DOCSLIB.ORG

Physics71-80-1.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Physics71-80-1.Pdf NOBEL LECTURES I NCLUDING P RESENTATION S PEECHES AND LAUREATES' BIOGRAPHIES PHYSICS 1971-1980 E DITOR STIG LUNDQVIST Published for the Nobel Foundation in 1992 by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. P O Box 128, Farrer Road, Singapore 9128 USA Office: Suite 1B, 1060 Main Street, River Edge, NJ 07661 UK office: 73 Lynton Mead, Totteridge, London N20 8DH First published 1992 First reprint 1994 NOBEL LECTURES IN PHYSICS (1971-1980) All rights reserved ISBN 981-02-0726-3 981-02-0727-1 (pbk) Printed in Singapore. NOBEL LECTURES I NCLUDING P RESENTATION S PEECHES A ND L AUREATES B IOGRAPHIES PHYSICS CHEMISTRY PHYSIOLOGY OR MEDICINE LITERATURE PEACE ECONOMIC SCIENCES NOBEL LECTURES IN PHYSICS 1971-1980 Foreword Since 1901 the Nobel Foundation has published annually “Les Prix Nobel” with reports from the Nobel Award Ceremonies in Stockholm and Oslo as well as the biographies and Nobel lectures of the laureates. In order to make the lectures available to people with special interests in the different prize fields the Foundation gave Elsevier Publishing Company the right to publish in English the lectures for 1910-1970, which were published in 1964-1972 through the following volumes: Physics 1901-1970 4 vols. Chemistry 1901-1970 4 vols. Physiology or Medicine 1901-1970 4 vols. Literature 1910-1967 1 vol. Peace 1910-1970 3 vols. Elsevier decided later not to continue the Nobel project. It is therefore with great satisfaction that the Nobel Foundation has given World Scientific Publishing Company the right to bring the series up to date. The Nobel Foundation is very pleased that the intellectual and spiritual message to the world laid down in the laureates’ lectures will, thanks to the efforts of World Scientific, reach new readers all over the world. Lars Gyllensten Stig Ramel Chairman of the Board Executive Director Stockholm, June 1991 vii PREFACE The Nobel Foundation publishes annually the proceedings of the year’s Prize ceremonies in a volume called Les Prix Nobel. It contains the speeches given at the prize ceremony, the autobiography of each laureate as well as the Nobel Lecture. These books contain much material of great interest to the scientific community. However, they are printed only in a small number of copies, very few scientists even know that they exist and there is no advertisement. From 1992 the material is now becoming available through a deal between the Nobel Foundation and World Scientific to publish the material from the 70’s and the 80’s in a series of volumes. This volume contains the materials in physics for the period 1970-1979. The contents in this volume are not identical with the original in Les Prix Nobel. We have written to all the physics laureates and let them modify and update the material. The reader may be surprised about the very short speeches of presentation. The reason is that only a few minutes are allotted to these speeches which did not permit any description of the discovery. Stig Lundqvist ix CONTENTS Foreword V Preface vii 1971 DENIS GABOR 1 Presentation by Erik Ingelstam 3 Biography of Denis Gabor 7 Holography, 1948 -1971 11 1972 JOHN BARDEEN, LEON N COOPER and J ROBERT SCHRIEFFER 45 Presentation by Stig Lundqvist 47 Biography of John Bardeen 51 Electron-Phonon Interactions and Superconductivity 54 Biography of Leon N Cooper 71 Microscopic Quantum Interference Effects in the Theory of Superconductivity 73 Biography of J Robert Schrieffer 95 Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena from Pairing in Superconductors 97 1973 LEO ESAKI, IVAR GIAEVER and BRIAN D JOSEPHSON 109 Presentation by Stig Lundqvist 111 Biography of Leo Esaki 115 Long Journey into Tunneling 116 Biography of Ivar Giaever 135 Electron Tunneling and Superconductivity 137 Biography of Brian D Josephson 155 The Discovery of Tunnelling Supercurrents 157 x Contents 1974 MARTIN RYLE and ANTONY HEWISH 165 Presentation by Hans Wilhelmsson 167 Biography of Antony Hewish 171 Pulsars and High Density Physics 174 Biography of Martin Ryle 185 Radio Telescopes of Large Resolving Power 187 1975 AAGE BOHR, BEN R MOTTELSON and JAMES RAINWATER 205 Presentation by Sven Johansson 207 Biography of Aage Bohr 211 Rotational Motion in Nuclei 213 Biography of Ben R Mottelson 235 Elementary Modes of Excitation in the Nucleus 236 Biography of James Rainwater 257 Background for the Spheroidal Nuclear Model Proposal 259 1976 BURTON RICHTER and SAMUEL C C TING 271 Presentation by