Ii ABSTRACT Vaccine Hesitancy Is As Old As the Vaccine Itself, Yet This

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ii ABSTRACT Vaccine Hesitancy Is As Old As the Vaccine Itself, Yet This ABSTRACT Vaccine hesitancy is as old as the vaccine itself, yet this issue has been historically difficult for public health measures to effectively address, particularly after the advent of Web 2.0. The most recent wave of vaccine hesitancy comes from a purported link between the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and autism, and has led to the release of a documentary-style film entitled Vaxxed: from Cover-Up to Catastrophe in 2016. To better understand vaccine rhetoric and its implications for informing future interventions, this project uses a novel analytic framework that identifies key narratives of vaccine hesitancy and traces the ways that they are subsequently disrupted or bolstered in vaccine conversations. Specifically, the narratives of conspiracy, injustice, victimization, and enlightenment that are presented in Vaxxed are followed as they are rebutted in mainstream newspaper articles, and then further evoked or contested in the comment sections that follow. Ultimately, this project suggests that public health, physician, and layperson efforts that take into account the sophistication of vaccine skeptic epistemologies and knowledge are better able to disrupt the central narrative of enlightenment to reduce the spread of vaccine hesitancy. Furthermore, increased autistic representation on platforms that engage with the vaccine conversation could undermine victimization narratives and ensure pro-vaccine discourse that respects people with autism. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my thesis advisor Prof. Jordynn Jack of the Department of English and Comparative Literature at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Prof. Jack was endlessly patient with the bumbling beginnings of this project, as well as all of the muddled middle parts, and I am incredibly grateful for her guidance throughout this process. I would also like to thank the members of my committee, Prof. Jane Thrailkill and Dr. Melissa Geil of the Department of English and Comparative Literature at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, for their valuable comments on this thesis. Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to my family, friends, and fellow members of the HHIVE Lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for their kindness and support throughout this process. Without all of you, this thesis never would have come to be. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................1 The History...........................................................................................................................1 The Problem......................................................................................................................... 3 The Potential Solution.......................................................................................................... 7 The Project........................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1: THE VAXXED NARRATIVE................................................................................. 13 A Claim of Conspiracy...................................................................................................... 15 An Indictment of Injustice................................................................................................. 19 The Charges and the Evidence..............................................................................19 The Direct Examination........................................................................................ 20 The Mistrial...........................................................................................................23 The Closing Statement.......................................................................................... 24 A Verdict of Victimization................................................................................................ 25 Autistic Children................................................................................................... 25 Autism Families.................................................................................................... 27 Society at Large.................................................................................................... 29 Conclusion......................................................................................................................... 30 CHAPTER TWO: THE PRESS RESPONSE................................................................................. 34 The Question of Credentials: Reframing Allegations of Injustice..................................... 38 The Series of Scandals: Burying the Conspiracy Narrative............................................... 39 The Quiet Claims: A Motion to Dismiss........................................................................... 41 The Advocate for Alternatives: Complicating the Forces of Victimization...................... 42 Conclusion......................................................................................................................... 44 iv CHAPTER THREE: THE PUBLIC EXCHANGE........................................................................ 48 A Question of Epistemology.............................................................................................. 50 Science (as a Segue to Skepticism).......................................................................52 Skepticism (as a Segue to Science).......................................................................53 Testimonies of Terror........................................................................................... 56 Saviors or Charlatans?..........................................................................................58 “Anti-Vax Trolls” vs. “Pro-Vax Shills”............................................................................. 60 Is Autism the Real Victimizer?.......................................................................................... 