Golf Courses
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Aviation Activity Forecasts BOWERS FIELD AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts BOWERS FIELD AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts The overall goal of aviation activity forecasting is to prepare forecasts that accurately reflect current conditions, relevant historic trends, and provide reasonable projections of future activity, which can be translated into specific airport facility needs anticipated during the next twenty years and beyond. Introduction This chapter provides updated forecasts of aviation activity for Kittitas County Airport – Bowers Field (ELN) for the twenty-year master plan horizon (2015-2035). The most recent FAA-approved aviation activity forecasts for Bowers Field were prepared in 2011 for the Airfield Needs Assessment project. Those forecasts evaluated changes in local conditions and activity that occurred since the previous master plan forecasts were prepared in 2000, and re-established base line conditions. The Needs Assessment forecasts provide the “accepted” airport-specific projections that are most relevant for comparison with the new master plan forecasts prepared for this chapter. The forecasts presented in this chapter are consistent with Bowers Field’s current and historic role as a community/regional general aviation airport. Bowers Field is the only airport in Kittitas County capable of accommodating a full range of general aviation activity, including business class turboprops and business jets. This level of capability expands the airport’s role to serve the entire county and the local Ellensburg community. The intent is to provide an updated set of aviation demand projections for Bowers Field that will permit airport management to make the decisions necessary to maintain a viable, efficient, and cost-effective facility that meets the area’s air transportation needs. -
Pierce County Public Works and Utilities Brian J
Pierce County Public Works and Utilities Brian J. Ziegler, P.E. 2702 South 42nd Street, Suite 201 Director Tacoma, Washington 98409-7322 [email protected] piercecountywa.org/pwu TO: Dan Roach, Chair Pierce County Council FROM: Deb Wallace, Airport and Ferry Administrator DATE: October 28, 2014 SUBJECT: Airport Security The purpose of this briefing paper is to provide an update to Council on the status of security upgrades at Pierce County's airports. Current Situation: The Pierce County Airport and Ferry division is in the process of upgrading gate access, fencing, and security lighting at both airports. In 2015 the division will implement an Airport Watch program to increase the safety and security at each facility. The improvements are being made due to incidents which have occurred at the airports over the last several years and at the request of airport tenants. Currently both airports are fenced with restricted access gates to enhance security, although there are gaps in the fencing allowing unauthorized pedestrian entry. These gaps will be addressed in early 2015. An electronic gate is being added to the north gate at Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW) and the south gate is being outfitted with a mechanism to allow its use by those who are hearing impaired. Once that improvement is completed, 24 hour security will be implemented at TIW. Thun Field currently operates with 24 hour gate security. Prior to implementation, the airport commissions at each airport discussed airport security measures during the preceding year and staff coordinated the implementation of the security measures with airport tenants. -
National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report
National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report Location: Easton, WA Accident Number: SEA06FA139 Date & Time: 07/10/2006, 1735 PDT Registration: N40ST Aircraft: Piper PA-31-350 Aircraft Damage: Destroyed Defining Event: Injuries: 1 Fatal Flight Conducted Under: Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter - Non-scheduled Analysis While cruising en route in VFR conditions, the aircraft lost power on both engines. The pilot attempted an emergency forced landing at a nearby unpaved State airport, but after encountering a 20 mph tailwind on downwind and a 20 mph headwind on final, the aircraft impacted a tall conifer tree while about one-half mile from the approach end of