Attenuation of the Effects of Corticosteroids on Declarative Memory with Lamotrigine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Attenuation of the Effects of Corticosteroids on Declarative Memory with Lamotrigine Neuropsychopharmacology (2008) 33, 2376–2383 & 2008 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/08 $30.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Attenuation of the Effects of Corticosteroids on Declarative Memory with Lamotrigine ,1 1 1 2 1 E Sherwood Brown* , Justin Wolfshohl , Mujeeb U Shad , Miguel Vazquez and I Julian Osuji 1 2 Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA An extensive animal literature suggests that excessive corticosteroid exposure is associated with changes in memory and the hippocampus. Agents that decrease glutamate attenuate corticosteroid effects on the hippocampus. Minimal data are available on preventing or reversing corticosteroid effects on the human hippocampus. We previously reported that open-label lamotrigine was associated with significant improvement in declarative memory in corticosteroid-treated patients. We now examine the impact of 24 weeks of randomized, placebo-controlled lamotrigine therapy on declarative memory (primary aim) and hippocampal volume (secondary aim) in 28 patients (n ¼ 16 for lamotrigine, n ¼ 12 for placebo) taking prescription corticosteroids. All participants with data from at least one postbaseline assessment (n ¼ 9 for lamotrigine, n ¼ 11 for placebo) were included in the analysis. Declarative memory was assessed with the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) at baseline and weeks 12 and 24. Hippocampal and total brain volumes were manually traced from MRI scans obtained at baseline and week 24. On the basis of an ANCOVA analysis, total words learned on the RAVLT at exit were significantly greater in the lamotrigine group (n ¼ 8, missing data or dropouts n ¼ 8) compared to the placebo group (n ¼ 11, dropout n ¼ 1). RAVLT scores in the lamotrigine group increased from mildly impaired to average range. Hippocampal volume changes were small in both lamotrigine (n ¼ 7) and placebo (n ¼ 7) groups during the 24-week assessment period and between-group differences were not significant. Results suggest that lamotrigine may improve declarative memory in patients taking prescription corticosteroids although differential dropout rate in the two groups is a concern. Neuropsychopharmacology (2008) 33, 2376–2383; doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301627; published online 14 November 2007 Keywords: corticosteroids; lamotrigine; memory; hippocampus INTRODUCTION the effects of corticosteroids on the human hippocampus is challenging since humans cannot ethically be administered An extensive literature suggests that stress or excessive corticosteroids for extended periods of time. Therefore, a corticosteroid exposure is associated with changes in much smaller human literature on the effects of corticos- memory and hippocampal structure in animals (Magarin˜os teroids on the hippocampus is available. Acute administra- et al, 1997; Vyas et al, 2002; Uno et al, 1989, 1994; Sapolsky tion of exogenous corticosteroids in humans is associated et al, 1990; Lupien and McEwen, 1997). Leverenz et al with decline in declarative memory performance (New- (1999) did not find overall between-group differences in comer et al, 1999; de Quervain et al, 2000; Brown et al, 2006; total hippocampal or subfield volumes, neuronal number, Bender et al, 1988). Patients with Cushing’s disease, and or density in older macaques given oral hydrocortisone for cortisol elevations secondary to ACTH-producing pituitary 12 months. However, they found a strong negative tumors, have memory impairment (Mauri et al, 1993; correlation between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cortisol levels Starkman and Schteingart, 1981) and hippocampal atrophy and hippocampal volume (r ¼ 0.83, p 0.05) (Leverenz et al, p (Starkman et al, 1992) that are at least partially reversible a 2003). In animals, agents that decrease glutamate release or mean of 17 months after surgery to normalize cortisol levels enhance serotonin reuptake attenuate the effects of (Starkman et al, 1999, 2003). corticosteroids on the hippocampus (Magarin˜os and We reported that patients receiving long-term corticos- McEwen, 1995; Magarin˜os et al, 1996, 1999; Luine et al, teroid therapy had significantly poorer declarative memory 1994; Conrad et al, 1996; Watanabe et al, 1992). Examining performance, lower temporal lobe levels of N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), and smaller hippocampal volumes than *Correspondence: Dr ES Brown, Department of Psychiatry, University controls with similar medical histories not taking corticos- of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, teroids (Brown et al, 2004). However, another report did not Dallas, TX 75390-8849, USA, Tel: + 1 214 645-6950, Fax: + 1 214 