Gösta Ekspong 273 Biography of Burton Richter 277 From the Psi to Charm -The Experiments of 1975 and 1976 281 Biography of Samuel Chao Chung Ting 313 The Discovery of the J Particle: A Personal Collection 316 1977 PHILIP W ANDERSON, NEVILL F MOTT and JOHN H VAN VLECK 345 Presentation by Per-Olov Löwdin 347 Biography of John Hasbrouck Van Vleck 351 Quantum Mechanics : The Key to Understanding Magnetism 353 Biography of Philip W Anderson 371 Local Moments and Localized States 376 Biography of Nevill Francis Mott 401 Electrons in Glass 403 1978 PETER LEONIDOVITCH KAPITZA, ARNO A PENZIAS and ROBERT W WILSON 415 Presentation by Lamek Hulthén 417 xi Biography of Peter Leonidovitch Kapitza 421 Plasma and the Controlled Thermonuclear Reaction 424 Biography of Arno A Penzias 439 The Origin of Elements 444 Biography of Robert W Wilson 459 The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation 463 1979 SHELDON L GLASHOW, ABDUS SALAM and STEVEN WEINBERG 485 Presentation by Bengt Nagel 487 Biography of Sheldon Lee Glashow 491 Towards a Unified Theory - Threads in a Tapestry 494 Biography of Abdus Salam 507 Gauge Unification of Fundamental Forces 513 Biography of Steven Weinberg 541 Conceptual Foundations of the Unified Theory of Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions 543 1980 JAMES W CRONIN and VAL L FITCH 561 Presentation by Costa Ekspong 563 Biography of James W Cronin 567 CP Symmetry Violation - The Search for Its Origin 570 Biography of Val Logsdon Fitch 591 The Discovery of Charge-Conjugation Parity Symmetry 594 Physics 1971 DENNIS GABOR for his invention and development of the holographic method THE NOBEL PRIZE FOR PHYSICS Speech by professor ERIK INGELSTAM of the Royal Academy of Sciences Translation Your Majesty, Your Royal Highnesses, Ladies and Gentlemen, Our five senses give us knowledge of our surroundings, and nature herself has many available resources. The most obvious is light which gives us the possibility to see and to be pleased by colour and shape. Sound conveys the speech with which we communicate with each other and it also allows us to experience the tone-world of music. Light and sound are wave motions which give us information not only on the sources from which they originate, but also on the bodies through which they pass, and against which they are reflected or deflected. But light and sound are only two examples of waves which carry information, and they cover only very small parts of the electromagnetic and acoustic spectra to which our eyes and ears are sensitive. Physicists and technologists are working continuously to improve and broaden the methods and instruments which give us knowledge about waves which lie outside our direct perception capacity. The electron microscope re- solves structures which are a thousand times smaller than the wavelength of visible light. The photographic plate preserves for us a picture of a fleeting moment, which perhaps we may make use of over a long time period for measurements, or it transforms a wave-field of heat rays, X rays, or electron rays to a visible image. And yet, important information about the object is missing in a photo- graphic image. This is a problem which has been a key one for Dennis Gabor during his work on information theory. Because the image reproduces only the effect of the intensity of the incident wave-field, not its nature. The other characteristic quantity of the waves, phase, is lost and thereby the three dimensional geometry. The phase depends upon from which direction the wave is coming and how far it has travelled from the object to be imaged. Gabor found the solution to the problem of how one can retain a wave-field with its phase on a photographic plate. A part of the wave-field, upon which the object has not had an effect, namely a reference wave, is allowed to fall on the plate together with the wave-field from the object. These two fields are superimposed upon one another, they interfere, and give the strongest il- lumination where they have the same phase, the weakest where they ex- tinguish each other by having the opposite phase. Gabor called this plate a hologram, from the Greek holos, which means whole or complete, since the plate contains the whole information. This information is stored in the plate in a coded form. When the hologram is irradiated only with the reference wave, this wave is deflected in the hologram structure, and the original ob- 4 Physics 1971 ject’s field is reconstructed. The result is a three dimensional image. Gabor originally thought of using