DOCSLIB.ORG

Guide to Robotic Systems Safety Compliance Overview of the Robot Certification Process

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guide to Robotic Systems Safety Compliance Overview of the Robot Certification Process Guide to robotic systems safety compliance Overview of the robot certification process OVERVIEW Areas of expertise We provide testing and certification Because many robots, collaborative robots (cobots) services for the following robotic and automated mobile platforms (AMPs) work in close equipment and systems: proximity to people, certification and compliance with safety-hazard standards are essential. • 6-axis articulated robots • Palletizers UL is a trusted partner for robot manufacturers, system • Delta/PKR robots integrators and asset owners to help ensure that robotic • Linear robots systems are safe and reliable. • Cobots • Personal care robots • Automated guided vehicles (AGVs) This guide provides a comprehensive • Automated mobile platforms (AMPs) understanding of the certification process. • Storage and retrieval systems • Controllers • Grippers/end effectors • Pendants, including wireless types • Axis limiting and control devices • Welding equipment OVERVIEW Overview of relevant standards for robotics In areas as diverse as product safety, interoperability, performance, energy efficiency, functional safety and medical applications, UL helps customers meet regulatory requirements that include: ANSI/UL 1740 NFPA 79 ANSI/ISO 12100 IEC 62061 Standard for Robots and Robotic Electrical Standard for Industrial Safety of Machinery – General Principles Safety of machinery – Functional safety Equipment Machinery for Design – Risk Assessment and Risk of safety-related electrical, electronic Reduction and programmable electronic control systems ANSI/RIA R15.06 ISO 10218 Standard for Industrial Robots and Robot Robots and robotic devices – Safety EN 61508 Systems – Safety requirements requirements for industrial robots Functional safety of electrical/electronic/ HazLoc/Intrinsically Safe/ATEX programmable electronic safety-related systems CAN/CSA Z434 ISO 13482 EU Machinery Directive Standard for Industrial Robots and Robot Robots and robotic devices – Safety (2006/42/EC) Systems requirements for personal care robots ISO 13849 Safety of machinery – Safety-related parts of control systems EU EMC Directive UL 3100 (2004/108/EC) Outline of Investigation for Automated Mobile Platforms (AMPs) OVERVIEW UL’s global compliance full service offer UL supports manufacturers, system integrators and operators of robotic systems with a variety of Advisory Training Testing/certification Gap analysis services to help ensure consistent compliance Advisory services related to Specific training regarding Testing and certification of Gap analysis from the International throughout the entire product life cycle. electrical and functional robotic functional safety functional safety, including Organization for Standardization safety during product requirements personnel qualification (ISO) to UL to facilitate market development Testing for specific robotic divers ifi c ation and access applications and their certifications (i.e., China, EU How can you benefit corresponding standards Machinery Directive, CE, etc.) Gain peace of mind for the entire value chain of robotic systems. Starting with the right choice of components, safe daily operations, Sourcing HazLoc EMC and wireless Cybersecurity effective market access and ‘cybersecurity by-design’ — UL is your partner of choice for UL Product IQ™ database Hazardous Locations EMC and wireless Cybersecurity advisory, robotic system compliance. to help source safety- (HazLoc) and Pressure testing to help ensure testing and assessment compliant, pre-certified Equipment Directive (PED) seamless communication solutions to help avoid components evaluations for safety security breaches compliance in explosive environments Relocation Remote services Risk assessment HMI For answers to your questions or to Factory relocation services Remote field evaluations Full-system risk assessment: Human-machine interface start a project today, contact us at through a global team of and testing engineered systems (HMI) safety services field experts compliance UL.com/contact-us OVERVIEW Overview of a typical robot certification process Click the fields to learn more Review Functional Risk of Fire, Electrical attestation Safety Evaluation Shock and Injury and certification Start up/ with respect to the Technical evaluation and decision › kick off › safety requirements for testing depending on industrial robots applicable standards Certification Final Concept verification and Documentation and project definition report for system design construction evaluation, and and confirmation certification › test plan development of the scope of Engineering review of certification › documentation, audit and Testing failure insertion testing Inspections Optional (Follow-Up) › preliminary investigation › Additional assessments EMC/wireless Cybersecurity Global robotics market overview › OVERVIEW Start up/kick off In the start-up phase, UL will help you understand the evaluation, testing and certification processes, as well as the applicable technical and regional requirements within your target markets. Based on the scope of the project, relevant standards applicable for the specific industry and the corresponding certification needs will be identified. Key deliverables Key benefits • Establish certification requirements needed for product • Early on determination of launch certification readiness as result • Identify the appropriate UL category as well as other global from the preliminary investigation certification requirements • Smooth project planning and • Determine scope of work required realization • Collaborate with UL’s engineering team, where appropriate, • Overview of project scope and e.g., to walk through the certification process and help costs determine the readiness to pursue certification • Avoid any delays during the • Handle