DOCSLIB.ORG

Shropshire Fungus Group Newsletter 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shropshire Fungus Group Newsletter 2017 Shropshire Fungus Group Newsletter 2017 Grifola frondosa – photo by Philip Leather Contents 1. A question for you – Jo Weightman 2. The Old Man of the Woods – Ted Blackwell 3. A new member writes... – Martin Scott 4. Foray at home! – Les Hughes 5. Bury Ditches foray – Jo Weightman 6. Pre-historic tinder fungi – Ted Blackwell 7. Foray at the Hurst – Rob Rowe 8. Another new member writes – Concepta Cassar 9. BMS Study week 2016 – Ray James 10. Foray at the Bog – Jo Weightman 11. Earthstars at Lydbury North – Rob Rowe 12. Foray at Oswestry Racecourse – Susan Leather 13. Some pictures from 2016 14. A foreign fungus – Les Hughes 15. The answer to the question A question for you from Jo Weightman What do these four have in common? Buglossoporus quercinus Laetiporus sulphureus Polyporus squamosus Polyporus umbellatus All photos copyright Jo Weightman Answer at the end! Who first called it “Old Man of the Woods”? The toadstool Strobilomyces strobilaceus is obviously one of the Boletus Tribe but differs in several ways. Apart from its striking appearance, the spore print is violaceus-to-black, and although not poisonous it is not considered worth eating. It doesn’t usually decay readily and mummified specimens can sometimes be found still standing in the woods tinged with green algae and encroaching mosses long after the fruiting season. The late Dr Derek Reid of Kew Mycology considered the Severn Valley to be its UK headquarters and although there are approaching 50 Shropshire records on the national database (FRDBI), however it was not recorded in the county between 2008 and 2016. The scientific name is from Classical Greek and translates as “fircone fungus” by which it is often referred to in popular reference books, but as if honouring a long-established tradition, ‘Old Man of the Woods’ has been adopted as the official Recommended English Name. The name presumably arising from its lingering woodland presence and shaggy 2 unkempt appearance. It’s a name to evoke hoary images of gnarled and crooked hulks of ancient trees and scenes of sylvan rustic folk-lore lost in the mists of time. But earlier UK fungus reference books don’t mention that name and as far as the UK is concerned there doesn’t appear to be anyhint of historic folk-lore. The name seems to make its first entry into UK literature about the 1970s. Where did it come from, what was its origin? Perhaps an American import that caught-on with UK authors? A new member writes... The Calvatia Gigantea (Giant Puffball) is alive and well, and living in Shropshire. The Shropshire Fungus Group has recorded a healthy history of the fungus in the county, from William Phillips Hamilton’s record of a foray in Minsterley in 1897 through to a Church Stretton cemetery sighting in 2007. But since 2007, for the vicecounty of Salop, there have been no further records for C. Gigantea added to the Fungal Records Database of Britain & Ireland. Giant Puffballs have always excited, and until 2016 also eluded, me, so maybe the same is true of the wider Shropshire community… or maybe they’re just so magical and unreal that we marvel at them, and then, like an imagined glimpse of another world, we forget precisely what we saw as soon as it leaves our line of sight – as if it couldn’t have existed in the first place. “It looks like a discarded ice cream tub. Or maybe it’s a big milk carton that someone’s thrown out?” I puzzled to my partner, C, as we abled over a Telfordian field, and gazed at a white blob in the distance. We have a game, C and I, we call it ‘Is It A Mushroom, Or Is It Rubbish?’ More often than not the exciting bright yellow-orange thing in a tree is a Sainsbury’s carrier bag, rather than a giant Laetiporus Sulphureus, the suspected Amanita Muscaria turns out to be a chewn-up ball, and the interesting pale fungi turns out to be a less-than-interesting present left by a passing canine. “Well if you think it’s something, you might as well go and look – I’m not going to bother,” said C, puppy to hand. And I’m glad that I did. As the distant blob resolved I started to wonder if I’d come across a human skull. Surely not? But then, I have heard say that dog walkers are often the discoverers of unfortunate events from the night (or month) before. “Oh wow! C! C! You’ve got to come and look!” Nestled amongst a strimmed-back bed of nettles on the border between grazing land and hard woodland, a perfect giant puffball, about the size of a small football, shone in the evening sunlight. A twist and a pull and it was