Logistics Handbook NATO ISBN 978-92-845-0190-8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Logistics Handbook NATO ISBN 978-92-845-0190-8 Logistics Handbook NATO ISBN 978-92-845-0190-8 NATO Logistics NATO Public Diplomacy Division B-1110 Brussels Handbook www.nato.int November 2012 [email protected] Graphics & Printing 1533-12 NATO FOREWORD The NATO Logistics Handbook is published under the auspices of the Logistics Committee (LC) and aims to introduce logisticians at every level to some of NATO’s basic principles, policies, concepts and the organisations which they will encounter in the course of their work. NATO and the security environment in which it operates are continually changing. An obvious indicator of transformation in NATO logistics since the 2007 version of the Handbook, is the change of name of the Senior NATO Logisticians’ Conference (SNLC) to LC. We have a new NATO Strategic Concept which has guided the updating of the logistics vision, strategic goals and objectives. Furthermore, NATO logistics continues its migration to collective logistics. It is incumbent on all logisticians to ensure that the logistic support concepts that are required to ensure the deployability and sustainability of NATO forces change to meet political and other guidance and, most importantly, operational needs. The current principles, policies and concepts have been reflected in this edition of the Handbook, but its continuing usefulness will depend on the ongoing process of keeping it updated and readers should ensure that they use the latest version of the references quoted herein. This Handbook is not a formally agreed document, and should not be quoted as a reference. It does not necessarily represent the official opinion or position of NATO, the nations, Commands or agencies on all the policy issues discussed, nor does it attempt to examine current issues or provide answers to the problems that logisticians will face in the field - these will change over time and circumstance. If any readers have suggestions for improvements or amendments to the Handbook, they are asked to forward them to the LC Secretariat. LC Secretariat International Staff Logistics Capabilities Section Defence Policy and Planning Division NATO HQ 1110 Brussels BELGIUM —i— TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 THE ALLIANCE’S NEW STRATEGIC CONCEPT, OVERARCHING POLICIES AND STRUCTURES INTRODUCTION . .3 Decision-making in NATO ...................................................3 THE ALLIANCE’S STRATEGIC CONCEPT . .3 POLITICAL GUIDANCE . 4. COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH . .5 STABILISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION . 5 NATO POLITICAL/MILITARY STRUCTURE . 6 North Atlantic Council (NAC) ...............................................6 Deputy Permanent Representatives’ Committee (DPRC) ...............6 Defence Policy and Planning Committee (DPPC) ........................6 Operations Policy Committee (OPC) ......................................7 Military Committee (MC) ....................................................7 Political and Partnerships Committee (PPC) ..............................7 Civil Emergency Planning Committee (CEPC) ............................8 Logistics Committee (LC) ...................................................8 NATO-Russia Council (NRC) ...............................................8 NATO-Ukraine Commission (NUC) ........................................9 NATO-Georgia Commission (NGC) ........................................9 THE NATO HEADQUARTERS STAFF STRUCTURE . .9 Secretary General (SG) .....................................................9 International Staff (IS) ..................................................... 10 International Military Staff (IMS) .......................................... 10 NATO’S MILITARY COMMAND STRUCTURE . 10 NATO Command Structure (NCS) . 10 NATO Force Structure (NFS) ..............................................11 Graduated Readiness Forces (GRF) .....................................11 NATO Response Force (NRF) . 12 ORGANISATIONS AND AGENCIES . 12 The NATO Support Organisation (NSPO) ............................... 13 The NATO Procurement Organisation (NPO) ........................... 13 —I— The NATO Communications and Information Organisation (NCIO).... 13 The NATO Shared Services Environment (NSSE) ...................... 14 The NATO Science and Technology Organisation (NSTO) ............. 14 The NATO Standardization Agency (NSA)............................... 14 REFERENCES . 15 CHAPTER 2 FUNDAMENTALS OF NATO LOGISTICS INTRODUCTION . 19 DEFINITIONS . 20 LOGISTIC FUNCTIONS . 22 Supply ...................................................................... 23 Materiel . 23 Services .................................................................... 23 Logistic Information Management ........................................ 23 Equipment Maintenance and Repair ..................................... 23 Movement and Transportation (M&T) .................................... 