find a reduction in NAA levels in patients taking 645-6951, E-mail: [email protected] corticosteroids (Khiat et al, 2001), and no changes in Received 16 May 2007; accepted 21 September 2007 hippocampal volume (Hajek et al, 2006) or post-mortem Effects of corticosteroids on declarative memory ES Brown et al 2377 histology (Lucassen et al, 2001) were found during Diagnostic and Declarative Memory Assessment corticosteroid exposure that was of much shorter duration A structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID-CV) (First than in our report (Brown et al, 2004). et al, 1995) was administered at baseline to assess past and We previously reported significant improvement in current psychiatric diagnoses that were exclusionary. The declarative memory in corticosteroid-treated patients given Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (Schmidt, open-label lamotrigine (Brown et al, 2003), an antiseizure and mood-stabilizing medication that inhibits glutamate 1996) was administered at baseline and weeks 12 and 24 follow-up, by a blinded staff member, with extensive release through modulation of high voltage-activated training and experience to assess declarative memory, using calcium currents (Stefani et al, 1997; Pisani et al, 2004; alternate versions (administered in a randomized order) to Wang et al, 2001) and sodium channels (Stefani et al, 1997; minimize practice or learning effects. The RAVLT consists Rogawski and Loscher, 2004; Sitges et al, 2007; Remy et al, of 15 nouns read aloud for five consecutive trials with each 2003). In this report we examined the impact of 24 weeks of trial followed by a free-recall trial. The total score is the total randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment number of words recalled through the five trials. Normative with lamotrigine on declarative memory in patients RAVLT T-scores controlling for age are reported. receiving prescription corticosteroids as the primary aim. A secondary aim was to examine whether between-group differences in hippocampal volume could be detected MRI and Procedures following 24 weeks of lamotrigine therapy. Structural and functional magnetic resonance (MR) images of the brain were obtained at baseline and week 24 follow- up visits. MR images were acquired on a General Electric METHODS Horizon LX NV/i 1.5 Tesla scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) using the standard GE Participants and Study Medication quadrature birdcage RF head coil. To avoid large head A total of 28 medically stable outpatients receiving chronic motions, each subject’s head was immobilized with tightly oral corticosteroid therapy participated in a 24-week fitting foam padding and a head strap that was fastened randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lamo- across the forehead. High-resolution T1 images of the entire trigine. The enrollment period was from August 2002 brain (3D Spoiled Grass (SPGR) pulse sequence: through March 2005 with the final week-24 assessment in TR ¼ 40 ms; TE ¼ 5 ms; flip angle ¼ 401; matrix ¼ 256 Â 256; October 2005. Participants were enrolled from clinics in the FOV ¼ 24; PFOV ¼ 0.75, NEX ¼ 1; slice thickness ¼ 1.7 mm) UT Southwestern Medical Center that treat patients with were acquired during the same scan session for each chronic oral corticosteroid therapy. Assessments and participant. interventions were conducted at the Psychoneuroendocrine Research Program clinic at UT Southwestern. Inclusion Structural MRI Volumetric Analysis criteria were age of 18–65 years and corticosteroid therapy of at least 7.5 mg of prednisone equivalents daily for at least Anatomical measurements were conducted by two trained 6 months. Exclusion criteria were drug or alcohol abuse or and reliable raters and were supervised by one of the dependence, illnesses associated with hippocampal atrophy authors (MUS), who, following training at Dr MS Kesha- or with significant CNS involvement (seizures, closed head van’s laboratory at the University of Pittsburgh, has injury with loss of consciousness, brain tumors, multiple conducted structural imaging analysis at the University of sclerosis), history of a depressive disorder not related to Pittsburgh and UT Southwestern since 2000 (Shad et al, corticosteroid therapy, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or 2004, 2006). BRAINS2 software (Magnotta et al, 2002) was posttraumatic stress disorder on a structured clinical used to conduct the measurements. Both raters were blind interview, mental retardation, dementia or other severe to participant identity, study group assignment, and clinical cognitive impairment, pregnant or nursing women, severe data. The scans were analyzed in pairs (baseline, week 24) or life-threatening medical illness which would make for each participant with the rater unaware of the
Recommended publications
  • Once-Daily Skeletal Muscle Relaxant in SA
