecological and Biological Diversity of National Forests in Region 3 Bruce Vander Lee, Ruth Smith, and Joanna Bate The Nature Conservancy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We summarized existing regional-scale biological and ecological assessment information from Arizona and New Mexico for use in the development of Forest Plans for the eleven National Forests in USDA Forest Service Region 3 (Region 3). Under the current Planning Rule, Forest Plans are to be strategic documents focusing on ecological, economic, and social sustainability. In addition, Region 3 has identified restoration of the functionality of fire-adapted systems as a central priority to address forest health issues. Assessments were selected for inclusion in this report based on (1) relevance to Forest Planning needs with emphasis on the need to address ecosystem diversity and ecological sustainability, (2) suitability to address restoration of Region 3’s major vegetation systems, and (3) suitability to address ecological conditions at regional scales. We identified five assessments that addressed the distribution and current condition of ecological and biological diversity within Region 3. We summarized each of these assessments to highlight important ecological resources that exist on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico: • Extent and distribution of potential natural vegetation types in Arizona and New Mexico • Distribution and condition of low-elevation grasslands in Arizona • Distribution of stream reaches with native fish occurrences in Arizona • Species richness and conservation status attributes for all species on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico • Identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation from Ecoregional Assessments from Arizona and New Mexico Analyses of available assessments were completed across all management jurisdictions for Arizona and New Mexico, providing a regional context to illustrate the biological and ecological importance of National Forests in Region 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants for Northern Arizona Landscapes Draft A
    NATIVE PLANTS FOR NORTHERN ARIZONA LANDSCAPES DRAFT A Janice Busco, Horticulturist Cheryl Casey, Assistant Horticulturist Copyright July 27, 2000 The Arboretum at Flagstaff 4001 South Woody Mountain Road Flagstaff, AZ 86001 (520) 774-1442 www.thearb.org 1 HOW TO PRACTICE ENVIRONMENTAL HORTICULTURE Environmental horticulture utilizes an understanding and awareness of your site and the native plants available to you and the landscape features and gardening techniques which will collect and preserve water resources. This approach allows for both natural reproduction of plants and their establishment in the landscape. 1. Know your site, its seasonal fluctuations, natural weather cycles and microclimates. 2. Know the plants and features already present on your site. 3. Use water harvesting techniques—cistern, channeling and contours, planting rings, low spots, etc. 4. Use rocks and mulches to conserve and collect water. 5. Use some higher-water using plants to create shade and create protected zones of higher humidity. 6. Visit natural areas with like microclimates to your site and see how, where and in what combinations native plants occur. Look at native plant gardens and see what you like and what works. Once you know your site and its microclimates, you can use native plants from many different habitats in your landscape. 7. Create a healthy, open soil. Use organic soil amendments such as compost and composted manure tilled into the soil to create an open soil, which will allow water to enter. Organic matter will also help cindery and excessively drained soils hold water. 8. Plant with the seasons. Usually, this means waiting for the monsoon season.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora of the Lower San Francisco Volcanic Field, Coconino County, Arizona Author(S): Kyle Christie Source: Madroño, 55(1):1-14
    Vascular Flora of the Lower San Francisco Volcanic Field, Coconino County, Arizona Author(s): Kyle Christie Source: Madroño, 55(1):1-14. Published By: California Botanical Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3120/0024-9637(2008)55[1:VFOTLS]2.0.CO;2 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/ full/10.3120/0024-9637%282008%2955%5B1%3AVFOTLS%5D2.0.CO%3B2 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. MADRON˜ O, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 1–14, 2008 VASCULAR FLORA OF THE LOWER SAN FRANCISCO VOLCANIC FIELD, COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA KYLE CHRISTIE Deaver Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5640 [email protected] ABSTRACT The San Francisco Volcanic Field lies near the southern edge of the Colorado Plateau in north- central Arizona, and is dominated by an extensive Pinyon-Juniper woodland.
    [Show full text]