Integrated Renewable Resource Management for U.S. Insular Areas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrated Renewable Resource Management for U.S. Insular Areas Integrated Renewable Resource Management for U.S. Insular Areas June 1987 NTIS order #PB87-205829 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Integrated Renewable Resource Management for U.S. Insular Areas, OTA-F-325 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, June 1987). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 86-600595 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (order form on p. 443) Foreword The United States has political, economic, humanitarian, and strategic interests in sus- tained economic development of U.S.-affiliated Caribbean and Pacific islands. Despite a U.S. commitment to support the economic vitality of these islands, most have become less self- reliant in food and fiber production, and now depend increasingly on Federal funding for jobs, public welfare, and food and other goods and services to the islands. Interest in the development of increased self-reliance in U.S.-affiliated islands has grown significantly in the last two decades. After 16 years of negotiation, the Congress, the United Nations and three governments emerging from the former Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands —the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Common- wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands—approved agreements redefining their relationships with the United States. The remaining agreement, with the Republic of Palau, is expected soon, thus terminating the only remaining trusteeship created by the United Nations after World War II. Concomitant with the interest in development of island self-government has been concern over development of self-reliance. Similarly, the economic well-being of the U.S.-affiliated Caribbean islands has come under increasing scrutiny due to the growing strate- gic importance of the Caribbean Basin, and the implementation of the Caribbean Basin Initiative, Several factors contributing to the growing dependence of U.S.-affiliated islands include: scant natural resources and long distances between islands and sources of inputs, products, or markets; rapidly growing populations; tropical resource characteristics with generally high natural productivity but extreme vulnerability to disruption; and common histories of significant resource degradation. Despite the latter, the economic constraints posed by size and isolation of many of these islands dictate that much of the productive sector be based on renewable resources—agriculture, aquiculture, fisheries, and tourism. Renewable resource development can help foster self-sufficiency, but certain approaches are not compatible with sustained development (e. g., harvesting resources until long-term productivity is lost, resources are depleted, or the environment is degraded). Similarly, pol- icies, programs, and projects that seriously conflict with local cultures and customs are likely to be counterproductive. The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, in 1984, requested the Office of Technology Assessment to conduct an assessment of the constraints to development of insular resource-based enterprises, and the opportunities to improve sustainable renewable resource development and management on the U.S.-affiliated islands. The House Commit- tee on Interior and Insular Affairs endorsed the request. The assessment identifies and dis- cusses in-depth some constraints and opportunities to integrated management of renewa- ble resources on these islands. OTA greatly appreciates the contributions of its advisory panel and workshop partici- pants assembled for the study, and the authors of the commissioned papers. We are espe- cially grateful for the time and effort donated by the numerous contributors who served as reviewers and as liaisons from the insular governments and other government agencies. In addition, we would like to thank those from within OTA who provided assistance, particu- larly Dr. Gordon Law of the International Security and Commerce Program. As with all OTA studies the content of the report is the sole responsibility of OTA. iii Integrated Renewable Resources Management for U.S. Insular Areas Advisory Panel Fernando Abruna Jerome McElroy Soil Scientist (retired) Department of Business Administration and Puerto Rico Economics John S. Corbin Saint Mary’s College Aquiculture Development Program Dieter Mueller-Dombois Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Department of Botany Resources University of Hawaii Eric Dillingham Robert Owen Farmer Chief Conservation