    NEWS Once-daily skeletal muscle relaxant in SA Myprocam (cyclobenzaprine with spine-related disorders and other 8. What are the classes of muscle a protective coating, and a polymer extended release [ER] sports injuries are excellent candidates relaxants? membrane that controls the rate of hydrochloride) is the most widely for Myprocam. Skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs) are drug release. prescribed skeletal muscle a group of structurally unrelated drugs, The formulation of the drug relaxant in the US, is now available 4. What are the common as shown in Figure 1. These are divided ensures early systemic exposure in SA. Myprocam’s safety and efficacy indications for which Myprocam into two categories: to cyclobenzaprine, with a plasma has been shown in more than 20 clinical is used, and what are the common • Antispasticity agents: Used to concentration at four hours that trials. It was recently launched by causes of these ailments? treat muscle spasticity caused by is similar to that observed with Adcock Ingram nationally, making SA Low back pain, neck pain, sports traumatic neurologic injury, multiple cyclobenzaprine IR. the second country (only to the US) to injuries, muscle sprains and strains. sclerosis, and other conditions. However, in contrast to the bring the product to market. Common causes of these conditions • Antispasmodic agents: Used fluctuating peaks and troughs in Myprocam, indicated for the relief of include sports injuries, car accidents, to treat muscular pain or spasm plasma cyclobenzaprine concentration muscle spasm associated with acute work-related injuries, and everyday associated with acute, nonspecific after administration of the IR and painful musculoskeletal conditions, activities, which account for acute musculoskeletal conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Medications in Long-Term Care: When Less Is More
    Medications in Long-Term Care: When Less is More a, b,c Thomas W. Meeks, MD *, John W. Culberson, MD , d,e Monica S. Horton, MD, MSc KEYWORDS Long-term care Inappropriate prescribing Polypharmacy Psychotropics Opiates Sedatives HISTORY OF MEDICATION REDUCTION IN LONG-TERM CARE The Nursing Home Reform Act (OBRA-87) enacted in 1987 called for sweeping changes in the standards of care in nursing homes in accordance with new, more demanding federal regulations. For example, OBRA-87 called for a new approach to the use of antipsychotics in persons with dementia. Because antipsychotics were regarded as frequently inappropriate chemical restraints in long-term care (LTC), OBRA-87 mandated dose reductions in antipsychotics in an effort to discontinue them whenever possible. OBRA-87 proposed that a safer, more supportive environ- ment in LTC settings would facilitate such reductions in antipsychotic doses.1 Overall rates of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults have ranged from 12% to 40%, depending on the setting, criteria, and population sampled.2 Devel- oping from burgeoning concerns for polypharmacy and potential iatrogenic toxicity of medication in older adults, expert consensus lists of potentially inappropriate pharma- cotherapy in the elderly (PIPE) began to emerge. In general, drugs with activity in the central nervous system (CNS) were commonly placed on these PIPE lists, and hence our focus on such medications in this review. This work was supported by the following Geriatric Academic Career Awards: (1) K01 HP00047-02 (Dr. Meeks) (2) K01 HP00080-02 (Dr. Culberson) (3) K01 HP00114-02 (Dr. Horton). The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Class Review on Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
    Drug Class Review on Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Final Report Update 2 May 2005 Original Report Date: April 2003 Update 1 Report Date: January 2004 A literature scan of this topic is done periodically The purpose of this report is to make available information regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of different drugs within pharmaceutical classes. Reports are not usage guidelines, nor should they be read as an endorsement of, or recommendation for, any particular drug, use or approach. Oregon Health & Science University does not recommend or endorse any guideline or recommendation developed by users of these reports. Roger Chou, MD Kim Peterson, MS Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center Oregon Health & Science University Mark Helfand, MD, MPH, Director Copyright © 2005 by Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon 97201. All rights reserved. Note: A scan of the medical literature relating to the topic is done periodically (see http://www.ohsu.edu/ohsuedu/research/policycenter/DERP/about/methods.cfm for scanning process description). Upon review of the last scan, the Drug Effectiveness Review Project governance group elected not to proceed with another full update of this report. Some portions of the report may not be up to date. Prior versions of this report can be accessed at the DERP website. Final Report Update 2 Drug Effectiveness Review Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................................................................................................................4 Scope and
