Woodheadt. I.AJD UPON the TABLE of the HOUSE Nn.:5~1Tg)1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
tA Queensland ~ Government woodheadT. I.AJD UPON THE TABLE OF THE HOUSE Nn.:5~1Tg)1.. 2 3 .AUG 2012 ~~~~~ M~J= l:l OVl.SprMjtx>ry Preliminary lnfrastru~Ufe § ~'1'·4,Y Planning Stud :ttt~" Logan Hos .1 Volume 1 of 2 August 2010 Please note: This report contains confidential information intended for the exclusive use of Queensland Health. No confidentiality is waived or lost by mistaken transmission. Information contained within this report is valid as at the date of issue only. "PRINTED COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED" Endorsed by HIPEC-does not represent Queensland Health policy at this time About this study The Preliminary Infrastructure Planning Study for the Logan Hospital was commissioned by Queensland Health through Project Services Department of Public Works on 14 June 2010. This study investigates future infrastructure for the Logan Hospital based on the options endorsed by Queensland Health's Integrated Policy and Planning Executive Committee. This Preliminary Infrastructure Planning Study was undertaken from 1 May to 13 August 2010 and was prepared by Woodhead Pty Ltd with the assistance of Philip Chun and Associates, Ove Arup Pty Ltd, MRP Hydraulic and Fire Service Consultants Pty Ltd, Norman Disney and Young and Rider Levett Bucknell under the direction of Queensland Health's Planning and Coordination Branch. Every effort has been made by Woodhead Pty Ltd and sub-consultants to investigate and document in sufficient detail and within the timeframe, the infrastructure issues, gaps and requirements by Queensland Health in relation to the Logan Hospital's future service provision. Assumptions The options for future expansion/redevelopment of the Logan Hospital have been generated in response to service needs projected through to 2026/27. The service needs have been identified in the Queensland Health Service Activity Data Report prepared by Queensland Health. Redevelopment options have been developed to meet 2026/27 projections only. Options have not been developed for intermediate (e.g. 2016) service demands. The study has also been prepared on the basis of available information provided with regards to the condition of existing buildings and information provided in sub-consultants' reports. Another key assumption made during completion of this study includes the accuracy of information provided by external parties in regards to the existing facilities. Page 2 of 54 "PRINTED COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED" Endorsed by HIPEC-does not represent Queensland Health policy at this time Contents 1 Executive summary ............................................................................................. 7 2 Introduction ........................................ ·.................................................................. 9 2.1 Objective ......................................................................... ,...................... , ... 9 3 Study context ........................... , .................. ,..... ,.............................................. 10 :.. ; ' ' ' :'' 3.1 Locality ........................................... , ....... '.............................................. 10 3.2 Logan Hospital site ............................................................................... 10 3.3 Logan Hospital building history ............................................................. 11 3.4 Existing built environment. .................................................................... 11 3.5 Logan Hospital maintenance issues ..................................................... 17 3.6 Logan Hospital development proposals ................................................ 17 3. 7 Site constraints ..................................................................................... 17 3.7.1 Heritage issues ....................................................................... 17 3.7.2 Town planning/designation issues .......................................... 17 3.8 Consultation ......................................................................................... 17 4 Health services ................................................................................................. 17 4.1 Design and functionality of Logan Hospital ........................................... 17 4.2 Future health services .......................................................................... 17 4.3 Infrastructure gaps ............................................................................... 17 5 Inspection reports ............................................................................................ 17 5.1 Method ................................................................................................. 17 5.2 Exclusions ............................................................................................ 17 5.3 Overlap ................................................................................................. 17 5.4 Current site and infrastructure condition ............................................... 17 5.5 Building viability .................................................................................... 17 6 Current risks ..................................................................................................... 17 6.1 Building life ........................................................................................... 17 6.2 Compromised patient care .................................................................... 17 6.3 Fire ....................................................................................................... 17 6.4 Accident ............................................................................................... 17 6.5 Infection control .................................................................................... 17 6.6 Security ................................................................................................ 17 6.7 Health and safety .................................................................................. 17 6.8 Disadvantage to persons with a disability ............................................. 17 6.9 Staff, patient and visitor dissatisfaction ................................................. 17 6.10 Excessive running costs ....................................................................... 17 6.11 Failure of building services systems ..................................................... 17 Page 3of54 "PRINTED COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED" Endorsed by HIPEC--<loes not represent Queensland Health policy at this time 6.12 Legal action .......................................................................................... 17 7 Options ............................................................................................................. 17 7.1 Option 1 -Status Quo (minimum requirements) ................................... 17 7 .1.1 Scope of this option ................................................................ 17 7 .1.2 Capital cost ............................................................................. 17 7 .1.3 Whole-of-life costs .................................................................. 17 7 .1.4 Advantages ............................................................................. 17 7.1.5 Disadvantages ........................................................................ 17 7.2 Option2 ................................................................................................ 17 7 .2.1 Scope of this option ................................................................ 17 7 .2.2 Capital cost ............................................................................. 17 7.2.3 Whole-of-life costs .................................................................. 17 7 .2.4 Advantages ............................................................................. 17 7 .2.5 Disadvantages ........................................................................ 17 7.3 Option3 ................................................................................................ 17 7 .3.1 Scope of this option ................................................................ 17 7. 3.2 Capital cost ............................................................................. 17 7.3.3 Whole-of-life costs .................................................................. 17 7.3.4 Advantages ............................................................................. 17 7 .3.5 Disadvantages ........................................................................ 17 8 Options analysis ..............................................................................................17 Page 4of54 ''PRINTED COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED" Endorsed by HIPEC--<Ioes not represent Queensland Health policy at this time List of Tables Table 1: Current and future bed requirements for Logan Hospital (bed projections) ............ 17 Table 2: Staging program for Option 2 ................................................................................. 17 Table 3: Option 1 analysis ................................................................................................... 17 Table 4: Option 2 analysis ................................................................................................... 17 Table 5: Option 3 analysis ................................................................................................... 17 List of Diagrams Diagram 1: Logan Hospital existing Level 1 floor plan ......................................................... 13 Diagram 2: Logan Hospital existing Level2