Officer (retired) U.S. Virgin Islands Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands Lucius G. Eldredge Maria T. Pangelinan Micronesian Area Research Center Saipan Farmers Cooperative Association University of Guam Frank Peterson Sam Falanruw Department of Geology and Geophysics Department of Resources and Development University of Hawaii Yap State Government Allen Putney Michael J. Gawel Eastern Caribbean Natural Areas Chief of Marine Resources Management Program Federated States of Micronesia West Indies Lab Michael Hamnett Ralph Schmidt Pacific Islands Development Program Forest Division East/West Center Food and Agriculture Organization Stanley Hosie Rome, Italy Foundation for the Peoples of the South Ace Tago Pacific Pacific Management and Research Carolyn Imamura Associates planning and Programs Edward Towle Pacific Basin Development Council Island Resources Foundation Robert E. Johannes Patrick Williams Division of Fisheries Research Commissioner of Agriculture CSIRO Marine Laboratories U.S. Virgin Islands Shelley M. Mark Adrian Winkel Department of Agriculture and Resource Former High Commissioner Economics Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands University of Hawaii John Matuszak VI Cooperative Extension Service College of the Virgin Islands NOTE: OTA appreciates and is grateful for the valuable assistance and thoughtful critiques provided by the reviewers. The reviewers do not, however, necessarily approve, disapprove, or endorse this report. OTA assumes full responsibility for the report and the accuracy of its contents. iv OTA Project Staff on Integrated Renewable Resource Management of U.S. Insular Areas Roger Herdman, Assistant Director, OTA Health and Life Sciences Division Walter E. Parham, Program Manager Food and Renewable Resources Program Alison L. Hess, Project Director Analytical Staff Patricia J. Durana, Research Analyst1 David S. Liem, Analyst 2 Eric Passaglia, Special Assistant and Spanish Translator Meriwether Wilson, Research Analyst2 Susan J. Wintsch, Contracted Editor Benjamin Yarofmal, Research Assistant4 Clerical Staff Patricia Durana5 Rebecca Erickson6 Sally Shafroth7 Administrative Assistants Carolyn Swann Nellie Hammond Secretaries 1From August 1985. 2From January 1985 to May 1986. 3From June 1985 to September 1985. 4From May 1986 to August 1986. 5From October 1984 to August 1985. 6From August 1985 to November 1986. 7From November 1986. CONTENTS Page Chapter l. Executive Summary . 3 Chapter 2. Introduction . 39 Chapter 3 Island Structure and Resource Systems . 49 Chapter 4. Island Renewable Resource History and Trends . 83 Chapter 5. Islands As Integrated Systems . .......131 Chapter 6. Management of Terrestrial Resources: Agriculture, Agroforestry, and Forestry . .......185 Chapter 7. Management of Aquatic Resources: Nearshore Fisheries and Aquiculture. .221 Chapter 8. Technologies Supporting Agricultural, Aquacultural, and Fisheries Development . .275 Chapter 9. Resource Development Planning for U.S.-Affiliated Islands ... ..3l9 Chapter 10. Issues and Options for the U.S. Congress . ..................347 Appendix A. Maps of the U.S.-Affiliated Islands . ..............369 Appendix B. Other U.S. Island Possessions in the Tropical Pacific ....... 373 Appendix C. U.S. Military Presence in U.S.-Affiliated Islands . ...........377 Appendix D. Integration of Traditional and Modern Law.... ....,...... 381 Appendix E. Organizations Dealing With Renewable Resource Management in the U.S.-Affiliated Carribbean and Pacific Islands .. ....384 Appendix F. Summary of Regional Workshops . ...406 Appendix G. Commissioned Papers . ..........................426 Appendix H. Glossary of Acronyms and Terms . ....429 Index . .. 437 Chapter 1 Summary CONTENTS Page Introduction . 2 Insular Resource History and Trends. 6 Insular Renewable Resources . 7 Islands as Integrated Resource Systems. : . 9 Constraints to the Sustainable Development of Renewable Resources . 10 Opportunities for the Sustainable Development and Use of Renewable Resources . 11 Development Goals and Strategies . 13 Introduction . 13 Agriculture, Agroforestry and Forestry . 13 Nearshore Fisheries and Aquiculture. 18 Technologies To Support Resource Development . 21 Preharvest Control Technologies . 21 Food Preservation and Processing . 22 Market Development . 22 Cooperatives . 22 Vertical Integration of Operations . 22 Technologies To Support Resource Sustainability . 23 Agriculture . 23 Fisheries . 23 Technologies To Support Resource Recovery. 26 Integrating Technologies , . ........ 26 Planning/Policy Considerations . 28 Summary of Issues and Options for the U.S. Congress . 30 Congressional Oversight and Federal Agency Coordination Issues . 30 Data Collection and Information Management Issues . 32 Research Issues . 33 Education, Extension, and Training Issues . 35 Incentive Issues . 36 Table Table No. Page l-1. Population, Land Areas, and Estimated U.S. Federal Expenditures in U.S.-Affiliated Islands. 5 Figures Figure No. Page l-1. U.S.-Affiliated Caribbean Islands and Neighboring
Recommended publications
  • OGC-98-5 U.S. Insular Areas: Application of the U.S. Constitution
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on GAO Resources, House of Representatives November 1997 U.S. INSULAR AREAS Application of the U.S. Constitution GAO/OGC-98-5 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of the General Counsel B-271897 November 7, 1997 The Honorable Don Young Chairman Committee on Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: More than 4 million U.S. citizens and nationals live in insular areas1 under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Territorial Clause of the Constitution authorizes the Congress to “make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property” of the United States.2 Relying on the Territorial Clause, the Congress has enacted legislation making some provisions of the Constitution explicitly applicable in the insular areas. In addition to this congressional action, courts from time to time have ruled on the application of constitutional provisions to one or more of the insular areas. You asked us to update our 1991 report to you on the applicability of provisions of the Constitution to five insular areas: Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (the CNMI), American Samoa, and Guam. You asked specifically about significant judicial and legislative developments concerning the political or tax status of these areas, as well as court decisions since our earlier report involving the applicability of constitutional provisions to these areas. We have included this information in appendix I. 1As we did in our 1991 report on this issue, Applicability of Relevant Provisions of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinarian Shortage Situation Nomination Form
    Shortage ID VMLRP USE ONLY NIFA Veterinary Medicine National Institute of Food and Agriculture Loan Repayment Program (VMLRP) US Department of Agriculture Form NIFA 2009‐0001 OMB Control No. 0524‐0050 Veterinarian Shortage Situation Expiration Date: 9/30/2019 Nomination Form To be submitted under the authority of the chief State or Insular Area Animal Health Official Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program (VMLRP) This form must be used for Nomination of Veterinarian Shortage Situations to the Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program (VMLRP), Authorized Under the National Veterinary Medical Service Act (NVMSA) Note: Please submit one separate nomination form for each shortage situation. See the State Animal Health Official (SAHO) section of the VMLRP web site (www.nifa.usda.gov/vmlrp) for the number of nominations permitted for your state or insular area. Location of Veterinary Shortage Area for this Nomination Location of Veterinary Shortage: (e.g., County, State/Insular Area; must be a logistically feasible veterinary practice service area) Approximate Center of Shortage Area (or Location of Position if Type III): (e.g., Address or Cross Street, Town/City, and Zip Code) Overall Priority of Shortage: ______________ Type of Veterinary Practice Area/Discipline/Specialty (select one) : ________________________________________________________________________________ For Type I or II Private Practice: Must cover(check at least one) May cover Beef Cattle Beef Cattle Dairy Cattle Dairy Cattle Swine Swine Poultry Poultry Small
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinarian Shortage Situation Nomination Form
    4IPSUBHF*% AK163 7.-3164&0/-: NIFAVeterinaryMedicine NationalInstituteofFoodandAgriculture LoanRepaymentProgram(VMLRP) USDepartmentofAgriculture FormNIFA2009Ͳ0001 OMBControlNo.0524Ͳ0046 VeterinarianShortageSituation ExpirationDate:11/30/2016 NominationForm Tobesubmitted undertheauthorityofthechiefStateorInsularAreaAnimalHealthOfficial VeterinaryMedicineLoanRepaymentProgram(VMLRP) ThisformmustbeusedforNominationofVeterinarianShortageSituationstotheVeterinaryMedicineLoanRepaymentProgram (VMLRP),AuthorizedUndertheNationalVeterinaryMedicalServiceAct(NVMSA) Note:Pleasesubmitoneseparatenominationformforeachshortagesituation.SeetheStateAnimalHealthOfficial(SAHO)sectionof theVMLRPwebsite(www.nifa.usda.gov/vmlrp)forthenumberofnominationspermittedforyourstateorinsulararea. LocationofVeterinaryShortageAreaforthisNomination Kenai Peninsula, Alaska LocationofVeterinaryShortage: (e.g.,County,State/InsularArea;mustbealogisticallyfeasibleveterinarypracticeservicearea) ApproximateCenterofShortageArea Kenai or Soldotna: area extends from Portage (just south of Anchorage down to (orLocationofPositionifTypeIII): Homer at the tip of the Kenai Peninsula) (e.g.,AddressorCrossStreet,Town/City,andZipCode) OverallPriorityofShortage: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@Critical Priority TypeofVeterinaryPracticeArea/Discipline/Specialty;ƐĞůĞĐƚŽŶĞͿ͗ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@Type II: Private Practice - Rural Area, Food Animal Medicine (awardee obligation: at least 30%@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ FTE or 12hr/week) &ŽƌdLJƉĞ/Žƌ//WƌŝǀĂƚĞWƌĂĐƚŝĐĞ͗ Musƚcover(checkĂtleastone)
    [Show full text]
  • America&Apos;S Unknown Avifauna: the Birds of the Mariana Islands
    ß ß that time have been the basis for con- America's unknown avifauna. siderable concern (Vincent, 1967) and indeed appear to be the basis for the the birds of inclusion of several Mariana birds in the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (1976) list of the Mariana Islands Endangered Species.These brief war- time observationswere important, but no significant investigationshave been conductedin the ensuingthirty yearsto "Probably no otherAmerican birds determine the extent to which the are aspoorly known as these." endemic avifauna of these islands may haverecovered. Importantly, no assess- mentshave been made of the impactof H. Douglas Pratt, Phillip L. Bruner the military's aerial planting of the exoticscrubby tree known as tangan- and Delwyn G. Berrett tangan, Leucaenaglauca, to promote revegetationafter the war. This 'treeis known as "koa haole" in Hawaii. restricted both in their time for bird ß ß announcesthe signthat greets observation and in their movements on v•sitors to Guam. Few Americans realize the islands. Their studies were made in authorsURING THEvisitedSUMMER the islandsOF1076the of that the nation's westernmost territories 1945 and 1946 when most of the Mari- Saipan,Tinian, Rota, and Guam, and m he across the International Date Line in anaswere just beginningto recoverfrom 1978 Bruner and Pratt returned to Sai- the far westernPacific. Guam, the larg- the ravagesof war (Baker, 1946).Never- pan and Guam. We havespent a total of est and southernmost of the Mariana theless, population estimates made at 38 man/dayson Saipan,four on Tinian, Islands,has been a United Statesposses- s•on since Spain surrendered her sov- & Agrihan ereigntyover the island at the end of the Sparash-AmericanWar.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and Insular Area Grants: Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA) Request for Applications
    &EPA United States Office of Transportation and Air Quality Environmental Protection March 2021 Agency Coming Soon: Tribal and Insular Area Grants: Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA) Request for Applications Request for Application (RFA) opens late April 2021 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is excited to announce plans to request applications for projects that achieve significant reductions in diesel emissions. EPA anticipates awarding approximately $5 million in total DERA funding and plans to have no mandatory cost share requirement for projects. Eligible Organizations Eligible entities include tribal governments (or intertribal consortia) and Alaska Native villages, or insular area government agencies which have jurisdiction over transportation or air quality. Insular areas include the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 2021 Tribal and Insular Area RFA Highlights TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS (OR INTERTRIBAL INSULAR AREA GOVERNMENTS CONSORTIA) AND ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGES • Approximately $4.5 Million • Approximately $500,000 • Funding Limit per Application: $800,000 • Funding Limit per Application: $250,000 • Two Applications per Applicant • Two Applications per Applicant Although funding for both tribes and insular areas is planned under this single RFA, the applications will be competed separately. Tribal and insular area applications will be reviewed, ranked, and selected by separate review panels. Anticipated Timeline and Dates Description Date* RFA Opens Late April, 2021 Informational Webinars EPA will host three webinars to accommodate the different time zones and schedules RFA Closes – Applications Due Early July, 2021 Anticipated Notification of Selection Mid August, 2021 Anticipated Award October-December 2021 *Finalized dates will be posted online at www.epa.gov/dera when the RFA officially opens.
    [Show full text]
  • Guam 179: Facing Te New,Pacific Era
    , DOCONBOT Busehis BD 103 349 RC 011 911 TITLE Guam 179: Facing te New,Pacific Era. AnnualEconom c. Review. INSTITUTION .Guam Dept. of Commerce, Agana. SPONS AGENCY Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Aug 79 . NOTE 167p.: Docugent prepared by the Economic,Research Center. EDRS ?RICE . 1F01/PC07Plus 'Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annual Reports: Business: *Demography: *Economic Dpveloptlent4 Employment Patternp:Expenditures: Federal GoVernment: Financial, Support: *Government Role:_Local Government: *Productivity;_ Vahles (Data); Tourism - IDENTIFIER, *Guam Micronesia A ABSTRACT Socioeconomic conditions and developmentSare analysed.in thiseport, designed to ge. useful\ tb plannersin government and t_vr,. rivate sector. The introduction sunrmarizes Guam's economic olthook emphasizing the eftect of federalfunds for reconstruction folloVing SupertirphAon.Pamela in 1976,moderate growth ,in tour.ism,,and Guam's pqtential to partici:pateas a staging point in trade between the United States and mainlandQhina The body of the report contains populaktion, employment, and incomestatistics; an -account of th(ik economic role of local and federalgovernments and the military:adescription of economic activity in the privatesector (i.e., tour.isid, construction, manufacturingand trarde, agziculture and .fisheries and finan,cial inStitutionsi:and a discussion of onomic development in. Micronesia 'titsa whole.. Appendices contain them' 1979 uGuam Statistical Abstract which "Constitutesthe bulk Of tpe report and provides a wide lia.riety of data relevantto econ9mic development and planning.. Specific topics includedemography, vital statistics, school enrollment, local and federalgovernment finance, public utilities, transportation, tourism, andinternational trade. The most current"data are for fiscalyear 1977 or 197B with many tables showing figures for the previous 10years.(J11) A , . ***************t*********************************************t********* * .
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinarian Shortage Situation Nomination Form
    4IPSUBHF*% TX175 7.-3164&0/-: NIFAVeterinaryMedicine NationalInstituteofFoodandAgriculture LoanRepaymentProgram(VMLRP) USDepartmentofAgriculture FormNIFA2009Ͳ0001 OMBControlNo.0524ͲϬϬϱϬ VeterinarianShortageSituation ExpirationDate:ϵͬϯϬͬϮϬϭϵ NominationForm Tobesubmitted undertheauthorityofthechiefStateorInsularAreaAnimalHealthOfficial VeterinaryMedicineLoanRepaymentProgram(VMLRP) ThisformmustbeusedforNominationofVeterinarianShortageSituationstotheVeterinaryMedicineLoanRepaymentProgram (VMLRP),AuthorizedUndertheNationalVeterinaryMedicalServiceAct(NVMSA) Note:Pleasesubmitoneseparatenominationformforeachshortagesituation.SeetheStateAnimalHealthOfficial(SAHO)sectionof theVMLRPwebsite(www.nifa.usda.gov/vmlrp)forthenumberofnominationspermittedforyourstateorinsulararea. LocationofVeterinaryShortageAreaforthisNomination Coke, Crockett, Glasscock, Mitchell, Reagan, Sterling, Upton, TX LocationofVeterinaryShortage: (e.g.,County,State/InsularArea;mustbealogisticallyfeasibleveterinarypracticeservicearea) ApproximateCenterofShortageArea Sterling City, 76951 (orLocationofPositionifTypeIII): (e.g.,AddressorCrossStreet,Town/City,andZipCode) OverallPriorityofShortage: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@High Priority TypeofVeterinaryPracticeArea/Discipline/Specialty;ƐĞůĞĐƚŽŶĞͿ͗ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@Type II: Private Practice - Rural Area, Food Animal Medicine (awardee obligation: at least 30%@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ FTE or 12hr/week) &ŽƌdLJƉĞ/Žƌ//WƌŝǀĂƚĞWƌĂĐƚŝĐĞ͗ Musƚcover(checkĂtleastone) Maycover ■ BeefCattle BeefCattle DairyCattle DairyCattle
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E800 HON
