DOCSLIB.ORG

CEN/WS COVR Safety in Close Human-Robot Interaction: Procedures For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CEN/WS COVR Safety in Close Human-Robot Interaction: Procedures For CEN WORKSHOP AGREEMENT Date: 2021 - 06 - 01 CWA XXXXX: 2021 Secretariat: UNI Safety in close human-robot interaction: procedures for validation tests ICS: CCMC will prepare and attach the official title page. CWA XXXX:2021 (E) Contents Page 1 European foreword ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 3 1 Scope .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 4 2 Normative references .......................................................................................................................... 5 5 3 Terms and definitions ......................................................................................................................... 6 6 4 Robot categories and general concepts of safety-related processes .................................. 8 7 4.1 Robot categorization ........................................................................................................................... 8 8 4.2 Robots under Machinery Directive ................................................................................................ 9 9 4.2.1 Industrial robots ................................................................................................................................... 9 10 4.2.2 Service robots ....................................................................................................................................... 10 11 4.2.3 Personal care robots .......................................................................................................................... 10 12 4.3 Medical robots ..................................................................................................................................... 11 13 4.4 Transversal “System-level” safety validation ........................................................................... 12 14 5 Cross-category safety skills ............................................................................................................. 14 15 5.1 An example: Limit Range of Movement....................................................................................... 14 16 5.2 Safety skills for CHRI .......................................................................................................................... 16 17 5.2.1 Limit Physical Interaction Energy ................................................................................................ 16 18 5.2.2 Maintain Safe Distance ...................................................................................................................... 16 19 5.2.3 Dynamic Stability ................................................................................................................................ 16 20 5.2.4 Limit Range of Movement ................................................................................................................ 17 21 5.2.5 Maintain Proper Alignment ............................................................................................................ 17 22 5.2.6 Limit Restraining Energy ................................................................................................................. 17 23 6 System-Level Validation Protocols ............................................................................................... 17 24 6.1 SLVP identification ............................................................................................................................. 18 25 6.2 Contents of a SLVP .............................................................................................................................. 19 26 6.3 SLVP examples ..................................................................................................................................... 20 27 Annex A (informative)- Safety perspectives in modern robotics .................................................... 21 28 Annex B (informative) - List of test methods provided by standards ........................................... 23 29 Annex C - System-level validation protocol template .......................................................................... 24 30 Annex D - SLVP example: Test mobile platform to maintain a separation distance ................. 27 31 Annex E - SLVP example: Test manipulator in shared human-robot control to prevent spatial 32 overreaching for the subject ........................................................................................................... 41 33 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................................................... 53 2 CWA XXXX:2021 (E) 34 European foreword 35 This CEN Workshop Agreement has been developed in accordance with the CEN-CENELEC Guide 29 36 “CEN/CENELEC Workshop Agreements – A rapid prototyping to standardization” and with the relevant 37 provisions of CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations - Part 2. It was approved by a Workshop of 38 representatives of interested parties on YYYY-MM-DD, the constitution of which was supported by CEN 39 following the public call for participation made on YYYY-MM-DD. However, this Workshop 40 Agreement does not necessarily include all relevant stakeholders. 41 The final text of this CEN Workshop Agreement was provided to CEN for publication on YYYY-MM-DD. 42 Results incorporated in this CWA received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 43 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 779966. 