    [Show full text]
  • CYCLOBENZAPRINE (Brand Name: Flexeril®, Amrix®)
    Drug Enforcement Administration Diversion Control Division Drug & Chemical Evaluation Section CYCLOBENZAPRINE ® ® (Brand Name: Flexeril , Amrix ) March 2020 Introduction: Illicit Uses: Cyclobenzaprine is a central nervous system Anecdotal reports found on the Internet suggest (CNS) muscle relaxant intended for short-term use that individuals are taking cyclobenzaprine alone or in the treatment of pain, tenderness and limitation of in combination with other illicit drugs to produce or motion caused by muscle spasms. Cyclobenzaprine enhance psychoactive effects. Individuals have may enhance the effects of other CNS depressants reported taking cyclobenzadrine both orally and including alcohol, barbiturates, benzodiazepines intra-nasally at doses ranging from 10 mg to 60 mg. and narcotics and anecdotal reports indicate it is Sedation, relaxation and increased heart rate were used non-medically to induce euphoria and the most common effects reported. Euphoria was relaxation. reported by a smaller number of individuals. Licit Uses: Illicit Distribution: Cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride is approved for Several indicators suggest that cyclobenzaprine use in the United States as a muscle relaxant. It is is being intentionally misused or abused. According marketed under the brand names Flexeril® and to the American Association of Poison Control Amrix® and as generic formulations in 5, 7.5, and 10 Centers, 10,615 case mentions and 4,444 single mg tablets intended for short-term (2 to 3 week) oral exposures were associated with cyclobenzaprine in administration. The usual starting dose is 5 mg, 2016, resulting in 75 major medical outcomes and three times per day. The maximum recommended four deaths among single substance exposures. In dose is 10 mg, three times daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Moiety Name FDA Established Pharmacologic Class (EPC) Text
    FDA Established Pharmacologic Class (EPC) Text Phrase PLR regulations require that the following statement is included in the Highlights Indications and Usage heading if a drug is a member of an EPC [see 21 CFR 201.57(a)(6)]: “(Drug) is a (FDA EPC Text Phrase) indicated for [indication(s)].” For Active Moiety Name each listed active moiety, the associated FDA EPC text phrase is included in this document. For more information about how FDA determines the EPC Text Phrase, see the 2009 "Determining EPC for Use in the Highlights" guidance and 2013 "Determining EPC for Use in the Highlights" MAPP 7400.13. .alpha.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaesthetic Implications of Calcium Channel Blockers
    436 Anaesthetic implications of calcium channel Leonard C. Jenkins aA MD CM FRCPC blockers Peter J. Scoates a sc MD FRCPC CONTENTS The object of this review is to emphasize the anaesthetic implications of calcium channel block- Physiology - calcium/calcium channel blockers Uses of calcium channel blockers ers for the practising anaesthetist. These drugs have Traditional played an expanding role in therapeutics since their Angina pectoris introduction and thus anaesthetists can expect to see Arrhythmias increasing numbers of patients presenting for anaes- Hypertension thesia who are being treated with calcium channel Newer and investigational Cardiac blockers. Other reviews have emphasized the basic - Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pharmacology of calcium channel blockers. 1-7 - Cold cardioplegia - Pulmonary hypertension Physiology - calcium/calcium channel blockers Actions on platelets Calcium plays an important role in many physio- Asthma Obstetrics logical processes, such as blood coagulation, en- - Premature labor zyme systems, muscle contraction, bone metabo- - Pre-eclampsia lism, synaptic transmission, and cell membrane Achalasia and oesophageal spasm excitability. Especially important is the role of Increased intraocular pressure therapy calcium in myocardial contractility and conduction Protective effect on kidney after radiocontrast Cerebral vasospasm as well as in vascular smooth muscle reactivity. 7 Induced hypotensive anaesthesia Thus, it can be anticipated that any drug interfering Drag interactions with calcium channel blockers with the action of calcium could have widespread With anaesthetic agents effects. Inhalation agents In order to understand the importance of calcium - Effect on haemodynamics - Effect on MAC in cellular excitation, it is necessary to review some Neuromuscular blockers membrane physiology. Cell membranes are pri- Effects on epinephrine-induced arrhythmias marily phospholipids arranged in a bilayer.
    [Show full text]
  • Paracetamol/Chlorzoxazone
    PARACETAMOL/CHLORZOXAZONE TRADE NAME MYOLGIN™ NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Paracetamol / chlorzoxazone, 300 mg/250 mg, hard capsule QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each hard capsule contains 300 mg of paracetamol and 250 mg of chlorzoxazone. Excipients Gelatin, Magnesium stearate, Talc. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Hard gelatin capsules, purple opaque/pink printed Myolgin. CLINICAL INFORMATION Indications Paracetamol/chlorzoxazone is indicated for the treatment of: • sprains, strains, muscle pain, • traumatic muscle spasm, • reflex muscle spasm associated with rheumatic diseases, • lumbago, • myalgia, • tension headache, • torticollis, • cervical root syndrome, • rheumatoid arthritis. This medicinal product offers quick relief of pain and restore mobility even in severely painful spasms of the skeletal muscles in cases as above. Dosage and Administration Route of Administration For oral use. Adults Unless otherwise prescribed by a physician, the dose is 1 to 2 capsules three times daily after meals according to the severity of symptoms. Daily dose should not exceed 4 grams of paracetamol and 3 grams of chlorzoxazone. Do not exceed the stated dose. Minimum dosing interval: 4 hours Children This medicinal product is not recommended for children under 12 years. Elderly There are no relevant data available. Renal impairment Patients who have been diagnosed with renal impairment must seek medical advice before taking this medication (see Section Warnings and Precautions) Page 1 of 8 Hepatic impairment This medicinal product should not be given to patients with impaired liver function (see Section Warnings and Precautions). Contraindications Paracetamol / chlorzoxazone is contraindicated in: • hypersensitivity to the active substances or any of the excipients. Warnings and Precautions Renal impairment Care is advised in the administration of paracetamol/ chlorzoxazone to patients with renal impairment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Evidence of Use and Harms of Novel Benzodiazepines
    ACMD Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Novel Benzodiazepines A review of the evidence of use and harms of Novel Benzodiazepines April 2020 1 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Legal control of benzodiazepines .......................................................................................... 4 3. Benzodiazepine chemistry and pharmacology .................................................................. 6 4. Benzodiazepine misuse............................................................................................................ 7 Benzodiazepine use with opioids ................................................................................................... 9 Social harms of benzodiazepine use .......................................................................................... 10 Suicide ............................................................................................................................................. 11 5. Prevalence and harm summaries of Novel Benzodiazepines ...................................... 11 1. Flualprazolam ......................................................................................................................... 11 2. Norfludiazepam ....................................................................................................................... 13 3. Flunitrazolam ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Review 05/31/2010
    Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Review 05/31/2010 Copyright © 2007 – 2010 by Provider Synergies, L.L.C. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, digital scanning, or via any information storage and retrieval system without the express written consent of Provider Synergies, L.L.C. All requests for permission should be mailed to: Attention: Copyright Administrator Intellectual Property Department Provider Synergies, L.L.C 10101 Alliance Road, Suite 201 Cincinnati, Ohio 45242 The materials contained herein represent the opinions of the collective authors and editors and should not be construed to be the official representation of any professional organization or group, any state Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee, any state Medicaid Agency, or any other clinical committee. This material is not intended to be relied upon as medical advice for specific medical cases and nothing contained herein should be relied upon by any patient, medical professional or layperson seeking information about a specific course of treatment for a specific medical condition. All readers of this material are responsible for independently obtaining medical advice and guidance from their own physician and/or other medical professional in regard to the best course of treatment for their specific medical condition. This publication, inclusive of all forms contained herein, is intended
