From Joseph Bensman

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Joseph Bensman From Joseph Bensman On the cover: Portrait of Joseph Bensman by Lydia Csato Gasman, reproduced with the permission of Marilyn Bensman, in association with the art gallery Les Yeux du Monde and the Lydia Csato Gasman Archives, both in Charlottesville, Virginia. Photograph by Lindsay Ann Nolin. The artist’s inscription reads: “With gratitude. I’ll always remember you Joe. Lydia Csato Gasman. 1976.” From Joseph Bensman Essays on Modern Society Edited and introduced by Robert Jackall and Duffy rahamG Newfound Press THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE LIBRARIES, KNOXVILLE From Joseph Bensman: Essays on Modern Society © 2014 by Robert Jackall and Duffy Graham Digital version at newfoundpress.utk.edu/pubs/bensman Newfound Press University of Tennessee Libraries 1015 Volunteer Boulevard Knoxville, TN 37996-1000 newfoundpress.utk.edu ISBN-13: 978-0-9846445-9-9 ISBN-10: 0-9846445-9-8 Bensman, Joseph. From Joseph Bensman : essays on modern society / edited and introduced by Robert Jackall and Duffy Graham. Knoxville, Tennessee : Newfound Press, University of Tennessee Libraries, ©2014. 1 online resource (vi, 696 pages) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Bensman, Joseph -- Political and social views. 2. Sociologists -- United States – History – 20th century -- Biography. 3. Sociology. I. Jackall, Robert. II. Graham, Duffy. III. Title. HM585 .B465 2014 Book design by Jayne W. Smith Cover design by C. S. Jenkins Contents Acknowledgments vii Creator and Disturber 1 Robert Jackall and Duffy Graham Autobiographical Essay: The Sociologist on the Cutting Edge 17 Joseph Bensman PART I. Bureaucracy 1. The Meaning of Work in Bureaucratic Society 41 Joseph Bensman with Bernard Rosenberg 2. Power Cliques in Bureaucratic Society 67 Joseph Bensman with Arthur J. Vidich 3. Bureaucratic and Planning Attitudes 79 Joseph Bensman with Robert Lilienfeld PART II. Crime and Morality 4. Crime and Punishment in the Factory 111 Joseph Bensman with Israel Gerver 5. Official and White-Collar Crime in the United States and the Soviet Union 135 Joseph Bensman 6. The Advertising Man and His Work 145 Joseph Bensman 7. Ethics and Social Structure 213 Joseph Bensman vi CONTENTS PART III. Leadership and Legitimacy 8. The Crisis of Confidence in Modern Politics 243 Joseph Bensman 9. Charisma and Modernity 271 Joseph Bensman with Michael Givant 10. Max Weber’s Concept of Legitimacy 325 Joseph Bensman PART IV. Expertise 11. Toward a Sociology of Expertness 375 Joseph Bensman with Israel Gerver 12. The Springdale Case 401 Joseph Bensman with Arthur J. Vidich 13. Who Writes What in the Bureaucratic University? 459 Joseph Bensman 14. The Aesthetics and Politics of Footnoting 469 Joseph Bensman PART V. Culture and Community 15. Changing Institutions and Ideologies 507 Joseph Bensman with Bernard Rosenberg 16. Art and the Mass Society 551 Joseph Bensman with Israel Gerver 17. The Cultural Contradictions of Daniel Bell 565 Joseph Bensman with Arthur J. Vidich 18. A Theory of the Contemporary American Community 583 Joseph Bensman with Arthur J. Vidich 19. Freedom, Bureaucracy, and Styles for Dissent 619 Joseph Bensman with Arthur J. Vidich Note on the Editors 637 Index 639 Acknowledgments The editors wish to thank Marilyn Bensman, David Bensman, Miriam Bensman, Rhea Bensman, and the Willmott Family Pro- fessorship at Williams College for supporting this project. Special thanks also to Peggy Weyers of Williams College and Jayne Smith of Newfound Press for outstanding technical assistance. Creator and Disturber Robert Jackall and Duffy Graham In “Crime and Punishment in the Factory,”1 Joseph Bensman and Israel Gerver analyze the use of a simple tool, the tap, in the wing- assembly unit of a military airplane manufacturing plant in 1953-54. The authors bring to life complex and contradictory social behavior across the factory floor and up the hierarchy of corporate manage- ment. In doing so, they elucidate the moral rules-in-use typical in bureaucracy, the central institution of our epoch. The essay introduces the tap with a straightforward description. “The tap is a tool, an extremely hard screw, whose threads are slotted to allow for the disposal of the waste metal that it cuts away. It is sufficiently hard so that when it is inserted into a nut it can cut new threads over the original threads of the nut.” Plainly, by design, the tap is a destructive tool. But if recognizing the tool’s inherent subversiveness raises the reader’s eyebrows, then understanding its role in wing assembly triggers an alarm. Large-scale mass production of complex machines presents special challenges and, inevitably, is perfect only on paper. There is, for example, the problem of alignment of parts. “In wing- assembly work, bolts or screws must be inserted in recessed nuts, which are anchored to the wing in earlier processes of assembly. Copyright © 2014 by Robert Jackall and Duffy Graham. 2 FROM JOSEPH BENSMAN The bolt or screw must pass through a wing plate before reaching the nut.” These alignments between nuts and plate-openings can be off. Solutions to the problem of failed alignment include returning the wing plates to an earlier stage in the manufacturing process for adjustment or even returning to the drawing board for an entirely new design. Another solution lies in the tap. “When the nut is not aligned with the hole, the tap can be used to cut, at a new angle, new threads in the nut for the purpose of bringing the nut and bolt into a new but not true alignment. If the tap is not used and the bolt is forced, the wing plate itself may be bent.” The solution achieved by the tap, however, deviates from design specifications. “On the basis of engineering standards true alignments are necessary at every stage in order to achieve maximum strength and a proper equi- librium of strains and stresses.” The use of the tap, in other words, overrides design to achieve a tenuous, superficial, and dangerous solution. It compromises the structural integrity of the aircraft. It conceals defects. It also creates maintenance problems for another day. Moreover, it is grounds for termination of employment for indi- vidual workers and of business relationships for the company. It is, in short, a threat to the entire enterprise. The authors are explicit: “The use of the tap is the most serious crime of workmanship conceivable in the plant.” Officially, with obvious good reason, the tap is contraband, its use forbidden, its mere possession grounds for dismissal. Yet, the authors observe, wing-assembly workers widely, even routinely, use the tap. At least half of the workers in a position to use a tap have at least one in their toolbox. The intellectual problem that arises from this paradox is, why and how does this airplane factory accommodate the use of the tap? Or, more generally, why and how does an organization accommodate criminal conduct? CREATOR AND DISTURBER 3 The answer, Bensman and Gerver explain, is that production demands use of the tap and compels individuals and occupational groups within the factory to strike bargains amongst themselves to set the terms of its use. Factory work is classically segmented and layered, broken into parts vertically and horizontally. One part has no control over, and indeed little knowledge of, another. Each part focuses on its own task, not on the whole. At the apex, the factory’s obligation to the military is to produce a certain number of airplanes at a certain rate according to certain specifications. At the bottom, individual workers have discrete, routine tasks. In between, for office managers, for plant managers, and not least for foremen on the plant floor directly in charge of groups of assembly-line workers, the obli- gation comes down to ensuring that fixed amounts of work get done in fixed amounts of time at predetermined costs, so that the product can come together in a timely way, each unit ready to forward fin- ished work and to receive incoming work on schedule. This obligation takes the form of workload requirements, monitored by production charts. Failure to meet unblinkingly the constant demand of the pro- duction chart jeopardizes the factory’s commitments to the military, the ability of other departments or units to meet their obligations on time, the standing of one’s bosses, and one’s own employment. This pressure is felt at every level in the factory and the business office. Accordingly, failed alignment poses a serious, material problem. To cope, experienced workers apprentice new workers in the use of the tap and, crucially, accompanying etiquette; foremen authorize work- ers to use the tap in coded, often nonverbal language; inspectors and workers choreograph their interactions to avoid confronting the problem—all while strictly maintaining the official, public condem- nation of the tap. Breaches of these agreements are opportunities, never wasted, to censure publicly the use of the tap while covertly reestablishing the terms of the agreements. For the individual, these 4 FROM JOSEPH BENSMAN bargains constitute an ad hoc reconciliation of competing and con- tradictory demands: the tap is forbidden, but the tap is required; one must “get the work out” but also respect the rules of craftsmanship; one fosters collegial relationships, not least because of the protection they provide, or one insists on proper but inevitably contentious rela- tionships with the risks these carry. Thus, one engages in behavior that is officially criminal because it is essential to satisfy bureaucratic imperatives. Those affected accom- modate this moral ambiguity through a series of specialized social transactions. These transactions are complex, provisional, subject at all times to renegotiation, and feature public and private dimensions involving “coercion, sanctions, genuine cooperation, and altruism,” as well as ritual, ceremony, and the invocation of situational moral rules-in-use. So understood, use of the tap is not an act of rebel- lion, not a departure from norms, not “unethical”—and certainly not a crime.
Recommended publications
  • The Growth of Criminological Theories
    THE GROWTH OF CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES Jonathon M. Heidt B.A., University of Montana, 2000 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the School of Criminology OJonathon M. Heidt 2003 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY November 2003 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Jonathon Heidt Degree: M.A. Title of Thesis: The Growth of Criminological Theories Examining Committee: Chair: ~ridnkurtch,P~JJ$ . D;. Robert ~ordoi,kh.~. Senior Supervisor Dr. Elizabeth Elliott, Ph.D. Member Sociology Department University at Albany - SUNY Date Approved: PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Project/Extended Essay The Growth of Criminological Theories Author: Name ABSTRACT In the last 50 years, an extensive array of theories has appeared within the field of criminology, many generated by the discipline of sociology.
    [Show full text]
  • Television Academy Awards
    2021 Primetime Emmy® Awards Ballot Outstanding Music Composition For A Series (Original Dramatic Score) The Alienist: Angel Of Darkness Belly Of The Beast After the horrific murder of a Lying-In Hospital employee, the team are now hot on the heels of the murderer. Sara enlists the help of Joanna to tail their prime suspect. Sara, Kreizler and Moore try and put the pieces together. Bobby Krlic, Composer All Creatures Great And Small (MASTERPIECE) Episode 1 James Herriot interviews for a job with harried Yorkshire veterinarian Siegfried Farnon. His first day is full of surprises. Alexandra Harwood, Composer American Dad! 300 It’s the 300th episode of American Dad! The Smiths reminisce about the funniest thing that has ever happened to them in order to complete the application for a TV gameshow. Walter Murphy, Composer American Dad! The Last Ride Of The Dodge City Rambler The Smiths take the Dodge City Rambler train to visit Francine’s Aunt Karen in Dodge City, Kansas. Joel McNeely, Composer American Gods Conscience Of The King Despite his past following him to Lakeside, Shadow makes himself at home and builds relationships with the town’s residents. Laura and Salim continue to hunt for Wednesday, who attempts one final gambit to win over Demeter. Andrew Lockington, Composer Archer Best Friends Archer is head over heels for his new valet, Aleister. Will Archer do Aleister’s recommended rehabilitation exercises or just eat himself to death? JG Thirwell, Composer Away Go As the mission launches, Emma finds her mettle as commander tested by an onboard accident, a divided crew and a family emergency back on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago School (Sociology)
    Chicago school (sociology) In sociology and later criminology, the Chicago school (sometimes described as the ecological school) was the first major body of works emerging during the 1920s and 1930s specializing in urban sociology, and the research into the urban environment by combining theory and ethnographic fieldwork in Chicago, now applied elsewhere. While involving scholars at several Chicago area universities, the term is often used interchangeably to refer to the University of Chicago's sociology department. Following the Second World War, a "second Chicago school" arose whose members used symbolic interactionism combined with methods of field research (today often referred to asethnography ), to create a new body of work.[1] The major researchers in the first Chicago school included Nels Anderson, Ernest Burgess, Ruth Shonle Cavan, Edward Franklin Frazier, Everett Hughes, Roderick D. McKenzie, George Herbert Mead, Robert E. Park, Walter C. Reckless, Edwin Sutherland, W. I. Thomas [1], Frederic Thrasher, Louis Wirth, and Florian Znaniecki. The activist, social scientist, and Nobel Peace Prize winner Jane Addams also forged and maintained close ties with some of the members of the Chicago school of sociology. Contents Discussion Ecology and social theories Conclusions References References Other references Discussion The Chicago school is best known for its urban sociology and for the development of the symbolic interactionist approach, notably through the work of Herbert Blumer. It has focused on human behavior as shaped by social structures and physical environmental factors, rather than genetic and personal characteristics. Biologists and anthropologists had accepted the theory of evolution as demonstrating that animals adapt to their environments.
    [Show full text]
  • City May Rethink Banners
    Cause for house Hikes offered by Tigers, Knights explosion found Limberlost naturalist pick up big wins Area State Entertainment Guide Page 3 Sports Page 6 Good Morning! The News-Bannerwww.News-Banner.com SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2020 BLUFFTON, INDIANA • Wells County’s Hometown Connection $1.00 City may rethink banners By DAVE SCHULTZ his office. “I’m concerned about safety for Mayor John Whicker would really like the workers.” to get Bluffton out of the Main Street ban- Whicker has brought up the matter to ner business — particularly at the busiest the Board of Public Works and Safety, intersection in town. where he has one of the three votes. He Crews from Bluffton Utilities’ Electric wanted to give his two fellow Board of Department have hung banners promot- Works members, Scott Mentzer and Roger ing various community activities — most Thornton, some time to think about it. recently, the Kehoe Summer Concert Mentzer was not present last Tuesday Series — across Main Street/Ind. 1. The and Thornton will not be present this com- banners are put up just north of Wabash ing Tuesday, so any kind of a decision will Street, which is one of the busiest intersec- be delayed until at least Sept. 22. tions in town — if not the busiest. There have been proposals to placing The way it’s done is that the lift truck the banner elsewhere, perhaps a little fur- is parked in the middle of Main Street. A ther south on Main Street to get away from worker goes up in a basket and attaches the downtown traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Bibliography on the History of American Sociology
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2005 Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology Michael R. Hill [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology" (2005). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 348. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/348 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R., (Compiler). 2005. Centennial Bibliography of the History of American Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. CENTENNIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN SOCIOLOGY Compiled by MICHAEL R. HILL Editor, Sociological Origins In consultation with the Centennial Bibliography Committee of the American Sociological Association Section on the History of Sociology: Brian P. Conway, Michael R. Hill (co-chair), Susan Hoecker-Drysdale (ex-officio), Jack Nusan Porter (co-chair), Pamela A. Roby, Kathleen Slobin, and Roberta Spalter-Roth. © 2005 American Sociological Association Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: Each part is separately paginated, with the number of pages in each part as indicated below in square brackets. The total page count for the entire file is 224 pages. To navigate within the document, please use navigation arrows and the Bookmark feature provided by Adobe Acrobat Reader.® Users may search this document by utilizing the “Find” command (typically located under the “Edit” tab on the Adobe Acrobat toolbar).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Eight: Deviance and Social Control
    Chapter Eight: Deviance and Social Control Chapter Summary Sociologists use the term deviance to refer to any violation of rules and norms. From a sociological perspective, deviance is relative. Definitions of “what is deviant” vary across societies and from one group to another within the same society. Howard S. Becker described the interpretation of deviance as, “…not the act itself, but the reaction to the act that makes something deviant.” This coincides with the symbolic interactionist view. In some cases, an individual need not do anything to be labeled a deviant. He or she may be falsely accused or discredited because of a birth defect, race, or disease. Even crime is relative when interpreting the deviance of the actor. Deviance is based on adherence to and violation of norms. Human groups need norms to exist. By making behavior predictable, norms make social life possible. Consequently, all human groups develop a system of social control, which involves formal and informal means of enforcing norms. Those who violate these norms face the danger of being labeled “deviant.” Violators can expect to experience negative sanctions for the violation of norms. Members of society who conform to societal norms, especially those who go above and beyond what is commonly expected, receive positive sanctions. In some societies, such as the Amish, shaming is a common negative sanction that acts strongly as a means of social control, minimizing deviance. Biologists, psychologists, and sociologists have different perspectives on why people violate norms. Biological explanations focus on genetic predispositions, psychologists concentrate on abnormalities within the individual (commonly known as personality disorders), and sociologists look at social factors outside the individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology 4111 (Uggen): Deviant Behavior Midterm Review, Spring 2004
    Sociology 4111 (Uggen): Deviant Behavior Midterm Review, Spring 2004 PART I: BASIC CONCEPTS -- DEVIANCE, CONTROL, AND CAREERS I. Social Facts and Social Constructions II. Defining Deviance a. Clinard’s Definitions of Deviance (Statistical, Absolutist, Reactivist, Normative) b. Adlers’ definition’s i. Deviance as violation of social norms (Attitudes, Behaviors, Conditions, Prescriptive norms, Proscriptive norms) ii. Role iii. Subcultures iv. Power v. Moral entrepreneurs c. Kai Erikson (1966) III. Differences between Criminology and Deviance a. Piece in The Criminologist: b. Heckert: positive deviance i. Altruism (hero) ii. Charisma (dictator) iii. Innovation (artist) iv. Supra-Conformity (4.0) v. Innate/Ascribed (beauty) vi. Ex-Deviant (saved) c. Middle Class norms - Typology of Deviance IV. Social Controls and the Hobbesian Problem of Order a. Thomas Hobbes i. “Hobbesian problem of order” ii. How can we create a society in which self-interested people don’t use force and fraud to satisfy their (criminal, sexual, substance-abusing …) wants? iii. 3 “solutions” to Hobbesian dilemma 1. Normative 2. Exchange 3. Conflict iv. Informal social controls v. Formal social controls b. social controls and constructions i. Clinard: Deviant Events in Context ii. Joel Best: Social Constructionism c. Race and formal control i. Anderson on police as social control ii. Local perspective/Why focus on police? V. Introduction to Deviant Careers (of people, firms, nations…) a. Becoming Deviant b. Phases of the Deviant Career 1 VI. Subcultures, Power, and “Unconventional Sentimentality” (5 min. video: The Wall) a. Chambliss: Saints and Roughnecks b. Sanchez Jankowski: Joining a Gang c. Fox: Real Punks and Pretenders PART II: THEORIES OF DEVIANCE AND SOCIETAL REACTION VII.