up, and I was doing my best Hamlet: “Alas, poor Yorick; I knew him well.” I was too excited to worry about how hackneyed it was to jump straight into the famous lines. Eating foraged fungi is not always a wise pursuit. But, fortunately, the keen amateur mycologist knows that there are not many things one could confuse with a foot-wide bone- 3 white puffball. Clyde M. Christensen, in his 1943 book ‘Common Edible Mushrooms’, includes all puffballs in his ‘Foolproof Four’. Descriptions in the book are troublingly scant about the variability of puffballs, and I’m sure that a first-timer might mistakenly gather a large number of earthballs in excitement and delight, only to take them home, halve them, and get an unpleasant surprise, so one would be unlikely to find such a ‘gung-ho’ publication today. However, the giant puffball is a nice easy one, and I felt no guilt plucking the specimen as it sat surrounded by those that had come before it. 1.2 kilograms of (a single) puffball takes a while to consume, but we managed it – griddled like a steak, in pancakes with sage for breakfast, added to a stew – it kept us going for days. The next time we made it out on an amble, 70 miles east of the previous find, but at almost exactly the same latitude, we stumbled across another smaller specimen – we’d gone from three decades never seeing a giant puffball to finding two in almost as many days. C and I are excited to join the Shropshire Fungus Group this coming year, and to discover all of the wonderful Salopian fungi that we didn’t really get many of, over in Leicestershire, our previous home – for example, it seems we can barely move for Sarcoscypha coccinea or Auricularia auricula-judae around the Ironbridge Gorge. Foray at home! Are you fed up of tramping through woods and sifting through piles of litter to find your fungi? Well stop right now and adopt a new approach. Foraying at home can produce impressive results, and allow you to find rare and unusual fungi without stirring more than a few yards from your door. Of course it is a little more time consuming. My interest in mycology only stretches back a decade or so, but already I’ve got more than twenty species on my home foray list. My early interest was edible fungus, and after my first foray, having been told that Honey Fungus is edible (and it was a good year for Honey Fungus), I brought home a huge collection and cooked a good bit of it up. I’m not sure now if displaying it on the garden table was a good idea, because I think it has got its own back, spread its spores around the garden, and is currently besieging my Victoria Plum tree, with an enormous ring of fruit bodies all around. Last year it killed a winter-flowering Viburnum, and this year my pet Alder, raised from a seedling rescued from the wall of a canal dock in South Wales in 1983, failed to put out even a single leaf. That might be bad news for another of my fungal finds. I share my plum crop with a brown rot, only last year identified as Monilinia fruticola, so if my plum tree dies so does the Monilinia (although it still lives in my other plum tree at the back). That tree regularly plays host to a tidy little collection of Glistening Inkcaps, which appear at its base, but the tree still thrives. Nearby is the remains of an apple tree, which we had to sacrifice to allow more light into the vegetable garden. That played host first to Chondrostereum purpureum, and only last year to Bjerkandra adusta. 4 The first time I saw Tubaria furfuracea, a genus I hadn’t even heard of at that time, was when I found it growing at the bottom of a log pile, waiting to be burnt. And some old decking, now removed, played host for a while to Hypholoma fasiculare. A log I was given as a present, intended to produce a fine crop of Shitake mushrooms, managed a single fruit body, before turning over control to Stereum hirsutum. In addition to playing host to Honey Fungus my lawn also produces an occasional Marasmius oreades, but not in a ring, and not with any regularity. More frequently it offers a home to Panaeolini foensecii, one of the first fungi I identified using a microscope, by seeing the ornamentation on the spores under oil. Adjacent to the lawn is a gravel path. I think it is an original path from when the house was built in the 1840s. I moved in in 1987, and in 2010 up popped a single Morel, Morchella vulgaris.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tinder Fungus, the Ice Man, and Amadou by Matt Bowser