the principle to make an electron micro- scope image in two steps: first to register an object’s field with electron rays in a hologram, and then to reconstruct this with visible light to make a three dimensional image with high resolution. But suitable electron sources for this were not available, and also for other technical reasons the idea could not be tested. However, through successful experiments with light Gabor could show that the principle was correct. In three papers from 1948 to 1951 he attained an exact analysis of the method, and his equations, even today, con- tain all the necessary information. Holography, as this area of science is called, made its break-through when the tool, which had so far been missing, became available, namely the laser as a light source.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2007 Abstracts Und Curricula Bewusstsein Und Quantencomputer
    BEWUSSTSEIN UND QUANTENCOMPUTER CONSCIOUSNESS AND QUANTUMCOMPUTERS ______________________________________________________________ 7. SCHWEIZER BIENNALE ZU WISSENSCHAFT, TECHNIK + ÄSTHETIK THE 7th SWISS BIENNIAL ON SCIENCE, TECHNICS + AESTHETICS 20. / 21. Januar 2007 / January 20 - 21, 2007 Verkehrshaus der Schweiz, Luzern Swiss Museum of Transport, Lucerne Veranstalter: Neue Galerie Luzern, www.neugalu.ch Organized by: New Gallery Lucerne, www.neugalu.ch ______________________________________________________________ A B S T R A C T S Samstag, 20. Januar 2007 / Saturday, January 20, 2007 Verkehrshaus der Schweiz / Swiss Museum of Transport Keynote 12.15 - 12.45 BRIAN JOSEPHSON Quantenphysik Cambridge / UK IS QUANTUM MECHANICS OR COMPUTATION MORE FUNDAMENTAL? IST DIE QUANTENMECHANIK ODER DAS RECHNEN FUNDAMENTALER? Is quantum mechanics as currently conceived the ultimate theory of nature? In his book "Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge", Niels Bohr argued that because of the uncertainty principle quantum methodology might not be applicable to the study of the ultimate details of life. Delbruck disagreed, claiming that biosystems are robust to quantum disturbances, an assertion that is only partially valid rendering Bohr's argument still significant, even though normally ignored. The methods of the quantum physicist and of the biological sciences can be seen to involve two alternative approaches to the understanding of nature that can usefully complement each other, neither on its own containing the full story. That full story, taking into
    [Show full text]
  • Famous Physicists Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh
    Fun Quiz FAMOUS PHYSICISTS HIMANSU SEKHAR FATESINGH 1. The first woman to 6. He first succeeded in receive the Nobel Prize in producing the nuclear physics was chain reaction. a. Maria G. Mayer a. Otto Hahn b. Irene Curie b. Fritz Strassmann c. Marie Curie c. Robert Oppenheimer d. Lise Meitner d. Enrico Fermi 2. Who first suggested electron 7. The credit for discovering shells around the nucleus? electron microscope is often a. Ernest Rutherford attributed to b. Neils Bohr a. H. Germer c. Erwin Schrödinger b. Ernst Ruska d. Wolfgang Pauli c. George P. Thomson d. Clinton J. Davisson 8. The wave theory of light was 3. He first measured negative first proposed by charge on an electron. a. Christiaan Huygens a. J. J. Thomson b. Isaac Newton b. Clinton Davisson c. Hermann Helmholtz c. Louis de Broglie d. Augustin Fresnel d. Robert A. Millikan 9. He was the first scientist 4. The existence of quarks was to find proof of Einstein’s first suggested by theory of relativity a. Max Planck a. Edwin Hubble b. Sheldon Glasgow b. George Gamow c. Murray Gell-Mann c. S. Chandrasekhar d. Albert Einstein d. Arthur Eddington 10. The credit for development of the cyclotron 5. The phenomenon of goes to: superconductivity was a. Carl Anderson b. Donald Glaser discovered by c. Ernest O. Lawrence d. Charles Wilson a. Heike Kamerlingh Onnes b. Alex Muller c. Brian D. Josephson 11. Who first proposed the use of absolute scale d. John Bardeen of Temperature? a. Anders Celsius b. Lord Kelvin c. Rudolf Clausius d.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize Winners Part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin
    Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize winners part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin By Cambridge News | Posted: January 18, 2016 By Adam Care The News has been rounding up all of Cambridge's 92 Nobel Laureates, celebrating over 100 years of scientific and social innovation. ADVERTISING In this installment we move from 1951 to 1974, a period which saw a host of dramatic breakthroughs, in biology, atomic science, the discovery of pulsars and theories of global trade. It's also a period which saw The Eagle pub come to national prominence and the appearance of the first female name in Cambridge University's long Nobel history. The Gender Pay Gap Sale! Shop Online to get 13.9% off From 8 - 11 March, get 13.9% off 1,000s of items, it highlights the pay gap between men & women in the UK. Shop the Gender Pay Gap Sale – now. Promoted by Oxfam 1. 1951 Ernest Walton, Trinity College: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei 2. 1951 John Cockcroft, St John's / Churchill Colleges: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei Walton and Cockcroft shared the 1951 physics prize after they famously 'split the atom' in Cambridge 1932, ushering in the nuclear age with their particle accelerator, the Cockcroft-Walton generator. In later years Walton returned to his native Ireland, as a fellow of Trinity College Dublin, while in 1951 Cockcroft became the first master of Churchill College, where he died 16 years later. 3. 1952 Archer Martin, Peterhouse: Nobel Prize in Chemistry, for developing partition chromatography 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Antony Hewish
    PULSARS AND HIGH DENSITY PHYSICS Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1974 by A NTONY H E W I S H University of Cambridge, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, England D ISCOVERY OF P U L S A R S The trail which ultimately led to the first pulsar began in 1948 when I joined Ryle’s small research team and became interested in the general problem of the propagation of radiation through irregular transparent media. We are all familiar with the twinkling of visible stars and my task was to understand why radio stars also twinkled. I was fortunate to have been taught by Ratcliffe, who first showed me the power of Fourier techniques in dealing with such diffraction phenomena. By a modest extension of existing theory I was able to show that our radio stars twinkled because of plasma clouds in the ionosphere at heights around 300 km, and I was also able to measure the speed of ionospheric winds in this region (1) . My fascination in using extra-terrestrial radio sources for studying the intervening plasma next brought me to the solar corona. From observations of the angular scattering of radiation passing through the corona, using simple radio interferometers, I was eventually able to trace the solar atmo- sphere out to one half the radius of the Earth’s orbit (2). In my notebook for 1954 there is a comment that, if radio sources were of small enough angular size, they would illuminate the solar atmosphere with sufficient coherence to produce interference patterns at the Earth which would be detectable as a very rapid fluctuation of intensity.
    [Show full text]
  • From Theory to the First Working Laser Laser History—Part I
    I feature_ laser history From theory to the first working laser Laser history—Part I Author_Ingmar Ingenegeren, Germany _The principle of both maser (microwave am- 19 US patents) using a ruby laser. Both were nom- plification by stimulated emission of radiation) inated for the Nobel Prize. Gábor received the 1971 and laser (light amplification by stimulated emis- Nobel Prize in Physics for the invention and devel- sion of radiation) were first described in 1917 by opment of the holographic method. To a friend he Albert Einstein (Fig.1) in “Zur Quantentheorie der wrote that he was ashamed to get this prize for Strahlung”, as the so called ‘stimulated emission’, such a simple invention. He was the owner of more based on Niels Bohr’s quantum theory, postulated than a hundred patents. in 1913, which explains the actions of electrons in- side atoms. Einstein (born in Germany, 14 March In 1954 at the Columbia University in New York, 1879–18 April 1955) received the Nobel Prize for Charles Townes (born in the USA, 28 July 1915–to- physics in 1921, and Bohr (born in Denmark, 7 Oc- day, Fig. 2) and Arthur Schawlow (born in the USA, tober 1885–18 November 1962) in 1922. 5 Mai 1921–28 April 1999, Fig. 3) invented the maser, using ammonia gas and microwaves which In 1947 Dennis Gábor (born in Hungarian, 5 led to the granting of a patent on March 24, 1959. June 1900–8 February 1972) developed the theory The maser was used to amplify radio signals and as of holography, which requires laser light for its re- an ultra sensitive detector for space research.