project start-up formalities, e.g., draft a formal launch or commissioning of the quotation and address relevant service agreements robotic system OVERVIEW Ideally, UL experts are engaged as early as possible: during * While this is not a substitute for the product development and design cycle, even as early as the complete product evaluation and does not lead into the Preliminary investigation/ the design drawing or prototype phases. This allows a design certification mark immediately, it or preliminary investigation to the applicable construction will provide significant time and requirements to help you identify areas that may need cost savings later on. pre-certification review to be revised or reworked before the manufacturing (optional)* processes are established. Key deliverables • An engineering evaluation that includes a review of the documentation and several factors without testing, such as the ratings, protection methods and construction to the appropriate standard(s) • The development of the test program to determine the setup and sample requirements for the robot or robotic system that is submitted for certification • Review of the documentation and identification of what is needed to prepare reports for all applicable target market certifications • A final letter detailing the compliance/non-compliance findings and documentation requirements Key benefits • Help avoid rework and changes in the manufacturing process • Early identification of potential risks and effective management • Time and cost savings OVERVIEW Certification project definition and confirmation of the scope of certification Once the formal order has been received, UL initiates a project, which includes the verification of the applicable requirements and the customer preference for the delivery of the project. Additionally, a project number is generated, and the details of the scope of certification is agreed upon. The project will then be transferred to UL’s robotic engineering team to begin the next steps of the certification. The assigned UL engineer becomes the primary contact throughout the entire project. Key deliverables • Establish a project plan and delivery stages, e.g., discuss a modular approach • Determine a preferred project completion date • Define mutually agreed date to submit additional documentation: schematics, bill of material, samples, etc. Key benefits • One single point of contact throughout the entire project • Transparency on project milestones and completion date OVERVIEW Functional Safety Evaluation Did you know? July 21, 1984 accident in Michigan, USA, where the first human was killed by an industrial robot* The Functional Safety assessment will be carried out in accordance with applicable standards depending on the market and the type of robotic system, e.g., UL 1740, EN ISO 10218-1/ISO TS 15066 or UL 3100, ISO 13849, IEC 62061. UL experts can work with your teams to evaluate artifacts, conduct interviews, examine source codes and look at all the functional safety related processes. Key deliverables Key benefits • Concept evaluation • Help avoid rework and changes in your development process and initial gap analysis • Early identification of potential schedule risks and effective (letter report) project management • Preliminary functional • Time and cost savings safety report *Source: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robotik OVERVIEW Functional Safety Evaluation 2 Required documentation for evaluation phases Concept verification Engineering review of documentation, and system design audit and failure insertion testing • Concept/risk assessment, ISO 13849/IEC 62061: ISO 10218-1/ISO TS 15066, functional safety management • Functional safety management plan including tool qualification, in addition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Validating Safety in Human–Robot Collaboration: Standards and New Perspectives
    robotics Article Validating Safety in Human–Robot Collaboration: Standards and New Perspectives Marcello Valori 1,* , Adriano Scibilia 1, Irene Fassi 1 , José Saenz 2 , Roland Behrens 2, Sebastian Herbster 2, Catherine Bidard 3 , Eric Lucet 3 , Alice Magisson 4 , Leendert Schaake 5, Jule Bessler 5,6 , Gerdienke B. Prange-Lasonder 5,7 , Morten Kühnrich 8, Aske B. Lassen 8 and Kurt Nielsen 8 1 Institute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing, National Research Council of Italy, 20133 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (I.F.) 2 Fraunhofer IFF, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (S.H.) 3 Université Paris-Saclay, CEA List, F-91120 Palaiseau, France; [email protected] (C.B.); [email protected] (E.L.) 4 CEA, CEA Tech Grand Est, F-57075 Metz, France; [email protected] 5 Roessingh Research and Development, 7522 AH Enschede, The Netherlands; [email protected] (L.S.); [email protected] (J.B.); [email protected] (G.B.P.-L.) 6 Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands 7 Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands 8 Department of Robot Technology, Danish Technological Institute, 5230 Odense, Denmark; [email protected] (M.K.); [email protected] (A.B.L.); [email protected] (K.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-329-312-0837 Abstract: Human–robot collaboration is currently one of the frontiers of industrial robot implemen- Citation: Valori, M.; Scibilia, A.; tation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 – Values in Machine Age