    Refuge Notebook • Vol. 18, No. 9 • February 26, 2016 The tinder fungus, the Ice Man, and amadou by Matt Bowser Amadou cap given to me by Dominique Collet. Conchs of tinder fungus (Fomes fomentarius) on a birch log near Nordic Lake, Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, A couple of years ago I was given a remarkable, 17.Feb.2016 (http://bit.ly/1OsJXAa). beautiful hat by my friend Dominique Collet. This cap is made of a soft, brown material with decora- tive, stamped trim of the same. Light and velvety, it is reminiscent of wool felt but finer and smoother. Do- minique had traveled through Eastern Europe specifi- cally to learn how these amadou caps were made from a kind of tree-killing fungus. Known by several names including hoof fungus, tinder fungus, and the “true” tinder fungus, Fomes fomentarius grows on hardwoods, especially birch, around the world in northern latitudes. It is quite com- mon here on the Kenai and anywhere else in Alaska where birch trees grow. Ecologically, tinder fungus acts both as a pathogen, causing wood rot and contributing to the demise of living trees, and as a decomposer, continuing to break down dead wood in snags and logs. The fungus enters the tree through damaged bark or broken branches, then ramifies through wood and bark. Woody, durable conchs of the tinder fungus appear on the outside of the tree or log and grow larger each year as new layers An amadou patch for drying flies (image from http: are added to the underside of the conchs. //www.orvis.com/).
    [Show full text]
  • A Translation of the Linnaean Dissertation the Invisible World
    BJHS 49(3): 353–382, September 2016. © British Society for the History of Science 2016 doi:10.1017/S0007087416000637 A translation of the Linnaean dissertation The Invisible World JANIS ANTONOVICS* AND JACOBUS KRITZINGER** Abstract. This study presents the first translation from Latin to English of the Linnaean disser- tation Mundus invisibilis or The Invisible World, submitted by Johannes Roos in 1769. The dissertation highlights Linnaeus’s conviction that infectious diseases could be transmitted by living organisms, too small to be seen. Biographies of Linnaeus often fail to mention that Linnaeus was correct in ascribing the cause of diseases such as measles, smallpox and syphilis to living organisms. The dissertation itself reviews the work of many microscopists, especially on zoophytes and insects, marvelling at the many unexpected discoveries. It then discusses and quotes at length the observations of Münchhausen suggesting that spores from fungi causing plant diseases germinate to produce animalcules, an observation that Linnaeus claimed to have confirmed. The dissertation then draws parallels between these findings and the conta- giousness of many human diseases, and urges further studies of this ‘invisible world’ since, as Roos avers, microscopic organisms may cause more destruction than occurs in all wars. Introduction Here we present the first translation from Latin to English of the Linnaean dissertation published in 1767 by Johannes Roos (1745–1828) entitled Dissertatio academica mundum invisibilem, breviter delineatura and republished by Carl Linnaeus (1707– 1778) several years later in the Amoenitates academicae under the title Mundus invisibi- lis or The Invisible World.1 Roos was a student of Linnaeus, and the dissertation is important in highlighting Linnaeus’s conviction that infectious diseases could be trans- mitted by living organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 84.-A Target-Shaped Nectria Canker on a Sugar Maple Stem
    Figure 84.-A target-shaped Nectria canker on a sugar Figure 85.-Numerous pink-orange young fruNng bodies of maple stem. the coral spot fungus developing on dead bark of Norway maple. Coral spot canker. Coral spot canker (Nectria cinnabarina) is common on sugar maple and other hardwood trees. It usu- fruiting bodies also appear among the black forms produced ally attacks only dead Wigs and branches but also can kill earlier. The red structures are the sexual stage of the branches and stems of young trees weakened by freezing. fungus. Both Sages often are found on the same twig. drought, or mechanical injury. It is common and highly Spores of both can infect fresh wounds. visible. Coral spot canker is considered an "annual" dii.The The fungus infects dead buds and small branch wounds host tree usually regains enough vigor during the growing caused by hail, frost, or insect feeding. It is especially impor- season to block the later invasion of new tissue. Maintaining tant on trees stressed by drought or other environmental fac- gwd stand vigor should suffice as an effective control in tors. The degree of stress to the host determines how rapidly forest stands. the fungus develops. It kills the young bark, which soon darkens and produces a flattened or depressed canker on Steganosponurn ovafum is another common fungus of dying the branch around the infection. The fungus develops mostly and dead maple branches (Fig. 86). It produces black hriing when the tree is dormant and produces its distinctive fruiting structures on branches of trees stressed previously, bodies in late spring or early summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Variability of Fomes Fomentarius Basidiomata Based on Literature Data
    Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Naturae, 1: 42–51, 2016, ISSN 2543-8832 Svetlana Gáperová1*, Ján Gáper2,3, Terézia Gašparcová1, Kateřina Náplavová3,5, Peter Pristaš4 1 Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, Tajovského 40, 974 01 Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic, *[email protected] 2 Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 24, 960 63 Zvolen, Slovak Republic 3 Faculty of Sciences, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho 10, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic 4 Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Pavol Josef Šafárik University, Moyzesova 11, 040 01 Košice, Slovak Republic 5 CEB-Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, Portugal Morphological variability of Fomes fomentarius basidiomata based on literature data Introduction e genus Fomes is a taxon accepted in the Polyporaceae family of Polyporales order in class Agaricomycetes, subphylum Agaricomycotina and phylum Basidiomycota. Fomes fomentarius is the type species of the genus (Donk, 1960). ere are two mor- phological species in the genus Fomes recognized at present: F. fomentarius (L.) Fr. and F. fasciatus (Sw.) Cooke (Ryvarden, 1991). Although only mean basidiospore size is a helpful morphological characteristic in identication of the respective species, ITS and rpb2 sequence data and optimum temperature for hyphal growth in vitro, support separation of these two distinct species (McCormick et al., 2013a; Gáper et al., 2016). F. fomentarius is an ecologically and economically important polypore wood decay macrofungus with major roles not only in nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems as decomposer of dead wood and plant litter, but also as a source of medicinal and nutra- ceutical products (Tello et al., 2005; Collado et al., 2007; Neifar et al., 2013; Dresch et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Troop Operating Budget
    Sample Troop Budget Actual Budget No. of No. of Annual Cost Scouts/ Total Unit Troop Operating Budget Annual Cost Scouts/ Total Unit Per Scout/Unit Adults Cost Per Person Adults Cost PROGRAM EXPENSES: Registration and insurance Total youth + adults @ $24 ea. $ 24.00 35 $ 840.00 fees $ 24.00 $ - $ 12.00 25 $ 300.00 Boys' Life Total subscriptions @ $12 ea. $ 12.00 $ - $ 40.00 1 $ 40.00 Unit charter fee Yearly flat fee @ $40 $ 40.00 $ 9.00 25 $ 225.00 Advancement Ideally, 100% of youth included in badges $ 9.00 $ - and ranks (example @ $9 ea.) Camping trips Location $ 15.00 25 $ 375.00 (1) Camping trip $ - $ 15.00 25 $ 375.00 (2) Camping trip $ - $ 15.00 25 $ 375.00 (3) Camping trip $ - $ 15.00 25 $ 375.00 (4) Camping trip $ - $ 15.00 25 $ 375.00 (5) Camping trip $ - $ 15.00 25 $ 375.00 (6) Camping trip $ - $ 20.00 25 $ 500.00 District events Camporees (2) $ - $ 15.00 25 $ 375.00 Other (1) $ - $ 15.00 25 $ 375.00 Special activities Merit badge day, first aid rally, etc. $ - $ 10.00 10 $ 100.00 Field trips Location $ - $ 180.00 1 $ 180.00 Handbooks One for each new youth @ $10 ea. $ 10.00 $ - $ 25.00 5 $ 125.00 Adult leader training Outdoor Skills $ - $ 20.00 2 $ 40.00 Unit equipment purchases Tents, cook stoves, etc. $ - $ 50.00 2 $ 100.00 Leader camp fees $ - $ 50.00 1 $ 50.00 Leader recognition Thank yous, veterans awards, etc. $ - $ 5,500.00 TOTAL UNIT BUDGETED PROGRAM EXPENSES: $ 40.00 INCOME: $ 40.00 25 $ 1,000.00 Annual dues (monthly amount x 10 or 12 months) $ - $ 500.00 1 $ 500.00 Surplus from prior year (beginning fund balance) $ - $ - Other income source $ - $ 1,500.00 INCOME SUBTOTAL: $ - $ 4,000.00 TOTAL FUNDRAISING NEED: $ - $ 12,857.00 x 25% = $ 3,214.25 POPCORN SALE TROOP GOAL: / $ - ___% includes qualifying for all bonus dollars Need Commission Unit goal $ 12,857.00 / 25 = $ 514.28 POPCORN SALES GOAL PER MEMBER: / $ - Unit Goal No.