THE LEGEND of the HERO PERGAMUS the Legend of Pergamus Did Not Occupy an Important Position in Greek Mythology to Judge From

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE LEGEND of the HERO PERGAMUS the Legend of Pergamus Did Not Occupy an Important Position in Greek Mythology to Judge From THE LEGEND OF THE HERO PERGAMUS The legend of Pergamus did not occupy an important position in Greek mythology to judge from the few references to it in ancient literature and from its absence in ancient iconography. But, though a minor hero, Pergamus was featured in the dynastic propaganda of at least two dynas- ties, the Pyrrhides of Epirus and the Attalids of Pergamon. This paper will review the development of the the myth of Pergamus, its importance in the state propaganda of Epirus and Pergamon, as well as the evidence for this hero’s cult under the Attalids. Pergamus’s story can be partly reconstructed from scattered accounts by Pausanias, Servius, and Euripides’s scholiast1. According to the most popular version, this hero was the youngest of the three sons of Andro- mache and Neoptolemus, and a grandson of Achilles. After the murder of Neoptolemus, Andromache fled to Epirus, married Helenus, her first husband’s brother, and together they founded the city of Chaonia whose citadel was named Pergamon, after Troy2. The eldest son, Molossus, became king of the Molossians in Epirus, while the second son, Pielus, founded and ruled the neighboring Pialeia. The third son, Pergamus, left Greece at the request of his friend Grynus, grandson of Telephus, who was at war with the Mysian kingdom of Teuthrania. Pergamus slew 1 Pausanias I 11.1-2; Servius, Verg. Ecl. VI 72; Schol. ad Euripidem Andr. 24.5-6; 32.5-6. Euphorion was the source for Servius’s account of the myth of Pergamos; see: A. MEINEKE, Analecta Alexandrina, Berlin 1843, p. 78, Frg. 46. 2 Chaon was one of the brothers of Helenus who was either killed during a hunting accident or offered his life voluntarily to save his countrymen from an epidemic. The city of Chaonia and the Chaones, an Epirotan tribe, were allegedly named after him. The Epirotan citadel of Pergamon is mentioned by Vergil in his account of Aeneas’s visit to Epirus where Helenus and Andromache ruled. See Vergil, Aeneid III 294-355. For refer- ences of Troy as Pergamon in Homer see: Iliad IV 508; V 446, 460; VI 512; VII 21; XXIV 700. Other Greek authors called Troy by that name. See Greek Anthology III 119; IV 87; Pseudo-Apollodorus I 2.103; Apollonius I 130; Aristotle, Mir. 834a; VIII 50.640; Constantinus VII Porphyrogenitus Imperator II 1.190; Euripides, Androm. 292; Troad. 557, 599, 851, 1065, 1296, 1325; Hel. 384; Phoin. 1098, 1176; Or. 1388; Iph.A. 589, 762, 773, 1576; Telephos Fr. 148.3; Eustathius, Schol. Il. IV 797; II 120; II 373; III 668; IV 600; IV 893; IV 974-975; Hellanicus, FGrHist 4 F26a and 31; Herodotus VII 43.5; Hesychius III pi.1548; Ibycus I 1a.8; Frg S224.7; Plato, Phaidr. 243a-b; Quintus Smyr- naeus XII 482; XIII 434; Schol. ad Ael. Arist. Pan. 168.3; Schol. ad Nicandrum 668- 672.3; Schol. ad Pindarum Ol. VIII 55a-55c; Isthm. VI 45a; Sophocles, Phil. 347, 353, 611; Stesichorus XV 3; Suda alpha. 2762. 134 E. KOSMETATOU Teuthrania’s king, Areius, took over his throne, and then renamed the capital after himself. Only one descendant of Pergamus is known from the sources, his grandson Prax, who founded a cult of his great-great- grandfather Achilles in Laconia3. It is generally accepted that the myth of Pergamus was first fabricated and promoted by the Epirotan dynasty of the Pyrrhides and then by Alexander the Great4. The kings of Epirus traced their descent to the Aeacides Neoptolemus and his father Achilles, who ruled over Thessaly and were both heroes of the Trojan War. The earliest mention of the special position that Neoptolemus occupied in Epirotan mythology is in Pindar (518-438 B.C.). According to this poet, after the Trojan War, Neoptolemus lost his way back home to Skyros and wandered until he reached Epirus where he ruled over the Molossians under the