61 Conclusion......................................................................................................................... 64 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................... 68 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................79 v INTRODUCTION Vaccine hesitancy, or an intentional delay or refusal of vaccination despite readily available access, is not a new phenomenon; in fact, it technically predates vaccination itself (Dubé et al., “Vaccine Hesitancy, Vaccine Refusal…” 100). Concerns about vaccines trace their roots to the late nineteenth century practice of variolation, or the intentional inoculation of healthy individuals with smallpox cultures from ill patients to produce a controlled infection that confers later immunity (Wolfe and Sharp 430). During that age of rampant quackery, the practice was met with skepticism, particularly due to the dangers associated the intentional smallpox infection. The History In 1796, British physician Edward Jenner developed the first true vaccine, which instead used cultures from the far less dangerous cowpox to confer immunity for smallpox (Stern and Markel 612). This finding resulted in mandated vaccinations to control smallpox transmission in both the United Kingdom and later, the United States. In turn, during the following decades, various AV organizations were formed in both nations by those who questioned the safety and efficacy of vaccination or resented the government oversight. After extensive lobbying, the United Kingdom relaxed policies that criminalized parents who refused to vaccinate their children. In the United States, however, the landmark Jacobson v. Massachusetts ruling in 1905 following the 1901 smallpox epidemic set a new precedent allowing for government intervention in private matters in the interest of maintaining public health (Albert et al. 375; Stern and Markel 617). 1 This ruling, however, would not prove to be the end of vaccine skepticism. Despite a period of relative vaccine confidence during the mid-twentieth century, by the 1970s, the diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus vaccine (DPT) was called into question. A 1974 London report described 56 children who developed neurological complications after receiving pertussis vaccine. This report led to the 1982 WRC-TV broadcast of the film DPT: Vaccine Roulette, thereby spreading anti-DPT sentiments to the United States. Such sentiments were further exacerbated by a American Academy of Neurology meeting presentation in the same year suggesting that DPT vaccine causes sudden infant death syndrome (Fenichel 193). Although both associations were later disproven, lawsuits by concerned parents against pharmaceutical companies reduced their willingness to manufacture vaccines, driving up prices. Consequently, the United States Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) in 1986, allowing parents to obtain compensation for vaccine-induced injuries while protecting vaccine manufacturers from litigation and establishing the Vaccine Adverse Event Report System, through which providers could officially record suspected injuries reported by parents (Dubé et al., “Vaccine Hesitancy, Vaccine Refusal…” 104, Smith 267). Unfortunately, the compensation mechanism created by NCVIA,
Recommended publications
  • Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality
    REPORT BRIEF AUGUST 2011 .For more information visit www.iom.edu/vaccineadverseeffects Adverse Effects of Vaccines Evidence and Causality Immunizations are a cornerstone of the nation’s efforts to protect people from a host of infectious diseases. As required by the Food and Drug Admin- istration, vaccines are tested for safety before they enter the market, and their performance is continually evaluated to identify any risks that might appear over time. Vaccines are not free from side effects, or “adverse effects,” but most are very rare or very mild. Importantly, some adverse health problems following a vaccine may be due to coincidence and are not caused by the vaccine. As part of the evaluation of vaccines over time, researchers assess evidence to deter- As part of the evaluation of mine if adverse events following vaccination are causally linked to a specific vaccines over time, researchers vaccine, and if so, they are referred to as adverse effects. Under the National assess evidence to determine if Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Congress established the National Vac- adverse events following cine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) to provide compensation to peo- vaccination are causally linked to ple injured by vaccines. Anyone who thinks they or a family member—often a a specific vaccine, and if so, they are referred to as adverse effects. child—has been injured can file a claim. The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the agency within the Department of Health and Human Services that administers VICP, can use evidence that demonstrates a causal link between an adverse event and a vaccine to streamline the claim process.
    [Show full text]
  • Feb 2020 February Is Cabin Fever Month
    Like Share Tweet Share this Page: Anthroposophic Medicine for Whole Person Healing & Wellness February, 2020 February is cabin fever month where winter has a strong hold. In Sacramento, it’s spring-like. We will be closed Friday, February 14. Smile, and generously use loving words, and maybe fewer hugs this germy Valentine’s! (See #3 under Coronavirus and watch 'sanitation.') Remember to have your ANNUAL check-in! Stay established with RMT so we are up- to-date if you need help in the time ahead. Our doctor-patient relationship with you is the foundation of your medical exemption – gaps in contact over a year make it look like we do not have an active doctor-patient relationship. Get in front of the calendar and get it done! Combine that with a needed sports physical or vaccine consult to plan the schedule for the safest vaccination possible. Read below about: CORONALikeVIRUS, Share Tweet Share this Page: What to do if you receive a letter from the DEPARTMENT OF INVESTIGATION , Updates on positive movement in LEGISLATION, and REACTIONS TO CALM POWDER. Also, a great free FERMENTATION SUMMIT is underway now-- join! ❤ A Voice for Choice LiveAware Expo is this month!❤ Check out the speakers, including Elana Freeland, author of Under an Ionized Sky: from chemtrails to space fence lockdown. Peaceful days MKS for all of us CORONAVIRUS 1. Prevention: Vit C, Vit A (Carlson cod liver oil), Zinc, Astragalus (if you have autoimmune disease) or Elderberry (for those without autoimmune disease); glycyrrhiza (licorice) helps treat symptoms. (We have high quality versions of these immune strengthening products for you to purchase.) Watch more on this HERE.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrimination and Harassment