    [Show full text]
  • Employee Theft: a Study of the Major Sociological, Economic
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF IRENE ELAINE VOIT for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN INTER- DISCIPLINARY STUDIES in BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, ECONOMICS, AND SOCIOLOGY presented on MAY 1, 1978 Title: EMPLOYEE THEFT: A STUDY OF THE MAJOR SOCIOLOGICAL, ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS CAUSAL THEORIES Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: DR. MATT M. AMANO Although employee theft is claimed by many authors to be a significant problem in America with corrosive and damaging effects upon business and society, very little research has been done to establish the causes of such behavior. The purpose of this thesis was to identify, discuss, and critically evaluate theories that might have the potential to explain the etiology of employee theft. To discover the most promising theories necessitated searching the literature of several disciplines, including criminology/sociology, business, and economics. A surprisingly small amount of literature that could be considered of a serious or research nature that was concerned specifically with employee theft could be uncovered. It became necessary to broaden the search to include major theories on the etiology of crime in general and to determine their applicability and value in the study of employee theft. Differential association theory, alienation theory, labeling theory, and cost/benefit analysis were identified as having potential value despite their cited shortcomings. The final chapter compared the approaches of the theories, discussed how current research methodology is deficient, and suggested areas for future
    [Show full text]
  • The Ladies Vanish? American Sociology and the Genealogy of Its Missing Women on Wikipedia Wei Luo, Julia Adams and Hannah Brueck
    The Ladies Vanish? American Sociology and the Genealogy of its Missing Women on Wikipedia Wei Luo, Julia Adams and Hannah Brueckner Working Paper # 0012 January 2018 Division of Social Science Working Paper Series New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island P.O Box 129188, Abu Dhabi, UAE https://nyuad.nyu.edu/en/academics/divisions/social-science.html 1 The Ladies Vanish? American Sociology and the Genealogy of its Missing Women on Wikipedia Wei Luo Yale University [email protected] Julia Adams Yale University [email protected] Hannah Brueckner NYU-Abu Dhabi [email protected] Acknowledgements The authors gratefully acknowledge support for this research from the National Science Foundation (grant #1322971), research assistance from Yasmin Kakar, and comments from Scott Boorman, anonymous reviewers, participants in the Comparative Research Workshop at Yale Sociology, as well as from panelists and audience members at the Social Science History Association. 2 The Ladies Vanish? American Sociology and the Genealogy of its Missing Women on Wikipedia Wei Luo, Julia Adams and Hannah Brueckner “People just don't vanish and so forth.” “But she has.” “What?” “Vanished.” “Who?” “The old dame.” … “But how could she?” “What?” “Vanish.” “I don't know.” “That just explains my point. People just don't disappear into thin air.” --- Alfred Hitchcock, The Lady Vanishes (1938)1 INTRODUCTION In comparison to many academic disciplines, sociology has been relatively open to women since its founding, and seems increasingly so. Yet many notable female sociologists are missing from the public history of American sociology, both print and digital. The rise of crowd- sourced digital sources, particularly the largest and most influential, Wikipedia, seems to promise a new and more welcoming approach.