name of Pyrrhus. He was eventually murdered in Delphi, and a cult in his honor was established in Epirus5. Bottin associated the birth of this story with the traditionally good relations between Epirus and Thessaly which are mentioned by Herodotus and have also been archaeologically attested6. Homer was probably not familiar with this twist in Neoptolemus’s fate, since he refers to the hero’s uneventful return home to Phthia in Thes- saly and to his marriage with the daughter of Menelaus and Helen, Hermione7. Neither Pindar nor Homer mention any descendants of Neoptolemus. We may thus assume that sometime between the 8th and the early 5th centuries B.C., Neoptolemus was established as the mythological Patriarch of the Royal House of the Pyrrhides of Epirus. Since most of 3 W. GÖBER, art. Pergamos, in RE XIX 1 (1937), col. 691-692. About Prax, Perga- mus’s grandson, see Pausanias III 20.8; Stephanus Byzantinus, s.v. Prákiai. There was undoubtedly an ancient legend, according to which Prax left Epirus and migrated to Laco- nia where he founded the city of Prakiae. 4 H. GUDEMAN, art. Lysimachos, in RE XIV 1 (1928), col. 32 no. 20; also M. SCHMIDT, art. Lanassa, in RE XII 1 (1924), col. 617 no. 1; W. GÖBER, art. cit. (n. 3), col. 691-692. E. HANSEN argued, unconvincingly to my opinion, that the myth of Pergamus was invented by the Attalids; see The Attalids of Pergamon, Ithaca 19712, p. 7. 5 Pindar, Nem. IV 82; VII 34-35. The second poem was written in ca. 467 B.C. The same legend is mentioned by later authors. Cf. Aristotle, Ars Poetica 23, 1459b5; Proclus, in Apollodorus, Epit. VI 12; Pausanias I 11.1. 6 Herodotus VII 176; C. BOTIN, Les tribus et les dynastes d’Épire avant l’influence macédonienne, Musée Belge 29 (1925), p. 67-76. Close trade relations between Epirus and Thessaly have been attested as early as the prehistoric period. See D. EVANGELIDIS, ˆJpeirwtikaì ‰Ereunai, ˆJpeirwtikà Xroniká 10 (1935), p. 260-292; P. LEMERLE, Chronique des fouilles et découvertes archéologiques: Dodone (1), BCH 60 (1936), p. 473. 7 Homer, Od. III 189; IV 1-9. THE LEGEND OF THE HERO PERGAMUS 135 the Epic Cycle and Lyric poetry are lost today, we cannot be certain of the form that the legend of Neoptolemus had taken by the mid-5th cen- tury B.C. According to Hellanicus (5th century B.C.), Helenus, Aeneas, and other Trojan heroes played a major role, together with Neoptolemus, in the legends surrounding the mythological origins of the Pyrrhides8. By the time Euripides produced his Andromache in the 420s B.C., another version of the legend of the Aeacides was put forward9. Accord- ing to this version, Neoptolemus lived in Phthia as the heir apparent of his grandfather, Peleus and was murdered in Delphi by his wife, Hermione and Orestes, her cousin and lover. This event forced his con- cubine, Andromache, the former princess of Troy, and their only son, Molossus, to flee to Epirus where she married Helenus. Molossus even- tually became the first king of the Molossians and the founder of the Pyrrhide dynasty10. Carl Robert and Hammond suggested that the association of Andro- mache with Helenus and Epirus was an invention of Euripides which was later further developed by other authors. Andromache is thus considered a political play with which Euripides sought to promote the policy of Athens to bring Chaonia and Molossia to its side during the Peloponnesian War. Bottin and Nestle associated the production of Andromache with the official visit of Tharyps, king of the Molossians, to Athens in the 420s B.C. and his award of Athenian citizenship11. Bot- tin goes even further and suggests that since, according to the ancient sources, the play was produced outside Athens, it is very probable that it 8 F. JACOBY, FGrHist 4 F84. For the same version of the story see also Theopompus of Chios (4th century B.C.), FGrHist 115, vol. IIB, p. 526-536; IIIB, p. 742; Teucrus of Cyzicus in Stephanus Byzantinus, s.v. Bouqrwtóv. Cf. Dionysius of Halicarnassus I 51; Dio Chrysostomos, Or. XI 361-362. 