24 Reception, Staging and Onward Movement (RSOM) ................... 24 Infrastructure Engineering for Logistics (IEL) ............................ 24 Medical Support ........................................................... 24 Contractor Support ........................................................ 25 Host Nation Support (HNS) ............................................... 25 RELATED FUNCTIONS . 25 Civil-Military Cooperation (CIMIC) ........................................ 25 NATO Standardization and Interoperability ............................. 25 Environmental Protection.................................................. 25 Petroleum Logistics ........................................................ 26 Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) .................................... 26 NATO LOGISTICS WEBSITE . 26 REFERENCES . 26 ANNEX to Chapter 2 . 27 Classes of Supply.......................................................... 27 CHAPTER 3 NATO’S ORGANISATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR LOGISTICS INTRODUCTION . 31 —II— NATO LOGISTICS VISION AND OBJECTIVES (V&O) . 31 Introduction ................................................................. 31 Strategic Goals and Objectives ........................................... 32 The NATO Logistics V&O Process ....................................... 33 V&O Reporting ............................................................. 34 NATO LOGISTIC COMMITTEES . 34 The Logistics Committee (LC) . 34 Committee of the Chiefs of Military Medical Services in NATO (COMEDS) ................................................................. 37 NATO-Russia Council Ad Hoc Working Group on Logistics (NRC(LOG)) ................................................................ 37 OTHER NATO LOGISTIC BODIES . 38 Bi-SC Logistic Coordination Board (Bi-SC LCB) ........................ 38 Bi-SC SPC ................................................................. 38 Bi-SC LPAC ................................................................ 38 Bi-SC LOGFS IM WG ..................................................... 39 Bi-SC Movement and Transportation Forum (Bi-SC M&T Forum) . 39 Medical Groups ............................................................ 40 Bi-SC Medical Advisory Group (Bi-SC MEDAG) ........................ 41 Bi-SC NATO Senior Joint Engineering Conference (Bi-SC NSJEC) ... 41 RELATIONSHIPS . 41 European Union (EU)...................................................... 41 United Nations (UN) ....................................................... 42 Euro-Atlantic Disaster Relief Coordination Centre (EADRCC) ......... 42 REFERENCES: . 42 ANNEX to Chapter 3 . 43 COMEDS Expert Panels and Teams ..................................... 43 CHAPTER 4 NATO LOGISTIC PRINCIPLES, POLICIES AND DOCTRINE INTRODUCTION . 47 HIERARCHY OF LOGISTIC POLICIES AND DOCTRINE . 47 NATO PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES FOR COLLECTIVE LOGISTICS . 50 LOGISTIC PRINCIPLES . 50 LOGISTIC POLICIES . 51 General ..................................................................... 51 Responsibility . 51 —III— Authority . 52 Logistic Planning in Defence Planning . 53 Operations Logistics Planning ............................................ 53 Logistic Command and Control (C2) ..................................... 54 Logistic Readiness and Sustainability .................................... 54 Cooperation in Logistics ................................................... 54 Redistribution of Logistic Resources ..................................... 55 Multinational Collective Logistics ......................................... 55 Funding/Resources Provision............................................. 56 Civil Resources ............................................................ 56 Life Cycle Support . 56 LOGISTIC ASPECTS OF COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH AND STABILISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION . 57 REFERENCES . 57 CHAPTER 5 DETERMINATION OF LOGISTIC REQUIREMENTS INTRODUCTION . 61 NATO DEFENCE PLANNING PROCESS (NDPP) . 61 MANAGEMENT OF LOGISTIC INFORMATION . 64 Regulatory Framework for the Logistic Information System Architecture (LOGIS) ...................................................... 64 LOGISTICS READINESS AND SUSTAINABILITY . 65 NATO STOCKPILE PLANNING . 65 STANDARDIZATION AND INTEROPERABILITY . 65 REFERENCES . 66 CHAPTER 6 OPERATIONS LOGISTIC PLANNING INTRODUCTION . 69 KEY PLANNING DOCUMENTS . 70 LOGISTIC SUPPORT GUIDELINES . 71 LOGISTIC PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS . 71 Multinational Logistics ..................................................... 71 Joint Logistic Support Group HQ (JLSG HQ) ............................ 71 —IV— Movement Planning........................................................ 72 Medical Planning........................................................... 72 Supply and Maintenance Planning ......................................