    Univ. Prof. Dr. Sarah Spiekermann; “The Human Use of Machine Beings”, Chatper 3, Taylor and Francis, New York, 2015 Chapter 3 – Values in Machine Age Chapter 3 – Values in Machine Age ...............................................................................................1 An Introduction to Values........................................................................................................2 What is a value?...............................................................................................................................2 Intrinsic versus extrinsic values......................................................................................................3 Intrinsic Values in Philosophy and Psychology..............................................................................3 Nonmoral Values versus Moral Values...........................................................................................4 Values versus Virtues.......................................................................................................................4 Necessary Values for Human Growth.............................................................................................5 Ethical Knowledge in Machine Age................................................................................................7 What is Knowledge?......................................................................................................................7 Structuring ethical challenges in IT driven knowledge creation.....................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • CPS Platform Approach to Industrial Robots
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems PACIS 2015 Proceedings (PACIS) 2015 CPS Platform Approach to Industrial Robots: State of the Practice, Potentials, Future Research Directions Martin Mikusz University of Stuttgart, [email protected] Akos Csiszar University of Stuttgart, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2015 Recommended Citation Mikusz, Martin and Csiszar, Akos, "CPS Platform Approach to Industrial Robots: State of the Practice, Potentials, Future Research Directions" (2015). PACIS 2015 Proceedings. 176. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2015/176 This material is brought to you by the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) at AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). It has been accepted for inclusion in PACIS 2015 Proceedings by an authorized administrator of AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). For more information, please contact [email protected]. CPS PLATFORM APPROACH TO INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS: STATE OF THE PRACTICE, POTENTIALS, FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS Martin Mikusz, Graduate School of Excellence for advanced Manufacturing Engineering, GSaME, University of Stuttgart, Germany, [email protected] Akos Csiszar, Graduate School of Excellence for advanced Manufacturing Engineering, GSaME, University of Stuttgart, Germany, [email protected] Abstract Approaches, such as Cloud Robotics, Robot-as-a-Service, merged Internet of Things and robotics, and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) in production, show that the industrial robotics domain experiences a paradigm shift that increasingly links robots in real-life factories with virtual reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Speed and Separation Monitoring in Collaborative Robot Workcells
    Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 44 (2017) 144–155 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rcim Implementing speed and separation monitoring in collaborative robot workcells Jeremy A. Marvel n, Rick Norcross U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8230, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA article info abstract Article history: We provide an overview and guidance for the speed and separation monitoring methodology as pre- Received 4 March 2015 sented in the International Organization of Standardization's technical specification 15066 on colla- Received in revised form borative robot safety. Such functionality is provided by external, intelligent observer systems integrated 7 July 2016 into a robotic workcell. The SSM minimum protective distance function equation is discussed in detail, Accepted 1 August 2016 with consideration for the input values, implementation specifications, and performance expectations. We provide analytical analyses and test results of the current equation, discuss considerations for im- Keywords: plementing SSM in human-occupied environments, and provide directions for technological advance- Robot safety ments toward standardization. Speed and separation monitoring Published by Elsevier Ltd. 1. Introduction collaborative workspace, below which a safety-rated, controlled stop is issued. The fourth limits the momentum of a robot such Occupational health and safety organizations rely on national that contact with an operator will not result pain or injury. and international standards to provide guidance for maintaining This report focuses on the third collaborative scenario: “speed safe working environments. For robot workcells, these standards and separation monitoring” (SSM). From ISO/TS 15066, the mini- require the separation of man and machine by means of physical mum protective distance, S, at time t0 is barriers with safeguarded entryways.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO Update Supplement to Isofocus
    ISO Update Supplement to ISOfocus July 2021 International Standards in process ISO/CD Road vehicles — Environmental conditions and 16750-4 testing for electrical and electronic equipment An International Standard is the result of an agreement between — Part 4: Climatic loads the member bodies of ISO. A first important step towards an Interna- ISO/CD Road vehicles — Environmental conditions and tional Standard takes the form of a committee draft (CD) - this is cir- 16750-5 testing for electrical and electronic equipment culated for study within an ISO technical committee. When consensus — Part 5: Chemical loads has been reached within the technical committee, the document is TC 23 Tractors and machinery for agriculture sent to the Central Secretariat for processing as a draft International Standard (DIS). The DIS requires approval by at least 75 % of the and forestry member bodies casting a vote. A confirmation vote is subsequently ISO/CD 11471 Agricultural tractors and machinery — Cod- carried out on a final draft International Standard (FDIS), the approval ing of remote hydraulic power services and criteria remaining the same. controls ISO/CD Tractors and machinery for agriculture and 11783-7 forestry — Serial control and communications data network — Part 7: Implement messages application layer ISO/CD Agricultural machinery and tractors — Safety 18497-1 of partially automated, semi-autonomous and autonomous machinery — Part 1: Machine design principles and vocabulary CD registered TC 24 Particle characterization including sieving Period from 01 June to 01 July 2021 ISO/DTS 4807 Reference materials for particle size measure- ment - Specification of requirements These documents are currently under consideration in the technical committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Standards Analysis Ict Sector Luxembourg