9 For a discussion of the date of the Andromache, see U. VON WILAMOWITZ-MOELLEN- DORFF, Analecta Euripidea, Berlin 1875, p. 148; G. MURRAY, Euripidis Fabulae (Oxford Classical Texts), 1903, in dramatis personae following Wilamowitz; W. KRANZ, Stasi- mon: Untersuchungen zu Form und Gehalt der griechischen Tragödie, Berlin 1933, p. 175, 182; A. GARZYA, Intorno all’ Andromaca di Euripide, GIF 5 (1952), p. 346-366; G. ZUNTZ, The Political Plays of Euripides, Manchester 1955, p. 88-93; R. GOOSENS, Euripide et Athènes (Academie Royale de Belgique. Mémoires, 55), Bruxelles 1962, p. 387- 394, 401-410; P.T. STEPHENS, Euripides. Andromache, Oxford 1971, p. 15-21. 10 Euripides, Androm. 24, 1243-1247; also Dio of Prusa XI 137. Euripides stresses that Molossus was the only son of Neoptolemus. Cf. Andr. 24-28, particularly 47 (Ωv d’ ∂sti pa⁄v moi mónov), and 1246-1247 (kaì pa⁄da tónde, t¬n âp’ AîakoÕ mónon leleimménon dß). The same version of the myth is narrated by Strabo XIII 1.27; Pausa- nias I 11.1, II 23.6. 11 See IG II2 226 = Syll.3 656. 136 E. KOSMETATOU was also commissioned by Tharyps, and that it premiered at the court of Molossia12. It is true that Euripides’s fascination with rare and non-traditional leg- ends was exploited at least twice by two culturally insecure dynasties, the Argeads of Macedonia and the Attalids of Pergamon who needed to advertise their disputed Greek origins. King Archelaus of Macedonia commissioned a homonymous play by Euripides in ca.
Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Artaxerxes II
    Artaxerxes II John Shannahan BAncHist (Hons) (Macquarie University) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Ancient History, Macquarie University. May, 2015. ii Contents List of Illustrations v Abstract ix Declaration xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Conventions xv Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 THE EARLY REIGN OF ARTAXERXES II The Birth of Artaxerxes to Cyrus’ Challenge 15 The Revolt of Cyrus 41 Observations on the Egyptians at Cunaxa 53 Royal Tactics at Cunaxa 61 The Repercussions of the Revolt 78 CHAPTER 2 399-390: COMBATING THE GREEKS Responses to Thibron, Dercylidas, and Agesilaus 87 The Role of Athens and the Persian Fleet 116 Evagoras the Opportunist and Carian Commanders 135 Artaxerxes’ First Invasion of Egypt: 392/1-390/89? 144 CHAPTER 3 389-380: THE KING’S PEACE AND CYPRUS The King’s Peace (387/6): Purpose and Influence 161 The Chronology of the 380s 172 CHAPTER 4 NUMISMATIC EXPRESSIONS OF SOLIDARITY Coinage in the Reign of Artaxerxes 197 The Baal/Figure in the Winged Disc Staters of Tiribazus 202 Catalogue 203 Date 212 Interpretation 214 Significance 223 Numismatic Iconography and Egyptian Independence 225 Four Comments on Achaemenid Motifs in 227 Philistian Coins iii The Figure in the Winged Disc in Samaria 232 The Pertinence of the Political Situation 241 CHAPTER 5 379-370: EGYPT Planning for the Second Invasion of Egypt 245 Pharnabazus’ Invasion of Egypt and Aftermath 259 CHAPTER 6 THE END OF THE REIGN Destabilisation in the West 267 The Nature of the Evidence 267 Summary of Current Analyses 268 Reconciliation 269 Court Intrigue and the End of Artaxerxes’ Reign 295 Conclusion: Artaxerxes the Diplomat 301 Bibliography 309 Dies 333 Issus 333 Mallus 335 Soli 337 Tarsus 338 Unknown 339 Figures 341 iv List of Illustrations MAP Map 1 Map of the Persian Empire xviii-xix Brosius, The Persians, 54-55 DIES Issus O1 Künker 174 (2010) 403 333 O2 Lanz 125 (2005) 426 333 O3 CNG 200 (2008) 63 333 O4 Künker 143 (2008) 233 333 R1 Babelon, Traité 2, pl.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Power and Politics in the Mycenaean World and Its Reflection in the Homeric Epic: the Iliad