the runway. The reason for the dual engine power loss was not determined. Probable Cause and Findings The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be: The loss of power in both engines for undetermined reasons while in cruise flight, leading to an attempted forced landing. Factors include unfavorable winds at the site of the forced landing, and trees off the approach end of the grass runway the pilot was attempting to land on. Page 1 of 11 Findings Occurrence #1: LOSS OF ENGINE POWER Phase of Operation: CRUISE Findings 1. (C) REASON FOR OCCURRENCE UNDETERMINED ---------- Occurrence #2: FORCED LANDING Phase of Operation: EMERGENCY DESCENT/LANDING ---------- Occurrence #3: IN FLIGHT COLLISION WITH OBJECT Phase of Operation: EMERGENCY DESCENT/LANDING Findings 2. (F) WEATHER CONDITION - UNFAVORABLE WIND 3. (F) OBJECT - TREE(S) Page 2 of 11 SEA06FA139 Factual Information HISTORY OF FLIGHT On July 10, 2006, approximately 1735 Pacific daylight time, a Piper PA-31-350, N40ST, impacted a tree about one-half mile east of Easton State Airport, Easton, Washington. -
Snohomish Basin Protection Plan
SNOHOMISH BASIN PROTECTION PLAN December 2015 Prepared by Snohomish County Surface Water Management King County Snoqualmie Watershed Forum Staff Tulalip Tribes Natural Resources Department ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Steering Committee Tulalip Tribes – Terry Williams Snohomish County – Debbie Terwilleger, Gregg Farris King County – Joan Lee Wild Fish Conservancy – Jamie Glasgow Trout Unlimited – Kate Miller Puget Sound Partnership – Susan O’Neil, Heather Cole Washington State University Extension – Kevin Zobrist U.S. Forest Service – Joe Neal Forterra – Skip Swenson Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife – Kirk Lakey Washington Department of Natural Resources – Doug McClelland City of Snohomish – Ann Stanton Project Team Snohomish County Surface Water Management staff (Ann Bylin, Mike Rustay, Denise DiSanto, Karen Stewart, Beth Liddell, and Paul Marczin), Tulalip Tribes Natural Resources staff (Daryl Williams, Morgan Ruff, and Josh Kubo), and Snoqualmie Watershed Forum staff (Beth leDoux, Janne Kaje, and Perry Falcone) with consultant assistance from Hook Environmental, Parametrix, and Anchor QEA. This project has been funded wholly or in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement PO 00J09701 to Snohomish County Public Works. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Additional match funding was provided by Snohomish County, King County, and Tulalip Tribes. Recommended Citation Snohomish County Surface Water Management, King County Snoqualmie Watershed Forum Staff, and Tulalip Tribes Natural Resources Department, 2015. Snohomish Basin Protection Plan. Snohomish Basin Salmon Recovery Forum. Everett, WA. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The primary goal of this 2015 Snohomish Basin Protection Plan (SBPP) is to identify protection strategies that prevent the degradation of hydrologic processes that support salmon or salmon habitat. -
An Overview of the Geology and Geomorphology of the Snoqualmie River Watershed
AN OVERVIEW OF THE GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE SNOQUALMIE RIVER WATERSHED Prepared by: John Bethel, Geologist Ecological Services Unit Prepared for: Fran Solomon, Ph.D., Senior Ecologist Watershed and Ecological Assessment Team April 2004 Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division Capital Projects and Open Space Acquisitions Section 201 South Jackson Street, Suite 600 Seattle, Washington 98104-3855 An Overview of the Geology and Geomorphology of the Snoqualmie River Watershed Prepared by John Bethel, Geologist Ecological Services Unit Prepared for King County Water and Land Resources Division Snoqualmie Watershed Team September 2004 Department of Natural Resources and Parks Water and Land Resources Division Capital Projects and Open Space Acquisitions Section 201 South Jackson Street, Suite 600 Seattle, Washington 98104-3855 King County Executive Ron Sims King County Council Carolyn Edmonds, District 1 Bob Ferguson, District 2 Kathy Lambert, District 3 Larry Phillips, District 4 Dwight Pelz, District 5 Rob McKenna, District 6 Pete von Reichbauer, District 7 Dow Constantine, District 8 Steve Hammond, District 9 Larry Gossett, District 10 Jane Hague, District 11 David Irons, District 12 Julia Patterson, District 13 