DOCSLIB.ORG

Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Overview Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Overview 1 Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Scenarios 2019 Version Control VERSION AUTHOR DATE CHANGES 1.0 PMO 08/06/2019 First draft version 1.0 PMO 12/06/2019 Corrections by the members 2.0 PMO 30/07/2019 Final draft version 2.0 PMO 12/09/2019 GA Approval 2.0 PMO 26/09/2019 TAG/RAG Approval 2 Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Scenarios 2019 Table of Contents Version Control ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Mediterranean RFC Network Map with line categories ............................................................................................. 5 Power Supply characteristics ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Single/Double Track features ........................................................................................................................................ 6 1. General Information ............................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Publication and update .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.3. Processes and communication for international disruptions .................................................................... 8 1.4. General requirements ................................................................................................................................... 10 1.5. Definitions ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.5.1. Definitions of infrastructure parameters ........................................................................................... 10 1.5.2. Capacity indications .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.5.3. Usability indications .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.6. Structure of the document .......................................................................................................................... 12 1.7. Disclaimer/Limitation of Liability ................................................................................................................. 12 2. Re-routing overview ............................................................................................................................................. 13 2.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2. Re-routing options ........................................................................................................................................ 13 2.2.1. Western Part .......................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.1.1. Western Part specificities ............................................................................................................. 14 2.2.1.2. Re-routing overview ..................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.1.3. Re-routing scenarios..................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.2. Middle Part ............................................................................................................................................. 30 2.2.2.1. Middle Part specificities ................................................................................................................ 30 2.2.2.2. Re-routing overview ..................................................................................................................... 30 2.2.2.3. Re-routing scenarios..................................................................................................................... 35 2.2.3. Eastern Part ........................................................................................................................................... 43 2.2.3.1. Eastern Part specificities .............................................................................................................. 43 2.2.3.2. Re-routing Overview ..................................................................................................................... 44 2.2.3.3. Re-routing scenarios..................................................................................................................... 47 ANNEX ............................................................................................................................................................................ 61 Annex 1.1 Capacity ................................................................................................................................................. 62 3 Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Scenarios 2019 Annex 1.2 Traffic Management ............................................................................................................................. 66 Annex 2.1 Capacity ................................................................................................................................................. 70 Annex 2.2 Traffic Management ............................................................................................................................. 72 Annex 3.1 Capacity ................................................................................................................................................. 