    Near East University (NEU) Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Department of International Relations The Evolution of Power and Politics in the Mycenaean World and its Reflection in the Homeric Epic: the Iliad By: Nicolaie A. Şorodoc We certify that the thesis is satisfactory for the award of the Degree of Master of International Relations Examining committee: Prof. Dr. Levent Köker Faculty of Law, Department of Law, NEU Prof. Dr. Jouni Suistola Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations, NEU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ali Efdal Özkul Faculty of Education, Department of History Teaching, NEU Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Aykut Polatoğlu 1 Jury Report June, 2010 Student Info: Full Name Nicolaie Alin Şorodoc Faculty Economics and Administrative Sciences Institution Near East University Department International Relations Thesis Info: Title: The Evolution of Power and Politics in the Mycenaean World and its Reflection in the Homeric Epic the Iliad Abstract: This study tries to go beyond the boundaries of present day issues and examine the evolution of power and politics of the Mycenaean people during the Bronze Age. At each stage, be it big-man leadership, chiefdom or state based society I examine how power and social complexity increases and what were the reasons behind such a phenomenon. I start with some few considerations regarding developments during the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age and then I jump to the question of the “coming of the Greeks.” I argue that any explanation of the political life shall start from early stages; it is only then that we might get a measured insight in respect to the workings of political and social institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomasz Grabowski Jagiellonian University, Kraków*
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 21 (2014): 21–41 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.14.001.2778 www.ejournals.eu/electrum THE CULT OF THE PTOLEMIES IN THE AEGEAN IN THE 3RD CENTURY BC Tomasz Grabowski Jagiellonian University, Kraków* Abstract: The cult of the Ptolemies spread in various ways. Apart from the Lagids, the initiative came from poleis themselves; private cult was also very important. The ruler cult, both that organ- ised directly by the Ptolemaic authorities and that established by poleis, was tangibly benefi cial for the Ptolemaic foreign policy. The dynastic cult became one of the basic instruments of political activity in the region, alongside acts of euergetism. It seems that Ptolemy II played the biggest role in introducing the ruler cult as a foreign policy measure. He was probably responsible for bringing his father’s nickname Soter to prominence. He also played the decisive role in popularising the cult of Arsinoe II, emphasising her role as protector of sailors and guarantor of the monarchy’s prosperity and linking her to cults accentuating the warrior nature of female deities. Ptolemy II also used dynastic festivals as vehicles of dynastic propaganda and ideology and a means to popu- larise the cult. The ruler cult became one of the means of communication between the subordinate cities and the Ptolemies. It also turned out to be an important platform in contacts with the poleis which were loosely or not at all subjugated by the Lagids. The establishment of divine honours for the Ptolemies by a polis facilitated closer relations and created a friendly atmosphere and a certain emotional bond.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiochus I Soter
    Antiochus I Soter home : ancient Persia : ancient Greece : Seleucids : index : article by Jona Lendering Antiochus I Soter Antiochus I Soter ('the savior'): name of a Seleucid king, ruled from 281 to 261. Successor of: Seleucus I Nicator Relatives: Father: Seleucus I Nicator Coin of Antiochus I Soter Mother: Apame I, daughter of Spitamenes (Museum of Anatolian Wife: Stratonice I (his stepmother), daughter of Demetrius Civilizations, Ankara) Poliorcetes Children: Seleucus Laodice Apame II (married to Magas of Cyrene) Stratonice II (married to Demetrius II of Macedonia) Antiochus II Theos Main deeds: 301: Present during the Battle of Ipsus 294/293: marriage with his father's wife Stratonice I 292: made co-regent and satrap of Bactria (perhaps Seleucus was thinking of the ancient Achaemenid office of mathišta) Stay