    Dear Member of the Legislature - My name is April Groom and I am in District 54. I am a mom of a child with multiple food allergies and sensitivities and I’m concerned that if this bill passes, it will be extremely hard to get a medical exemption. I’m also concerned because my son is on an IEP. Per the law of his IEP, I believe this would be discrimination and harassment. Please oppose HB 3063. Pease read the attached letter from my 9-year-old, from District 54, who's goal it is in school this year to Be a Better writer! He has an IEP. This letter was a 2-day labor of love. We are concerned he would Be denied a puBlic education if this Bill passes and per his IEP, we feel he would Be discriminated against. His letter is attached in this email and it is also copied here fully (he got tired of writing and shortened it), included in my first point of concern, Below titled: Civil Rights/Discrimination. HB 3063 is an infringement on our right to bodily autonomy and informed consent. The US Supreme Court has ruled vaccines as 'unavoidably unsafe' and where there is risk, there must Be choice. Each and every vaccine insert for each and every vaccine lists "Death" as a possible outcome. See my 8 points of concern, listed numerically, with supporting factors, below: As a mom and a citizen of the state of Oregon, and we as parents, I am concerned aBout the following 8 points, regarding HB3063: 1).Civil Rights/ Discrimination 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:21-Cv-00756 ECF No. 1, Pageid.1 Filed 08/27/21 Page 1 of 49
    Case 1:21-cv-00756 ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Filed 08/27/21 Page 1 of 49 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN JEANNA NORRIS, on behalf of herself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT SAMUEL L. STANLEY, JR. ) FOR DECLARATORY AND in his official capacity as President of ) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Michigan State University; DIANNE ) BYRUM, in her official capacity as Chair ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED of the Board of Trustees, DAN KELLY, ) in his official capacity as Vice Chair ) of the Board of Trustees; and RENEE ) JEFFERSON, PAT O’KEEFE, ) BRIANNA T. SCOTT, KELLY TEBAY, ) and REMA VASSAR, in their official ) capacities as Members of the Board of ) Trustees of Michigan State University, ) and JOHN and JANE DOES 1-10, ) ) Defendants. ) Plaintiff and those similarly situated, by and through their attorneys at the New Civil Liberties Alliance (“NCLA”), hereby complains and alleges the following: INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT a. By the spring of 2020, the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which can cause the disease COVID-19, had spread across the globe. Since then, and because of the federal government’s “Operation Warp Speed,” three separate coronavirus vaccines have been developed and approved more swiftly than any other vaccines in our nation’s history. The Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”) for the Pfizer- 1 Case 1:21-cv-00756 ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 08/27/21 Page 2 of 49 BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (“BioNTech Vaccine”) on December 11, 2020.1 Just one week later, FDA issued a second EUA for the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine (“Moderna Vaccine”).2 FDA issued its most recent EUA for the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 Vaccine (“Janssen Vaccine”) on February 27, 2021 (the only EUA for a single-shot vaccine).3 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Pausing Encounters with Autism and Its Unruly Representation: an Inquiry Into Method, Culture and Academia in the Making of Disability and Difference in Canada
    Pausing Encounters with Autism and Its Unruly Representation: An inquiry into method, culture and academia in the making of disability and difference in Canada A dissertation submitted to the Committee of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Science. TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada Copyright by John Edward Marris 2013 Canadian Studies Ph.D. Graduate Program January 2014 ABSTRACT Pausing Encounters with Autism and Its Unruly Representation: An inquiry into method, culture and academia in the making of disability and difference in Canada John Edward Marris This dissertation seeks to explore and understand how autism, asperger and the autistic spectrum is represented in Canadian culture. Acknowledging the role of films, television, literature and print media in the construction of autism in the consciousness of the Canadian public, this project seeks to critique representations of autism on the grounds that these representations have an ethical responsibility to autistic individuals and those who share their lives. This project raises questions about how autism is constructed in formal and popular texts; explores retrospective diagnosis and labelling in biography and fiction; questions the use of autism and Asperger’s as metaphor for contemporary technology culture; examines autistic characterization in fiction; and argues that representations of autism need to be hospitable to autistic culture and difference. In carrying out this critique this project proposes and enacts a new interdisciplinary methodology for academic disability study that brings the academic researcher in contact with the perspectives of non-academic audiences working in the same subject area, and practices this approach through an unconventional focus group collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Before the Committee on Government Reform