    [Show full text]
  • “Kings of Cool” Superconductivity Who Are These People? SUPERCONDUCTORS
    “““Kings of Cool” Superconductivity Who are these people? SUPERCONDUCTORS An Introduction by Prof George Walmsley Normal conductor eg copper • Current, I. • Voltage drop, V. • Resistance, R = ? • Ans: V/I = R eg 2 Volts/1 Amp = 2 Ohms I Copper I V Normal conductor eg copper • Source of resistance: • Electron collides with lattice ion to produce heat (phonon). Copper lattice Lower Temperature • What happens when we cool a metal? • Ans 1: The electrons slow down and current is reduced maybe to zero. R→∞ • Ans 2: The lattice stops vibrating and resistance disappears. R=0 How do we cool things? • Commonly used liquid refrigerants: Element Boiling Pt Oxygen 90K Nitrogen 77K Hydrogen 20K Helium 4.2K Thomas Andrews, Chemist • 9 Dec 1813 – 26 Nov 1885 • John (Flax spinner, Comber) [ggfather] • Michael (Linen, Ardoyne) [gfather] • Thomas (Linen merchant) [father] • Studied under James Thomson, RBAI • 1828 Univ of Glasgow, Thos Thomson • 1830 Paris, Dumas • 1830-34 Trinity College Dublin • 1835 MD U of Edinburgh • 1835-45 Prof of Chemistry RBAI • 1845 Vice-President, Queen’s College • 1847 Prof of Chemistry, Queen’s College • 1869 Bakerian Lecture on CO 2 • 1871 Visit by Dr Janssen of Leiden • Photo: Paris 1875 Andrews’ Isotherms • Note critical temperature NORMAL CONDUCTOR: Electrical properties Normal metal eg copper Resistance and (resistivity, ρ) >0 As temperature falls ρ falls smoothly too: ρ 0 100 200 273.15 Temperature/K SUPERCONDUCTOR: Electrical properties Superconductor eg mercury, lead Resistivity ( ρ) >0 like normal metal down to critical
    [Show full text]
  • Kritikens Ordning Svenska Bokrecensioner 1906, 1956, 2006
    Kritikens ordning Svenska bokrecensioner 1906, 1956, 2006 © lina samuelsson Grafisk form anita stjernlöf-lund Typografi AGaramond Papper Munken Pure Omslagets bild gertrud samén Tryck trt boktryckeri, Tallinn 2013 Förlag bild,text&form www.bildtextform.com isbn 978-91-980447-1-3 Lina Samuelsson Kritikens ordning Svenska bokrecensioner 1906, 1956, 2006 bild,text&form 7 tack 8 förkortningar 8 pseudonym- och signaturnyckel 9 inledning 10 Vad är litteraturkritik? 11 Institution – diskurs – normer 14 Tidigare forskning 1906 17 Det litterära året 18 Urval och undersökt material 21 kritikerna 1906 21 Litteraturbevakningen före kultursidan 23 Kritikerkåren 26 Litteraturen 28 Kritiken av kritiken 33 recensionerna 1906 33 Utveckling, mognad och manlighet. Författaren och verket 35 ”En verklig människa, som lefver och röres inför våra ögon”. Kritikens värderingskriterier I 38 ”Det själfupplefvdas egendomlighet och autopsi”. Kritikens värderingskriterier II 41 Vem är författare? Konstnärlighet, genus och rätten till ordet 46 För fosterlandet. Föreställningar om nationalism 50 exempelrecension 1956 56 Det litterära året 58 Urval och undersökt material 62 kritikerna 1956 62 Kultursidor och litteraturtidskrifter 66 Kritikerkåren 72 Litteraturen 75 Kampen om kritiken 79 recensionerna 1956 79 En ny och modern kritik. Verket och kritikern 82 Enkelt och äkta. Kritikens värderingskriterier I 84 Om att vara människa. Kritikens värderingskriterier II 88 ”Fem hekto nougat i lyxförpackning”. Populärlitteratur och genus 94 exempelrecension 2006 99 Det litterära året riginal 101 Urval och undersökt material 105 kritikerna 2006 105 Drakar, bloggar och tabloider 110 Kritikerkåren 116 Litteraturen 121 Kritik i kris? 125 recensionerna 2006 125 Subjektiv och auktoritär – kritikern i centrum 129 Personligt, biografiskt (och dessutom sant). Författaren och verket 134 Drabbande pageturner som man minns länge.