Department of Natural Resources and Parks Pam Bissonnette, Director Water and Land Resources Division Daryl Grigsby, Division Director Contributing Staff John Bethel, Geologist Supporting Staff Fran Solomon, Ph.D., Senior Ecologist Terry Butler, Geologist Gino Lucchetti, Senior Ecologist Wendy Gable Collins, Graphic Designer and Cartographer Bob Gilland, Technical Information Processing Specialist AN OVERVIEW OF THE GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE SNOQUALMIE RIVER WATERSHED Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................1 1.1. Purpose and Scope of this Report .......................................................................1 1.2. -
CHAPTER 8: PARKS and OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Table of Contents
CHAPTER 8: PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Table of Contents A. INTRODUCTION: A.1 Overview A.2 Purpose of the Parks and Open Space Element A.3 Relationship to Comprehensive Plan and Regulatory Role B. DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANNING AREA: B.1 Service Area B.2 Population Trends Table 1: Population Projections Table 2: North Bend Age Distribution - 2010 B.3 Wildlife Habitat C. EXISTING AREAS AND FACILITIES: C.1 Overview C.2 City of North Bend Areas and Facilities C.3 School District Facilities C.4 City of Seattle Cedar River Watershed C.5 Si View Metropolitan Park District Facilities C.6 King County Areas and Facilities C.7 Joint Agencies Areas and Facilities C.8 Washington State Areas and Facilities C.9 Federal Lands C.10 Other Regional Areas and Facilities D. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: D.1 Introduction D.2 2012 Si View Metropolitan Parks District Survey D.3 2015 North Bend Parks Survey D.4 2015 Parks Workshop E. DEMAND AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT: E.1 Introduction E.2 Outdoor Recreation Trends E.3 Park and Recreation Needs Assessment Table 3 : Park Facility Inventory Table 4 : Park and Recreation Level of Service Standards E.4 Trail System Needs Assessment E.5 Wildlife Habitat Needs Assessment E.6 Open Space Needs Assessment F. GOALS AND POLICIES G. IMPLEMENTATION METHODS H. 20-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM: H.1 Overview H.2 Project Descriptions I. 6-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAPS: Figure 8.1: Parks, Open Space and Public Facilities Map Figure 8.2: Trail Plan Map Figure 8.3: Protected Areas Map Chapter 8 – Parks and Open Space Element Page 1 CHAPTER 8: PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT A. -
I-90 Geotour
“Excellent” –Washington Trails magazine, Geology Hikes cover story, 9/07 PHILIP FENNER 2 A Geo-Tour of the I-90 Corridor From Seattle to Vantage, WA The Mountains to Sound Greenway Text and photos by Philip Fenner V57 February 13, 2008 This document is frequently updated and expanded. The latest release is available at: http://www.seanet.com/~pfitech/I-90GeoTour.pdf ©2006 - 2008 Philip Fenner Cover photo: Mt. Si (L center) and the valley of the South Fork Snoqualmie River (R center) which I-90 follows to Snoqualmie Pass, reflected in the Mill Pond in the Snoqualmie River Valley near Snoqualmie, WA . 3 “Most men pursue pleasure with such breathless haste that they hurry past it.” Soren Kierkegaard (1813 - 1855) “Thanks to the Interstate Highway System, it is now possible to travel from coast to coast without seeing anything.” Charles Kuralt (1934 – 1997) “High-speed expressways… are noisy and frenetic, and they attract urban development like a pied piper. Unless we plan carefully, the scenic beauty, the working farms and forests, and the distinctive communities along this route could be smothered piece by piece under the next wave of urban growth.” James R. Ellis (1921 - ) “Certainly, travel is more than the seeing of sights; it is a change that goes on, deep and permanent, in the ideas of living.” Miriam Beard (1901 - 1983) “Today is your day! Your mountain is waiting. So. get on your way.” Dr. Seuss (1904 - 1991) 4 Contents Introduction................................................................................................................... 5 About the Author and This Project ............................................................................... 7 THE PUGET LOWLAND: SEATTLE TO NORTH BEND........................................ 9 The Downtown Seattle Waterfront .............................................................................. -