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    Available Online at http://www.recentscientific.com International Journal of CODEN: IJRSFP (USA) Recent Scientific International Journal of Recent Scientific Research Research Vol. 10, Issue, 06(A), pp. 32722-32725, Jun, 2019 ISSN: 0976-3031 DOI: 10.24327/IJRSR Research Article SPECIES COMPOSITION AND ROTTEN DISEASES OF TREE SPECIES IN SUBTROPICAL FORESTS OF AZERBAIJAN Gungor М.S., Abasova Т.S., Aliyeva B. N., Alibeyli N.S and Мuradov P.Z Institute of Microbiology of the NAS of Azerbaijan, Baku DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24327/ijrsr.2019.1006.3531 ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: Objectives Annotation. From the carried out of research in the subtropical forests of Azerbaijan Received 6th March, 2019 were found 60 species of xylotrophic basidiomycetes, among which about 20 species cause rotten Received in revised form 15th diseases in living trees. 75% of diseases were found in the trunks, and 25% in the roots of tree April, 2019 species. However, the prevalence rate of these types of diseases is characterized by different Accepted 12th May, 2019 quantities. So, the rotting diseases caused by the mushrooms Fomes fomentarius, Ganoderma Published online 28th Jun, 2019 applanatum and Fomitopsis pinicola are the most dangerous according to the degree of spread quantitative indicators of which are 5-7%. The degree of rotten diseases caused by other fungi constitute less than 1%, even some are characterized by single finds. Key Words: subtropical forests, tree species, basidiomycetes, pathologies, stem and root rotting, the degree of prevalence. Copyright © Gungor М.S et al, 2019, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Tree Decays
    Evolving Urban Landscapes: Trees, Bees and IPM Strategies, City of Seattle 2018 IPM Seminars Common Tree Decays presented by, Bess Bronstein Horticultural Consultant & ISA Certified Arborist [email protected] Photo: Jay W. Pscheidt, 2018 Plant Pathogenic Fungi Symptoms Susan K. Hagle, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org • cankers • galls • leaf spots • leaf blotches • root rots • stem rots • wilts • deformity Signs • mycelia • spores • fruiting bodies Robert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org Fruiting Bodies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycoperdon_perlatum puffballs Laura Sims, 2012, PNW Disease Handbook mushrooms conks Magickcanoe.com Fungi Characteristics hypha (pl., hyphae) mycelium (pl., mycelia) • made up of hyphae, which form mycelia • cell wall is mostly chitin, sometimes has cellulose • reproduce by spores (sexual/asexual), budding (asexual), and fragmentation (asexual) Fungi Characteristics http://biology-pictures.blogspot.com Plant Pathogenic Fungi How do they survive? • survival spores • mycelial pieces • fruiting bodies (mushrooms, brackets, conks) • saprophytes in plant debris How do they spread? • infected plant debris • infested seeds • spore dispersal in air • splashing water • tools • insects https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armillaria_mellea Basidiomycete Life Cycle http://www.cals.ncsu.edu Basidiospores Image courtesy of Dr C. Jeffree Wood Decay Fungi white rot: fungus decays cellulose and lignin (decayed wood appears bleached and is often spongy or stringy) brown rot: fungus decays cellulose, but leaves lignin
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Forest Age and Composition on Coleoptera Associated with Fungal Fruiting Bodies in Southwest Ohio
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2020 Effects of Forest Age and Composition on Coleoptera Associated with Fungal Fruiting Bodies in Southwest Ohio Jeffrey M. Brown Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Biology Commons Repository Citation Brown, Jeffrey M., "Effects of Forest Age and Composition on Coleoptera Associated with Fungal Fruiting Bodies in Southwest Ohio" (2020). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 2349. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/2349 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EFFECTS OF FOREST AGE AND COMPOSITION ON COLEOPTERA ASSOCIATED WITH FUNGAL FRUITING BODIES IN SOUTHWEST OHIO A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science by JEFFREY M. BROWN B.S.B., Wright State University, 2009 A.S., Sinclair Community College, 2003 2020 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL 24 July 2020 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Jeffrey M. Brown ENTITLED Effects of Forest Age and Composition on Coleoptera Associated with Fungal Fruiting Bodies in Southwest Ohio BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science. _____________________________ John O. Stireman, III, Ph.D. Thesis Director _____________________________ Scott E. Baird, Ph.D. Chair, Biological Sciences Committee on Final Examination: ________________________________ John O.