Recommended publications
  • Capabilities in Systems Engineering: an Overview
    Capabilities in Systems Engineering: An Overview Gon¸caloAntunes and Jos´eBorbinha INESC-ID, Rua Alves Redol, 9 1000-029 Lisboa Portugal {goncalo.antunes,jlb}@ist.utl.pt, WWW home page: http://web.ist.utl.pt/goncalo.antunes Abstract. The concept of capability has been deemed relevant over the years, which can be attested by its adoption in varied domains. It is an abstract concept, but simple to understand by business stakeholders and yet capable of making the bridge to technical aspects. Capabilities seem to bear similarities with services, namely their low coupling and high cohesion. However, the concepts are different since the concept of service seems to rest between that of capability and those directly related to the implementation. Nonetheless, the articulation of the concept of ca- pability with the concept of service can be used to promote business/IT alignment, since both concepts can be used to bridge different concep- tual layers of an enterprise architecture. This work offers an overview of the different uses of this concept, its usefulness, and its relation to the concept of service. Key words: capability, service, alignment, information systems, sys- tems engineering, strategic management, economics 1 Introduction The concept of capability can be defined as \the quality or state of being capable" [19] or \the power or ability to do something" [39]. Although simple, it is a powerful concept, as it can be used to provide an abstract, high-level view of a product, system, or even organizations, offering new ways of dealing with complexity. As such, it has been widely adopted in many areas.
    [Show full text]
  • PVB Weekly Market View the Fed a Dovish Or a Hawkish Cut 25 October
    Macro Strategy | 25 October 2019 Weekly Market View 1 A Fed rate cut next week, with a dovish tone, is likely to further boost risk appetite, in our view Equities: US Q3 earnings from the financial and technology sectors have beaten forecasts, supporting our bullish view on US equities Bonds: Any decline in Treasury yields after the Fed meeting may be used to add EM USD exposure; EM local currency bonds look attractive The Fed – a dovish or a hawkish cut? FX: GBP, AUD, CAD look attractive as the USD peaks This commentary reflects the views of the Wealth Management Group of Standard Chartered Bank. Important disclosures can be found 1 in the Disclosures Appendix. Standard Chartered Bank weekly market view | 25 October 2019 Contents The Fed – a dovish or a hawkish cut? 1 What does this mean for investors? 4 What are the best opportunities if the USD is peaking? 5 Market performance summary 6 Economic and market calendar 7 Disclosures 8 Chart of the week: Markets pricing in a Fed cut on 31 October Probability of a 25bps Fed rate cut at the 31 October policy meeting based on money market pricing 95 80 65 50 Probability (%) Probability 35 20 Jul-19 Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19 October Fed meeting - probability of a cut Source: Bloomberg, Standard Chartered Editorial The Fed – a dovish or a hawkish cut? Global equity markets and commodities extended their rally over the past week amid further signs of progress in US-China trade As the risk rally extends with further signs of progress in US- talks China trade talks, the focus turns towards the Fed meeting on Benchmark market performance w/w* 31 October.
    [Show full text]
  • JAPCC Annual Report 2019
    2019 annual REPORT Joint Air Power Competence Centre Joint Air Power www.japcc.org Competence Centre Cover picture: Satellite: © ESA /AOES Medialab; Earth: © 2012 EUMETSAT; Background: © StarLine /shutterstock © This work is copyrighted. All Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This publication is a product of the JAPCC. It does not represent the opinions or policies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and is designed to provide an independent overview, analysis, food for thought and recommendations regarding a possible way ahead on the subject. Release This document is releasable to the Public. Portions of the document may be quoted without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. Published and distributed by The Joint Air Power Competence Centre von­Seydlitz­Kaserne Römerstraße 140 47546 Kalkar Germany Telephone: +49 (0) 2824 90 2201 Facsimile: +49 (0) 2824 90 2208 E­Mail: [email protected] Website: www.japcc.org Denotes images digitally manipulated Follow us on Social Media JAPCC | annual REPORT 2019 1 foreword Today, NATO Air Forces stand on the verge of the at the peer­to­peer level. We must use the lessons most meaningful transformation of technology and learned from this and other exercises to evolve our capability in our history, a transformation which con­ Alliance into a connected, Joint All Domain fighting tinues to be enabled in part by the independent force that is agile and capable of acting at speed that thought and analysis from the recognized air and future conflicts will require. I have great confidence space power experts in the Joint Air Power Compe­ that our Nations and our people will work closely with tence Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LOGISTICS of the FIRST CRUSADE 1095-1099 a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Wester