in Babylon (on several occasions?), where he showed an interest in the cults of Sin and Marduk, and in the rebuilding of the Esagila and Etemenanki September 281: death of Seleucus (more...); accession of Antiochus; Philetaerus of Pergamon buys back Seleucus' corpse 280-279: Brief war against Ptolemy II Philadelphus (First Syrian War, first part); Cappadocia becomes independent when its leader Ariarathes II and his ally Orontes III of Armenia defeat the Seleucid general Amyntas 279: Intervention in Greece: soldiers sent to Thermopylae to fight against the Galatians; they are defeated 275 Successful "Elephant Battle" against the Galatians; they enter his army as mercenaries; Antiochus is called Soter, 'victor' 274-271: Unsuccessful war against Ptolemy (First Syrian War, second part) 268: Stay in Babylonia; rebuilding of the Ezida in Borsippa 266: Execution of his son Seleucus 263: Eumenes I of Pergamon, successor of Philetaerus, declares himself independent 262: Antiochus defeated by Eumenes Page 1 Antiochus I Soter 262: Antiochus defeated by Eumenes Dies 2 June 261 Succeeded by: Antiochus II Theos Sources: During Antiochus' years as crown prince, he played a large role in Babylonian policy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Literary Sources
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82860-4 — The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest 2nd Edition Index More Information Index A Literary sources Livy XXVI.24.7–15: 77 (a); XXIX.12.11–16: 80; XXXI.44.2–9: 11 Aeschines III.132–4: 82; XXXIII.38: 195; XXXVII.40–1: Appian, Syrian Wars 52–5, 57–8, 62–3: 203; XXXVIII.34: 87; 57 XXXIX.24.1–4: 89; XLI.20: 209 (b); ‘Aristeas to Philocrates’ I.9–11 and XLII.29–30.7: 92; XLII.51: 94; 261 V.35–40: XLV.29.3–30 and 32.1–7: 96 15 [Aristotle] Oeconomica II.2.33: I Maccabees 1.1–9: 24; 1.10–25 and 5 7 Arrian, Alexander I.17: ; II.14: ; 41–56: 217; 15.1–9: 221 8 9 III.1.5–2.2: (a); III.3–4: ; II Maccabees 3.1–3: 216 12 13 IV.10.5–12.5: ; V.28–29.1: ; Memnon, FGrH 434 F 11 §§5.7–11: 159 14 20 V1.27.3–5: ; VII.1.1–4: ; Menander, The Sicyonian lines 3–15: 104 17 18 VII.4.4–5: ; VII.8–9 and 11: Menecles of Barca FGrHist 270F9:322 26 Arrian, FGrH 156 F 1, §§1–8: (a); F 9, Pausanias I.7: 254; I.9.4: 254; I.9.5–10: 30 §§34–8: 56; I.25.3–6: 28; VII.16.7–17.1: Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae V.201b–f, 100 258 43 202f–203e: ; VI.253b–f: Plutarch, Agis 5–6.1 and 7.5–8: 69 23 Augustine, City of God 4.4: Alexander 10.6–11: 3 (a); 15: 4 (a); Demetrius of Phalerum, FGrH 228 F 39: 26.3–10: 8 (b); 68.3: cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Higher Aspects of Greek Religion. Lectures Delivered at Oxford and In
    BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIET OF Henirg m. Sage 1891 .A^^^ffM3. islm^lix.. 5931 CornelJ University Library BL 25.H621911 The higher aspects of Greek religion.Lec 3 1924 007 845 450 The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924007845450 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES 1911 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES THE HIGHER ASPECTS OF GREEK RELIGION LECTURES DELIVERED AT OXFORD AND IN LONDON IN APRIL AND MAY igii BY L. R. FARNELL, D.Litt. WILDE LECTURER IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD LONDON WILLIAMS AND NORGATE GARDEN, W.C. 14 HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT 1912 CONTENTS Lecture I GENERAL FEATURES AND ORIGINS OF GREEK RELIGION Greek religion mainly a social-political system, 1. In its earliest " period a " theistic creed, that is^ a worship of personal individual deities, ethical personalities rather than mere nature forces, 2. Anthrqgomorphism its predominant bias, 2-3. Yet preserving many primitive features of " animism " or " animatism," 3-5. Its progress gradual without violent break with its distant past, 5-6. The ele- ment of magic fused with the religion but not predominant, 6-7. Hellenism and Hellenic religion a blend of two ethnic strains, one North-Aryan, the other Mediterranean, mainly Minoan-Mycenaean, 7-9. Criteria by which we can distinguish the various influences of these two, 9-1 6. The value of Homeric evidence, 18-20. Sum- mary of results, 21-24. Lecture II THE RELIGIOUS BOND AND MORALITY OF THE FAMILY The earliest type of family in Hellenic society patrilinear, 25-27.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coins from the Necropolis "Metlata" Near the Village of Rupite
    margarita ANDONOVA the coins from the necropolis "metlata" near the village of rupite... THE COINS FROM THE NECROPOLIS METLATA NEAR THE VILLAGE "OF RUPITE" (F. MULETAROVO), MUNICIPALITY OF PETRICH by Margarita ANDONOVA, Regional Museum of History– Blagoevgrad This article sets to describe and introduce known as Charon's fee was registered through the in scholarly debate the numismatic data findspots of the coins on the skeleton; specifically, generated during the 1985-1988 archaeological these coins were found near the head, the pelvis, excavations at one of the necropoleis situated in the left arm and the legs. In cremations in situ, the locality "Metlata" near the village of Rupite. coins were placed either inside the grave or in The necropolis belongs to the long-known urns made of stone or clay, as well as in bowls "urban settlement" situated on the southern placed next to them. It is noteworthy that out of slopes of Kozhuh hill, at the confluence of 167 graves, coins were registered only in 52, thus the Strumeshnitsa and Struma Rivers, and accounting for less than 50%. The absence of now identified with Heraclea Sintica. The coins in some graves can probably be attributed archaeological excavations were conducted by to the fact that "in Greek society, there was no Yulia Bozhinova from the Regional Museum of established dogma about the way in which the History, Blagoevgrad. souls of the dead travelled to the realm of Hades" The graves number 167 and are located (Зубарь 1982, 108). According to written sources, within an area of ​​750 m². Coins were found mainly Euripides, it is clear that the deceased in 52 graves, both Hellenistic and Roman, may be accompanied to the underworld not only and 10 coins originate from areas (squares) by Charon, but also by Hermes or Thanatos.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Divine Vintage Turkey & Greece
    BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Neapolis Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Abdera Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA JOINAllante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Elimia PydnaMEDITERRANEAN Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Dasaki Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos Torone Hephaistia Dorylaeum BOZCAADA Sigeion Kenchreai Omphatium Gonnus Skione Limnos MYSIA Uludag ESKİŞEHİR Eritium DIVINE VINTAGE Derecik Basilica Sidari Oxynia Myrina Kaz Mt. Passaron Soufli Troas Kebrene Skepsis UNESCO Meliboea Cassiope Gure bath BALIKESİR Dikilitaş Kanlıtaş Höyük Aiginion Neandra Karacahisar Castle Meteora Antandros Adramyttium Corfu UNESCO Larissa Lamponeia Dodoni Theopetra Gülpinar Pioniai Kulluoba Hamaxitos Seyitömer Höyük Keçi çayırı Syvota KÜTAHYA Grava Polimedion Assos Gerdekkaya Assos Mt.Pelion A E GTURKEY E A N S E A &Pyrrha GREECEMadra Mt. (Cotiaeum) Kumbet Lefkimi Theudoria Pherae Mithymna Midas City Ellina EPIRUS Passandra Perperene Lolkos/Gorytsa Antissa Bahses Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander and the 'Defeat' of the Sogdianian Revolt