    E800 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks August 28, 2020 Under Mark’s leadership, the laboratory as- the community to eliminate poverty and create Additionally, besides the changes being sembled the power source for the Mars 2020 social change through advocacy and essential made by new Postmaster General, the ongo- Perseverance Rover, continues to meet the services, envisioning a thriving, equitable and ing COVID–19 pandemic that has befuddled Army’s needs for tank armor, is helping DoD diverse community free from poverty and in- this Administration also poses a clear threat to explore the use of microreactors, and is pro- justice informed by the values of equity, dig- the short-term and long-term fiscal health of ducing new nuclear fuels and materials. nity and diversity, service, inclusion and com- the Postal Service. I am pleased that the bill A personal priority of mine has been revital- munity action. Specifically, Doug has served before us today includes needed funding to izing the lab’s infrastructure and putting INL’s as the Program Director of CAB’s Santa Cruz address mail volume declines to support the talented workforce into world-class facilities. County Immigration Project (SCCIP, promoting Postal Service and its workers through these Mark has been a great ally in this process, an the wellbeing of the immigrant community by trying times. innovator and collaborator. helping immigrants acquire legal status, reunit- We need to protect and maintain a strong He brought the Department of Energy and ing immigrant families, and making U.S. Citi- Postal Service which is what this bill does.
    [Show full text]
  • FY21 Tribal and Insular Area RFA Priority County List (April 2021)
    &EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality United States April 2021 Environmental Protection Agency FY21 Tribal and Insular Area RFA Priority County List In order to receive points under Section V, Criterion #2.B of this RFA, vehicles or equipment proposed for funding must be operated a majority of the time in one of the priority areas listed below. These areas were identified as priority locations for the DERA program because they are designated, as of the release date of this RFA, as Nonattainment Areas or Maintenance Areas for the following National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Data is sourced from EPA’s Green Book of Nonattainment Areas for Criteria (https://www.epa.gov/green- book). a) PM2.5 1997 Standard (Annual: 15 µg/m3, 24-hour: 65 µg/m3) b) PM2.5 2006 Standard (Annual: 15 µg/m3, 24-hour: 35 µg/m3) c) PM2.5 2012 Standard (Annual: 12 µg/m3, 24-hour: 35 µg/m3) d) Ozone (O3) 2008 Standard (8-hour: 0.075ppm) e) Ozone (O3) 2015 Standard (8-hour: 0.070ppm) 2015 8-Hour 2008 8-Hour State County 2012 PM 2.5 2006 PM 2.5 1997 PM 2.5 Ozone Ozone AK Fairbanks North Star Borough X AL Jackson County X AL Jefferson County X AL Shelby County X AL Walker County X AR Crittenden County X AZ Gila County X AZ Maricopa County X X AZ Pinal County X X X AZ Santa Cruz County X AZ Yuma County X CA Alameda County X X X CA Amador County X CA Butte County X X X CA Calaveras County X X CA Contra Costa County X X X CA El Dorado County X X X CA Fresno County X X X X X CA Imperial County X X X X CA Kern County X X X X X CA Kings County X X X X X CA Los Angeles
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.6 Marine Birds
    3.6 Marine Birds MARIANA ISLANDS TRAINING AND TESTING FINAL EIS/OEIS MAY 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.6 MARINE BIRDS .................................................................................................................... 3.6-1 3.6.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 3.6-1 3.6.1.1 Endangered Species Act ............................................................................................................. 3.6-2 3.6.1.2 Migratory Bird Treaty Act Species and 50 Code of Federal Regulations Part 21.15 Requirements ............................................................................................................................. 3.6-3 3.6.1.3 United States Fish and Wildlife Service Birds of Conservation Concern ................................... 3.6-4 3.6.1.4 Major Bird Groups...................................................................................................................... 3.6-4 3.6.1.5 Areas Included in the Analysis ................................................................................................... 3.6-6 3.6.2 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................ 3.6-7 3.6.2.1 Group Size .................................................................................................................................. 3.6-8 3.6.2.2 Diving ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Networks Enhance Inarajan Village's Sense of Place