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 466 915 EC 309 063 TITLE Autism: Present Challenges, Future Needs--Why the Increased Rates? Hearing before the Committee on Government Reform. House of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Second Session (April 6,2000). INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Government Reform. REPORT NO House-Hrg-106-180 PUB DATE 2001-00-00 NOTE 483p. AVAILABLE FROM Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402-9328. Tel: 202-512-1800. For full text: http://www.house.gov/reform. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF02/PC20 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Autism; *Child Health; Children; *Disease Control; *Etiology; Family Problems; Hearings; *Immunization Programs; Incidence; Influences; Parent Attitudes; *Preventive Medicine; Research Needs; Symptoms (Individual Disorders) IDENTIFIERS Congress 106th; Vaccination ABSTRACT This document contains the proceedings of a hearing on April 6, 2000, before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform. The hearing addressed the increasing rate of children diagnosed with autism, possible links between autism and childhood vaccinations, and future needs of these children. After opening statements by congressmen on the Committee, the statements and testimony of Kenneth Curtis, James Smythe, Shelley Reynolds, Jeana Smith, Scott Bono, and Dr. Wayne M. Danker, all parents of children with autism, are included. Their statements discuss symptoms of autism, vaccination concerns, family problems, financial concerns, and how parents can be helped. The statements and testimony of the second panel are then provided, including that of Andrew Wakefield, John O'Leary, Vijendra K. Singh, Coleen A. Boyle, Ben Schwartz, Paul A.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing the Justifications for Vaccine Denial and Applying The
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Honors Program Theses Honors Program 2016 A healthy herd: addressing the justifications for accinev denial and applying the health belief model to the current anti- vaccination movement Sarah L. McHugh University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2016 Sarah L. McHugh Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt Part of the Infectious Disease Commons, and the Preventive Medicine Commons Recommended Citation McHugh, Sarah L., "A healthy herd: addressing the justifications for accinev denial and applying the health belief model to the current anti-vaccination movement" (2016). Honors Program Theses. 225. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt/225 This Open Access Honors Program Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A HEALTHY HERD: ADDRESSING THE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR VACCINE DENIAL AND APPLYING THE HEALTH BELIEF MODEL TO THE CURRENT ANTI- VACCINATION MOVEMENT A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Designation University Honors with Distinction Sarah L. McHugh University of Northern Iowa May 2016 This Study by: Sarah L. McHugh Entitled: A Healthy Herd: Addressing the Justifications for Vaccine Denial and Applying the Health Belief Model to the Current Anti-vaccination Movement has been approved as meeting the thesis or project requirement for the Designation University Honors with Distinction __________ ______________________________________________________ Date Dr. Thomas Davis, Honors Thesis Advisor, Division of Health Promotion and Education, School of Health, Physical Education and Leisure Services __________ ______________________________________________________ Date Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENCE and HEALTH MISINFORMATION in the DIGITAL AGE: How Does It Spread? Who Is Vulnerable? How Do We Fight It?
    SCIENCE AND HEALTH MISINFORMATION IN THE DIGITAL AGE: How does it spread? Who is vulnerable? How do we fight it? ERIC MERKLEY & PETER LOEWEN J U LY, 2021 ABOUT PPF Good Policy. Better Canada. The Public Policy Forum builds bridges among diverse participants in the policy-making process and gives them a platform to examine issues, offer new perspectives and feed fresh ideas into critical policy discussions. We believe good policy is critical to making a better Canada—a country that’s cohesive, prosperous and secure. We contribute by: . Conducting research on critical issues . Convening candid dialogues on research subjects . Recognizing exceptional leaders Our approach—called Inclusion to Conclusion—brings emerging and established voices to policy conversations, which informs conclusions that identify obstacles to success and pathways forward. PPF is an independent, non-partisan charity whose members are a diverse group of private, public and non-profit organizations. ppforum.ca @ppforumca © 2021, Public Policy Forum 1400 - 130 Albert Street Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1P 5G4 613.238.7858 ISBN: 978-1-77452-085-7 WITH THANKS TO OUR PARTNERS ABOUT THE AUTHORS ERIC MERKLEY Eric Merkley (PhD, UBC) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Toronto. He was the lead survey analyst of the Media Ecosystem Observatory, which studied the Canadian information ecosystem and public opinion during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Digital Democracy Project, which studied misinformation and public attitudes during the 2019 Canadian federal election. His research focuses on the link between political elite behaviour, the news media, and public opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • MCBH 20191105 Submittedmat