44 45 The following organizations and individuals developed and approved this CEN Workshop 46 Agreement: 47 48 name organization/individual 49 50 name organization/individual 51 52 …. 53 54 55 Although the Workshop parties have made every effort to ensure the reliability and accuracy of technical 56 and non- technical descriptions, the Workshop is not able to guarantee, explicitly or implicitly, the 57 correctness of this document. Anyone who applies this CEN Workshop Agreement shall be aware that 58 neither the Workshop, nor CEN, can be held liable for damages or losses of any kind whatsoever. The 59 use of this CEN Workshop Agreement does not relieve users of their responsibility for their own 60 actions, and they apply this document at their own risk. The CEN Workshop Agreement should not be 61 construed as legal advice authoritatively endorsed by CEN/CENELEC. 62 3 CWA XXXX:2021 (E) 63 Introduction 64 The traditional concept of industrial robots refers to bulky machines, where robot workspace is 65 physically separated from the utilizer work environment. The concept of collaborative applications 66 reached the industrial domain and was elevated to one of the key-enabling technologies of the Industry 67 4.0 paradigm. Similar approaches can be nowadays applied to a wide variety of other machines, designed 68 to work closely with humans. 69 At the same time, we are witnessing increasing implementation of service robots in several domains, such 70 as rehabilitation, personal care, agriculture and logistics. Medical equipment and systems based on 71 robotic technologies are more and more implemented in current medical practice and rehabilitation and 72 assistance robots in particular have become relevant, as aging populations are increasingly affected by 73 chronic disabilities. 74 As consequences, human-robot interaction is becoming closer in industrial practice and, on the other 75 hand, the unstructured - and often close - human-robot interaction characterizing service robots is 76 becoming increasingly relevant as these machines spread in the different application fields. 77 In general, robot systems and applications characterized by close human-robot interaction (such as 78 collaborative applications in industrial robotics or rehabilitation robots in medical applications) are 79 accompanied by new challenges from the safety perspective (i.e. the potential - or intended - contact 80 between human and robot introduces a higher exposure to mechanical hazards). In such cases, the 81 assessment of safety can be highly complex and variable, depending on the specific implementation 82 scenario and the safety-related measures implemented. The new safety-related challenges need to be 83 properly addressed and validated. 84 According to robot categorization, standards provide different means to deal with safety assessment in 85 human-robot interaction, and several test methods are being recommended in the last few years, 86 characterized by different levels of detail and belonging to different robot categories. Considering the 87 common challenges characterizing close human-robot interaction for various domains, the objective of 88 this CWA is to provide a framework for compiling testing procedures for the validation of the residual 89 risks related to the mechanical hazards arising in close human-robot interaction, by using a transversal 90 approach based on standard and well-established best practices. The following stakeholders can benefit 91 from this CWA: 92 - for industrial robots: integrators or users when defining the specific application to implement a 93 robot or a robotic device; 94 - for the medical robotics field: manufacturers, for the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Standards Analysis Ict Sector Luxembourg
    Version 6.0 – June 2016 ISSN 2354-483X STANDARDS ANALYSIS ICT SECTOR LUXEMBOURG · V5.0/09.2015 LUXEMBOURG LUXEMBOURG ICT SECTOR ICT CONTACT : ILNAS & ANEC STANDARDS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS STANDARDS Southlane Tower I · 1, avenue du Swing · L-4367 Belvaux Tel. : (+352) 24 77 43 -70 · Fax : (+352) 24 79 43 -70 E-mail : anec@ilnas.etat.lu ANS/AN03 www.portail-qualite.lu 2015 · © ILNAS/ANEC September Executive summary In 2012 the “Institut Luxembourgeois de la Normalisation, de l’Accréditation, de la Sécurité et qualité des produits et services” (ILNAS) initiated an analysis of European and international standards in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector. The aim of this analysis is to develop an information and exchange network for ICT standardization knowledge in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Since 2013, this analysis has been carried out in the frame of the implementation of the “Luxembourg’s policy on ICT technical standardization” (which was last updated in 2015)1. The ICT sector is already an active sector at the national standardization level with 65 national delegates currently registered by ILNAS2. These delegates are involved in standardization technical committees to participate actively and follow closely the work performed at international level and have the task of ensuring that the views and positions of Luxembourg are understood and known by the technical committees. ILNAS is convinced that this sector could be even more active, especially since some ICT subsectors do not yet benefit from a sufficient representation of national delegates (e.g.: Internet of Things, Cloud Computing, Big Data, Smart Cities). Thus, the purposes of this analysis are firstly, to provide useful information to national stakeholders regarding standardization activities in the field of ICT and secondly, to involve them into an integrated and innovative approach of standardization.
    [Show full text]
  • Standards Analysis Ict Sector Luxembourg
    Version 5.0 – September 2015 ISSN 2354-483X STANDARDS ANALYSIS ICT SECTOR LUXEMBOURG · V5.0/09.2015 LUXEMBOURG LUXEMBOURG ICT SECTOR ICT CONTACT : ILNAS & ANEC STANDARDS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS STANDARDS Southlane Tower I · 1, avenue du Swing · L-4367 Belvaux Tel. : (+352) 24 77 43 -70 · Fax : (+352) 24 79 43 -70 E-mail : anec@ilnas.etat.lu ANS/AN03 www.portail-qualite.lu 2015 · © ILNAS/ANEC September Executive summary The “Institut Luxembourgeois de la Normalisation, de l’Accréditation, de la Sécurité et qualité des produits et services” (ILNAS) has inititated in 2012 an analysis of European and international standards in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector. This analysis intends to develop an information and exchange network for ICT standardization knowledge in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Since 2013, this analysis has been carried out in the frame of the implementation of the “Luxembourg’s policy on ICT technical standardization” (which was last updated in 2015)1. The ICT sector is already an active sector at the national standardization level with 53 national delegates currently registered by ILNAS. These delegates are involved in standardization technical committees to participate actively and follow closely the work performed at international level and have the task of ensuring that the views and positions of the country are understood and known by the technical committees. ILNAS is convinced that this sector could be even more active, especially since some ICT subsectors do not yet have national delegates (e.g.: Sensor Networks, Internet of Things). Thus, the purposes of this analysis are firstly, to provide useful information to national stakeholders regarding standardization activities in the field of ICT and secondly, to involve them into an integrated and innovative approach of standardization.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Automation
    ISO Focus The Magazine of the International Organization for Standardization Volume 4, No. 12, December 2007, ISSN 1729-8709 Industrial automation • Volvo’s use of ISO standards • A new generation of watches Contents 1 Comment Alain Digeon, Chair of ISO/TC 184, Industrial automation systems and integration, starting January 2008 2 World Scene Highlights of events from around the world 3 ISO Scene Highlights of news and developments from ISO members 4 Guest View ISO Focus is published 11 times Katarina Lindström, Senior Vice-President, a year (single issue : July-August). It is available in English. Head of Manufacturing in Volvo Powertrain and Chairman of the Manufacturing, Key Technology Committee Annual subscription 158 Swiss Francs Individual copies 16 Swiss Francs 8 Main Focus Publisher • Product data – ISO Central Secretariat Managing (International Organization for information through Standardization) the lifecycle 1, ch. de la Voie-Creuse CH-1211 Genève 20 • Practical business Switzerland solutions for ontology Telephone + 41 22 749 01 11 data exchange Fax + 41 22 733 34 30 • Modelling the E-mail gasiorowski@iso.org manufacturing enterprise Web www.iso.org • Improving productivity Manager : Roger Frost with interoperability Editor : Elizabeth Gasiorowski-Denis • Towards integrated Assistant Editor : Maria Lazarte manufacturing solutions Artwork : Pascal Krieger and • A new model for machine data transfer Pierre Granier • The revolution in engineering drawings – Product definition ISO Update : Dominique Chevaux data sets Subscription enquiries : Sonia Rosas Friot • A new era for cutting tools ISO Central Secretariat • Robots – In industry and beyond Telephone + 41 22 749 03 36 Fax + 41 22 749 09 47 37 Developments and Initiatives E-mail sales@iso.org • A new generation of watches to meet consumer expectations © ISO, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Validating Safety in Human–Robot Collaboration: Standards and New Perspectives
    robotics Article Validating Safety in Human–Robot Collaboration: Standards and New Perspectives Marcello Valori 1,* , Adriano Scibilia 1, Irene Fassi 1 , José Saenz 2 , Roland Behrens 2, Sebastian Herbster 2, Catherine Bidard 3 , Eric Lucet 3 , Alice Magisson 4 , Leendert Schaake 5, Jule Bessler 5,6 , Gerdienke B. Prange-Lasonder 5,7 , Morten Kühnrich 8, Aske B. Lassen 8 and Kurt Nielsen 8 1 Institute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing, National Research Council of Italy, 20133 Milan, Italy; adriano.scibilia@stiima.cnr.it (A.S.); irene.fassi@stiima.cnr.it (I.F.) 2 Fraunhofer IFF, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany; jose.saenz@iff.fraunhofer.de (J.S.); roland.behrens@iff.fraunhofer.de (R.B.); sebastian.herbster@iff.fraunhofer.de (S.H.) 3 Université Paris-Saclay, CEA List, F-91120 Palaiseau, France; catherine.bidard@cea.fr (C.B.); eric.lucet@cea.fr (E.L.) 4 CEA, CEA Tech Grand Est, F-57075 Metz, France; alice.magisson@cea.fr 5 Roessingh Research and Development, 7522 AH Enschede, The Netherlands; l.schaake@rrd.nl (L.S.); j.bessler@rrd.nl (J.B.); g.prange@rrd.nl (G.B.P.-L.) 6 Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands 7 Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands 8 Department of Robot Technology, Danish Technological Institute, 5230 Odense, Denmark; mkun@teknologisk.dk (M.K.); aala@teknologisk.dk (A.B.L.); kuni@teknologisk.dk (K.N.) * Correspondence: marcello.valori@stiima.cnr.it; Tel.: +39-329-312-0837 Abstract: Human–robot collaboration is currently one of the frontiers of industrial robot implemen- Citation: Valori, M.; Scibilia, A.; tation.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephan Goericke Editor the Future of Software Quality Assurance the Future of Software Quality Assurance Stephan Goericke Editor
    Stephan Goericke Editor The Future of Software Quality Assurance The Future of Software Quality Assurance Stephan Goericke Editor The Future of Software Quality Assurance Editor Stephan Goericke iSQI GmbH Potsdam Germany Translated from the Dutch Original book: ‘AGILE’, © 2018, Rini van Solingen & Manage- ment Impact – translation by tolingo GmbH, © 2019, Rini van Solingen ISBN 978-3-030-29508-0 ISBN 978-3-030-29509-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29509-7 This book is an open access publication. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2020 Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Inter- national License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence Standardization White Paper (2018 Edition) 2018
    Translation The following government-issued white paper describes China's approach to standards-setting for artificial intelligence. Appendices list all of China's current (as of January 2018) and planned AI standardization protocols, and provide examples of applications of AI by China's leading tech companies. Title Artificial Intelligence Standardization White Paper (2018 Edition) 2018 Author China Electronics Standardization Institute (CESI; ; ) is the "compiling unit" () for this white paper. The 2nd Industrial Department () of the Standardization Administration of China (SAC; ) is the "guidance unit" () for this white paper. Source CESI website, January 24, 2018. CESI is a think tank subordinate to the PRC Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT; ); CESI is also known as the 4th Electronics Research Institute (; ) of MIIT. SAC is a component of the PRC State Administration for Market Regulation (), a ministry-level agency under China's cabinet, the State Council. The Chinese source text is available online at: http://www.cesi.cn/images/editor/20180124/20180124135528742.pdf Translation Date Translator Editor May 12, 2020 Etcetera Language Group, Inc. Ben Murphy, CSET Translation Lead Contributing institutions (in no particular order) China Electronics Standardization Institute Shanghai Development Center of Computer (CESI) Software Technology Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy Shanghai Xiao-i Robot Technology Co., Ltd. of Sciences Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing iQIYI Technology Co., Ltd. Tsinghua University Beijing Yousheng Zhiguang Technology Co., Ltd. (mavsyin) Peking University Extreme Element (Beijing) Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Renmin University of China Beijing ByteDance Technology Co., Ltd. Beihang University Beijing Sensetime Technology Development Co., Ltd. iFLYTEK Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Ant Small and Micro Financial Services Group Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 – Values in Machine Age
    Univ. Prof. Dr. Sarah Spiekermann; “The Human Use of Machine Beings”, Chatper 3, Taylor and Francis, New York, 2015 Chapter 3 – Values in Machine Age Chapter 3 – Values in Machine Age ...............................................................................................1 An Introduction to Values........................................................................................................2 What is a value?...............................................................................................................................2 Intrinsic versus extrinsic values......................................................................................................3 Intrinsic Values in Philosophy and Psychology..............................................................................3 Nonmoral Values versus Moral Values...........................................................................................4 Values versus Virtues.......................................................................................................................4 Necessary Values for Human Growth.............................................................................................5 Ethical Knowledge in Machine Age................................................................................................7 What is Knowledge?......................................................................................................................7 Structuring ethical challenges in IT driven knowledge creation.....................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • CPS Platform Approach to Industrial Robots
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems PACIS 2015 Proceedings (PACIS) 2015 CPS Platform Approach to Industrial Robots: State of the Practice, Potentials, Future Research Directions Martin Mikusz University of Stuttgart, martin.mikusz@gsame.uni-stuttgart.de Akos Csiszar University of Stuttgart, akos.csiszar@gsame.uni-stuttgart.de Follow this and additional works at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2015 Recommended Citation Mikusz, Martin and Csiszar, Akos, "CPS Platform Approach to Industrial Robots: State of the Practice, Potentials, Future Research Directions" (2015). PACIS 2015 Proceedings. 176. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2015/176 This material is brought to you by the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) at AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). It has been accepted for inclusion in PACIS 2015 Proceedings by an authorized administrator of AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). For more information, please contact elibrary@aisnet.org. CPS PLATFORM APPROACH TO INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS: STATE OF THE PRACTICE, POTENTIALS, FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS Martin Mikusz, Graduate School of Excellence for advanced Manufacturing Engineering, GSaME, University of Stuttgart, Germany, martin.mikusz@gsame.uni-stuttgart.de Akos Csiszar, Graduate School of Excellence for advanced Manufacturing Engineering, GSaME, University of Stuttgart, Germany, akos.csiszar@gsame.uni-stuttgart.de Abstract Approaches, such as Cloud Robotics, Robot-as-a-Service, merged Internet of Things and robotics, and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) in production, show that the industrial robotics domain experiences a paradigm shift that increasingly links robots in real-life factories with virtual reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Speed and Separation Monitoring in Collaborative Robot Workcells
    Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 44 (2017) 144–155 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rcim Implementing speed and separation monitoring in collaborative robot workcells Jeremy A. Marvel n, Rick Norcross U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8230, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA article info abstract Article history: We provide an overview and guidance for the speed and separation monitoring methodology as pre- Received 4 March 2015 sented in the International Organization of Standardization's technical specification 15066 on colla- Received in revised form borative robot safety. Such functionality is provided by external, intelligent observer systems integrated 7 July 2016 into a robotic workcell. The SSM minimum protective distance function equation is discussed in detail, Accepted 1 August 2016 with consideration for the input values, implementation specifications, and performance expectations. We provide analytical analyses and test results of the current equation, discuss considerations for im- Keywords: plementing SSM in human-occupied environments, and provide directions for technological advance- Robot safety ments toward standardization. Speed and separation monitoring Published by Elsevier Ltd. 1. Introduction collaborative workspace, below which a safety-rated, controlled stop is issued. The fourth limits the momentum of a robot such Occupational health and safety organizations rely on national that contact with an operator will not result pain or injury. and international standards to provide guidance for maintaining This report focuses on the third collaborative scenario: “speed safe working environments. For robot workcells, these standards and separation monitoring” (SSM). From ISO/TS 15066, the mini- require the separation of man and machine by means of physical mum protective distance, S, at time t0 is barriers with safeguarded entryways.
    [Show full text]
  • An Engineer's Guide to Industrial Robot Designs
    e-book An Engineer’s Guide to Industrial Robot Designs A compendium of technical documentation on robotic system designs ti.com/robotics Q2 | 2020 Table of Contents/Overview 1. Introduction 3. Robot arm and driving system (manipulator) 1.1 An introduction to an industrial robot system. 3 3.1.1 How to protect battery power management systems from thermal damage. 45 2. Robot system controller 3.1.2 Protecting your battery isn’t as hard as 2.1 Control panel you think.....................................46 2.1.1 Using Sitara™ processors for Industry 3.1.3 Position feedback-related reference designs 4.0 servo drives.......................9 for robotic systems............................47 2.2 Servo drives for robotic systems 4. Sensing and vision technologies 2.2.1 The impact of an isolated gate driver. 13 4.1 TI mmWave radar sensors in robotics 2.2.2 Understanding peak source and applications..................................48 sink current parameters . 17 4.2 Intelligence at the edge powers autonomous 2.2.3 Low-side gate drivers with UVLO versus factories .....................................53 BJT totem poles ......................19 4.3 Use ultrasonic sensing for graceful robots. 55 2.2.4 An external gate-resistor design guide for 4.4 How sensor data is powering AI in robotics. 57 gate drivers.......................... 20 4.5 Bringing machine learning to embedded 2.2.5 High-side motor current monitoring for systems .....................................61 overcurrent protection. 22 4.6 Robots get wheels to address new 2.2.6 Five benefits of enhanced PWM rejection for challenges and functions. 65 in-line motor control. 24 4.7 Vision and sensing-technology reference 2.2.7 How to protect control systems from thermal designs for robotic systems.