    FEEDING VICTORY: THE LOGISTICS OF THE FIRST CRUSADE 1095-1099 A Thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Western Carolina University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History By William Donald O’Dell, Jr. Director: Dr. Vicki Szabo Associate Professor of Ancient and Medieval History History Department Committee Members: Dr. David Dorondo, History Dr. Robert Ferguson, History October, 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members and director for their assistance and encouragements. In particular, Dr. Vicki Szabo, without whose guidance and feedback this thesis would not exist, Dr. David Dorondo, whose guidance on the roles of logistics in cavalry warfare have helped shaped this thesis’ handling of such considerations and Dr. Robert Ferguson whose advice and recommendations for environmental historiography helped shaped my understanding on how such considerations influence every aspect of history, especially military logistics. I also offer my warmest regards and thanks to my parents, brothers, and extended family for their continued support. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iv Abstract ............................................................................................................................................v Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • International Military Staff, Is to Provide the Best Possible C3 Staff Executive Operations, Strategic Military Advice and Staff Support for the Military Committee
    Director General of IMS Public Affairs & Financial Controller StratCom Executive Coordinator Advisor Legal Office HR Office NATO Office Support Activities on Gender Perspectives SITCEN Cooperation NATO Intelligence Operations Plans & Policy & Regional Logistics Headquarters Security & Resources C3 Staff Intelligence Major Operation Strategic Policy Partnership Concepts Logistics Branch Executive Production Branch Alpha & Concepts & Policy Branch Coordination Office Branch Intelligence Policy Joint Operations Nuclear Special Partnerships Medical Branch Information Services Branch & Plans Branch & CBRN Defence Branch Branch Education Training Defence and Regional Partnerships Plans, Policy & Exercise & Evaluation Force Planning Armaments Branch Branch Branch Architecture Branch Air & Missile Infrastructure & Spectrum & C3 Defence Branch Finance Branch Infrastructure Branch Operations, Manpower Branch Requirements, & Plans Branch NATO Defence Information Assurance Consists of military/civilian staff from member nations. Manpower & Cyber Defence Personnel work in international capacity for the common interest of the Alliance. Audit Authority Branch www.nato.int/ims e-mail :[email protected] Brussels–Belgium 1110 HQ, NATO Office,InternationalMilitaryStaff, Affairs the Public For moreinformationcontact: NATO HQ. NATO and the moveto thenew NATO are adaptedtoreflect Future ‘ways ofworking’ changes are not it likely, will be important that the IMS is reconfigured and its a review of the IMS Summit, Chicago the was at direction initiated. Government and State While of Heads major the Following structural and organizational respected andthatistotallyfreefromdiscriminationprejudice. is individual each which in environment an in communication open and initiative resilience, for need the and learning continuous promote also They commitment. first, Mission always.’ Our peopleThe workIMS with professionalism,team integrityembraces and the principles and values enshrined Values in ‘People decisiveness andpride.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quandary of Allied Logistics from D-Day to the Rhine
    THE QUANDARY OF ALLIED LOGISTICS FROM D-DAY TO THE RHINE By Parker Andrew Roberson November, 2018 Director: Dr. Wade G. Dudley Program in American History, Department of History This thesis analyzes the Allied campaign in Europe from the D-Day landings to the crossing of the Rhine to argue that, had American and British forces given the port of Antwerp priority over Operation Market Garden, the war may have ended sooner. This study analyzes the logistical system and the strategic decisions of the Allied forces in order to explore the possibility of a shortened European campaign. Three overall ideas are covered: logistics and the broad-front strategy, the importance of ports to military campaigns, and the consequences of the decisions of the Allied commanders at Antwerp. The analysis of these points will enforce the theory that, had Antwerp been given priority, the war in Europe may have ended sooner. THE QUANDARY OF ALLIED LOGISTICS FROM D-DAY TO THE RHINE A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History By Parker Andrew Roberson November, 2018 © Parker Roberson, 2018 THE QUANDARY OF ALLIED LOGISTICS FROM D-DAY TO THE RHINE By Parker Andrew Roberson APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS: Dr. Wade G. Dudley, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. Gerald J. Prokopowicz, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. Michael T. Bennett, Ph.D. CHAIR OF THE DEP ARTMENT OF HISTORY: Dr. Christopher Oakley, Ph.D. DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL: Dr. Paul J.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO 20/2020: Twenty Bold Ideas to Reimagine the Alliance After The