    STANDARDS ANALYSIS ICT SECTOR LUXEMBOURG Version 8.0 · November 2017 · ISSN 2354-483X 2 WHITE PAPER · DIGITAL TRUST · Version 3.0 · October 2016 FOREWORD Technical standardization and standards play ILNAS carries out different legal missions in the an important role in the support of economy field of ICT. In addition, through the development. They can provide, for example, a "Luxembourg’s policy on ICT technical guide of the best practices for services and standardization 2015-2020", ILNAS product development, governance, quality and commissioned the Economic Interest Grouping assessment guarantee, safety, etc. Nowadays, “Agence pour la Normalisation et l’Économie de almost every professional sector relies on la Connaissance” (ANEC GIE) to strengthen standards to perform its daily activities and the national ICT sector involvement in provide services in an efficient manner. standardization work. Standards remain under a voluntary application scheme, but often they are a real added value ILNAS, with the support of ANEC GIE, has in order to comply with legislation. They can be launched several activities dedicated to considered as a source of benefits in each strengthen and develop the ICT-related sector of the economy, what is particularly true standardization landscape at the national level in the Information and Communication in terms of education and involvement of Technology (ICT) sector, which supports all the stakeholders, such as the creation of a other economic developments. University certificate Smart ICT for Business Innovation in collaboration with the University of The ICT sector has gained more and more Luxembourg. This first development was importance in the society as a whole in the last reinforced in May 2017 by the launch of a decades.
    [Show full text]
  • On Healthcare Robots
    ON HEALTHCARE ROBOTS Concepts, definitions, and considerations for healthcare robot governance Eduard Fosch-Villaronga & Hadassah Drukarch eLaw Center for Law and Digital Technologies Leiden University, The Netherlands Author details Dr. Eduard Fosch-Villaronga, Assistant Professor, eLaw Center for Law and Digital Technologies, Leiden University, the Netherlands, [email protected]. Hadassah Drukarch, Research Assistant, eLaw Center for Law and Digital Technologies, Leiden University, the Netherlands, [email protected]. May 2021 2 Disclaimer This report was funded by the LEaDing Fellows Marie Curie COFUND fellowship, a project that has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 707404. This report's contents are the authors' sole responsibility and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. The opinions expressed here are those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the authors' organizations. Contents of this publication may be quoted or reproduced, provided that the source of information is acknowledged. Acknowledgments This report was funded by the LEaDing Fellows Marie Curie COFUND fellowship, a project that has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 707404. The authors would like to thank Mrs. Aline-Priscilla Messi and Mrs. Rosalie ten Wolde for their help on the first draft of some parts of this report during their student assistantship as part of the Honors College Law at Leiden University during March-Aug 2020. The authors would also like to thank T.J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO 10218-1:2011 B8cbccb118cd/Iso-10218-1-2011
    INTERNATIONAL ISO STANDARD 10218-1 Second edition 2011-07-01 Robots and robotic devices — Safety requirements for industrial robots — Part 1: Robots Robots et dispositifs robotiques — Exigences de sécurité pour iTeh STlesA NrobotsDA industrielsRD P —R EVIEW Partie 1: Robots (st andards.iteh.ai) ISO 10218-1:2011 https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/514dc52b-e620-4f18-bbae- b8cbccb118cd/iso-10218-1-2011 Reference number ISO 10218-1:2011(E) © ISO 2011 ISO 10218-1:2011(E) iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW (standards.iteh.ai) ISO 10218-1:2011 https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/514dc52b-e620-4f18-bbae- b8cbccb118cd/iso-10218-1-2011 COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT © ISO 2011 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or ISO's member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright office Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20 Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11 Fax + 41 22 749 09 47 E-mail [email protected] Web www.iso.org Published in Switzerland ii © ISO 2011 – All rights reserved ISO 10218-1:2011(E) Contents Page Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................iv Introduction.........................................................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Safety System Design in Human-Robot Collaboration Implementation for a Demonstrator Case in Compliance with ISO/TS 15066