Regional Transportation Plan 2017-2037
Quad County Regional Transportation Planning Organization (QUADCO) Regional Transportation Plan 2017-2037 Adams, Grant, Kittitas, and Lincoln Counties Washington State Lead Agency: Lincoln County Public Works Department 27234 SR 25N, Davenport, WA 99122 509-725-7041 Adopted 12/8/2016 QUADCO 2017-2037 Regional Transportation Plan QUADCO 2017-2037 Regional Transportation Plan Quad County Regional Transportation Plan Table of Contents CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 WHAT THIS PLAN WILL ACCOMPLISH ................................................................................................................................. 1 THE COMPOSITION OF QUADCO ..................................................................................................................................... 1 QUADCO RTP REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 PREVIOUS RTP VERSIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 5 HOW THIS RTP UPDATE WAS PREPARED ........................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER TWO - MAKING OUR FUTURE VISION HAPPEN ....................................................................................... 7 QUADCO’S VISION ...................................................................................................................................................... -
Chapter 8: Parks, Recreation, Wildlife Habitat and Openspace Element
CHAPTER 8: PARKS, RECREATION, WILDLIFE HABITAT AND OPENSPACE ELEMENT Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION: Purpose of the Plan Relationship to Comprehensive Plan and Regulatory Role II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANNING AREA: Service Area Population Trends Table 1: Population Projections Table 2: North Bend Age Distribution - 2000 Wildlife Habitat III. EXISTING AREAS AND FACILITIES: Overview City of North Bend Areas and Facilities School District Facilities City of Seattle Cedar River Watershed Si View Metropolitan Park District Facilities King County Areas and Facilities Joint Agencies Areas and Facilities Washington State Areas and Facilities Federal Lands Other Regional Areas and Facilities IV. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Introduction 1999/2000 Survey 2002 Wildlife Habitat Survey 2008 Si View Metropolitan Parks District Survey 2009 Parks Commission Open House V. DEMAND AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT: Introduction Outdoor Recreation Trends Park and Recreation Needs Assessment Table 3 : Park Facility Inventory Table 4 : Park and Recreation Level of Service Standards Trail System Needs Assessment Wildlife Habitat Needs Assessment Chapter 8 – Parks, Recreation, Wildlife Habitat and Open Space Element Page 1 Adopted January 19, 2010, with updates adopted May 6, 2014, Ordinance 1526. Open Space Needs Assessment VI. GOALS AND POLICIES: Overview Goals and policies VII. IMPLEMENTATION METHODS: Methods VIII. CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM: Overview Project Descriptions Table 5: 2010-2015 Park Capital Facilities Plan MAPS: Figure 8-1: 2002 Parks, Open Space and Public Facilities Map Figure 8-2: Trail Plan Map Figure 8-3: Protected Areas Map I. INTRODUCTION The Parks, Recreation, Wildlife Habitat and Open Space Plan ("the Plan") is a six-year plan that is an element of the City of North Bend's Comprehensive Plan. -
CHAPTER 8: PARKS and OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Table of Contents
CHAPTER 8: PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Table of Contents A. INTRODUCTION: A.1 Overview A.2 Purpose of the Parks and Open Space Element A.3 Relationship to Comprehensive Plan and Regulatory Role B. DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANNING AREA: B.1 Service Area B.2 Population Trends Table 1: Population Projections Table 2: North Bend Age Distribution - 2010 B.3 Wildlife Habitat C. EXISTING AREAS AND FACILITIES: C.1 Overview C.2 City of North Bend Areas and Facilities C.3 School District Facilities C.4 City of Seattle Cedar River Watershed C.5 Si View Metropolitan Park District Facilities C.6 King County Areas and Facilities C.7 Joint Agencies Areas and Facilities C.8 Washington State Areas and Facilities C.9 Federal Lands C.10 Other Regional Areas and Facilities D. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: D.1 Introduction D.2 2012 Si View Metropolitan Parks District Survey D.3 2015 North Bend Parks Survey D.4 2015 Parks Workshop E. DEMAND AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT: E.1 Introduction E.2 Outdoor Recreation Trends E.3 Park and Recreation Needs Assessment Table 3 : Park Facility Inventory Table 4 : Park and Recreation Level of Service Standards E.4 Trail System Needs Assessment E.5 Wildlife Habitat Needs Assessment E.6 Open Space Needs Assessment F. GOALS AND POLICIES G. IMPLEMENTATION METHODS H. 20-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM: H.1 Overview H.2 Project Descriptions I. 6-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN MAPS: Figure 8.1: Parks, Open Space and Public Facilities Map Figure 8.2: Trail Plan Map Figure 8.3: Protected Areas Map Chapter 8 – Parks and Open Space Element Page 1 CHAPTER 8: PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT A. -
KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze Zestawienie Zawiera 8372 Kody Lotnisk
KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze zestawienie zawiera 8372 kody lotnisk. Zestawienie uszeregowano: Kod ICAO = Nazwa portu lotniczego = Lokalizacja portu lotniczego AGAF=Afutara Airport=Afutara AGAR=Ulawa Airport=Arona, Ulawa Island AGAT=Uru Harbour=Atoifi, Malaita AGBA=Barakoma Airport=Barakoma AGBT=Batuna Airport=Batuna AGEV=Geva Airport=Geva AGGA=Auki Airport=Auki AGGB=Bellona/Anua Airport=Bellona/Anua AGGC=Choiseul Bay Airport=Choiseul Bay, Taro Island AGGD=Mbambanakira Airport=Mbambanakira AGGE=Balalae Airport=Shortland Island AGGF=Fera/Maringe Airport=Fera Island, Santa Isabel Island AGGG=Honiara FIR=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGH=Honiara International Airport=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGI=Babanakira Airport=Babanakira AGGJ=Avu Avu Airport=Avu Avu AGGK=Kirakira Airport=Kirakira AGGL=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova Airport=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova, Santa Cruz Island AGGM=Munda Airport=Munda, New Georgia Island AGGN=Nusatupe Airport=Gizo Island AGGO=Mono Airport=Mono Island AGGP=Marau Sound Airport=Marau Sound AGGQ=Ontong Java Airport=Ontong Java AGGR=Rennell/Tingoa Airport=Rennell/Tingoa, Rennell Island AGGS=Seghe Airport=Seghe AGGT=Santa Anna Airport=Santa Anna AGGU=Marau Airport=Marau AGGV=Suavanao Airport=Suavanao AGGY=Yandina Airport=Yandina AGIN=Isuna Heliport=Isuna AGKG=Kaghau Airport=Kaghau AGKU=Kukudu Airport=Kukudu AGOK=Gatokae Aerodrome=Gatokae AGRC=Ringi Cove Airport=Ringi Cove AGRM=Ramata Airport=Ramata ANYN=Nauru International Airport=Yaren (ICAO code formerly ANAU) AYBK=Buka Airport=Buka AYCH=Chimbu Airport=Kundiawa AYDU=Daru Airport=Daru -
Easton State Airport Airport Layout Plan Report
EASTON STATE AIRPORT AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN REPORT FINAL REPORT WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AVIATION DIVISION WSDOT AVIATION | EASTON ALP Easton State Airport Airport Layout Plan Report Prepared for Washington State Department of Transportation Aviation Division Roger Millar, AICP K. Metcalf Marshall Elizer Secretary Deputy Secretary Assistant Secretary for Multi-Modal Development and Delivery (M2D2) Community Development & Economic Development David Fleckenstein Director of Aviation G. Paul Wolf State Airports Manager Final Print May 2018 (re-issued 2015 Report) Prepared by Century West Engineering 421 North Pearl Street, Suite 206 Ellensburg, Washington 98926 (509) 933-2477 www.centurywest.com MAY 2018 i WSDOT AVIATION | EASTON ALP Washington State Department of Transportation Aviation Division Motto Innovative leadership in state aeronautics Mission Statement WSDOT Aviation fosters the development of aeronautics and the state’s aviation system to support sustainable communities and statewide economic vitality. Vision To consistently provide innovative leadership in state aeronautics. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information Materials can be provided in alternative formats by calling the ADA Compliance Manager at 360-705-7097. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact that number via the Washington Relay Service at 7-1-1. Title VI Notice to the Public It is Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) policy to ensure no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities.