Sonata®(Zaleplon) Capsules CIV
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pharmaceutical Starting Materials/Essential Drugs
BULLETIN MNS October 2009 PHARMACEUTICAL STARTING MATERIALS MARKET NEWS SERVICE (MNS) BI -MONTHLY EDITION Market News Service Pharmaceutical Starting Materials/Essential Drugs October 2009, Issue 5 The Market News Service (MNS) is made available free of charge to all Trade Support Institutions and enterprises in Sub-Saharan African countries under a joint programme of the International Trade Centre and CBI, the Dutch Centre for the Promotion of Imports from Developing Countries (www.cbi.nl). Should you be interested in becoming an information provider and contributing to MNS' efforts to improve market transparency and facilitate trade, please contact us at [email protected]. This issue continues the series, started at the beginning of the year, focusing on the leading markets in various world regions. This issue covers the trends and recent developments in eastern European pharmaceutical markets. To subscribe to the report or to access MNS reports directly online, please contact [email protected] or visit our website at: http://www.intracen.org/mns. Copyright © MNS/ITC 2007. All rights reserved 1 Market News Service Pharmaceutical Starting Materials Introduction WHAT IS THE MNS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL STARTING MATERIALS/ESSENTIAL DRUGS? In 1986, the World Health Assembly laid before the Organization the responsibility to provide price information on pharmaceutical starting materials. WHA 39.27 endorsed WHO‟s revised drug strategy, which states “... strengthen market intelligence; support drug procurement by developing countries...” The responsibility was reaffirmed at the 49th WHA in 1996. Resolution WHA 49.14 requests the Director General, under paragraph 2(6) “to strengthen market intelligence, review in collaboration with interested parties‟ information on prices and sources of information on prices of essential drugs and starting material of good quality, which meet requirements of internationally recognized pharmacopoeias or equivalent regulatory standards, and provide this information to member states”. -
Once-Daily Skeletal Muscle Relaxant in SA
NEWS Once-daily skeletal muscle relaxant in SA Myprocam (cyclobenzaprine with spine-related disorders and other 8. What are the classes of muscle a protective coating, and a polymer extended release [ER] sports injuries are excellent candidates relaxants? membrane that controls the rate of hydrochloride) is the most widely for Myprocam. Skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs) are drug release. prescribed skeletal muscle a group of structurally unrelated drugs, The formulation of the drug relaxant in the US, is now available 4. What are the common as shown in Figure 1. These are divided ensures early systemic exposure in SA. Myprocam’s safety and efficacy indications for which Myprocam into two categories: to cyclobenzaprine, with a plasma has been shown in more than 20 clinical is used, and what are the common • Antispasticity agents: Used to concentration at four hours that trials. It was recently launched by causes of these ailments? treat muscle spasticity caused by is similar to that observed with Adcock Ingram nationally, making SA Low back pain, neck pain, sports traumatic neurologic injury, multiple cyclobenzaprine IR. the second country (only to the US) to injuries, muscle sprains and strains. sclerosis, and other conditions. However, in contrast to the bring the product to market. Common causes of these conditions • Antispasmodic agents: Used fluctuating peaks and troughs in Myprocam, indicated for the relief of include sports injuries, car accidents, to treat muscular pain or spasm plasma cyclobenzaprine concentration muscle spasm associated with acute work-related injuries, and everyday associated with acute, nonspecific after administration of the IR and painful musculoskeletal conditions, activities, which account for acute musculoskeletal conditions. -
RUNNING HEAD: Anomalous Experiences and Hypnotic Suggestibility
Anomalous experiences and hypnotic suggestibility 1 RUNNING HEAD: Anomalous experiences and hypnotic suggestibility Anomalous experiences are more prevalent among highly suggestible individuals who are also highly dissociative David Acunzo1, Etzel Cardeña2, & Devin B. Terhune3* 1 Centre for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy 2 Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden 3 Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK * Correspondence address: Devin B. Terhune Department of Psychology Goldsmiths, University of London 8 Lewisham Way New Cross, London, UK SE14 6NW [email protected] Word count: 3,186 The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Open Science Framework at osf.io/cfa3r. Anomalous experiences and hypnotic suggestibility 2 Abstract Introduction: Predictive coding models propose that high hypnotic suggestibility confers a predisposition to hallucinate due to an elevated propensity to weight perceptual beliefs (priors) over sensory evidence. Multiple lines of research corroborate this prediction and demonstrate a link between hypnotic suggestibility and proneness to anomalous perceptual states. However, such effects might be moderated by dissociative tendencies, which seem to account for heterogeneity in high hypnotic suggestibility. We tested the prediction that the prevalence of anomalous experiences would be greater among highly suggestible individuals who are also highly dissociative. Methods: We compared high and low dissociative highly suggestible participants and low suggestible controls on multiple psychometric measures of anomalous experiences. Results: High dissociative highly suggestible participants reliably reported greater anomalous experiences than low dissociative highly suggestible participants and low suggestible controls, who did not significantly differ from each other. Conclusions: These results suggest a greater predisposition to experience anomalous perceptual states among high dissociative highly suggestible individuals. -
An FAQ Explaining the Use of Benzodiazepine Sedative Hypnotic Medications in the Elderly
Pharmacy Quality Measures An FAQ Explaining the Use of Benzodiazepine Sedative Hypnotic Medications in the Elderly by Natalie Bari WHERE DOES THIS MEASURE sures feature medications from the the diagnoses (such as insomnia, agi- FIT INTO THE OVERALL MEDI- American Geriatrics Society’s Beers tation, delirium) that the Beers Criteria CARE PART D STAR RATINGS? Criteria for potentially inappropriate state should be avoided. This measure was endorsed by the medication use in older adults. The Pharmacy Quality Alliance (PQA) original HRM measure discussed the WHAT DOES THIS MEASURE in May 2014. But to date, it has not use of non-benzodiazepine sedative ANALYZE? been adopted by the Medicare Part D hypnotics, but it did not include This measure calculates the percent of Star Ratings program. The measure benzodiazepines as they were listed as patients 65 years of age and older who is often described as an extension “avoid only for treatment of insomnia, have received two or more prescription of the PQA measure on the use of agitation or delirium.” The additional fills for any benzodiazepine sedative high-risk medications in the elderly measure was created to address the hypnotic for a cumulative period of (HRM), which was used in the calcu- concern that an unintended conse- more than 90 days. The benzodiaze- lation of the CMS 2015 Star Ratings quence of the HRM measure would be pine sedative hypnotic medications using 2013 claims data. Both mea- increased use of benzodiazepines for are defined to include estazolam, 32 America’s PHARMACIST | January 2015 temazepam, triazolam, flurazepam, them frequently over a prolonged peri- use of the benzodiazepine agents spe- and quazepam. -
Herbal Remedies and Their Possible Effect on the Gabaergic System and Sleep
nutrients Review Herbal Remedies and Their Possible Effect on the GABAergic System and Sleep Oliviero Bruni 1,* , Luigi Ferini-Strambi 2,3, Elena Giacomoni 4 and Paolo Pellegrino 4 1 Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy 2 Department of Neurology, Ospedale San Raffaele Turro, 20127 Milan, Italy; [email protected] 3 Sleep Disorders Center, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy 4 Department of Medical Affairs, Sanofi Consumer HealthCare, 20158 Milan, Italy; Elena.Giacomoni@sanofi.com (E.G.); Paolo.Pellegrino@sanofi.com (P.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-33-5607-8964; Fax: +39-06-3377-5941 Abstract: Sleep is an essential component of physical and emotional well-being, and lack, or dis- ruption, of sleep due to insomnia is a highly prevalent problem. The interest in complementary and alternative medicines for treating or preventing insomnia has increased recently. Centuries-old herbal treatments, popular for their safety and effectiveness, include valerian, passionflower, lemon balm, lavender, and Californian poppy. These herbal medicines have been shown to reduce sleep latency and increase subjective and objective measures of sleep quality. Research into their molecular components revealed that their sedative and sleep-promoting properties rely on interactions with various neurotransmitter systems in the brain. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is an inhibitory neurotransmitter that plays a major role in controlling different vigilance states. GABA receptors are the targets of many pharmacological treatments for insomnia, such as benzodiazepines. Here, we perform a systematic analysis of studies assessing the mechanisms of action of various herbal medicines on different subtypes of GABA receptors in the context of sleep control. -
The Safety Risk Associated with Z-Medications to Treat Insomnia in Substance Use Disorder Patients
Riaz U, et al., J Addict Addictv Disord 2020, 7: 054 DOI: 10.24966/AAD-7276/100054 HSOA Journal of Addiction & Addictive Disorders Review Article Introduction The Safety Risk Associated Benzodiazepine receptor agonist is divided in two categories: with Z-Medications to Treat a) Benzodiazepine hypnotics and Insomnia in Substance Use b) Non-benzodiazepine hypnotics. The prescription of Z-medications which is non-benzodiazepine Disorder Patients hypnotic is common in daily clinical practice, particularly among primary medical providers to treat patients with insomnia. This trend Usman Riaz, MD1* and Syed Ali Riaz, MD2 is less observed among psychiatrist, but does exist. While treating substance use disorder population the prescription of Z-medications 1 Division of Substance Abuse, Department of Psychiatry, Montefiore Medical should be strongly discouraged secondary to well documented Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx NY, USA safety risks. There is sufficient data available suggesting against the 2Department of Pulmonology/Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Virtua Health, prescription of Z-medications to treat insomnia in substance abuse New Jersey, USA patients. Though treating insomnia is essential in substance use disorder patients to prevent relapse on alcohol/drugs, be mindful of risk associated with hypnotics particularly with BZRA (Benzodiazepines Abstract and Non benzodiazepines hypnotics). Z-medications are commonly prescribed in clinical practices Classification of Z-medications despite the safety concerns. Although these medications are Name of medication Half-life (hr) Adult dose (mg). considered safer than benzodiazepines, both act on GABA-A receptors as an allosteric modulator. In clinical practice, the risk Zaleplon 1 5-20 profile for both medications is not any different, particularly in Zolpidem 1.5-4.5 5-10 substance use disorder population. -
Drug Class Review on Newer Sedative Hypnotics
Drug Class Review on Newer Sedative Hypnotics Final Report December 2005 The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has not yet seen or approved this report The purpose of this report is to make available information regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of different drugs within pharmaceutical classes. Reports are not usage guidelines, nor should they be read as an endorsement of, or recommendation for, any particular drug, use or approach. Oregon Health & Science University does not recommend or endorse any guideline or recommendation developed by users of these reports. Susan Carson, MPH Po-Yin Yen, MS Marian S. McDonagh, PharmD Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center Oregon Health & Science University Mark Helfand, MD, MPH, Director Copyright © 2005 by Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon 97201. All rights reserved. Final Report Drug Effectiveness Review Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction....................................................................................................................... 4 Scope and Key Questions ............................................................................................. 4 Methods.............................................................................................................................. 6 Literature Search........................................................................................................... 6 Study Selection ............................................................................................................ -
Medications in Long-Term Care: When Less Is More
Medications in Long-Term Care: When Less is More a, b,c Thomas W. Meeks, MD *, John W. Culberson, MD , d,e Monica S. Horton, MD, MSc KEYWORDS Long-term care Inappropriate prescribing Polypharmacy Psychotropics Opiates Sedatives HISTORY OF MEDICATION REDUCTION IN LONG-TERM CARE The Nursing Home Reform Act (OBRA-87) enacted in 1987 called for sweeping changes in the standards of care in nursing homes in accordance with new, more demanding federal regulations. For example, OBRA-87 called for a new approach to the use of antipsychotics in persons with dementia. Because antipsychotics were regarded as frequently inappropriate chemical restraints in long-term care (LTC), OBRA-87 mandated dose reductions in antipsychotics in an effort to discontinue them whenever possible. OBRA-87 proposed that a safer, more supportive environ- ment in LTC settings would facilitate such reductions in antipsychotic doses.1 Overall rates of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults have ranged from 12% to 40%, depending on the setting, criteria, and population sampled.2 Devel- oping from burgeoning concerns for polypharmacy and potential iatrogenic toxicity of medication in older adults, expert consensus lists of potentially inappropriate pharma- cotherapy in the elderly (PIPE) began to emerge. In general, drugs with activity in the central nervous system (CNS) were commonly placed on these PIPE lists, and hence our focus on such medications in this review. This work was supported by the following Geriatric Academic Career Awards: (1) K01 HP00047-02 (Dr. Meeks) (2) K01 HP00080-02 (Dr. Culberson) (3) K01 HP00114-02 (Dr. Horton). The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. -
Drug Class Review on Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
Drug Class Review on Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Final Report Update 2 May 2005 Original Report Date: April 2003 Update 1 Report Date: January 2004 A literature scan of this topic is done periodically The purpose of this report is to make available information regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of different drugs within pharmaceutical classes. Reports are not usage guidelines, nor should they be read as an endorsement of, or recommendation for, any particular drug, use or approach. Oregon Health & Science University does not recommend or endorse any guideline or recommendation developed by users of these reports. Roger Chou, MD Kim Peterson, MS Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center Oregon Health & Science University Mark Helfand, MD, MPH, Director Copyright © 2005 by Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon 97201. All rights reserved. Note: A scan of the medical literature relating to the topic is done periodically (see http://www.ohsu.edu/ohsuedu/research/policycenter/DERP/about/methods.cfm for scanning process description). Upon review of the last scan, the Drug Effectiveness Review Project governance group elected not to proceed with another full update of this report. Some portions of the report may not be up to date. Prior versions of this report can be accessed at the DERP website. Final Report Update 2 Drug Effectiveness Review Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................................................................................................................4 Scope and -
Appendix D: Important Facts About Alcohol and Drugs