    [Show full text]
  • MAPPING the DEVELOPMENT of AUTONOMY in WEAPON SYSTEMS Vincent Boulanin and Maaike Verbruggen
    MAPPING THE DEVELOPMENT OF AUTONOMY IN WEAPON SYSTEMS vincent boulanin and maaike verbruggen MAPPING THE DEVELOPMENT OF AUTONOMY IN WEAPON SYSTEMS vincent boulanin and maaike verbruggen November 2017 STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE SIPRI is an independent international institute dedicated to research into conflict, armaments, arms control and disarmament. Established in 1966, SIPRI provides data, analysis and recommendations, based on open sources, to policymakers, researchers, media and the interested public. The Governing Board is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. GOVERNING BOARD Ambassador Jan Eliasson, Chair (Sweden) Dr Dewi Fortuna Anwar (Indonesia) Dr Vladimir Baranovsky (Russia) Ambassador Lakhdar Brahimi (Algeria) Espen Barth Eide (Norway) Ambassador Wolfgang Ischinger (Germany) Dr Radha Kumar (India) The Director DIRECTOR Dan Smith (United Kingdom) Signalistgatan 9 SE-169 72 Solna, Sweden Telephone: +46 8 655 97 00 Email: sipri@sipri.org Internet: www.sipri.org © SIPRI 2017 Contents Acknowledgements v About the authors v Executive summary vii Abbreviations x 1. Introduction 1 I. Background and objective 1 II. Approach and methodology 1 III. Outline 2 Figure 1.1. A comprehensive approach to mapping the development of autonomy 2 in weapon systems 2. What are the technological foundations of autonomy? 5 I. Introduction 5 II. Searching for a definition: what is autonomy? 5 III. Unravelling the machinery 7 IV. Creating autonomy 12 V. Conclusions 18 Box 2.1. Existing definitions of autonomous weapon systems 8 Box 2.2. Machine-learning methods 16 Box 2.3. Deep learning 17 Figure 2.1. Anatomy of autonomy: reactive and deliberative systems 10 Figure 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Iso/Iec Tr 24028:2020(E)
    W E a- I 18 V a3 0 E 2 02 R ) 23 2 i t/ 8- P .a is 2 h /s 0 D e s 24 R t rd - .i : a tr A s d d c- D rd ar an ie N a d st o- n / is A d ta og / T n s l 1 S a ll ta 4a st u a 0 h ( F /c fd e ai 6 T h. 0 i e 7a TECHNICAL .it 9 s -1 rd 3 REPORT a b7 nd -9 ta 2 /s 2a :/ -4 ps b tt e h 44 ISO/IEC TR Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Overview of trustworthiness in artificial intelligence 24028 Technologies de l'information — Intelligence artificielle — Examen d'ensemble de la fiabilité en matière d'intelligence artificielle First edition PROOF/ÉPREUVE ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020(E) Reference number © ISO/IEC 2020 ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020(E) W E a- I 18 V a3 0 E 2 02 R ) 23 2 i t/ 8- P .a is 2 h /s 0 D e s 24 R t rd - .i : a tr A s d d c- D rd ar an ie N a d st o- n / is A d ta og / T n s l 1 S a ll ta 4a st u a 0 h ( F /c fd e ai 6 T h. 0 i e 7a .it 9 s -1 rd 3 a b7 nd -9 ta 2 /s 2a :/ -4 ps b tt e h 44 © ISO/IEC 2020 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]