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Muscle Relaxant Activity of Alprazolam with Diazepam in Mice
    IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 17, Issue 9 Ver. 5 (September. 2018), PP 09-14 www.iosrjournals.org Comparative Study of Muscle Relaxant Activity of Alprazolam With Diazepam In Mice Syed Shadman Ahmad1*, Supriya Priyambadha2 1*Assistant Professor, Dept. of Pharmacology,Rama medical college Hospital and Research center,Kanpur 2 Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Dr.Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Chinaoutpalli, Krishna (Dist), Andhra Pradesh Corresponding author: Syed Shadman Ahmad Abstract: Background: A muscle relaxant is a drug which affects skeletal muscle function and decreases the muscle tone. It may be used to alleviate symptoms such as muscle spasm, pain and hyperreflexia. Skeletal muscle relaxants are heterogeneous group of medications that refer to 2 major therapeutic groups: neuromuscular blockers and spasmolytics. Aim and objectives: The study was designed to assess the muscle relaxant activity of alprazolam and compare the muscle relaxant activity of alprazolam with diazepam using albino male mouse as experimental model Materials and methods: The white albino mice were selected, weighed and numbered. A total of 24 animals weighing about 30 grams were selected for the present study. They were divided into four groups each group consists of 6 mice. The animal was placed one by one on the rotarod more than one mouse at a time were placed. Initially free fall off reading was taken before administration of drugs. The free fall off time was noted when the mouse falls from the rotating rod. A normal untreated mouse generally falls off within 3-5 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonata®(Zaleplon) Capsules CIV
    Sonata®(zaleplon) Capsules CIV DESCRIPTION Zaleplon is a nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic from the pyrazolopyrimidine class. The chemical name of zaleplon is N-[3-(3-cyanopyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-7-yl)phenyl]-N-ethylacetamide. Its empirical formula is C17H15N5O, and its molecular weight is 305.34. The structural formula is shown below. Zaleplon is a white to off-white powder that is practically insoluble in water and sparingly soluble in alcohol or propylene glycol. Its partition coefficient in octanol/water is constant (log PC = 1.23) over the pH range of 1 to 7. Sonata® capsules contain zaleplon as the active ingredient. Inactive ingredients consist of microcrystalline cellulose, pregelatinized starch, silicon dioxide, sodium lauryl sulfate, magnesium stearate, lactose, gelatin, titanium dioxide, D&C yellow #10, FD&C blue #1, FD&C green #3, and FD&C yellow #5. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Pharmacodynamics and Mechanism of Action While Sonata (zaleplon) is a hypnotic agent with a chemical structure unrelated to benzodiazepines, barbiturates, or other drugs with known hypnotic properties, it interacts with the gamma-aminobutyric acid-benzodiazepine (GABA-BZ) receptor complex. Subunit modulation of the GABA-BZ receptor chloride channel macromolecular complex is hypothesized to be Reference ID: 4386603 responsible for some of the pharmacological properties of benzodiazepines, which include sedative, anxiolytic, muscle relaxant, and anticonvulsive effects in animal models. Other nonclinical studies have also shown that zaleplon binds selectively to the brain omega-1 receptor situated on the alpha subunit of the GABAA/chloride ion channel receptor complex and potentiates t-butyl-bicyclophosphorothionate (TBPS) binding. Studies of binding of zaleplon to recombinant GABAA receptors (α1β1γ2 [omega-1] and α2β1γ2 [omega-2]) have shown that zaleplon has a low affinity for these receptors, with preferential binding to the omega-1 receptor.
    [Show full text]
  • FDA Listing of Established Pharmacologic Class Text Phrases January 2021
    FDA Listing of Established Pharmacologic Class Text Phrases January 2021 FDA EPC Text Phrase PLR regulations require that the following statement is included in the Highlights Indications and Usage heading if a drug is a member of an EPC [see 21 CFR 201.57(a)(6)]: “(Drug) is a (FDA EPC Text Phrase) indicated for Active Moiety Name [indication(s)].” For each listed active moiety, the associated FDA EPC text phrase is included in this document. For more information about how FDA determines the EPC Text Phrase, see the 2009 "Determining EPC for Use in the Highlights" guidance and 2013 "Determining EPC for Use in the Highlights" MAPP 7400.13.
    [Show full text]