    NATO 2O / 2O2O TWENTY BOLD IDEAS TO REIMAGINE THE ALLIANCE AFTER THE 2020 US ELECTION NATO 2O/2O2O The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strategies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of nonpartisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. The Scowcroft Center’s Transatlantic Security Initiative brings together top policymakers, government and military officials, business leaders, and experts from Europe and North America to share insights, strengthen cooperation, and develop innovative approaches to the key challenges facing NATO and the transatlantic community. This publication was produced in partnership with NATO’s Public Diplomacy Division under the auspices of a project focused on revitalizing public support for the Alliance. NATO 2O / 2O2O TWENTY BOLD IDEAS TO REIMAGINE THE ALLIANCE AFTER THE 2020 US ELECTION Editor-in-Chief Christopher Skaluba Project and Editorial Director Conor Rodihan Research and Editorial Support Gabriela R. A. Doyle NATO 2O/2O2O Table of Contents 02 Foreword 56 Design a Digital Marshall Plan by Christopher Skaluba by The Hon. Ruben Gallego and The Hon. Vicky Hartzler 03 Modernize the Kit and the Message by H.E. Dame Karen Pierce DCMG 60 Build Resilience for an Era of Shocks 08 Build an Atlantic Pacific by Jim Townsend and Anca Agachi Partnership by James Hildebrand, Harry W.S. Lee, 66 Ramp Up on Russia Fumika Mizuno, Miyeon Oh, and by Amb.
    [Show full text]
  • Dod Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9
    DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Change 2 December 2001 ENCLOSURE 1 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS AND RELATED AGENCIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR SUPPORT AND FOR SUPPORT TO U.S. ELEMENTS Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent A. NATO 1. NATO Military Committee Agencies a. International Military Staff (IMS) Army (Brussels BE) b. Permanent Military Representatives to NATO Army (Brussels BE) c. Canada - U.S. Regional Planning Group Army (Brussels BE) 2. NATO Organizations and Agencies a. NATO Communications, Command and Control Air Force Agency (NC3A) (The Hague NL) b. Military Agency for Standardization (MAS) Army (Brussels BE) c. NATO Defense College Navy (Rome IT) d. NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency (NAMSA) Army (Luxemburg) f. NATO Hawk Management Office Army (Ruell-Malmaison FR) g. NATO ACCS Management Agency (NACMA) Army (Brussels BE) h. NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Army Programme Management Agency (NAPMA) (Brunssum NL) 9-1 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Change 2 December 2001 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent i. NATO Airborne Early Warning Force Command Army (Mons BE) j. NATO Airborne Early Warning Main Operating Base Air Force (Geilenkirchen GE) k. NATO CE-3A Component Air Force (Geilenkirchen GE) l. NATO Research and Technology Organization (RTO) Air Force (Nueilly-sur-Seine FR) l. NATO School Army (Oberammergau GE) m. NATO CIS Operating and Support Agency (NACOSA) Army (Glons BE) n. NATO Communication and Information Systems School Navy (NCISS) (Latina, IT) o. NATO Pipeline Committee (NPC) Army (Glons BE) p. NATO Regional Operating Center Atlantic Navy (ROCLANT)/NACOSA Support Element (NSE) West (Oeiras PO) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Death of an Institution: the End for Western European Union, a Future
    DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? EGMONT PAPER 46 DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? ALYSON JK BAILES AND GRAHAM MESSERVY-WHITING May 2011 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision- making process. *** President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc TRENTESEAU Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP *** Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website: www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be J. Story-Scientia NV Wetenschappelijke Boekhandel Sint-Kwintensberg 87 B-9000 Gent Tel. 09/225 57 57 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.story.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxess.be ISBN 978 90 382 1785 7 D/2011/4804/136 U 1612 NUR1 754 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Logistics
    Chapter 1 The Nature of Logistics “Throughout the struggle, it was in his logistic inability to maintain his armies in the field that the enemy’s fatal weak- ness lay. Courage his forces had in full measure, but courage was not enough. Reinforcements failed to arrive, weapons, ammunition and food alike ran short, and the dearth of fuel caused their powers of tactical mobility to dwindle to the van- ishing point. In the last stages of the campaign they could do little more than wait for the Allied advance to sweep over them.”1 —Dwight Eisenhower “As we select our forces and plan our operations, . [w]e must understand how logistics can impact on our concepts of operation. Commanders must base all their concepts of operations on what they know they can do logistically.”2 —A. M. Gray, Jr. MCDP 4 The Nature of Logistics o conduct logistics effectively, we must first under-stand T its fundamental nature—its purpose and its characteris- tics—as well as its relationship to the conduct of military op- erations. This understanding will become the basis for developing a theory of logistics and a practical guide to its application. WHAT IS LOGISTICS? Logistics is the science of planning and carrying out the move- ment and maintenance of forces.3 Logistics provides the re- sources of combat power, positions those resources on the battlefield, and sustains them throughout the execution of op- erations. Logistics encompasses a wide range of actions and the relationships among those actions, as well as the resources that make those actions possible.