    Alexander the Great and the “Defeat” of the Sogdianian Revolt* Salvatore Vacante “A victory is twice itself when the achiever brings home full numbers” (W. Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing, Act I, Scene I) (i) At the beginning of 329,1 the flight of the satrap Bessus towards the northeastern borders of the former Persian Empire gave Alexander the Great the timely opportunity for the invasion of Sogdiana.2 This ancient region was located between the Oxus (present Amu-Darya) and Iaxartes (Syr-Darya) Rivers, where we now find the modern Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, bordering on the South with ancient Bactria (present Afghanistan). According to literary sources, the Macedonians rapidly occupied this large area with its “capital” Maracanda3 and also built, along the Iaxartes, the famous Alexandria Eschate, “the Farthermost.”4 However, during the same year, the Sogdianian nobles Spitamenes and Catanes5 were able to create a coalition of Sogdianians, Bactrians and Scythians, who created serious problems for Macedonian power in the region, forcing Alexander to return for the winter of 329/8 to the largest city of Bactria, Zariaspa-Bactra.6 The chiefs of the revolt were those who had *An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Conflict Archaeology Postgraduate Conference organized by the Centre for Battlefield Archaeology of the University of Glasgow on October 7th – 9th 2011. 1 Except where differently indicated, all the dates are BCE. 2 Arr. 3.28.10-29.6. 3 Arr. 3.30.6; Curt. 7.6.10: modern Samarkand. According to Curtius, the city was surrounded by long walls (70 stades, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Wai Kit Wicky Tse University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Tse, Wai Kit Wicky, "Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 589. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Abstract As a frontier region of the Qin-Han (221BCE-220CE) empire, the northwest was a new territory to the Chinese realm. Until the Later Han (25-220CE) times, some portions of the northwestern region had only been part of imperial soil for one hundred years. Its coalescence into the Chinese empire was a product of long-term expansion and conquest, which arguably defined the egionr 's military nature. Furthermore, in the harsh natural environment of the region, only tough people could survive, and unsurprisingly, the region fostered vigorous warriors. Mixed culture and multi-ethnicity featured prominently in this highly militarized frontier society, which contrasted sharply with the imperial center that promoted unified cultural values and stood in the way of a greater degree of transregional integration. As this project shows, it was the northwesterners who went through a process of political peripheralization during the Later Han times played a harbinger role of the disintegration of the empire and eventually led to the breakdown of the early imperial system in Chinese history.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece, the Land Where Myths Replaces Reality
    GREECE, THE LAND WHERE MYTHS REPLACE REALITY (Myths about Epirus) What is myth and what does it serve? Myth is a narrative based usually on a false story which can not be used as a replacement of history, but sometimes myth might be considered a distorted account of a real historical event. The myth does not differ much from a folktale and usually the boundary between them is very thin. Myth must not be used to reconstruct, however in the ancient society of the so called “”Ancient Greeks”” myth was usually regarded as a true account for a remote past. Surprisingly this ‘tradition’ is descended to the Modern Greeks as well. They never loose the chance to use the myths and the mythology of a remote past and to pose them as their real ethnic history. This job is being done combining the ancient myths with the ones already created in the modern era. Now let’s take a look at two Greek myths, respectively one ancient and one modern, while our job is to prove that even these myths are respectively hijacked or created to join realities not related to each other, but unfortunately propagandized belonging to a real history, the history of the Greek race. Thus before we analyze and expose some of their myths which are uncountable, we are inclined to say that whatever is considered Greek History is completely based on mythical stories, whose reliability and truthiness is deeply compromised for the mere fact that is based on myths not only by the Modern Greeks and especially philhellenes, but even by the ancient authors.
    [Show full text]