74 Annex 3.2 Traffic Management ............................................................................................................................. 80 4 Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Scenarios 2019 Mediterranean RFC Network Map with line categories Track Gauge features 5 Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Scenarios 2019 Power Supply characteristics Single/Double Track features 6 Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Scenarios 2019 1. General Information 1.1. Introduction Large incidents like Rastatt show that international measures must be implemented to be able to quickly organize traffic after a major interruption. In 2018 European Rail Infrastructure Managers (IMs) agreed on international processes for managing international disruptions due to unforeseen events, such as incidents, with the aim of minimising the negative impact on the railway system, which are the key elements of business continuity management, as measures to strengthen the resilience of the rail system and to rebuild customer confidence in rail. These processes are described in the “Handbook for International Contingency Management (ICM Handbook)” that was adopted under the umbrella of Rail Net Europe (RNE). The described processes in the ICM Handbook provides an international pre-defined re-routing overview and scenarios for sections of the Rail Freight Corridors (RFCs), with at least 2 aims: ▪ To help traffic management and timetabling units with the coordination of the deviation of freight trains in the plannable phase (as soon as possible after an incident) in case of disruptions ▪ To support the RUs in planning their contingency management, with the objective to increase possible use of deviation routes as soon as possible Our document includes scenarios with the possible re-routing options for all the involved sections for re- routing on RFC MED for the benefit of Railway Undertakings (RU) readiness to act properly in these cases. The deviation routes concerned, were defined with taking into account all the existing physical limitations along RFC MED: ▪ track gauge differences between the Iberian system (ADIF) and UIC gauge (SNCF Réseau) ▪ power supply differences (4 different systems together with un-electrified connections) ▪ single/double track lines, on Southern part of ADIF Network and on the Eastern part of our RFC (SŽ- I, HŽI, MÁV), hundreds of kilometres, even principal routes, of lines are single track either in a Member State or between/among Member States ▪ some lines are under construction and so are out of service at the moment ▪ in some cases, there are no re-routing options available, as there are no alternatives In this document the described re-routing scenarios in general are based on those lines, which are secondary lines with less advanced technical parameters comparing to the principal routes of our RFC. Finally, in case of deviation routes free capacity could be take into account, which means remaining after allocation from yearly timetable and ad hoc capacity (based on estimations of historical experiences. This document represents RFC MED understanding and implementation of the existing version of ICM Handbook. 7 Mediterranean RFC Re-Routing Scenarios 2019 1.2. Publication and update RFC MED will update this document and annexes on yearly basis, which will be published together with the Customer Information Document on the second Monday of January. This initial version could
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Turistična Naloga: ČUDEŽNE OGNJENE KROGLE
    OSNOVNA ŠOLA PREŽIHOVEGA VORANCA JESENICE Cesta Toneta Tomšiča 5, 4270 JESENICE Tel: 04 581 15 00 Fax: 04 586 31 74 E-naslov: [email protected] Turistična naloga: ČUDEŽNE OGNJENE KROGLE Avtorji: Kaja Magovac, 7.r Domen Lukan, 7.r Aljaž Lukan, 7.r Kris Horvat, 7.r Ajdin Mujić, 7.r Julijan Stojanović, 7.r Mentorica: Hermina Biščević, področna svetovalka II Jesenice, januar 2015 POVZETEK: Namen predlaganega turističnega produkta je turističnim ponudnikom in Občini Jesenice predstaviti, da bi lahko bila tudi zgodba o jeseniškem meteoritu za goste zanimiva in vredna ogleda. Ker zgodba še ni oblikovana kot celovit turistični produkt, bi lahko bil naš predlog programa dvodnevnega tabora idejna zasnova, pri oblikovanju predlogov za razvoj turizma na Jesenicah. Cilj naloge je oblikovati program aktivnosti v dvodnevnem izletu, ki vsebuje nastanitev v taboru, spoznavanje naravnih znamenitosti in kulturne dediščine našega kraja, pokušino tradicionalnih jedi, rekreacijo in umetniško ustvarjanje. V nalogi predstavljamo tudi načine trženja ponudbe od tiskanih medijev do digitalnih medijev, ki so za današnji čas velikega pomena. Za uspešno trženje in reklamiranje bo potrebno vključiti lokalne turistične delavce, občino in zasebne podjetnike, saj edino s skupnimi močmi lahko z zgodbo o jeseniškem meteoritu privabimo največ gostov. Ključne besede: Zgodba, turistični produkt, trženje ABSTRAKT: The purpose of tourism product is to present tourism providers and the municipality of Jesenice, that the story of Jesenice meteorite could be interesting for our tourist guests and worth a visit. Because our proposal of the story is not designed as an integrated tourist product, it could be conceptual design for the development of tourism in Jesenice.