APPENDICES APPENDIX D. IMPORTANT FACTS ABOUT ALCOHOL AND DRUGS Appendix D outlines important facts about the following substances: $ Alcohol $ Cocaine $ GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyric acid) $ Heroin $ Inhalants $ Ketamine $ LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide) $ Marijuana (Cannabis) $ MDMA (Ecstasy) $ Mescaline (Peyote) $ Methamphetamine $ Over-the-counter Cough/Cold Medicines (Dextromethorphan or DXM) $ PCP (Phencyclidine) $ Prescription Opioids $ Prescription Sedatives (Tranquilizers, Depressants) $ Prescription Stimulants $ Psilocybin $ Rohypnol® (Flunitrazepam) $ Salvia $ Steroids (Anabolic) $ Synthetic Cannabinoids (“K2”/”Spice”) $ Synthetic Cathinones (“Bath Salts”) PAGE | 53 Sources cited in this Appendix are: $ Drug Enforcement Administration’s Drug Facts Sheets1 $ Inhalant Addiction Treatment’s Dangers of Mixing Inhalants with Alcohol and Other Drugs2 $ National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism’s (NIAAA’s) Alcohol’s Effects on the Body3 $ National Institute on Drug Abuse’s (NIDA’s) Commonly Abused Drugs4 $ NIDA’s Treatment for Alcohol Problems: Finding and Getting Help5 $ National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Library of Medicine’s Alcohol Withdrawal6 $ Rohypnol® Abuse Treatment FAQs7 $ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA’s) Keeping Youth Drug Free8 $ SAMHSA’s Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality’s (CBHSQ’s) Results from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Detailed Tables9 The substances that are considered controlled substances under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) are divided into five schedules. An updated and complete list of the schedules is published annually in Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) §§ 1308.11 through 1308.15.10 Substances are placed in their respective schedules based on whether they have a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, their relative abuse potential, and likelihood of causing dependence when abused. -
CYCLOBENZAPRINE (Brand Name: Flexeril®, Amrix®)
Drug Enforcement Administration Diversion Control Division Drug & Chemical Evaluation Section CYCLOBENZAPRINE ® ® (Brand Name: Flexeril , Amrix ) March 2020 Introduction: Illicit Uses: Cyclobenzaprine is a central nervous system Anecdotal reports found on the Internet suggest (CNS) muscle relaxant intended for short-term use that individuals are taking cyclobenzaprine alone or in the treatment of pain, tenderness and limitation of in combination with other illicit drugs to produce or motion caused by muscle spasms. Cyclobenzaprine enhance psychoactive effects. Individuals have may enhance the effects of other CNS depressants reported taking cyclobenzadrine both orally and including alcohol, barbiturates, benzodiazepines intra-nasally at doses ranging from 10 mg to 60 mg. and narcotics and anecdotal reports indicate it is Sedation, relaxation and increased heart rate were used non-medically to induce euphoria and the most common effects reported. Euphoria was relaxation. reported by a smaller number of individuals. Licit Uses: Illicit Distribution: Cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride is approved for Several indicators suggest that cyclobenzaprine use in the United States as a muscle relaxant. It is is being intentionally misused or abused. According marketed under the brand names Flexeril® and to the American Association of Poison Control Amrix® and as generic formulations in 5, 7.5, and 10 Centers, 10,615 case mentions and 4,444 single mg tablets intended for short-term (2 to 3 week) oral exposures were associated with cyclobenzaprine in administration. The usual starting dose is 5 mg, 2016, resulting in 75 major medical outcomes and three times per day. The maximum recommended four deaths among single substance exposures. In dose is 10 mg, three times daily. -
Public Law 106-172 106Th Congress An
PUBLIC LAW 106-172—FEB. 18, 2000 114 STAT. 7 Public Law 106-172 106th Congress An Act To amend the Controlled Substances Act to direct the^ emergency scheduling of gamma hydroxybutyric acid, to provide for a national awareness campaign, and Feb. 18, 2000 for other piu"poses. [H.R. 2130] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assewMed, Hillory J. Farias and Samantha SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. Reid Date-Rape Drug Prohibition This Act may be cited as the "Hillory J. IFarias and Samantha Act of 2000. Reid Date-Rape Drug Prohibition Act of 2000". Law enforcement and crimes. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 21 use 801 note. Congress finds as follows: 21 use 812 note. (1) Gamma hydroxybutyric acid (also called G, Liquid X, Liquid Ecstasy, Grievous Bodily Harm, Georgia Home Boy, Scoop) has become a significant and growing problem in law enforcement. At least 20 States have sclieduled such drug in their drug laws and law enforcement officials have been experi encing an increased presence of the dinig in driving under the influence, sexual assault, and overdose cases especially at night clubs and parties. (2) A behavioral depressant and a hypnotic, gamma hydroxybutyric acid ("GHB") is being used in conjunction with alcohol and other drugs with detrimental effects in an increasing number of cases. It is difficult to isolate the impact of such drug's ingestion since it is so typically taken with an ever-changing array of other drugs £md especially alcohol which potentiates its impact. (3) GHB takes the same path as alcohol, processes via alcohol dehydrogenase, and its symptoms at high levels of intake and as impact builds are comparable to alcohol inges- i- tion/intoxication.