    [Show full text]
  • April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018
    april 17-19, 2018 The 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the a range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand United States’ oldest comprehensive science and medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this technology awards program. Each year, the Institute historic awards program. celebrates extraordinary people who are shaping our In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of world through their groundbreaking achievements these events and biographies of our 2018 laureates. in science, engineering, and business. They stand as We invite you to read about each one and to attend modern-day exemplars of our namesake, Benjamin the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, Franklin, whose impact as a statesman, scientist, all events are free, open to the public, and located in inventor, and humanitarian remains unmatched Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we celebrate his legacy, which has fueled the Institute’s We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From sparking a gene editing revolution to saving Institute Awards Week. a technology giant, from making strides toward a unified theory to discovering the flow in everything, from finding clues to climate change deep in our forests to seeing the future in a terahertz wave, and from enabling us to unplug to connecting us with the III world, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates personify the trailblazing spirit so crucial to our future with its many challenges and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics Nobel Prize 1975
    Physics Nobel Prize 1975 Nobel prize winners, left to right, A. Bohr, B. Mottelson and J. Rainwater. 0. Kofoed-Hansen (Photos Keystone Press, Photopress) Before 1949 every physicist knew that mooted, it was a major breakthrough from 1943-45. From December 1943 the atomic nucleus does not rotate. in thinking about the nucleus and he was actually in the USA. Back in The reasoning behind this erroneous opened a whole new field of research Denmark after the war, he obtained belief came from the following argu• in nuclear physics. This work has for his Ph. D. in 1954 for work on rota• ments. A quantum-mechanical rotator years been guided by the inspiration tional states in atomic nuclei. His with the moment of inertia J can take of Bohr and Mottelson. thesis was thus based on the work for up various energy levels with rota• An entire industry of nuclear which he has now been recognized at tional energies equal to h2(l + 1)| research thus began with Rainwater's the very highest level. He is Professor /8TC2J, where h is Planck's constant brief contribution to Physical Review at the Niels Bohr Institute of the ^nd I is the spin. As an example, I may in 1950 entitled 'Nuclear energy level University of Copenhagen and a nave values 0, 2, 4, ... etc. If the argument for a spheroidal nuclear member of the CERN Scientific Policy nucleus is considered as a rigid body, model'. Today a fair-sized library is Committee. then the moment of inertia J is very needed in order to contain all the Ben Mottelson was born in the USA large and the rotational energies papers written on deformed nuclei and in 1926 and has, for many years, become correspondingly very small.
    [Show full text]
  • Date: To: September 22, 1 997 Mr Ian Johnston©
    22-SEP-1997 16:36 NOBELSTIFTELSEN 4& 8 6603847 SID 01 NOBELSTIFTELSEN The Nobel Foundation TELEFAX Date: September 22, 1 997 To: Mr Ian Johnston© Company: Executive Office of the Secretary-General Fax no: 0091-2129633511 From: The Nobel Foundation Total number of pages: olO MESSAGE DearMrJohnstone, With reference to your fax and to our telephone conversation, I am enclosing the address list of all Nobel Prize laureates. Yours sincerely, Ingr BergstrSm Mailing address: Bos StU S-102 45 Stockholm. Sweden Strat itddrtSMi Suircfatan 14 Teleptelrtts: (-MB S) 663 » 20 Fsuc (*-«>!) «W Jg 47 22-SEP-1997 16:36 NOBELSTIFTELSEN 46 B S603847 SID 02 22-SEP-1997 16:35 NOBELSTIFTELSEN 46 8 6603847 SID 03 Professor Willis E, Lamb Jr Prof. Aleksandre M. Prokhorov Dr. Leo EsaJki 848 North Norris Avenue Russian Academy of Sciences University of Tsukuba TUCSON, AZ 857 19 Leninskii Prospect 14 Tsukuba USA MSOCOWV71 Ibaraki Ru s s I a 305 Japan 59* c>io Dr. Tsung Dao Lee Professor Hans A. Bethe Professor Antony Hewlsh Department of Physics Cornell University Cavendish Laboratory Columbia University ITHACA, NY 14853 University of Cambridge 538 West I20th Street USA CAMBRIDGE CB3 OHE NEW YORK, NY 10027 England USA S96 014 S ' Dr. Chen Ning Yang Professor Murray Gell-Mann ^ Professor Aage Bohr The Institute for Department of Physics Niels Bohr Institutet Theoretical Physics California Institute of Technology Blegdamsvej 17 State University of New York PASADENA, CA91125 DK-2100 KOPENHAMN 0 STONY BROOK, NY 11794 USA D anni ark USA 595 600 613 Professor Owen Chamberlain Professor Louis Neel ' Professor Ben Mottelson 6068 Margarldo Drive Membre de rinstitute Nordita OAKLAND, CA 946 IS 15 Rue Marcel-Allegot Blegdamsvej 17 USA F-92190 MEUDON-BELLEVUE DK-2100 KOPENHAMN 0 Frankrike D an m ar k 599 615 Professor Donald A.