    [Show full text]
  • Root Rots, Butt Rots & Stem Decays of Alaskan Trees
    Root Rots, Butt Rots & Stem Decays of Alaskan Trees DAMAGE AGENTS PAGE Root & Butt Rots (Unknown) 1 Armillaria species / Armillaria Root Rot 3 Heterobasidion occidentale / Heterobasidion Root Rot 5 Onnia tomentosa / Tomentosus Root Rot 7 Phaeolus schweinitzii / Velvet Top 9 Pholiota species / Yellow Cap Fungus 11 Stem Decays (Unknown) 13 Echinodontium tinctorium / Paint Fungus 15 Fomes fomentarius / Tinder Conk 17 Fomitopsis officinalis / Quinine Conk 19 Fomitopsis pinicola / Red Belt Conk 21 Ganoderma applanatum / Artist’s Conk 23 Ganoderma tsugae / Varnish Conk 25 Inonotus obliquus / Cinder Conk 27 Laetiporus sulphureus / Chicken of the woods 29 Phellinus hartigii / Hartigs Conk 31 Phellinus igniarius and P. tremulae/ False Tinder Conk 33 Piptoporus betulinus / Birch Conk 35 Porodaedalea pini / Red Ring Rot 37 0 Root and Butt Rots 1 Root and Butt Rots Hosts: All tree species in Alaska. ID: Decayed roots and butts. Mushrooms, conks, or other fungal structures on the root collar or roots (nonpathogenic mushrooms and conks can also be found near tree bases). Uprooted trees have few remaining roots (root ball, root wad). The direction of tree fall may be inconsistent rather than with the direction of prevailing wind. Remarks: The known root and butt diseases in Alaska are caused by internal wood decay (rot) fungi that may overlap with stem decay fungi. Butt rot fungi decay the heartwood at the base of the stem. Trees can live with butt rot for years or decades. Tree mortality usually occurs due to uprooting or snapping associated with the loss of structural integrity. 2 Armillaria species Armillaria Root Rot mycelial fans 3 rhizomorphs Hosts: All tree species in Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Species Living on Dead Wood – Lessons for Dead Wood Management
    Silva Fennica 39(2) review articles Ecology of Species Living on Dead Wood – Lessons for Dead Wood Management Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Nicholas Kruys and Thomas Ranius Jonsson, B.G., Kruys, N. & Ranius, T. 2005. Ecology of species living on dead wood – Lessons for dead wood management. Silva Fennica 39(2): 289–309. Dead wood has been identified as a crucial component for forest biodiversity. Recent research has improved our understanding of habitat relations for many species associated with dead wood. However, the consequences for forest management are yet to be explored. In this review we build upon the growing volume of studies on dead wood dependent species, the dynamics of dead wood and ecological theory in order to identify the chal- lenges for forest management at the landscape level. The review has a Fennoscandian focus, but the problems and challenges are similar in many forest ecosystems. We argue that it is necessary to 1) counteract the current shortage in availability of dead wood, 2) concentrate planning at the landscape level in order to minimize isolation and reduce edge effects, 3) create a variety of dead wood types, and 4) utilise available quantita- tive analytical tools. This calls for new approaches to management that to a large extent includes available knowledge, and to find platforms for planning forested landscapes with diverse holdings. Keywords landscape planning, Fennoscandian forests, woodland key habitats, saproxylic species, epixylic species, forest management, coarse woody debris Authors´ addresses Jonsson: Mid Sweden University, Dept of Natural Sciences, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, Sweden; Kruys: SLU, Dept of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden; Ranius: SLU, Dept of Entomology, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden E-mail [email protected] Received 1 March 2004 Revised 14 January 2005 Accepted 4 March 2005 1 Introduction concerning the availability of dead wood and specific species’ demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Polypore–Beetle Associations in Finland