    [Show full text]
  • FAQ Abouth The
    FAQ about the NATO Codification System Revised Aug 2017 FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is a NATO Stock Number (NSN)? 2. How do I get my items codified? 3. Who is the point of contact for National NCBs? 4. What do I do if I need an NATO Stock Number (NSN) as a matter of urgency? 5. How long will it take to get a NATO Stock Number? 6. Where can we get information on the NATO MCRL? 7. Who uses an Item of Supply? 8 Can you provide the technical information of an Item of Supply? 9. How can I find out the NSNs registered against my Company? 10. How can you tell who manufacturers the Item of Supply from a reference listed on the NSN? 11. Whom should I contact if the information on file is incorrect? 12. How do I add the United Kingdom, for example, as a user to a foreign NSN (to a United States NSN, for example)? 13. How do I add the reference number of a new supplier I have discovered, to an existing NSN? 14. Why would or should I go to the trouble of doing either of the last 2 actions above? 15. Why do you need all the technical source data for the item? 16. Who’s in charge of the NCS? 17. Can non-NATO countries use the NCS? 18. What is the role of contractors in codification? 1. What is a NATO Stock Number (NSN)? When it is established that an Item of Supply is unique, its identity is fixed through the assignment of its own NATO Stock Number (NSN).
    [Show full text]
  • European Air Group Un Decennio Di Interoperabilità
    Cooperazione internazionale European Air Group Un decennio di interoperabilità Sebastiano Franco varie Nazioni in tale contesto potrà permettere di porre a fattor comune, con maggiore efficacia, sia le capacità operative sia quelle logistiche e di conseguenza ridurre lo l crescente impegno delle Forze Armate in operazio- sforzo economico della singola Nazione. ni multinazionali, nella maggior parte dei casi in aree In tale quadro si inserisce l’European Air Group di High lontane dai confini nazionali, comporta una continua e Wycombe (UK) la cui missione è di “migliorare le capa- Isempre maggiore capacità di operare congiuntamente tra cità operative delle Aeronautiche dei Paesi membri per le varie componenti operative delle Nazioni im- condurre operazioni che perseguono interessi pegnate in tali operazioni. Di fatto diventa una comuni, principalmente attraverso meccanismi necessità imprescindibile in considerazione che accrescono l’interoperabilità”. anche dei notevoli tagli di bilancio nel comparto Difesa nella maggior parte degli Stati europei, Le origini nonostante i numerosi impegni operativi che, Durante la prima Guerra del Golfo (1991) l’Ae- verosimilmente, saranno mantenuti pressoché ronautica Militare francese e quella britannica si inalterati.Tale intensità, in termini di impegni ope- sono trovate ad operare congiuntamente senza rativi, potrà pertanto essere mantenuta concentrando avere però alla base un addestramento comune. Tale ogni possibile sforzo anche nella ricerca della più spinta situazione si è ripetuta in seguito durante il periodo iniziale interoperabilità, da intendersi nel suo significato più ampio delle operazioni nei Balcani. Sulla scorta di tali esperien- del termine, includendo non soltanto gli aspetti tecnici ma ze i governi dei due Paesi decisero, durante il summit di anche quelli procedurali ed umani (addestramento, lingua, Chartres nel 1994, di dare vita ad una organizzazione che, ecc.).
    [Show full text]