    [Show full text]
  • De Nobelprijzen Komen Eraan!
    De Nobelprijzen komen eraan! De Nobelprijzen komen eraan! In de loop van volgende week worden de Nobelprijswinnaars van dit jaar aangekondigd. Daarna weten we wie in december deze felbegeerde prijzen in ontvangst mogen gaan nemen. De Nobelprijzen zijn wellicht de meest prestigieuze en bekende academische onderscheidingen ter wereld, maar waarom eigenlijk? Hoe zijn de prijzen ontstaan, en wie was hun grondlegger, Alfred Nobel? Afbeelding 1. Alfred Nobel.Alfred Nobel (1833-1896) was de grondlegger van de Nobelprijzen. Volgende week is de jaarlijkse aankondiging van de prijswinnaard. Alfred Nobel Alfred Nobel was een belangrijke negentiende-eeuwse Zweedse scheikundige en uitvinder. Hij werd geboren in Stockholm in 1833 in een gezin met acht kinderen. Zijn vader, Immanuel Nobel, was een werktuigkundige en uitvinder die succesvol was met het maken van wapens en stoommotoren. Immanuel wou dat zijn zonen zijn bedrijf zouden overnemen en stuurde Alfred daarom op een twee jaar durende reis naar onder andere Duitsland, Frankrijk en de Verenigde Staten, om te leren over chemische werktuigbouwkunde. In Parijs ontmoette bron: https://www.quantumuniverse.nl/de-nobelprijzen-komen-eraan Pagina 1 van 5 De Nobelprijzen komen eraan! Alfred de Italiaanse scheikundige Ascanio Sobrero, die drie jaar eerder het explosief nitroglycerine had ontdekt. Nitroglycerine had een veel grotere explosieve kracht dan het buskruit, maar was ook veel gevaarlijker om te gebruiken omdat het instabiel is. Alfred raakte geinteresseerd in nitroglycerine en hoe het gebruikt kon worden voor commerciele doeleinden, en ging daarom werken aan de stabiliteit en veiligheid van de stof. Een makkelijk project was dit niet, en meerdere malen ging het flink mis.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science
    Nuclear Science—A Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart ©2018 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP) Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science Many Nobel Prizes have been awarded for nuclear research and instrumentation. The field has spun off: particle physics, nuclear astrophysics, nuclear power reactors, nuclear medicine, and nuclear weapons. Understanding how the nucleus works and applying that knowledge to technology has been one of the most significant accomplishments of twentieth century scientific research. Each prize was awarded for physics unless otherwise noted. Name(s) Discovery Year Henri Becquerel, Pierre Discovered spontaneous radioactivity 1903 Curie, and Marie Curie Ernest Rutherford Work on the disintegration of the elements and 1908 chemistry of radioactive elements (chem) Marie Curie Discovery of radium and polonium 1911 (chem) Frederick Soddy Work on chemistry of radioactive substances 1921 including the origin and nature of radioactive (chem) isotopes Francis Aston Discovery of isotopes in many non-radioactive 1922 elements, also enunciated the whole-number rule of (chem) atomic masses Charles Wilson Development of the cloud chamber for detecting 1927 charged particles Harold Urey Discovery of heavy hydrogen (deuterium) 1934 (chem) Frederic Joliot and Synthesis of several new radioactive elements 1935 Irene Joliot-Curie (chem) James Chadwick Discovery of the neutron 1935 Carl David Anderson Discovery of the positron 1936 Enrico Fermi New radioactive elements produced by neutron 1938 irradiation Ernest Lawrence
    [Show full text]