    From: John Robinson To: Christopher Weisgram Subject: Fw: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Marathon County Board Meeting 10/1/19 - Public Comment; Kayla Gorman Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 9:16:09 AM Attachments: PIC Immunocompromised Children.pdf PIC Waning Immunity & Measles.pdf PIC Measles Info.pdf From: kkHAL <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 12:11 PM Subject: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Marathon County Board Meeting 10/1/19 - Public Comment; Kayla Gorman Good Afternoon, I am writing to express my concerns and opposition to the resolution that supports the removal of the personal conviction vaccine exemption that will be voted on during tomorrows Marathon County Board Meeting. I've included my detailed comments below, along with references and educational handouts from Physicians for Informed Consent that further support my comments below. Please vote NO and leave this decision between parents and their health care provider. My name is Kayla Gorman and I am a mother to a 19-month-old and have another baby on the way. The one size fits all vaccine policies and laws, which fail to respect biodiversity and force everyone to be treated the same, places an unfair risk on a minority of unidentified individuals that are unable to survive vaccination without being harmed. Parents can, in partnership with their child’s health care provider, make informed decisions that best suits their family and their own medical history, whether that decision be to fully vaccinate according to the CDC schedule, partially vaccinate, vaccinate on an alternative schedule or not vaccinate at all. Prior to any medical procedure, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Flub; Diversity Deficiency
    Spectrum | Autism Research News https://www.spectrumnews.org SPOTTED New numbers; film flub; diversity deficiency BY KATIE MOISSE 1 APRIL 2016 WEEK OF MARCH 28TH New numbers After ticking up since 2000, the rate of autism among 8-year-olds in the U.S. may be leveling off. One in 68 school-age children have autism, according to data released yesterday by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The same rate was reported in 2014, marking a possible plateau in autism prevalence. The CDC cautions, however, that it’s too soon to tell whether the rate is truly stabilizing. Late last year, the agency reported that 1 in 45 children have autism, based on a different surveillance method. Prevalence also varies dramatically between states, with New Jersey reporting a rate of 1 in 41 compared with Maryland’s 1 in 123. SOURCES: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention / 31 Mar 2016 CDC estimates 1 in 68 school-aged children have autism; no change from previous estimate http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/p0331-children-autism.html Film flub First it was on, then it was off. Now it’s back on again. “Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe,” a film directed by the disbarred doctor Andrew Wakefield, will debut today at New York City’s Angelika Theater. 1 / 4 Spectrum | Autism Research News https://www.spectrumnews.org It’s not the venue the film’s makers had hoped for. “Vaxxed” was slated to premier at the prestigious Tribeca Film Festival, co-founded by actor Robert de Niro, who says he has a son with autism.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissemination of Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter and Its Countermeasures
    Dissertation Dissemination of Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter and Its Countermeasures Christine Chen This document was submitted as a dissertation in March 2021 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Luke Matthews (Chair), Sarah Nowak and Jeremy Miles. The external reader was Jennifer Golbeck. This dissertation was generously supported by the Anne and James Rothenberg Dissertation Award. PARDEE RAND GRADUATE SCHOOL For more information on this publication, visit http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSDA1332-1.html Published 2021 by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. is a registered trademarK Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademarK(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is reQuired from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help maKe communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND MaKe a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Abstract Outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases have continued to affect many parts of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Neurodiverse Students on Campus and Beyond
    Supporting Neurodiverse Students on Campus and Beyond Eric R. Mitchell, PhD [email protected] [email protected] Amy D. Edwards, Ed.D. [email protected] with Drexel Students Armon Owlia, Robert Barton, and Morgan Murtagh 4th Annual Philadelphia Autism Project Conference “Journey through the Lifespan: Mapping Your Path” In collaboration with Ruttenberg Autism Center and Drexel University October 18, 2019 Objectives: Statistics on the low rates of college success and under-employment for individuals diagnosed on the spectrum are staggering. Developing programs that individualize supports for students are essential for successful transitions. This workshop will explore components of successful transition planning starting at 14 years of age under IDEA, continuing through the college years with ADA accommodations, and preparing graduates for success in vocational settings in the workplace. Ruttenberg Autism Center and Drexel’s DASP program have supported such success, and will discuss with students how these supports have promoted their own educational and vocational trajectories toward a more successful future. Describe components of transition planning that predict success in college and work settings. Identify how colleges can successfully assist neurodiverse students to overcome challenges. Summarize how a local university and service provider are collaborating to address the increasing need for autism accommodations in higher education, leading to success in the workplace. Your Questions….Answered! o On the index card, please write a question you would like answered in this presentation o We will incorporate those answers as we talk! What is Neurodiversity? - Definition - Neurodiversity is a concept where neurological differences are recognized and respected just as any other difference.
    [Show full text]