DOCSLIB.ORG

Seeing Crime and Punishment Through a Sociological Lens: Contributions, Practices, and the Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seeing Crime and Punishment Through a Sociological Lens: Contributions, Practices, and the Future University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2005 Seeing Crime and Punishment through a Sociological Lens: Contributions, Practices, and the Future Bernard E. Harcourt Tracey L. Meares John Hagan Calvin Morrill Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Bernard E. Harcourt, Tracey L. Meares, John Hagan & Calvin Morrill, "Seeing Crime and Punishment through a Sociological Lens: Contributions, Practices, and the Future," 2005 University of Chicago Legal Forum 289 (2005). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Seeing Crime and Punishment Through a Sociological Lens: Contributions, Practices, and the Futue A Conversation with Calvin Morill, John Hagantt BernardE. Harcourtttt and Tracey Mearettt t* There is a rich intellectual history to the sociological study of crime and punishment that encompasses multiple and inter- related traditions.' Some of these traditions trace their roots to the European social theorists of the nineteenth century, particu- larly Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Karl Marx. Although only Durkheim and Weber systematically studied law (and only Durkheim actually studied punishment), all three social theo- rists facilitated the development of sociological research and the- ory on crime and punishment. Durkheim's Suicide: A Study in Sociology 2 for example, investigated the relationship between t Calvin Morrill is Professor and Chair of Sociology at the University of California at Irvine, and is Professor of Criminology, Law, and Society at the School of Social Ecology and Professor of Business at the Merage School of Business at the University of Califor- nia at Irvine. tt John Hagan is the John D. MacArthur Professor of Sociology and Law at North- western University and a Senior Research Fellow at the American Bar Foundation. ltt Bernard E. Harcourt is Professor of Law and Faculty Director of Academic Affairs at the University of Chicago Law School. ttt Tracey L. Meares is the Max Pam Professor of Law and the Director of the Center for Studies in Criminal Justice at the University of Chicago Law School and a Research Fellow at the American Bar Foundation. * Special thanks to Calvin Morrill for writing the historical overview in the introduc- tion to this conversation; and to Brian Hill, Angela Russo, and the editors of The Univer- sity of Chicago Legal Forum for organizing the Symposium. 1 Although this history is too complex and our space in this article too limited for a complete recounting, it may be useful for readers to understand, in a shorthand way, some of the intellectual backdrop to our conversation at the University of Chicago Legal Forum's Nineteenth Annual Symposium, "Punishment and Crime" (Nov 13, 2004). 2 Emile Durkheim, Suicide: A Study in Sociology 145 (Free Press 1951) (discussing how social factors affect different types of suicide, such as "egoistic suicide," "altruistic suicide," and "anomic suicide"). 289 HeinOnline -- 2005 U. Chi. Legal F. 289 2005 290 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LEGAL FORUM [2005: social integration and suicide rates, which, in turn, provided a model of inquiry for multiple generations of sociologists investi- gating the social causes of crime, delinquency, and social devi- ance.3 Similarly, Durkheim's The Division of Labor in Society inspired sociologists to examine the relationship between social structure and the organization of law and punishment.5 Weber's ideas concerning the "rationalization" of society and the legiti- mate bases of legal authority compelled sociologists to think comparatively and brought a historical dimension to sociological inquiry on law and punishment.6 Marxist sensibilities begat a small, but vibrant, industry of radical criminologists and sociolo- gists of law and punishment who located both the causes and control of crime in the exploitation, injustice, and class conflict inherent in capitalist society.7 3 A notable example in this line of inquiry comes from the work of Travis Hirschi, who drew from Durkheim's concept of "anomic" suicide (in which suicide is associated with social normlessness) to formulate his "social contro theory of delinquency. See Travis Hirschi, Causes ofDelinquency 17 (Transaction 2d ed 2002). From the perspective of social control theory, individuals with weak social ties to conventional institutions (hence weak normative regulation), such as the family or schools, are more likely to com- mit crime than those with strong ties. Social control theory later became "self-control" theory in which normative conformity is premised upon the effectiveness of primary so- cialization into mainstream values and practices. See Michael R. Gottfredson and Travis Hirschi, A General Theory of Crime 154-68 (Stanford 1990). Although Robert K Merton's classic work on social structure and deviance did not cite Durkheim, his core idea that deviance and crime result from individual commitments to mainstream values to succeed in American society, coupled with a lack of means (such as education or employment) and/or blocked pathways (due, for example, to racial discrimination), echoes the theoreti- cal logic in Durkheim's arguments that "egoistic" suicide correlates with disjunctures between normative regulations and individual goals. See Robert K Merton, Social Struc- ture and Anomie, 3 Am Soc Rev 672, 679 (1938). 4 Emile Durkheim, The Division ofLaborin Society(Free Press 1964). 5 Perhaps the most well-known application of Durkheim's approach in this regard is Donald Black, The Behavior of Law (Academic 1976), where Black argues that the quan- tity and style of legal social control varies with the social structural locations of those involved, including social status and intimacy. 6 Weber's influence can be seen, for example, in Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison 231 (Pantheon 1977). Foucault argues, among other things, that intensive rationalization, as evidenced in the designs and techniques of pris- ons, ultimately produces the very phenomena that these institutions ostensibly seek to control. See also David Garland, The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Con- temporary Society 167 (Chicago 2001) (drawing directly from Foucault and indirectly from Weber to document the increase and density of penal and social controls during the last few decades in two archetypically democratic societies, Britain and the United States); Bernard E. Harcourt, Illusion of Order: The False Promise of Broken Windows Policing140-80 (Harvard 2001) (drawing on Foucault's work to re-examine the nature of order and broken-windows policing). 7 The earliest work on law and punishment along these lines is George Rusche and Otto Kirchheimer, Puzishment and Social Structure (Russell & Russell 1939) (describing the historical interaction between punishment practices and the development of social conditions and class structure). See also David F. Greenberg, ed, Crime and Capitalism: Readings in Marxist Criminology(Temple 2d ed 1993) (bringing together the writings of HeinOnline -- 2005 U. Chi. Legal F. 290 2005 289] THROUGHA SOCIOLOGICAL LENS 291 As influential as these theorists have been, not all sociologi- cal work on crime and punishment descends in a "top-down" fashion from these European sources. There is also a long tradi- tion in American sociology of "bottom-up" inquiry that begins with an intensive empirical inquiry into the dynamics of crime and punishment and builds conceptual frameworks upon that foundation. Perhaps the most influential bottom-up tradition in the sociology of crime and punishment originated in the Sociol- ogy Department at the University of Chicago in the 1920s. Re- searchers associated with the early "Chicago School" of sociology, as it came to be known, approached the study of crime and pun- ishment with the reform-minded concerns of the Progressive Era and the philosophical underpinnings of American pragmatism.' A hallmark of the Chicago approach was intensive, qualitative fieldwork, especially aimed at understanding the relationships between social "disorganization" (such as fragmented families and community institutions) and undesirable social "outcomes" in Chicago's vast immigrant neighborhoods (including criminal- ity, as well as chronic unemployment and homelessness).9 These commitments, in turn, fed into a flowering of influential field- based studies of crime and delinquency during the 1920s, 1930s, and early 1940s. 10 Among the most influential of the works based twentieth-century radical sociological criminologists with Marx's and Frederick Engels' disparate writings on crime and punishment); Douglas Hay, et al, Albion's Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth-CenturyEngland (Pantheon 1975) (providing a histori- cal sociological examination of crime and punishment from a Marxist perspective). 8 John F. Galliher, Chicago's Two Worlds of Deviance Research: Whose Side Are They On?, in Gary Alan Fine, ed, A Second Chicago School: The Development ofPostwar American Sociology 164, 166-68 (Chicago 1995) (describing the development of the "Chi- cago School" of sociology). 9 Burgess, for example, directed dozens of dissertations that touched on both social disorganization and legal processing of crime among Chicago's immigrants.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wish 1 Week 7 (3/2): SOCIAL CONTROL THEORY and LIFE
    Week 7 (3/2): SOCIAL CONTROL THEORY AND LIFE-COURSE VARIANTS Hirschi, Travis. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press. Chapter 1 Hirschi sets out to explain the differences between control theory, strain theory, and cultural deviance or differential association theories. He offers several criticisms of strain theory, including the fact that strain theory is often unable to account for the desistence from crime after adolescence/during adulthood, the inability of strain theory to account for crime in the middle and upper economic classes, and strain theory’s suggestion that people who accept legitimate goals or whose values conform to those of the larger society are more likely to commit crime (p. 6-10). Hirschi differentiates between control and strain theories by suggesting that control theory “assumes variation in morality” while strain theory assumes that morality/moral values lead to the pressures that result in crime as an attempt to quickly and easily achieve goals (p. 10-11). (Chapter 2 deals exclusively with the definition of control theory). Hirschi also explains “theories of cultural deviance” as similar to differential association. Such theories postulate that while crime or deviance may violate the norms or standards of the majority of society, they also represent a conformity to other norms and standards shared only by a subset of the society. Cultural deviance theory thus explains crime as learned through interactions with specific subsets of the population who have different norms and standards (that accept certain criminal or deviant behaviors shunned by the majority of society). Hirschi points out that while he cannot outright reject cultural deviance theories, they are markedly different in both method and type of findings from social control theories.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Impact of Criminological Theory on Community Corrections Practice
    December 2016 15 An Examination of the Impact of Criminological Theory on Community Corrections Practice James Byrne University of Massachusetts Lowell Don Hummer Penn State Harrisburg CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES ABOUT parole officers in terms of practical advice; to other community corrections programs are to why people commit crime are used—and mis- the contrary, we think a discussion of “cause” is be successful as “people changing” agencies. used—every day by legislative policy makers critical to the ongoing debate over the appro- But can we reasonably expect such diversity and community corrections managers when priate use of community-based sanctions, and flexibility from community corrections they develop new initiatives, sanctions, and and the development of effective community agencies, or is it more likely that one theory— programs; and these theories are also being corrections policies, practices, and programs. or group of theories—will be the dominant applied—and misapplied—by line commu­ However, the degree of uncertainty on the influence on community corrections practice? nity corrections officers in the workplace as cause—or causes—of our crime problem in Based on recent reviews of United States cor­ they classify, supervise, counsel, and con­ the academic community suggests that a rections history, we suspect that one group of trol offenders placed on their caseloads. The certain degree of skepticism is certainly in theories—supported by a dominant political purpose of this article is to provide a brief order when “new” crime control strategies are ideology—will continue to dominate until overview of the major theories of crime causa­ introduced. We need to look carefully at the the challenges to its efficacy move the field— tion and then to consider the implications of theory of crime causation on which these new both ideologically and theoretically—in a new these criminological theories for current and initiatives are based.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Idea: Hirschi's Social Bond/Social Control Theory
    FIVE KEY IDEA: HIRSCHI’S SOCIAL BOND/SOCIAL CONTROL THEORY KEYWORK Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press. ravis Hirschi’s social bond/social control theory has remained a major paradigm in criminology since its introduction in 1969. To be sure, Tfew theories have generated as much empirical attention, or have sparked as much debate within the field, as Hirschi’s theory. It has been tested by scholars extensively (Akers & Sellers, 2008) and has been the source of heated disagreements among scholars on both theoretical and empirical grounds (Lilly, Cullen, & Ball, 2007). Hirschi himself has remained a lead- ing figure in the discipline for over four decades now and continues to be among the most cited criminologists year after year (Wright, 2002). Indeed, few scholars can claim to have been this relevant to the field for this long. This was no accident—there’s a reason why his ideas have “caught on” where other ideas (even those that seem to be eerily similar) have been ignored, and such is the focus of this chapter. 55 56 KEY IDEAS IN CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF THE 1960S The 1960s were an interesting time in American history for a variety of reasons. This was the decade of clashing values that brought us acid rock; police dogs and fire hoses set upon civil rights demonstrators in the South; Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird and Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest; phrases like “free love” pitted against laws prohibiting the use of contraception; the burning of draft cards and the fleeing of draft dodgers to Canada; skateboards; miniskirts; the Black Panthers; the assas- sinations of John and Bobby Kennedy and of Martin Luther King, the pres- ence of non-white athletes Roberto Clemente, Willie Mays, and Hank Aaron in major league baseball; the burning of bras by feminists, and the riots at the Democratic National Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth of Criminological Theories
    THE GROWTH OF CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORIES Jonathon M. Heidt B.A., University of Montana, 2000 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the School of Criminology OJonathon M. Heidt 2003 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY November 2003 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Jonathon Heidt Degree: M.A. Title of Thesis: The Growth of Criminological Theories Examining Committee: Chair: ~ridnkurtch,P~JJ$ . D;. Robert ~ordoi,kh.~. Senior Supervisor Dr. Elizabeth Elliott, Ph.D. Member Sociology Department University at Albany - SUNY Date Approved: PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Project/Extended Essay The Growth of Criminological Theories Author: Name ABSTRACT In the last 50 years, an extensive array of theories has appeared within the field of criminology, many generated by the discipline of sociology.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentric Zone Theory
    Lecture-04 M.A.(Semester-II) PAPER-8 Urban Sociology CONCENTRIC ZONE THEORY Dr. Shankar Kumar Lal University Department of Sociology Lalit Narayan Mithila University Kameshwarnagar,Darbhanga E-mail: [email protected] Mobile: +91-8252199182 CONCENTRIC ZONE THEORY ORIGIN . Developed in the 1920’s by Ernest Burgess and Robert Park, University of Chicago . Hypothesis of this theory is that cities grow and develop outwardly in concentric zones. Sought to explain the socioeconomic divides in and out of the city . Model was based on Chicago’s city layout . First theory to explain the distribution of social groups CONCENTRIC ZONE THEORY….? • Social structures extend outward from one central business area. • Population density decreases towards outward zones • Shows correlation between socioeconomic status and the distance from the central business district • Also known as the Burgess Model, the Bull’s Eye Model, the Concentric Ring Model, or the Concentric Circles Model. Concentric Zone Model ZONE 1: CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT(CBD) • Non-residential center for business. • “Downtown” area • Emphasis on business and commerce • Commuted to by residents of other zones Commercial centre . First, the inner most ring zone or nucleolus of the city is a commercial centre also called Central Business District (CBD) in North America and western countries. This zone is characterized by high intensity of commercial, social and civic amenities. It is the heart of the city which includes department stores, office buildings, shops, banks, clubs, hotels, theatres and many other civic buildings. Being the centre of commercial activities and location, it is accessible from all directions and attracts a large number of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Criminology
    PART 1 © Nevarpp/iStockphoto/Getty Images Introduction to Criminology CHAPTER 1 Crime and Criminology. 3 CHAPTER 2 The Incidence of Crime . 35 1 © Tithi Luadthong/Shutterstock CHAPTER 1 Crime and Criminology Crime and the fear of crime have permeated the fabric of American life. —Warren E. Burger, Chief Justice, U.S. Supreme Court1 Collective fear stimulates herd instinct, and tends to produce ferocity toward those who are not regarded as members of the herd. —Bertrand Russell2 OBJECTIVES • Define criminology, and understand how this field of study relates to other social science disciplines. Pg. 4 • Understand the meaning of scientific theory and its relationship to research and policy. Pg. 8 • Recognize how the media shape public perceptions of crime. Pg. 19 • Know the criteria for establishing causation, and identify the attributes of good research. Pg. 13 • Understand the politics of criminology and the importance of social context. Pg. 18 • Define criminal law, and understand the conflict and consensus perspectives on the law. Pg. 5 • Describe the various schools of criminological theory and the explanations that they provide. Pg. 9 of the public’s concern about the safety of their com- Introduction munities, crime is a perennial political issue that can- Crime is a social phenomenon that commands the didates for political office are compelled to address. attention and energy of the American public. When Dealing with crime commands a substantial por- crime statistics are announced or a particular crime tion of the country’s tax dollars. Criminal justice sys- goes viral, the public demands that “something be tem operations (police, courts, prisons) cost American done.” American citizens are concerned about their taxpayers over $270 billion annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago School (Sociology)
    Chicago school (sociology) In sociology and later criminology, the Chicago school (sometimes described as the ecological school) was the first major body of works emerging during the 1920s and 1930s specializing in urban sociology, and the research into the urban environment by combining theory and ethnographic fieldwork in Chicago, now applied elsewhere. While involving scholars at several Chicago area universities, the term is often used interchangeably to refer to the University of Chicago's sociology department. Following the Second World War, a "second Chicago school" arose whose members used symbolic interactionism combined with methods of field research (today often referred to asethnography ), to create a new body of work.[1] The major researchers in the first Chicago school included Nels Anderson, Ernest Burgess, Ruth Shonle Cavan, Edward Franklin Frazier, Everett Hughes, Roderick D. McKenzie, George Herbert Mead, Robert E. Park, Walter C. Reckless, Edwin Sutherland, W. I. Thomas [1], Frederic Thrasher, Louis Wirth, and Florian Znaniecki. The activist, social scientist, and Nobel Peace Prize winner Jane Addams also forged and maintained close ties with some of the members of the Chicago school of sociology. Contents Discussion Ecology and social theories Conclusions References References Other references Discussion The Chicago school is best known for its urban sociology and for the development of the symbolic interactionist approach, notably through the work of Herbert Blumer. It has focused on human behavior as shaped by social structures and physical environmental factors, rather than genetic and personal characteristics. Biologists and anthropologists had accepted the theory of evolution as demonstrating that animals adapt to their environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Bibliography on the History of American Sociology
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2005 Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology Michael R. Hill [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology" (2005). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 348. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/348 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R., (Compiler). 2005. Centennial Bibliography of the History of American Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. CENTENNIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN SOCIOLOGY Compiled by MICHAEL R. HILL Editor, Sociological Origins In consultation with the Centennial Bibliography Committee of the American Sociological Association Section on the History of Sociology: Brian P. Conway, Michael R. Hill (co-chair), Susan Hoecker-Drysdale (ex-officio), Jack Nusan Porter (co-chair), Pamela A. Roby, Kathleen Slobin, and Roberta Spalter-Roth. © 2005 American Sociological Association Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: Each part is separately paginated, with the number of pages in each part as indicated below in square brackets. The total page count for the entire file is 224 pages. To navigate within the document, please use navigation arrows and the Bookmark feature provided by Adobe Acrobat Reader.® Users may search this document by utilizing the “Find” command (typically located under the “Edit” tab on the Adobe Acrobat toolbar).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Eight: Deviance and Social Control
    Chapter Eight: Deviance and Social Control Chapter Summary Sociologists use the term deviance to refer to any violation of rules and norms. From a sociological perspective, deviance is relative. Definitions of “what is deviant” vary across societies and from one group to another within the same society. Howard S. Becker described the interpretation of deviance as, “…not the act itself, but the reaction to the act that makes something deviant.” This coincides with the symbolic interactionist view. In some cases, an individual need not do anything to be labeled a deviant. He or she may be falsely accused or discredited because of a birth defect, race, or disease. Even crime is relative when interpreting the deviance of the actor. Deviance is based on adherence to and violation of norms. Human groups need norms to exist. By making behavior predictable, norms make social life possible. Consequently, all human groups develop a system of social control, which involves formal and informal means of enforcing norms. Those who violate these norms face the danger of being labeled “deviant.” Violators can expect to experience negative sanctions for the violation of norms. Members of society who conform to societal norms, especially those who go above and beyond what is commonly expected, receive positive sanctions. In some societies, such as the Amish, shaming is a common negative sanction that acts strongly as a means of social control, minimizing deviance. Biologists, psychologists, and sociologists have different perspectives on why people violate norms. Biological explanations focus on genetic predispositions, psychologists concentrate on abnormalities within the individual (commonly known as personality disorders), and sociologists look at social factors outside the individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Control Vs. Social Control As an Explanation for Delinquency
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 2003 Self-control vs. social control as an explanation for delinquency. Marcel Joseph Parent University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Parent, Marcel Joseph, "Self-control vs. social control as an explanation for delinquency." (2003). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3415. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/3415 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. SELF-CONTROL VS. SOCIAL CONTROL AS AN EXPLANATION FOR DELINQUENCY by Marcel Parent Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research through Sociology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology 4111 (Uggen): Deviant Behavior Midterm Review, Spring 2004
    Sociology 4111 (Uggen): Deviant Behavior Midterm Review, Spring 2004 PART I: BASIC CONCEPTS -- DEVIANCE, CONTROL, AND CAREERS I. Social Facts and Social Constructions II. Defining Deviance a. Clinard’s Definitions of Deviance (Statistical, Absolutist, Reactivist, Normative) b. Adlers’ definition’s i. Deviance as violation of social norms (Attitudes, Behaviors, Conditions, Prescriptive norms, Proscriptive norms) ii. Role iii. Subcultures iv. Power v. Moral entrepreneurs c. Kai Erikson (1966) III. Differences between Criminology and Deviance a. Piece in The Criminologist: b. Heckert: positive deviance i. Altruism (hero) ii. Charisma (dictator) iii. Innovation (artist) iv. Supra-Conformity (4.0) v. Innate/Ascribed (beauty) vi. Ex-Deviant (saved) c. Middle Class norms - Typology of Deviance IV. Social Controls and the Hobbesian Problem of Order a. Thomas Hobbes i. “Hobbesian problem of order” ii. How can we create a society in which self-interested people don’t use force and fraud to satisfy their (criminal, sexual, substance-abusing …) wants? iii. 3 “solutions” to Hobbesian dilemma 1. Normative 2. Exchange 3. Conflict iv. Informal social controls v. Formal social controls b. social controls and constructions i. Clinard: Deviant Events in Context ii. Joel Best: Social Constructionism c. Race and formal control i. Anderson on police as social control ii. Local perspective/Why focus on police? V. Introduction to Deviant Careers (of people, firms, nations…) a. Becoming Deviant b. Phases of the Deviant Career 1 VI. Subcultures, Power, and “Unconventional Sentimentality” (5 min. video: The Wall) a. Chambliss: Saints and Roughnecks b. Sanchez Jankowski: Joining a Gang c. Fox: Real Punks and Pretenders PART II: THEORIES OF DEVIANCE AND SOCIETAL REACTION VII.
    [Show full text]
  • Employee Theft: a Study of the Major Sociological, Economic
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF IRENE ELAINE VOIT for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN INTER- DISCIPLINARY STUDIES in BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, ECONOMICS, AND SOCIOLOGY presented on MAY 1, 1978 Title: EMPLOYEE THEFT: A STUDY OF THE MAJOR SOCIOLOGICAL, ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS CAUSAL THEORIES Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: DR. MATT M. AMANO Although employee theft is claimed by many authors to be a significant problem in America with corrosive and damaging effects upon business and society, very little research has been done to establish the causes of such behavior. The purpose of this thesis was to identify, discuss, and critically evaluate theories that might have the potential to explain the etiology of employee theft. To discover the most promising theories necessitated searching the literature of several disciplines, including criminology/sociology, business, and economics. A surprisingly small amount of literature that could be considered of a serious or research nature that was concerned specifically with employee theft could be uncovered. It became necessary to broaden the search to include major theories on the etiology of crime in general and to determine their applicability and value in the study of employee theft. Differential association theory, alienation theory, labeling theory, and cost/benefit analysis were identified as having potential value despite their cited shortcomings. The final chapter compared the approaches of the theories, discussed how current research methodology is deficient, and suggested areas for future
    [Show full text]