    DEGREE PROJECT IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2019 Safety system design in human-robot collaboration Implementation for a demonstrator case in compliance with ISO/TS 15066 CAROLIN SCHAFFERT KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT Safety system design in human-robot collaboration Implementation for a demonstrator case in compliance with ISO/TS 15066 Carolin Schaffert Master of Science Thesis TPRMM 2019 KTH Industrial Engineering and Management Production Engineering SE-100 44 Stockholm 1 Abstract A close collaboration between humans and robots is one approach to achieve flexible production flows and a high degree of automation at the same time. In human-robot collaboration, both entities work alongside each other in a fenceless, shared environment. These workstations combine human flexibility, tactile sense and intelligence with robotic speed, endurance, and accuracy. This leads to improved ergonomic working conditions for the operator, better quality and higher efficiency. However, the widespread adoption of human-robot collaboration is limited by the current safety legislation. Robots are powerful machines and without spatial separation to the operator the risks drastically increase. The technical specification ISO/TS 15066 serves as a guideline for collaborative operations and supplements the international standard ISO 10218 for industrial robots. Because ISO/TS 15066 represents the first draft for a coming standard, companies have to gain knowledge in applying ISO/TS 15066. Currently, the guideline prohibits a collision with the head in transient contact. In this thesis work, a safety system is designed which is in compliance with ISO/TS 15066 and where certified safety technologies are used.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide KINOVA® Gen3 Ultra Lightweight Robot
    User Guide KINOVA® Gen3 Ultra lightweight robot 5 | kinovarobotics.com Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Welcome.......................................................................................................................................................................6 Intended domains of application........................................................................................................................ 6 About this document...............................................................................................................................................6 Acronyms and abbreviations................................................................................................................................6 Warranty...................................................................................................................................................................... 9 EU Declaration of Incorporation..........................................................................................................................9 FCC Declaration of Comformity.......................................................................................................................... 11 Safety directives and warnings......................................................................................................................... 12 Disclaimer.................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CEN/WS COVR Safety in Close Human-Robot Interaction: Procedures For
    CEN WORKSHOP AGREEMENT Date: 2021 - 06 - 01 CWA XXXXX: 2021 Secretariat: UNI Safety in close human-robot interaction: procedures for validation tests ICS: CCMC will prepare and attach the official title page. CWA XXXX:2021 (E) Contents Page 1 European foreword ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 3 1 Scope .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 4 2 Normative references .......................................................................................................................... 5 5 3 Terms and definitions ......................................................................................................................... 6 6 4 Robot categories and general concepts of safety-related processes .................................. 8 7 4.1 Robot categorization ........................................................................................................................... 8 8 4.2 Robots under Machinery Directive ................................................................................................ 9 9 4.2.1 Industrial robots ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Robot Safety: Overview of Risk Assessment and Reduction
    botic Ro s & n A i u s t e o c m Chinniah, Adv Robot Autom 2016, 5:1 n a a Advances in Robotics t v i DOI: 10.4172/2168-9695.1000139 o d n A ISSN: 2168-9695 & Automation Short Communication Open Access Robot Safety: Overview of Risk Assessment and Reduction Chinniah Y* Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, University of Montreal, Canada Abstract Industrial robots are found increasingly in the workplace. They can cause severe and fatal injuries to workers during interventions such as maintenance, unjamming, adjustments and set-up. This paper summarises some of the causes of accidents linked to robots. It presents risk assessment as described in international standards as a method to make workplaces involving robots safe. The operating modes in terms of safety aspects and strategies around collaborative robots are also presented. A case study involving safety of an industrial robot used as auxiliary equipment to a horizontal injection molding machine is described. Risk analysis and risk reduction measures for the case study are then summarised. Keywords: Collaborative robots; Risk reduction; Risk assessment allowed access to hazards). In 5 cases there was guard rail or emergency stop. Problems with safeguards included: bypassing, unsuited to the Introduction situation, improper usage, not installed, temporarily disabled and in In this paper, for simplicity, the term robot is used to for a degraded mode. industrial robot system (i.e., industrial robot, end-effectors and any Risk Assessment machinery equipment, devices, external auxiliary axes or sensors supporting the robot performing its tasks) as well as for collaborative Risk linked to machinery is defined in ISO 12100 [5] Safety of robots.
    [Show full text]