    Ann. Zool. Fennici 48: 319–348 ISSN 0003-455X (print), ISSN 1797-2450 (online) Helsinki 30 December 2011 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2011 Polypore–beetle associations in Finland Dmitry S. Schigel Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland (e-mail: [email protected]) Received 21 Jan. 2011, revised version received 4 May 2011, accepted 10 Aug. 2011 Schigel, D. S. 2011: Polypore–beetle associations in Finland. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 48: 319–348. Seven old-growth, mostly spruce- and pine-dominated, protected forests rich in dead wood were inventoried for polypores and polypore-associated beetles in Finland in 2001–2007. A total of 198 polypore species (86% of the Finnish species list) were examined for associated Coleoptera. Of these, 116 species (59% of the studied species, or 50% of the Finnish polypore mycota) were found to host adults and/or larvae of 176 beetle species. Fifty-six polypore species were utilized by larvae of 21 beetle spe- cies. Many new fungus–beetle associations were discovered among 544 species pairs, including 421 polypore fruit body–adult Coleoptera species co-occurrences, and 123 fruit body–larva associations. Eighty-two species of fungi (41% of the studied species, or 36% of the Finnish polypores) were neither visited nor colonized by Coleoptera. Introduction Nikitsky (1993) reported the host fungi of Myc- etophagidae of Russia and adjacent countries, During recent decades polypores have become and Krasutskiy (2005) reported 208 fungicolous one of the taxonomically best-studied groups beetles and 89 species of their host fungi in of forest organisms in Finland (Niemelä 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • The Star Carr Fungi Harry K
    CHAPTER 31 The Star Carr Fungi Harry K. Robson Introduction ‘Quantities of a large bracket fungus identified by Mr E. J. H. Corner of the Botany School, Cambridge University, were found. A few specimens adhered to birch stems, but most are presumed to have been gathered. In some examples the flesh has been stripped off, possibly for use, as Mr Corner suggests, as tinder (amadou).’ (Clark 1954, 18) Although Clark (1954) referenced the original report by Corner (1950), which was based on the fungi recov- ered from the 1950 excavation campaign, he does not provide any further information on the assemblage. Consequently there is no way of knowing whether any further specimens were recovered during the 1949 and 1951 excavation campaigns. Moreover, neither Corner (1950) nor Clark (1954) stated how many specimens were found or provided any quantification for the number of specimens that were burnt or modified. From the archive mapping undertaken by Milner et al. (2013a), at least 11 specimens are known to exist. A total of nine specimens were recorded in the collections at the Rotunda Museum in Scarborough. In addition, one is presently on display at the Whitby Museum (Milner et al. 2013b), and another one is on display at the British Museum. Corner’s report (1950) states that the large bracket fungus was identified based on the microscopic structure and comparison with recently collected specimens. According to Corner (1950), the absence of spores was attributable to their germination in water or to their decay. However, it was also noted that spores have not been recorded on living specimens, except during the spring, and so it is possible that those from Star Carr may have been collected during the summer or autumn months ‘when it is usual for “foresters” to fell trees or to collect bark (in preference to spring when the sap is rising and makes the wood wet and the implement clog)’ (Corner 1950, 124).
    [Show full text]