    [Show full text]
  • Operativnim Program Odvajanja in Čiščenja Komunalnih Odpadnih Voda Za Občino Jesenice
    OB ČINA JESENICE Cesta železarjev 6 4270 Jesenice OPERATIVNI PROGRAM ODVAJANJA IN ČIŠ ČENJA KOMUNALNIH ODPADNIH VOD ZA OB ČINO JESENICE (za obdobje od 2011 do 2017 s poudarkom na ukrepih programa, ki bodo izvedeni do 31.decembra 2014) Operativni program odvajanja in čiš čenja odpadnih vod v Ob čini Jesenice Stran 1/28 VSEBINA: 1. UVOD.................................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Obrazložitev in umestitev vsebine operativnega programa........................... 3 1.2. Spremljanje in ocena izvajanja operativnega programa................................ 5 2. ANALIZA STANJA ............................................................................................. 5 2.1. Obmo čje ob čine ............................................................................................ 5 2.2. Pokritost obmo čja ob čine s kanalizacijo in čistilnimi napravami.................... 8 2.3. Podatki o katastru in drugih evidencah, ki pokrivajo podro čja odvajanja in čiš čenja odpadnih vod................................................................................. 13 2.4. Organiziranost javne službe........................................................................ 13 2.5. Predpisi ob čine............................................................................................ 14 2.6. Cenovna politika na podro čju odvajanja in čiš čenja komunalnih odpadnih in padavinskih vod .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KS PLANINA POD GOLICO 1. Planina Pod Golico, Osrednji Spomenik
    KS PLANINA POD GOLICO 1. Planina pod Golico, osrednji spomenik NOB 2. Planina pod Golico, pokopališče, grob borca Guzelj Franca 3. Planina pod Golico, pokopališče, grob aktivista OF Klinar Franca 4. Planina pod Golico, pokopališče, grob kurirja Klinar Valentina 5. Planina pod Golico, pokopališče, grob borca Pregelj Viktorja 6. Planina pod Golico, pokopališče, grob kurirja Razinger Jožeta 7. Planina pod Golico, pokopališče, grob Seršen Ivana 8. Planina pod Golico, pokopališče, grob Stare Štefana 9. Planina pod Golico, pokopališče, grob kurirja Starman Tonete 10. Planina pod Golico, pokopališče, grob Štumpfel Antona 11. Planina pod Golico, nasproti hiše št. 37, sp. plošča padlim borcem (pri Sodju) 12. Planina pod Golico, Bašar pod Golico, sp. obeležje kurirjema Valentinu Čudnu in Jožetu Razingerju 13. Planina pod Golico, Kramparica, sp . plošča padlim kurirjem 14. Planina pod Golico, Sušje pod Črnim vrhom, sp. plošča Pavlu Gmajnarju in Marjanu Ruparju 15. Planina pod Golico, Suho sedlo pod Golico, sp. plošča Ivanu Čeru 16. Plavški rovt, pri Zakošiču, grob borca Grobotek Franca 17. Plavški rovt, pri Zakošiču, sp. obeležje padlim borcem PLANINA POD GOLICO: nasproti hotela "Belcijan" Osrednji spomenik padlim borcem, talcem in žrtvam fašističnega nasilja Napis: KOT ŽRTVE STE PADLI V BORBI ZA NAS 1941 - 1945 BRANC FILIP RAZINGER JOŽE - PETER KELVIŠAR VIKTOR - MIŠKO RAZINGER JOŽE - RUDI KLINAR FRANC - PRIMOŽEV RAZINGEH IGNAC KLINAR JAKOB - GUSTELJ ROBIČ SLAVKO - LUDVIK KLINAR MIHA SRŠEN IVAN NOČ FRANC STARMAN ANTON - BRANKO STARE ŠTEFAN - MARTIN NOČ PAVEL - PETER STUMPFEL AN'I10N - ANTE SLAVA VAM! Krajevna skupnost: Planina pod Golico Krajevna organizacija ZB NOV: Planina pod Golico Pobudnik postavitve: KO ZB NOV Planina pod Golico Avtor osnutka: ing.Hafner Pavel Izvajalec:"'Marmor"Ljubljana Datum odkritja: 1954 Material: klesani kamen, marmor, železo v stebra: 3m v zidu oz.skale i z klesanih kamnov: 163 cm š -"- 450 cm (spodaj) d -"- ?o cm v plo š če: 58 cm š p loš č e: 133 cm v črk: 3; 4 cm k .
    [Show full text]
  • Costs and Demand of High Speed Rail in Italy and Spain
    World Conference on Transport Research - WCTR 2016 Shanghai. 10-15 July 2016 Delusions of success: costs and demand of high speed rail in Italy and Spain Paolo Beria1a, Daniel Albalateb, Raffaele Grimaldia, Germà Belb a Department of Architecture and Urban Studies (DAStU), Politecnico di Milano, Italy b Dep. Política Econòmica, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain Abstract Mismatches between forecasted and actual costs and traffic figures are common in transport investments, especially in large scale ones, and so are delusions on future demand. High-speed rail project are often among the worst practices for cost overruns and demand overestimation, even where traffic figures may tell a history of apparent success. In the paper, we analyse two significant cases of delusion of success, namely Italian and Spanish HSR programmes. The Italian one shows excellent demand performances, but is among the continental worst cases for construction costs. The Spanish one, recognised worldwide as one of the most successful cases, is the one where potential demand estimations was systematically neglected and the planned network appears largely out-of-scale compared to actual traffic. The two cases show that the core of the problem does not lay in the wrong estimations of costs and demand, but on deliberate choices of overinvestment, overdesign and overquality. © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Peer-review under responsibility of WORLD CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORT RESEARCH SOCIETY. Keywords: High-speed rail, megaprojects, Italy, Spain, cost overrun, demand estimation, optimism bias 1 Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-02-2399-5424; fax: +39-02-2399-5435. E-mail address: [email protected] © 2017 The Authors 2 Beria, Albalate, Grimaldi, Bel / Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2017) 000–000 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorit Z Mežakle the Meteorite from Mt Mežakla
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Scopolia, Journal of the Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Ljubljana Jahr/Year: 2013 Band/Volume: Suppl_6 Autor(en)/Author(s): Jersek Miha Artikel/Article: The Meteorite from Mt Mezakla 51-54 Miha JERŠEK: Meteorit z Mežakle / The Meteorite from Mt Mežakla Meteorit z Mežakle The Meteorite from Mt Mežakla Miha JERŠEK1 Izvleček Na Mežaklo je 9. aprila 2009 padel meteorit; bil je viden, slišan in posnet. Prvi kos so našli dober mesec pozneje. Pripada kamnitim meteoritom hondritom in je šele enajsti meteorit z natančno ugotovljeno orbito. Poimenovan je po najbližjem mestu padca: Jesenice. Ključne besede: meteorit Jesenice, meteoriti, Jesenice, Gorje Abstract On April 9th 2009, a meteorite fell on Mt Mežakla (Slovenia), which was actually seen, heard and recorded. Its first piece was recovered a month later. It belongs to stone meteorites, known as chondrites, and is only the 11th meteorite with accurately determined orbit. It has been named after the nearest town to its impact: Jesenice. Key words: Jesenice meteorite, meteorites, Jesenice, Gorje Dne 9. aprila 2009, nekaj sekund pred trejo uro zjutraj, so nekateri prebivalci avstrijske Koroške in Gornjesavske doline zaslišali strašljivo bobnenje. Gasilci, ki so ob tej uri dežurali zaradi požara nad Pejcami, so videli zelo svetel in nekoliko neobičajno dolg utrinek, ki se je nato izgubil nad Mežaklo v smeri Blejske Dobrave. Astronomske meteorske in vsenebne kamere so ta nebesni pojav zaznale kot zelo svetel objekt in astronomi so takoj vedeli, da gre za padec meteorita. Slovenski in češki astronomi so intenzivno izračunavali polje padca.
    [Show full text]
  • (933 M) Presso Jesenice, Per Il Rifugio Koca Na Golici (1582 M) Direttori Di Escursione: Alberto Vecchiet E Gianni Tiberio
    Domenica 18 maggio 2014 I narcisi del Monte Golica (1835 m) (slo) da Planina pod Golico (933 m) presso Jesenice, per il rifugio Koca na Golici (1582 m) Direttori di escursione: Alberto Vecchiet e Gianni Tiberio La Golica è una bella e vasta montagna collocata nella catena TABELLA DEI TEMPI occidentale delle Karavanke, sopra Ore 6.45 partenza da Piazza Oberdan, all’alta valle della Sava. Si innalza a breve sosta durante il viaggio ovest dello Stol e assieme a questo “ 9.30 arrivo a Jesenice troneggia sulla periferia della città industriale di Jesenice. La parte “ 10.00 a Planina pod Golico (933m), partenza appena pronti meridionale è tipica delle Karavanke. Il bosco si spinge fino a circa 1500 metri e “ 12.00 al rifugio ko ča na Golici (1582m) da qui in poi, con una netta “ 13.00 in vetta al monte Golica (m. 1835), sosta demarcazione, iniziano i vasti ed erbosi e pranzo dal sacco; pendii che portano fino alla cima; pendii “ 13.30 iInizio discesa verso la sella Jekljevo che non sono mai interrotti da alcuna sedlo; “ 15.00 ritorno al rifugio Koca na Golici (breve roccia o cespuglio. Da qui il suo nome, sosta); Golica ovvero Gola gora, montagna 17.00 a Planina pod Golico e partenza appena nuda. A metà altezza, i suoi versanti pronti. sono strutturati in modo tale da formare “ 20.00 circa, arrivo a Trieste una conca dove si trovano le case sparse del paese di Planina pod Golico. Si raccomanda di munirsi di documento Per il suo comodo accesso e per il valido per l’espatrio, la tessera CAI e la suo incantevole panorama sulle alpi tessera sanitaria internazionale Giulie, sfavillanti al di là della valle, la Golica è il monte più frequentato di tutte le Karavanke.
    [Show full text]
  • Katalog Elektrode
    TRADITION Our history and tradition goes back to the year 1939, since that time at Jesenice location welding material is developed and produced. Now about 200 experienced employees care for QUALITY Our philosophy is the customer satisfaction and production of high quality products, so we in 1997 got quality management system approval ISO 9001. Our production facilities are continuously checked and approved by Internacional Supervisory Institutions TÜV, DB and many Classification societies: GL, BV, ABS, LR, RS, DNV, RINA, PRS, SZU, CR and SŽ. All metallic and mineral materials for the production of Elektrode Jesenice products are under strict control and all welding materials produced in our company are tested. Manufacturing certificates are available on request. SERVICE Today we supply to more than 200 constant customers from 10 countries. Long experiences enables Electrode to offer you a comprehensive know-how about of welding. CONTENTS PRODUCT PROGRAMME ………………………………………….…..…… I CLASSIFICATION BY NORMS ALPHABETICAL LIST OF WELDING CONSUMABLES …….…….…… II WELDING CONSUMABLES …………………………………………….…. III TECHNICAL INFORMATIONS …………………………………………….. IV PRODUCT PROGRAMME PRODUCT EN ISO AWS Page 2560-A 2560-B A-5.1 / A-5.5* Low alloyed cellulosic, rutile and acid electrodes NEUTRAL E 35 AA 13 E 43 40 A / A1 RAPID E 38 2 R A 13 E 43 20 A E 6020 A2 CELEX E 35 2 C 21 ~E 43 10 A E 6010 A3 CELEX Mn E 42 3 C 21 ~E 49 10 A E 7010-G A4 CELEX Mo E 42 3 Mo C 21 ~E 49 10 A E 7010-A1* A5 CELEX Ni E 46 3 1NiC 21 ~E 55 10-N1 A E 8010-G * A6 CELEX NiMo E 50 3
    [Show full text]
  • Myopic Ppps: Risk Allocation and Hidden Liabilities for Taxpayers and Users
    Utilities Policy 48 (2017) 147e156 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Utilities Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jup Myopic PPPs: Risk allocation and hidden liabilities for taxpayers and users * Germa Bel , Paula Bel-Pinana,~ Jordi Rosell GiM-IREA and Universitat de Barcelona, Dep. of Econometrics, Statistics and Applied Economics, Facultat d’Economia i Empresa, John Keynes 1e11, 0034 Barcelona, Spain article info abstract Article history: Drawing on evidence from three case studies, we show how the State's Financial Liability has worked in Received 30 January 2017 assigning risk in large PPP contracts in Spain. Project failure and the concessionaires' bankruptcy have Received in revised form resulted in the government having to assume heavy financial obligations, which have ultimately been 22 April 2017 absorbed by taxpayers and users. In contrast, Spain's leading construction companies, which were also Accepted 8 June 2017 major investors in the concessionaires, have been able to minimize their risk. Myopic PPPs have been Available online 29 July 2017 entered into based on the transference of liabilities to taxpayers and users, and the, consequent, mini- mization of risks for the main private investors. Keywords: © Public-private partnerships 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Concessions Infrastructure projects Transportation Energy 1. Introduction sharing - between the taxpayer and the private partner - and bundling can be considered the two distinctive features of PPPs A public-private partnership e PPP e is a long-term contract1 (Iossa and Martimort, 2015). between public and private parties, the aim of which is to deliver One of the advantages stressed in the economics literature (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Freight Corridor 6 Implementation Plan Tt 2015
    Rail Freight Corridor 6 Implementation– Plan 2016 RAIL FREIGHT CORRIDOR 6 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TT 2015/2016 1 Rail Freight Corridor 6 Implementation– Plan 2016 MODIFICATIONS AND UPDATINGS Evolution Index Date Modification / comments Written by RFF/Task V0 2 April 2013 First version / Gathering of each chapter Force RFF/Task V1 9 April 2013 Update of chapter 1, 3 and 5 Force RFF/Task V2 12 April 2013 Update following / MB Decision Force VTAGRAG 17 April 2013 Update following / TF level Task Force EB version 10 May 2013 AG Comments / MB approval Task Force AG / Executive Board / European Commission Comments V10Nov 2013 6 November 2013 PMO CIDs and Basic elements of TMS V9Dec 2013 9 December 2013 Executive Board Comments for Approval PMO V16Jan 2014 16 January 2014 ERTMS Update PMO V20Mar 2014 20 March 2014 Terminals list and maps update PMO V18Dec 2014 18 December 2014 Extension of the Corridor and general updates PMO V9Jan2015 19 January 2015 Executive Boards Comments PMO V11May2015 11 May 2015 RFF – SNCF Réseau update PMO 2 Rail Freight Corridor 6 Implementation– Plan 2016 Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 2 Characteristics of RFC 6 and governance ........................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Rail Freight Corridor 6 characteristics ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ks Javornik - Koroška Bela
    KS JAVORNIK - KOROŠKA BELA 1. Javornik, Cesta Borisa Kidriča, osrednji spomenik NOB 2. Javornik, Cesta Borisa Kidriča 10, sp. plošča ne hiši, kjer je deloval l. 1941 jeseniški okrožni komite KPS 3. Javornik, Cesta Borisa Kidriče št. 20, sp. plošča Julki in Albinu Pibernik 4. Javornik, Cesta Janeza Finžgarja 3, sp. plošča prvoborcu Grintov Cirilu 5. Javornik, Ceste Slavka Likoviča, sp. obeležje Slavku Likoviču 6. Javornik, Dobravska ulica št. 2, sp. plošča Oblak Dolfetu in materi Ivani 7. Javornik, Pionirska ulica št. 4, sp. plošče prvoborcu Ludviku Benedičiču 8. Javornik, Pot Otmarje Novaka 7, sp. obeležje borcu VDV Otmarju Novaku 9. Javornik, Savske cesta 12, sp. plošča aktivistki OF Mari Kelih 10. Javornik, Ulica prvoborca št. 1, sp. plošča prvoborcu Kralj Ignacu 11. Javorniški rovt, pod domom ne Pristavi, spomenik padlim borcem 12. Javorniški rovt, ob hiši št. 4a, grob sekretarja OK SKOJ Zupan Jožeta - Ježka 13. Javorniški rovt, št. 10, sp. plošča borcu Evgenu Bizjaku 14. Javorniški rovt, št. 30, grob kurirja Žvab Jožefa 15. Javorniški rovt, ob cesti, sp. plošča borki Ivanki Krničar 16. Javorniški rovt, ob cesti, sp. plošča borcu Tonetu Stumpflu 17. Javorniški rovt, Medji dol, sp. plošča padlim borcem 18. Javorniški rovt, za Mavram, obnovljena kurirska postaja G-22 19. Koroška Bela, spominski park, spomenik na grobišču petih talcev 20. Koroška Bela, spominski park, grobišče borcev, talcev in žfn 21. Koroška Bele, Cesta talcev št. 1, sp. plošča aktivistu OF Svetina Viktorju 22. Koroška Bela, Cesta talcev št. 2, osn. šola, sp. plošča padlim borcem NOV - nekdanjim učencem šole 23. Koroška Bela, Cesta talcev št.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Premises Jesenice
    INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY: BUSINESS PREMISES JESENICE - CENTER WHY SLOVENIA? Foreign direct investment (FDI) is equally important to Slovenia’s economic growth as it is for global GDP and jobs worldwide. The Slovenian government has been working on improving the environment to attract quality business to the country and, in turn, create new jobs. For Slovenia as an FDI location quality has always been its core value and its cutting edge. Attention to quality runs in the blood of its people and in combination with vocational and university education makes the country’s workforce often No. 1 reason to invest in Slovenia. Discover Slovenia’s investment opportunities, visit www.investslovenia.org. 3 Copenhagen Warsaw Berlin Amsterdam Baltic -Adriatic London TEN-T Corridor Brussels Prague Frankfurt Bratislava Munich Vienna Paris Budapest Bucharest Ljubljana Bern Zagreb Venice Beograd Milan Mediteranean Sarajevo TEN-T corridor 250 km Sofia Podgorica Skopje Rome Tirana 500 km Barcelona 1000 km 4 / 5 EXPO REAL, Munich Copenhagen Warsaw • GDP growth in 2018: 4.5 % Berlin (4th highest in EU-28) Amsterdam Baltic -Adriatic London FACTS ABOUT SLOVENIA TEN-T Corridor One of the fastest growing CEE countries • Estimated GDP growth for 2019: 3.4 % Brussels Prague Frankfurt • Long-term GDP growth: 2.2 % Bratislava • 25th most developed country Munich Vienna Paris Budapest (Human Development Index 2018, UN) Bucharest Ljubljana th Bern Zagreb • 15 place on Quality of Life Venice Beograd Index 2019 (Numbeo) Milan • 11th safest country (Global Mediteranean Sarajevo TEN-T corridor 250 km Sofia Peace Index 2018) Podgorica Skopje • 2nd most secure energy system in the world Rome Tirana 500 km • Well-developed ICT Barcelona infrastructure • Strong healthcare system 1000 km 5 Promoter BUSINESS PREMISES JESENICE - K3 Kern d.o.o.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary on the Ability of the Municipality of Jesenice to Use European Union Funds
    Summary on the ability of the Municipality of Jesenice to use European Union funds The Court of Audit audited the ability of the Municipality of Jesenice to acquire and utilise funds of the Cohesion Fund for co-financing environmental projects and funds of the European Regional Development Fund for co-financing construction of business zones. The audit reviewed the activities and achievements of the municipality in acquisition and utilisation of the mentioned EU funds from the implementation of Single Programming Documents of the Republic of Slovenia in 2003 1 until the end of 2005. The purpose of the audit was to assess the effectiveness of the municipality to acquire and utilise the EU funds and to assess the appropriateness of establishing conditions for successful acquisition and utilisation of the EU funds. Municipality of Jesenice was not identified as an area for implementation of projects in the field of environment, which could have been co-financed by the funds of the Cohesion Fund. Municipality of Jesenice applied to acquire funds of the European Regional Development Fund to co- finance two projects for the construction of business zones. The Municipality of Jesenice was unsuccessful twice with the application of the project Jesenice Business Zone – Stage 2 to the tender for the funds of the European Regional Development Fund. However, it was successful in the application to the tender for the funds of the European Regional Development Fund to co-finance the project Jesenice Business Zone - Ob Savi Area and acquired 75 percent of eligible costs or EUR 850 thousand. In the implementation of the project Jesenice Business Zone – Ob Savi Area , the Municipality of Jesenice was successful to include additional works among the eligible costs with timely conclusion and submission of the annex to the contract.
    [Show full text]