    Networks Enhance Inarajan Village’s Sense of Place By Yuki Cruz, Master of Urban Planning 2013 ) ) Overview” provides a general The first chapter identifies synopsis of the island’s attributes that exist within the geographic, economic, and village. These attributes come demographic characteristics. from multiple sources including The second section “Tourism TripAdvisor, Guampedia, and on Guam” discusses the role of local opinion. tourism, the habits of tourists, Executive Summary and current efforts to strengthen The second chapter analyzes the tourism industry. The third the social network of the people section discusses the architec- involved in the Inarajan Historic tural and cultural significance Architectural District Revitaliza- of Inarajan Village. Finally, the tion Plan. The analysis uncovers fourth section provides a synop- trends and shortcoming within sis the Inarajan Historic Archi- the network. tectural Distric Revitalization This document studies how networks can be used to strengthen the Plan. Part 3: long-term social, cultural, and economic vitality of Guam’s Inarajan Conclusion and Village. The document is broken down into three main parts: Over- Part 2: Assessment Recommendations view, Assessment, and Conclusion. The Assessment addresses two This part addresses the Part 1: Overview topics: main findings of this project, suggested future steps, and The Overview is meant to familiarize the reader with the larger recommendations for Inarajan 1. Placemaking for Commu- systems in which Inarajan Village is located. These systems form to make it there. It expands on nity Identity and the environment in which decisions must be made. The influences the social network analysis of of the environment are often viewed relative to time, geography, Inarajan and examples how the 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Economic Impact Analysis of Proposed Critical Habitat for Three Endangered Species on Guam and Rota
    DRAFT ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITAT FOR THREE ENDANGERED SPECIES ON GUAM AND ROTA REVISED DETERMINATION NOVEMBER 2002 DRAFT ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITAT FOR THREE ENDANGERED SPECIES ON GUAM AND ROTA REVISED DETERMINATION Prepared for: Division of Economics U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 N. Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 Prepared by: Belt Collins Hawaii Ltd. 2153 North King Street, Suite 200 Honolulu, HI 96819 Under subcontract to: Industrial Economics, Incorporated 2067 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02140 Send comments on the economic analysis to: Field Supervisor Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122 P.O. Box 50088 Honolulu, HI 96850-0001 NOVEMBER 2002 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITAT FOR TABLE OF CONTENTS THREE ENDANGERED SPECIES ON GUAM AND ROTA Table of Contents FOREWORD PREFACE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 LISTED SPECIES AND PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITAT 1.1 THE LISTED SPECIES ................................................ 1-1 1.2 PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITAT AREAS................................ 1-3 1.2.1 Primary Constituent Elements ...................................... 1-3 1.2.2 Excluded Areas, Features, and Structures ............................. 1-7 1.2.3 Acreage ....................................................... 1-8 1.2.4 Location and Terrain ............................................. 1-8 1.2.5 Occupied and Unoccupied Areas .................................... 1-9 1.2.6 Land Ownership
    [Show full text]