    [Show full text]
  • White-Collar Crime; and for This Lesson, Please Read: » Rosoff, Pontell and Tillman, White- » Understand How Researchers and Others Have Used the Term
    OC0899020-White Collar Crime » Define the term white-collar crime; and For this lesson, please read: » Rosoff, Pontell and Tillman, White- » Understand how researchers and others have used the term. collar Crime: Chapter 1. Introduction » Pontell and Shichor, Contemporary Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice: Meier, “Geis, Sutherland and White-collar Crime.” OC0899020-l1t1p1.html[4/9/2018 3:17:14 PM] This course is designed to familiarize you with what is commonly referred to as white-collar crime. } As you will soon learn, this topic is seen and considered in various ways by the public, scholars, the legal profession, and those who work in the criminal justice system. We will consider a number of areas of interest, including definitional issues, the origins and usefulness of the term white-collar crime, victimization issues, costs to society, forms of white-collar crime, etiological concerns, and social control issues related to prevention, enforcement, sanctioning, and social control. This lesson will explore many types of economic crimes and frauds. We'll pay particular attention to two of the most costly sets of white-collar crimes in history: the savings and loan debacle of the 1980s and the more recent corporate and accounting scandals of 2002, which led to the meltdown of worldwide financial markets and trillions of dollars in losses. » After your successful completion of this course, you will have an excellent fundamental background in the area of white-collar crime. You will also understand why this topic is important in the study of crime, as well as how it relates to society more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • CRIMINOLOGY Spring 2011 Monday 6-8:30 Mondays, Rm 1114 Social Science
    SOCIOLOGY 8111 – CRIMINOLOGY Spring 2011 Monday 6-8:30 Mondays, Rm 1114 Social Science Christopher Uggen (pronounced You-Gun) 1167 Social Sciences: 624-4016 Office: by appointment; Email: [email protected]; Course page: www.soc.umn.edu/~uggen/8111.htm Criminology is the body of knowledge regarding delinquency and crime as social phenomena. It includes within its scope the process of making laws, breaking laws, and of reacting toward the breaking of laws. These processes are three aspects of a somewhat unified sequence of interactions. The objective of criminology is the development of a body of general and verified principles and of other types of knowledge regarding this process of law, crime, and reaction to crime. – Edwin Sutherland DESCRIPTION This seminar offers a graduate-level foundation of theory and new empirical research in sociological criminology. I follow Edwin Sutherland’s broad definition of the field, though this course emphasizes rulebreaking (see seminars in the sociology of law and sociology of punishment for more on rulemaking and societal reaction). Our focus is definitive statements from important theoretical traditions and critical empirical tests of these theories. We also address critiques of the theories or the research generated by them and attempts to translate theories into policy. OBJECTIVES 1. The course will help you develop a more nuanced understanding of the dominant theoretical traditions in criminology. This knowledge is absolutely fundamental to teaching criminology at the college level and to developing graduate reading lists and publishing research in the area. 2. We will work through empirical pieces by many of the best sociological criminologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing Crime and Punishment Through a Sociological Lens: Contributions, Practices, and the Future
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2005 Seeing Crime and Punishment through a Sociological Lens: Contributions, Practices, and the Future Bernard E. Harcourt Tracey L. Meares John Hagan Calvin Morrill Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Bernard E. Harcourt, Tracey L. Meares, John Hagan & Calvin Morrill, "Seeing Crime and Punishment through a Sociological Lens: Contributions, Practices, and the Future," 2005 University of Chicago Legal Forum 289 (2005). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Seeing Crime and Punishment Through a Sociological Lens: Contributions, Practices, and the Futue A Conversation with Calvin Morill, John Hagantt BernardE. Harcourtttt and Tracey Mearettt t* There is a rich intellectual history to the sociological study of crime and punishment that encompasses multiple and inter- related traditions.' Some of these traditions trace their roots to the European social theorists of the nineteenth century, particu- larly Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Karl Marx. Although only Durkheim and Weber systematically studied law (and only Durkheim actually studied punishment), all three social theo- rists facilitated the development of sociological research and the- ory on crime and punishment. Durkheim's Suicide: A Study in Sociology 2 for example, investigated the relationship between t Calvin Morrill is Professor and Chair of Sociology at the University of California at Irvine, and is Professor of Criminology, Law, and Society at the School of Social Ecology and Professor of Business at the Merage School of Business at the University of Califor- nia at Irvine.
    [Show full text]